BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Bedford Care Center of Picayune has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and poor quality of care. Ranking #148 out of 200 facilities in Mississippi places them in the bottom half of the state, and they are last among the three nursing homes in Pearl River County. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 2 in 2022 to 13 in 2024. While staffing is a relative strength with a rating of 4 out of 5 and a turnover rate of 48%, which is average, the facility has concerning RN coverage that is less than 77% of state facilities. Specific incidents include a failure to promptly notify a physician about a resident’s injuries, which led to a delay in treatment for a femoral fracture, indicating serious neglect in care. Overall, while the facility has decent staffing, the alarming trend in health and safety issues raises significant red flags for potential residents and their families.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Mississippi
- #148/200
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $8,617 in fines. Higher than 88% of Mississippi facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 24 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Mississippi. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Mississippi average (2.6)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record
May 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to store an O2 (Oxygen) nasal cannula and a nebulizer mask in a designated container and failed to change or discard a dis...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0699
(Tag F0699)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure triggers and resident specific int...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to discard expired stock medications for one (1) of five (5) medication storage areas reviewed. Nurses Station-Bu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide hand hygiene for residents prior to meals for one (1) of four (4) dining rooms observed. Dining Room C...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plan interventions related to oxygen therapy (Resident #3), pain management (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to discard expired foods and failed to label opened foods with a use-by date for one (1) of three (3) kitchen ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive, specifically a durable Power of Attorney (POA), was available and readily retri...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
6 deficiencies
6 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the Physician or the Resident Repr...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free f...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin within...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement care plan approaches or interve...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of accidents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to a r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0567
(Tag F0567)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had readily available and reasonable access to their personal funds, seven (7) days a week, for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #38
On 08/16/22 at 09:25 AM, in an interview with Resident #38, he stated that he has pain, especially in his right kne...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2019
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a care plan related to weight loss for one (1) for 18 resident care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Resident #18
Review of the Policy and Procedure of Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, Policy Statement: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent spread of infections. The Policy and P...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to submit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the 14 day requirements for two (2) of two (2) residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 6 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 18 deficiencies on record, including 6 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade F (13/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Bedford Of Picayune's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Bedford Of Picayune Staffed?
CMS rates BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Bedford Of Picayune?
State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE during 2019 to 2024. These included: 6 that caused actual resident harm, 11 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Bedford Of Picayune?
BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BEDFORD CARE CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 115 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in PICAYUNE, Mississippi.
How Does Bedford Of Picayune Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bedford Of Picayune?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Bedford Of Picayune Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Bedford Of Picayune Stick Around?
BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Bedford Of Picayune Ever Fined?
BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE has been fined $8,617 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,165. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Bedford Of Picayune on Any Federal Watch List?
BEDFORD CARE CENTER OF PICAYUNE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.