MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
MS Care Center of DeKalb has a Trust Grade of C+, which means they are slightly above average but not without issues. They rank #41 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi, placing them in the top half, and they are the only option in Kemper County. The facility is showing improvement, with the number of reported issues decreasing from three in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, rated at 5 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 36%, significantly lower than the state average. However, they have faced some serious incidents, including a resident who fell from a mechanical lift that was not operated according to care protocols, resulting in injuries that required emergency medical attention. Additionally, there was a concern about a resident not having an appropriately sized wheelchair, which can affect their comfort and mobility. Overall, while the facility has strengths in staffing and is improving, there are still notable weaknesses that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Mississippi
- #41/200
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 36% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $10,358 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 47 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Mississippi. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (36%)
12 points below Mississippi average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, facility policy review, and record review, the facility did not follow the plan of care for using a full bo...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, facility policy review, and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent an injury to Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an appropriately sized wheelchair for one (1) of fifty-three residents residing in the fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide residents with a safe environment, as evidenced by various spray bottles and cans of chemical disinfect...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to monitor a resident receiving anticoagulant medication for signs of bruising and bleeding for one (1) of five ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0888
(Tag F0888)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, facility policy review and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Safety and Oversight (QSO) Memo review, the facility failed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2019
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessm...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the Comprehensive Care Plan for storage of an Oxygen (O2) cannula, for one (1) of 19 care plans reviewed, Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide storage for Resident #16's oxygen (O2) nasal cannula to prevent the possible spread of infection and/o...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 36% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 9 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $10,358 in fines. Above average for Mississippi. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Ms Of Dekalb's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Ms Of Dekalb Staffed?
CMS rates MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Ms Of Dekalb?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB during 2019 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 6 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Ms Of Dekalb?
MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MISSISSIPPI CARE CENTER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 53 residents (about 88% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in DE KALB, Mississippi.
How Does Ms Of Dekalb Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (36%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Ms Of Dekalb?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Ms Of Dekalb Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Ms Of Dekalb Stick Around?
MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Ms Of Dekalb Ever Fined?
MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB has been fined $10,358 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,182. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Ms Of Dekalb on Any Federal Watch List?
MS CARE CENTER OF DEKALB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.