COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION

501 SOUTH LOCUST STREET, MCCOMB, MS 39648 (601) 684-8111
For profit - Limited Liability company 145 Beds CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE LIVING CENTERS/NSPIRE HEALTHCARE/RAYDIANT HEALTH CARE Data: November 2025 8 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#153 of 200 in MS
Last Inspection: January 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Courtyard Health and Rehabilitation has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #153 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi places it in the bottom half, and as the lowest-rated option in Pike County, families may want to consider other alternatives. The facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 3 in 2024 to 7 in 2025, highlighting a troubling trend. Staffing is rated average with a turnover rate of 42%, which is below the state average, suggesting some stability among staff. However, the facility has incurred $154,888 in fines, which is higher than 94% of Mississippi facilities, and there have been critical incidents where residents did not receive necessary medical services, resulting in severe health issues such as hospitalization and infection. This combination of strengths and weaknesses suggests that families should proceed with caution when considering this nursing home for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Mississippi
#153/200
Bottom 24%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
3 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
42% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$154,888 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Mississippi. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
30 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 3 issues
2025: 7 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (42%)

    6 points below Mississippi average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Mississippi average (2.6)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 42%

Near Mississippi avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $154,888

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 30 deficiencies on record

8 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Aug 2025 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide supervision and implement effective elopement prevention strategies for one (1) of four (4) s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide supervision and implement effective elopement prevention strategies for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a known cognitive impairment and elopement risk, resulting in an incident of elopement.The facility's failure to ensure supervision and implement interventions-including failure to detect the resident's absence promptly, and failure to secure exit doors-resulted in Resident #1 exiting the facility through the front entrance without staff knowledge and being unsupervised in the community for approximately one (1) hour and twenty-nine (29) minutes. The resident was found approximately two (2) miles away at a local business after receiving a ride from an unknown individual. This failure placed Resident #1 in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death, given the resident's severe cognitive impairment, multiple medical diagnoses, and the environmental risks encountered during elopement (e.g., traffic, extreme heat, lack of supervision).The facility's failure to ensure supervision and implement interventions for Resident #1, who was an elopement risk, put this resident and all other residents at risk for wandering and elopement, at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death.This situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC), which began on 08/07/2025, when Resident #1 exited the facility unsupervised and without authorization. The State Agency (SA) notified the Administrator of the Immediate Jeopardy on 08/11/2025 at 4:15 PM and provided an IJ Template.The State Agency (SA) validated the Corrective Action Plan on 8/13/25 and determined that the IJ was removed on 8/9/25, prior to exit. Findings include:Record review of the facility policy titled, Missing Patient/Resident with Revision Date 8/01/2020 revealed, OVERVIEW: Staff will investigate cases of missing patient/resident and possible elopement. An elopement occurs when a patient/resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization and/or any necessary supervision to do so, placing the patient/resident at risk for harm or injury. Record review of the facility policy Accident and incident Investigation with Effective Date 11/30/2014 revealed, Policy: Certain Accidents and Incidents.will be investigated to determine root cause and provide for opportunity to decrease future occurrences of the event. Record review of the facility policy Elopement/Wandering Risk Guideline with Revision Date 8/01/2020 revealed, Overview: To evaluate and identify patient/residents that are at risk for elopement and develop individualized interventions.Record review of the Incident Report dated 8/07/25 revealed documentation of the elopement and return without injury of Resident #1 on 8/07/25.Record review of the facility Verification of Investigation dated 8/07/25 revealed on 8/7/25 at 11:10 AM the nurse discovered Resident #1 was unable to be located. Facility staff called a Code Yellow and searched for the resident. The local police department and the Resident Representative (RR) were notified. At 11:53 AM the local police department notified the facility the resident had been found. At 12:05 PM, the Resident returned to the facility and was assessed by the Nurse Practitioner with no injury noted. On 8/11/25 at 10:10 AM, during a record review of the Facility Investigation and Incident Report both dated 8/7/25 and an interview with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON), revealed the DON reported that the elopement of Resident #1 was discovered when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 realized she no longer saw the resident sitting in the lobby where he had been last observed at or around 10:30 AM. The DON reported that she was on D Hall at approximately 10:45 AM when LPN #1 reported to her that she was unable to locate Resident #1. The DON immediately notified the Administrator at approximately 11:10 AM. At approximately 11:15 AM the DON notified the Administrator and called a CODE YELLOW using the overhead public announcement (PA) system. They reported that the resident was last seen seated in a chair in the lobby facing the reception desk and main entrance at approximately 10:30 AM in the lobby across from the front door. The DON and Administrator both said that in separate interviews with the resident upon return to the facility he had told them that he left the facility through the front door when visitors were coming in/going out. The Administrator and DON both confirmed that the resident was last observed in the facility at approximately 10:30 AM and was out of the facility unattended by staff for approximately one hour and twenty-nine minutes when he was observed at a local laundromat two (2) miles from the facility with no obvious injury. They explained that the system of how staff was made aware of a missing resident included word of mouth and Code Yellow announced over the overhead PA system. They explained that they call the alert anytime a resident couldn't be located and hadn't signed out using the alert, Code Yellow which was called at 11:20 AM on 8/07/25. The Administrator confirmed the report by the DON that the Administrator had been notified of a missing resident at 11:15 AM on 8/07/25 after the DON was notified at approximately 11:10 AM, and the Resident Representative for Resident #1 was called at 11:24 AM but the telephone number was out of service and the DON called the resident's daughter at 11:26 AM, and the NP for the resident's physician was notified at 11:20 AM. The DON said that she had conducted a body audit and found no injuries and the NP completed an assessment and noted no injuries and the resident was not transferred to the hospital. They said the immediate response of the facility was that the staff searched for resident, the resident was returned to the facility via Unit Manager, the NP was present at the facility upon the resident's return and assessed resident, which included a Body Audit, and finally one-on-one supervision was provided for Resident #1 for 48 hours and a wander guard anklet was applied to the resident's ankle immediately. The DON and Administrator said the police were notified, but during interview in the Administrator's office, The Unit Manager notified the resident had been located and was in route back to the facility at 11:46 AM, so they were not sure if a police report was written or not. The DON reported that elopement was reported to the State Agency on 8/07/25 at 1:28 PM. They reported that the Maintenance Supervisor checked the security of the doors at 1:00 PM on 8/07/25 as well as every day shift, Monday through Friday, and the residents' wander guard units were checked by the nurses as well as each night. The DON reported that she conducted Missing Resident/Elopement Drills every three months (quarterly) by DON in accordance with facility policy. The DON reported that In-Service Training for all staff was started on 8/07/25. The DON confirmed that the facility did routine audits to ensure elopement books and daily care guides were accurate. The Administrator and DON confirmed that a Census Audit was conducted, and the presence of all other residents not signed out was confirmed via direct observation by the nursing staff. The DON and record review of the Care Plan for Resident #1 revealed that Resident #1's care plan was revised/updated after the elopement on 8/7/25.On 8/11/25, the SA attempted multiple times to contact the RR and Contact #1 for Resident #1 without success and no mechanism to leave a message. On 8/13/25 during a telephone interview with Contact #1 for Resident #1, his family member confirmed that the facility had notified her on 8/07/25 that Resident #1 had eloped and that he had been returned to the facility.On 8/11/25 at 10:25 AM, observation and an interview with Resident #1 in his room revealed Resident #1 stated that he was from a nearby town where his family lived, approximately twenty-five miles away. He confirmed that he had eye surgery which had greatly improved his vision. He stated that he was able to get himself up and walk with his cane but used his wheelchair for longer distances. He said he remembered on 8/07/25 going out the front main entrance and getting a ride with a man in a truck to a nearby avenue. He stated that his ultimate goal was to get to his former residence. He said that the man in the truck dropped him off at the local business and that facility staff had shown up and given him a ride back to the facility. Observation revealed the resident had a wander guard safe wandering device on his left ankle. On 8/11/25 at 10:45 AM, during an interview LPN #1 stated she observed Resident #1 walking with a walker, and that he had taken a seat in the lobby across from the reception desk and main front entrance at approximately 10:00 AM wearing a black sock cap, a short-sleeved button up shirt, a pair of blue jeans and slide on shoes, holding his cane. She stated that at approximately 10:50 AM, she had begun to look for him and he was no longer sitting in the lobby, nor was he in the dining room or common areas and was not in his room. She said that after looking in those areas, at approximately 11:00 AM she notified the DON that she could not locate the resident, the DON called a Code Yellow over the PA system and staff continued to look inside and outside for the resident. She reported that notifications were made to the resident's primary healthcare provider (PHP), Contact #1 and local police department (PD). She stated that the PD sent out an officer but that shortly after the officer arrived, RN #1 (Unit Manager) notified the DON that she (RN #1) had located the resident and had him in her supervision and was returning to the facility with him. She stated that the PHP was present at the facility upon his return so Registered Nurse (RN) #1 and the PHP conducted assessment including body audit and identified no injuries and the resident's vital signs were all within normal limits. She stated she had not observed any change in physical or psychosocial condition since the elopement. She stated that the weather was clear and hot on 8/07/25. She stated that during the missing resident procedure, CNA #1 had reported to her that she (CNA #1) had last seen Resident #1 in the facility at approximately 10:45 AM in the lobby and noted no agitation or unusual behavior. LPN #1 reported that upon return to the facility at 11:59 AM the resident was immediately placed on one-on-one supervision for forty-eight (48) hours, and a safe wandering device was applied to his left ankle and tested for proper functioning. She confirmed that on 8/07/25 the facility provided in-service training regarding resident rights, abuse and neglect prevention and reporting, resident safety and facility protocol/procedures for safe wandering, missing residents and elopements on 8/07/25. LPN #1 stated that Resident #1 had never displayed exit seeking behavior prior to 8/07/25. On 8/11/25 at 11:00 AM, an interview with the facility Receptionist revealed she recalled that on 8/07/25 at approximately 11:10 AM, Resident #1 had approached the sliding glass window of her office walking with his cane and expressed that he needed to go home and see his family. She stated that he had developed a habit of visiting the Reception Desk and requesting cash and that he was usually in his wheelchair. She said she asked him to take a seat as she was busy with cash disbursements, answering telephone calls and granting entrance and exit for staff, contractors and visitors. She stated that she had not observed him get up or leave the lobby. She confirmed that the facility provided in-service training regarding resident rights, abuse and neglect prevention and reporting, resident safety and facility protocol/procedures for safe wandering, missing residents and elopements on 8/07/25. On 8/11/25 at 11:10 AM, observation revealed all parking spaces in the well-maintained facility parking lot surfaced with asphalt. Observation revealed the route to the location where Resident #1 was located lead through a well populated residential area, over a bridge that was over a railroad track and led to a four-lane avenue with a speed limit of thirty-five (35) miles per hour, with repaving in progress and several traffic lights and pedestrian walkways; the location was equal distance between two traffic lights. The location where the resident was located by RN # 1, was a local business with a deep parking lot surfaced with well-maintained concrete, four occupied parking spaces and five unoccupied and one main entrance. The SA observed one hundred fifty (150) cars traveling the avenue in front of the location in a five-minute period.Review of weather history for the locale for 8/07/25 per world wide web national weather service revealed that on 8/07/25 at 11:53 AM the temperature was eighty-nine (89) degrees Fahrenheit with six (6) mile per hour winds and zero (0) precipitation and conditions were partly cloudy. On 8/11/25 at 1:10 PM, an interview revealed RN #1 she observed Resident #1 sitting in the lobby at around 11:10 AM time when she left going to the hospital to take a sample to the laboratory. She stated that returning to the facility she was driving west on the boulevard and observed the resident wearing a black knitted hat, short-sleeved button-up shirt, slide on shoes and carrying a cane walking through the parking lot of a local business in a parking space near the business' door. She stated she had parked her car near the front door, got out and assisted the resident without resistance into the backseat of her car. She described the weather as partly cloudy and hot. She reported that during the drive back to the facility the resident told her that he exited the facility through the front door and got a ride with a man in a truck to the location where she located him. RN #1 confirmed that the facility provided in-service training regarding resident rights, abuse and neglect prevention and reporting, resident safety and facility protocol/procedures for safe wandering, missing residents and elopements on 8/07/25.On 8/11/25 at 4:05 PM interview with CNA #1 revealed she said was working dayshift on D Hall on 8/07/25 and was assigned to the care of Resident #1. She said she had observed him sitting in a chair holding his cane in the front lobby across from the front office and front entrance at approximately 8:45 AM. She reported that at approximately 11:15 AM she did not observe the resident anymore until he returned from elopement.Record review of the Ad Hoc Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) dated 8/08/25 with attached sign-in sheet revealed confirmed that the facility conducted a QAPI committee meeting attended by the Medical Director, DON, Infection Preventionist (IP) and other key personnel/department directors. The agenda included the elopement of Resident #1 on 8/07/25 with a plan for the prevention with corrective actions included. Record review of the Education In-Service Attendance Record dated 8/07/25 with attached sign in sheet confirmed the facility provided in-service training for all staff regarding the facility elopement policy and procedure for missing residents and missing resident procedure experience. Record review of the Education In-Service Attendance Record dated 8/07/25 with attached sign in sheet confirmed the facility provided in-service training for all staff regarding visualization of the door until it is clear and closed and locked when granting admission/egress and abuse and neglect prevention and reporting. Record review of the admission Record for Resident #1revealed the facility admitted the resident on 9/27/24 and the resident had diagnoses of osteoarthritis, hypertension, vision loss, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 7/4/25 revealed Resident #1 had a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Section B indicated the facility had assessed the resident having severely impaired vision and Section GG indicated that he relied on a wheelchair for mobility. Corrective Action Plan:Brief Summary of Events:On 8/11/25 at 4:15 PM the State Agency (SA) notified the Executive Director (ED) of an immediate jeopardy Past Noncompliance related to F 689 Free of Accident Hazards /Supervision /Devices.Resident #1 at approximately 10:30 am left out the front entrance door and exited facility without staff knowledge. Resident #1 was located at 11:56 am approximately 2.0 miles from facility by Licensed Nurse #1 who returned the resident to the facility where he was assessed by nursing staff and his primary healthcare provided with no injuries noted and he was fitted with a safe wandering device.Immediate Action was initiated on 8/7/25: At approximately 11:05 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 and Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) #1 performed cursory search for resident #1. At 11:10 AM LPN #1 notified Director of Nursing (DON) that Resident #1 could not be located and the DON notified the Executive Director (ED) at approximately 11:15 AM. At 11:15 AM DON announced Code Yellow using the overhead public announcement (PA) system, for missing resident was called, and staff were dispersed to search inside and outside for Resident #1. At 11: 14 100% audit completed by Unit Manager #1 and Wound Care to ensure all residents were in the facility and accounted for. At 11:20 AM Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 and Resident's Physician were notified of elopement. At 11:26 AM Resident #1's Contact (daughter) was notified of elopement. At 11:46 AM the DON notified the local police department of the missing resident. At 11:48 AM neighboring police department was notified of Resident #1 home address for a well check. At 11:56 AM Registered Nurse (RN) 1 located Resident #1 approximately 2.5 miles from facility at 11:59 AM and transported Resident #1 back to the facility and arrived at 12:05 PM. At 12:05 PM NP #1 assessed Resident #1 with no injury noted. A body audit was completed. LPN #1 conducted a body audit with no noted injury. Resident #1 was interviewed by the DON and ED. Resident #1 stated he had exited the facility through the front door and an older man in a truck gave me a ride . The facility initiated one-on-one supervision for Resident #1 for forty-eight (48) hours. Social Services Director SSD) assessed Resident #1 for psychosocial distress and noted none and completed a new Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. At 12:30 PM Director of Nursing obtained an order for Resident #1 to have a secure care bracelet placed and LPN #1 applied secure care bracelet to Resident #1's Left ankle. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse updated the Care Plan for Resident #1. At 1:00 PM the Maintenance Director checked all the exit doors and ensured they were closed and locked. At 1:28 PM the ED notified the State Ombudsman. At 1:28 PM DON called the State Agency (SA) hotline and reported the elopement. At 2:30PM the ED placed signage on door that reminded visitors and staff to ensure door was completely closed when entering and leaving. A sign was also placed on the front desk by the visitors' sign in book. At 2:45 PM SSD was notified of need to send out letter to families to re-educate them on the importance of out-on-pass and sign-out procedures, not escorting residents outside of the facility without a staff member present, and encourage them to notify a staff member immediately, if a resident was attempting to leave the facility unattended by staff. At 4:19 PM DON completed the complaint e-form for the Mississippi State Attorney General. At 5:00 PM Nurse Managers completed a 100% audit of all residents for elopement risk, checked orders for secure care bracelets, made sure care plans were in place, and assessed residents to ensure those who are elopement risk had secure care bracelets in place and working by testing with handheld Secure Care Tester 135. SSD created information cards that were placed in the front office with a picture of the residents who are at risk for elopement and updated elopement binders placed at the nurse's stations and front desk. On 8/7/25 DON initiated Quality Observation, Monitoring of visitor's entry and exits to ensure Resident's do not leave out of the facility without staff knowledge. This will be done 2 times a day, during receptionist hours, 5 days a week, times 3 months per ADON/Designee. Quality Assurance Performance Committee (QAPI) met on 8/7/25 at 2:00 PM to review the events of Resident #1's exit from facility and determine a Root Cause. Attendees were Executive Director (ED), Social Services Director (SSD), Business Office Manager (BOM), Director of Nursing (DON), Activities Director (AD), Therapy Manager (TM), Maintenance Supervisor (MS), Licensed Nurse (LPN) #1 and Medical Records Clerk (MRC) and IP. The Root Cause was determined to be that Resident #1 exited door when a visitor was entering.Education:On 8/7/25 and 8/8/25, In-Service education was conducted by the Director of Clinical Services on Elopement Policy, Procedure for Missing Resident , and emphasis on ensuring complete closure of door when letting visitors in/out. This was a 100% mandatory education, and all employees will receive training upon hire and prior to taking assignment.The Facility alleges all corrective actions were completed on 8/8/2025 and the immediate jeopardy was removed on 8/9/2025, prior to the State Agency entrance on 8/11/2025.On 8/13/25 the SA validated through observation, interview and record review that the facility had completed all corrective actions on 8/8/2025 and the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 8/9/2025, prior to the State Agency entrance on 8/11/2025.
Jan 2025 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the dignity and respect of residents are upheld when feeding during mealtimes for one (1) of 26 sample resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the dignity and respect of residents are upheld when feeding during mealtimes for one (1) of 26 sample residents reviewed. Resident #3 Findings includes: An observation and interview on 1/06/25 at 1:30 PM, revealed Certified Nursing Assistant #1 (CNA) assisting Resident #3 with lunch. This observation revealed CNA #1 was standing up while feeding the resident. During an interview with CNA #1 stated that she did not know that she was not supposed to stand up when feeding residents. On 01/07/25 at 12:50 PM, Charge Nurse #1 stated during an interview that she was unaware that staff should sit down when feeding residents. She acknowledged that standing while assisting a resident with meals could raise dignity concerns. On 1/7/25, at 1:04 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) emphasized that CNAs should always sit at eye level when assisting residents with meals. She explained that sitting down prevents residents from feeling intimidated by staff who are standing over them and this approach enables eye contact which helps residents feel more comfortable. She noted that this practice is important as it maintains the residents' dignity. A record review of Resident #3's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 1/22/24 with diagnoses including Primary Generalized Osteo Arthritis and Cognitive Communication Deficit. A record review of Resident # 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 10/25/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Section GG revealed substantial maximum assistance with eating.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to wound care when a nurse cleaned a resident's pressure ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to wound care when a nurse cleaned a resident's pressure ulcer wound without patting it dry for one (1) of 43 resident care plans reviewed (Resident #64) Findings included: Record review of the facility's policy titled Plans of Care, revised 9/25/2017, revealed, The Individualized Person-Centered plan of care may include .Services are provided to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . Record review of Resident #64's comprehensive care plan revealed . Interventions/Task .Cleanse Stage 4 sacrum with wound cleanser and 4 x 4 gauze. Pat dry with 4 x 4 gauze . During an observation on 1/8/2025 at 12:03 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #2 did not pat the wound dry with gauze on the sacral region as described in Resident #64's care plan. On 1/8/2025 at 2:20 PM, during an interview, RN #2 admitted she did not pat the sacral region dry with gauze as per Resident #64's care plan. On 1/9/2025 at 12:00 PM, during an interview, RN #3 Minimum Data Set (MDS/Care Plan) nurse, stated that care plans are created to inform staff of residents' care needs and should be followed by all staff. She emphasized the importance of adhering to the care plan when providing care. Record review of Resident #64's admission Record revealed an admission date of 1/24/2024 with diagnoses including Pressure Ulcer of Right Heel, Stage 2 and Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral Region, Stage 4.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to securely safeguard hazardous chemicals in two unlocked janitor's closets for one (1) of four (4) days of surve...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to securely safeguard hazardous chemicals in two unlocked janitor's closets for one (1) of four (4) days of survey. Findings Include: Review of the facility ' s policy, Overview of Proper Chemical Use, revised 6/2016, revealed, In order to help prevent accidents from occurring you must follow the following guidelines: 6. If you leave chemicals in the janitor's closet the door must be locked . An observation on 01/06/25 at 10:30 AM, revealed the Janitor Closet on the 200 hall was unlocked and there was a full bottle of 3M Concentrated Glass Cleaner in the closet. An observation on 01/06/25 at 11:19 AM, revealed the Janitor Closet on the Intermediate Care (IC) Hall was unlocked and unattended and there were containers of 3M Concentrated Glass Cleaner and 3M Quat Disinfectant. On 01/07/25 at 3:19 PM, during an interview, Housekeeping Supervisor #2 confirmed that the Janitor Closet's were unlocked. She also confirmed that these rooms were used to store housekeeping carts containing chemicals and cleaning supplies, posing a potential safety hazard, especially for cognitively impaired residents. She disclosed the Janitor Closet doors were keyed. However, she did not possess keys to ensure they remained locked. She revealed that maintenance issues are usually given to maintenance verbally, but she had not notified maintenance of these doors being unlocked but would ask a nurse to notify them. An interview on 01/07/25 at 3:37 PM, with Maintenance Staff #1 revealed that he was unaware of the problems with janitor closets not locking until today. He confirmed that the janitor closets were used to store carts containing chemicals and cleaning supplies, emphasizing the potential safety concern this posed, particularly for residents that are cognitively impaired. An interview on 01/08/25 at 1:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that unlocked rooms storing cleaning supplies was a safety issue for residents particularly those that were identified as wanderers and should remain locked. An interview on 01/09/25 at 10:00 AM, the Administrator confirmed not properly securing the janitors closets that housed chemicals posed a potential hazard, especially for cognitively impaired residents. She continued by admitting that any maintenance issue should be clearly communicated and corrected. A record review of the Safety Data Sheet, dated 6/5/24, revealed Glass Cleaner Concentrate had a Hazard identification classification that indicated Serious Eye Damage/Irritation. Review of Handling and storage revealed Precautions for safe handling included Keep out of reach of children . A record review of the Safety Data Sheet, dated 10/9/18, revealed Quat Disinfectant Cleaner Concentrate ' had a Hazard identification classification that indicated Serious Eye Damage/Irritation and Skin Corrosion/Irritation and May cause chemical gastrointestinal burns. Review of Handling and storage revealed Precautions for safe handling included Keep out of reach of children .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0800 (Tag F0800)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff supported and respected a resident's right to make choices ab...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff supported and respected a resident's right to make choices about his or her meal preferences for one (1) of twenty-six (26) sampled residents. Resident #40. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy Menus revised 10/2022, revealed, .Procedures .2. Menus will be periodically presented for resident review, including the resident council, menu review meetings, or other review board as indicated by the center. The menu will identify the primary meal, the alternate meal, and any always offered food and beverage items . An observation on 1/6/25 at 10:52 AM, revealed a menu hanging in both dining areas that did not include alternate options. An interview on 01/7/25 at 11:13 AM, with Resident #40 indicated that alternate meals are never posted or available for selection. She stated that this situation upsets her because she feels they have no choice but to eat what is provided. Resident #40 explained that, as a diabetic, she may not particularly like the food being served, but she must eat something to avoid getting sick. An interview on 1/8/25 at 7:52 AM, with the Dietary Manager confirmed that the menus were outdated and did not contain alternate options at this time plus their system does not allow them to consider any alternates or individual preferences for the residents. She confirmed that residents should have current menus available, however, they do not provide alternate options for residents because the computerized system formulates their menu for the month based on the resident's allergies, likes and dislikes as identified on admission. She continued by admitting since it included so much information then there was no room for alternative or individual preferences. The Dietary District Manager confirmed that the residents should have the choice of an alternate meal by at least providing an always available menu. A record review of the admission Record reveals the facility admitted the Resident on 12/9/2016 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension. A record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/3/25 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide palatable, appropriately temperature-controlled foods for one (1) of (43) sampled residents....

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide palatable, appropriately temperature-controlled foods for one (1) of (43) sampled residents. Resident #40 Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Food Quality and Palatability Policy (HCSG Policy 006), revised February 2023, revealed, Policy Statement: Food will be prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. Food will be palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. Food and liquids are prepared and served in a manner, form, and texture to meet the residents' needs . During an interview on 1/7/2025 at 11:19 AM, Resident #40 complained the food served was usually cold. An observation and interview on 1/7/2025 at 12:09 PM, a meal tray was provided, and temperatures were evaluated by the Dietary Manager. The temperatures were as follows: white rice, 122°F (Fahrenheit); spinach, 122°F; and egg noodles with gravy, 109°F. A sampling of the meal tray revealed that the food was bland and not served at a palatable temperature. During an interview at this time the Dietary Manager agreed that these temperatures were unacceptable and noted that residents might not want to eat food at such temperatures. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #40 on 12/09/2016 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. A record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference date of 1/3/2025 revealed Resident #40 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possibility of the spread of infection as evidenced by improper hand hygiene practices and wound ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possibility of the spread of infection as evidenced by improper hand hygiene practices and wound care for three (3) of six (6) direct care observations. (Resident #3, Resident #64 and #66) Findings included: Record review of the facility's Handwashing Hand Hygiene policy, revised August 2019 revealed Policy Statement The facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infection. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 3. Hand hygiene products and supplies (sink, soap, towels, alcohol-based hand rub, etc.) shall be readily accessible and convenient for staff use . Record review of the facility's policy titled Dressing, Dry Clean, revised September 2013, revealed, . Steps in the Procedure .15. Cleanse the wound with the ordered cleaner. If using gauze, use a clean gauze for each cleaning stroke. Clean from the least contaminated to the most contaminated area (usually, from the center outward). 16. Use a dry gauze to pat dry . Resident #3 On 1/6/2025 at 11:00 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 and CNA #2 both entered the room, applied gloves, and began perineal care for Resident #3 without performing hand hygiene prior to applying clean gloves. CNA #1 pulled six (6) premoistened wipes from the packet and began cleaning the perineal area. When she ran out of wipes, she retrieved additional wipes from the packet twice with unclean gloves, touching the outside of the wipe packet during care. On 1/6/2025 at 11:29 AM, during an interview, CNA #1 confirmed that she forgot to wash her hands before starting care on Resident #3. She acknowledged that her actions could cause infection for the resident and that her failure to remove all needed wipes before starting care was an infection control issue, as she had touched the container with unclean gloves. On 1/6/2025 at 11:32 AM, during an interview, CNA #2 confirmed that she forgot to wash her hands before beginning perineal care for Resident #3. She confirmed her actions were an infection control issue. On 1/7/2025 at 12:52 PM, during an interview, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 stated the CNAs should have washed their hands before providing perineal care for Resident #3. She explained that CNA #1 should not have retrieved additional wipes with dirty gloves. RN #1 stated the CNAs caused cross-contamination and risked the spread of infection. On 1/7/2025 at 1:07 PM, during an interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the CNAs actions represented an infection control issue. She emphasized that staff must wash their hands prior to care, when transitioning from dirty to clean tasks, and after care. She added that failure to follow these practices could result in the spread of infections A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 on 1/22/2024 with diagnoses including Primary Generalized (Osteo) Arthritis and Cognitive Communication Deficit. A record review of Resident # 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 10/25/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Section GG indicated the resident was dependent for toileting hygiene. Resident #64 On 1/8/2025 at 12:03 PM, during an observation, Registered Nurse (RN) #2 was observed providing wound care to Resident #64. RN #2 washed her hands and applied gloves. She removed a soiled dressing from the resident's right heel, did not change her gloves and then cleaned the wound. While cleaning the wound she used normal saline and a gauze in a circular motion five times, alternating between dirty to clean and clean to dirty without changing the gauze. She removed a heavily soiled dressing from the sacral area and placed it in a biohazard bag. She then cleaned the sacral wound in the same circular motion six times with the same gauze, again alternating between dirty to clean and clean to dirty and did not pat dry after cleaning as indicated in the physicians order. On 1/8/2025 at 2:20 PM, during an interview, RN #2 confirmed that she should have performed hand hygiene and applied clean gloves after removing the soiled dressing. She also confirmed that she should not have cleaned the wound in a circular motion multiple times with the same gauze. She acknowledged that her actions could increase the risk of infection and delay wound healing. A record review of Resident #64's Order Listing Report revealed a physician order dated 12/7/2024, Wound care: Cleanse stage IV (4) pressure ulcer to sacrum with Dakins, pat dry with 4x4 gauze. Apply silver alginate to the wound bed, and cover with bordered gauze daily and prn (as needed.) Physician orders dated 12/13/2024 revealed Wound care to Stage II (2) ulcer to R (right) heel with NS (normal saline), apply medi honey to the wound bed, cover with an ABD (abdominal) pad, and wrap with Kerlix. Changed daily and PRN (as needed.) A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #64 on 1/24/2024 with diagnoses including Pressure Ulcer of the Right Heel, Stage 2 and Pressure Ulcer of the Sacral Region, Stage 4. A record review of the MDS with an ARD of 11/28/2024 revealed Resident #64 was severely impaired for cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident # 66 An observation and interview on 01/08/25 at 10:59 AM, with RN #2 performing wound care on Resident #66 revealed that she donned clean gloves without performing hand hygiene prior to removing and performing wound care to the resident's right knee abrasion. Upon finishing this wound, she rolled resident to his right side, removed a dressing with a moderate amount of foul-smelling purulent discharge on a sacral unstageable pressure ulcer with the same gloves used to dress and undress the first wound. She then walked to the resident's door, turned open the doorknob with the soiled gloves. An interview with RN #2 confirmed that she had not changed gloves or performed hand hygiene throughout the two procedures and that she opened the door with unclean gloves. She confirmed that infection could be spread from one wound to the other making it harder to heal and that wearing gloves to open the door could spread infection. An interview on 01/09/25 at 11:50 AM, with the DON confirmed that hand hygiene should be performed before and after completing wound care and before and after removing gloves. She confirmed that not doing this put the resident at risk of infection as well as increased difficulty in wound healing. She also confirmed that gloves should have been removed before touching a doorknob as that could increase the spread of infection throughout the facility. She further stated that it was her expectation that wound care would be performed according to guidelines for infection control and prevention. Record review of admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #66 on 02/23/23 with medical diagnoses that included Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region Unstageable. Record review of Resident #66's MDS with an ARD of 10/19/24 revealed Section M revealed the resident has 2 pressure ulcers.
Apr 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received Activites of Da...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received Activites of Daily Living (ADL) care to include oral hygiene for two (2) or six (6) sampled residents. Residents #3 and #6 Findings Include: Record review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Activities of Daily Living, dated 2/1/22, revealed, Policy: To encourage resident choice and participation in activities of daily living (ADL) and provide oversight, cuing and assistance as necessary. ADLs include bathing, dressing, grooming, hygiene, toileting and eating. Procedure: 1. CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) will review the resident [NAME] (facility software that includes individualized resident care) for information on individual care needs and preferences . Resident #3 In an interview on 4/15/24 at 12:43 PM, Resident #3 revealed that some of his grooming is done by staff, with the exception of assisting him in cleaning his teeth. He added that not having his teeth brushed irritates him but he has not brought it up. In an interview on 4/17/24 at 9:05 AM, Resident #3, once again emphasized his desire to brush his teeth every day. He explained that his toothbrush and toothpaste were in his nightstand drawer to his right, but he could not reach over to retrieve them. He added that he only needs someone to remove the items from his drawer and place them on the overbed table, as he can brush his own teeth, but staff have never offered to help him. Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Current diagnoses include Morbid (Severe) Obesity and Muscle Weakness. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/22/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Resident #6 During an interview on 4/15/24 at 2:11 PM, Resident #6 revealed he had not received oral care since arriving at the facility in September 2023. He stated staff members promised him a toothbrush and toothpaste last week, but it has yet to arrive. On 4/16/24 at 12:53 PM, Resident #6 stated in an interview that the CNAs had never approached him about oral care or offered to provide him a toothbrush or toothpaste to brush his own teeth. He denied ever declining this kind of care. He added that he wants to brush his teeth every day. A record review of the admission Record for Resident #6 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 9/28/23. Current diagnoses include Lack of Coordination, Stiffness of Joints, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Affecting Right Non-Dominant Side. A record review of the Quarterly MDS, for Resident #6, with ARD of 4/3/24 revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview with the Interim Director of Nurses (IDON) on 4/16/24 at 11:35 AM, she revealed that residents should have the choice of brushing their teeth daily. The Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) should do it or let the residents do it themselves. She points out that it is the role of the CNAs to help provide toothbrushes and other dental hygiene supplies. On 4/17/24, during an interview with CNA #1, she stated that she is occasionally assigned to care for Resident #6. She revealed that this resident has limited mobility and should be assisted with grooming tasks, such as brushing his teeth. She confirmed that the resident should be assisted in cleaning his teeth on a daily basis, as this is part of the grooming process for which CNAs are accountable. During a telephone interview on 4/18/24 at 10:33 AM, with the Administrator, she revealed she expects the CNAs to provide top to bottom care for residents as needed. The CNAs are to follow their task list when doing care. This means taking care of their hair, nails, and teeth, she wants it all done.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services in a manner to promote the healing and prevent complications of a pressure ulcer for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents with pressure ulcers. Resident #5 Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Skin and Wound, revised 1/24/2, revealed, Policy: To provide a system for identifying risk, and implementing resident centered interventions to promote skin health, prevention, and healing of pressure injuries . Process: Pressure Injury Prevention . 3. Nurse is to complete skin evaluation weekly and prior to transfer/discharge and document in the medical record . Skin Impairment Identification: 1. Document presence of skin impairment(s)/ new skin impairment(s) when observed and weekly until resolved. 2. Nurse to report changes in skin integrity to physician/physician extender, resident/resident representative and document in the medical record . On-going Evaluation 1. Evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and progress towards goals during the standard of care and the care plan meetings On 4/16/24 at 8:43 AM, an interview the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) stated they have not had a wound care nurse for two weeks, as the wound care nurse resigned. She revealed a Nurse Practitioner (NP) comes on Wednesday and measures the pressure and vascular wounds. The facility has all her assessments uploaded to the resident's computerized chart by the following Monday, so the staff can have access to them. The IDON stated she expects staff to do wound care and chart the care in the resident's chart. On 04/16/24 at 3:45 PM, an observation of wound care for Resident #5 revealed while performing wound care to the resident's sacral wound, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 did not apply the Dakins moist dressing to the wound bed prior to covering the wound with foam border gauze. Record review of the Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 4/17/24 revealed an order dated 2/9/24 Wound Care: Clean unstageable pressure wound to Sacrum, with full strength Dakins, Place Dakins moist gauze to wound bed, cover with foam brooder (boarder) gauze every day shift . On 4/16/24 at 4:28 PM, in an interview regarding the wound care, of Resident #5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 confirmed that she did not apply the Dakins moist gauge to the wound bed prior to covering the wound with the border gauze. The nurse stated the physician's orders for wound care are written to aid in the healing of the wound and should be followed. On 4/16/24 at 4:40 PM, in an interview with the IDON, she confirmed that LPN #1 should have followed physician orders, as the moist dressing aids in healing the wound. The IDON added that by not following the physician's orders, there is a possibility the wound could get worse. Review of the admission Record, revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Current diagnoses include Alzheimer's Disease, Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, and Atherosclerotic Heart Disease.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented, as evidenced by failure to provide oral care during Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for two (2) of six (6) sampled residents. Resident #3 and Resident #6 Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Plans of Care, revised 9/25/17, revealed, .Procedure .The Individualized Person-Centered plan of care may include but is not limited to the following .Services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as required by state and federal regulatory requirements . Individualized interventions that honor the resident's preferences and promote achievement of the resident's goals . Resident #3 Record review of the Care Plan for Resident #3 revealed (Proper name of Resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Activity Intolerance, Disease Process, Impaired balance .Interventions/Task .Personal Hygiene/Oral Care: totally dependent on staff for personal hygiene and oral care . During an interview on 4/15/24 with Resident #3 at 12:43 PM, he revealed that the staff assist him with some of his grooming, however, they have never assisted him in cleaning his teeth. On 4/17/24 at 9:05 AM, an interview revealed Resident #3 reiterated that he would like to brush his teeth daily. He stated staff never offers to help me. He adds that just last week, staff told him they would bring him a toothbrush and toothpaste but as of today it has not happened yet. Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Current diagnoses include Morbid (Severe) Obesity and Muscle Weakness. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/22/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Resident #6 Record review of the Care Plan for Resident #6 revealed (Proper Name of Resident #6) has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t dx (diagnosis) of Cerebrovascular Disease with Hemiplegia/Hemiparesis on right side .Interventions/Task .Oral care: Requires setup or clean-up assistance .Oral care routine . During an interview on 4/15/24 at 2:11 PM, Resident #6 revealed he had not received oral care since arriving at the facility in September 2023. He stated staff members promised him a toothbrush and toothpaste last week, but it has yet to arrive. Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Current diagnoses include Lack of Coordination, Stiffness of Joints, and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Affecting Right Non-Dominant Side. Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 4/3/24 revealed Resident #6 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 4/17/24 at 10:47 AM, in an interview with the Minimum Data Set (MDS), she stated that the aim of the care plan is to create a plan of care for the residents that is tailored to their specific needs. She suggests that everyone should adhere to the care plan, as it serves as a guide for how the residents' needs should be met. She stated if it is not followed, the residents' needs will not be met. During a post survey telephone interview on 4/18/24 at 10:33 AM, with the Administrator, she revealed she expects staff to follow the residents' care plans, as they serve as an individualized guide to the care of the residents.
Oct 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respec...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed. Residents #2 and #5. Findings include: Record review of the facility policy titled, Policies and Procedures, with Subject: Resident Rights, dated 11/30/14, revealed, It is the policy of The Company to .1. Ensure that residents' rights are known to staff .5. Ongoing training on resident rights will be given to staff members as required by state and/or federal regulations . Resident #2 Record review of the Facility Investigation dated 9/25/23, and an Incident Report for Resident #2, dated 9/24/23, revealed that Resident #2 had reported to the Director of Nurses (DON) that Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #3 was very mean and rude. Record review revealed an attached statement from Resident #2, recorded and signed by the Administrator, dated 9/26/23. In the statement, Resident #2 stated that a few days ago, which was determined to be Sunday, 9/24/23, a CNA was rude and mean to her while providing incontinent care and when asked not to be so rough, the resident stated the CNA did not respond verbally to the request, however, the resident revealed the CNA seemed to get rougher. On 10/18/23 at 10:45 AM, an interview with the Administrator revealed she was made aware of the allegation of mistreatment of Resident #2 by the Director of Nurses (DON) on 9/24/23, and a thorough investigation resulted in the end of the employment of CNA #3. The Administrator described Resident #2 as alert, oriented and well spoken. The Administrator stated that a review of the personnel folder for CNA #3 revealed previous concerns regarding treating residents rudely. On 10/19/23 at 4:20 PM, during a telephone interview with the Resident Representative (RR) for Resident #2, she revealed that the resident had been discharged from the facility due to change a in condition and was unavailable for interview because she was in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in a hospital in another state. The RR stated that she was the resident's daughter and that her mother had reported to her that CNA #3 was rude and mean to her during care on or around 9/24/23. The RR stated she was sure the resident was making an accurate allegation because she (CNA #3) was rude to me too. On 10/19/23 at 6:20 PM, an interview with the DON confirmed that Resident #2 had reported an allegation of disrespectful treatment which resulted in suspension of CNA #3 during a thorough investigation. The DON confirmed that the employment of CNA #3 was terminated as a direct result of the investigation. She stated that the facility conducted an Education In-Service for all facility staff on 9/26/23 titled Abuse, Neglect and Reporting, Incontinence Care Attitudes with included instructions and policy and regulation review. The DON stated that all residents should be treated with dignity and respect, and it was against facility policy and current standards of care to treat residents otherwise. On 10/20/23 at 4:55 PM, an interview with the Administrator revealed that she stated that the facility had provided in-service training for all staff on 9/26/23 regarding Resident Rights and treating residents with respect and dignity, following an incident with Resident #2. Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Acute Myocardial Infarction and Congestive Heart Failure. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/26/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score (BIMS) of 15 indicating Resident #2 was cognitively intact. Resident #5 On 10/18/23 at 12:30 PM, during an interview with Resident #5, the resident reported that last night, the resident was not sure of the time, he had slid out of his bed and that when his CNA (he did not know the CNA's name) had entered his room, she had yelled at him to get up. He reported that when the CNA realized that he was unable to get up without assistance, she summoned the nurse and they had assisted him back into bed and left him lying in bed, like a sack of potatoes. Resident #5 said he had to scoot himself around to get positioned in his bed. Resident #5 revealed that being yelled at and left that way in bed, left him feeling undignified. Resident #5 described his treatment by the CNA as mean and hateful. On 10/18/23 at 12:45 PM, in an interview with the Resident #5's roommate, an unsampled resident, he revealed that last night he woke up and saw Resident #5 on the floor. The resident stated he was unsure of the time, but realized it was still dark outside. Resident #5's roommate said the CNA who came into the room (he did not know her name) was rude and hollered at Resident #5 to get up. Resident #5's roommate stated that he told the CNA He can't get up, you got to help him. Resident #5's roommate commented that after they got Resident #5 back in bed, they just left him and confirmed that he saw Resident #5 moving himself around in the bed, trying to get straight. On 10/19/23 at 5:00 PM, an interview with the Administrator revealed she was not aware that Resident #5 had been found on the floor or that there was an allegation of disrespect or undignified treatment. She stated that the incident should have been reported to her. She stated all incidents involving falls are reviewed by the interdisciplinary team. On 10/19/23 at 6:05 PM, an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed she was the RN Supervisor for the building and usually worked 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM every Monday through Friday. She stated that all incidents, including falls, were supposed to be documented by nurses and are reviewed every morning by the interdisciplinary team during their morning meeting. She stated that there had been no reported fall or allegation of mistreatment regarding Resident #5 recorded by the nursing staff on the night of 10/17/23 or predawn hours of 10/18/23. RN #1 stated that when a resident is found on the floor, it is considered a fall, and an incident report should have been done. RN #1 stated that the roommate of Resident #5 had reported an incident of a fall involving Resident #5 and disrespectful treatment by staff during Resident #5's care, on 10/19/23 at approximately 6:00 PM. On 10/19/23 at 6:17 PM, a telephone interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed that Resident #5 had been located on the floor of his room next to his bed during the predawn hours of 10/18/23. LPN #1 stated that she had been summoned to Resident #5's room by CNA #4 and observed Resident #5 sitting on the floor next to his bed. She stated that she and the CNA #4 assisted the resident to transfer back into his bed. She stated that she could not remember if she documented any progress notes, filled out an incident report, or completed any documentation of the fall. She stated she did not notify the primary physician or the resident's RR, as the resident had stated that he slid out of bed and denied any injuries. She stated she had reported the fall to the oncoming shift during the shift change report. On 10/19/23 at 6:20 PM, She stated she was not aware that Resident #5 had voiced an allegation of being treated with lack of respect or that he had had a fall during the nighttime hours of 10/17/23 or predawn hours of 10/18/23. She said that Resident #5 had a condition which she observed as progressing recently, leaving him weaker and less able to assist with transfers. She stated that she thought it would have been disrespectful for staff to ask to instruct the resident to do things he was not physically able to do or to leave the resident without repositioning in bed, following a floor to bed transfer. On 10/19/23 at 6:30 PM, during a telephone interview with CNA #4, the CNA confirmed she had observed Resident #5 sitting on the floor next to his bed in his room during the predawn hours of 10/18/23 and summoned LPN #1 to the resident's room for assistance. CNA #4 stated that she kept telling him to use his legs, but he wouldn't, so she scooped his legs up onto the bed. CAN#4 commented that everything they asked him to do he, he wouldn't. CNA #4 confirmed that Resident #5 stated that he couldn't help. She confirmed that Resident #5 was not repositioned after he was assisted back into his bed. CNA #4 stated, I didn't know what was wrong with him, it was never explained to me. CNA #4 did state that care instructions for each resident was available to all CNAs on the kiosk (computer with software for documenting care). On 10/20/23 at 4:55 PM, an interview with the Administrator confirmed that at least three staff members had been aware of the incident which occurred in the predawn hours of 10/18/23, during which Resident #5 was observed on the floor of his room. She confirmed that yelling or hollering at a vulnerable resident on the floor to get up or use his legs and that leaving the resident without repositioning him in bed did not provide the resident with respectful or dignified care. She stated, We are going to just keep working on it. Record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Unsteadiness on feet, Other lack of coordination and Generalized anxiety disorder. Record review of the MDS with an ARD of 8/24/23 revealed a BIMS score of 14 indicating Resident #5 was cognitively intact.
Jun 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident whose clinical condition required catheterization received appropriate treatme...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident whose clinical condition required catheterization received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for one (1) out of eight (8) residents reviewed. Resident #7. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled Catheter Care, Urinary, with Revision Date 9/05/17, revealed, .Reattach catheter securement device . On 6/27/23 at 11:50 AM, and again at 12:08 PM, an observation revealed Resident #7 was resting in bed with her catheter tubing coiled and laying on the floor on the right side of the resident's bed. On 6/27/23 at 12:09 PM, an interview with the Administrator revealed the resident's nurse and the Director of Nurses (DON) were not available. The Administrator stated that catheter bags and tubing were not to touch or lie on the floor. On 6/27/23 at 12:11 PM, during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2, she confirmed that Resident #7's catheter tubing was laying on the floor. She stated that the facility had provided Infection Control In-Services which included care to be taken with catheters, catheter tubing, and catheter bags. She stated that In-Service training included instructions to keep catheter tubing and urine collection bags from touching the floor to prevent infection. On 6/27/23 at 4:10 PM, an observation revealed the Resident #7 was resting in bed with her urine collection bag resting on the floor on the right side of her bed. Resident #7 had her bedspread and sheet pulled back which revealed she did not have a leg strap in place to secure the catheter tubing. On 6/27/23 at 4:15 PM, during an interview with CNA #3, she confirmed that Resident #7's urine collection bag was laying on the floor. The CNA also confirmed that Resident #7 did not have a leg strap to secure her catheter tubing. She stated that the facility had provided Infection Control In-Services which included care to be taken with catheters, catheter tubing and catheter bags. She stated that In-Service training included instructions to keep catheter tubing and bags from touching the floor to prevent infection. On 6/27/23 at 4:30 PM, during an interview and observation of Resident #7 with the DON, she confirmed that Resident #7 did not have leg strap in place to secure the catheter tubing to the leg to prevent pulling of the foley catheter, which could cause irritation. The DON also confirmed that catheter bags and tubing should not lie on the floor, as it could be a source of infection. Record review of the Order Summary Report, dated 6/27/23, for Resident #7 revealed the resident had a physician order, dated 4/24/23, for a foley catheter. Record review of the admission Record, for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted by the facility on 4/24/23, and had diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). Record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/29/23, for Resident #7, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Further MDS review revealed that Resident #7 required assistance with all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), was not ambulatory and had an indwelling urinary catheter.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility procedure review the facility failed to ensure a clean and home...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility procedure review the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment for two (2) of (2) days of survey. Findings include: Record review of the facility provided contracted housekeeping procedure revealed the procedure with Revision Date 10/25/15 stated, SUBJECT-step Daily Washroom Cleaning .To show housekeeping employees the proper method to sanitize a washroom or bathroom in a long-term care facility .7-Steps Daily Washroom Cleaning 3. Dust Mop Floor .always dust mop the floor. 4. Clean and Sanitize Sink and Tub. The sink includes: the sink, fixtures, pipes under the sink .low pipes are always the most difficult areas to get- do not forget them. 6. Spot Clean Walls .Wipe walls-especially by trash containers, light switches, and door handles. Damp Mop Floor Use proper mop and germicide solution to disinfect the floor. Be sure to run mop along edges and never push dirt into corner. The procedure provided titled Daily Room Cleaning with Revision Date of 10/25/15 stated, PURPOSE: To teach Environmental Services employees the proper learning method to sanitize a patient room or any area in a healthcare facility. 5-Step Patient Room Cleaning Procedure .Spot Clean walls .Vertical surfaces are not completely wiped down daily - but must be spot-cleaned. Walls .light switches and door handles - will need special attention .Dust Mop The entire floor must be dust mopped - especially behind dressers .All corners and along all baseboards must be water pushes dust into corners, problems occur .Damp Mop Remember - The procedure is to damp mop- not wet mop (the most important area of a patient's room to disinfect is the floor. This is most air-borne bacteria will settle and so it needs to be sanitized daily. On 6/26/23 at 11:25 AM, observation and an interview with Resident #3, in her room revealed she stated that she was concerned about the condition of the bathroom attached to her room and reported foul smell emanating from the bathroom when the door was open. On 6/26/23 at 11:33 AM, observation and an interview with Resident #4, in her room revealed that she was concerned about the condition of the bathroom attached to her room and reported foul smell emanating from the bathroom when the door was open. She stated, There ' s toothpaste spattered on the door and the walls and it ' s gross. She reported that the bathroom appeared dirty to her, and she stated, there is mold on the wall behind the dresser and those two (2) wardrobes. The Maintenance Man showed it to me. She clarified that the Maintenance Man who showed her the wall was no longer employed at the facility. She stated that she had not reported the condition of the wall to anyone because, he showed it to me, so I knew that they knew about it, there was no reason for me to report it. Observation revealed that the bathroom attached to Resident #4 ' s attached bathroom had a foul, sour, stale odor and appeared dirty. The floor under the sink and behind the toilet and the baseboards around the room had a layer of gray/brown dry substance which wiped away easily with toilet paper and water. The corners of the room and the area beneath the door hinges were black. The floor was stained with green, pale rusty red, and yellow areas of linoleum that did not wipe away. There were seven (7) white spots on the inside door of the bathroom that ranged in size from a grain of rice to the size of a kidney bean which wiped away easily with toilet paper and water. The light switch cover was metal and had a rust-colored substance spread diffusely over the entire cover which wiped away with toilet paper and water. The plumbing fixtures beneath the sink and open to observation were covered with an abrasive rust-colored substance. On 6/26/23 at 12:15 PM, an interview with the Administrator in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed that upon observations she stated the bathroom needed to be cleaned. She said that the substance on the plumbing under the sink was rusty and said, it needs to be replaced. She confirmed that the substance on the inside of the door looks like toothpaste. She confirmed that the light switch cover needed to be cleaned and that it was considered a high touch surface and appeared to be covered with a light covering of rust. She confirmed that there she smelled a malodorous smell in the bathroom. She stated the baseboards were dusty and needed to be dusted and cleaned. She stated she did not believe the black substance on the floor in the four corners and below the hinges of the door was mold but stated that it needed a ridged scrapping tool to scrape it up. She stated that she would notify the housekeeping staff immediately to clean the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. She confirmed that the bathroom did not smell or appear clean. On 6/27/23 at 10:30 AM, the State Agency (SA) observed the ice machine located in the facility dining room next to the A/B Nurse ' s Station. The ice machine was clean and had the appearance of being well maintained. The ice machine was full of ice. There was a clean, plastic scoop in a clear plastic holder attached to the wall next to the ice machine. The floor behind the ice machine was wet with standing water. a puddle of water approximately 1218 (twelve by eighteen) inches that was approximately 1/32 (one thirty-second) of an inch deep behind the ice machine in the facility Dining Room. There was a thick coating of a dry, gray substance on the baseboard and water lines (tubing) behind the ice machine that easily wiped from the baseboards and tubing. There was a flat, black substance on the floor and baseboards behind the ice machine. The linoleum floor tiles beneath and around the ice machine were discolored with gray, brown, and black areas that did not wipe from the tiles. On 6/27/23 at 5:30 PM, observation and an interview with the Administrator in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed an area of flat black substance on the wall approximately eight (8) inches in length (top to bottom) which extended approximately two (2) inches wide on each wall in the corner between the bathroom wall and the wall on the right side of the room when facing the window from the door. The flat black substance was also visible on the wall behind the dresser. The substance was visible between the wardrobe and the dresser. The furniture was too heavy for SA to move to see how far the substance spread on the wall behind the furniture. Residents #3 and #4 had belongings and clothes stored in the wardrobes and the dresser. The Administrator was present in the room and stated that there was not staff at the building at the time capable of moving the furniture. The Administrator confirmed that she could see the black substance on the wall and that she was also unable to see behind the furniture to determine how far the substance spread along the wall. She said that she had not been made aware of the substance on the wall, and that no one had reported it to her. She stated that the furniture needed to be moved, the wall cleaned to remove the substance and the wall needed to be painted after removal/cleaning of the substance from the wall. She stated that she intended to investigate and get the maintenance department to check for any leak possible in the plumbing in the wall between the bathroom and the wall of room [ROOM NUMBER]. She stated that the former Maintenance Supervisor was no longer employed at the facility and that a new Maintenance Supervisor was to report for work at the facility in two weeks. She confirmed that the facility was currently relying on a Maintenance Assistant for maintenance needs at the facility. She stated that based on observation of the bathroom attached to room [ROOM NUMBER] the floor covering needed to be replaced due to the stains which were not removed with cleaning. She confirmed that she also thought the plumbing fixtures that she described as rusty needed to be replaced. She stated that while the floor appeared cleaner, the corners needed more attention and cleaning to remove the remaining black discoloration in the four (4) corners. On 6/27/23 at 1:04 PM, an interview with Resident #5 revealed she had concerns about the physical environment of the facility. She stated that she had observed mold or mildew in areas of the facility, including but not limited to walls and floors in various areas. She stated that she felt the entire facility needs to be cleaned. Resident #5 voiced specific concerns related to the ice machine. On 6/27/23 at 3:55 PM, observation and an interview with the Administrator revealed the Administrator confirmed the presence of a puddle of water approximately 1218 (twelve by eighteen) inches that was approximately 1/32 (one thirty-second) of an inch deep behind the ice machine in the facility Dining Room. The Administrator confirmed there was a thick coating of a dry, gray substance on the baseboard and water lines (tubing) behind the ice machine that easily wiped from the baseboards and tubing, and that there was a flat, black substance on the floor and baseboards behind the ice machine. The Administrator confirmed that the linoleum floor tiles beneath and around the ice machine were discolored with gray, brown, and black areas that did not wipe from the tiles. The Administrator stated that the puddle of water indicated a leak in the plumbing of the ice machine and needed to be repaired. She stated that the linoleum tiles needed to be replaced. She stated that the entire area behind the ice machine needed to be cleaned. The Administrator reported that the facility had removed the old ice machine and replaced it with a brand new ice machine. On 6/27/23 at 4:05 PM an interview with the District Housekeeping Supervisor revealed she confirmed that the bathroom attached to the room of Resident #3 and Resident #4 revealed that she confirmed that the bathroom had rusty light switch cover and rusty exposed plumbing fixtures. She confirmed that the floor of the bathroom had been dirty and the discolorations that remained after her attempt to clean them were stains and that the linoleum needed to be replaced. She confirmed that housekeeping needed to use the scrapper to get the black stuff out of the corners behind the toilet. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 5/24/23 for Resident #3 revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Record review of the Quarterly MDS with ARD 4/18/23 for Resident #4 revealed she had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. Record review of the admission MDS with ARD 4/12/23 for Resident #5 revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one (1) of eight (8) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident #6. Finding Include: Record review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living, with effective date 2/01/22, revealed, Policy: To encourage resident choice and participation in activities of daily living (ADL) and provide oversight, cueing and assistance as necessary. ADLs includes bathing, dressing, grooming, hygiene .Procedure: CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) will review the resident's [NAME] for information on individual needs and preferences . On 6/26/23 at 3:30 PM, an observation of Resident #6, revealed he was seated in a wheelchair next to the A/B Nurses Station wearing a green and white three button collared pullover shirt. The collar of his shirt was shredded. It had multiple strings hanging from the collar and the placket. Observation revealed Resident #6 had long, jagged, dirty fingernails which extended past the tips of his fingertips. On 6/27/23 at 10:40 AM, an observation of Resident #6 revealed he was seated in a wheelchair next to the A/B Nurses Station wearing a green and white three button collared pullover shirt. The collar of his shirt was shredded. It had multiple strings hanging from the collar and the placket. Observation revealed Resident #6 continued to have long, jagged, dirty fingernails which extended past the tips of his fingertips. On 6/27/23 at 11:05 AM, an observation and interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) of Resident #6, revealed that she was not aware that Resident #6 was wearing the same shirt that he had been wearing on 6/26/23. She was not sure if it had been laundered, but said she did not think there had been adequate time for a shirt worn the day before to be laundered and returned to the resident. She stated that the shirt looked raggedy, and that the resident should not have been dressed in the shirt if other shirts were available. The DON confirmed that the resident's fingernails were too long, dirty, and jagged. She stated that the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and nurses assigned to resident care were responsible for nail care and that the CNAs were responsible for dressing residents appropriately. On 6/27/23 at 11:15 AM, an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 assigned to the care of Resident #6 stated she had gotten resident out of bed on the morning of 6/27/23. The CNA confirmed that he had been wearing the damaged green and white shirt when she got him up. She confirmed that she had not changed his shirt. While discussing ADL care, the CNA made no other comments regarding care provided for Resident #6 on the morning of 6/26/23, only shrugging her shoulders. Record review of the admission Record' for Resident #6, revealed the resident was admitted by the facility on 7/09/18, with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Parkinson's Disease, Contracture of the Left and Right Hand, and Flaccid Hemiplegia Affecting Left Nondominant Side. Record review of the 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/11/23, for Resident #6 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score listed as 99 score indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. Further MDS review revealed Resident #6 was totally dependent on one-person physical assistance for dressing and personal hygiene.
May 2023 9 deficiencies 7 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop or implement a compre...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop or implement a comprehensive care plan for residents with a Supra-Pubic Catheter, diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Range-of-Motion (ROM) related to an Orthopedic Brace, Treatment related to a Vascular Implant, and Orthopedic, Wound and Vascular Appointments for five (5) of 24 care plans reviewed. Resident #31, Resident #34, Resident #75, Resident #87, and Resident #254. Serious harm occurred as a result of the facility's failure to develop or implement a Comprehensive Care Plan which resulted in decreased mobility for Resident #31, hospitalization for Resident #75, a wound infection for Resident #87, and sepsis for Resident #254. There was a likelihood of harm for Resident #34 due to a delay in changing a supra pubic catheter. The facility's failure to develop or implement care plan interventions placed these residents, and other residents who are at risk in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 11/21/22 when Resident #87 was referred to a vascular surgeon and the facility did not follow physician's orders. The Facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/5/23 at 12:23 PM and provided an IJ Template. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan on 5/7/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed and the IJ was removed on 5/8/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan on 5/9/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 5/8/23, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for 42 CFR 483.21 (b)(1)(i) Comprehensive Care Plan, F656 was lowered from a J to a scope and severity of a D, while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings Include: A review of the facility's Policy, Plans of Care revised 9/25/2017, revealed, Policy: An individualized person-centered plan of care will be established by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) with the resident and/or resident representative(s) to the extent practicable and updated in accordance with state and federal regulatory requirements .Procedure: Develop a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing .needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment .Develop and implement an individualized Person-Centered comprehensive plan of care by the interdisciplinary team that includes .The Individualized Person Centered plan of care may include but is not limited to the following .Services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental .well-being as required by state and federal regulatory requirements . Resident #75 Record review of the medical record revealed there was no Comprehensive Care Plan developed for Resident #75 that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical or nursing needs related to the resident's diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Congestive Heart Failure (CHF). Review of the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/29/23, revealed Resident #75 had Active Diagnoses including Heart Failure and Respiratory Failure and had additional active diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #75 on 9/12/22 and she had diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Morbid Obesity, and Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure. Resident # 31 Record review of the medical record revealed there was no Comprehensive Care Plan developed for Resident #31 to meet the resident's medical or nursing needs to address his left lower leg related to Range of Motion, his [NAME] brace and Othropedic appointments. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #31 on 1/31/23 with diagnoses including Displaced Fracture of Right Femur and Encounter for Orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Resident #34 Record review of the medical record revealed there was no Comprehensive Care Plan developed for Resident #34 that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical or nursing needs related to a newly placed suprapubic catheter. Record review of the Procedure Note, dated 3/24/23, revealed Resident #34 had a procedure for .placement of 16 french SPT (Suprapubic Tube) . Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #34 on 06/22/2020 with a diagnosis of Spina Bifida. Resident #87 Record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan with a Focus of The resident has a surgical wound of the left thigh R/t (related to) infected graft wound revealed Resident #87 had an Intervention/Tasks of Administer treatments as ordered . Record review of the Order Summary Report dated 5/3/23, revealed Resident #87 had a Physician's Order, dated 11/21/22, for refer to (Proper Name of Physician) vascular surgeon at (Proper Name of Medical Clinic), a Physician's Order, dated 3/17/23, for Get appointment with physician at (Proper Name of Medical Clinic) .ASAP (as soon as possible) .related to Unspecified Open Wound, Left Thigh ., and a Physician's Order, dated 4/11/23, for Get appointment with (Proper Name of Physician) vascular surgeon .as soon as possible to have artificial implant removed from Left Groin/Thigh . A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #87 on 07/06/2022, and he had diagnoses including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Depression. Resident #254 Record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan with a Focus of The resident has a (stage 4) pressure injury (sacrum) r/t disease process . revealed Resident #254 had Intervention/Tasks of Administer treatments as ordered . Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident #254 revealed a Nursing Progress Note dated 4/14/23 at 13:53 (1:53 PM) for unable to take resident to wound care apt (appointment) today will contact family and wound care to reschedule. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident 2354 on 4/14/22 with diagnoses including End Stage Heart Failure and Type 2 DM. During a phone interview on 05/05/23 at 02:50 PM, with RN, #2, who is the MDS/Care Plan nurse, she stated that she no longer worked for the facility as of 5/4/23. She explained there had always been three (3) nurses in the MDS/Care Plan office, but since the end of last year (2022), she had been in the office alone and had to complete all the care plans and the MDS assessments for the residents. RN #2 said that she was out in December and had not been able catch up with all the care plans. RN #2 said that at the end of March 2023, another nurse was hired for the MDS/Care Plan office, but both have had to work the floor and cart and have not been able to get caught up on all the care plans. RN #2 explained the purpose of the care plans was to provide a plan of care for the residents and she expected the staff to follow the care plans as indicated to provide residents with quality care and to meet their needs. RN #2 confirmed all residents should have individualized care plans to meet their needs. During an interview on 05/05/23 at 03:30 PM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), she said that due to staffing issues, both the MDS/Care Plan nurses have had to work the floor and cart lately. She explained she expected all staff members to develop and follow the care plans to meet the needs of all residents. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan which included: Immediate Action started on 05/05/2023 at 12:23 PM: Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. On 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met to ensure the residents receive needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to include needed medical services as physician ordered, to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, to prevent residents from experiencing avoidable loss of ROM, to ensure facility administration is administered in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents receiving physician ordered services, and to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained. A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and reviewed policies and procedures for changes. RCA revealed the policy was not followed and one of two vans was out of commission. RCA revealed former ED only rented a van for two weeks during the timeframe one van was out of commission and did not continue to rent a van nor secure other means of transportation even though Company approval was given. Attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). A review of policy and procedures were: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. On 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. On 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. On 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. Resident #254 is no longer in the facility as of 04/19/2023 related to transferred to the hospital. On 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. On 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. On 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. On 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM. The facility alleges all corrective actions were completed to remove the immediacy on May 7, 2023, and the Immediate Jeopardy was removed May 8, 2023. The State Agency (SA) validated the facility's Corrective Actions: 1.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. 2.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. 3.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. 4.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met and covered needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, Comprehensive Care Plans, residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, facility administration and review of an effective QAPI program is maintained. The SA determined a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and policies and procedures were reviewed for changes. The SA determined attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). The SA determined a review of policy and procedures were performed for: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. 5.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 6.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. 7.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 8.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 9.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:20 PM, the RDCS initiated education with the RN MDS Nurses to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to prevent further resident complications for residents' treatment related to a vascular implant and orthopedic and vascular appointments. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 10.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:30 PM, the DON initiated education to licensed nurses to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 11.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. 12. ) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. 13. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews/record review on 05/07/2023 at 8:00 AM, RDCS 1, RDCS 2, RDCS 3 (Regional Director of Clinical Services 3), and RN Treatment Nurse completed assessments on current residents to ensure medical stability and not requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. The SA validated no residents at risk were identified. 14. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. 15. The State Agency (SA) validated through observation/interviews and record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. 16. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. 17. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 24 sampled residents received outside medical services as ordered to prevent complications and maintain the highest prac...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 24 sampled residents received outside medical services as ordered to prevent complications and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and/or psychosocial wellbeing. Residents #75 and #87. The facility's failure to provide required outside medical services led to the hospitalization of Resident #75 due to Congested Heart Failure (CHF) and Pneumonia and was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and wound infection for Resident #87 caused serious injury, serious harm, and serious impairment to Resident #75 and Resident #87 and placed other residents in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 11/21/22 when Resident #87 missed scheduled appointments with the vascular surgeon and developed two separate infections awaiting rescheduled appointments. The Facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/5/23 at 12:23 PM and provided an IJ Template. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan on 5/7/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed and the IJ was removed on 5/8/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan on 5/9/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 5/8/23 prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for 42 CFR 483.25 Quality of Care, F684 was lowered from a J to a scope and severity of a D, while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: Resident #75 On 05/01/23 at 03:20 PM, during an interview with Resident #75 she complained the facility has not made a follow-up appointment for the Cardiology and Pulmonary doctors and she ended up being in the hospital. Resident #75 voiced she was concerned over missing the doctor appointments because she had to be sent the hospital because she had difficulty breathing and was diagnosed with Pneumonia. She did not understand why she could not go to her doctors' appointments. On 5/3/23 at 01:00 PM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, she reported Resident #75 did not go to see her Cardiologist and Pulmonologist because the facility van was not accessible to Resident #75 and the facility must pay in advance for non-medical transfers. LPN #2 stated for the same reason, Resident #75 was not sent to the hospital for a chest (CXR) x-ray. LPN #2 reported this information was provided to her by the previous Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator. On 5/3/23 at 3:30 PM, during an interview with the Nurse Practitioner (NP), the NP explained she wrote an order for Resident #75 to follow up with her Cardiologist and Pulmonologist in January 2023, which was not done. She had ordered a portable chest x-ray in January for the resident which was not done because her weight exceeded 300 pounds, so she ordered to schedule a chest x-ray at the hospital. The chest x-ray still was not completed. She explained she talked to the Administrator and previous DON about Resident #75 not getting scheduled for appointments. The Administrator told her Resident #75 was unable to fit in the company van and he would have to pay in advance to have residents transported for non-emergencies. The NP reported if the facility would have sent Resident #75 to the follow-up appointments with the Cardiologist and Pulmonologist and scheduled the chest x-ray that Resident #75 would not have been admitted to the hospital with diagnoses of Congested Heart Failure (CHF) and Pneumonia and admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). On 5/3/23 at 04:00 PM, during an interview with the current DON, she stated she was not the DON at the time the NP placed the order for Resident #75 to follow-up with Cardiologist and Pulmonologist or to get a chest x-ray at the hospital. She stated has been aware of the issue with transportation for residents and appointments because the facility must pay in advance for non-emergency visits. She confirmed that Resident #75 was not sent to her Cardiologist and Pulmonologist and was not sent to the hospital for a chest x-ray due to transportation problems with the facility. A record review of Resident #75's Order Summary Report with active orders as of 05/03/2023, revealed an order dated 01/03/2023, Schedule an appointment in (Proper name of city) with this resident's Cardiologist and Pulmonologist as she is c/o (complains) of Increased heart palpitations and Shortness of breath. She states she has not been seen in over a year. Review of Resident #75's Progress Notes *NEW* revealed a NP progress note dated 01/24/2023 revealed . The resident reports she is experiencing occasional heart palpations, states she just feels like her heart is running away from her and she feel short of breath when this happens . Will discuss the status of her orders to schedule a F/U (follow-up) appointment with her cardiologist and pulmonologist . POC (Plan of Care) 3. CXR (chest x-ray) c/o (complain) SOB (shortness of breath). Review of Resident #75's Progress Notes *NEW* nursing progress notes dated 1/26/23 by LPN #2 revealed . portable CXR, unable to perform r/t (related to) res (resident) weight exceeding 300 lbs (pounds) per policy. Resident aware, DON notified, NP notified then instructed for CXR to be scheduled and resident to be transferred to hospital to be obtained . A record review of Resident #75's Progress Notes *NEW* NP progress notes dated 03/01/2023 revealed . This resident request a couple of days of extra Lasix for increased fluid. She states she is having more shortness of breath even with her 02 (oxygen) NC (nasal cannula) . POC: . 1. Increase PM (evening) dose of Lasix to 80 milligrams (mgs) po (by mouth) Q (every) evening x 5 days . Review of Resident #75's Progress Notes *NEW* nursing progress notes dated 03/15/2023 at 01:38 PM revealed . Resident complained SOB with difficulty breathing . NP present in facility, made aware. N.O. (new order) to send resident to Proper Name for further evaluation . Review of #75's Progress Notes *NEW* nursing progress notes written by LPN #2, dated 03/15/2023 at 06:14 PM revealed . Placed call to Proper Name for follow up, spoke with charge nurse. admitted . with diagnoses Congested Heart Failure (CHF), pulmonary disease . A record review of the History and Physical Note from the local hospital, dated 3/15/23, for Resident #75, revealed, CT (Computed Tomography) of the chest showed evidence of pneumonitis and possible atypical pneumonia. She was admitted . A record review of Resident #75's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #75 on 09/12/2022, per the admission Record with the diagnosis that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Morbid Obesity, and Respiratory Failure. A record review of Resident #75's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/29/23 revealed Resident #79 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 that indicated Resident #75 has moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #87 On 05/03/23 at 03:30 PM, during an interview with the NP, she explained Resident #87 has an artificial implant that was place by the vascular surgeon prior to admission for poor circulation and Resident #87 has been constantly complaining of pain and has had recurrent infections in that area because the implant needs to be removed. She wrote orders last year for the facility to make an appointment to follow up with the vascular surgeon, but the facility kept changing Resident #87's appointments. Resident #87 has not seen the vascular surgeon as of today. She asked the DON why Resident #87 has not seen the surgeon and was told because the facility is down a van and dialysis residents have top priority. Record review of the Microbiology report for Wound Cultures collected 3/21/23 and reported 3/23/23 for Resident #87 revealed a specimen from the Thigh was collected and resulted in .Moderate Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) . Record review of the Microbiology report for Wound Cultures collected 4/11/23 and reported 4/15/23 for Resident #87 revealed a specimen was collected from the Thigh and resulted in Light .(MRSA) . On 05/03/23 at 04:00 PM, during an interview with Resident #87, he confirmed he has been having recurrent infections in his thigh and needed to have the implant removed. Resident #87 reported the NP said she would have the facility to set up appointment, but don't remember what month it was. He did remember it was last year. His appointments kept getting changed because the facility vans were not working. He stated he had an appointment scheduled for 05/04/2023 but he was afraid the appointment may be missed because the facility still only has one van. A record review of Resident #87's Order Summary Report dated 05/03/2023 revealed an order to refer to Vascular surgeon on 11/21/2022, 03/17/23 and 04/11/23. A record review of Resident #87's Progress Notes *NEW* dated 4/11/23 at 05:00 PM Physician Progress note revealed . This resident states he is having pain in his left groin/thigh. He just completed antibiotic therapy for MRSA to his left groin/thigh wound where he has an artificial implant placed by the vascular surgeon . for his PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease) in the past. This implant has given him trouble since insertion, and he was trying to get it removed when he was first admitted to the facility last year . POC: . Get appointment with Vascular surgeon at (Proper Name) as soon as possible to have artificial implant removed from left groin/thigh . On 05/04/23 at 08:07 AM, during an interview with the Medical Director (MD) he explained he attended the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement/Quality Assurance (QAPI/QA) meeting quarterly and he was told at the last quarterly meeting that the facility had rescheduled some resident appointments because the facility was having problems with transportation, but the facility had addressed the problem and it was resolved. He did not know Resident #87 had not seen the surgeon and remembered telling staff in the meeting that residents need to follow up immediately with their surgeons. He stated that he told staff the transportation issue needed to be taken care of immediately. He thought the transportation problems were resolved. On 05/04/23 at 09:24 AM, during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)#1, she explained she was the transportation driver. The facility had communication problems with appointments because the different nurses, residents, and DON were making appointments and the appointments were clashing with each other which caused confusion. Residents missed appointments because several appointments were scheduled at the same time. On 05/04/23 at 10:48 AM, during an interview with the current DON, she confirmed Resident #87's appointments with the vascular surgeon have been changed several times because the facility had problems with both vans. One van was damaged in an accident and the other van was in the shop being repaired. She said she had to try to rearrange several appointments but Resident #87's appointment got lost in the cracks. She stated that when she realized Resident #87's appointment was missed, she called the surgeon's office and asked the nurse to set up an appointment, however, this was several months later. The DON confirmed Resident #87 has had infections twice since he had the implant placed. On 05/04/23 at 11:58 AM, during an interview with the Administrator, he confirmed the facility failed to send Resident #87 out to follow up with his vascular surgeon. One van was disabled in February 2023 and the other van kept breaking down and was placed in the shop several times. He e-mailed his corporate office letting them know he did not have transportation for the residents to go out to their appointments. He rented a van to help with the dialysis appointments and some local appointments. He stated that the corporate office said they were working with the insurance company trying to get another van and the disabled van has not been replaced. A record review of Resident #87's admission Record revealed the facility admitted resident on 07/06/2022 with the diagnoses of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and Depression. A record review of Resident #87's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/05/2023 revealed Resident #87 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated Resident #87 was cognitively intact. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan which included: Immediate Action started on 05/05/2023 at 12:23 PM: * Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. * Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. * Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. * On 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met to ensure the residents receive needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to include needed medical services as physician ordered, to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, to prevent residents from experiencing avoidable loss of ROM, to ensure facility administration is administered in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents receiving physician ordered services, and to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained. A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and reviewed policies and procedures for changes. RCA revealed the policy was not followed and one of two vans was out of commission. RCA revealed former ED only rented a van for two weeks during the timeframe one van was out of commission and did not continue to rent a van nor secure other means of transportation even though Company approval was given. Attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). A review of policy and procedures were: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. * On 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. * On 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. * On 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. * On 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. * On 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. * On 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. Resident #254 is no longer in the facility as of 04/19/2023 related to transferred to the hospital. * On 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. * On 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. * On 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. * On 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM. * The facility alleges all corrective actions were completed to remove the immediacy on May 7, 2023, and the Immediate Jeopardy was removed May 8, 2023. The State Agency (SA) validated the facility's Corrective Actions: 1.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. 2.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. 3.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. 4.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met and covered needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, Comprehensive Care Plans, residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, facility administration and review of an effective QAPI program is maintained. The SA determined a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and policies and procedures were reviewed for changes. The SA determined attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). The SA determined a review of policy and procedures were performed for: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. 5.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 6.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. 7.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 8.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 9.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:20 PM, the RDCS initiated education with the RN MDS Nurses to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to prevent further resident complications for residents' treatment related to a vascular implant and orthopedic and vascular appointments. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 10.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:30 PM, the DON initiated education to licensed nurses to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 11.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. 12. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. 13. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews/record review on 05/07/2023 at 8:00 AM, RDCS 1, RDCS 2, RDCS 3 (Regional Director of Clinical Services 3), and RN Treatment Nurse completed assessments on current residents to ensure medical stability and not requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. The SA validated no residents at risk were identified. 14. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. 15. The State Agency (SA) validated through observation/interviews and record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. 16. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. 17. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide medical services to p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide medical services to prevent an avoidable reduction in range-of-motion (ROM) and loss of mobility for one (1) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for ROM. Resident #31. The facility's failure to provide services to prevent the avoidable loss of ROM for Resident #31 resulted in serious injury, serious harm, and serious impairment and placed other residents in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 2/14/23 when Resident #31 missed the first post operative appointment with an orthopedic surgeon. The Facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/5/23 at 12:23 PM and provided an IJ Template. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan on 5/7/23, in which the facility alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed and the IJ was removed on 5/8/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan on 5/9/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 5/8/23 prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for 42 CFR 483.25 (c)(1) Mobility, F688 was lowered from a J to a scope and severity of a D, while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings Include: A record review of facility policy Contractures Prevention with a revision date of 8/22/2017, revealed Policy: To prevent contracture of extremities for those residents who no longer have full use of their extremities .Each resident must be evaluated for need of contracture prevention procedures . as needed . residents may have braces or splints to prevent or help release contractures . be sure to follow the physician's order . On 05/01/23 at 03:21 PM, in an interview, Resident #31 stated staff will not get him up out of the bed. He stated he has missed two physician appointments due to the facility's van not working. On 5/3/23 at 3:30 PM, in an interview with the Nurse Practitioner (NP) revealed Resident #31 had orders to follow up (F/U) with the Orthopedic surgeon in February. The NP explained the order was for follow-up before the resident could be seen by therapy. The resident was ordered non-weight bearing and could not get out of the bed until the Orthopedic surgeon follow-up appointment. The NP said the resident still had not seen the orthopedic surgeon as of today. The NP said the resident's left foot has turned to the side now. The NP said she has talked to the Administrator and the Director of Nurses (DON) several times explaining the resident's need for a follow up appointment. On 05/04/23 at 09:42 AM, an observation revealed Resident #31 had a right below the knee amputation (BKA). The resident's left leg was noted to be in a brace that was not secured to his leg and the resident's left foot was turned outward. Interview on 05/04/23 at 09:45 AM, revealed Resident #31 stated he wanted to get out of his room. The resident said he has not left his room since he was admitted on [DATE]. The resident said he wanted to go outside and enjoy the fresh air, and it is miserable staying in this room all the time watching television. The resident said he cannot go to therapy until he sees the surgeon. The resident also said he has lost one leg and he feel like he might lose another leg because it has been so long since he had a follow-up with the surgeon. Record review of the Order Recap Report revealed Resident #31 had a Physician's Order, dated 2/1/23 and discontinued on 3/8/23 for, Follow up appointment: Feb (February) 14, 2023 10:15 A . Post-Op visit . and a Physician's Order, dated 3/8/23 for, Schedule F/U appointment with Orthopedics (ortho) . Record review of the facility's Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note dated 2/14/23 at 15:44 (3:44 PM) for, .Wound care nurse requests evaluation of multiple areas with sutures, as he had a F/U appointment today with Orthopedics but did not go, will review the reason why with DON. Did document the following appointments on my last visit to be sure he did not miss them. Will again review all appointments with DON . revealed Resident #31 missed follow up appointment. NP will follow up with DON. Record review of the facility's Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note, dated 2/15/23 at 10:44 AM for, .Reviewed appointments with DON and information for each appointment documented in my note. Yesterday's appointment was rescheduled as the facility's transportation department already had a full calendar prior to his admission . Record review of the facility's Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note, dated 2/28/23 at 12:35 PM, for, NP/F/U stitch removal .Reassessed this resident's multiple surgical areas to see how they are doing after removing sutures last week to his Left leg and the Right AKA (Above Knee Amputation) stump .some sutures remain. On staff attempt to remove sutures some were too embedded to be able to remove. The staff nurse asked me if I could look at them and attempt to remove the remaining sutures. Removed remaining sutures from Right stump and Left thigh area .continues to wear a [NAME] brace to LLE (Left Lower Extremity) and remains NWB (non-weight bearing) LLE and s/p (status post) RLE (Right Lower Extremity) AKA . Record review of the Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note, dated 3/8/23 at 11:44 AM, for, .This resident asked if he could start receiving PT (Physical Therapy). I discussed this with the PT department, they are waiting for Weight bearing status update as he is NWB per his discharge paperwork .He had a F/U appointment scheduled for Feb. 14, 2023 that was missed and rescheduled for [DATE] according to the DON but when they called to confirm the 27th appointment prior to transport the DON states she was told they did not have any F/U appointment on the books with Ortho. (orthopedic) for this patient at all and no other appointment has been made as of today as I spoke with the scheduling department myself .this AM and she confirmed no F/U Ortho. appointment for this patient at this time. I discussed this with the DON, she is to schedule that F/U, after that visit we can get weight bearing status and be able to move forward with his PT/OT (Occupational Therapy) according to Ortho's recommendations . Record review of the Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Nursing Progress Note dated 3/8/23 at 11:44 AM, for, Called (Proper Name of Orthopedic Facility) .in reference to f/u appt for resident .schedule is filled at the time and he does not have any openings . Record review of the Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note, dated 4/25/23 at 13:25 (1:25 PM) for, .He is asking when he remove his left leg brace. I explained to him he has to see Ortho and get the order to remove this brace from them. He voiced concern that he has missed several appointments to go back and see Ortho because of transportation, as he is being told. I spoke with DON and Administrator concerning this resident and his return appointments, they both state they are working on it as it has been a transportation issue. I expressed the importance of getting him back to the Orthopedic ASAP (As soon as possible) for F/U of his surgeries and hospital stay prior to admission on [DATE]. They both expressed understanding . Review of the medical record revealed there was no documentation indicating that Resident #31 was seen by the Orthopedic Surgeon as ordered. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #31 on 1/31/23 with diagnoses including Displaced Fracture of Right Femur and Encounter for Orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. Interview on 05/04/23 at 10:35 AM, with Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA) said the resident could not be seen by therapy until he was seen by his orthopedic surgeon. The therapist said they will need an order for the resident weight bearing status. On 05/05/23 at 9:50 AM, in an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 stated she was aware of the van breaking down several times in February and March and Resident #31 missing physician appointments. She stated he cannot get out of bed until he sees his orthopedic doctor. On 05/08/23 at 11:53 AM, in an interview with the current Director of Nursing (DON) revealed Resident #31 cannot put weight on his leg until after he sees the Orthopedic physician for a follow up appointment. She stated he has been in bed since admission on [DATE]. She confirmed the resident had missed appointments and stated the appointments he missed have been rescheduled. The DON stated the resident must go to his orthopedic appointment by non-emergency ambulance. She stated she informed the Administrator of the importance of the resident keeping his follow up appointment. A record review of Resident #31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)with an Assessment Reference Date of 2/7/23 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15, which indicates Resident #31 is cognitively intact. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan which included: Immediate Action started on 05/05/2023 at 12:23 PM: * Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. * Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. * Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. * On 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met to ensure the residents receive needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to include needed medical services as physician ordered, to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, to prevent residents from experiencing avoidable loss of ROM, to ensure facility administration is administered in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents receiving physician ordered services, and to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained. A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and reviewed policies and procedures for changes. RCA revealed the policy was not followed and one of two vans was out of commission. RCA revealed former ED only rented a van for two weeks during the timeframe one van was out of commission and did not continue to rent a van nor secure other means of transportation even though Company approval was given.Attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). A review of policy and procedures were: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. * On 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. * On 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. * On 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. * On 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. * On 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. * On 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. Resident #254 is no longer in the facility as of 04/19/2023 related to transferred to the hospital. * On 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. * On 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. * On 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. * On 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM. * The facility alleges all corrective actions were completed to remove the immediacy on May 7, 2023, and the Immediate Jeopardy was removed May 8, 2023. The State Agency (SA) validated the facility's Corrective Actions: 1.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. 2.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. 3.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. 4.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met and covered needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, Comprehensive Care Plans, residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, facility administration and review of an effective QAPI program is maintained. The SA determined a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and policies and procedures were reviewed for changes. The SA determined attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). The SA determined a review of policy and procedures were performed for: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. 5.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 6.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. 7.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 8.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 9.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:20 PM, the RDCS initiated education with the RN MDS Nurses to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to prevent further resident complications for residents' treatment related to a vascular implant and orthopedic and vascular appointments. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 10.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:30 PM, the DON initiated education to licensed nurses to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 11.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. 12. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. 13. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews/record review on 05/07/2023 at 8:00 AM, RDCS 1, RDCS 2, RDCS 3 (Regional Director of Clinical Services 3), and RN Treatment Nurse completed assessments on current residents to ensure medical stability and not requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. The SA validated no residents at risk were identified. 14. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. 15. The State Agency (SA) validated through observation/interviews and record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. 16. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. 17. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a functioning call lig...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a functioning call light system was available for residents' bathrooms for 18 residents out of 107 residents that reside in the facility. (Residents #4, #5, #12, #21, #32, #37, #38, #44, #46, #49, #57, #60 #65, #69, #71, #81, #87, and #96) The facility's failure to ensure a functioning call light system was available for residents' bathrooms for 18 residents residing in the facility placed these residents, and other residents, in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 4/16/23 when a maintenance work order was completed for call light issues but was not acted upon. The facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/2/23 at 5:38 PM and provided an IJ Template. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan on 5/2/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed and the IJ was removed on 5/3/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan on 5/9/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 5/3/23 prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for 42 CFR 483.90 (g)(2) Resident Call System, F919 was lowered from a J to a scope and severity of a D, while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Call Bell System-Inoperable with revision date 08/22/2017, revealed, Policy: Resident must have, at all times, a system to notify staff when assistance is needed. The call bell system is to be inspected on a regular basis by Maintenance. If the Call Bell System is inoperable, in one room, one hall, or the entire unit, the following procedure must be followed: Procedure: Maintenance, the Executive Director, and the Director of Clinical Services must be notified immediately if any call bell or the system is inoperable . On 05/01/23 at 12:01 PM, during an interview with Resident #49, she reported the bathroom call light does not work in her current room, nor did it work in her previous bathroom when she was in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The resident explained when she tried to pull the call light cords in the bathrooms, nothing happened. Resident #49 revealed that she had reported the non-working call lights to a staff member but does not remember the name. On 05/02/23 at 08:05 AM, observed the metal frame and switch button of the bathroom call light located in the bathroom between 204 and 206 to be covered with a heavy corrosive material. It was very difficult to pull the cord but when the cord was pulled, the light did not work, and the call light switch could not be turned back to off position by pushing the button down. On 05/02/23 at 09:00 AM, during an interview with Resident #46, she reported she has never attempted to use the call light in her bathroom but had been told by staff members that the call light did not work. When the call light was tested, the light did not work. On 05/02/23 at 09:15 AM, during an interview with Resident #37, she reported thankfully she has never had to use her bathroom call light, because it does not work. On 05/02/23 at 09:25 AM, during an interview with Resident #5, she revealed she had never tried to use her bathroom call light, because a night shift employee had told her the light did not work. On 05/02/23 at 09:35 AM, during an observation of the call light button and metal base in the bathroom located between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], revealed a heavy corrosive substance. When the call light was pulled, the call light did not work. On 05/02/23 at 10:13 AM, during an observation of the call lights in the bathrooms located between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], 204 and 206, 209 and 211, 400 and 402, 401 and 403, 408 and 409, 414 and 415, and 516 and 518 revealed the call light strings were short and a heavy corrosive substance was noted on the metal base. On 05/02/23 at 10:20 AM, during an interview with Maintenance Director, he explained he has been at the facility for a month and a half. He revealed no one had reported anything to him about bathroom call lights. He explained he is not aware of a maintenance logbook, or a computer system for maintenance requests and that the requests that he had received for needed repairs, had been verbal requests. On 05/02/23 at 10:30 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she explained she was not aware of bathroom call lights were not working. The DON revealed the nurses and Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) are responsible for making sure the call lights are within a resident's reach and functioning properly, as it is important for residents to get assistance as quickly as possible to ensure that their needs are met. On 05/02/23 at 10:35 AM, during an interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #11, she revealed that none of her residents had reported their bathroom call lights not working. In an observation with CNA #11, it was confirmed that the call lights did not work in the bathrooms in room [ROOM NUMBER], 101, and in the joining bathroom for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. On 05/02/23 at 10:42 AM, during an interview with the Administrator, he reported he was not aware of bathroom call lights not working. He revealed he expects maintenance to check all call lights weekly, during weekly rounds and make repairs as needed or reported. The Administrator revealed the facility does have a work order system for maintenance. He confirmed that each nurse's station has a work order book for staff to record needed repairs and that maintenance should check the book daily and perform the requested repairs. On 05/02/23 at 10:45 AM, during an interview with CNA #12, she confirmed the bathroom call light for rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had not worked for a long time and remembered notifying the nurses. On 05/02/23 at 10:46 AM, during an interview with CNA #5 for 400 hall, she explained the call lights in the bathrooms haven't worked for several months and the problem was reported to the last Maintenance Director. Record review on 11:10 AM on 05/02/23, revealed a Maintenance Book was noted at the nurse's station with a record for work order dated 04/16/2023, completed by LPN #13 on night shift. A record review of the Maintenance Work Order with date 04/16/2023 revealed, . rooms listed 203, 206, 209 call lights not showing up on call system or outside door . The work order was blank on the completed part of the form. On 05/02/23 at 11:45 AM , during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6, she explained she mostly works the 200 hall and reported some of the call lights have not worked for a long period of time. She revealed she reported the problem to the Administrator and Maintenance Director and has even put the information in the maintenance log. She confirmed she had written a maintenance work order in the maintenance book dated 04/16/2023. On 05/02/23 at 12:20 PM, during an interview with Resident #49, she explained when she was in room [ROOM NUMBER] and tried to use the bathroom call light, it didn't work. She reported her roommate used the call light in the room to call for help. She told the nurse and the CNA that the bathroom call light did not work. A record review of Resident #49's admission Record revealed the facility admitted resident on 12/13/2022 with the diagnoses of Acute Myocardial Infarction, Unspecified and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unspecified. A record review of Resident # 49's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/18/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact, and Section H revealed Resident #49 was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. A record review of Resident #4's admission Record revealed the facility admitted resident on 02/24/2023 with the diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Nephropathy and Muscle Weakness (Generalized). A record review of Resident #4's admission MDS with an ARD of 03/03/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #4 was occasionally incontinent of urine. A record review of Resident #5's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/05/2014 with the diagnoses of Poly osteoarthritis and Intervertebral Disc Disorders with Radiculopathy, Lumbar Region. A record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/10/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #5 was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. A record review of Resident 12's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/09/2018 with the diagnoses of Heart Failure, Unspecified and Flaccid Hemiplegia affecting Right Dominant Side. A record review of Resident #12's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/16/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 14, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #12 was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. A record review of Resident #21's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/19/2018 with the diagnoses of [NAME] Fascial Fibromatosis (Dupuytren) and Muscle Weakness. A record review of Resident #21's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/10/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 12, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #21 was always continent of bowel and bladder. A record review of Resident #32's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/22/2022 with the diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications and Primary Osteoarthritis, Unspecified Site. A record review of Resident #32's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/16/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #32 was always continent of bowel and bladder. A record review of Resident #37's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/06/2022 with the diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbances and Psychotic Disturbance. A record review of Resident #37's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/10/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #37 was always continent of bowel and bladder. A record review of Resident #38's admission Record revealed the facility admitted resident on 09/09/2016 with the diagnoses Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Unspecified and Anemia, Unspecified. A record review of Resident #38's Annual MDS with an ARD of 03/08/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 09, which indicated moderately cognitively impaired, and Resident #38 was occasionally incontinent of urine and bowel. A record review of Resident #44's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #44 on 07/29/2019 with the diagnoses of Arthropathy and Chronic Pain Syndrome. A record review of Resident #44's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/10/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 06, which indicated server cognitively impaired, and Resident #44 was always continent of bowel and bladder. A record review of Resident #46's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/02/2023 with the diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia, Moderate, With Mood Disturbance and Muscles Weakness (Generalized). A record review of Resident #46's Annual MDS with an ARD of 02/14/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 13, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #46 was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. A record review of Resident #57's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #57 on 021/15/2020 with the diagnoses of Difficulty in Walking, Not Elsewhere Classified and Dementia. A record review of Resident #57's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/16/2022 revealed a BIMS score of 03, which indicated severely cognitively impaired, and Resident #57 was frequently incontinent of urine and bowel. A record review of Resident #60's admission Record revealed the facility admitted resident on 09/15/2021 with the diagnoses of Contracture of Right Wrist and Anemia, Unspecified. A record review of Resident #60's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 03/10/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 09, which indicated moderately cognitively impaired, and Resident #60 was always continent of bowel and bladder. A record review of Resident #65's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 06/29/2023 with the diagnoses of Stiffness of Unspecified Joint, Not Elsewhere Classified and Contracture of Right Elbow. A record review of Resident #65's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/01/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 07, which indicated moderately cognitively impaired, and Resident #65 is occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. A record review of Resident #69's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 08/24/2022 with the diagnoses of COVID-19 and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side. A record review of Resident #69's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 02/20/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #69 was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. A record review of Resident #71's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/30/2021 with the diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side and Muscle Weakness. A record review of Resident #71's Annual MDS with an ARD of 04/17/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 14, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #71 was always continent of bowel and bladder. A record review of Resident #81's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/28/2022 with the diagnoses Myalgia, Unspecified Site and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. A record review of Resident #81's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/11/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #81 was occasionally always continent of bowel and bladder. A record review of Resident #87's admission Record revealed the facility admitted resident on 07/06/2022 with the diagnoses of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Chronic and Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Moderate. A record review of Resident #87's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/05/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident # 87 was always continent of bowel and bladder. A record review of Resident #96's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 02/03/2023 with the diagnoses of Leukemia, Unspecified Not Having Achieved Remission and Muscle Weakness (Generalized). A record review of Resident #96's admission MDS with an ARD of 02/13/2023 revealed a BIMS score of 13, which indicated cognitively intact, and Resident #96 was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan which included: Immediate Action started on 05/02/2023 at 5:45 PM On 05/02/2023 at 6:00pm, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met to ensure a functioning call light system was available for resident bathrooms. A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and reviewed policies and procedures for changes. RCA determined the facility hired a new Maintenance Director who was not aware of the maintenance repair request forms located at the nurses' stations and will be educated. Attendees were the Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Maintenance Director, Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Regional Plant Operations (RPO), Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), and Human Resources Director (HRD). The Medical Director (MD) attended by phone. A review of policy and procedures were: Call Bell System-Inoperable and Communication Failure Nurse Call System which required no changes. On 05/02/2023 at 6:05pm, RVPO educated the Maintenance Director on the location of the maintenance repair request forms located at each nurse's stations for staff to use when notifying maintenance department of any issue related to ensure a functioning call light system. On 05/02/2023 at 6:10pm, RDCS initiated education on Call Bell System-Inoperable and Communication Failure Nurse Call System to ensure a functioning call light system. No current staff or new hire will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/02/2023 at 6:15pm, the emergency call light system for resident bathrooms was audited by observation for 107 residents on census to ensure proper functioning of call system by the Regional Plant Operations (RPO), RVPO, and ED. There were 16 resident bathrooms affecting 26 residents in the facility. Resident bathrooms #101, #103, #109, #203, #204, #206, #209, #409, #414, and #415 were repaired on 5/2/23 by the RPO. Resident bathrooms #211, #308, #310, #400, #402, and #403 had a bell installed by the RPO and ED on 5/2/23 related to the annunciator board light functioning but not sounding at the nurses' station. The residents residing in #211, #308, #310, #400, #402, and #403 were shown a demonstration by the RDCS on 05/02/2023 on how to use the bell in the bathroom. On 05/02/2023 at 7:00pm, an outside contracted vendor was called and scheduled to come to inspect our nurse call light system to ensure additional verification of proper functioning, on May 3, 2023. The facility alleges all corrective actions were completed to remove the immediacy on May 2, 2023, and the Immediate Jeopardy was removed May 3, 2023. The State Agency (SA) validated the facility's Corrective Actions: 1. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/02/2023 at 6:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met to ensure a functioning call light system was available for resident bathrooms. A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and reviewed policies and procedures for changes. RCA determined the facility hired a new Maintenance Director who was not aware of the maintenance repair request forms located at the nurses' stations and will be educated. Attendees were the Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Maintenance Director, Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Regional Plant Operations (RPO), Regional Director of Clinical Services (RDCS), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), and Human Resources Director (HRD). The Medical Director (MD) attended by phone. A review of policy and procedures were: Call Bell System-Inoperable and Communication Failure Nurse Call System which required no changes. 2. On 05/8/2023 at 11:35 AM, in an interview with Maintenance Director stated that stated he attended the in-service on 5/2/2023 in reference to call lights function. in service on call lights. He stated he will keep a daily log of checking call lights daily. He stated they have a quote on getting a whole new system. 3. A record review on 05/09/2023 at 12:00 PM, of the Education in-service record for Maintenance Director. 4. On 05/09/2023 at 12:10 PM, an interview with RVPO stated all parties attended the QAPI meeting. She stated the medical director attended the meeting by phone and came into the facility and signed the sign in sheet. 5. At 12:30 PM on 05/09/2023, during an interview with the Administrator, she confirmed she was in-serviced on call light system and the procedure if the call light system is inoperable. 6. A record review on 05/09/23, of the bathroom call light audit revealed it was done on 05/02/2023. 7. A record review of the Senior Maintenance Director outside contractors came in the building in related to call lights. 8. A recorded review of the call light audit schedule revealed no concerns. All rooms were checked. 9. A record review of the staff in-service on call lights were signed by all staff. 10. On 50/09/2023 at 1:00 PM, SA validated with all staff about call light in-service on call lights and use of alternative bells. The staff validated the steps to take if call lights are not working.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility neglected to provide physician ordered...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility neglected to provide physician ordered services that were necessary for five (5) of 24 sampled residents. This resulted in actual harm for Residents #31, #75, #87, and #254 and had the likelihood of serious harm for Resident # 34. The facility's failure to provide services necessary to avoid physical harm caused serious harm as Resident #31 experienced decreased range of motion and mobility, Resident #75 was hospitalized for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Resident #87 developed a infection of a vascular stent placement, and Resident #254 was hospitalized due to sepsis. There was likelihood of harm for Resident #34 due to a delay in follow-up appointment for a supra pubic catheter placement. This non-compliance put these residents and other residents in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 11/21/22 when Resident #87 was referred to a vascular surgeon and the facility did not follow physician's orders for follow-up appointment. The SA notified the facility Administrator of the IJ and provided an IJ template on 5/5/23 at 12:23 PM. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 5/7/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed and the IJ was removed on 5/8/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan on 5/9/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 5/8/23 prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for 42 CFR 483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, F600 was lowered from a K to a scope and severity of an E, while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation & Misappropriation policy, revised on 11/16/2022, revealed , Employees of the center are charged with a continuing obligation to treat residents so they are free from .neglect .No employee may at any time commit an act of .neglect .Definitions .Neglect is the failure of the center, its employees or service provides to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress . Resident #31 During an interview on 5/3/23 at 3:30 PM, with the Nurse Practitioner (NP), she revealed Resident #31 had orders to follow up with an orthopedic surgeon in February 2023, but the resident still had not been seen by the surgeon. The NP said Resident #31 could not receive therapy services until he was assessed by the Orthopedic Surgeon and cleared for weight bearing status. She explained that Resident #31 currently had a non-weight bearing status and could not get out the bed until he was seen by surgeon. The NP stated that because he did not go to the post operative appointment, the resident's surgical staples were embedded in his surgical wound, and she had to call the orthopedic surgeon to obtain an order to remove the staples. She also commented that his left foot was turned outward to the left side now and she thought his foot would have to be broken again before anything could be done for him. She said she had talked to the Administrator and the DON several times explaining that Resident #31 needed to go to his post operative appointments. During an observation and interview with Resident #31, on 05/04/23 at 09:42 AM, revealed he was lying in bed wearing a left leg brace that was not secured to his leg, a boot on his left foot with the foot turned outward, and had a right lower extremity amputation. He explained that he was hit by a car prior to entering the facility. Resident #31 said he wanted to get out of his room because he had not left the room since he was admitted on [DATE]. He confirmed that the facility failed to send him to a follow up visit with his orthopedic doctor. He said he was miserable staying in this room all the time watching television and he commented that he had lost one leg and he might lose another leg because it had been so long since he saw the orthopedic doctor. During an interview on 5/04/23 at 10:35 AM, the facility's Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) confirmed Resident #31 could not participate in therapy services until he was assessed by his orthopedic surgeon to obtain a weight bearing status. The PTA said he had ordered the resident a prosthesis for the newly amputated extremity, but it could not be used because the resident did not have a weight bearing status. The PTA said until the resident was assessed by the orthopedic surgeon, their hands are tied. Record review of the Order Recap Report revealed Resident #31 had a Physician's Order, dated 2/1/23 and discontinued on 3/8/23 for, Follow up appointment: Feb (February) 14, 2023 10:15 A . Post-Op visit . and a Physician's Order, dated 3/8/23 for, Schedule F/U appointment with Orthopedics . Record review of the facility's Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note dated 2/14/23 at 15:44 (3:44 PM) for, .Wound care nurse requests evaluation of multiple areas with sutures, as he had a F/U appointment today with Orthopedics but did not go, will review the reason why with DON. Did document the following appointments on my last visit to be sure he did not miss them. Will again review all appointments with DON . revealed Resident #31 missed follow up appointment. NP will follow up with DON. Record review of the facility's Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note, dated 2/15/23 at 10:44 AM for, .Reviewed appointments with DON and information for each appointment documented in my note. Yesterday's appointment was rescheduled as the facility's transportation department already had a full calendar prior to his admission . Record review of the facility's Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note, dated 2/28/23 at 12:35 PM, for, NP/F/U stitch removal .Reassessed this resident's multiple surgical areas to see how they are doing after removing sutures last week to his Left leg and the Right AKA (Above Knee Amputation) stump .some sutures remain. On staff attempt to remove sutures some were too embedded to be able to remove. The staff nurse asked me if I could look at them and attempt to remove the remaining sutures. Removed remaining sutures from Right stump and Left thigh area .continues to wear a [NAME] brace to LLE (Left Lower Extremity) and remains NWB (non-weight bearing) LLE and s/p (status post) RLE (Right Lower Extremity) AKA . Record review of the Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note, dated 3/8/23 at 11:44 AM, for, .This resident asked if he could start receiving PT (Physical Therapy). I discussed this with the PT department, they are waiting for Weight bearing status update as he is NWB per his discharge paperwork .He had a F/U appointment scheduled for Feb. 14, 2023 that was missed and rescheduled for [DATE] according to the DON but when they called to confirm the 27th appointment prior to transport the DON states she was told they did not have any F/U appointment on the books with Ortho. for this patient at all and no other appointment has been made as of today as I spoke with the scheduling department myself .this AM and she confirmed no F/U Ortho. Appointment for this patient at this time. I discussed this with the DON, she is to schedule that F/U, after that visit we can get weight bearing status and be able to move forward with his PT/OT according to Ortho's recommendations . Record review of the Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Nursing Progress Note dated 3/8/23 at 11:44 AM, for, Called (Proper Name of Orthopedic Facility) .in reference to f/u appt for resident .schedule is filled at the time and he does not have any openings . Record review of the Progress Notes revealed Resident #31 had a Physician Progress Note, dated 4/25/23 at 13:25 (1:25 PM) for, .He is asking when he remove his left leg brace. I explained to him he has to see Ortho and get the order to remove this brace from them. He voiced concern that he has missed several appointments to go back and see Ortho because of transportation, as he is being told. I spoke with DON and Administrator concerning this resident and his return appointments, they both state they are working on it as it has been a transportation issue. I expressed the importance of getting him back to the Orthopedic ASAP (As soon as possible) for F/U of his surgeries and hospital stay prior to admission on [DATE]. They both expressed understanding . Review of the medical record revealed there was no documentation indicating that Resident #31 was seen by the Orthopedic Surgeon as ordered. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #31 on 1/31/23 with diagnoses including Displaced Fracture of Right Femur and Encounter for Orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. A record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/07/23, revealed Resident #31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident #75 During an interview on 05/01/23 at 03:20 PM, with Resident #75, she stated the facility had failed to schedule and keep follow up appointments for her to see her cardiologist or pulmonologist. The resident said she was concerned because she had been hospitalized for pneumonia and had difficulty breathing. She did not understand why she could not go to her doctor's appointments. During an interview on 5/3/23 at 1:00 PM, with License Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, she confirmed the resident did not go to see her Cardiologist and Pulmonologist because the facility van was inaccessible for the resident and the facility must pay the local Ambulance service in advance for non-emergent transporting of residents. LPN #2 also confirmed the resident was not sent to the hospital for a chest x-ray (CXR). LPN #2 revealed she was given this information by the previous Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator. During an interview on 5/3/23 at 4:00 PM, with the current DON, she revealed she was not the DON at the time the Nurse Practitioner (NP) placed the order for the resident to have follow up appointments with the Cardiologist and Pulmonologist. The DON also said she was not the DON when the NP wrote an order for the resident to get a CXR at the hospital. The DON stated she was aware that the local ambulance company required payment in advance for non-emergency transport services and that Resident #75 was not sent to see her Cardiologist and Pulmonologist. The DON also confirmed the resident was not sent to the hospital for a CXR due to transportation problems with the facility. During an interview on 5/3/23 at 3:30 PM, with the NP, she said she wrote an order for the resident to follow up with her Cardiologist and Pulmonologist in January of 2023, and the facility failed to follow her orders. The NP also said she ordered a portable CXR in January 2023 for the resident, but she exceeded 300 pounds, and the technician could not get a good picture. The NP then wrote an order to schedule the resident to have a CXR at the hospital, which was not carried out. The NP stated that she talked to the Administrator and the previous DON about residents not going to ordered appointments. The Administrator told her that the Resident was too large to fit in the company van and that he had to pay the local ambulance in advance before they would transfer any of the residents for non-emergency appointments. The NP reported that she told the Administrator, You admitted the residents now you must take care of their needs. The NP stated that had the facility sent the resident to the follow up visit with the Cardiologist, Pulmonologist, and CXR, the resident would not have had to be hospitalized with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and pneumonia. Record review of the Order Summary Report with Active Orders as of 05/03/2023, revealed Resident #75 had a Physician's Order, dated 1/3/23 to Schedule appointment in [NAME], MS with this resident's Cardiologist and Pulmonologist as she is c/o (complaining of) increased heart palpitations and Shortness of breath. She states she has not been seen in over a year. Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident #75 revealed a Physician Progress Note dated 1/24/23 at 18:19 (6:19 PM) for, .The resident reports she is experiencing occasional heart palpitations, states she just feels like her heart is running away from her and she feel short of breath when this happens. Reviewed V/S (vital signs) and noted her BP (blood pressure) is running higher than it should be .Will discuss the status of her order to schedule a F/U (follow up) appointment with her cardiologist and pulmonologist in [NAME], MS that is known to her for a checkup . POC (Plan of Care) .3. CXR c/o SOB (Shortness of Breath). Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident #75 revealed a Nursing Progress Note dated 1/26/23 at 18:20 (6:20 PM) for, (Proper Name of Portable X-ray Company) present at this time to do portable CXR, unable to perform r/t (related to) res (resident) weight exceeding 300 pounds per policy .DON notified .NP notified then instructed for CXR to be scheduled and res to be transferred to hosp (hospital) to be obtained . Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident #75 revealed a Nursing Progress Note, dated 3/1/23 at 10:10 (AM) for, .She states she is having more shortness of breath .her thighs and lower abdomen feel tight .POC .2. Place a Foley (indwelling) catheter today . Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident #75 revealed a Nursing Progress Note, dated 3/15/23 at 13:38 (1:38 PM), for, Res c/o SOB with difficulty breathing to this nurse .NP present in facility, made aware. N.O. (New Order) to send res to (Proper Name of Local Hospital) . Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident #75 revealed a Nursing Progress Note, dated 3/15/23 at 18:14 (6:14 PM), for, .admitted .with dx-CHF, pulmonary disease, stable condition noted. Review of the medical record revealed there was no documentation indicating that Resident #75 was seen by the Cardiologist or Pulmonologist, and there was no documentation that she received the diagnostic CXR as ordered. Record review of a hospital History and Physical Note, dated 3/15/2023 at 17:02 (5:02 PM), revealed, .CT (Computed Tomography) of the chest showed evidence of pneumonitis and possible atypical pneumonia. She was admitted . Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #75 on 9/12/22 and she had diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Morbid Obesity, and Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure. Record review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/29/23 revealed Resident #79 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. Resident #87 During an interview on 05/03/23 at 03:30 PM, the NP stated that Resident #87 had an artificial implant because of poor circulation that was placed by the vascular surgeon prior to his admission to the facility on 7/6/22. The NP said the resident has had complaints of pain and has had recurrent infections with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus (MRSA) in that area because the implant needed to be removed. The NP said she wrote orders last year for the facility to make an appointment to follow up with the vascular surgeon, but the facility kept changing the appointment, and he still has not seen the surgeon. The NP stated that she had asked the DON why the resident had not seen the surgeon and was told it was because the facility's van was being repaired and the dialysis residents have top priority related to transportation. The NP said she told the DON that the resident should not have to continue to be in pain or suffer from infections because the facility had transportation problems. During an interview on 05/03/23 at 04:00 PM, with Resident #87, he confirmed he had pain and recurrent infections in his thigh. The resident said he talked to the NP and explained that his thigh was hurting and that he needed to have the implant removed and the NP said she would have the facility to set up an appointment. The resident was unable to recall the exact month that the NP said she was going to get him appointment, but he knew it was last year. The resident said that his appointments kept getting changed because the facility vans were not working, but he had an appointment scheduled for tomorrow (5/4/23). Record review of the Order Summary Report dated 5/3/23, revealed Resident #87 had a Physician's Order, dated 11/21/22, for refer to (Proper Name of Physician) vascular surgeon at (Proper Name of Medical Clinic), a Physician's Order, dated 3/17/23, for Get appointment with physician at (Proper Name of Medical Clinic) .ASAP (as soon as possible) .related to Unspecified Open Wound, Left Thigh ., and a Physician's Order, dated 4/11/23, for Get appointment with (Proper Name of Physician) vascular surgeon .as soon as possible to have artificial implant removed from Left Groin/Thigh . Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident #87, revealed a Physician Progress Note, dated 4/11/23 at 15:00 (3:00 PM) for .The resident states he is having pain to his left groin/thigh. He just completed antibiotic therapy for MRSA to his left groin/thigh wound where he has an artificial implant placed by the vascular surgeon .The implant has given him trouble since insertion, and he was trying to get it removed when he was first admitted here last year. He had infection at that time and keep getting recurrent infection usually MRSA to this same area. Order placed to get him an appointment with (Proper Name of Physician) ASAP now that he has just completed another round of antibiotics on the 31st of March for MRSA. He is c/o pain to this area and leg .Getting him to the surgeon for possible removal of this implant will be what will help him the most to get rid of his pain .POC .Get appointment with .vascular surgeon .as soon as possible to have artificial implant removed from Left Groin/Thigh. During an interview on 05/04/23 at 10:48 AM, with the DON, she confirmed the residents' appointments with the vascular surgeon were changed several times because there were problems with both facility vans. The DON explained that one van was out of commision and the other van was in the shop being repaired. The DON said that she tried to rearrange several appointments and that Resident # 87's appointments got lost in the cracks because of all the appointments that had to be canceled. The DON said when she realized the resident's appointment was not made, she called the surgeon's office and asked the nurse to set up an appointment. She confirmed that the resident had complaints of pain and that he had been treated for infections twice since the implant was placed. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #87 on 07/06/2022, and he had diagnoses including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Depression. Record review of the Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 04/05/23 revealed Resident #87 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Record review of the Microbiology report for Wound Cultures collected 3/21/23 and reported 3/23/23 for Resident #87 revealed a specimen from the Thigh was collected and resulted in .Moderate Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) . Record review of the Microbiology report for Wound Cultures collected 4/11/23 and reported 4/15/23 for Resident #87 revealed a specimen was collected from the Thigh and resulted in Light .(MRSA) . Resident #254 On 05/03/23 at 10:10 AM, during an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, she explained Resident #254 was transferred to the hospital from a wound care appointment and has not returned to the facility. RN #1 stated that she scheduled Resident #254 for a wound care appointment on the 4/14/23, but the facility was unable to transport her because of transportation problems. On 05/04/23 at 09:10 AM, during a phone interview with Resident #254's niece, she said she was not aware that Resident #254 had missed the wound care appointment scheduled on 4/14/23, but she was informed that the resident had an appointment scheduled for 04/18/23. On 05/08/23 at 11:10 AM, during a phone interview with the local would care clinic, the staff revealed Resident #254 arrived for the wound appointment. Upon arrival, her vital signs were abnormal, she had a fever, and was lethargic, so the clinic sent her to the Emergency Room, and she was diagnosed with Sepsis. Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident #254 revealed a Nursing Progress Note dated 4/14/23 at 13:53 (1:53 PM) for unable to take resident to wound care apt (appointment) today will contact family and wound care to reschedule. Resident #34 During an interview on 5/3/23 at 3:30 PM, with the NP, she revealed Resident #34 had a suprapubic catheter placed on 3/24/23 and had orders to return to the Urology for a follow up on 4/19/23. The facility changed the appointment to 5/9/23 because of transportation issues and then changed it again to 5/11/23 due to continued transportation problems. The NP said that she called the Urologists' office on 4/25/23 to ask if she could change the suprapubic catheter since his appointment had been postponed due to transportation problems. The doctor replied, Absolutely not. The doctor then said the resident needed to be in her office by tomorrow because she was concerned about the resident developing an infection. The NP said she took her phone to the Administrator and let him talk to the doctor. She said the Administrator called the facility's transportation staff and rearranged dialysis residents so the resident could be at the Urologists' office the following day. The NP said that if she had not called the doctor herself, the resident would not have had his newly placed suprapubic catheter changed timely. During an interview on 05/14/23 at 08:16 AM, with Resident #34, he confirmed his follow up appointment was scheduled for 4/19/23 and the facility changed the appointment due to transportation issues. Resident #34 said he was told the facility van was in the shop and the facility had to reschedule his appointment to 5/9/23. He explained that later the staff came to him and said they had to change his appointment again to 5/11/23 because they were not sure when the van would be ready. Resident #34 said he was concerned because the doctor told him it was especially important for him to return for his follow up visit in a month. Record review of the Progress Notes revealed Resident #34 had a Physician Progress Note, dated 4/25/23 at 13:56 (1:56 PM), .He is concerned with his newly placed Suprapubic catheter needing changed as it was placed 3/24/23. He was told by (Proper Name of Physician) she would change it for the first time on his return visit for F/U, the appointment was made for 4/19/23, then changed by the facility because of transportation to 5/9/23 and then again because of transportation to 5/11/23. I called the nurse of (Proper Name of Physician) to question whether we, the staff of (Proper Name of Facility) or myself (NP) could change the catheter for the first time since his appointments had been postponed. The nurse states No, the Dr. has to change it for the first time and he cannot wait until 5/11/23 for this to be done, as a matter of fact he needs to be in the office by tomorrow to get it done, as they are worried of an infection developing should he wait that long after surgery to have it changed or even see the Dr. for F/U after surgery. Spoke with Administrator .he contacted the van driver and rearranged some dialysis transports and stated they can have the resident in [NAME] .at 2pm, the nurse put him on the book for 2pm tomorrow . Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #34 on 06/22/2020 with a diagnosis of Spina Bifida. Record review of the Significant Change in Status MDS with an ARD of 02/20/23 revealed Resident #34 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. During an interview on 5/3/23 at 2:00 PM, with the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the local ambulance company, he confirmed they required the facility to pay in advance for non-emergency transportation services. During an interview on 05/04/23 at 08:07 AM, with the Medical Director (MD), he stated that he was told at the last Quality Assurance (QA) meeting that the facility had rescheduled some resident appointments because of transportation problems. The MD said he was told the facility had addressed the problem and it was resolved. The MD said he did not know that Resident #37 and Resident #81 had not been able to see their surgeons and recalled stating at that meeting that those residents needed to follow up immediately with their surgeons. The MD also stated that the residents not having transportation to appointments is unacceptable and must be taken care of immediately. The doctor said he thought the transportation problems were resolved. During an interview on 05/04/23 at 09:24 AM, with CNA #1, she said she had been the van transportation driver and took residents to dialysis. CNA #1 confirmed the facility had communication problems with appointments because different nurses and the DON were making appointments. The resident appointments were clashing with each other which caused a lot of confusion and some residents missed appointments because they were scheduled at the same time. During an interview on 05/04/23 at 09:58 AM, with CNA #2, he said he drives the facility's transportation van, but he does not schedule the appointments. CNA #2 stated the facility van was placed in the shop for repairs three (3) times since he started driving the van in February 2023. CNA #2 confirmed the facility rented a van, and dialysis residents were the top priority for transports. CNA #2 said this facility is too big for one van and needs two vans to meet the residents' needs. On 05/04/23 at 11:58 AM, during an interview with the Administrator, revealed one van was disabled in February and the other van kept breaking down and was placed in the shop several times. The Administrator said he emailed his corporate office to let them know that he did not have transportation for the residents to go out to their appointments. He stated that he rented a van to help with dialysis appointments and some local appointments. The corporate office said they were working with the insurance company to try to get another van because the disabled van had not been replaced. The Administrator confirmed that one van could not take all the residents to dialysis and to local and out of town appointments. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan which included: Immediate Action started on 05/05/2023 at 12:23 PM: Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. On 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met to ensure the residents receive needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to include needed medical services as physician ordered, to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, to prevent residents from experiencing avoidable loss of ROM, to ensure facility administration is administered in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents receiving physician ordered services, and to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained. A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and reviewed policies and procedures for changes. RCA revealed the policy was not followed and one of two vans was out of commission. RCA revealed former ED only rented a van for two weeks during the timeframe one van was out of commission and did not continue to rent a van nor secure other means of transportation even though Company approval was given. Attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). A review of policy and procedures were: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. On 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. On 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

Based on interviews, record review, and job description review, the facility's administration failed to use its resources effectively to ensure residents received physician-ordered services for five (...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review, and job description review, the facility's administration failed to use its resources effectively to ensure residents received physician-ordered services for five (5) of 24 residents reviewed, with the likelihood to affected any resident who needed outside transportation. Resident #31, Resident #34, Resident #75, Resident #87, and Resident #254. Serious harm occurred as a result of the facility's Administration's failure to ensure residents received physician-ordered services which caused Resident #31 to have decreased mobility, Resident #75 to be hospitalized , Resident #87 to have a wound infection, and Resident #254 to have sepsis. There was a likelihood of harm for Resident #34 due to a delay in changing a newly placed supra pubic catheter. The failure placed these residents, and other residents who are at risk in a situation that was likely to cause serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 11/21/22 when Resident #87 was referred to a vascular surgeon and the facility did not follow physician's orders. The Facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/5/23 at 12:23 PM and provided an IJ Template. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan on 5/7/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed and the IJ was removed on 5/8/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan on 5/9/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 5/8/23 prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for 42 CFR 483.70 Administration, F835 was lowered from a K to a scope and severity of a E, while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: A review of the job description entitled Executive Director I documented, .The primary purpose of the Executive Director is to direct the day-to-day functions of the facility in accordance with current federal, state, and local standards, guidelines and regulations that govern nursing facilities to ensure that the highest degree of quality care can be always provided to our residents at all times .you are delegated the administrative authority, responsibility, and accountability necessary for carrying out your assigned duties . Responsible for day-to-day clinical and administrative activities of the facility .Duties and Responsibilities . Schedule regular meeting with direct report staff to provide supervision, ensure communication and to monitor facility operations .Support and guide the facility's quality improvement process .Attend to overall operation of the facility . On 05/04/23 at 03:40 PM, in an interview with the Administrator regarding transportation issues and residents missing outside medical appointments, he revealed that the local ambulance service had stopped all non-emergency transportation in June of 2022, when he first started working at the facility. He also revealed one of the facility's vans broke down in February 2023, due to an automobile accident and the facility's second van kept breaking down and needing repairs. He explained the facility had to move outside appointments around during this time, due to the lack of transportation. The Administrator confirmed that he had notified the Corporate office of the facility's issues with transportation and was told that they were working with the insurance company to purchase a replacement van. He explained that the corporate office had rented a van, but only for a few weeks and there were several times that he had no other option than to use the local ambulance company for non-emergent transportation for dialysis residents and had to pay between $400-800 out of his pocket and wait for the corporate office to reimburse him. The Administrator noted when the physicians wrote orders for appointments, the Director of Nurses (DON) would set up the appointments. However, due to lack of transportation, many times the scheduled appointments had to be canceled and re-scheduled. The Administrator confirmed he informed the Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO) of every issue. However, he could not afford to continue to pay for transportation out of his pocket and the corporate office had not directed him to rent a van. On 05/04/23 at 4:40 PM, in an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON), she confirmed she set up all the physician appointments. She stated that many times the re-scheduled appointments had to be canceled due to lack of transportation. The DON revealed she informed the Administrator of all missed appointments. On 05/08/23 at 5:00 PM, in an interview with the RVPO, she confirmed she was informed when the van was disabled on 2/10/23. She stated she told the Administrator to schedule appointments as needed and use petty cash or pay for the non-emergent transportation with the local ambulance company and fill out expense report. She stated the expense report takes one week to one and half weeks to reimburse. She stated she was not aware of residents missing appointments. She stated the Administrator did not follow company policy. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan which included: Immediate Action started on 05/05/2023 at 12:23 PM: * Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. * Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. * Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. * On 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met to ensure the residents receive needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to include needed medical services as physician ordered, to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, to prevent residents from experiencing avoidable loss of ROM, to ensure facility administration is administered in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents receiving physician ordered services, and to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained. A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and reviewed policies and procedures for changes. RCA revealed the policy was not followed and one of two vans was out of commission. RCA revealed former ED only rented a van for two weeks during the timeframe one van was out of commission and did not continue to rent a van nor secure other means of transportation even though Company approval was given. * Attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). A review of policy and procedures were: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. * On 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. * On 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. * On 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. * On 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. * On 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. * On 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. Resident #254 is no longer in the facility as of 04/19/2023 related to transferred to the hospital. * On 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. * On 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. * On 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. * On 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM. * The facility alleges all corrective actions were completed to remove the immediacy on May 7, 2023, and the Immediate Jeopardy was removed May 8, 2023. The State Agency (SA) validated the facility's Corrective Actions: 1.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. 2.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. 3.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. 4.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met and covered needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, Comprehensive Care Plans, residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, facility administration and review of an effective QAPI program is maintained. The SA determined a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and policies and procedures were reviewed for changes. The SA determined attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). The SA determined a review of policy and procedures were performed for: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. 5.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 6.) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. 7.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 8.) The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 9.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:20 PM, the RDCS initiated education with the RN MDS Nurses to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to prevent further resident complications for residents' treatment related to a vascular implant and orthopedic and vascular appointments. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 10.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:30 PM, the DON initiated education to licensed nurses to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 11.) The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. 12. ) The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. 13. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews/record review on 05/07/2023 at 8:00 AM, RDCS 1, RDCS 2, RDCS 3 (Regional Director of Clinical Services 3), and RN Treatment Nurse completed assessments on current residents to ensure medical stability and not requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. The SA validated no residents at risk were identified. 14. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. 15. The State Agency (SA) validated through observation/interviews and record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. 16. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. 17. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0865 (Tag F0865)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure transportation was provi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure transportation was provided for outside medical services for five (5) of 24 sampled residents, with the likelihood to affect any resident who required outside transportation. The facility's failure to maintain an effective QAPI program placed residents who require outside transportation at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. This caused Resident #31 to experience decreased mobility, Resident #75 to be hospitalized , Resident #87 to develop a wound infection, and Resident #254 to become septic. There was a likelihood of harm for Resident #34 due to the delay in changing a newly placed supra pubic catheter. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began on 11/21/22 when Resident #87 was referred to a vascular surgeon and the facility did not follow physician's orders. The Facility Administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/5/23 at 12:23 PM and provided an IJ Template. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan on 5/7/23, in which they alleged all corrective actions to remove the IJ were completed and the IJ was removed on 5/8/23. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan on 5/9/23 and determined the IJ was removed on 5/8/23 prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for 42 CFR 483.75 (a)(1) Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, F865 was lowered from a K to a scope and severity of an E, while the facility develops a plan of correction to monitor the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) revised 10/24/2022, revealed, Policy: The center and organization has a comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life .Program Design and Scope 1. The center's QAPI program is on-going comprehensive review of care and services provided to residents. Including but not limited to: a. Medical b. Clinical care .Important functional areas may include but are not limited to .Quality of care .g. Continuity of care .Review of activities may include but not limited to .d. Interdisciplinary care planning .Leadership: The Central Executive Director is accountable for the overall implementation and functioning of the QAPI program. This includes but is not limited to .b) Identify priorities c) Ensures adequate resources .e) Ensures corrective actions are implemented to address identified problems in systems f) Evaluates the effectiveness of actions .4. The program is a coordinated effort among departments and services within the organization that involves leadership working with input from Center staff, residents and families Identifying Quality Deficiencies and Corrective Actions: The center will monitor department performance systems to identify issues or adverse events .15. If a quality deficiency is identified, the committee will oversee the development of corrective action(s) . Record review of the facility's QAPI sign-in sheet for a meeting held 4/27/23 revealed the Administrator, Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing (DON) were in attendance. During an interview on 5/3/23 at 4:00 PM, the DON confirmed she was aware that the facility had to change residents' physician appointments due to transportation issues and that the facility had to pay in advance for non-emergency transportation with the local ambulance company. She said that it was discussed in the QAPI meeting, and the team decided to rent a van until the facility van was repaired. They also decided to wait until the insurance company finished the negotiations regarding the purchase of a new facility van. During an interview on 05/04/23 at 08:07 AM, with the Medical Director (MD) confirmed he attended QAPI meetings quarterly. The MD said he was told at the last quarterly meeting that the facility had rescheduled some resident appointments because the facility was having problems with transportation, but the facility was addressing the problem and it was resolved. The MD also said he did not know that residents had missed follow up appointments with surgeons. The MD said he remembered stating at the QAPI meeting that residents needed to follow up immediately with their appointments. During an interview on 05/04/23 at 10:32 AM, with the Administrator, he confirmed the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) Interdisciplinary Team met quarterly to discuss high risk issues. The Administrator stated the facility met in April in which they discussed the transportation van issues and that the corporate office was working with the insurance company to purchase another van. The Administrator confirmed the interventions put in place were not effective. The facility provided an acceptable Removal Plan which included: Immediate Action started on 05/05/2023 at 12:23 PM: Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. On 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met to ensure the residents receive needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to include needed medical services as physician ordered, to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, to prevent residents from experiencing avoidable loss of ROM, to ensure facility administration is administered in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents receiving physician ordered services, and to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained. A Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and reviewed policies and procedures for changes. RCA revealed the policy was not followed and one of two vans was out of commission. RCA revealed former ED only rented a van for two weeks during the timeframe one van was out of commission and did not continue to rent a van nor secure other means of transportation even though Company approval was given. Attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). A review of policy and procedures were: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. On 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. On 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. On 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. On 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. Resident #254 is no longer in the facility as of 04/19/2023 related to transferred to the hospital. On 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. On 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. On 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. On 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM. The facility alleges all corrective actions were completed to remove the immediacy on May 7, 2023, and the Immediate Jeopardy was removed May 8, 2023. The State Agency (SA) validated the facility's Corrective Actions: 1. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a pulmonology scheduled for 06/19/2023 at 4:00 PM. 2. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 75 has a cardiology appointment scheduled for 05/23/2023 at 1:00 PM. 3. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review Resident # 87 had a vascular stent removed on 05/04/2023 at 5:30 AM. 4. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 2:00 PM, Ad Hoc Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee met and covered needed medical services to prevent future occurrences of neglect, Comprehensive Care Plans, residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications, facility administration and review of an effective QAPI program is maintained. The SA determined a Root Cause Analysis (RCA) was conducted and policies and procedures were reviewed for changes. The SA determined attendees were the Medical Director (MD), Executive Director (ED), Director of Nursing (DON), Infection Control Preventionist (ICP), Business Office Manager (BOM), Maintenance Director, Regional Director of Clinical Services 1 (RDCS 1), Regional [NAME] President of Operations (RVPO), Regional Director of Business Office Services (RDBOS), Regional Director of Clinical Services 2 (RDCS 2), Business Development Coordinator, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), Physical Therapist (PT), Registered Nurse Minimum Data Set Nurse (RN MDS Nurse), Activities Director, Housekeeping Manager, Social Services Director, Dietary Manager, Medical Records Nurse, and Human Resources Director (HRD). The SA determined a review of policy and procedures were performed for: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Transportation, Skin and Wound, Plans of Care, and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) which required no changes. 5. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:30 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the Medical Director and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to ensure an effective QAPI program is maintained to address outside medical services of the residents. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 6. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 3:35 PM, the RVPO conducted a quality review to ensure the facility has a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place. There is a current non-emergent ambulance agreement in place for the facility to ensure that residents with higher level of transfer care needs have non-emergent transportation provided by the facility. 7. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 3:45 PM, the RVPO initiated education to the ED and DON to ensure the administration in a manner that enables the use of its resources to effectively maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for residents to receive physician ordered services to prevent future non-compliance. No new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 8. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:00 PM, the DON initiated education to all staff to ensure the residents receive needed medical services and provide physician ordered services that are necessary. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 9. The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:20 PM,the RDCS initiated education with the RN MDS Nurses to ensure that Comprehensive Care Plans are developed and implemented to prevent further resident complications for residents' treatment related to a vascular implant and orthopedic and vascular appointments. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 10. The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:30 PM, the DON initiated education to licensed nurses to ensure that all residents residing in the facility receive the outside medical services needed to prevent complications. No current staff or new hired staff will work without the aforementioned education. 11. The State Agency (SA) through interviews on 05/05/2023 at 4:40 PM, RDCS 1 and LPN 1 (Licensed Practical Nurse 1) conducted a quality review of physician ordered appointments of current residents. A quality review of residents' physician ordered appointments were reviewed with the MD for medical urgency and transfer to a higher level of care. No residents were identified with medically urgent appointments. 12. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/05/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the MD conducted a physician visit with Residents #75 and #87 to ensure medical stability and no new orders received. 13. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews/record review on 05/07/2023 at 8:00 AM, RDCS 1, RDCS 2, RDCS 3 (Regional Director of Clinical Services 3), and RN Treatment Nurse completed assessments. on current residents to ensure medical stability and not requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. The SA validated no residents at risk were identified. 14. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:00 PM, MD conducted a physician's visit with Residents #75 and #87 and reviewed outstanding appointments for medical urgency and determined that no current appointments were medically urgent, requiring a transfer to a higher level of care. MD gave new orders on Residents #75 and #87. 15. The State Agency (SA) validated through observation/interviews and record review on 05/07/2023 at 4:30 PM, the Regional Plant Operations Director delivered an additional wheelchair accessible van for the facility to maintain effectiveness transportation for physician ordered outside medical services. 16. The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews on 05/07/2023 at 4:45 PM, that the RDCS 1 educated the ED, DON, MR Nurse, and Licensed Social Worker on the process to ensure physician ordered medical services are scheduled and transportation is provided. The MR Nurse will be the designated person to ensure all outside medical appointments are maintained and executed. 17. The State Agency (SA) validated through record review on 05/07/2023 at 6:30 PM, Resident # 87 had an appointment scheduled with a wound specialist on 05/23/2023 at 9:15 AM.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary trea...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received necessary treatment and services to promote the healing of a pressure ulcer and prevent an infection for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for pressure wounds. Resident #254 Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Skin and Wound, with a revision date of 01/24/2022 revealed, Policy: To provide a system for identifying risk, and implementing resident centered interventions to promote skin health, prevention, and healing of pressure injuries. Process: . Skin Impairment Identification: . 4. Refer to Therapy as appropriate. 5. Monitor residents' response to treatment, modify as indicated . On 05/03/23 at 10:10 AM, during an interview with the Wound Care Nurse/Registered Nurse (RN) #1, she explained Resident #254 was sent to the hospital from the wound care appointment on 04/19/2023 and remains in the hospital. She revealed she had referred Resident #254 to the local hospital wound clinic, due to a large infected sacral wound. She stated Resident #254 had previously been scheduled for a wound care appointment on the 14th of April, but due to lack of transportation, the appointment was rescheduled for 04/19/2023. On 05/04/23 at 08:50 AM, during a telephone interview with Resident #254's Resident Representative (RR), he explained since admission to the facility, the resident has been hospitalized several times for wound infections. The RR revealed the resident's wounds would improve during the hospitalization, however, when she returned to the facility, the wounds would always get worse. On 05/04/23 at 09:10 AM, during a telephone interview with Resident #254's niece, she explained the resident is in the hospital and the wounds are being treated. The niece complained the facility has not been taking good care of the resident and that she had even taken pictures of the resident's wound dressings, showing that they had not been changed in a couple of days. The niece revealed that as the resident's wounds continued to worsen, she had tried to talk to the Director of Nurses (DON), wound care nurse, and the floor nurse about her concerns, no one would talk to her, and everyone blamed each other. On 05/04/2023 at 10:15 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she confirmed Resident #254 did acquire wounds in the facility and that the wounds continued to deteriorate. She confirmed Resident #254 was transported to the wound care clinic via ambulance on 04/19/2023. On 05/04/23 at 10:50 AM, during an interview with RN #1/Wound Care Nurse, she confirmed Resident #254 missed her first wound care clinic appointment on 04/14/2023 due to facility transportation problems of not having a van to take the resident. She confirmed Resident #254's wound on her sacrum started out very small but has now progressed to a large wound, with large amounts of drainage, and wound stayed infected. She confirmed Resident #254 had asked to go to the hospital on [DATE] but was not sent until 04/19/2023 for a wound care clinic appointment. On 05/05/23 at 01:45 PM, during an interview with the DON, she explained the facility has no records of the resident's visit to the (Proper Name Wound Care Clinic) because when she phoned the clinic, she was informed the clinic has no documentation on the visit, as upon arrival to the clinic, the patient was lethargic and when vitals were taken, the resident went straight to the Emergency Room. On 05/08/23 at 11:10 AM, during a telephone interview with the local wound care clinic, the clinic staff explained when Resident #254 arrived for the wound appointment, her vital signs were taken, and the resident was immediately sent to the Hospital Emergency Room, as the resident had an elevated temperature and was lethargic. Record review of Resident #254's admission Record revealed the facility initially admitted the resident on 03/22/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of End Stage Heart Failure, Schizophrenia, Unspecified, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications. Record review of Resident #254 Order Summary Report dated 05/03/2023 revealed, orders for . consult (Proper Name Wound Care) for worsening of Stage 4 to sacrum with order date 04/10/2023 and an order dated 04/14/2023 revealed, wound care clinic apt (appointment) rescheduled to 04/19/2023 at 08:30 AM . A record review of Resident #254's Progress Notes *NEW* dated 05/05/2023 revealed on 04/14/2023 at 01:53 PM . unable to take resident to wound care apt (appointment) today will contact family and wound care to reschedule . with author RN#1. A note dated 04/14/2023 at 06:40 PM revealed . nurse . educated the resident on the importance of allowing the facility to take care of her wounds and start her on antibiotics . resident refused stating she doesn't trust anyone here she wants the hospital to give her the antibiotics . Progress note dated 04/19/2023 at 09:30 AM revealed . Res (resident) transferred to hosp (hospital) per Proper Name (ambulance) via stretcher at this time for wound care appt (appointment) . A record review of Resident #254's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/10/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Section M revealed Resident #254 had two (2) Stage 2, one (1) Stage 4, and two (2) Unstageable pressure wounds. A record review of Resident #254's Pressure Ulcer Wound Rounds dated 04/07/2023 and 04/13/2023 revealed effective date 04/07/2023 at 12:12 PM sacrum pressure wound had measurements 15.6 centimeters (cm) length x width 12.9 cm x depth 3.9 cm Stage IV had wound bed with slough that was yellow in color with a large amount of yellow purulent drainage with odor. Assessment with effective date 04/13/2023 at 01:18 PM revealed sacrum pressure wound had measurements of 18.0 cm x 16.6 cm and 0.5 cm Stage IV and continued to have a wound bed with yellow slough in color with a large amount of yellow purulent drainage with odor. By comparison, of the last two (2) assessments of the Stage IV sacrum revealed the wound had continued to increase in size. A record review of Resident #254's hospital records dated 04/19/2023, with a chief complaint of Decubitus ulcer revealed .The patient is a nursing home resident. She went to wound care and she was found to be tachycardic (high heart rate) and febrile (had a fever). Patient was sent to ER (emergency room). The patient is complaining of pain in her wounds . In the ER, the patient was hypotensive (had low blood pressure), tachycardia, and tachypneic (breathing fast). Her work-up cell count was 24,000. She was admitted . A: Sepsis secondary to multiple decubitus ulcers . P. Unstageable sacral decubitus ulcer 20 x 30 centimeters in area. Wound culture of her sacral decubitus ulcer is ordered. Cultures are taken x2. General surgery is consulted for debridement .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing for three ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing for three (3) of 24 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Resident #31, Resident #71, and Resident #254. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Activities of Daily Living, dated 01/01/2022, revealed, Policy: To encourage resident choice and participation in activities of daily living (ADL) and provide .assistance as necessary. ADLs include bathing .Procedure: 1. CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) will review the resident [NAME] for information on individual care needs and preferences . Resident #31 On 05/05/23 at 09:00 AM, during an interview with Resident #31, he stated, I have not had a shower since I was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He explained that the facility provided perineal care when he needed it, but it was not a complete bed bath. He reported that he had asked for a bed bath, even though he should not have had to do so. He further explained that prior to his admission to the facility, he was homeless, and he had gotten more baths on the street than he had at the facility. On 05/05/23 at 09:20 AM, in an interview with CNA #3 regarding Resident #31, she stated the facility did not have a bath schedule, so she made her own schedule. She stated that residents should get a bed bath daily and she thought residents would feel awful if they did not. On 05/05/23 at 9:50 AM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3, she stated that Resident #31 was not able to get up for showers and he required a bed bath only. She explained that residents who were only able to get a bed bath should get a head-to-toe bath daily. A record review of the admission Record revealed Resident #31 was admitted by the facility on 01/31/2023 with a diagnosis of Displaced Supracondylar Fracture. A record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/07/2023 revealed Resident #31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. A review of Section G revealed he was dependent upon staff for bathing. A record review of the Documentation Survey Report for April 2023, with an Intervention/Task of ADL-Bathing . revealed Resident #31 received a bed bath on 04/07/2023, 04/08/2023 on day and evening shift, 04/10/2023, 04/17/2023, 04/18/2023 on day and evening shift, 04/19/2023 on day and evening shift, 04/21/2023 on day and evening shift, 04/29/2023, and 04/30/2023, which indicated that he did not receive a bed bath daily. Resident #71 On 05/08/23 at 11:15 AM, during an interview with Resident #71, he stated that he wanted a shower because it had been a few days since he had been to the shower. He said he wanted to have his showers performed regularly and because it had been too many days since his last shower, he would wash himself off in the sink. On 05/08/23 at 11:30 AM, during an interview with CNA #5, she reviewed the [NAME] and explained Resident #71 was scheduled for a shower on the 3-11 shift, which was not the scheduled shift in which she worked. On 05/08/23 at 02:30 PM, during an interview with CNA #6, she explained the facility previously had a shower list, but now the staff followed the resident's [NAME] to determine the shower days. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #71 on 04/30/21 with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis. A record review of the Annual MDS with an ARD of 04/17/2023 revealed Resident #71 had a BIMS score of 14, which indicated he was cognitively intact. A review of Section G revealed that personal hygiene activity occurred only once or twice during the seven (7) day lookback period. A record review of the Documentation Survey Report for April 2023, with an Intervention/Task of ADL-Bathing . revealed Resident #71 had one (1) bath on 04/18/2023 for the month of April. Resident #254 On 05/04/23 at 08:50 AM, during a phone interview with Resident #254's Resident Representative (RR), he explained that the resident was currently in the hospital and had been in the hospital since 04/18/2023. He stated the resident had complained to him that she did not get baths or showers. On 05/04/23 at 09:10 AM, during a phone interview with Resident #254's niece, she complained the facility had not been providing baths for the resident. She had asked the facility to call her and let her know of any refusals, and she would talk to her aunt. She stated that her aunt had told her that she went days without a bath or shower, and she (the niece) had observed the resident wearing the same clothes for days at a time. On 05/04/23 at 10:00 AM, during an interview with CNA #7, she reported that Resident #254 had never refused a bath. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #254 on 03/22/2021 and readmitted her on 04/14/2022 with diagnoses including End Stage Heart Failure, Schizophrenia, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications. A record review of the Annual MDS with an ARD of 04/10/2023 revealed Resident #254 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of Section G revealed she was totally dependent on staff for bathing. A record review of the Documentation Survey Report for April 2023, with an Intervention/Task of ADL-Bathing . revealed there was no documentation that Resident #254 received a bath on 04/07/2023, 04/08/2023, 04/09/2023, 04/13/2023, 04/14/2023, 04/15/2023, 04/16/2023, and 04/17/2023. On 05/03/23 at 03:05 PM, during an interview with CNA #9, she explained the bath schedules for the residents were located on the [NAME] Task. She said the facility did not have a separate bath or shower schedule and CNA #9 commented that she tries to give all her residents a bed bath daily. On 05/08/23 at 11:53 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) she explained that a bed bath consisted of a head-to-toe bath and that bed baths should be completed every day. She further explained that the nurses should follow up to ensure that the baths are completed. On 05/08/23 at 02:00 PM, during an interview with the DON, she presented a handwritten bath schedule, revised 1/10/23, and stated the facility staff used the schedule to perform showers and bathing, but was unsure if the CNAs followed schedule or if they solely used the [NAME] to perform baths. She explained that when a resident refused a shower, the staff would try and talk to the resident, and would document the refusal in the Tasks on the Kiosk. She stated that she expected all staff to follow the resident's bath schedule and for residents to receive baths.
Oct 2019 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (1) of 28 resident records reviewed, Residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (1) of 28 resident records reviewed, Resident #122. Findings Include: Review of the facility's Policies and Procedure policy, revised 9/25/17, revealed to maintain all resident assessments completed within the previous 15 months in the resident's active clinical record, or in a centralized location that is easily and readily accessible. Each person completing a section or portion of MDS signs the Attestation Statement indicating accuracy/completeness. Review of the Discharge MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/20/19, revealed acute hospital was documented as the discharge destination for Resident #122. On 10/23/19 at 4:23 PM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 revealed Resident #122 was admitted for rehabilitation. She stated the resident was never hospitalized during her stay at the facility. Record review of a physician's order, dated 09/20/19, revealed Resident #122 was discharged from the facility with all nursing home medications, except narcotics. Resident #122 left the facility in a personal vehicle with his/her spouse. On 10/24/19 at 11:06 AM, an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, MDS/Care Plan Nurse, revealed Resident #122's discharge MDS was coded inaccurately for the discharge destination. On 10/24/19 at 11:50 AM, an interview with LPN #6/MDS Nurse revealed the code for Resident #122's discharge status was entered incorrectly for the discharge MDS; should have been to the community, not the hospital.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Level II Preassessment Sc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Level II Preassessment Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), for a resident with mental illness diagnoses, for one (1) of 28 records reviewed, Resident #53. Findings include: A review of the provider manual (name of State provider for Preadmission Screenings) revealed Level II evaluations are mandated regardless of whether or not an individual is a recipient of Medicaid benefits. The Medicaid certification of the nursing facility, not the payment method of the individual, determines whether Level II evaluation is required. The Level II evaluation must occur prior to admission and whenever a resident experience a significant change in status. A review of the Pre-admission Screening (PAS), dated 5/20/19, revealed Resident #53 did not have a diagnosis of a major mental illness. A level II screen was not in the medical record. Review of the original admission face sheet, revealed Resident #53 was admitted [DATE], with a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder. Review of the physician's orders, dated 5/24/2019, revealed the resident had diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder, Dementia, and Depression. A review of the Diagnosis Report revealed Resident #53 had diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder, Dementia with behavior, and other mixed anxiety disorders present upon admission. On 10/22/19 at 3:07 PM, an interview with the Administrator revealed Resident #53 did not have any major mental illness upon admission. She stated the resident was diagnosed with major mental illnesses after admission. On 10/23/2019 at 3:35 PM, interview with the Social Worker/MDS Coordinator stated she believed Resident #53 would be exempted, due to Dementia. She also stated that the resident did not need a level II done; then stated a level II was submitted on 05/23/2019. On 10/23/2019 at 3:40 PM, an interview with the Social Worker/MDS Coordinator revealed they use (name of company) guidelines in reference to when a level II should be submitted. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Data (ARD) of 5/31/2019, revealed documentation of Schizophrenia, Depression, and Anxiety Disorder diagnoses. On 10/23/19 at 3:45 PM, an interview with Registered Nurse #1 (RN)/MDS Nurse stated when MDS submission errors occur, it is corrected and resubmitted.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement the Comprehensive Care Plan related to Catheter Care, for one (1) of five (5) care pl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement the Comprehensive Care Plan related to Catheter Care, for one (1) of five (5) care plans reviewed, Resident #15. Findings Include: A review of the facility's Plans of Care policy, revised 9/25/17, revealed the procedure is to develop a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Resident #15 Review of Resident #15's Comprehensive Care Plan, with a focus of Elimination, implemented 3/18/19, with a target date of 11/15/19, revealed Resident #15 with altered bladder elimination and an intervention to perform catheter care, as ordered, per Nursing Aide. An observation on 10/21/19 at 10:45 AM, revealed Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #1, assisted by CNA #2, performed catheter care on Resident #15. CNA #1 gloved and held the tubing approximately 12 inches up the tubing and away from the meatus. CNA #1, holding the tubing away from the meatus, wiped upwards, away from the body, with a soapy cloth and repeated this procedure while rinsing and drying the tubing. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 01:38 PM, CNA #1 stated the correct procedure would be to hold the catheter at the meatus when cleaning the tubing. CNA #1 stated that she couldn't remember how she held the tubing, but she thought she held it at the meatus, however, she was nervous. CNA #1 stated that she should have known how to do catheter care correctly. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 1:43 PM, CNA #2 revealed that she observed CNA #1 perform improper catheter care, by holding the catheter tubing away from the meatus, as she wiped up on the tubing. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 2:07 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated CNA #1 should have held the catheter tubing at the meatus and not up the tubing. The DON stated that her holding the tubing away from the meatus could have caused trauma to the meatus as she wiped upward on the tubing. The DON stated CNA #1 didn't follow the care plan as related to proper catheter care. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 3:01 PM ,Registered Nurse (RN) #1 stated she expected problems, goals and interventions to be carried out by the staff from the Comprehensive Care plan. She stated that CNA #1 did not follow the Care Plan for catheter care if she did not complete the care correctly.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during catheter care as evidence by incorrect cleaning technique of...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent cross contamination during catheter care as evidence by incorrect cleaning technique of the catheter tubing for one (1) of five (5) catheter care observations, Resident #15. Findings Include: A review of facility policy titled Catheter care, Urinary revised 9/5/17, revealed the procedure for catheter care was to clean the catheter tubing with soap and water, starting close to the urinary meatus, cleaning in a circular motion along its length for about four (4) inches, moving away from the body. Rinse well using the same motion. Resident #15 An observation on 10/21/19 at 10:45 AM, revealed Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #1, assisted by CNA #2, entered the room to perform catheter care on Resident #15. CNA #1 gloved and held the tubing approximately 12 inches up the tubing and away from the meatus. CNA #1, holding the tubing away from the meatus, wiped upwards away from the body with a soapy cloth and repeated this procedure while rinsing and drying the tubing. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 1:38 PM, CNA #1 stated she was supposed to hold the catheter at the meatus when cleaning the tubing. CNA #1 stated that she couldn't remember how she held the tubing, but she thought that she held it at the meatus, however, she was nervous. CNA #1 stated she should know how to do catheter care correctly. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 1:43 PM, CNA #2 confirmed CNA #1 performed improper catheter care. CNA #2 stated she saw CNA #1 hold the catheter tubing away from the meatus as she wiped up on the tubing. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 2:07 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated CNA #1 should have held the catheter tubing at the meatus, not up the tubing. The DON stated holding the tubing away from the meatus could have caused trauma to the meatus as the CNA wiped upward on the tubing.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

MS #16272 Based on staff interview, record review, facility policy, and resident interview, the facility failed to obtain and provide Resident #61's pain medication in a timely manner for one (1) of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
MS #16272 Based on staff interview, record review, facility policy, and resident interview, the facility failed to obtain and provide Resident #61's pain medication in a timely manner for one (1) of four (4) residents reviewed for pain. Resident #61 did not have Norco available for pain, as ordered by the physician, for nine (9) scheduled doses. Findings Include: A review of the facility's, LTC Receiving Pharmacy Products and Services from Pharmacy, revised 10/31/16, revealed new orders for Schedule II controlled substances required a written prescription prior to dispensing, unless there is an emergency situation. An emergency situation is one in which the prescribing Practioner determines that immediate administration of the Schedule II controlled substance is necessary for proper treatment of the intended ultimate user. If the medication is needed before the next scheduled delivery, facility staff should indicate the exact time by which the medication is needed. Review of the Physician's Orders, for Resident #61, revealed Norco 10-325 milligram (mg) one (1) tab every eight (8) hours for pain. Record review of Resident #61's Controlled Narcotic Log for Norco 10-325 mg revealed the Norco 10-325 mg was last signed out 9/22/19 at 10:00 PM. The Log also shows Norco 10-325 mg #30 signed in for Resident #61 on 9/25/19, with the first dose signed out on 9/26/19 at 6:00 AM. This indicated the resident didn't receive Norco on 9/23/24 for three (3) doses, 9/24/19 for three (3) doses, and 9/25/19 for three (3) doses. (Total of nine (9) doses). Record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #61 revealed no documentation for Norco 10-325 milligram (mg) on 9/23/19 at 2:00 PM and 10:00 PM; 9/24/19 at 6:00 AM, 2:00 PM, and 10:00 PM; and 9/25/19 at 6:00 AM. During an interview on 10/21/19 at 11:25 AM, Resident #61 stated she ran out of her pain medication for about three (3) days. She stated the nurses told her the pharmacy needed a signed script for the medication, so they had to wait to get a doctor to sign a new script. She stated she was upset because she was hurting so bad. Resident #61 stated since the issue was cleared up, she hasn't had any problems with getting the pain medication and she's okay. During a telephone interview on 10/21/19 at 3:23 PM, a Pharmacy Representative stated that the pharmacy's records revealed that Resident #61's Norco 10-325 mg #90 was delivered to the facility on 8/19/19, and on 9/25/19 #45 was delivered to the facility. Review of a delivery receipt revealed Norco 10-325 mg was delivered to the facility for Resident #61 on 8/19/19, and 9/25/19. During a phone interview on 10/21/19 at 5:08 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 stated Resident #61 did go without her pain medication for one (1) - two (2) days. She stated that it was on her weekend to work and she gave the 10:00 PM dose on Sunday night 9/22/19, but there were none for Monday morning. LPN #2 stated that she returned to work on Wednesday 9/25/19, and Resident #61 still did not have any Norco, so she obtained a hard script from the facility's Physician's Assistant (PA) for the Norco. LPN #2 stated that when she spoke to the PA to obtain the new prescription, he stated that nobody had called him over the weekend for a hard script or for a substitute. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 8:58 AM, the Physician's Assistant revealed that he was never made aware of Resident #61 being without her Norco at any time. During a phone interview on 10/22/19 at 10:00 AM, LPN #3 revealed Resident #61 did not have Norco in the building for her shift on 9/23/19 for the 10:00 PM, 9/24/19 - 6:00 AM, 9/24/19 - 10:00 PM, and 9/25/19 - 6:00 AM doses. LPN #3 stated she reported not having the medication to Registered Nurse (RN) #2 the first night, and then RN #3 the second night. LPN #3 stated to her understanding they do have an E-kit, but they have to contact the pharmacist and the pharmacist has to contact the physician to be able to get into the box. LPN #3 stated that RN #2 tried to call the Physician's Assistant, without an answer. LPN #3 stated after she reported it the first night, she thought the Norco would come in with the medication order around 11:00 PM, but it didn't, and when she returned to work the next day, she thought it would be there, but it wasn't, so that's when she reported to RN #3. She stated she also reported it the next morning to the oncoming nurse. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 10:12 AM, LPN #1 stated she didn't remember if the medication (Norco) was in the building or not. She stated if she would have noticed the medication was not there, she would have called the pharmacy to see if Resident #61 had any on backup that could have been sent. She further stated if the medication was a narcotic, she would call the doctor for a hard script and get the medication into the facility. LPN #1 stated she worked 9/23/19 and 9/24/19, and she just didn't remember calling the pharmacy or the doctor to get a script. She stated she didn't remember the resident complaining about not getting pain medication. LPN #1 stated they have an E-kit and a code was needed to call the doctor and the pharmacist. LPN #1 stated they have an after-hour backup pharmacy, (name) and they will come out at night. LPN #1 stated she gave the resident Tylenol on 9/23/19 at 4:45 PM, 9/24/19 at 8:45 AM, and 9/24/19 at 6:15 PM. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 10:20 AM, RN #2 revealed she remembered on 9/24 or 9/25, that Resident #61 did not have her pain medication. RN #2 stated Resident #61 called her to come to her room and the resident reported she didn't have her pain medication. RN #2 stated she called the Medical Director and left him a message and even called him two (2) or three (3) times with no answer from him. She stated she even called his house phone. RN #2 stated that she didn't know the process of getting into the E-kit, but she just usually called the physician with what she needed. RN #2 stated they offered Resident #61 some Tylenol and she refused it. RN #2 stated if it had been reported to her earlier in the day, she would have gotten a script, because the PA was in the building earlier that day. RN #2 stated she remembered the PA came into the building on 9/25/19, and LPN #2 got a hard copy from him and got Resident #61's Norco. RN #2 stated that she knew Resident #61 well and she needed her pain medication. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 10:44 AM, RN #3 stated all she could remember was that Resident #61 didn't have her medication on 9/23/19, and she reported it to the morning nurses on 9/24/19. She stated Resident #61 was complaining that she needed her pain medication. RN #3 stated they offered her Tylenol and she refused at first, but then took it. RN #3 stated she called the Medical Director, who is Resident #61's physician, on 9/24/19, and left a message that Resident #61 needed a hard script sent to pharmacy for her pain medication, that she was out, and the physician texted back the word ok. RN #3 stated that she didn't work 9/24/19 or 9/25/19, but came back on 9/26/19, and Resident #61 had her medication at that point. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 1:20 PM, the Administrator revealed getting the medication for Resident #61 just fell through the crack. The Administrator stated the nurses did not follow through with the process to obtain Resident #61's pain medication in a timely manner, but she was glad they gave her something until it was obtained. During an interview on 10/22/19 at 3:14 PM, the Medical Director revealed he did not have a memory regarding Resident #61 running out of pain medication. The Medical Director stated the nurses should have been persistent in contacting someone to get a hard script, or to get a substitute pain medication, until they received the Norco in the facility. The Medical Director stated, I think Resident #61 receiving Neurontin and Tylenol is what helped her maintain a decent pain level without the Norco. The Medical Director stated he thought there was a way the nurses could call the pharmacy and get an emergency supply of medication, but he wasn't sure what the facility's process was.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have lids sealed on the Biohazard Trash Cans for Seven (7) of seven (7) trash cans in the Biohazard Room, wher...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have lids sealed on the Biohazard Trash Cans for Seven (7) of seven (7) trash cans in the Biohazard Room, where staff placed medical waste. Findings include: According to the Policy and Procedure Storage of Biohazardous Waste, revised 9/1/17, revealed: Policy: Biohazardous waste should be stored in a manner that is safe, effective and in compliance of all facility, local, state and federal laws, rules and regulations. Policy Statement: Medical waste will be handled and disposed of safely and in accordance with regulator requirements. Disposable items contaminated with excretions or secretions from residents believed to be infectious must be placed in plastic bags and sealed, and either decontaminated with bleach/EPA registered germicidal or stored in appropriate container until removal from the premises. On 10/23/2019 at 4:22 PM, observation revealed there were no lids on the seven (7) Biohazard trash cans in the Biohazard Room. On 10/23/2019 at 4:22 PM, an interview with the Maintenance Person revealed trash can lids should be placed on the biohazard trash cans. The Maintenance person stated the (company) picks up the biohazard waste weekly. On 10/24/2019 at 8:00 AM, an interview with the Administrator revealed the trash can lids should be placed on the biohazard trash cans; if there is trash in them. The Administrator was referred to the regulation, when asked since the room is only for Biohazard material, does the trash cans need the lids placed on them.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Smoking Policies (Tag F0926)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview, observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe smoking environment as evidenced by plastic trash cans and plastic bags were used in t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, observation, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe smoking environment as evidenced by plastic trash cans and plastic bags were used in the smoking area for cigarette butt disposal, for three (3) of four (4) observations during survey. Findings include: A review of the Smoking Policy, dated, revealed: The Center will provide a safe, designated smoking area for residents. Smoking is only allowed in designated areas and oxygen is not permitted. The Center will have safety equipment available in designated smoking areas including: smoking blankets, smoking aprons, a fire extinguisher and non combustible self-closing ashtrays. Procedure: 7. Metal containers with self-closing cover devices, into which ashtrays can be emptied, shall be readily available to all areas where smoking is permitted. On 10/21/19 at 11:17 AM, an observation in the smoking area revealed a plastic trash container and plastic trash bag, with cigarette butts noted in the plastic container. On 10/23/19 at 2:57 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #42, whom reported he is aware of the designated smoking areas, staff is available while smoking, and he does not keep his own cigarettes, the staff hold onto their cigarettes. On 10/23/19 at 3:12 PM, an observation in the smoking area revealed a plastic trash container/plastic trash bag, with cigarette butts noted in trash container. On 10/23/19 at 3:57 PM, an interview with Housekeeping Staff #1, revealed Housekeeping cleaned the smoking area two (2) times a day and emptied the trash bags. On 10/24/19 at 9:47 AM, an interview and observation, with the Administrator, revealed the trash container in the smoking area, with plastic bags, and cigarette butts. The Administrator stated there should be no plastic bags in the smoking section.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 42% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 8 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $154,888 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 30 deficiencies on record, including 8 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $154,888 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Mississippi. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 8 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Courtyard's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Courtyard Staffed?

CMS rates COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Courtyard?

State health inspectors documented 30 deficiencies at COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION during 2019 to 2025. These included: 8 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 21 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Courtyard?

COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CONSULATE HEALTH CARE/INDEPENDENCE LIVING CENTERS/NSPIRE HEALTHCARE/RAYDIANT HEALTH CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 145 certified beds and approximately 119 residents (about 82% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MCCOMB, Mississippi.

How Does Courtyard Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Courtyard?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Courtyard Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 8 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Courtyard Stick Around?

COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Courtyard Ever Fined?

COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION has been fined $154,888 across 2 penalty actions. This is 4.5x the Mississippi average of $34,628. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Courtyard on Any Federal Watch List?

COURTYARD HEALTH AND REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.