HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Holmes County Long Term Care Center in Durant, Mississippi has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #168 out of 200 facilities in the state places them in the bottom half, and they are the second of only two options in Holmes County, meaning there is only one local facility rated higher. Although the number of issues has improved from 6 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, the facility still reports serious incidents, including a resident sustaining a head injury due to improper use of a mechanical lift that required two staff members. Staffing is a relative strength, with a low turnover rate of 0%, but the facility has less RN coverage than 90% of other facilities in Mississippi, raising concerns about oversight. Additionally, the facility has faced fines totaling $8,278, which is average but still indicates compliance issues.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Mississippi
- #168/200
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $8,278 in fines. Higher than 83% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 21 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Mississippi. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Mississippi average (2.6)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, facility policy review, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the care plan for a two (2) pe...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, facility policy reviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent an injury of a resident by not ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, resident representative interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ens...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to prevent the possibility of an accident and hazards as evidenced by not properly securing and storing chemicals for one (1) of three (3) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a controlled substance was signed out on a resident's narcotic administration log at the...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a status change for a resident with a new mental illne...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, pharmacy consultant interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident on a PRN (a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2021
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0576
(Tag F0576)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident and staff interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure Saturday mail delivery to 1 out of 12 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** FACILITY
Dining Observation
An observation on 8/3/21 at 2:45 PM of Certified Nursing Assistant #1 passing out snacks to the resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 12 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade F (38/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Holmes County Long Term - Durant's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Holmes County Long Term - Durant Staffed?
CMS rates HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Holmes County Long Term - Durant?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT during 2021 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 10 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Holmes County Long Term - Durant?
HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by TREND CONSULTANTS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 74 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in DURANT, Mississippi.
How Does Holmes County Long Term - Durant Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Holmes County Long Term - Durant?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Holmes County Long Term - Durant Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Holmes County Long Term - Durant Stick Around?
HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Holmes County Long Term - Durant Ever Fined?
HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT has been fined $8,278 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,162. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Holmes County Long Term - Durant on Any Federal Watch List?
HOLMES COUNTY LONG TERM CARE CENTER - DURANT is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.