CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE

302 ELLIS STREET, CARTHAGE, MS 39051 (601) 267-1352
For profit - Corporation 60 Beds TREND CONSULTANTS Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
83/100
#29 of 200 in MS
Last Inspection: May 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Carthage Senior Care holds a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #29 out of 200 nursing homes in Mississippi, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among the two facilities in Leake County. However, the facility's trend is worsening, as the number of identified issues increased from 1 in 2023 to 3 in 2024. Staffing is a strength here, with a 5-star rating and a low turnover rate of 28%, significantly below the state average, indicating that staff are experienced and familiar with the residents. While the facility has not received any fines, which is a positive sign, there have been concerns regarding care plan compliance. Specific incidents included failing to implement care plans for residents requiring splinting devices and not providing appropriate treatments to improve their range of motion. Overall, Carthage Senior Care has notable strengths in staffing and compliance history, but families should be aware of the recent increase in care issues.

Trust Score
B+
83/100
In Mississippi
#29/200
Top 14%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Mississippi's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Mississippi facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 36 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Mississippi. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2024: 3 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Low Staff Turnover (28%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (28%)

    20 points below Mississippi average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

Chain: TREND CONSULTANTS

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record

May 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a care plan re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to implement a care plan related to splinting devices for Resident #17 and develop a care plan for a resident with limited range of motion requiring splinting devices for Resident #26 for (2) two of 16 care plans reviewed. Findings include: Resident #17 Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, undated, revealed Policy: It is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .5. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed . by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment . Record review of the facility policy titled, Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion, implemented 10/2023, revealed .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. Appropriate Care Planning: a. Based on the comprehensive assessment, the facility will provide interventions, exercises and /or therapy to maintain or improve. b. The facility will provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This includes but is not limited to: .ii. Appropriate equipment (braces or splints). Record review of the care plan with a date initiated of 6/10/21 revealed Focus: Resident requires assistance .r/t (related to) right sided weakness and deformities to hand .Goal: Needs will be met every shift .Interventions/Task .Palm protector to right hand during waking hours with a date initiated for the intervention of 1/2/23. During an observation on initial tour on 5/06/24 at 10:15 AM and again at 3:56 PM, revealed Resident #17 had contractures of her right hand with no splints noted. An observation on 05/07/24 at 10:10 AM, revealed Resident #17 in bed. There was no splint on her right hand and no splint observed in the resident's room. An observation and interview on 5/7/24 at 10:55 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed the resident did not have the palm splint on as ordered. She stated the purpose of the splint is to prevent worsening of her contracture. An interview, on 5/07/24 at 11:05 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed the Certified Nursing Assistants are responsible for putting splints on and the nurses check on them. An observation and interview on 5/08/24 at 10:33 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #17 did not have her palm protector in her right hand. He stated that he did not know why but would find out. He stated he thought they took care of that yesterday. An interview on 5/08/24 at 10:36 AM, with the Occupational Therapist (OT) stated she had provided in-service education and made a notebook for the nurse's station to assist the staff with applying splints as they should be. The instructions included the physician order. Record review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 5/1/24 revealed an order dated 1/2/23 revealed, Resident to wear palm protector to right hand during waking hours d/t (due to) contracture/skin protection every day and evening shift for skin protection . An interview, on 5/09/24 at 9:20 AM, with the DON confirmed the resident had a care plan in place for application of the palm splint and confirmed that the care plan was not followed. Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Contracture, right hand. Resident #26 Record review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 5/7/24 revealed an order dated 6/3/21 Resident to wear splints to BIL (bilateral) hands for 1HR/DAY (one hour per day). Place splints on at 8 AM and take off at 9 AM . Review of the comprehensive care plans for Resident #26 revealed there was no care plan developed related to bilateral hand splint use. During a record review and interview with the DON on 5/07/24 at 9:50 AM, confirmed there was no care plan developed for the use of the hand splints for Resident #26. The DON confirmed the purpose of the comprehensive care plans is to direct the resident specific care needed. Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Contracture, unspecified wrist.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility to revise a care plan for a resident who had limited range of motion and required splinting devices for (1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility to revise a care plan for a resident who had limited range of motion and required splinting devices for (1) one of 16 care plans reviewed. Resident #26 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, undated, revealed Policy: It is the policy of the facility to . implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .5. The comprehensive care plan will be .revised . by the interdisciplinary team . Record review of the care plan with a revision date of 4/8/24 revealed, Focus Total care required with ADLs (activities of daily living) R/T (related to) immobility , meds (medications), weakness, contracture to left elbow, quadriplegia .Interventions/Tasks Apply splint to left elbow daily for 30 minutes to prevent further contracture and improve range of motion/skin integrity . An observation on 5/6/24 at 10:15 AM, revealed Resident #26 sitting in the lobby watching TV no splints noted to left elbow contracture. Record review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 5/7/24 revealed an order dated 9/22/23, .Patient to wear . left elbow brace . for 4-6 hours during 3-11 shift. 7 x (times) a week to help prevent risk of further contractures . An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/07/24 at 9:50 AM, confirmed after review of the care plans for Resident #26 there was no revision of the care plan for the elbow brace when the order was changed on 9/22/23 for the resident to wear the brace for 4-6 hours. The DON confirmed the purpose of the comprehensive care plans is to direct the resident's specific care needed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident, Resident Representative (RR), and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident, Resident Representative (RR), and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for (2) two of (9) nine residents with splinting device orders. (Resident #17 and #26) Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion, implemented 10/2023, revealed, .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility in collaboration with the medical director, director of nurses and as appropriate, physical/occupational consultant shall establish and utilize a systematic approach for prevention of decline in range of motion, including the assessment, appropriate care planning, and preventative care . Record review of the facility policy titled, Transcribing Physician Orders, undated, revealed Policy: It is the policy of the facility to transcribe and follow the attending physician's orders as written with order clarification when needed. Procedure: .Transcription will be carried out to appropriate administration record. i.e. (example) MAR (Medication Administration Record) and TAR ( Treatment Administration Record) . End of month printing will take place and all MARs, TARs, and physicians orders will be reviewed for accuracy. Any new orders written will be put on the 24 hour report that is reviewed by the RN (Registered Nurse) unit manager and/or the DON (Director of Nursing) daily. Record review of the facility policy Splint Application dated 10/23 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility that splint application will be done based on referral and recommendation of therapy department. Procedure: Splint will be applied per recommendations of therapy and physician order .Documentation of splint application will be done on the Treatment Administration Record. Resident #17 On initial tour observations at 10:30 AM on 5/06/24 and again at 3:56 PM, revealed a contracture of Resident #17's right hand with no splint in place. During an observation on 5/07/24 at 10:10 AM, revealed Resident #17 in bed with no splint on her right hand and no splint was observed in the resident's room. An observation and interview, on 5/7/24 at 10:55 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed the resident did not have the palm splint on as ordered. LPN #1 searched the resident's room, storage closets, and laundry and was unable to locate the resident's splint. LPN #1 stated that the splint should be in the resident's bedside table drawer. She stated the purpose of the splint is to prevent worsening of her contracture. An interview, on 5/07/24 at 11:05 AM with Registered Nurse (RN #1) revealed the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) are responsible for putting splints on and the nurses check on them. An interview, on 5/07/24 at 11:20 AM with CNA #1 confirmed she was assigned to Resident #17. She stated that after she completed the resident's care this morning she could not find the splint. She stated that she should have let the nurse know she could not find the splint , but she had not seen the nurse. An observation and interview, on 5/08/24 at 10:33 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #17 did not have her palm protector in her right hand. He stated that he did not know why, but would find out. He stated he thought they took care of that yesterday. An interview, on 5/08/24 at 10:36 AM, with the Occupational Therapist (OT) revealed she had not completed a recent assessment on Resident #17. She stated that she had provided in-service education and made a notebook for the nurse's station to assist the staff with applying splints as they should be. The instructions included the physician order. Record review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 5/1/24 revealed an order dated 1/2/23, Resident to wear palm protector to right hand during waking hours d/t (due to) contracture/skin protection every day and evening shift . Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Contracture, unspecified wrist. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/22/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01, indicating Resident #17 has severe cognitive impairment. Resident #26 An observation on 5/6/24 at 10:15 AM, revealed Resident #26 sitting in the lobby watching TV no splints noted to bilateral hands or left elbow contracture. An interview with Resident #26's Resident Representative (RR) on 5/6/24 at 3:45 PM, stated she was worried Resident #26's contractures to his hands and left arm were getting worse because the staff were not putting his splints on. She stated she has brought it to nurses' attention several times, but they are never on when she comes to visit. Resident #26's RR then asked Resident #26 if the staff put his braces on him every day and he shook his head back and forth indicating no and in a very low toned voice said no. Resident #26 was observed to have no splinting devices in place to hands or elbow areas. Record review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 5/7/24 revealed an order dated 6/3/21 Resident to wear splints to BIL (bilateral) hands for 1HR/DAY (one hour per day). Place splints on at 8 AM and take off at 9 AM . Record review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 5/7/24 revealed an order dated 10/18/22, Apply Splint to left elbow daily for 30 minutes to prevent further contracture and improve ROM (range of motion)/skin integrity Record review of the Order Summary Report with active orders as of 5/7/24 revealed an order dated 9/22/23, .Patient to wear left sheepskin palmar splint, left elbow brace, and right soft comfy hand/wrist splint for 4-6 hours during 3-11 shift. 7 x (times) a week to help prevent risk of further contractures . An observation on 5/07/24 at 8:30 AM, revealed resident with no splints to bilateral hands or left elbow. No splints were observed in the room. An observation on 5/07/24 at 9:35 AM, revealed no splinting devices noted to bilateral hands or left elbow. An interview with LPN #2 on 5/07/24 at 9:36 AM, revealed she was assigned to Resident #26 and confirmed she had not applied his hand splints today but knew they were scheduled to be applied from 8:00 AM -9:00 AM. She state she was going to put them on after she finished her medication pass. She also revealed she was assigned to Resident #26 on 5/06/24 and confirmed she did not apply the splints to the resident's hands. During a record review of the physician orders and interview on 5/07/24 at 9:45 AM, with the Director of nursing (DON) revealed that the physician's orders for the splints for Resident #26 was incorrect revealing there were three (3) different orders. He stated the splint order dated 9/22/23 Patient to wear left sheepskin palmar splint, left elbow brace, and right soft comfy hand/wrist splint for 4-6 hours during 3-11 shift. 7 x (times) a week to help prevent risk of further contractures . was the correct order. He then confirmed staff would not have known to follow the physicians order for 9/22/23 to wear the splint 4-6 hours every evening because the order was not transcribed correctly and was not triggering to the TAR. He confirmed the previous 2 splint orders should have been discontinued because the order dated 9/22/23 superseded the previous splint orders. He then revealed all orders should also be reviewed during the 24-hour order check and monthly for accuracy but confirmed they need to do a better job at that. The DON stated with LPN #2 confirming she did not apply the splints and the days on the TAR not signed off as services provided then the staff did not provide the services per the active orders for splints. Record review of the April 2024 TAR for Resident #26 revealed (7) seven out of 30 days the TAR was not initialed with staff initials indicating the bilateral hand splints were applied as ordered, and (1) of 30 days with no initial that the splint to left elbow was applied. Review of the May 2024 TAR for Resident #26 revealed four (4) days from May 1st through 6th with no initials that bilateral hand splints were applied as ordered, and 1 day with no initial that the splint to the left elbow was applied. An interview with the Occupational Therapist (OT) on 5/07/24 at 10:15 AM, revealed she wrote the physician's order on 9/22/23 for the bilateral hands and left elbow splint to be applied for 4-6 hours every evening to prevent further contractures. She also stated she in-serviced the nursing staff on 9/18/23 and again on 4/24/24 on the specific splint application and duration for each resident requiring splints. She stated she was unaware that staff were not following the orders from 9/22/23. The OT then revealed that with staff not applying the splints as ordered it did place the resident at risk for worsening contractures. Record review of an In-service form dated 9/18/23 and 4/24/24, related to Resident #26 revealed Patient to wear left sheepskin palmar splint, left elbow brace, and right soft comfy hand/wrist splint for 4-6 hours during 3-11 shift to help prevent risk of further contractures. The inservice form was signed by LPN #2 and the DON. A follow-up interview with LPN #2 on 5/7/24 at 11:30 AM, revealed she was unaware of the changes in orders for Resident #26's splints. She confirmed they had in-services about splints and applying splints but just didn't realize the orders changed to 4-6 hours daily but confirmed staff were not even following the splint orders triggering to the TAR with all the days not signed off as completed . Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Contracture, unspecified wrist. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/18/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Assessment (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated Resident #26 was cognitively intact.
Apr 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the likelihood of the spread o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the likelihood of the spread of infection as evidenced by staff not cleaning multiuse equipment between residents for one (1) of three (3) survey days. Findings include: A review of the facility's Cleaning of Vital Sign Equipment policy, dated 3/21/2022, revealed It is the policy of this facility to clean vital sign monitoring equipment between use on each resident . An observation on 04/26/23 at 08:25 AM, revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 rolled a Dinamap (vital sign machine) down the hall and entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA #1 then exited the room and did not clean the vital machine and immediately entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA #1 exited the room and did not clean the vital machine and was entering room [ROOM NUMBER] and was stopped by the State Agent (SA). An interview on 04/26/23 at 08:40 AM, CNA #1 revealed, we are supposed to clean the vital machine equipment by using the purple top cleaner between each of the residents' rooms to sanitize it. She confirmed she had not cleaned it between the rooms and there was no cleaner on her cart to do so. She revealed it is my responsibility to clean the equipment between each resident's room and by not cleaning, it could possibly spread infection between the residents. An interview on 04/26/23 at 02:35 PM, the Infection Control Nurse revealed, the Dinemap machines are to be cleaned with the purple top cleaner after leaving a resident's room and entering another one. She confirmed that the Dinamap (Vital sign machine) not being disinfected between rooms could transmit infections among residents. She revealed the staff receives in-services on the importance of cleaning multiuse equipment between residents and she did an in-service this morning when it was brought to her attention that the Dinamap was not being sanitized between resident's rooms. An interview on 04/26/23 at 03:16 PM, the Director of Nurses (DON) revealed the staff is educated at least monthly on various infection control concerns. This is done mainly by the Infection control nurse. He revealed all equipment that is used between the resident rooms is to be cleaned between each room. The staff is to use the Sani-cloth Germicidal disposable wipe (purple top). He confirmed that the vital sign machines not being cleaned between resident rooms could cause the spread of infection between residents.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Mississippi.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Mississippi facilities.
  • • Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Carthage Senior Care's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Carthage Senior Care Staffed?

CMS rates CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 28%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Carthage Senior Care?

State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE during 2023 to 2024. These included: 4 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Carthage Senior Care?

CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by TREND CONSULTANTS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 58 residents (about 97% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CARTHAGE, Mississippi.

How Does Carthage Senior Care Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (28%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Carthage Senior Care?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Carthage Senior Care Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Carthage Senior Care Stick Around?

Staff at CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 28%, the facility is 18 percentage points below the Mississippi average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.

Was Carthage Senior Care Ever Fined?

CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Carthage Senior Care on Any Federal Watch List?

CARTHAGE SENIOR CARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.