LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Landmark Nursing and Rehab Center has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerning issues. They rank #73 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi, placing them in the top half, and #1 out of 2 in Prentiss County, meaning there is only one local option that ranks higher. The facility is improving, with the number of reported issues decreasing from four to two over the past year. Staffing is a strength here, rated 5 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for the state. However, the center has faced significant fines totaling $29,900, which is higher than 85% of facilities in Mississippi, suggesting ongoing compliance challenges. Specific incidents reported include a failure to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse, as evidence showed the facility did not adequately respond to visible injuries on a resident. Additionally, they failed to notify local law enforcement about the alleged abuse of a vulnerable adult and had issues with securing electronic health records, which compromises resident privacy. While the staffing and overall rating are strengths, the facility has serious concerns regarding resident safety and compliance with regulations.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Mississippi
- #73/200
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 50% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $29,900 in fines. Higher than 77% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Mississippi. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Mississippi average (2.6)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff, resident, and resident representative (RR) interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident, resident representative, and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the local law enforcement agency and the state B...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to secure electronic health...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident with a skin concern and Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to use the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care for a resident on ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to send written notification to the res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2019
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection as evidenced by failure to utilize a barrier during medication admini...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 harm violation(s), $29,900 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 7 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $29,900 in fines. Higher than 94% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade D (45/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Staffed?
CMS rates LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 50%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 5 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center?
LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 80 certified beds and approximately 62 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BOONEVILLE, Mississippi.
How Does Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (50%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Stick Around?
LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Ever Fined?
LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER has been fined $29,900 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,378. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?
LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.