NORTH SHORE HEALTH
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
North Shore Health in Grand Marais, Minnesota, has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating that it is slightly above average but not without concerns. It ranks #190 out of 337 facilities in Minnesota, placing it in the bottom half overall, yet it holds the top position in Cook County with no other local options available. The facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 2 in 2024 to 4 in 2025. Staffing is a significant weakness, earning only 1 out of 5 stars and having a high turnover rate of 58%, which is above the state average of 42%. However, it has good RN coverage, being better than 79% of Minnesota facilities, which helps catch potential issues. Specific concerns included failures to ensure proper dishwasher temperatures for sanitizing dishes, risking the health of all residents who received meals, and not providing adequate care planning for residents, which may affect their treatment and recovery. Overall, while there are strengths in RN coverage and no fines on record, families should be aware of the staffing challenges and recent compliance issues.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Minnesota
- #190/337
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Minnesota facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 64 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Minnesota nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Minnesota average (3.2)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
12pts above Minnesota avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
10 points above Minnesota average of 48%
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate provider orders as well as indications for use for aqua...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 6 residents (R7, R10, R12, R15, R60) reviewed for imm...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold for 2 of 2 residents (R5, R30) reviewe...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection prevention measures were in place to ensure linen was properly handled and stored. These deficient practices ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) to 2 of 2 residents (R8, R26) reviewed who remained in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and document review the facility failed to perform passive range of motion (PROM) and a walking program as or...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's dishwasher temperatures were reaching the minimum temperature for the wash and rinse cycles. This def...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Minnesota facilities.
- • 58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is North Shore Health's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns NORTH SHORE HEALTH an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Minnesota, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is North Shore Health Staffed?
CMS rates NORTH SHORE HEALTH's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Minnesota average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at North Shore Health?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at NORTH SHORE HEALTH during 2023 to 2025. These included: 6 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates North Shore Health?
NORTH SHORE HEALTH is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 37 certified beds and approximately 27 residents (about 73% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in GRAND MARAIS, Minnesota.
How Does North Shore Health Compare to Other Minnesota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Minnesota, NORTH SHORE HEALTH's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting North Shore Health?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is North Shore Health Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, NORTH SHORE HEALTH has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Minnesota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at North Shore Health Stick Around?
Staff turnover at NORTH SHORE HEALTH is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Minnesota average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was North Shore Health Ever Fined?
NORTH SHORE HEALTH has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is North Shore Health on Any Federal Watch List?
NORTH SHORE HEALTH is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.