LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Lawrence County Nursing Center in Monticello, Mississippi has a Trust Grade of F, indicating a poor overall rating with significant concerns about resident care. They rank #171 out of 200 facilities in the state, placing them in the bottom half, though they are the only nursing home in Lawrence County. The facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 4 in 2024 to 11 in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength, rated 4 out of 5 stars, and has a turnover rate of 39%, which is better than the state average. However, there are concerning incidents, such as failing to accurately assess a resident's pain and not managing it effectively, which is critical for comfort, as well as issues with staffing data reporting that may affect care quality.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Mississippi
- #171/200
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 39% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $16,720 in fines. Lower than most Mississippi facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 25 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Mississippi. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (39%)
9 points below Mississippi average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Mississippi average (2.6)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions during wound care for two (2) of (2) wound care observations (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow infection prevention and control practices by placing wound care supplies on an undisinfected ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide wound care in accordance with professional standards of practice and physician's orders, spec...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2025
8 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to review and revise the resident's pain to reflect actual pain instead of at risk for pain for one (...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to manage the resident's pain to the extent possible in accordance with professional standards and th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper handling of personal belon...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow the comprehensive care plan for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (5%) for three (3) of four (4) medication ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0865
(Tag F0865)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interviews, record reviews, facility policy review and Plan of Correction (POC) review, the facility failed to sustain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control guidel...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews, facility statement review and Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) data review, the provider failed to ensure their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ)-which includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the Resident and/or the Resident's Representative with written notification for the reason the resident wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were consistently implemented to prevent the development and/or tr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to remove expired foods from the dry food storage area for one (1) of four (4) kitchen observations. This has a potentia...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews, record review and Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (Casper) reporting data review, the facility failed to ensure payroll-based journal (PBJ) direct care staffing...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) related to a restraint for one (1) of 12 sampled residents. Resident #31
A...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed with measurable objectives and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 39% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 17 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $16,720 in fines. Above average for Mississippi. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Lawrence Co Nursing Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Lawrence Co Nursing Center Staffed?
CMS rates LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Lawrence Co Nursing Center?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 15 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Lawrence Co Nursing Center?
LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE BEEBE FAMILY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 53 residents (about 88% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MONTICELLO, Mississippi.
How Does Lawrence Co Nursing Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lawrence Co Nursing Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Lawrence Co Nursing Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Lawrence Co Nursing Center Stick Around?
LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Lawrence Co Nursing Center Ever Fined?
LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER has been fined $16,720 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,246. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Lawrence Co Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?
LAWRENCE CO NURSING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.