LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Louisville Healthcare LLC has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average compared to other nursing homes. It ranks #75 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi, placing it in the top half, and is the best option in Winston County, where it ranks #1 of 2. The facility's trend is stable, with the same number of issues reported in both 2023 and 2025, indicating no significant improvement or decline. Staffing is a strong point, rated 5 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 40%, which is better than the state average. However, the facility has incurred $13,520 in fines, which is concerning and higher than 76% of other facilities in the state. Despite these strengths, there are notable weaknesses. The health inspection rating is only 2 out of 5 stars, reflecting below-average performance. Serious incidents include failures to ensure proper pain management for a resident, leading to uncontrolled pain and a decline in quality of life, as well as not implementing the necessary care plan for residents needing assistance. Additionally, infection control practices were not followed, as staff did not remove protective equipment after exiting isolation rooms, which raises concerns about the potential spread of infections. Overall, while there are strong staffing levels, families should be aware of the facility's issues with care management and health inspections.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Mississippi
- #75/200
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 40% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $13,520 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 35 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Mississippi. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (40%)
8 points below Mississippi average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Mississippi average (2.6)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
5 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for a resident with chronic pa...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, facility policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective pain managem...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #47
An observation and interview on 4/14/25 at 10:30 AM, revealed Resident #47 lying in bed with his call light secured...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a clean homelike environment f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide nail care for one (1) of sixteen sampled residents reviewed. Resident #22.
Findings Include:
...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to obtain a Level II Preadmission Scre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #28
Record review of Resident # 28's care plan revealed, Clean Stage 2 pressure injury to sacrum with normal saline, ap...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide nai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to clean a residents woun...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possibility...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a Level ll Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #23
Record review of the electronic medical record revealed the following physician's order dated 02/03/22; Ativan Tabl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
An observation on 02/22/22 at 11:48 AM, revealed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #2 took Resident #42's lunch tray, set it on his overbed table and opened his milk and utensils without performing hand...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 40% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $13,520 in fines. Above average for Mississippi. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade C (53/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Louisville Healthcare Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Louisville Healthcare Llc Staffed?
CMS rates LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Louisville Healthcare Llc?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 11 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Louisville Healthcare Llc?
LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by TREND CONSULTANTS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 52 residents (about 87% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LOUISVILLE, Mississippi.
How Does Louisville Healthcare Llc Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Louisville Healthcare Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Louisville Healthcare Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Louisville Healthcare Llc Stick Around?
LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Louisville Healthcare Llc Ever Fined?
LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC has been fined $13,520 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,214. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Louisville Healthcare Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
LOUISVILLE HEALTHCARE LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.