DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Dunbar Village Terrace in Bay Saint Louis, Mississippi, has a Trust Grade of C, meaning it is average and falls in the middle of the pack. It ranks #67 out of 200 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among only two facilities in Hancock County. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from six in 2024 to three in 2025. However, staffing is a concern, with a low rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a high turnover rate of 60%, which is above the state average. Additionally, there have been some troubling incidents, including a resident with cognitive impairment who was able to exit the facility unsupervised, posing a serious risk, and there were also issues with medication administration and food safety, such as moldy strawberries found in the kitchen.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Mississippi
- #67/200
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $8,021 in fines. Higher than 78% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near Mississippi average (2.6)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
13pts above Mississippi avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
12 points above Mississippi average of 48%
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice observed during ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and the facility's ServSafe (a food safety training and certification program) documentation review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in a safe and s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all clinical records, including nurse practitioner (NP) visit notes, were readily accessible to licensed nursing ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, facility policy review, and facility investigation review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent Resident #1, who was identified as an elop...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plan interventions related to a resident with full length bed rails (Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling catheter tubing was stabilized to prevent trauma and failed to provide incontin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to date and label a tube feeding bag for one (1) of (1) residents reviewed for tube feeding management....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to inform a resident or the Resident Representative (RR) of the risk and benefits of full length bed rails prior to bed rail ins...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) psychotropic medic...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 9 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • Grade C (51/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Dunbar Village Terrace's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Dunbar Village Terrace Staffed?
CMS rates DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 60%, which is 13 percentage points above the Mississippi average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Dunbar Village Terrace?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE during 2024 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 8 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Dunbar Village Terrace?
DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 55 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BAY SAINT LOUIS, Mississippi.
How Does Dunbar Village Terrace Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (60%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Dunbar Village Terrace?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Dunbar Village Terrace Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Dunbar Village Terrace Stick Around?
Staff turnover at DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE is high. At 60%, the facility is 13 percentage points above the Mississippi average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Dunbar Village Terrace Ever Fined?
DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE has been fined $8,021 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,159. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Dunbar Village Terrace on Any Federal Watch List?
DUNBAR VILLAGE TERRACE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.