THE NICHOLS CENTER

1308 HIGHWAY 51 NORTH, MADISON, MS 39110 (601) 853-4343
For profit - Corporation 60 Beds BRIAR HILL MANAGEMENT Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
63/100
#53 of 200 in MS
Last Inspection: March 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

The Nichols Center in Madison, Mississippi has a Trust Grade of C+, which indicates it is slightly above average in quality. It ranks #53 out of 200 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among five local facilities in Madison County. However, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 1 in 2022 to 6 in 2024. Staffing is rated well at 4 out of 5 stars, but the turnover rate is average at 49%, which is typical for Mississippi. The center has faced $7,901 in fines, which is average and suggests some compliance issues, but it does have better RN coverage than many facilities, which is important for catching potential problems. Recent inspections revealed serious incidents, such as a resident falling due to improper lift use without adequate staff assistance, leading to injuries, highlighting the need for improved adherence to care protocols. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and rankings, the recent serious incidents and worsening trend indicate areas that require attention.

Trust Score
C+
63/100
In Mississippi
#53/200
Top 26%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 6 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
49% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$7,901 in fines. Higher than 70% of Mississippi facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 44 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Mississippi. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 1 issues
2024: 6 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 49%

Near Mississippi avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $7,901

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: BRIAR HILL MANAGEMENT

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record

3 actual harm
Mar 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for monitoring for side effects and behavior monitoring with the use of psychotropic ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for monitoring for side effects and behavior monitoring with the use of psychotropic medications for (1) one of 16 resident care plans reviewed. Resident #38 Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Care Plans, updated 2/20/20, revealed, Policy: Each resident will have a person-centered plan of care to identify problems, needs and strength that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care . Record review of the March 2024 Medication Administration Record for Resident #38 revealed no monitoring for side effects or targeted behaviors related to antipsychotic, antianxiety, and antidepressant medications. Record review of the care plan titled, Antipsychotic drug use: at risk for side effects, with start date 5/1/23 revealed, Interventions: Monitor patterns of targeted behaviors .Assess for adverse side effects, document, and report . Record review of the care plan titled, Antianxiety drug use: at risk for side effects, with a start date of 5/1/23 revealed, .Interventions Monitor patterns of targeted behaviors .Assess for adverse side effects, document, and report . Record review of the care plan titled, Antidepressant drug use: at risk for side effects, with a start date of 5/1/23 revealed, .Interventions: Monitor patterns of targeted behaviors .Assess for adverse side effects, document, and report . In an interview with the Medical Records/ Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 3/13/24 at 3:00 PM, revealed after review of the psychotropic care plans for Resident #38, staff were not following the care plans. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/13/24 at 3:07 PM, confirmed after review of the care-plans for Resident #38 staff were not following her care plans for behavior/side effect monitoring because there was no documentation of the monitoring and stated the purpose of the care plan is to ensure the resident receives the resident specific care they need. Record review of the Face Sheet revealed that the facility admitted Resident #38 to the facility on 5/27/21 with a diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. Depression, and Anxiety disorder.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to provide services or care that accepted standards of quality dictate should have been provided when staff administered ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to provide services or care that accepted standards of quality dictate should have been provided when staff administered an as needed (prn) antipsychotic medication every 12 hours scheduled for (1) one of (9) nine residents whose medication regimen was reviewed. (Resident #104) Finding include: Review of the policy titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines revealed, .Procedure: . 2. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of attending physicians, taking into consideration manufacturer's specifications, and professional standards of practice .18. Prior to administration, the medication and dosage schedule on the resident MAR (Medication Administration Record) is compared with the medication label, this information should be checked at least three times during the medication preparation process. If the the label and the MAR are different, the physician's orders are checked for the correct dosage schedule prior to administering . Record review of the Physician Order List dated 3/8/24 for Resident #104, revealed Olanzapine 2.5 mg (milligram) 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed times 14 days with time code of Q12 hours (every 12 hours). Record review of the Physician Orders List for Resident #104 dated 3/12/24, revealed Olanzapine 2.5 mg one tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed times 14 days with time code of PRN Q12 (as needed every 12 hours). Record review of the March 2024 MAR for Resident #104 revealed Olanzapine 2.5 mg tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for 14 days scheduled to be administered at 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 on 03/13/24 at 1:24 PM, revealed she cares for Resident #104 and has not seen the resident have any behaviors and has not received any reports from other staff about any behaviors. During an interview with the Medical Records/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 3/13/24 at 3:00 PM, revealed she recognized yesterday that the physician's orders for Olanzapine 2.5 mg for Resident #104 was incorrectly put in the computer and was triggering to be signed off every twelve hours scheduled, but the order was to be every 12 hours as needed, so she contacted the provider and obtained an order correction. She then revealed that she was unable to find any documentation of behaviors for the need to administer the Olanzapine and confirmed the resident should not have received the Olanzapine every 12 hours because that is not what the provider ordered. She then revealed possible negative outcomes from receiving the Olanzapine is that the resident could have become over sedated, have loss of appetite, or Tardive Dyskinesia. During an interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 and CNA #2 on 3/13/24 at 3:10 PM, they both revealed they have not seen or heard of Resident #104 having any behaviors. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/13/24 at 3:40 PM, confirmed that Resident #104 should not have been given the medication ordered as needed Olanzapine without documentation of behaviors requiring the use of the medication . She also confirmed staff did not follow the physician's order when they gave the Olanzapine medication every 12 hours scheduled when the order read every 12 hours as needed. She then revealed the nurses should have recognized the order and the MAR needed to be clarified before administering the Antipsychotic medication, when they checked the five (5) rights of administration. Record review of the Face Sheet revealed that the facility admitted Resident #104 to the facility on 3/08/24 with diagnoses including Depression and Unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity, without behavior/psychosis/mood/anxiety.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary drug use as evidenced by no targeted behavior or side effect monitoring fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary drug use as evidenced by no targeted behavior or side effect monitoring for the use of psychotropic medications (Resident #38) and administered an as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication with no documented targeted behaviors (Resident #104) for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Behavior Management and Psych-Pharmacological Medication Monitoring Protocol, revealed Policy: Residents who receive antipsychotic, anti-depressant, sedative/hypnotic, or anti-anxiety medications are to be maintained at the safest lowest dosage necessary to manage the residents' condition. Residents will be reviewed routinely for effectiveness and monitored for side effects.Purpose: Interventions developed will only include the use of medications when the assessment by the physician and interdisciplinary team have validated that non-chemical interventions alone are not successful. Resident #38 Record review of the Physician Orders List for Res. #38 revealed an order dated 2/18/24 for Celexa 20 MG (milligrams) give one table by mouth once daily, an order dated 9/18/23 for Buspirone HCL 10 MG tablet give one tablet by mouth twice daily and an order dated 3/4/24 for Zyprexa 5 MG tablet give 0.5 tab by mouth every day (hold for sedation). Record review of the March 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Resident #38 received Zyprexa 5 mg (milligram) give 0.5 tablet every day at bedtime (HS) from March 1st through March 3rd (Hold for Sedation), Buspirone 10 mg tablet give one by mouth twice daily March 1st through March 13th and Celexa 20 mg tablet give one tablet by mouth once daily from March 1st through 13th with no documentation of monitoring for side effects or behaviors. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 3/13/24 12:38 PM, revealed residents on psychotropic drugs are monitored for behaviors and side effects every shift and documented on the MAR to determine if a medication is still appropriate for a resident. She confirmed if there was no monitoring potential adverse reactions or behaviors may be missed. An interview with the Medical Records LPN on 3/13/24 at 3:00 PM, revealed she was unable to find any monitoring for side effects of psychotropic medications and no monitoring for targeted behaviors in Resident #38's medical record. She then revealed the purpose of the monitoring of the psychotropic medications is to ensure the resident does not have adverse side effects. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/13/24 at 3:07 PM, confirmed monitoring for side effects and behavior monitoring should be documented on the MAR on all residents receiving psychotropic medications, to ensure they are not having any adverse reactions or increased behaviors, and the provider should be notified of any concerns identified such as over sedation, loss of appetite, or Tardive Dyskinesia. She confirmed there was no documentation for side effects or behavior monitoring for Resident #38. Record review of the Face Sheet revealed that the facility admitted Resident # 38 to the facility on 5/27/21 with a diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, Depression, and Anxiety disorder. Resident #104 Record review of the Physician Orders List for Resident #104, revealed an order dated 3/12/24 Olanzapine 2.5 mg (milligrams) one tablet by mouth every twelve hours as needed times 14 days. Record review of the March 2024 MAR revealed Resident #104 received Olanzapine 2.5 mg one tablet at 8:00 AM March 9th-12th, 8:00 PM the 9th-11th, and at 5:16 AM on the 13th with no documentation of any behaviors on the MAR. An interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 on 3/13/24 at 1:24 PM, she revealed she cares for Resident #104 and has not seen the resident have any behaviors nor has she received any reports from other staff about any behaviors. An interview with the Medical Records LPN on 3/13/24 at 3:05 PM, revealed that she was unable to find any documentation of behaviors for the need to administer the Olanzapine in the medical record. She then revealed possible negative outcomes from receiving the Olanzapine is that the resident could have become over sedated, have loss of appetite, or develop Tardive Dyskinesia. An interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #1 and CNA #2 on 3/13/24 at 3:10 PM, they both revealed they have not seen the Resident #104 have any behaviors and confirmed no one from the other shifts have reported to them any behaviors to them either. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 3/13/24 at 3:40 PM, confirmed Resident #104 should not have been given the PRN Olanzapine without documentation of behaviors requiring the use of the medication. She also revealed monitoring for side effects and behavior monitoring should be documented on all residents receiving psychotropic medications, to ensure they are not having any adverse reactions and the behaviors are not worsening, and to show the continued need for the use of the medications and the provider should be notified of any concerns identified. Record review of the Face Sheet revealed that the facility admitted Resident #104 to the facility on 3/08/24 with Depression and Unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity, without behavior/psychosis/mood/anxiety.
Jan 2024 3 deficiencies 3 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect when a resident was transferred utilizing a total lift without two (2) staff members resulting in the lift overturning and the resident falling to the floor. The resident sustained skin tears and a hematoma to her scalp and required transfer to the emergency department. This was for one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled. Resident #1. Findings include: Policy and procedure review of the facility's Abuse Program last revised May 23, 2017, revealed It is the policy of this facility to take all steps necessary to maintain an environment free of abuse and neglect .Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or services providers to provide good and services necessary to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional stress. Neglect occurs when facility staff fail to monitor and/or supervise the delivery of resident care and services to assure that care is provided as needed by residents. Neglect occurs when a facility fails to provide necessary care for residents . Record review of the facility investigation Reportable Incident Form dated 12/7/23 revealed that CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) #1 attempted to transfer Resident #1 with the total lift without assistance on 12/6/23 at approximately 5:30 PM. CNA #1 admitted that she was trying to transfer Resident #1 to the bed from her wheelchair and did not get assistance from another staff member. The lift fell over when CNA #1 turned toward the bed, and Resident #1 landed on the floor. When the nurses arrived, the lift was removed from the lower legs of Resident #1. It was noted Resident #1 had multiple skin tears which were cleaned and treated. The Medical Director was in the facility and gave the order to send Resident #1 to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment. She returned that night at 10:43 PM with no new orders. CNA #1 was suspended immediately after the incident and her employment terminated. Record review of the emergency room (ER) visit on 12/6/23 of Resident #1 revealed the Assessment/Plan 1. Hematoma of scalp, 2. Skin Tear, 3. Back Pain on page five (5) of 27. Record review of Resident #1 Minor Med Care Progress Note dated 12/7/2023, by the Nurse Practitioner revealed 91 y/o (years old) WF (white female) s/p (status post) fall from Hoyer lift in the facility last night with left temple contusion, left elbow skin tear and right medial ankle skin tear. She denies a headache at this time but she does have tenderness to her right ankle and left elbow from the skin tears. Record review of Resident #1's Lift/Transfer Evaluation dated 10/17/23 revealed she was assessed to require Sling Size: XXL (extra, extra large) Sling. Required Total Lift. Select assistance required: Total lift with 2 assist. Total Lift: sling size: Total lift with X-Large Sling Record review of undated Resident #1's Resident Summary, which is on the kiosk for CNAs use, revealed Bed Mobility Extensive Assistance 2 person, Lift Total Lift, Sling Size XXL sling. Record review of the binder connected to each lift in the facility revealed a LONG TERM CARE GUIDE with Resident #1 required the Total Lift for transfers with 2 staff members and an extra extra large sling. On 1/8/24 at 5:00 PM, during an interview with the Administrator on information needed for a facility reported incident regarding Resident #1 falling from a lift and what happened the Administrator stated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was actually in the facility at the time of the incident working the medication cart. She was Resident #1's assigned nurse that 3-11 shift. CNA #1 was the CNA for Resident #1. CNA #1 attempted to transfer Resident #1 from the wheelchair to bed without getting assistance from another staff member. The CNA turned towards the bed and the lift fell over with Resident #1 in it and she fell onto the floor. CNA #1 admitted she didn't ask for assistance for the Total Lift transfer. She had been recently trained on lift use. She admitted knowing she needed another staff member to assist with the lift but didn't ask anyone. She was suspended that night and terminated after the investigation. He stated, Thank God (Proper Name) Resident #1 wasn't hurt worse. Interview with Resident #1 at 5:15 PM on 1/8/24, revealed that one (1) CNA had attempted to put her in bed using a lift. She stated she doesn't know what happened, but she and the lift fell over. She landed between the bedside table and the head of her bed. She revealed that she had a bump and bruise on her left temple area and some skin tears. Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) on 1/8/24 at 5:45 PM, revealed that she was working on the unit as a medication nurse the 3-11 shift on 12/6/23. She stated that when she came into the room, Resident #1 was on the floor with the lift leaning over. Her head was between the bedside table and bed lying on the floor. She stated she did notice the base of the Total Lift was not spread out to prevent the lift from falling over. CNA #1 admitted to not getting another staff member to assist with the transfer of Resident #1 on the Total Lift. The resident had a skin tear to her left inner arm and on her bilateral lower extremities. She was assessed by nursing staff and 911 called for an ambulance to transfer her to the emergency room for further assessment and treatment. Interview with CNA #1 on 1/9/24 at 1:05 PM, revealed that Resident #1 had been on the light and wanted in bed. She stated, She is a total lift. When asked by the State Agency (SA) if she had asked for help, she stated No. I didn't ask for help. I poked my head out of the door and didn't see anyone, so I tried to lift her alone. She stated, I walked away from the lift toward the bed and the lift fell over. She stated she was attempting to use the total lift to transfer Resident #1 from her wheelchair to the bed without assistance. She denied being trained in abuse, neglect, resident rights, the vulnerable adults act and on lift use. She stated that the information for lift use and other ADL's are located on the kiosk on the walls of the resident halls. She said she thinks there is a folder on the lifts too that have each resident's lift information. Review of CNA #1's personnel file revealed she was hired 9/6/2023. She signed a Lift free facility form and it was dated for 6/9/2023. When the SA interviewed CNA #1 on 1/9/24 at 1:05 PM, she stated that her first day at work was 9/6/23 and she must have accidentally switched the numbers of the date. She signed the abuse/neglect policy for the facility on 9/6/23. She completed the facility's CNAs Skills Check-off on 11/9/23. This included Transfer Using Mechanical Lift. She was terminated from employment on 12/7/23. Record review of the Face Sheet of Resident #1 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with her diagnosis' including Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia, Morbid (severe) Obesity with Alveolar Hypoventilation, Muscle Weakness, and other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #1 with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/17/2023, Section C-Cognitive Patterns Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicated she is able to make daily decisions. Based on the facility's implementation of corrective actions on 12/7/23, the State Agency (SA) determined the deficiency to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the deficiency was corrected as of 12/7/23, prior to the SA's first entrance on 1/8/24. Validation of Past non-compliance: On 12/6/23 the resident was assessed by the Director of Nursing and transferred immediately to the emergency room by ambulance. The Survey agency (SA) validated by record review of the nurses notes and emergency room documentation. The Certified Nursing Assistant involved in the incident was immediately suspended and terminated 12/7/23. This was validated by the SA by reviewing the facility discipline form that revealed the termination of CNA #1. The Resident Representative was notified on 12/6/23 and the Survey Agency and Attorney General's office were notified on 12/7/23. This was validated by the SA from record review and interviews. All CNA's and Nurses were in serviced/retrained starting on 12/7/23 on following the individual care plan related to lift use, the facility policies on Total Lift Use, Abuse and Neglect, Care Plans. This was validated by the SA from sampled staff being interviewed to confirm their attendance, knowledge of the training, observation of lift use and record review of the signed documents of the attendance by the staff. As part of the facility monitoring, inservices will continue on the Total Lift use monthly for CNAs and quarterly for nurses throughout 2024. All nursing new hires will be in-serviced upon hire. All residents care plans, lift instructions, resident summary's (information with access for the CNAs in the Kiosk with guidance for individual lift use), and the binders on all the lifts that contained the individual resident information for specific lift use were audited to ensure correct and consistent information. Sampled residents care plans, lift instructions, resident summary's and binders on the lifts were audited by the Survey Agency to confirm they had consistent and correct information. The SA validated through record review and interview that the facility held a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting on 12/7/23 to discuss the incident with the fall from the Total Lift. On 12/7/23, the Administrator, DON and ADON began monitoring resident halls daily reminding CNAs and nurses of the requirement of always having two staff members when using the Total Lift. The SA was able to validate the actions the facility took after the incident involving Resident #1 and CNA #1 through record review, interviews and observations.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, policy procedure review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, policy procedure review and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (1) of seven (7) residents sampled, Resident #1, as evidenced by on 12/6/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 failed to follow the Resident Care Summary and ADL's (activities of daily living) Care Plan for Resident #1 when she attempted to transfer Resident #1 using the total lift without the assistance of another staff member. Findings include: Policy and procedure review of the facility's Care Plans policy last updated 2/03/2023 revealed, Policy: Each resident will have a person centered plan of care to identify problems, needs and strengths that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care .DEFINITIONS: Resident Care Summary-part of the Comprehensive Care Plan and used as the tool to make staff aware of the resident's daily care needs; serves as ADL care plan . Record review of Resident #1's care plan revealed Requires assistance for all ADL's related to impaired mobility and incontinence with a Start Date 11/24/2020 .Intervention: TOTAL LIFT X (times) 2 person assist with XXL (extra extra large) sling. Record review of the facility investigation Reportable Incident Form dated 12/7/23 revealed that CNA #1 attempted to transfer Resident #1 with the total lift without assistance on 12/6/23 at approximately 5:30 PM. CNA #1 admitted that she was trying to transfer Resident #1 to the bed from her wheelchair and did not get assistance from another staff member. The lift fell over when CNA #1 turned toward the bed, and Resident #1 landed on the floor. When the nurses arrived, the lift was removed from the lower legs of Resident #`1. It was noted resident #1 had multiple skin tears which were cleaned and treated. The Medical Director was in the facility and gave the order to send Resident #1 to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment. She returned that night at 10:43 PM with no new orders. CNA #1 was suspended immediately after the incident and her employment terminated. Record review of undated Resident #1's Resident Summary, which is the care guidance located on the kiosk for CNA use, revealed Bed Mobility Extensive Assistance 2 person, Lift: Total Lift, Sling Size XXL sling. Record review of the binder connected to each lift in the facility revealed a LONG TERM CARE GUIDE with Resident #1 required the Total Lift with 2 person assistance and the 2XL sling. During an interview with Resident #1 on 1/8/24 at 5:15 PM, she stated that one Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) had attempted to put her in bed using a lift. She stated she doesn't know what happened, but she and the lift fell over. She landed between the bedside table and the head of her bed. She revealed that she had a bump and bruise on her left temple area and some skin tears. On 1/8/24 at 5:45 PM, an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) revealed that when she went into Resident#1's room, CNA #1 stated she did not get help to use the Total Lift from another staff member. She stated, No, she did not follow the Resident Summary or the ADL care plan. Both the Resident Summary and the ADL care plan state to have 2 staff members to use the Total Lift. We are a lift free facility which means that staff do not physically lift residents. We use 2 staff always with the Total Lift. During an interview with CNA #1 on 1/9/24 at 1:05 PM, she stated that Resident #1 had been on the light and wanted in bed. She is a total lift. When asked by the State Agency (SA) if she had asked for help, she stated No. I didn't ask for help. I poked my head out of the door and didn't see anyone, so I tried to lift her alone. She stated, I walked away from the lift toward the bed and the lift fell over. She stated she was attempting to use the total lift to transfer Resident #1 from her wheelchair to the bed without assistance. She stated that the information for lift use and other Activities of Daily Living (ADL) are located on the kiosk on the walls of the resident halls. She said she thinks there is a folder on the lifts too that have each resident's lift. During an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) and Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON) on 1/9/24 at 1:55 PM revealed that information used to determine the lift use for a resident is by the residents care and mobility in the hospital, facility therapy department will assess residents for safety reasons and the nurses on admission will also evaluate the resident for lift use and mobility. The evaluation/assessment is done every 90 days and as needed by the Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse. If there are changes on the care plans, it is made in the computer and automatically updates in the kiosk. Record review of the Face Sheet of Resident #1 revealed that she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with her diagnosis' including Chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, Morbid (severe) obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, Muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)-Version 3.0 of Resident #1 with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/17/2023, Section C-Cognitive Patterns Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. She is able to make daily decisions. Based on the facility's implementation of corrective actions on 12/7/23, the State Agency (SA) determined the deficiency to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the deficiency was corrected as of 12/7/23, prior to the SA's first entrance on 1/8/24. Validation of Past non-compliance: On 12/6/23 the resident was assessed by the Director of Nursing and transferred immediately to the emergency room by ambulance. The Survey agency (SA) validated by record review of the nurses notes and emergency room documentation. The Certified Nursing Assistant involved in the incident was immediately suspended and terminated 12/7/23. This was validated by the SA by reviewing the facility discipline form that revealed the termination of CNA #1. The Resident Representative was notified on 12/6/23 and the Survey Agency and Attorney General's office were notified on 12/7/23. This was validated by the SA from record review and interviews. All CNA's and Nurses were in serviced/retrained starting on 12/7/23 on following the individual care plan related to lift use, the facility policies on Total Lift Use, Abuse and Neglect, Care Plans. This was validated by the SA from sampled staff being interviewed to confirm their attendance, knowledge of the training, observation of lift use and record review of the signed documents of the attendance by the staff. As part of the facility monitoring, inservices will continue on the Total Lift use monthly for CNAs and quarterly for nurses throughout 2024. All nursing new hires will be in-serviced upon hire. All residents care plans, lift instructions, resident summary's (information with access for the CNAs in the Kiosk with guidance for individual lift use), and the binders on all the lifts that contained the individual resident information for specific lift use were audited to ensure correct and consistent information. Sampled residents care plans, lift instructions, resident summary's and binders on the lifts were audited by the Survey Agency to confirm they had consistent and correct information. The SA validated through record review and interview that the facility held a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting on 12/7/23 to discuss the incident with the fall from the Total Lift. On 12/7/23, the Administrator, DON and ADON began monitoring resident halls daily reminding CNAs and nurses of the requirement of always having two staff members when using the Total Lift. The SA was able to validate the actions the facility took after the incident involving Resident #1 and CNA #1 through record review, interviews and observations.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and facility policy/procedure review, the facility failed to ensure an environment that is fre...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and facility policy/procedure review, the facility failed to ensure an environment that is free from accident hazards and provide the necessary supervision to prevent injury for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents, Resident #1. Findings include: Policy and procedure review of the facility's Total Lift Vanderlift II, last Updated 2/3/2023 revealed the Responsibility: All Licensed Nursing Personnel and All Other Staff Providing Care to Resident or Lifting. Two people are required to operate the Total Lift. Record review of the facility investigation Reportable Incident Form dated 12/7/23 revealed that CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) #1 attempted to transfer Resident #1 with the total lift without assistance on 12/6/23 at approximately 5:30 PM. CNA #1 admitted that she was trying to transfer Resident #1 to the bed from her wheelchair and did not get assistance from another staff member. The lift fell over when CNA #1 turned toward the bed, and Resident #1 landed on the floor. When the nurses arrived, the lift was removed from the lower legs of Resident #1. It was noted Resident #1 had multiple skin tears which were cleaned and treated. The Medical Director was in the facility and gave the order to send Resident #1 to the hospital for further evaluation and treatment. She returned that night at 10:43 PM with no new orders. CNA #1 was suspended immediately after the incident and her employment terminated. Record review of Resident #1's the emergency room (ER) visit on 12/6/23 revealed the Assessment/Plan 1. Hematoma of scalp, 2. Skin Tear, 3. Back Pain on page five (5) of 27. Record review of Resident #1 Minor Med Care Progress Note dated 12/7/2023, by the Nurse Practitioner revealed 91 y/o (years old) WF (white female) s/p (status post) fall from Hoyer lift in the facility last night with left temple contusion left elbow skin tear and right medial ankle skin tear. She denies a headache at this time but she does have tenderness to her right ankle and left elbow from the skin tears. Record review of Resident #1's Lift/Transfer Evaluation dated 10/17/23 revealed she was assessed to require an XXL (extra extra large) Sling with the Total lift with the assistance of 2 staff members. Record review of undated Resident #1's Resident Summary, which is on the kiosk for CNA use, revealed Bed Mobility Extensive Assistance 2 person, Lift Total Lift, Sling Size XXL sling. Record review of the binder connected to each lift in the facility revealed a LONG TERM CARE GUIDE with Resident #1 required the Total Lift with 2 person assistance and the XXL sling. Interview with the Administrator on 1/8/24 at 5:00 PM, reviewing information needed for a facility reported incident regarding Resident #1 falling from a lift and what happened the Administrator stated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was actually in the facility at the time of the incident working the medication cart. She was Resident #1's assigned nurse that 3-11 shift. CNA #1 was the CNA for Resident #1. CNA #1 attempted to transfer Resident #1 from the wheelchair to bed without getting assistance from another staff member. The CNA turned towards the bed and the lift fell over with Resident #1 in it and she fell onto the floor. CNA #1 admitted she didn't ask for assistance for the Total Lift transfer. She had been recently trained on lift use. She admitted knowing she needed another staff member to assist with the lift but didn't ask anyone. She was suspended that night and terminated after the investigation. He stated, Thank God (Proper Name) Resident #1 wasn't hurt worse. On 1/8/24 at 5:15 PM, an interview with Resident #1 revealed her saying that one Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) had attempted to put her in bed using a lift. She stated she doesn't know what happened, but she and the lift fell over. She landed between the bedside table and the head of her bed. She revealed that she had a bump and bruise on her left temple area and some skin tears. On 1/8/24 at 5:45 PM an interview with the ADON revealed that she was working on the unit as a medication nurse on the 3-11 shift on 12/6/23. She stated that when she came into the room, Resident #1 was on the floor with the lift leaning over. Her head was between the bedside table and bed lying on the floor. She stated she did notice the base of the Total Lift was not spread out to prevent the lift from falling over. CNA #1 admitted to not getting another staff member to assist with the transfer of Resident #1 on the Total Lift. The resident had a skin tear to her left inner arm and on her bilateral lower extremities. She was assessed by nursing staff and 911 called for an ambulance to transfer her to the emergency room for further assessment and treatment. On 1/9/24 at 1:05 PM an interview with CNA #1 revealed that Resident #1 had been on the light and wanted in bed. She is a total lift. When asked by the State Agency (SA) if she had asked for help, she stated No. I didn't ask for help. I poked my head out of the door and didn't see anyone, so I tried to lift her alone. She stated, I walked away from the lift toward the bed and the lift fell over. She stated she was attempting to use the total lift to transfer Resident #1 from her wheelchair to the bed without assist. She denied being trained in abuse, neglect, resident rights, the vulnerable act and on lift use. Record review of CNA #1's personnel file revealed she was hired 9/6/2023. She signed a Lift free facility form and it was dated for 6/9/2023. When the State Agency (SA) interviewed CNA #1 on 1/9/24 at 1:05 PM, she stated that her first day at work was 9/6/23 and she must have accidentally switched the numbers. She signed the abuse/neglect policy for the facility on 9/6/23. She completed the facility's CNAs Skills Check-off on 11/9/23. This included Transfer Using Mechanical Lift. She was terminated from employment on 12/7/23. Record review of the Face Sheet of Resident #1 revealed that she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with her diagnosis' including Chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, Morbid (severe) obesity with alveolar hypoventilation, Muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)-Version 3.0 of Resident #1 with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/17/2023, Section C-Cognitive Patterns Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15. She is able to make daily decisions. Based on the facility's implementation of corrective actions on 12/7/23, the State Agency (SA) determined the deficiency to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC) and the deficiency was corrected as of 12/7/23, prior to the SA's first entrance on 1/8/24. Validation of Past non-compliance: On 12/6/23 the resident was assessed by the Director of Nursing and transferred immediately to the emergency room by ambulance. The Survey agency (SA) validated by record review of the nurses notes and emergency room documentation. The Certified Nursing Assistant involved in the incident was immediately suspended and terminated 12/7/23. This was validated by the SA by reviewing the facility discipline form that revealed the termination of CNA #1. The Resident Representative was notified on 12/6/23 and the Survey Agency and Attorney General's office were notified on 12/7/23. This was validated by the SA from record review and interviews. All CNA's and Nurses were in serviced/retrained starting on 12/7/23 on following the individual care plan related to lift use, the facility policies on Total Lift Use, Abuse and Neglect, Care Plans. This was validated by the SA from sampled staff being interviewed to confirm their attendance, knowledge of the training, observation of lift use and record review of the signed documents of the attendance by the staff. As part of the facility monitoring, inservices will continue on the Total Lift use monthly for CNAs and quarterly for nurses throughout 2024. All nursing new hires will be in-serviced upon hire. All residents care plans, lift instructions, resident summary's (information with access for the CNAs in the Kiosk with guidance for individual lift use), and the binders on all the lifts that contained the individual resident information for specific lift use were audited to ensure correct and consistent information. Sampled residents care plans, lift instructions, resident summary's and binders on the lifts were audited by the Survey Agency to confirm they had consistent and correct information. The SA validated through record review and interview that the facility held a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting on 12/7/23 to discuss the incident with the fall from the Total Lift. On 12/7/23, the Administrator, Director of Nursing and ADON began monitoring resident halls daily reminding CNAs and nurses of the requirement of always having two staff members when using the Total Lift. The SA was able to validate the actions the facility took after the incident involving Resident #1 and CNA #1 through record review, interviews and observations.
Dec 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to date oxygen,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff and resident interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to date oxygen, nebulizer tubing, and humidifier bottles and place oxygen signage on the doors for three (3) of 14 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. Resident #2, Resident #100, and Resident #149 and no physician order for oxygen for two (2) of three (3) residents. Resident #2 and Resident #149 Findings include: Resident #2 A record review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen-Administration, Concentrator, Storage & Assemblage, dated August 17, 2015, revealed the Purpose: To provide adequate tissue oxygenation by providing supplemental oxygen. Oxygen Safety: 14. Post the NO SMOKING -OXYGEN IN USE sign on the door in the resident's room. Instructions for Humidifier bottle: 1. When bottle is empty or essentially empty, detach the flow gauge and date and reattach a new prefilled bottle. A record review of the facility's policy titled Physician Orders-Transcribing and Implementing, dated August 17,2015, revealed the Purpose: It is the policy of the facility that all physician's orders will be implemented timely and carried out in a professional manner by the nursing staff. The nurse receiving the physician's orders, whether verbal or in writing, must assure that orders are transcribed properly and implemented. An observation on 11/28/22 at 8:52 PM, revealed Resident #2 receiving Oxygen (O2) at 2 liters Per Minute (LPM) via nasal canula with no label or date on the tubing and humidifier bottle and no O2 in use sign on the resident's door. An observation, on 11/29/22 at 8:35 AM, revealed Resident #2's O2 tubing and humidifier bottle not labeled or dated and no O2 in use sign on the resident's door. An observation and interview, with Resident # 2 on 11/29/22 at 1:33 PM, revealed O2 tubing unlabeled and undated and no sign on door and resident #2 confirmed she had been wearing oxygen for years. Record review of Resident #2's Physician's orders revealed no order for oxygen therapy and review the medication record revealed oxygen with a discontinue date of 11/04/22. An observation and interview on 11/29/22 at 3:00 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified she was unable to find an order for oxygen use in Resident #2's record and stated somehow a stop date was entered removing the order from the medication record. She confirmed the order should not have been stopped. The DON confirmed all residents on oxygen should have a physician's order. The DON also confirmed the oxygen tubing was not labeled or dated and should be changed weekly, labeled and dated. The DON verified the was not a smoking sign and one should be in view on the the resident's door. The DON confirmed a possible complication from not dating the tubing and not having smoking signs in view is a fire or infection. Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure with hypercapnia and Morbid obesity with Alveolar Hypoventilation. Record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Section C with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/02/22 revealed Resident# 2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating she was cognitively intact. Resident #149 An observation on 11/29/22 at 9:31 AM, revealed Resident #149 receiving Oxygen (O2) at 2 liters/LPM by nasal canula with the tubing and the humidifier bottle not labeled or dated and no O2 in use sign on the resident's door. An observation, on 11/29/22 at 1:34 PM, revealed the O2 tubing, and humidifier bottle not labeled or dated and no O2 in use sign on resident's door. An interview, with Resident #149 on 11/29/22 at 1:33 PM, revealed she has been wearing oxygen for years. An observation and interview, with the DON on 11/29/22 at 3:00 PM, confirmed she was unable to find an order for oxygen use for Resident #149 and confirmed all residents on Oxygen should have a physician's order. The DON also confirmed the oxygen tubing was not labeled and confirmed it should be changed, labeled and dated every week and a no smoking sign should be in view on the the resident's door. The DON confirmed a possible complication from not dating the tubing and not having smoking signs in view is a fire or infection. An interview, with the Administrator on 11/30/22 at 8:15 AM confirmed that the facility is a no smoking facility, but no smoking signs should be in view from all rooms with oxygen in use and confirmed a potential hazard is a fire or combustion. Record review of the physician orders revealed there was no physicians order for oxygen therapy. Record review for Resident #149 revealed an admission date of 11/23/22, with diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, and Edema. Record review of the admission MDS) Section C with an ARD of 11/29/22 revealed Resident# 149 had a BIMS of 13, she was cognitively intact. Resident #100 An observation, on 11/28/22 at 08:19 PM revealed oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle was not dated and no bag noted for storage. The nebulizer was laying on the bedside table, not in a bag. Resident #100 stated that he uses oxygen and nebulizer treatments. An observation, on 11/29/22 at 1:45 PM revealed Resident #100 wearing his oxygen. The oxygen tubing was not dated. The nebulizer tubing was not dated. An interview, on 11/29/22 at 1:48 PM with Resident #100 revealed that he did not think they had a routine for changing the tubing. He confirmed his nebulizer was not in a bag yesterday. An interview, on 11/30/22 at 9:00 AM with the administrator (ADM) revealed if a resident has oxygen, their tubing should be dated, a bag for storage should be in the room and there should be a sign on the door. Record review revealed a physician order dated 11/16/22 for Oxygen (O2) at 3 liters via nasal canula. A physician's order dated 11/15/22 revealed Iprat-Albut 0.5-3(2.5) milligrams (mg) /3 millimeters (ml). Inhale 3 mls per hand held nebulizer three times daily and Acetylcysteine 20% vial inhale 3 ml per hand held nebulizer three times daily for thirty days. Record review of the five day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), Section C, revealed Resident #100 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #100's face sheet revealed an admission date of 11/15/22. admission diagnoses included: Lobar Pneumonia, Chronic Respiratory Failure, and Malignant Neoplasm of part of bronchus or lung.
Dec 2019 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on facility policy review, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to medications for two (2) of 18 care plans reviewed, Resident #24...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy review, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to medications for two (2) of 18 care plans reviewed, Resident #24 and Resident #11. Findings include: Review of the facility's Care Plans policy, not dated, revealed each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs and strengths that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. Responsibility: All members of the interdisciplinary team. Monitored by the MDS (Minimum Data Set) and Director of Nurses. Procedures included: The care plan will be reviewed and revised at quarterly intervals in conjunction with the completion of MDS assessments (quarterly, significant change, annual) and with changes in resident's condition as needed. Upon a change in condition, the care plan will be updated or an initial care plan will be initiated. Resident #11 Review of Resident #11's diagnoses included Primary Pulmonary Hypertension, Essential Hypertension, Chronic Systolic Heart Failure, and Chronic Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order, dated 11/19/19, for Warfarin 3 Milligrams (mg) on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday due to Atrial Fibrillation; and, Warfarin 2 mg on Tuesday and Thursday due to Atrial Fibrillation. An order, dated 9/26/17, for Nifedipine ER (Extended Release) 30 mg take 2 tablets daily for Hypertension. An order, dated 2/19/19, for Furosemide 20 mg daily for Heart Failure. An order, dated 9/26/17, for Lisinopril 10 mg twice daily due to Hypertension, and an order, dated 9/26/17, for Sildenafil 20 mg 3 times daily due to Hypertension. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #11 revealed no care plan was developed for the cardiovascular diagnoses or medications. On 12/03/19 at 12:31 PM, an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1/Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator confirmed there was no care plan developed for Resident #11 related to cardiovascular diagnoses or medications. RN #1 revealed she does not know why there was not a care plan, she thought there had been one developed. RN #1 revealed there should be a care plan developed for any medications and diagnosis. Resident #24 Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #24 revealed no care plan developed for the medication Eliquis and its potential side effects. Review of Resident #24's physician's orders revealed an order, dated 1/19/19, for Eliquis 2.5 mg tablet take one tablet by mouth twice daily for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. On 12/04/19 at 12:31 PM, an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1/ Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator confirmed there was no care plan developed for Resident #24 related to Eliquis or interventions related to the anticoagulant medication. RN #1 revealed she does not know why there was not a care plan, she thought there had been one developed. RN #1 revealed there should be a care plan developed for any anticoagulants.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on facility policy review, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for nutrition for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed, Resident #9. Findings include: Review...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on facility policy review, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise a care plan for nutrition for one (1) of 18 residents reviewed, Resident #9. Findings include: Review of the facility's Care Plans policy, not dated, revealed each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs and strengths that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. Responsibility: All members of the interdisciplinary team. Monitored by the MDS (Minimum Data Set) and Director of Nurses. Procedures included: The care plan will be reviewed and revised at quarterly intervals in conjunction with the completion of MDS assessments (quarterly, significant change, annual) and with changes in resident's condition as needed. Upon a change in condition, the care plan will be updated or an initial care plan will be initiated. Resident #9 Review of the December 2019 physician's orders revealed an order, dated 11/22/19, for a Mechanical Soft Diet. Review of the care plan, with a start date of 6/12/19, revealed, Problem, Inadequate nutritional intake: Protein Calorie Malnutrition, PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) tube for nutrition, at risk for alteration in nutrition status, at risk for alteration in hydration status, resident is nothing by mouth (NPO) and receives nutrition by Percutaneous Gastrostomy Tube (PEG) tube only, at risk for aspiration, Category: Nutrition. The Mechanical Soft Diet was not care planned for Resident #9. Interview on 12/03/19, at 11:36 AM, with Registered Nurse #1 (RN)/Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, revealed RN#1 confirmed the Mechanical Soft Diet was not care planned and stated it should have been care planned. She stated the purpose of a care plan would be to describe how the resident should be cared for. RN #1 stated that care plans should be updated quarterly, yearly and with changes. She revealed that when the new order is taken, the care plan should be updated soon after. She confirmed it is the policy of the facility to update the care plan with changes and the policy was not followed. Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #9 was admitted by the facility, on 5/30/19, with diagnoses which included Aftercare Following Joint Replacement Surgery, Gastrostomy Status, Dysphagia, and Dementia in Other Diseases.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, record review, facility policy review, manufacturer's recommendation, and review of the Mississippi Nursing Practice Law, the facility failed...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, record review, facility policy review, manufacturer's recommendation, and review of the Mississippi Nursing Practice Law, the facility failed to administer a metered dose inhaler per manufacturers recommendations for one (1) of five (5) residents observed for medication administration, Resident #2. Findings include: Review of the Mississippi Nursing Practice Law, with an effective date of July 1, 2010, revealed on pages three (3) and four (4) of 26: 73-15-5 Definitions. (2) The practice of nursing by a registered nurse means the performance for compensation of services which requires substantial knowledge of biological, physical, behavioral, psychological, and sociological sciences, and of nursing theory as the basis for assessment, diagnosis, planning intervention, and evaluation in the promotion, maintenance of health; management of individual's responses, to illness, injury or infirmity; the restoration of optimum function; or the achievement of a dignified death. Nursing practice includes, but is not limited to, administration, teaching, counseling, delegation, and supervision of nursing, and execution of the medical regimen, including the administration of medications, and treatments prescribed by any licensed or legally authorized physician, or dentist. (5) The practice of nursing by a licensed practical nurse means the performance for compensation of services requiring basic knowledge of the biological, physical, behavioral, psychological, and sociological sciences, and of nursing procedures which do not require the substantial skill, judgement, and knowledge required of a registered nurse. These services are performed under the direction of a registered nurse, or a licensed physician, or licensed dentist, and utilize standardized procedures in the observation, and care of the ill, injured, and infirm; in the maintenance of health; in action to safeguard life and health; and in the administration of medications, and treatments prescribed by any licensed physician, or licensed dentist authorized by state law to prescribe. Review of the facility's Oral Inhalation Administration policy, not dated, revealed the policy is to allow for correct administration of oral inhalers to residents and for instruction in proper technique for those residents able to administer the medication to themselves. The procedure instructions guide staff to instruct the resident to breath out through their mouth, inhale slowly over three (3) to five (5) seconds as they depress the canister to release the medication, to hold their breath for 10 seconds and then to exhale slowly. Instructions include if there are repeat doses the resident is to breathe normally for one (1) minute, wait one (1) to two (2) minutes and repeat the steps. Review of the Advair HFA inhaler manufacture's insert revealed steps for use included breathe out through your mouth and push as much air from your lungs as you can. Put the mouthpiece in your mouth and close your lips around it. Push the top of the metal canister all the way down while you breathe in deeply and slowly through your mouth. Hold your breath for about 10 seconds, or for as long as is comfortable. Breathe out slowly as long as you can. Wait about 30 seconds and shake the inhaler well for five (5) seconds and repeat steps. On 12/03/19 at 8:50 AM, an observation during the medication pass revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 handed the Advair metered dose inhaler to Resident #2. Resident #2 placed the inhaler in her mouth and pressed the top of the canister two (2) times, one right after the other, without exhaling, taking a deep breath, shaking the canister or waiting for 30 seconds. LPN #1 did not instruct Resident #2 on the proper use. Review of Resident #2's December 2019 physician's orders revealed an order, dated 11/18/19, for Advair HFA 115-21 MCG (Microgram)inhaler-2 puffs inhalation every 12 hours. On 12/03/19 at 8:50 AM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN) #1 confirmed she did not instruct Resident #2 before or during the administration of the Advair inhaler. LPN #1 confirmed Resident #2 did not wait 30 seconds between puffs and did not shake the inhaler between puffs. LPN #1 confirmed the Advair insert revealed in the steps for how to use the inhaler to breathe out, place inhaler in your mouth, dispense medication and inhale, hold your breath 10 seconds, wait 30 seconds, shake canister for five (5) seconds and repeat steps. LPN #1 revealed that by not waiting 30 seconds and following the instructions the resident would not get the most effect of the medication in her lungs and it may not help her breathing as much as it should. On 12/03/19 at 9:00 AM, an interview with Resident #2 confirmed she did not know she should wait 30 seconds between the 2 puffs of her Advair and had not been waiting. Resident #2 revealed no one had told her to wait between puffs, but she is glad she now knows because she wants her medicine to work the best it can. Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet revealed the diagnosis of Asthma.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food storage to prevent the likelihood of food borne illness for on...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food storage to prevent the likelihood of food borne illness for one (1) of two (2) dietary tours. Findings include: Review of the facility's Storage of Refrigerated Food policy, originated 9/04, revealed: Policy: The facility ensures the quality and safety of refrigerated foods through accepted storage practices. Procedure: 3. Food taken out of original containers is put in a clean sanitized container with a tight fitting lid. No food is left uncovered. 4. All non-hazardous, opened foods are labeled with name of food and date stored. 5. All hazardous foods are labeled with the name of food and date to be discarded or the date stored. Cooked foods should not be held longer than 48 hours. Review of the facility's Storage of Canned and Dry Food policy, originated 9/04, revealed: Procedure: 6. Opened products are stored in tightly covered containers. Zip lock bags may be used. 7. Opened packages are labeled with name of product and date opened. Review of the facility's Employee Sanitation Practices policy, dated 9/04, revealed: Policy: Food service employees shall follow sanitary practices to prevent the spread of foodborne illness and reduce those practices which result in food contamination and compromised food safety. Procedure:. 2. b. Gloves are worn to protect food by creating a barrier between the hand and food but should be used only when doing one task. c. Gloves should be changed: i. As soon as they become soiled or torn, ii. Before beginning a different task. On 12/02/19 10:10 AM, an observation during the dietary tour with Dietary Staff #2/Cook, revealed the microwave oven's entire inside was splattered with a cream color dried matter. In the refrigerator there was an open package of 160 slices of Yellow Pasteurized Processed American Cheese slices with approximately one half (1/2) of the 160 slices present and open to air. A fourth of a head of iceberg lettuce was wrapped in plastic wrap with no label or date. [NAME] Onions, approximately 8 in. x 12 in. x 2 in. were wrapped in original packaging and clear plastic wrap with an 11/6/19 date. The green onions were turning brown and mushy/slimy. There was one half of a meat and cheese sandwich on wheat bread wrapped in plastic wrap that was not labeled or dated. A gallon zip lock bag 1/4 full of what appeared to be red peppers or pimento type food was not labeled or dated. In the freezer, a 6x 6 plastic container with a lid contained what appeared to be green beans not labeled or dated. A full gallon zip lock bag of frozen macaroni type material was not labeled or dated. In the pantry, a 50 pound (lb) paper bag of sugar was open with a date of 11/30/19 and loosely rolled down from the top. It contained approximately six (6) inches depth of sugar in the bottom of the bag. A 50 lb. paper bag of Buttermilk Biscuit Mix with a date of 4/24/19, was open and loosely rolled down from the top. It contained approximately 8 inch depth of mix in the bottom of the bag. One half package of Dry Fruit Punch mix was wrapped in plastic wrap and stored in the original box. No open date was on the plastic wrap. Punch mix crystals were falling out of the plastic wrap into the box. An interview with Dietary Staff #2 at this time revealed that all food should be labeled and dated after opening and wrapped tightly. She stated that she would throw it away. She stated that workers on the other shift probably did not label the food. During an observation of the tray line temperatures and interview, on 12/2/19, at 11:15 AM, revealed Dietary Staff #2 wiped the thermometer probe with gloved fingers between each food tempted. She stated, I thought it was ok, it's all going to the same place. She took several pieces of Country Fried Steak from the large steam pan and placed it in a smaller steam pan. She tore the steak up with her fingers to make the chopped steak. She then wiped her gloves with a dish cloth that was lying on the counter of the steam table and spooned Black Eyed Peas, Carrots, and Corn Bread into smaller steam pans to make pureed foods. She stated, It's the dish cloth I clean with. She took the foods and the dish cloth over to the preparation table by the blender and proceeded to make the pureed food. She then wiped the counter with the same dish cloth. In an interview and observation, on 12/02/19, at 10:45 AM, with the Administrator, he confirmed the cheese was not wrapped, the lettuce, sandwich, red peppers/pimento type food in the refrigerator and the frozen macaroni type food, and green beans were not labeled and dated. He confirmed the sugar and biscuit mix were not sealed properly and the Fruit Punch dry mix was not labeled, dated, and sealed properly. He stated the cheese could become spoiled and molded, the green onions should be thrown away due to the brown, mushy appearance, and that all foods not labeled and stored properly should be discarded due to the risk of food borne illness. He stated, If its not labeled, we don't know what it is and it should not be used. He confirmed that the microwave needs attention. An interview, on 12/4/19 at 10:00 AM, with the Dietary Staff #1/Dietary Manager, he stated that dry foods should be stored in a sealed container because something might get in it if the bag was folded over. He stated that all foods that have been opened or refrigerated should be labeled and dated. He stated Residents could get sick if you serve something out of date. In regards to the tray line temps and dish cloth, he stated that It could contaminate things and make residents sick. You are supposed to throw gloves away and wash hands. You must change gloves between different tasks. Meats should be put in the chopper, not torn by hand. Review of an In-Service Form, Subject: Infection Control. How to decrease bacteria growth in food to reduce the likelihood of food borne illness in the residents eating food prepared by dietary, presented by the Registered Dietitian, on 10/29/19, revealed that Dietary Staff #2 attended. Contents of the in-service include, According to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), cloths used for wiping counters and other surfaces shall be: 1) Held between uses in a chemical sanitizer solution All items stored in refrigerators must be covered, labeled, and dated with an open/expiration date.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 11 deficiencies on record, including 3 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 63/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is The Nichols Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns THE NICHOLS CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is The Nichols Center Staffed?

CMS rates THE NICHOLS CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 49%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at The Nichols Center?

State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at THE NICHOLS CENTER during 2019 to 2024. These included: 3 that caused actual resident harm and 8 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates The Nichols Center?

THE NICHOLS CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BRIAR HILL MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 55 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MADISON, Mississippi.

How Does The Nichols Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, THE NICHOLS CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (49%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Nichols Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is The Nichols Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, THE NICHOLS CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at The Nichols Center Stick Around?

THE NICHOLS CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 49%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was The Nichols Center Ever Fined?

THE NICHOLS CENTER has been fined $7,901 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,158. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is The Nichols Center on Any Federal Watch List?

THE NICHOLS CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.