TISHOMINGO MANOR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Tishomingo Manor has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns regarding its care quality. Ranking #141 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi places it in the bottom half of state facilities, though it is the top option in Tishomingo County. The facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 2 in 2024 to 6 in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength, rated at 4 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 38%, which is better than the state average. However, $82,656 in fines is alarming, as it is higher than 92% of facilities in Mississippi, suggesting ongoing compliance problems. Specific incidents of concern include a resident being placed in involuntary seclusion and a lack of proper grooming and hygiene for several residents, which can lead to health risks. While staffing appears stable, the overall care quality and the trend of increasing issues are significant weaknesses to consider.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Mississippi
- #141/200
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 38% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $82,656 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Mississippi. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (38%)
10 points below Mississippi average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Mississippi average (2.6)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
6 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0603
(Tag F0603)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, resident/staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one (1) of four (4) residents observed during medication administration. Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for a resident on a fluid restriction for one (1) of 24 care plans reviewed....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to accurately monitor and document fluid intake for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for hydration. R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for one (1) of three (3) resident care observations. Resident #12.
F...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interview, record review, and Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data review, the facility failed to submit PBJ data accurately to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication administration error rate by less than 5% for four (4) of 25 medication a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to submit accurate data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for one (1) of four (4) quarters reviewed. First quarter 2024.
Findi...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
6 deficiencies
3 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Resident #85
A record review of Resident #85's Comprehensive Care Plan with Problem Onset: dated 08/12/2022 revealed, Problem: Resident needs extensive assistance with ADLS-Limited ROM, Weakness, Poor...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #39
An observation and interview on 5/22/23 at 4:00 PM, revealed Resident #39 sitting in a wheelchair in his room. Resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to assure that there was sufficient qualified nursing staff available at all times to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident # 295, #20 and #39
A dining observation on 5/21/23 at 5:35 PM, of the main dining room revealed Resident #295 was serve...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an incident of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident with ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 38% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 4 harm violation(s), $82,656 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 4 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $82,656 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Mississippi. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (10/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Tishomingo Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns TISHOMINGO MANOR an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Tishomingo Manor Staffed?
CMS rates TISHOMINGO MANOR's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Tishomingo Manor?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at TISHOMINGO MANOR during 2023 to 2025. These included: 4 that caused actual resident harm and 10 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Tishomingo Manor?
TISHOMINGO MANOR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE BEEBE FAMILY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 105 certified beds and approximately 100 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in IUKA, Mississippi.
How Does Tishomingo Manor Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, TISHOMINGO MANOR's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Tishomingo Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Tishomingo Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, TISHOMINGO MANOR has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Tishomingo Manor Stick Around?
TISHOMINGO MANOR has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Tishomingo Manor Ever Fined?
TISHOMINGO MANOR has been fined $82,656 across 2 penalty actions. This is above the Mississippi average of $33,905. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Tishomingo Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
TISHOMINGO MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.