BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON

1009 SOUTH MAIN STREET, NEWTON, MS 39345 (601) 683-6601
For profit - Limited Liability company 60 Beds BEDFORD CARE CENTERS Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
49/100
#2 of 200 in MS
Last Inspection: May 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Bedford Care Center of Newton has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerns about resident safety and care. It ranks #2 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi, placing it in the top half of state options, and #1 of 2 in Newton County, meaning there is only one other local facility to consider. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, as issues increased from 3 in 2022 to 5 in 2024, and it has a troubling history with critical incidents, including failing to investigate and report possible sexual abuse involving a cognitively impaired resident. On a positive note, staffing is a strength, with a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of only 36%, which is lower than the state average. However, the RN coverage is average, and the facility has no fines on record, which is a good sign. Families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses carefully when considering this nursing home for their loved ones.

Trust Score
D
49/100
In Mississippi
#2/200
Top 1%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
3 → 5 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
36% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Mississippi facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 31 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Mississippi. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 3 issues
2024: 5 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (36%)

    12 points below Mississippi average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 36%

10pts below Mississippi avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: BEDFORD CARE CENTERS

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
May 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive, specifically a durable Power of Attorney (POA), was available and readily retri...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive, specifically a durable Power of Attorney (POA), was available and readily retrievable by facility staff for one (1) of 24 residents reviewed for advance directives. (Resident #29). Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advanced Directives, revised 11/1/22, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to .formulate an advance directive. Definitions: Advance Directive is a written instruction, such as a . durable power of attorney for health care .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. Upon admission, should the resident have an advance directive, copies will be made and placed on the chart . A record review of the Clinical Resident Profile revealed the facility admitted Resident #29 on 5/2/2018 and she had current diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease with Early Onset. Record review of the facility's document, Acknowledgement of Advance Directives Decisions, Rights, and Information, signed 5/1/2018, indicated Resident #29 had a POA. A record review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed there was no copy of a POA on the chart. On 5/28/24 at 1:57 PM, in an interview and record review with Registered Nurse (RN) #1/RN Supervisor, she explained if a resident had a POA, it would be scanned into the Misc tab of the EMR. RN #1 reviewed the EMR for Resident #29 and determined there was no POA in the chart. She confirmed there was no paper charts or any other area at the nurses station where a POA would be kept. RN #1 stated that Medical Records was responsible for scanning POAs into the EMR. On 5/28/24 at 2:00 PM, in an interview and record review with the Medical Records, she confirmed she was responsible for scanning in advance directives and POAs into the EMR. Upon review, she determined the POA was not in the EMR for Resident #29. She commented Resident #29 had lived at the facility for a long time and if the POA had not been scanned in, then it could be located either in the old medical records office or in the front office, which was locked after hours and on weekends. She confirmed the POA was not readily accessible to staff and stated, It just did not get scanned in. On 5/28/24 at 2:15 PM, Medical Records provided a copy of the POA for Resident #29 and stated it was found in the front office. On 5/29/24 at 4:05 PM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she stated she was unaware Resident #29's POA was not readily accessible for review by facility staff and she expected all POAs to be scanned into the residents' EMR.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from the use of physical restraints, as evidenced by, an observation of a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from the use of physical restraints, as evidenced by, an observation of a resident wearing a seat belt with no facility documentation of risk and benefits, physician order, consent, monitoring, assessments or medical symptoms for restraint use for one (1) of 15 sampled residents. (Resident #17) Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Physical Restraint Application, revised 8/2/22, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide safety or postural support of a resident to prevent injury to the resident or others when the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of restraints .Physical restraints are defined .as any manual method or physical or mechanical devise, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement .The resident must be physically and cognitively able to self-release devices such as .seat belts .If a resident cannot mentally and physically self-release, then the device is considered a restraint . On 05/28/24 at 11:40 AM, during an observation, Resident #17 was sitting in a wheelchair and had a seat belt that was attached to the chair and buckled in the front. His hands were contracted. He kept his hands positioned around his abdominal area. On 05/29/24 at 2:26 PM, in an observation an interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, she stated Resident #17 was unable to use his hands and could not release the seat belt buckle without assistance. Resident #17 was sitting in his wheelchair with the seat belt device in place. CNA #1 asked Resident #17 to unbuckle his seat belt, but he said that he could not unbuckle it and asked the CNA to do it. Review of the medical record revealed there was no documentation Resident #17 had a wheelchair seat belt restraint, consent, risk and benefits of restraint use, restraint assessment, physician order, medical symptom for use or monitoring for the seat belt. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #17 on 6/18/2022 and he had current diagnoses including Acquired Absence of Right Leg and Left Leg, Above the Knee. Record review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/4/24 revealed Resident #17 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated he was cognitively intact. On 05/30/24 at 11:06 AM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) she stated the facility did not consider the lap belt for Resident #17 as a restraint because they viewed it as a support device for the resident. She confirmed that by definition, it should have been considered a restraint and the facility should have obtained a physician's order for the device.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to a seat belt restraint for one (1) of 15 care plans revie...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to a seat belt restraint for one (1) of 15 care plans reviewed. Residents #17 Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Comprehensive Care Plans revised 8/24/22, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychological needs .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .3. The comprehensive care plan will describe .a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . During an observation and interview on 05/29/24 at 2:26 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 stated Resident #17 was unable to use his hands and could not release the seat belt buckle without assistance. Resident #17 was sitting in his wheelchair with the seat belt device in place. CNA #1 asked Resident #17 to unbuckle his seat belt, but he said that he could not unbuckle it and asked the CNA to do it. A record review of the Comprehensive Care Plan revealed there was no care plan developed related to the seat belt device worn by Resident #17. During an interview, on 05/30/24 at 11:06 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON) she stated the facility did not consider the lap belt for Resident #17 as a restraint but rather it was viewed as a support device for the resident. However, it should have been considered a restraint and a care plan should have been developed for the device. On 5/30/24 at 11:26 AM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, she reviewed the comprehensive care plan for Resident #17 and confirmed there was no care plan related to the use of the seatbelt. She confirmed the facility should have developed a care plan for the device and stated she was not sure why it was not developed. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #17 on 6/18/2022 and he had current diagnoses including Acquired Absence of Right Leg and Left Leg, Above the Knee.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to discard expired medications from one (1) of three (3) medication storage rooms observed. (Central Station) Fin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to discard expired medications from one (1) of three (3) medication storage rooms observed. (Central Station) Findings include: Record Review of the facility's Medication Storage, revised 07/17/23, revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the .medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .8. Unused Medications: The .medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued .medication with worn. In an observation and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #2, on 5/28/24 at 11:33 AM, on central station there were expired medications in a cubicle in the medication room stored in blister packs (dose packaging for pharmaceutical tablets or capsules) for Resident #36. The medications included Furosemide 40 milligrams (mg) that expired on 1/2/24, Vistaril 25 mg expired on 1/2/24, Aricept 20 mg expired on 10/28/23, and Zoloft 25 mg expired on 2/27/24. RN #2 explained that all nurses should check the medication rooms and medication carts to ensure there were no expired medications. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/30/24 at 11:39 AM, she stated it was her expectation that the nurses check medications for expiration dates before administering them and to remove expired medications from the medication carts and medication rooms.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0564 (Tag F0564)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice to receive visi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice to receive visitors, as evidenced by, restricting visitation privileges in the dining room (a common area of the facility) with no reasonable clinical or safety explanation for one (1) of 15 sampled residents, with the potential to affect all residents who are served meals in the dining room. Resident #47 Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Resident Right to Access and Visitation, revised 10/1/2022, revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate the resident's right to receive visitors of their choosing, at the time of their choosing .Visitation will be person-centered, consider the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, and support their quality of life .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines . 2 .Resident's family member are not subject to visiting hour limitation or other restrictions not imposed by the resident, with the exception of reasonable clinical and safety restrictions .11. The facility will ensure all visitors enjoy full and equal visitation privileges, consistent with resident preferences . During an interview on 5/28/2024 at 10:30 AM, Resident #47's family member explained the facility would not allow her to visit the resident in the dining room. She stated she had been informed by the facility she could visit the resident in the resident's room or the family room, but not in the dining room. She said that not being able to eat with her family in the dining room was concerning and she had communicated with the Social Services Coordinator (SSC) but was told the only visitation options were the resident's room and the family room. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 10:54 AM, with the SSC, she confirmed that no one was allowed to visit residents in the dining room since the COVID-19 public health emergency. The facility continued to try to maintain distance between residents to reduce the spread of COVID-19. During an interview on 5/30/2021 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator stated that it was her decision to restrict visitation for residents to the family room or the resident's room. She explained that she was concerned about the spread of COVID-19, even though the facility was not in a COVID-19 outbreak. She said COVID-19 was still a concern in the community. She stated she had been informed that Resident #47's family member was concerned because she was unable to visit and eat with her family member in the dining room. A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #47 on 3/22/23 with diagnoses including Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. Record review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/28/24 revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Surveyor: [NAME]
Nov 2022 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to act upon a Consultant Pharmacy (CP)...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to act upon a Consultant Pharmacy (CP) recommendation for psychotropic medications for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Resident #28 and Resident #35 Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy, Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR), with a revised date of 8/2/22, revealed, .8. Within 24 hours of the MRR, the Consultant Pharmacist provides a written report to the attending physicians for each resident identified as having a non-life-threatening medication irregularity. The report contains: a. the resident's name b. the name of the medication c. the identified irregularity and d. the pharmacist's recommendation . 14. The consultant pharmacist provides the director of nursing services and medical director with a written signed and dated copy of all medication regimen reports . 15. Copies of the medication regimen review reports, including physician responses, are maintained as part of the permanent medical record . Resident #28 A record review of the Order Summary Report, for Resident #28 revealed, . Active Orders As Of: 11/16/22 . Ativan Tablet 1 MG (LORazepam) Give 1 mg (milligrams) by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety . Order Date 8/11/22 and Start Date 8/11/22 . The physician's orders did not include a specific duration of time for the medication or an automatic stop date. A record review of the Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 9/23/22, and sent by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) for Resident #28 revealed, .PRN (as needed) PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION CONSULT . This resident has an order for Ativan 1 mg (milligram) q8h (every eight hours) prn for anxiety. New federal guidelines require that PRN psychotropic medication orders automatically discontinue after 14 days. The provider must re-write the PRN order every 14 days to continue the medication on a PRN basis . Record review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section N revealed .Medications Received- Indicate the number of DAYS the resident received the following medications by pharmacological classification .A.Antianxiety . The number of days entered that Resident #28 had received this medication was 7. A record review of the admission Record, revealed, the facility admitted Resident #28 on 2/21/22, with diagnoses that included Generalized Anxiety, and Schizophrenia. Resident #35 A record review of the Order Summary Report, for Resident #35 revealed, . Active Orders As Of: 11/15/22 . Ativan Tablet 1 MG (LORazepam) Give 1 mg (milligram) by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety . Order Date 2/04/22 and Start Date 2/04/22 . The physician's orders did not include a specific duration of time for the medication or an automatic stop date. A record review of the Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 8/23/22, and sent by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) for Resident #35 revealed, .PRN (as needed) PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION CONSULT . This resident has an order for Ativan 1 mg every 12 hrs (hours) prn for anxiety. New federal guidelines require that PRN psychotropic medication orders automatically discontinue after 14 days. The provider must re-write the PRN order every 14 days to continue the medication on a PRN basis . Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section N revealed .Medications Received- Indicate the number of DAYS the resident received the following medications by pharmacological classification .B.Antianxiety . The number of days entered that Resident #35 had received this medication was 7. A record review of the admission Record for Resident #35, revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/15/19, with the diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia with other Behavioral Disturbances. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/16/22 at 1:20 PM, she confirmed the Ativan PRN orders for Resident #28 and Resident #35 did not have a duration time or an automatic stop date. She also confirmed the resident's medical records did not contain clinical documentation with new orders to extend the Ativan beyond the 14 days. During a telephone interview with the facility's CP on 11/16/22 at 1:30 PM, she explained she sent the facility a recommendation regarding the PRN Ativan order for Resident #35 on 8/23/22, and a recommendation regarding the PRN Ativan order for Resident #28 on 9/23/22. She confirmed the PRN orders needed to have a specific duration of time for use and should only be used for 14 days but may be extended beyond 14 days if the provider documents clinical opinion, clinical rationale for extension, and a specific duration of time for the use of the PRN medication. She reported she has strongly encouraged this, but the facility does not always respond, and she keeps sending the recommendations. During an interview with the facility's Nurse Practitioner on 11/16/22 at 1:45 PM, she explained when the CP sends the Pharmacy recommendation regarding the PRN use, she will provide appropriate diagnosis, rationale for extension, and duration of use of either 30, 60, or 90 days. She reported she does not remember seeing the CP recommendations for Resident #28 and Resident #35. During an interview with the DON on 11/16/22 at 3:00 PM, she confirmed the CP resent the Pharmacy recommendations for the PRN Ativan for both Residents #28 and #35 but the facility could not locate the original Pharmacy recommendations and the recommendations had not been addressed by the prescriber.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were discontinued or documented as necessary after 14 days for t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were discontinued or documented as necessary after 14 days for two (2) of five (5) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Residents #28 and #35. Findings include: A record review of the facility's policy Use of Psychotropic Medication, with revision date of 10/01/2022, revealed Policy: Residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 8. PRN orders for all psychotropic drugs shall be used only when the medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record, and for a limited duration (i.e.14 days). a. If the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she shall document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order . Resident #28 A record review of the Order Summary Report, for Resident #28 revealed, . Active Orders As Of: 11/16/2022 . Ativan Tablet 1 MG (milligram) (LORazepam) Give 1 mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety . Order Date 08/11/2022 and Start Date 08/11/2022 . The order did not include a specific duration of time for the medication. A record review of the Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber, dated 09/23/22, and sent by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) for Resident #28 revealed, .PRN (as needed) PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION CONSULT . This resident has an order for Ativan 1 mg (milligram) q8h (every eight hours) prn for anxiety. New federal guidelines require that PRN psychotropic medication orders automatically discontinue after 14 days. The provider must re-write the PRN order every 14 days to continue the medication on a PRN basis . There was no response in the Physician/Prescriber Response section of the pharmacy recommendations. A record review of the admission Record, revealed, the facility admitted Resident #28 on 02/21/2022, with diagnoses that included Generalized Anxiety and Schizophrenia. Resident #35 A record review of the Order Summary Report, for Resident #35 revealed, . Active Orders As Of: 11/15/2022 . Ativan Tablet 1 MG (LORazepam) Give 1 mg by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety . Order Date 02/04/2022 and Start Date 02/04/2022 . The order did not include a specific duration of time. A record review of the Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber, dated 08/23/2022, and sent by the CP for Resident #35 revealed, .PRN (as needed) PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATION CONSULT . This resident has an order for Ativan 1 mg (milligram) q8h (every eight hours) prn for anxiety. New federal guidelines require that PRN psychotropic medication orders automatically discontinue after 14 days. The provider must re-write the PRN order every 14 days to continue the medication on a PRN basis . There was no response in the Physician/Prescriber Response section of the pharmacy recommendations. A record review of the admission Record, for Resident #35 revealed the facility admitted the resident 10/15/2019, with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia with other Behavioral Disturbances. On 11/16/2022 at 1:20 PM, during an interview with the DON, she confirmed the Ativan PRN order for Resident #35 does not have a specific duration time or a reason for continuation and she confirmed the Ativan PRN order for Resident #28 did not have an identified end date or the required prescriber documentation to extend the PRN order beyond 14 days. She reported psychotropic PRN medications can only be prescribed for 14 days and if needed longer, the prescriber must re-evaluate the resident and provide clinical documentation to support the extension. The facility's CP reported during a telephone interview on 11/16/2022 at 1:30 PM, on 08/23/2022 she sent the facility a recommendation regarding the PRN Ativan order for Resident #35 and on 09/23/2022 a recommendation regarding the PRN Ativan order for Resident #28. She confirmed the PRN orders needed to have a duration of use and should only be used for 14 days but may be extended beyond 14 days if the provided documents clinical opinion, clinical rationale for extension, and a specific duration of time for the use of the PRN medication. She reported she has strongly encouraged this, but the facility does not always respond. On 11/16/2022 at 1:45 PM, during an interview with the facility's Nurse Practitioner, she explained when the CP sends the Pharmacy recommendation regarding the PRN use, she will provide appropriate diagnosis, rationale for extension, and duration of use of either 30, 60, or 90 days. She reported she does not remember seeing the CP recommendations for Resident #28 and Resident #35.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection as evidenced by a nurse placing a biohazard bag conta...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection as evidenced by a nurse placing a biohazard bag containing soiled items on the floor, not performing hand hygiene after removing a soiled dressing and changing gloves, and by cleaning a tube of wound treatment medication with hand sanitizer and a tissue, for one (1) of 14 residents reviewed for infection control. Resident #7 Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy, Infection Control Guidelines for All Nursing Procedures, revised on 8/2/22, revealed, Purpose .To provide guidelines for general infection control while caring for residents .General Guidelines .4 .the preferred method of hand hygiene is with an alcohol-based hand rub .for all the following situations .h. After handling used dressing, contaminated equipment, etc.j. After removing gloves . A record review of the admission Record revealed the facility originally admitted Resident #7 on 5/16/2022. Diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Peripheral Vascular Disease. On 11/15/22 at 2:55 PM, during an observation of wound care for Resident #7 with RN #3, he reviewed the treatment orders and collected supplies to perform wound care. RN #3 removed the soiled dressing, removed his gloves, and applied a clean pair of gloves without washing or sanitizing his hands. After completing wound care, RN #3 removed the red plastic container that contained his supplies, tape, and tube of Medi-honey from the resident's room. He placed the red biohazard bag that contained soiled items on the floor in the hallway near the treatment cart. He discarded the tape in the garbage. He explained that he was going to wipe down the items he brought out of the resident's room. RN #3 went to the nurse's station and applied hand sanitizer to a tissue. He then began to wipe down the tube of Medi-honey with the tissue. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 observed RN #3 using the tissue with hand sanitizer and brought him a container of Super Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipes, also known as Purple Top wipes. RN #3 then wiped down the red plastic container and the top of his treatment cart with the Purple Top wipes. On 11/15/22 at 3:20 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), she explained RN #3 had been trained on wound care and had completed a skills competency check-off. She stated that RN #3 should have either washed his hands or used hand sanitizer after removing his gloves and before applying clean gloves, and he should have not cleaned the tube of Medi-honey with a tissue and hand sanitizer. She also confirmed that the red biohazard bag containing soiled items should not have been placed on the floor in the hallway to prevent the spread of infection. On 11/15/22 at 3:35 PM, during an interview with RN #3, he explained he should have washed or sanitized his hands after removing gloves his gloves and should have only taken the amount of Medi-honey needed into the resident's room, instead of the entire tube. He also confirmed that he should have used the Purple Top wipes to clean any items and not a tissue with hand sanitizer and that his actions related to infection control and did not prevent the spread of infection. On 11/16/22 at 10:50 AM, during an interview with the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) nurses, (RN #1 and RN #2) RN #1 confirmed that RN #3 should not have placed a biohazard bag containing soiled items on the floor and that it should have been taken straight to the biohazard room. She stated that placing the bag directly on the floor is an infection control issue and could spread infection throughout the facility. RN #2 explained that when cleaning supplies brought out of a resident's room, all supplies should be cleaned with Purple Top wipes to prevent the spread of infection. RN #2 said that the purpose of cleaning the items is to limit the contact of bacterial, blood, or body fluids on the items and spreading infections. RN #2 also commented that when RN #3 did not wash or sanitizer his hands after removing his gloves, he could have caused bacterial infections and the wound not to heal. A record review of the Nurse Orientation and Skills Checklist, dated 6/17/2022, revealed RN #3 received training on the Infection Control and Prevention Program. A record review of the Treatment/Skin Care Skills Checklist dated 6/17/2022, revealed RN #3 passed the skill checklist.
Aug 2019 5 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on resident interview, staff interview, record review, hospital record review, hospital staff interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on resident interview, staff interview, record review, hospital record review, hospital staff interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate and put measures in place to protect residents from possible sexual abuse, when the facility was notified that Resident #2, a cognitively impaired resident, tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease for one (1) of 22 residents reviewed for abuse, Resident #2. The facility's failure to protect Resident #2, and all other cognitively impaired residents, from possible sexual abuse, placed Resident #2 and other residents at risk in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) which began on 7/9/19, when the hospital notified the facility that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease, and Resident #2 returned to the facility without thorough investigation or protective measures put in place. The facility's Administrator was notified of the IJ and SQC on 8/7/19, at 10:25 AM, and provided with the IJ template. An acceptable credible Removal Plan was provided by the facility on 8/9/19, in which the facility alleged all corrective actions were completed as of 8/9/19, and the IJ was removed on 8/10/19. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan and determined that the IJ was removed on 8/10/19, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for the IJ and SQC at 42 CFR (s): 483.12 (a)(1), F600, Free from Abuse and Neglect, was lowered from a scope and severity of J to a scope and severity of D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights policy, undated, noted the resident has the right to be free from mental and physical abuse. The facility's policy, Abuse Prevention, Investigation and Reporting, dated 2/15/10, revealed the facility shall comply with all Regulations, Laws, Policies, Procedures and guidelines for prevention, investigation and reporting suspected Abuse. All employees shall report any suspected or alleged Resident mistreatment, suspicious bruising, neglect, mental or physical abuse, or injuries of unknown origin to the Nurse Supervisor or Department Head Appropriate action will be taken based on results of the investigation. All incidents of possible abuse will be initially investigated by the Administrator and/or designated facility staff. Review of a written complaint, reported by an outside source, on 7/10/19, revealed Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas on 7/9/19, and had previously tested negative for Trichomonas on 6/20/19. Record review revealed Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital on 7/9/19, for respiratory issues; and returned to the facility on 7/10/19. The Discharge Summary revealed a Diagnosis of Trichomonas Infection. The History and Hospital Course documented: Of note, patient's UA showed evidence of Trichomonas infection. I discussed with the ID specialist, she recommended treatment and reporting the case {to} the social services for further evaluation. Patient denies sexual contact or sexual abuse of any kind . Review of a urinalysis, for Resident #2, with a documented collection time of 7/9/19 at 04:55, revealed Rare A Trichomonas was present in the urine, with a normal reference range of none seen. The medical record revealed this was a catheterized specimen. A urinalysis, dated 6/20/19, revealed no Trichomonas was seen. Review of the local hospital record revealed Resident #2 received Metronidazole (Flagyl) 2000 milligrams by mouth (po) at 1:20 PM on 7/9/19, which is a treatment for Trichomonas. Record review revealed urinalysis results for Resident #2 on 6/20/19, 9/2/18, and 7/6/18, were all negative for Trichomonas. The Urinalysis result on 7/9/19, for Resident #2, tested positive for Trichomonas. In an interview on 8/5/19 at 3:32 PM, the State Epidemiologist stated that the only way to contact Trichomonas is through sexual contact. He stated based on the positive Trichomonas result for Resident #2 on 7/9/19, with a previous negative result, you had to treat the resident for Trichomonas. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/5/19 at 4:00 PM, revealed Resident #2 went to the hospital on 7/9/19, for respiratory issues and they diagnosed and treated her for Trichomonas. The DON confirmed the Urinalysis results from the admitting hospital on 7/9/19, showed Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, and her previous urinalysis results were negative for Trichomonas, prior to 7/9/19. The DON stated she talked to Resident #2's Primary Care Physician (PCP), who is also the Medical Director, who stated Resident #2 could have had Trichomonas a long time. The DON stated she talked to Resident #2, who denied having sex with anyone, but stated Resident #2 is confused. The DON stated she talked with Resident #2's brother, the resident's Responsible Party (RP), who reported he had not been aware of Resident #2 ever having a sexually transmitted disease. The DON stated she reviewed past video footage at Resident #2's door/hallway, and there was no unusual activity noted regarding other residents visiting, and only the brother visited the resident. The DON stated there was only one (1) male nurse who worked the 11:00 PM-7:00 AM shift and one (1) male Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) who worked the 3:00 PM-11:00 PM shift. There had been no testing of either staff member for Trichomonas. The DON stated the facility looked at abuse, because that is what you think of (with a positive Trichomonas test). The DON stated, I don't think she was abused, but we looked at it as best we could. The DON stated if someone is positive for Trichomonas, then you look for sexual assault when the resident can't give permission. The DON stated it is against a resident's rights if they have been abused. The DON stated no other residents had tested positive for Trichomonas. She also stated there was nothing out of the ordinary when viewing the video and interactions with other residents and no male residents were paying particular attention to Resident #2. The DON stated she was not sure if there had been any abuse training after this event. Further interview with the DON on 8/6/19 at 9:37 AM, confirmed Resident #2 had not been out on pass at any time during 2019, and as far as she could tell, had not been out in 2018. Facility letter-head documents, dated 8/6/19, and signed by the DON, reflected this data. Interview with the Administrator on 8/6/19 at 9:42 AM, revealed the facility had not tested male staff for Trichomonas since Resident #2 tested positive. Interview with the DON on 8/6/19 at 10:54 AM, revealed she had initially asked the hospital to repeat a UA after the first showed Trichomonas, but the hospital did not repeat the UA. The DON stated during the investigation, some of the nurses stated Resident #2 had a foul vaginal odor, but not sure for how long. The DON stated all findings were discussed during the Quality Assurance (QA) meeting. The DON stated she requested from Resident #2's PCP to repeat the UA here at the facility, but he stated not to repeat it since Resident #2 had already been treated. A message was left on 08/06/19 at 11:46 AM, for the Hospital Laboratory (Lab) Director to return a call to the surveyor at the facility. On 08/06/19 at 11:52 AM, a call was placed to the Hospital emergency room (ER) to speak with the ER Nurse Manager, and no one answered the page. On 08/06/19 at 1:26 PM, interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #6, revealed she did remember Resident #2 having a foul vaginal odor at one time, and stated a UA was sent for testing. Interview with RN #1, on 08/06/19 at 1:30 PM, revealed there was only one (1) resident on the unit that was being monitored for sexual behavior, Resident #11. RN #1 stated Resident #11 would touch others and touch employees. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the last UA was 8/23/17, which was negative for Trichomonas. During a phone interview, on 08/06/19 at 1:51 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 confirmed writing a statement on 7/9/19 at 5:30 PM, regarding Resident #2 and the foul/strong vaginal odor prior to her going to the hospital in July 2019. CNA #2 stated she was not aware of any male residents paying attention to Resident #2 or being in her room. On 08/06/19 at 02:10 PM, an attempt was made to interview the Nurse Manager for the hospital ER and the ER Nurse that collected the sample of urine from Resident #2. The Nurse Manager stated that the nurse who provided care to Resident #2 was on vacation and would not be back for a couple of weeks. The Nurse Manager referred questions to the hospital Risk Management Department. Per the Risk Manager, no further interview would be allowed per advice of their legal counsel. On 08/06/19 at 2:44 PM, a phone interview with Resident #2's PCP, revealed he had been the resident's doctor for years, not just in the nursing home, and would pull her chart and return the call. In a further interview on 08/06/19 at 3:09 PM, Resident #2's PCP stated he has treated Resident #2 since 1990, and Resident #2 had never had a positive UA for Trichomonas, and had not been treated for any other Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD). He also stated there was no indication of sexual trauma when he examined her. In an interview on 08/06/19 at 3:06 PM, CNA #4 confirmed a written statement on 7/9/19, that Resident #2 previous had a strong foul odor to her vaginal area that she had not noticed before. On 08/06/19 at 04:21 PM, in an interview with the DON, she stated law enforcement was not called regarding Resident #2, because they felt like there was nothing to report (no crime) after the investigation. In an interview, on 08/07/19 at 9:40 AM, the DON stated the ER Nurse had told her there was no visible signs of vaginal trauma on exam at the hospital, but no documentation was found for support. During an interview, on 08/07/19 at 10:10 AM, the Facility Administrator stated she first became aware that Resident #2 was positive for Trichomonas when the Hospital called on 7/9/19, from their Social Service Department, and notified the DON. The Administrator stated she and the DON were both responsible for conducting investigations. The Administrator stated they talked to the staff, viewed the video, talked to the Medical Director/Resident #2's PCP, and called the nurse on the floor at the hospital. The Administrator stated they talked to the ER Nurse that collected the sample of urine in the ER, and the ER nurse denied having seen any signs of bruising or trauma to Resident #2. The Administrator stated the facility requested that the hospital repeat the test, but had been told they couldn't, because the antibiotic had been started. The Administrator confirmed the AG's Office, the State Agency (SA), the Medical Director/Resident #2's PCP, and Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP) were notified, but the local law enforcement was not notified. The Administrator stated Resident #2's brother/RP denied having knowledge of Resident #2 ever being sexually abused or being positive for a sexually transmitted disease. The Administrator stated that Resident #2's PCP had said that Trichomonas could have been dormant, then all of the sudden flair up. The Administrator stated she did not call the local health department for guidance. The Administrator stated that no employees were tested at that time and no other residents were tested for Trichomonas. The Administrator stated, We felt like it didn't happen (no sexual assault), so we didn't do anything else. The facility did not put any monitors in place, nor further investigate to determine the possible source of the Trichomonas for Resident #2. In an interview, on 08/07/19 at 10:40 AM, the hospital Social Worker (SW) confirmed Resident #2 had a negative urine at the nursing home on 6/20/19, and on 7/9/19 at the hospital ER, Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas. The SW stated when she interviewed Resident #2, she was told by Resident #2 that she lived at home with her mother. The SW stated the resident was unable answer questions regarding any sexual activity, was confused and disoriented, and was not a reliable historian. During a phone interview, on 08/07/19 at 02:00 PM, the Criminal Investigator for the AG's Office stated that the facility informed him that Resident #2's PCP had told them that Trichomonas can be dormant and not active and undetectable, then flair up. He also stated the facility had informed him there was no evidence of forceful sex seen for Resident #2. Record review revealed a repeat Urinalysis for Resident #2, after antibiotic treatment, that was collected on 8/6/19 at 6:19 PM, with no Trichomonas seen. On 08/08/19 at 10:34 AM, interview with the District Ombudsman revealed that she nor the local Ombudsman was aware of the incident involving Resident #2 being positive for a STD. She stated that she had not had any other complaints from other residents regarding sexual abuse. In a phone interview on 08/08/19 at 02:42 PM, the Lab Director at the Hospital reported that as advised per Risk Management, that they would be allowed to talk with the surveyor later, but not this week, after an interview was attempted. In a post exit interview on 8/13/19 at 12:24 PM, the hospital Lab Director and Risk Manager revealed the lab reports to the doctor any unusual findings. The Lab Director confirmed a Urinalysis for Resident #2 was not repeated after the finding of Trichomonas being present on 7/9/19. The Lab Director also stated a test is either Positive or Negative, if Trichomonas was seen, then it is Positive. The Risk Manager stated as far as the hospital could tell, proper collection/labeling of the urine sample was done and the emergency room Nurse that collected the sample is on vacation and unavailable for interview at this time. The Risk Manager stated the emergency room Physician is also unavailable at this time for an interview. The facility admitted Resident #2 on 9/26/16, with the diagnoses which included, High Blood Pressure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Seizure Disorder, Osteoarthritis, Non-rheumatic Aortic (Valve) Stenosis and Psychotic Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date of 7/16/19, revealed Resident #2 scored 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 8/9/19, for the IJ. Review of the facility's Removal Plan revealed the facility took the following corrective actions to remove the IJ prior to exit. On July 9, 2019, Resident #2 was sent out to a local hospital for low Oxygen saturation. The hospital called to notify the Director of Nursing at the facility on July 9, 2019 at approximately 4:30 PM, that the resident was positive for Trichomonas. The State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility had been placed in Immediate Jeopardy at 10:25 AM, on August 7, 2019, for Failure to protect the resident due to alleged incident of abuse, Failure to report to the local law enforcement, and Failure to investigate thoroughly, once informed of the allegation and positive test results. Corrective actions: 1) An investigation was begun on July 9, 2019 at 5:00 PM, by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing. 2) A Chart review on Resident #2 occurred by the Director of Nursing on July 9, 2019 at 4:45 PM. This review included looking for previous urinalysis and review of diagnosis. It revealed that urinalysis on June 20, 2019, indicated no Trichomonas seen. 3) On July 9, 2019, at 4:50 PM, an Emergency Quality Assurance Committee Meeting was held via conference call with the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Registered Nurse/Infection Control (RN/IC) # 1, Registered Nurse (RN)# 2, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)# 1. The Medical Director was made aware of reported positive test results. After the discussion of the positive Trichomonas test there were no changes made to any policies and procedures and Resident #2 would remain across from the nurse's station with door open when no care is being provided and every two (2) hour rounds would remain in place. 4) Resident #2's brother was called by the DON and Administrator on July 9, 2019 at approximately 5:15 PM, and informed that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease. 5) Staff interviews began at approximately 5:30 PM on July 9, 2019, by the DON, and were completed on July 10, 2019 at approximately 5:00 PM. Six (6) interviews were conducted - Four (4) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), One (1) LPN and one (1) RN. Two (2) statements by CNA's indicated a foul odor was noted when changing. CNA # 3 stated: Resident #2 does have a strong odor to her while changing, much stronger when she had a Urinary Tract Infection. She does not wet frequently. CNA #4 stated: I've changes her once before when she wasn't my resident at the time and notice that she had a foul odor. I believe she had a UTI. During the interview the staff was asked if they had noticed any change in Resident #2's behavior. Their responses were negative. 6) Notification was made to the SA at approximately 6:00 PM on July 9, 2019, of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 7) The Attorney General's office was notified via eform on July 9, 2019 at 6:10 PM, of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 8) A Review of video footage occurred on July 10, 2019, by the Administrator at approximately 9:30 AM. Coverage reviewed started at July 3, 2019 at 10:00 PM, to July 9, 2019, when she was sent out. There was no unusual visitors or suspicious activity observed during the review of the video. This video footage was the only footage available for review. 9) Resident #2 returned to the facility on July 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM. Resident #74, Resident #2's roommate, and Resident #2 were interviewed after her return. Resident #74 with a BIMS score of 14 was interviewed by the DON on July 10, 2019 at approximately 5:00 PM, and her responses indicated there were no unwanted visitors for her or her roommate and no bothersome behavior or mistreatment toward them by visitors, residents, or staff. An interview by the DON and the Administrator with Resident #2 occurred at approximately 10:00 AM on July 11, 2019, and she revealed negative responses in the areas of inappropriate behavior towards her from others, being afraid, and any unwelcome visitors. Resident #2 with a BIMS score of 3 (Brief Interview of Mental Status) stated that she was happy living here. No other Resident interviews were done at this time. 10) To protect other residents from harm, the facility provided education on July 19, 22 and July 23, 2019 on Dignity, Respect, and Abuse. Nineteen (19) of 53 CNA's, nine (9) of 22 LPN's, seven (7) of nine (9) RN's, six (6) of six (6) Housekeeping, two (2) of three (3) Laundry, two (2) of two (2) Social Services, two (2) of two (2) Business Office, two (2) of four (4) Activity, ten (10) of 13 Dietary, two (2) of two (2) Floor Techs , one (1) of one (1) Central Supply, one (1) of one (1) Medical Records, zero (0) of one (1) Maintenance, one (1) of one (1) Courtyard Director, and zero (0) of three (3) Monitor Techs were trained. 11) At 10:58 AM on August 7, 2019, the local police department was called by the Administrator. They arrived at 11:05 AM to speak with the Administrator and Director of Nursing. They were provided a copy of the facility investigation and stated they would contact us on August 8, 2019, with a report and/or request for further action. 12) Education of all employees was conducted by Registered Nurse #5 beginning on August 7, 2019 at 2:30 PM, and concluded on August 8, 2019. Topics covered included: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. The Staff educated as of August, 8 2019 at 5:00 PM are as follows: Eighteen (18) of 22 LPN's, nine (9) of nine (9) RN's, 34 of 53 CNA's, three (3) of three (3) Laundry staff, six (6) of six (6) Housekeeping staff, three (3) of four (4) Activity staff, 13 of thirteen 13 Dietary staff, two (2) of two (2) Floor Technicians, one (1) of one (1) Maintenance staff, one (1) of one (1) Medical Records staff, one (1) of one (1) Central Supply staff, two (2) of two (2) Business Office staff, one (1) of one (1) Administrator, two (2) of two (2) Social Service staff, one (1) of one (1) Courtyard Director, and one (1) of three (3) Monitor Technicians. 13) No employee will be allowed to work until they are trained on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. 14) The Facility Administrator initiated a phone conference with the Nurse Practitioner at The Office of Epidemiology, Mississippi State Department of Health, on August 7, 2019 at approximately 3:00 PM to determine what type of testing of male employees needs to be done for Trichomonas. She stated the type of test would be a urine test. 15) Testing of all male employees for Trichomonas began August 8, 2019. Ten (10) of ten (10) results have returned with negative findings. 16) Ambulatory Resident #19 was tested for Trichomonas on August 8, 2019 at approximately 1:20 PM, and the result was negative. Resident #19 was tested for Trichomonas due to having recently being observed kissing a consenting female Resident #50. Resident #19 has a BIMS score of 15 and Resident #50 has a BIMS score of 15. There were no other reports to the Administrator or DON of any other male Residents exhibiting sexual behaviors or expressions between June 20, 2019 and July 9, 2019. 17) On August 9, 2019 at approximately 8:00 AM, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on cognitively impaired female residents with a BIMS score of 7 and below. A total of 34 female residents tested with lab results of 34 of 34 negative for Trichomonas. 18) On August 9, 2019 at approximately 8:00 AM, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on all male residents that are ambulatory and/or able to transfer in or out of a wheelchair without assistance. A total of 21 male residents tested with lab results of 21 of 21 negative for Trichomonas. 19) A 100% chart audit was conducted on August 9, 2019, which focused on the most recent urinalysis and diagnosis review. The chart audit revealed no diagnosis of Trichomonas and no urinalysis results were positive for Trichomonas. 20) On August 9, 2019 at approximately 2:30 PM cognitive female Residents with a BIMS score of 8 and above were interview by RN/IC #1, RN #2, Social Service Assistant and the Courtyard Director. These interviews revealed 30 of 30 residents expressed no concerns related to potential sexual abuse. 21) The QA Committee recommended a revision of the Hourly Resident Safety Rounds documentation form that was implemented August 9, 2019 at 4:00 PM, to protect Residents from sexual abuse. The QA Committee met on August 9, 2019 at 4:00 PM, with the Medical Director (per phone), Administrator, DON, RN/IC #1. RN #2 and LPN #1 in attendance. The facility asserts that the likelihood of serious harm in this matter will be removed effective August 10, 2019. The State Agency (SA) validated the facility's Removal Plan and determined the facility took the following actions to correct the IJ. 1. The SA validated through interviews and record review the facility conducted an investigation which began on July 9, 2019 by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing. 2. The SA validated by interviews and record review a chart review on Resident #2 occurred by the Director of Nursing on July 9, 2019. This review included looking for previous urinalysis and review of diagnosis. Interview with the DON revealed the urinalysis on June 20, 2019, indicated no Trichomonas seen. 3. The SA validated by interviews and sign in sheets on July 9, 2019, that an Emergency Quality Assurance Committee Meeting was held via conference call with the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Registered Nurse/Infection Control (RN/IC) # 1, Registered Nurse (RN)# 2, and Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN)# 1. Interview revealed the Medical Director was made aware of reported positive test results, no changes were made to any policies and procedures and Resident #2 would remain across from the nurse's station with door open when no care is being provided and every two (2) hour rounds would remain in place. 4. The SA validated through interviews that Resident #2's brother was called by the DON and Administrator on July 9, 2019, and informed that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease. 5. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that the facility began staff interviews on July 9, 2019, by the DON and were completed on July 10, 2019. Documentation included six (6) interviews were conducted - Four (4) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), One (1) LPN and one (1) RN. Two (2) statements by CNA's indicated a foul odor was noted when changing. CNA #3's documented statement: Resident #2 does have a strong odor to her while changing, much stronger when she had a Urinary Tract Infection. She does not wet frequently. CNA #4's documented statement: I've changes her once before when she wasn't my resident at the time and notice that she had a foul odor. I believe she had a UTI. Staff had not noticed any change in Resident #2's behavior. 6. The SA validated through record review and interview that the facility notified the SA on July 9, 2019 of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 7. The SA validated through interviews and record review the facility notified the Attorney General's office via eform on July 9, 2019, of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 8. The SA validated through interviews and facility investigation review that the facility reviewed the video footage on July 10, 2019 by the Administrator, covering July 3, 2019 at 10:00 PM to July 9, 2019, when the resident was sent out. Interview with the Administrator revealed there was no unusual visitors or suspicious activity observed during the review of the video. 9. The SA validated documentation that Resident #2 returned to the facility on July 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM. Interview with administrative staff revealed Resident #74, Resident #2's roommate, and Resident #2 were interviewed after her return. Resident #74 with a BIMS score of 14 was interviewed by the DON on July 10, 2019, and her responses indicated there were no unwanted visitors for her or her roommate and no bothersome behavior or mistreatment toward them by visitors, residents, or staff. An interview with the DON and the Administrator revealed interviews with Resident #2 occurred at approximately 10:00 am on July 11, 2019, and she revealed negative responses in the areas of inappropriate behavior towards her from others, being afraid, and any unwelcome visitors. Resident #2 with a BIMS score of 3 (Brief Interview of Mental Status) stated that she was happy living here. Interview with the Administrator and DON validated that no other Resident interviews were done at this time. 10. The SA validated through interviews, sign-in sheets, and record review, that the facility provided education on July 19, 22 and July 23, 2019 on Dignity, Respect, and Abuse, with staff attendance by signature. 11. The SA validated through interview with the Administrator that on August 7, 2019, the local police department was notified, and came to the facility. They were provided a copy of facility investigation and stated they would contact the facility with a report and/or request for further action. 12. The SA validated through interview, sign-in sheets, and record review, that education of all employees was conducted by Registered Nurse #5 beginning on August 7, 2019 and concluding on August 8, 2019. Topics covered included: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. The SA validated that all staff were educated as of August, 8, 2019. 13. The SA validated through interviews that no employee was allowed to work until they were trained on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. 14. The SA validated by interview with the Administrator, that the Facility Administrator initiated a phone conference with the Nurse Practitioner at The Office of Epidemiology, Mississippi State Department of Health, on August 7, 2019 to determine what type of testing of male employees needs to be done for Trichomonas and was informed the type of test would be a urine test. 15. The SA validated by record review and interviews that the facility initiated testing of all male employees for Trichomonas beginning August 8, 2019, and ten (10) of ten (10) results returned with negative findings. 16. The SA validated by record review and interviews that the facility tested Ambulatory Resident #19 for Trichomonas on August 8, 2019, with a negative result. Interview with administrative staff revealed there were no other reports of any other male Residents exhibiting sexual behaviors or expressions between June 20, 2019 and July 9, 2019. 17. The SA validated by interviews and record review that on August 9, 2019, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Tri[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0608 (Tag F0608)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the local law...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the local law enforcement of possible sexual abuse crime when Resident #2, a cognitively impaired resident, tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease, for one (1) of 22 residents reviewed for reporting abuse. Resident #2. The facility's failure to report to the local law enforcement of a possible sexual crime, when it was reported to the facility by the hospital, on 7/9/19, that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease, placed Resident #2 and other residents at risk in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC), which began on 7/9/19, when the hospital notified the facility that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease, and the facility failed to notify local law enforcement of a possible sex crime. The facility's Administrator was notified of the IJ and SQC on 8/7/19 at 10:25 AM, and provided with the IJ template. An acceptable credible Removal Plan was provided by the facility on 8/9/19, in which the facility alleged all corrective actions were completed as of 8/9/19, and the IJ was removed on 8/10/19. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan and determined that the IJ was removed on 8/10/19, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for the IJ and SQC at 42 CFR (s): 483.12 (b)(5)(i-iii)-F608, Reporting of Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, was lowered to a D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: The facility's policy, Abuse Prevention, Investigation and Reporting, undated, revealed the facility shall comply with all Regulations, Laws, Policies, Procedures and guidelines for prevention, investigation and reporting suspected Abuse. This policy noted the facility would report all reportable incidents to the local law enforcement pursuant to the Elder Justice Act of 2010. Review of the facility investion report, dated 7/12/19, revealed the facility was notified that Resident #2 was diagnosed with Trichomonas Infection on 7/9/19, after she was sent to the local hospital. There was no documentation that the facilty notified local law enforcement of a possible sexual crime, related to a resident who tested possitive for a sexually transmitted disease, who had no history of the disease. Resident #2 was cognitively impaired and unable to give consent for sexual relations. Review of a hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 had a Diagnosis of Trichomonas Infection. Review of a urinalysis for Resident #2, with a documented collection time of 7/9/19 at 04:55, revealed Rare A Trichomonas was present in Resident #2's urine, with a normal reference range of none seen. A comparative finding of a urinalysis for Resident #2, dated 6/20/19, revealed no Trichomonas was seen. During the interview with the State Epidemiologist on 8/5/19 at 03:32 PM, he stated based on the previous negative urine results for Resident #2, and then a positive result for Trichomonas was determined on 7/9/19, you would have to treat it as Trichomonas. He stated that the only way to contact Trichomonas is through sexual contact. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/5/19 at 4:00 PM, she stated that Resident #2 was diagnosed with Trichomonas on 7/9/19, when she was transferred to the hospital with shortness of breath. The DON stated she talked to the Attorney General's (AG)'s office, the facility looked at possible abuse, because that is what you think of when a resident suddenly becomes positive for a sexually transmitted disease. The DON stated, I don't think she was abused, but we looked at it as best we could. The DON stated if someone is positive for Trichomonas, and the resident can't give permission, then you look for sexual assault. The DON stated the facility reported this to the family, the AG's office, and the State Agency (SA) hotline, but did not include the local Law Enforcement. During an interview on 8/6/19 at 9:37 AM, the DON stated that Resident #2 had not been out on pass in 2018 or 2019. Interview with the DON on 8/6/19 at 10:54 AM, revealed she spoke with the AG's office on the phone, but the local Law Enforcement had not been notified. Further interview with the DON on 08/06/19 at 4:21 PM, revealed law enforcement was not called regarding Resident #2, because they felt like there was nothing to report (no crime) after the investigation. On 08/07/19 10:10 AM, the Administrator confirmed the Attorney General's (AG's) Office, the State Agency (SA), the Medical Director/Resident #2's PCP and Resident #2's Responsible Party (RP) were notified of Resident #2's positive test for Trichomonas, but the local police was not notified. The Administrator stated, We felt like it didn't happen (no sexual assault), so we didn't do anything else. The facility admitted Resident #2 on 9/26/16, with the diagnoses which included, Osteoarthritis, Hypertension (High Blood Pressure), Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Seizure Disorder, Non-rheumatic Aortic (Valve) Stenosis and Psychotic Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date of 7/16/19, revealed Resident #2 scored a 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 8/9/19, for the IJ. Review of the facility's Removal Plan revealed the facility took the following corrective actions to remove the IJ prior to exit. On July 9, 2019, Resident #2 was sent out to a local hospital for low Oxygen saturation. The hospital called to notify the Director of Nursing at the facility on July 9, 2019 at approximately 4:30 PM, that the resident was positive for Trichomonas. The State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility had been placed in Immediate Jeopardy at 10:25 AM, on August 7, 2019, for Failure to protect the resident due to alleged incident of abuse, Failure to report to the local law enforcement, and Failure to investigate thoroughly, once informed of the allegation and positive test results. Corrective actions: 1) An investigation was begun on July 9, 2019 at 5:00 PM, by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing. 2) A Chart review on Resident #2 occurred by the Director of Nursing on July 9, 2019 at 4:45 PM. This review included looking for previous urinalysis and review of diagnosis. It revealed that urinalysis on June 20, 2019, indicated no Trichomonas seen. 3) On July 9, 2019, at 4:50 PM, an Emergency Quality Assurance Committee Meeting was held via conference call with the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Registered Nurse/Infection Control (RN/IC) # 1, Registered Nurse (RN)# 2, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)# 1. The Medical Director was made aware of reported positive test results. After the discussion of the positive Trichomonas test there were no changes made to any policies and procedures and Resident #2 would remain across from the nurse's station with door open when no care is being provided and every two (2) hour rounds would remain in place. 4) Resident #2's brother was called by the DON and Administrator on July 9, 2019 at approximately 5:15 PM, and informed that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease. 5) Staff interviews began at approximately 5:30 PM on July 9, 2019, by the DON, and were completed on July 10, 2019 at approximately 5:00 PM. Six (6) interviews were conducted - Four (4) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), One (1) LPN and one (1) RN. Two (2) statements by CNA's indicated a foul odor was noted when changing. CNA # 3 stated: Resident #2 does have a strong odor to her while changing, much stronger when she had a Urinary Tract Infection. She does not wet frequently. CNA #4 stated: I've changes her once before when she wasn't my resident at the time and notice that she had a foul odor. I believe she had a UTI. During the interview the staff was asked if they had noticed any change in Resident #2's behavior. Their responses were negative. 6) Notification was made to the SA at approximately 6:00 PM on July 9, 2019, of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 7) The Attorney General's office was notified via eform on July 9, 2019 at 6:10 PM, of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 8) A Review of video footage occurred on July 10, 2019, by the Administrator at approximately 9:30 AM. Coverage reviewed started at July 3, 2019 at 10:00 PM, to July 9, 2019, when she was sent out. There was no unusual visitors or suspicious activity observed during the review of the video. This video footage was the only footage available for review. 9) Resident #2 returned to the facility on July 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM. Resident #74, Resident #2's roommate, and Resident #2 were interviewed after her return. Resident #74 with a BIMS score of 14 was interviewed by the DON on July 10, 2019 at approximately 5:00 PM, and her responses indicated there were no unwanted visitors for her or her roommate and no bothersome behavior or mistreatment toward them by visitors, residents, or staff. An interview by the DON and the Administrator with Resident #2 occurred at approximately 10:00 AM on July 11, 2019, and she revealed negative responses in the areas of inappropriate behavior towards her from others, being afraid, and any unwelcome visitors. Resident #2 with a BIMS score of 3 (Brief Interview of Mental Status) stated that she was happy living here. No other Resident interviews were done at this time. 10) To protect other residents from harm, the facility provided education on July 19, 22 and July 23, 2019 on Dignity, Respect, and Abuse. Nineteen (19) of 53 CNA's, nine (9) of 22 LPN's, seven (7) of nine (9) RN's, six (6) of six (6) Housekeeping, two (2) of three (3) Laundry, two (2) of two (2) Social Services, two (2) of two (2) Business Office, two (2) of four (4) Activity, ten (10) of 13 Dietary, two (2) of two (2) Floor Techs , one (1) of one (1) Central Supply, one (1) of one (1) Medical Records, zero (0) of one (1) Maintenance, one (1) of one (1) Courtyard Director, and zero (0) of three (3) Monitor Techs were trained. 11) At 10:58 AM on August 7, 2019, the local police department was called by the Administrator. They arrived at 11:05 AM to speak with the Administrator and Director of Nursing. They were provided a copy of the facility investigation and stated they would contact us on August 8, 2019, with a report and/or request for further action. 12) Education of all employees was conducted by Registered Nurse #5 beginning on August 7, 2019 at 2:30 PM, and concluded on August 8, 2019. Topics covered included: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. The Staff educated as of August, 8 2019 at 5:00 PM are as follows: Eighteen (18) of 22 LPN's, nine (9) of nine (9) RN's, 34 of 53 CNA's, three (3) of three (3) Laundry staff, six (6) of six (6) Housekeeping staff, three (3) of four (4) Activity staff, 13 of thirteen 13 Dietary staff, two (2) of two (2) Floor Technicians, one (1) of one (1) Maintenance staff, one (1) of one (1) Medical Records staff, one (1) of one (1) Central Supply staff, two (2) of two (2) Business Office staff, one (1) of one (1) Administrator, two (2) of two (2) Social Service staff, one (1) of one (1) Courtyard Director, and one (1) of three (3) Monitor Technicians. 13) No employee will be allowed to work until they are trained on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. 14) The Facility Administrator initiated a phone conference with the Nurse Practitioner at The Office of Epidemiology, Mississippi State Department of Health, on August 7, 2019 at approximately 3:00 PM to determine what type of testing of male employees needs to be done for Trichomonas. She stated the type of test would be a urine test. 15) Testing of all male employees for Trichomonas began August 8, 2019. Ten (10) of ten (10) results have returned with negative findings. 16) Ambulatory Resident #19 was tested for Trichomonas on August 8, 2019 at approximately 1:20 PM, and the result was negative. Resident #19 was tested for Trichomonas due to having recently being observed kissing a consenting female Resident #50. Resident #19 has a BIMS score of 15 and Resident #50 has a BIMS score of 15. There were no other reports to the Administrator or DON of any other male Residents exhibiting sexual behaviors or expressions between June 20, 2019 and July 9, 2019. 17) On August 9, 2019 at approximately 8:00 AM, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on cognitively impaired female residents with a BIMS score of 7 and below. A total of 34 female residents tested with lab results of 34 of 34 negative for Trichomonas. 18) On August 9, 2019 at approximately 8:00 AM, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on all male residents that are ambulatory and/or able to transfer in or out of a wheelchair without assistance. A total of 21 male residents tested with lab results of 21 of 21 negative for Trichomonas. 19) A 100% chart audit was conducted on August 9, 2019, which focused on the most recent urinalysis and diagnosis review. The chart audit revealed no diagnosis of Trichomonas and no urinalysis results were positive for Trichomonas. 20) On August 9, 2019 at approximately 2:30 PM cognitive female Residents with a BIMS score of 8 and above were interview by RN/IC #1, RN #2, Social Service Assistant and the Courtyard Director. These interviews revealed 30 of 30 residents expressed no concerns related to potential sexual abuse. 21) The QA Committee recommended a revision of the Hourly Resident Safety Rounds documentation form that was implemented August 9, 2019 at 4:00 PM, to protect Residents from sexual abuse. The QA Committee met on August 9, 2019 at 4:00 PM, with the Medical Director (per phone), Administrator, DON, RN/IC #1. RN #2 and LPN #1 in attendance. The facility asserts that the likelihood of serious harm in this matter will be removed effective August 10, 2019. The State Agency (SA) validated the facility's Removal Plan and determined the facility took the following actions to correct the IJ. 1. The SA validated through interviews and record review the facility conducted an investigation which began on July 9, 2019 by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing. 2. The SA validated by interviews and record review a chart review on Resident #2 occurred by the Director of Nursing on July 9, 2019. This review included looking for previous urinalysis and review of diagnosis. Interview with the DON revealed the urinalysis on June 20, 2019, indicated no Trichomonas seen. 3. The SA validated by interviews and sign in sheets on July 9, 2019, that an Emergency Quality Assurance Committee Meeting was held via conference call with the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Registered Nurse/Infection Control (RN/IC) # 1, Registered Nurse (RN)# 2, and Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN)# 1. Interview revealed the Medical Director was made aware of reported positive test results, no changes were made to any policies and procedures and Resident #2 would remain across from the nurse's station with door open when no care is being provided and every two (2) hour rounds would remain in place. 4. The SA validated through interviews that Resident #2's brother was called by the DON and Administrator on July 9, 2019, and informed that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease. 5. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that the facility began staff interviews on July 9, 2019, by the DON and were completed on July 10, 2019. Documentation included six (6) interviews were conducted - Four (4) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), One (1) LPN and one (1) RN. Two (2) statements by CNA's indicated a foul odor was noted when changing. CNA #3's documented statement: Resident #2 does have a strong odor to her while changing, much stronger when she had a Urinary Tract Infection. She does not wet frequently. CNA #4's documented statement: I've changes her once before when she wasn't my resident at the time and notice that she had a foul odor. I believe she had a UTI. Staff had not noticed any change in Resident #2's behavior. 6. The SA validated through record review and interview that the facility notified the SA on July 9, 2019 of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 7. The SA validated through interviews and record review the facility notified the Attorney General's office via eform on July 9, 2019, of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 8. The SA validated through interviews and facility investigation review that the facility reviewed the video footage on July 10, 2019 by the Administrator, covering July 3, 2019 at 10:00 PM to July 9, 2019, when the resident was sent out. Interview with the Administrator revealed there was no unusual visitors or suspicious activity observed during the review of the video. 9. The SA validated documentation that Resident #2 returned to the facility on July 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM. Interview with administrative staff revealed Resident #74, Resident #2's roommate, and Resident #2 were interviewed after her return. Resident #74 with a BIMS score of 14 was interviewed by the DON on July 10, 2019, and her responses indicated there were no unwanted visitors for her or her roommate and no bothersome behavior or mistreatment toward them by visitors, residents, or staff. An interview with the DON and the Administrator revealed interviews with Resident #2 occurred at approximately 10:00 am on July 11, 2019, and she revealed negative responses in the areas of inappropriate behavior towards her from others, being afraid, and any unwelcome visitors. Resident #2 with a BIMS score of 3 (Brief Interview of Mental Status) stated that she was happy living here. Interview with the Administrator and DON validated that no other Resident interviews were done at this time. 10. The SA validated through interviews, sign-in sheets, and record review, that the facility provided education on July 19, 22 and July 23, 2019 on Dignity, Respect, and Abuse, with staff attendance by signature. 11. The SA validated through interview with the Administrator that on August 7, 2019, the local police department was notified, and came to the facility. They were provided a copy of facility investigation and stated they would contact the facility with a report and/or request for further action. 12. The SA validated through interview, sign-in sheets, and record review, that education of all employees was conducted by Registered Nurse #5 beginning on August 7, 2019 and concluding on August 8, 2019. Topics covered included: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. The SA validated that all staff were educated as of August, 8, 2019. 13. The SA validated through interviews that no employee was allowed to work until they were trained on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. 14. The SA validated by interview with the Administrator, that the Facility Administrator initiated a phone conference with the Nurse Practitioner at The Office of Epidemiology, Mississippi State Department of Health, on August 7, 2019 to determine what type of testing of male employees needs to be done for Trichomonas and was informed the type of test would be a urine test. 15. The SA validated by record review and interviews that the facility initiated testing of all male employees for Trichomonas beginning August 8, 2019, and ten (10) of ten (10) results returned with negative findings. 16. The SA validated by record review and interviews that the facility tested Ambulatory Resident #19 for Trichomonas on August 8, 2019, with a negative result. Interview with administrative staff revealed there were no other reports of any other male Residents exhibiting sexual behaviors or expressions between June 20, 2019 and July 9, 2019. 17. The SA validated by interviews and record review that on August 9, 2019, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on cognitively impaired female residents with a BIMS score of 7 and below. A total of 34 female residents tested with lab results negative for Trichomonas. 18. The SA validated by interviews that on August 9, 2019, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on all male residents that are ambulatory and/or able to transfer in or out of a wheelchair without assistance. A total of 21 male residents tested with lab results negative for Trichomonas. 19. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that the facility conducted 100% chart audit on August 9, 2019, which focused on the most recent urinalysis and diagnosis review. The chart audit revealed no diagnosis of Trichomonas and no urinalysis results were positive for Trichomonas. 20. The SA validated by interviews that on August 9, 2019, cognitive female Residents with a BIMS score of 8 and above were interview by RN/IC #1, RN #2, Social Service assistant and the Courtyard Director. These interviews revealed 30 of 30 residents expressed no concerns related to potential sexual abuse. 21. The SA validated through interviews and sign-in sheets that the QA Committee recommended a revision of the Hourly Resident Safety Rounds documentation form that was implemented August 9, 2019, to protect Residents from sexual abuse. Interview validated that the QA Committee met on August 9, 2019 at 4:00 PM with the Medical Director (per phone), Administrator, DON, RN/IC #1. RN #2 and LPN #1 in attendance. The SA validated that all corrective actions were completed as of 8/9/19, and the IJ was removed on 8/10/19.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for possible sexual abuse, when Resident #2, a cognitively ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, facility investigation review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for possible sexual abuse, when Resident #2, a cognitively impaired resident, with no history of Trichomonas, tested positive for Trichomonas (a sexually transmitted disease), for one (1) of 22 residents reviewed for investigating abuse, Resident #2. The facility's failure to conduct a thorough investigation put Resident #2, and all other cognitively impaired residents at risk for possible sexual abuse, when it was reported to the facility by the hospital, on 7/9/19, that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas. This placed Resident #2 and other residents at risk in a situation that was likely to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The situation was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and Substandard Quality of Care (SQC) which began on 7/9/19, when the hospital notified the facility that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease. The facility's Administrator was notified of the IJ and SQC on 8/7/19 at 10:25 AM, and provided with the IJ template. An acceptable credible Removal Plan was provided by the facility on 8/9/19, in which the facility alleged all corrective actions were completed as of 8/9/19, and the IJ was removed on 8/10/19. The State Agency (SA) validated the Removal Plan and determined that the IJ was removed on 8/10/19, prior to exit. Therefore, the scope and severity for the IJ and SQC at 42 CFR(s) 483.12 (c)(2-4)-F610, Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations, was lowered to a D, while the facility develops and implements a plan of correction and monitors the effectiveness of the systemic changes to ensure the facility sustains compliance with regulatory requirements. Findings include: The facility's policy, Abuse Prevention, Investigation and Reporting, undated, revealed the facility shall comply with all Regulations, Laws, Policies, Procedures and guidelines for prevention, investigation and reporting suspected Abuse. Review of a written complaint, reported by an outside source, on 7/10/19, revealed Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas on 7/9/19, and had previously tested negative for Trichomonas on 6/20/19. Record review revealed Urinalysis results for Resident #2 on 6/20/19, 9/2/18, and 7/6/18, tested negative for Trichomonas. A review of the Urinalysis result on 7/9/19, for Resident #2, tested positive for Trichomonas. Review of the documented facility investigation, dated 7/12/19, revealed the facility was notified that Resident #2 was diagnosed with Trichomonas Infection on 7/9/19, after she was sent to the local hospital. There was no documentation that the facilty notified local law enforcement of a possible sexual crime, no documentation that Resident #2 was placed on close observation after return from the hospital, no documentation that other residents/staff were tested or reviewed for sexually transmitted diseases, and no documentation that all staff were educated for investigating allegations of abuse related to a positive result of a sexually transmitted disease (STD). Resident #2 was cognitively impaired and unable to give consent for sexual relations. In an interview on 8/5/19 at 4:00 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that Resident #2 was transferred to the hospital on 7/9/19, for shortness of breath and when a urinalysis was done, it showed a positive result for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease. The DON confirmed Resident #2's previous urinalysis results were negative for Trichomonas. The DON stated when she spoke with Resident #2's Primary Care Physician (PCP), he stated that Resident #2 could have had Trichomonas a long time. The DON also stated when she talked to Resident #2, she denied having sex with anyone, but confirmed Resident #2 is confused and not a good historian. The DON stated Resident #2's brother, the Responsible Party (RP), reported he had not been aware of Resident #2 ever having a sexually transmitted disease or Trichomonas. The DON stated the facility considered abuse, because that is what you think of with a sexually transmitted disease of a cognitively impaired resident. The DON stated, I don't think she was abused, but we looked at it as best we could. The DON said if someone is positive for Trichomonas, then you look for sexual assault when they can't give permission. In an interview on 08/06/19 at 03:09 PM, Resident #2's Physician stated he had been Resident #2's physician since 1990, and Resident #2 had not ever had a positive UA for Trichomonas, and had not been treated for any other Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD). He stated Resident #2 had no indication of sexual trauma. On 08/07/19 at 9:40 AM, interview with the DON revealed that in the verbal hospital report, the ER Nurse told her there was no visible signs of vaginal trauma on exam, but there was no documentation found in the record. On 08/07/19 at 10:10 AM, interview with the Facility Administrator revealed she first became aware that Resident #2 was positive for Trichomonas when the Hospital called on 7/9/19, from their Social Service Department and reported it to the DON. The Administrator stated she and the DON are both responsible for conducting the investigation. The Administrator stated they talked to the staff, viewed the video, talked to the Medical Director/Resident #2's Physician, and called the nurse on the floor at the hospital. The Administrator confirmed both she and the DON talked to the ER Nurse that collected the sample of urine in the ER, who denied having seen any signs of bruising or trauma to Resident #2. The Administrator confirmed the facility requested the hospital repeat the Urinalysis, but was told they couldn't because they had already started the antibiotic. The Administrator confirmed Resident #2's brother/RP denied having knowledge of Resident #2 ever being sexually abused or being positive for a sexually transmitted disease. The Administrator stated that Resident #2's PCP told her that Trichomonas could have been dormant, then all of the sudden flair up. The Administrator confirmed she did not call the local health department for guidance on Trichomonas. The Administrator stated that no employees were tested at that time and no other residents were tested. The Administrator stated, We felt like it didn't happen (no sexual assault), so we didn't do anything else. In an interview on 08/07/19 at 10:40 AM, the Hospital Social Worker (SW) confirmed the hospital reported to the SA hotline, for the ER Physician, regarding Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas on 7/9/19. The SW stated when she interviewed Resident #2 she was told that she lived at home with her mother. She stated that Resident #2 was confused and disoriented and unable to answer questions regarding any sexual activity and was not a reliable historian. In a phone interview on 08/07/19 at 2:00 PM, the Criminal Investigator for the AG's Office stated that the facility informed him that Resident #2's Physician had said that Trichomonas can be dormant and not active and undetectable, then flair up. He also stated the facility had informed him there was no evidence of forceful sex seen for Resident #2. The facility admitted Resident #2 on 9/26/16, with the diagnoses which included, High Blood Pressure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Seizure Disorder, Osteoarthritis, Non-rheumatic Aortic (Valve) Stenosis and Psychotic Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with the Assessment Reference Date of 7/16/19 revealed Resident #2 scored a 3 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), which indicated Resident #2 was severely cognitively impaired. The facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan on 8/9/19, for the IJ. Review of the facility's Removal Plan revealed the facility took the following corrective actions to remove the IJ prior to exit. On July 9, 2019, Resident #2 was sent out to a local hospital for low Oxygen saturation. The hospital called to notify the Director of Nursing at the facility on July 9, 2019 at approximately 4:30 PM, that the resident was positive for Trichomonas. The State Agency notified the Administrator that the facility had been placed in Immediate Jeopardy at 10:25 AM, on August 7, 2019, for Failure to protect the resident due to alleged incident of abuse, Failure to report to the local law enforcement, and Failure to investigate thoroughly, once informed of the allegation and positive test results. Corrective actions: 1) An investigation was begun on July 9, 2019 at 5:00 PM, by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing. 2) A Chart review on Resident #2 occurred by the Director of Nursing on July 9, 2019 at 4:45 PM. This review included looking for previous urinalysis and review of diagnosis. It revealed that urinalysis on June 20, 2019, indicated no Trichomonas seen. 3) On July 9, 2019, at 4:50 PM, an Emergency Quality Assurance Committee Meeting was held via conference call with the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Registered Nurse/Infection Control (RN/IC) # 1, Registered Nurse (RN)# 2, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)# 1. The Medical Director was made aware of reported positive test results. After the discussion of the positive Trichomonas test there were no changes made to any policies and procedures and Resident #2 would remain across from the nurse's station with door open when no care is being provided and every two (2) hour rounds would remain in place. 4) Resident #2's brother was called by the DON and Administrator on July 9, 2019 at approximately 5:15 PM, and informed that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease. 5) Staff interviews began at approximately 5:30 PM on July 9, 2019, by the DON, and were completed on July 10, 2019 at approximately 5:00 PM. Six (6) interviews were conducted - Four (4) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), One (1) LPN and one (1) RN. Two (2) statements by CNA's indicated a foul odor was noted when changing. CNA # 3 stated: Resident #2 does have a strong odor to her while changing, much stronger when she had a Urinary Tract Infection. She does not wet frequently. CNA #4 stated: I've changes her once before when she wasn't my resident at the time and notice that she had a foul odor. I believe she had a UTI. During the interview the staff was asked if they had noticed any change in Resident #2's behavior. Their responses were negative. 6) Notification was made to the SA at approximately 6:00 PM on July 9, 2019, of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 7) The Attorney General's office was notified via eform on July 9, 2019 at 6:10 PM, of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 8) A Review of video footage occurred on July 10, 2019, by the Administrator at approximately 9:30 AM. Coverage reviewed started at July 3, 2019 at 10:00 PM, to July 9, 2019, when she was sent out. There was no unusual visitors or suspicious activity observed during the review of the video. This video footage was the only footage available for review. 9) Resident #2 returned to the facility on July 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM. Resident #74, Resident #2's roommate, and Resident #2 were interviewed after her return. Resident #74 with a BIMS score of 14 was interviewed by the DON on July 10, 2019 at approximately 5:00 PM, and her responses indicated there were no unwanted visitors for her or her roommate and no bothersome behavior or mistreatment toward them by visitors, residents, or staff. An interview by the DON and the Administrator with Resident #2 occurred at approximately 10:00 AM on July 11, 2019, and she revealed negative responses in the areas of inappropriate behavior towards her from others, being afraid, and any unwelcome visitors. Resident #2 with a BIMS score of 3 (Brief Interview of Mental Status) stated that she was happy living here. No other Resident interviews were done at this time. 10) To protect other residents from harm, the facility provided education on July 19, 22 and July 23, 2019 on Dignity, Respect, and Abuse. Nineteen (19) of 53 CNA's, nine (9) of 22 LPN's, seven (7) of nine (9) RN's, six (6) of six (6) Housekeeping, two (2) of three (3) Laundry, two (2) of two (2) Social Services, two (2) of two (2) Business Office, two (2) of four (4) Activity, ten (10) of 13 Dietary, two (2) of two (2) Floor Techs , one (1) of one (1) Central Supply, one (1) of one (1) Medical Records, zero (0) of one (1) Maintenance, one (1) of one (1) Courtyard Director, and zero (0) of three (3) Monitor Techs were trained. 11) At 10:58 AM on August 7, 2019, the local police department was called by the Administrator. They arrived at 11:05 AM to speak with the Administrator and Director of Nursing. They were provided a copy of the facility investigation and stated they would contact us on August 8, 2019, with a report and/or request for further action. 12) Education of all employees was conducted by Registered Nurse #5 beginning on August 7, 2019 at 2:30 PM, and concluded on August 8, 2019. Topics covered included: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. The Staff educated as of August, 8 2019 at 5:00 PM are as follows: Eighteen (18) of 22 LPN's, nine (9) of nine (9) RN's, 34 of 53 CNA's, three (3) of three (3) Laundry staff, six (6) of six (6) Housekeeping staff, three (3) of four (4) Activity staff, 13 of thirteen 13 Dietary staff, two (2) of two (2) Floor Technicians, one (1) of one (1) Maintenance staff, one (1) of one (1) Medical Records staff, one (1) of one (1) Central Supply staff, two (2) of two (2) Business Office staff, one (1) of one (1) Administrator, two (2) of two (2) Social Service staff, one (1) of one (1) Courtyard Director, and one (1) of three (3) Monitor Technicians. 13) No employee will be allowed to work until they are trained on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. 14) The Facility Administrator initiated a phone conference with the Nurse Practitioner at The Office of Epidemiology, Mississippi State Department of Health, on August 7, 2019 at approximately 3:00 PM to determine what type of testing of male employees needs to be done for Trichomonas. She stated the type of test would be a urine test. 15) Testing of all male employees for Trichomonas began August 8, 2019. Ten (10) of ten (10) results have returned with negative findings. 16) Ambulatory Resident #19 was tested for Trichomonas on August 8, 2019 at approximately 1:20 PM, and the result was negative. Resident #19 was tested for Trichomonas due to having recently being observed kissing a consenting female Resident #50. Resident #19 has a BIMS score of 15 and Resident #50 has a BIMS score of 15. There were no other reports to the Administrator or DON of any other male Residents exhibiting sexual behaviors or expressions between June 20, 2019 and July 9, 2019. 17) On August 9, 2019 at approximately 8:00 AM, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on cognitively impaired female residents with a BIMS score of 7 and below. A total of 34 female residents tested with lab results of 34 of 34 negative for Trichomonas. 18) On August 9, 2019 at approximately 8:00 AM, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on all male residents that are ambulatory and/or able to transfer in or out of a wheelchair without assistance. A total of 21 male residents tested with lab results of 21 of 21 negative for Trichomonas. 19) A 100% chart audit was conducted on August 9, 2019, which focused on the most recent urinalysis and diagnosis review. The chart audit revealed no diagnosis of Trichomonas and no urinalysis results were positive for Trichomonas. 20) On August 9, 2019 at approximately 2:30 PM cognitive female Residents with a BIMS score of 8 and above were interview by RN/IC #1, RN #2, Social Service Assistant and the Courtyard Director. These interviews revealed 30 of 30 residents expressed no concerns related to potential sexual abuse. 21) The QA Committee recommended a revision of the Hourly Resident Safety Rounds documentation form that was implemented August 9, 2019 at 4:00 PM, to protect Residents from sexual abuse. The QA Committee met on August 9, 2019 at 4:00 PM, with the Medical Director (per phone), Administrator, DON, RN/IC #1. RN #2 and LPN #1 in attendance. The facility asserts that the likelihood of serious harm in this matter will be removed effective August 10, 2019. The State Agency (SA) validated the facility's Removal Plan and determined the facility took the following actions to correct the IJ. 1. The SA validated through interviews and record review the facility conducted an investigation which began on July 9, 2019 by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing. 2. The SA validated by interviews and record review a chart review on Resident #2 occurred by the Director of Nursing on July 9, 2019. This review included looking for previous urinalysis and review of diagnosis. Interview with the DON revealed the urinalysis on June 20, 2019, indicated no Trichomonas seen. 3. The SA validated by interviews and sign in sheets on July 9, 2019, that an Emergency Quality Assurance Committee Meeting was held via conference call with the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), Registered Nurse/Infection Control (RN/IC) # 1, Registered Nurse (RN)# 2, and Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN)# 1. Interview revealed the Medical Director was made aware of reported positive test results, no changes were made to any policies and procedures and Resident #2 would remain across from the nurse's station with door open when no care is being provided and every two (2) hour rounds would remain in place. 4. The SA validated through interviews that Resident #2's brother was called by the DON and Administrator on July 9, 2019, and informed that Resident #2 tested positive for Trichomonas, a sexually transmitted disease. 5. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that the facility began staff interviews on July 9, 2019, by the DON and were completed on July 10, 2019. Documentation included six (6) interviews were conducted - Four (4) Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), One (1) LPN and one (1) RN. Two (2) statements by CNA's indicated a foul odor was noted when changing. CNA #3's documented statement: Resident #2 does have a strong odor to her while changing, much stronger when she had a Urinary Tract Infection. She does not wet frequently. CNA #4's documented statement: I've changes her once before when she wasn't my resident at the time and notice that she had a foul odor. I believe she had a UTI. Staff had not noticed any change in Resident #2's behavior. 6. The SA validated through record review and interview that the facility notified the SA on July 9, 2019 of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 7. The SA validated through interviews and record review the facility notified the Attorney General's office via eform on July 9, 2019, of a report of Resident #2 testing positive for Trichomonas. 8. The SA validated through interviews and facility investigation review that the facility reviewed the video footage on July 10, 2019 by the Administrator, covering July 3, 2019 at 10:00 PM to July 9, 2019, when the resident was sent out. Interview with the Administrator revealed there was no unusual visitors or suspicious activity observed during the review of the video. 9. The SA validated documentation that Resident #2 returned to the facility on July 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM. Interview with administrative staff revealed Resident #74, Resident #2's roommate, and Resident #2 were interviewed after her return. Resident #74 with a BIMS score of 14 was interviewed by the DON on July 10, 2019, and her responses indicated there were no unwanted visitors for her or her roommate and no bothersome behavior or mistreatment toward them by visitors, residents, or staff. An interview with the DON and the Administrator revealed interviews with Resident #2 occurred at approximately 10:00 am on July 11, 2019, and she revealed negative responses in the areas of inappropriate behavior towards her from others, being afraid, and any unwelcome visitors. Resident #2 with a BIMS score of 3 (Brief Interview of Mental Status) stated that she was happy living here. Interview with the Administrator and DON validated that no other Resident interviews were done at this time. 10. The SA validated through interviews, sign-in sheets, and record review, that the facility provided education on July 19, 22 and July 23, 2019 on Dignity, Respect, and Abuse, with staff attendance by signature. 11. The SA validated through interview with the Administrator that on August 7, 2019, the local police department was notified, and came to the facility. They were provided a copy of facility investigation and stated they would contact the facility with a report and/or request for further action. 12. The SA validated through interview, sign-in sheets, and record review, that education of all employees was conducted by Registered Nurse #5 beginning on August 7, 2019 and concluding on August 8, 2019. Topics covered included: Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. The SA validated that all staff were educated as of August, 8, 2019. 13. The SA validated through interviews that no employee was allowed to work until they were trained on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation including but not limited to: signs and systems of sexual abuse; Reporting of a Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime to local law enforcement; Reporting of Alleged Abuse and Neglect; and Investigation/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violations to including but not limited to doing a complete investigation. 14. The SA validated by interview with the Administrator, that the Facility Administrator initiated a phone conference with the Nurse Practitioner at The Office of Epidemiology, Mississippi State Department of Health, on August 7, 2019 to determine what type of testing of male employees needs to be done for Trichomonas and was informed the type of test would be a urine test. 15. The SA validated by record review and interviews that the facility initiated testing of all male employees for Trichomonas beginning August 8, 2019, and ten (10) of ten (10) results returned with negative findings. 16. The SA validated by record review and interviews that the facility tested Ambulatory Resident #19 for Trichomonas on August 8, 2019, with a negative result. Interview with administrative staff revealed there were no other reports of any other male Residents exhibiting sexual behaviors or expressions between June 20, 2019 and July 9, 2019. 17. The SA validated by interviews and record review that on August 9, 2019, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on cognitively impaired female residents with a BIMS score of 7 and below. A total of 34 female residents tested with lab results negative for Trichomonas. 18. The SA validated by interviews that on August 9, 2019, the facility began obtaining urine samples for Trichomonas on all male residents that are ambulatory and/or able to transfer in or out of a wheelchair without assistance. A total of 21 male residents tested with lab results negative for Trichomonas. 19. The SA validated through interviews and record reviews that the facility conducted 100% chart audit on August 9, 2019, which focused on the most recent urinalysis and diagnosis review. The chart audit revealed no diagnosis of Trichomonas and no urinalysis results were positive for Trichomonas. 20. The SA validated by interviews that on August 9, 2019, cognitive female Residents with a BIMS score of 8 and above were interview by RN/IC #1, RN #2, Social Service assistant and the Courtyard Director. These interviews revealed 30 of 30 residents expressed no concerns related to potential sexual abuse. 21. The SA validated through interviews and sign-in sheets that the QA Committee recommended a revision of the Hourly Resident Safety Rounds documentation form that was implemented August 9, 2019, to protect Residents from sexual abuse. Interview validated that the QA Committee met on August 9, 2019 at 4:00 PM with the Medical Director (per phone), Administrator, DON, RN/IC #1. RN #2 and LPN #1 in attendance. The SA validated that all corrective actions were completed as of 8/9/19, and the IJ was removed on 8/10/19.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) related to a resident being at risk for pressure ulcers/injuries for one (1) of 25 MDS reviews. (Resident #18) Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessment Instrument, dated March 2017, revealed that it is the policy of this facility that a comprehensive assessment of a resident's needs shall be made upon the resident's admission and periodically as mandated by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) and Medicare guidelines. The facility policy noted that the purpose of the assessment is to describe the resident's capability to perform daily life functions and to identify significant impairments in functional capacity. The facility policy noted that the nursing department will be responsible for completing and entering into the computer system MDS sections A, G, GG, H, I, J, M, N, O, P, S, V, and Z. The facility policy also noted that all persons who have completed any portion of the MDS Resident Assessment Form, must sign such document attesting to the accuracy of such information. Review of the facility policy titled, Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment, dated May 2012, revealed that it is the policy of this facility that the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the assessment and identification of residents at risk of developing pressure ulcers. The facility policy also noted that during the risk assessment, the Braden Scale pressure ulcer risk assessment will be completed upon admission, weekly times (x) four (4) weeks and with each additional assessment; quarterly, annually, and with significant changes. The facility policy states that because a resident at risk can develop a pressure ulcer within two (2) to six (6) hours of the onset of pressure, the at risk resident needs to be identified and have interventions implemented promptly to attempt to prevent pressure ulcers. Review #18 Review of Resident #18's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/30/2019, revealed Section M0150 was coded 0, which indicated that Resident #18 was not at risk of developing pressure ulcers/injury. The MDS also revealed that in subsection A of the Z0400 Section, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, the MDS Nurse signed as having completed the M section of the MDS. Review of an Initial Wound Assessment 2, dated 7/22/2019, revealed that Resident #18 had an excoriation to the coccyx area. Resident #18's wound assessment noted that there was only partial depth of tissue injury. Resident #18's wound assessment noted a treatment plan to clean with Baby Shampoo and H2O (water), pat dry, cover with Aquacel foam dressing daily and as needed. Resident #18's wound assessment was completed by Registered Nurse (RN) #2/ Resident Care Coordinator on 7/22/2019. Review of Resident #18's Plan of Care - Current, dated 8/8/2019, revealed a focused problem of a bleachable excoriation to the coccyx with potential for pressure ulcers and a history of pressure ulcers had an effective date of 07/22/2019. During an interview on 8/8/2019 at 1:55 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 and the MDS Nurse confirmed that the Quarterly MDS dated for 7/30/2019, was coded 0 in the M0150 section, indicating that Resident #18 is not at risk for pressure ulcers/injuries. LPN #1 stated Resident #18 is at risk for pressure ulcers and a one 1 should have been coded on the MDS, section M0150. LPN #1 stated, It's an error, just a slip up. LPN stated, I can fix that right now. During an interview on 08/09/2019 at 11:46 AM, the DON stated that Resident #18 is at risk for pressure ulcers and it should have been coded on the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. Review of the Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #18 on 2/5/2019, with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, and Type Two (2) Diabetes Mellitus.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection for one (1) of three (3) residents during wound observ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection for one (1) of three (3) residents during wound observation, Resident #18. Findings include: Review of the facility policy tilted, Infection Control Guidelines for All Nursing Procedures, dated August 2015, revealed the purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for general infection control while caring for residents. The facility policy noted that standard precautions will be used in the care of all residents in all situations, regardless of suspected or confirmed presence of infectious diseases. The facility policy noted that standard precautions apply to blood, body fluids, secretions, and excretions. During an observation, on 8/5/2019 at 10:15 AM, incontinent care was provided to Resident #18 by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5. CNA #6 assisted CNA #5 by positioning Resident #18 on to her side. During the incontinent care, CNA #5 pulled back on a loose dressing, with a soiled gloved hand, located on Resident #18's coccyx area. CNA #5 held the dressing with a gloved hand and with the other gloved hand she cleaned the area that was covered by the dressing with a soiled wipe. CNA #5 used her soiled gloved hand to put the dressing back in place. CNA #5 used the soiled gloved hand to hold the dressing in place while she secured the Resident #18's brief. During an interview, on 8/5/2019 at 10:31 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 confirmed that she should have not cleaned under the dressing. CNA #5 stated, I didn't change gloves or wash my hand when I pulled the dressing back. CNA#5 also stated that cleaning in the wound area with a soiled wipe and handling the dressing with soiled gloves could cause an infection. During an interview, on 8/5/2019 at 10:39 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #6 confirmed that if you touch a dressing or clean close to the wound with dirty gloves, the wound could get infected. CNA #6 stated, You should always stop and report the loose dressing to the nurse. During an interview on 8/7/2019 at 3:05 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #7/Treatment Nurse revealed that when CNA #5 pulled the dressing away from the wound with her soiled gloved hand, and wiped with a soiled wipe, it could have allowed bacteria into the wound area. RN #7 stated, This could cause the area to become infected. RN #7 stated, The CNAs should have made the nurse aware, so the dressing could be changed, but definitely not wipe into the wound area or touch the inside of the dressing with soiled gloves. During an interview, on 8/8/2019 at 1:50 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #5/Staff Development Nurse, confirmed that a CNA should not clean the area under a dressing at any time. RN #5 stated, Wiping in the area of a wound with a soiled wipe and handling the wound dressing with a dirty glove, is an infection control problem. RN stated, That's definitely a problem. During an interview, on 8/9/2019 at 11:46 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the CNA should not have cleaned in the area under a wound dressing and should not have touched the inside of a dressing. The DON stated the CNA should have notified the nurse that the wound dressing was coming off. Review of the Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #18 on 2/5/2019, with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Resident #47 During an Observation of a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube dressing change, with License Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, revealed LPN #2 washed her hands, pulled gloves out of her lab jacket pocket, and removed the old dressing. She cleansed the PEG area with soap and water. LPN #2 Left room to get more gloves. LPN #2 put gloves into her lab jacket pocket, washed her hands, applied gloves from out of pocket, and put on a new dressing to the PEG site. During an interview on 08/06/19 at 2:51 PM, LPN #2 confirmed she put the gloves in her pocket and didn't think about it. LPN #2 said that she should not have put the gloves in her pocket, because they can become contaminated by touching other things in her pocket. LPN #2 said she did not think about infection control. During an interview on 08/06/19 at 2:51 PM, RN # 5 confirmed that LPN #2 should not put gloves in her pocket, then use them for patient care. RN #5 said it could cause infection and LPN #2 did not follow the facility policy. A review of the facility's face sheet revealed the facility admitted Resident #47 on 8/02/2017, with diagnoses, which included Hypertension, Diabetese Mellitus and Seizure Disorder. Review of Resident #47's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/23/2019, revealed Resident #47 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Mississippi facilities.
  • • 36% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 13 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade D (49/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Bedford Of Newton's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Bedford Of Newton Staffed?

CMS rates BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Bedford Of Newton?

State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON during 2019 to 2024. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Bedford Of Newton?

BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BEDFORD CARE CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 55 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in NEWTON, Mississippi.

How Does Bedford Of Newton Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (36%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bedford Of Newton?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Bedford Of Newton Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Bedford Of Newton Stick Around?

BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Bedford Of Newton Ever Fined?

BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Bedford Of Newton on Any Federal Watch List?

BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF NEWTON is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.