LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER

100 LAUREN DRIVE, BOONEVILLE, MS 38829 (662) 720-0972
For profit - Corporation 80 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
45/100
#73 of 200 in MS
Last Inspection: April 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Landmark Nursing and Rehab Center has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerning issues. They rank #73 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi, placing them in the top half, and #1 out of 2 in Prentiss County, meaning there is only one local option that ranks higher. The facility is improving, with the number of reported issues decreasing from four to two over the past year. Staffing is a strength here, rated 5 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for the state. However, the center has faced significant fines totaling $29,900, which is higher than 85% of facilities in Mississippi, suggesting ongoing compliance challenges. Specific incidents reported include a failure to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse, as evidence showed the facility did not adequately respond to visible injuries on a resident. Additionally, they failed to notify local law enforcement about the alleged abuse of a vulnerable adult and had issues with securing electronic health records, which compromises resident privacy. While the staffing and overall rating are strengths, the facility has serious concerns regarding resident safety and compliance with regulations.

Trust Score
D
45/100
In Mississippi
#73/200
Top 36%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
4 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
50% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$29,900 in fines. Higher than 77% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Mississippi. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
○ Average
7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Mississippi average (2.6)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 50%

Near Mississippi avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $29,900

Below median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff, resident, and resident representative (RR) interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff, resident, and resident representative (RR) interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse for one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled. Resident #1 Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, with revision date of 10/10/22, revealed, This facility's policy is to protect each resident's health, welfare, and rights by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property . Abuse means the willful infliction of injury . Record review of the Facility Investigation Final Report to the State Agency and Attorney General dated 2/25/25 revealed that on 2/20/25 at approximately 2:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was present in the facility and was informed by a hall nurse that Resident #1 had a bruise on her left cheek under her eye, redness to her neck and blood on her lips. DON assessed Resident #1 and noted the injuries above. DON began interviewing staff in the facility who stated that previous shift reported the resident was yelling and combative during 3-11 shift while the nurse was attempting to administer her medications. The Administrator and DON began interviewing 3-11 staff from the previous night. Staff reported hearing Resident #1 yelling she hit me. Staff went in to check on the resident upon hearing her yell and did not see anyone hit resident. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 stated Resident #1 became combative, yelling and swinging her arms and knocking the medication cup out of the nurse's hand. LPN #1 stated she did not hit or injure the resident. LPN #1 was suspended on 2/21/25 by the Administrator. There were no witnesses present when the incident was believed to have occurred. Upon investigation, the injuries coincide with someone holding the resident's face showing probability that LPN#1 held the resident's mouth to get her to take her medication while she was being combative causing bruising and redness to resident's face and neck. LPN #1 was terminated on 2/24/25. Abuse is substantiated. Record review of Progress Note of LPN #1 dated 2/20/25 at 11:20 PM, revealed, Resident has obvious redness to left side of neck. Resident was combative during med pass this shift swinging her arms and spitting out PO (by mouth) crushed meds with applesauce down face and clothing. CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) present just outside resident door during this occurrence. Charge nurse (CN) asked to attempt to administer PO crushed meds for second time. CN stated difficulty attempting to administer PO meds. CNA was also present during this medication administration . Record review of Progress Note dated 2/21/25 at 3:14 AM by the DON revealed, At this time, the RN (Registered Nurse) was present in the facility and was informed of redness on (proper name removed) Resident #1's left face and neck. RN was unaware of any prior skin concerns and accompanied the hall LPN to assess the resident. Upon entering the resident's room, the RN observed redness on the left side of the neck and discoloration along the left cheek near the orbital bone. A small amount of dried blood was noted around the resident's mouth, which was cleaned. Upon further assessment, the RN lifted the resident's upper lip and observed bright red blood at the top of the mouth. No active bleeding or additional concerns were noted at this time. RN attempted to wake up resident to inquire about pain or what might of happened, resident lethargic at this time and in no apparent distress or pain. Administrator notified at 0318. Internal investigation began at this point and statements obtained from staff. Resident is on Aspirin and Plavix. Nurse Practitioner notified, no new orders at this time. Representative aware and will be coming to facility at a later time today. Record review of Progress Note dated 2/21/25 at 3:36 AM by hall LPN #1 on night shift revealed, CNAs brought it this nurse attention redness to neck and face and dried blood on resident's mouth and lips. Upon further assessment of resident this nurse noted there to be redness and possible bruising area on left cheek and redness on right cheek. When CNA was cleaning dried blood from mouth there was noted more blood and bloody tissue inside her mouth around gums and teeth, also a raised area on right side of top of tongue. This nurse reported this to Charge Nurse and DON for further assessment. CNA cleaned resident's mouth as best possible until she stated it hurt her mouth. At present time resident is resting in bed with eyes closed and no complaints of pain or discomfort. Record review of a Progress Note dated 2/21/25 at 7:26 AM, by an LPN revealed, Resident complained of mouth pain. Administered PRN (as needed) pain med at this time. Resident has dried blood in corner of left side. Cleaned up with wash cloth and warm water. Monitoring will continue. An interview and observation on 3/17/25 at 4:55 PM, revealed Resident #1 lying in bed visiting with her Resident Representative (RR) in the room at her bedside. The resident stated she had been treated with kindness and respect except by one nurse and proceeded to say that nurse brought her medications into her room, and she did not want to take them. The nurse got angry and told her she was going to take them, but the resident refused. She stated the nurse hit her in the face and she grabbed her by her neck and stuck her finger in her mouth and forced it open to give the medication. She stated the nurse Jabbed her finger in my mouth and gums and it hurt for a few days. Resident #1 stated she yelled out and tried to get her to stop. She stated, I just wanted to grab her by the hair and get her away, but I didn't. But I should have so she would know not to do that. She said she could not think of the name of the nurse right now, but she would recognize her. She also said if she did not want her medicine, she should not be forced to take it. She acknowledged she was glad the nurse was fired so she could no longer hurt her or anyone else. The RR said this was the same report and account of the event that the resident had given since the event occurred. The RR asked the resident if it was Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 (proper name removed) and the resident said Yes, that's her name. The RR did not speak when the resident was giving her statement of the occurrence, and she did not prompt the resident during the interview. The resident was speaking clearly and demonstrated the way the nurse held her neck, mouth, and face and this matched the marks that were left on the resident's face. When away from the resident, the RR said the resident had good days and bad days, but today, she had been very clear with her thought process and her communication. She also stated she was glad that it was such a good day for the resident so she could give her statement of what occurred. During an interview on 3/18/25 at 10:20 AM, the DON stated that she came in to work around 3:00 AM on 2/21/25 due to the charge nurse being sick that day and it was reported to her to look at the resident's face and lips and she and another LPN went in to check on the resident. She stated she noted redness to the left side of the neck and on the left cheek near her eye and dried blood was noted around the mouth. She lifted the resident's upper lip and noted bright red blood at the top of the mouth. She was unable to interview the resident since she was drowsy, but she stated that with the interviews and with the injuries, abuse was suspected, and she notified the Administrator right away and reported this incident and began to get statements and began an investigation. She acknowledged each resident has the right to be free from abuse and neglect and she confirmed the facility failed to ensure this for Resident #1. During an interview by phone on 3/18/25 at 11:30 AM, CNA #1 stated she came into work on 2/20/25 for the 11 PM-7 AM shift and during shift change report she was told that Resident #1 was fighting with LPN #1, and the resident had bruising on her face, neck, and a bloody lip. She stated that inside the resident's mouth on her upper gum area, more active bleeding was noted and the resident said it was hurting. She stated that she reported this to the nurse on her shift. During an interview by phone on 3/18/25 at 1:00 PM, Charge Nurse/RN #1 stated she was the nurse on 2/20/25 on the 3 PM-11 PM shift when the incident occurred with Resident #1. She stated around 7:00 PM - 8:00 PM, LPN #1 was in Resident #1's room, and she overheard yelling but could not understand what was being said. LPN #1 came out of the resident's room and told her that Resident #1 was fighting with her and would not take her medication. RN# 1 had LPN #1 gather the medications again and she administered the medications to the resident. She then stated that around 10:30 PM - 11:00 PM, that LPN #1 came to her and asked if she would look at the resident's neck and face and she noted some redness, but she thought it was from the resident resting her face on one of her dolls that was in the bed with her. She did not notice any bleeding from her mouth at that time. She stated the next day, the resident had bruising on her face and neck and bleeding in her mouth and complained of pain from her mouth. An interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 on 3/18/25 at 3:25 PM revealed she was working the 3 PM-11 PM shift on 2/20/25 and she was at the desk charting around 7:30 PM, and she heard Resident #1 screaming and yelled out, You hit me, you hit me. She then saw LPN #1 come out of Resident #1's room and LPN #1 told the Charge Nurse/RN #1 that the resident was fighting her and would not take her medications, and the charge nurse went in to try to give the medications to the resident. When the charge nurse left the resident's room, I went into Resident #1's room and was talking to the resident and noticed her mouth was bleeding and she kept telling me, She hit me, she hit me, she hit me over and over. CNA #3 also came into the room and saw and heard what the resident was saying. CNA #2 stated she did not report this since she thought RN#1 knew because she had just been in the resident's room, but CNA #3 reported this to RN #1 as well. During an interview on 3/18/25 at 3:40 PM, CNA #4 stated she and CNA #3 were working on Resident #1's hall on the 3 PM-11 PM shift on 2/20/25. She stated on the first round there were no concerns noted, but on the second round, CNA #3 told her that Resident #1's mouth was bleeding, so she went to check on her. She noted her mouth was bleeding and she had red marks on the left side of her neck. She asked the resident what happened, and the resident told her the nurse hit her in the face. CNA #4 stated that she then reported this to LPN #1. An interview with CNA #3 on 3/18/25 at 4:20 PM revealed she was working on Resident #1's hall on 2/20/25 for the 3 PM-11 PM shift. She stated that around 7:00 - 8:00 PM, she was performing resident care next door to Resident #1's room, and she heard yelling. She could not understand what was said, but it was Resident #1 and LPN #1 that were in the conversation. She continued to hear the resident crying so as soon as she completed the resident's care, she went into Resident #1's room to check on her and she was still crying, and she noticed her lips were bleeding. She asked the resident what happened and was told that the nurse had hit her in the face. She stated the resident had a bleeding mouth and bruising to her face and neck. She reported this to RN #1, and was told she would check on the resident. During an interview on 3/18/25 at 4:30 PM, the Administrator stated this abuse of Resident #1 happened on 2/20/25. He confirmed abuse of a resident occurred in the facility and that they had terminated LPN #1 for abuse of a resident. He further confirmed that with the staff interviews, the resident's validation of the event, and assessment of the injuries that matched the resident's statement, there was enough evidence to validate that LPN #1 was abusive to the resident. He stated they did substantiate the abuse, and they terminated the employee. He stated LPN #1 did not return to work in the facility after the shift when this event occurred. He acknowledged that each resident has the right to be free from abuse and to have their rights honored. He confirmed the facility failed to prevent abuse of a resident. The State Agency had attempted to get in touch with LPN #1 while in the facility on 03/17/25 and 03/18/25 and left a voicemail. LPN #1 contacted the State Agency on 03/21/25 and during a phone interview on 3/21/25 at 8:30 AM, LPN #1 stated she had not worked in the facility since the event occurred and that the facility terminated her. She confirmed that she had been in-serviced on abuse and neglect and stated she worked the 3 PM-11 PM shift on 2/20/25. She stated that she went into the resident's room to give her medication that had been crushed and put in applesauce, but the resident got angry and did not want to take it. She was flailing her arms and knocked the medicine cup out of her hand as she was trying to give the medication with a plastic spoon. She stated she left the room and told RN #1. She stated the resident did not take the medications and she did not place the spoon with the medications in the resident's mouth. She confirmed that, She wouldn't open her mouth, so I didn't put the spoon in there. When asked about her documented progress note and statement revealing the resident spit out the medication, she stated she did not know why her statement and her progress note said that since she did not put anything in the resident's mouth. She confirmed she gave a signed statement of the events that occurred and documented the events that occurred in the progress notes but still claimed she did not put anything in the resident's mouth. Stated she did not know how the injuries happened and that maybe she bit her lip and hit herself with her arms. She once again stated she did not care what she had written in her statement or progress note, she did not give the medicine or put anything in the resident's mouth and that the resident bit her own lip and hit herself. Record review of Resident #1's Injury report revealed, discoloration to left cheek along eye bone, discoloration to left side of neck and dried blood to mouth. Record review of Resident #1's Trauma Informed Care Assessment dated 2/25/25 revealed, Have you ever had anyone grab your throat? That girl grabbed me by throat to try and get me to take my medicine. It's still sore; In the past month, have you: 1. Had nightmares about the event(s) or thought about the event(s) when you did not want to? Yes I have; 2. Tried hard not to think about the event(s) or went out of your way to avoid situations that reminded you of the event(s)? Yes, cause that hurt really bad; 3. Been constantly on guard, watchful, or easily startled? Yes; 4. Felt numb or detached from people, activities, or your surroundings? Yes; 5. Felt guilty or unable to stop blaming yourself or others for the event(s) or any problems the event(s) may have caused? Yes - I don't feel it was my fault, I blame her. Record review of Personnel Action revealed that the facility terminated LPN #1 on 2/24/25 for suspected abuse of a resident. Record review of admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 1/16/24 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/23/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, resident, resident representative, and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the local law enforcement agency and the state B...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, resident, resident representative, and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the local law enforcement agency and the state Board of Nursing related to abuse of a vulnerable adult for one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled. Resident #1 Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation with revision date of 10/10/22, revealed, This facility's policy is to protect each resident's health, welfare, and rights by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. Abuse means the willful infliction of injury . The policy also revealed, The facility will report all alleged violations and all substantiated incidents to the state agency and to all other agencies as required and take all necessary corrective actions depending on the results of the investigation .f. Report to . the nursing board any knowledge of any actions which would indicate an employee is unfit for service . Record review of the Facility Investigation Final Report to the State Agency and Attorney General dated 2/25/25 revealed that on 2/20/25 at approximately 2:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was present in the facility and was informed by a hall nurse that Resident #1 had a bruise on her left cheek under her eye, redness to her neck and blood on her lips. DON assessed Resident #1 and noted the injuries above. DON began interviewing staff in the facility who stated that previous shift reported the resident was yelling and combative during 3-11 shift while the nurse was attempting to administer her medications. The Administrator and DON began interviewing 3-11 staff from the previous night. Staff reported hearing Resident #1 yelling she hit me. Staff went in to check on the resident upon hearing her yell and did not see anyone hit resident. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 stated Resident #1 became combative, yelling and swinging her arms and knocking the medication cup out of the nurse's hand. LPN #1 stated she did not hit or injure the resident. LPN #1 was suspended on 2/21/25 by the Administrator. There were no witnesses present when the incident was believed to have occurred. Upon investigation, the injuries coincide with someone holding the resident's face showing probability that LPN#1 held the resident's mouth to get her to take her medication while she was being combative causing bruising and redness to resident's face and neck. LPN #1 was terminated on 2/24/25. Abuse is substantiated. On 3/17/25 at 4:55 PM, an interview and observation revealed Resident #1 lying in bed visiting with her Resident Representative (RR) in the room at her bedside. The resident stated she had been treated with kindness and respect except by one nurse and proceeded to say that nurse brought her medications into her room and she did not want to take them. The nurse got angry and told her she was going to take them, but the resident refused. She stated the nurse hit her in the face and she grabbed her by her neck and stuck her finger in her mouth and forced it open to give the medication. She stated the nurse Jabbed her finger in my mouth and gums and it hurt for a few days. Resident #1 stated she yelled out and tried to get her to stop. She stated, I just wanted to grab her by the hair and get her away, but I didn't. But I should have so she would know not to do that. On 3/18/25 at 4:30 PM, an interview the Administrator stated this abuse of Resident #1 happened on 2/20/25 and it was reported to the Attorney General's office and the State Agency. He confirmed he did not notify the local police since he thought it was sufficient to notify the Attorney General's Office which was considered the top law enforcement agency in the state. He also stated this incident with the nurse was not reported to the state Board of Nursing since there were no witnesses to the abuse. He confirmed that the facility had gathered statements from witnesses who overheard the incident, and it correlated with the injuries that the resident sustained. He then confirmed that abuse of a resident did occur in the facility and with the staff interviews, the resident's validation of the event, and assessment of the injuries that matched the resident's statement, there was enough evidence to validate. He stated they did substantiate the abuse, and they terminated the employee. He acknowledged that each resident has the right to be free from abuse and to have their rights honored. He confirmed the facility failed to prevent abuse of a resident and confirmed the facility failed to notify and report this to the local law enforcement agency and to the Board of Nursing after a resident was injured by a nurse. Record review of admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #1 on 1/16/24 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/23/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
Apr 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to secure electronic health...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to secure electronic health records as evidenced by an Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) was visible while the medication cart was unattended on the Alzheimer's unit for one (1) of 16 residents residing in the unit. Resident #66 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy with a revision date of 11/28/2017 titled Confidentiality of Information revealed, This facility shall maintain an individual's right to privacy and confidentiality of information . Confidentiality of the resident record shall be maintained at all times by keeping the record closed when not in use. If an electronic health record is used, ensure that no other individual can read the screen and log-off the computer when not in use. An observation on 4/2/24 at 10:15 AM, of a computer that was located on a medication cart on the Alzheimer's unit revealed the computer was opened with Resident #66's EMAR information visible on the screen. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was in Resident #66's room and the screen was visible to anyone passing by the medication cart in the hallway. The visible information included Resident #66's name, medications, and room number. An interview on 4/2/24 at 10:18 AM, LPN #2 confirmed that the EMAR for Resident #66 was visible on the screen to anyone walking by and should be closed when she was away from the medication cart to secure private health information. She stated I have to remind myself every day to close the screen before stepping away from the cart. LPN #2 confirmed that this is a violation of keeping the resident's medical records private and a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) issue. An interview on 4/02/24 at 10:50 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that a resident's information should never be left up on the computer screen while the cart is unattended. The DON stated there is a privacy button that is supposed to be pushed before the nurse steps away from the computer. The DON confirmed this is a privacy issue and could result in a HIPAA violation. Record review of Resident #66's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, Anemia, and Atherosclerotic heart disease.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident with a skin concern and Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP)...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a resident with a skin concern and Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP) for one (1) of 19 residents sampled. Resident #72 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Plan of Care with a revision date of 10/10/2022 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment . Resident #72 Record review of the Order Summary for Resident #72 revealed an order dated 3/31/2024, Contact Isolation due to MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) to right hand. Record review of the Order Summary for Resident #72 revealed an order dated 4/03/2024, Clean abrasion to right hand with ns (normal saline), pat dry, cover with small island dressing daily. Record review of Resident #72's Care Plans revealed a care plan was not developed for the skin concern on the right hand that required contact isolation. An interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 on 4/03/2024 at 2:10 PM, revealed she was responsible for the development of Resident #72's care plans. She confirmed that she did not develop the care plan related to the skin concern or contact isolation and stated that staff would not know what care to perform. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/03/2024 at 2:50 PM, revealed the purpose of the care plan was for staff to know how to properly care for the resident. Record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #72 on 2/27/2024 with medical diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and Major depressive disorder.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to use the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care for a resident on ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to use the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) while providing care for a resident on contact isolation and failed to dispose of contaminated linens and trash into the designated biohazard containers in the room for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions (TBP). Resident #72 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Transmission-Based Precautions with a revision date of 10/10/2022 revealed Policy: It is our policy to take appropriate precautions to prevent the transmission of pathogens based on the pathogens' modes of transmission .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 8. Contact Precautions- . c. Healthcare personnel caring for residents on Contact Precautions wear a gown and gloves for all interactions, that may involve contact with the resident or potentially contaminated areas in the resident's environment. d. Donning personal protective equipment (PPE) upon entry and discarding before exiting the room is done to contain pathogens, especially those that have been implicated in transmission through environmental contamination . Resident #72 An observation outside Resident #72's door revealed a sign Contact Precautions -apply gown and gloves. Observed a designated plastic container outside the room door with the required PPE that included gown and gloves. An observation inside the resident's bathroom revealed two (2) biohazard containers designated for linen and trash disposal. Record review of the Culture Miscellaneous with Stain dated 3/27/2024 revealed Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) of wound drainage for Resident #72. Record review of the Order Summary for Resident #72 revealed an order dated 3/31/2024, Contact Isolation due to MRSA to right hand. An observation of catheter care for Resident #72, on 4/03/2024 at 9:55 AM, with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 and #2 revealed, they entered the resident's room and did not apply a gown. CNA #2 performed catheter care with the assist of CNA #1. Following the completion of catheter care, they turned the resident over on his side and changed his brief, repositioned the bed pad and pulled the resident up in the bed. CNA #2 gathered the soiled linen and trash in clear trash bags, exited the room, and threw them into the dirty linen and trash container on 200 hall. An interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 on 4/03/2024 at 10:20 AM, revealed she spoke with the charge nurse on Sunday 3/31/2024 and was told that the resident was contagious, but she did not have to wear a gown. She confirmed that she read the sign outside the resident's door that indicated to wear a gown but did not think anything about it. She stated she knew to place the linen and trash in the biohazard containers in the room but got nervous and messed up. CNA #2 revealed the purpose of separating the linen and trash from other residents was to prevent the spread of infection throughout the facility. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/03/2024 at 10:35 AM, revealed for a resident in contact precautions, the staff were expected to dress out in a gown and gloves. He stated the linen and trash were to be discarded in the room to prevent the spread of infection to others in the facility. An interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 4/03/2024 at 10:39 AM, revealed the resident was in contact isolation for MRSA on the right hand. She revealed it was the facility policy to start contact precautions when a culture came back with MRSA. She explained that the staff were expected to wear gowns while providing care. The IP revealed the linen and trash should have been disposed of in the biohazard barrels in the room to prevent the spread of infection. Record review revealed the facility admitted Resident #72 on 2/27/2024 with medical diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and Major Depressive disorder.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to send written notification to the res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to send written notification to the resident and/or resident representative (RR) upon transfer to the hospital for two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for hospitalization. Resident #30 and Resident #42 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge with a revision date of 10/18/2022 revealed .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 4. The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they can understand . Record review of Resident #42's Progress note dated 02/22/24 revealed Resident #42 was found to be non-responsive to verbal or tactile stimuli and her oxygen saturation was 82% 911 was notified for transport to the emergency room (ER) . Resident #42 left the facility by ambulance on 02/22/24 at 6:20 PM. Record review revealed there was not a written notification of transfer given to the family for Resident #42 dated 02/22/24 when she was transferred to the hospital. On 04/02/24 at 12:05 PM, in an interview with Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed that they were not mailing written transfer notifications to the residents' RR's when residents were transferred to the hospital. On 04/02/24 at 1:14 PM, an interview with Social Worker (SW), revealed that she did not have a copy of the transfer/discharge notification dated 02/22/24 on Resident #42, the date she was transferred out to the hospital. The SW revealed that she called the Responsible Party (RP) about bed hold only and confirmed that she had not been mailing the notice of transfer/discharge out to the RP. The SW stated, I didn't realize I was supposed to be mailing them to the RPs, but will get them sent out from now on. Record review of Resident #42's admission Record revealed that she was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and Dementia. Resident #30 Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident #30 revealed on 1/12/2024, the resident was transferred to the hospital for .seizure like activity and unresponsive to verbal and physical stimuli . An interview with the SW on 4/02/2024 at 11:20 AM, confirmed she had not mailed out a written notification of transfer/discharge to the RP for Resident #30. She revealed she was unsure who was responsible for doing that. An interview with the DON on 4/02/2024 at 12:02 PM, revealed that the nurses send out the written notification of transfer/discharge with the residents when they were transferred to the hospital. He confirmed they had not been mailing a copy to the RP. An interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 4/02/2024 at 12:07 PM, revealed he was not aware the written notification of transfer/discharge was not being mailed out to the responsible party's (RP) and confirmed it should have been. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #30 on 12/28/2023 with medical diagnoses which included Seizures and Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Nov 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection as evidenced by failure to utilize a barrier during medication admini...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection as evidenced by failure to utilize a barrier during medication administration, failure to clean/sanitize a pulse oximeter before use, and storing the pulse oximeter in a uniform pocket, prior to use, for one (1) of three (3) medication observations. Findings include: Review of the facility's Infection Prevention Program policy, revised 11/28/2019, revealed the charge of the Infection Prevention Committee shall be to establish an Infection Prevention Program that protects residents, visitors, staff, and volunteers from facility associated, community-acquired and workplace-related infections. During an observation of the medication pass, on 11/25/19 at 8:50 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 took a Symbicort Inhaler and an Incruse Inhaler into the resident's room for administration. LPN #1 placed the inhalers on the the resident's overbed table, without the use of a barrier. Following administration of the inhalers, LPN #1 placed the inhalers back in the medication cart. LPN #1 removed a pulse oximeter from her pocket and placed it on the resident's finger. After completing the oxygen saturation monitoring, she removed the pulse oximeter and placed it back into her pocket. The pulse oximeter was not cleaned and/or sanitized prior/after use. During an interview, on 11/25/19 at 2:10 PM, LPN #1 revealed they have plate barriers to use when giving medications, but she just didn't think about it. She confirmed she should not have placed the inhalers on the resident's table, because it was dirty. She stated she carried germs back to the medication cart, when she did not use a barrier, and did not wipe the inhalers before putting them back into the cart. She stated the pulse oximeter was in her pocket, because it was her personal oximeter she brought from home. She confirmed the pulse oximeter should not be in her pocket, because of germs. LPN #1 stated the pulse oximeter should be cleaned before use, and before placement in the medication cart. During an interview, on 11/25/19 at 3:40 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed LPN #1 knew she should use a barrier or clean the table, prior to putting anything on the table. She confirmed putting the inhalers back in the medication cart, without cleaning them, took germs into the cart. The DON also stated LPN #1 should not use her personal equipment. She stated no equipment should be placed in the nurses' pocket, and the pulse oximeter should be cleaned like the glucometer, before and after use. In an interview, on 11/25/19 at 4:10 PM, the Administrator stated LPN #1 had recently been in-serviced on medication administration the first of the month, and performed a medication administration competency in June 2019. The Administrator stated LPN #1 knew better. Record review revealed LPN #1 attended an in-service on 11/6/19, which included infection control instructions to not carry items in your pocket into the room, example: eye drops, test strips, lancets etc
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 harm violation(s), $29,900 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 7 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $29,900 in fines. Higher than 94% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade D (45/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Staffed?

CMS rates LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 50%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center?

State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 5 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center?

LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 80 certified beds and approximately 62 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BOONEVILLE, Mississippi.

How Does Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (50%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.

Is Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Stick Around?

LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 50%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center Ever Fined?

LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER has been fined $29,900 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,378. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Landmark Nursing And Rehab Center on Any Federal Watch List?

LANDMARK NURSING AND REHAB CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.