DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Diversicare of Brookhaven has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #109 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi places it in the bottom half of all nursing homes in the state, and it is the lowest-ranked facility out of four in Lincoln County. The facility's performance has been stable, with five major issues reported consistently over the past two years. Staffing is a relative strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 39%, which is better than the state average. However, the facility has incurred $13,520 in fines, which is concerning and suggests ongoing compliance problems. Specific incidents reported by inspectors are alarming. For example, a Certified Nurse Aide was found to have verbally and physically abused a resident during care, leading to emotional distress. Additionally, residents' dignity was compromised as one was exposed during incontinence care due to an open curtain, and another was not provided with necessary privacy for their catheter. While the staffing levels are good, these serious issues highlight significant weaknesses that families should consider when evaluating this facility for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Mississippi
- #109/200
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 39% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $13,520 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 44 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Mississippi. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 20 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (39%)
9 points below Mississippi average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Mississippi average (2.6)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 20 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
5 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect residents right to be free from verbal, mental, and physical abuse for two (2) of four (4) sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, record review and interviews the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of verbal and mental abuse for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents that r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plan interventions for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents reviewed fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow hand hygiene practices consistent with accepted standards of practice during incontinence care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner that protected the dignity and privacy of residents for three (3...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review, facility policy review, and manufacturer's guidelines review, the facility failed to ensure a resident rinsed her mouth after the ad...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident's CPAP (Cont...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%, as evidenced by two (2) medication errors observed out o...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to correctly code a discharge from th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician and Resident Representative (RR) were notified when a resident refused to take medications f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect as evidenced by staff using foul language in the p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's right to choose health...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a PASRR (Pre-admission Screen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store the Flonase belongin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain a properly functio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure cookware was properly sanitized for one (1) of two (2) kitchen tours. All 55 residents residing in the...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2019
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #36
A Review of Resident #36's MDS, with an ARD of 8/20/19, Section J1800, revealed No was marked regarding if there wh...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0728
(Tag F0728)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and facility statement, the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aides (NA) in Training completed the examination within 120 days for three (3) of 43 nurse aides ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible sp...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 39% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 20 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $13,520 in fines. Above average for Mississippi. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Diversicare Of Brookhaven's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Diversicare Of Brookhaven Staffed?
CMS rates DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 56%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Diversicare Of Brookhaven?
State health inspectors documented 20 deficiencies at DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 18 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Diversicare Of Brookhaven?
DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by DIVERSICARE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 58 certified beds and approximately 51 residents (about 88% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BROOKHAVEN, Mississippi.
How Does Diversicare Of Brookhaven Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Diversicare Of Brookhaven?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Diversicare Of Brookhaven Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Diversicare Of Brookhaven Stick Around?
DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Diversicare Of Brookhaven Ever Fined?
DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN has been fined $13,520 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,214. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Diversicare Of Brookhaven on Any Federal Watch List?
DIVERSICARE OF BROOKHAVEN is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.