DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER

7805 SOUTHCREST PARKWAY, SOUTHAVEN, MS 38671 (662) 349-7500
For profit - Corporation 120 Beds ADVANCED HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
43/100
#107 of 200 in MS
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

DeSoto Healthcare Center has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance and raising some concerns for families considering this facility. It ranks #107 out of 200 nursing homes in Mississippi, placing it in the bottom half of state facilities, but it is the best option among 3 in De Soto County. Unfortunately, the facility's situation is worsening, with the number of issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 10 in 2024. Staffing is a relative strength, rated 4 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 39%, which is lower than the state average, suggesting that staff are more likely to stay and build relationships with residents. However, there are significant issues, including serious incidents where a resident was improperly transferred, leading to pain and a subsequent hospital visit for a fracture, and instances of inadequate hand hygiene in the kitchen, which could lead to infection risks.

Trust Score
D
43/100
In Mississippi
#107/200
Bottom 47%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Worse
4 → 10 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
39% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
○ Average
$9,318 in fines. Higher than 66% of Mississippi facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Mississippi. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 4 issues
2024: 10 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (39%)

    9 points below Mississippi average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Mississippi average (2.6)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 39%

Near Mississippi avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $9,318

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: ADVANCED HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Nov 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property for Resident #1 who was ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property for Resident #1 who was one (1) of three (3) sampled residents. Based on the facility's implementation of corrective actions taken on 10/11/24, this was determined to be Past Non-Compliance (PNC). Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation with revision date of 10/10/22 revealed, Policy: This facility's policy is to protect each resident's health, welfare, and rights by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. On 11/25/24 at 9:15 AM an interview with the Administrator (ADM) revealed that on the night shift (3-11) of 10/10/24, the Registered Nurse (RN) #1 notified the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) by phone that Resident #1's debit card was lost. The ADM revealed that the next morning, Social Worker (SW) talked to Resident #1, encouraged him to cancel his debit card and she assisted him with the phone call to the bank. When the SW spoke with the bank it was revealed that there had been recent charges on the resident's debit card that totaled $242.82 that was not made by the resident. The ADM confirmed that they immediately initiated an investigation and discovered that there were two clothing companies where the orders were placed. One of the clothing companies was able to give the name of the person who placed the order and the shipping address where the items would be delivered. ADM revealed that they concluded that it was an agency Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 who had used Resident #1's debit card to make the purchases and that it was her home address that matched the address where the items were to be shipped. ADM revealed that the first and only shift that the agency CNA #1 had worked at the facility was on 10/08/24, and she made those purchases using Resident #1's debit card. ADM revealed that he tried to call CNA #1 on two separate phone numbers they had on file, and was unable to reach her to obtain a statement. On 11/25/24 at 9:30 AM, an interview with Resident #1 revealed that he kept his debit card on his overbed table because he had been getting staff to use it to get him drinks and snacks out of the vending machine. He revealed that his debit card was lost one night in October. He revealed that staff looked all over for it and never found it. He stated that he didn't want his debit card turned off at first, but agreed to it the next morning and the SW came to his room and made the call to the bank for him. Resident #1 revealed that he had to verify with the bank representative the last purchases made on his debit card and found out that someone had made two transactions that totaled over two hundred dollars. Resident #1 revealed that they fired the aide who had used his debit card and he thought she had been arrested because the police came out and talked to him. Resident #1 revealed that the facility went out of their way to make things right and done way more than they should have to take care of this. On 11/25/24 at 10:00 AM, an interview with the DON, revealed that during the night shift on 10/10/24, RN #1 notified her and the ADM that they couldn't find Resident #1's debit card. She revealed that the ADM told them to report the debit card as lost or missing. She also revealed that RN #1 encouraged Resident #1 to cancel his debit card, but he declined due to the hassle. DON revealed that the next morning, SW encouraged Resident #1 to stop payment on the debit card, he agreed, and she assisted him. DON revealed that while the SW and Resident #1 were on the phone with the bank, Resident #1 had to confirm the last purchases made with the debit card and found that there were two charges that he had not made which totaled over two hundred dollars. DON revealed that the SW called the two companies and verified the name and shipping address of the person who had made the purchases and traced it to agency staff member CNA #1, who had worked on a previous night on the 3-11 shift. On 11/25/24 at 10:25 AM, an interview with SW revealed that Resident #1 told her that his debit card was lost. SW revealed that she encouraged him to cancel his debit card and request a new one. SW revealed that she assisted him with this and while on the phone with the bank, Resident #1 had to verify the last purchases he had made. SW revealed that they found out during the call to the bank, there were two other purchases on the card that he did not make which totaled over $200. She revealed that she reported this to ADM and DON, and they initiated an immediate investigation. SW revealed that she contacted the two companies from which the unapproved purchases were made, and one company verified the name and the shipping address of the person who made the purchase. She revealed that the shipping address matched the name and home address of an agency staff CNA who had worked the night before the card went missing. The SW revealed that both purchases were made on the same date and around the same time. On 11/25/24 at 2:20 PM, an interview with DON revealed that they tried to make sure they employed the best staff and that they had the right person for the job and stated, This CNA should never be allowed to work in a facility again with these vulnerable residents. She revealed that these residents had so little, and it angered her to find out that a staff member took from one of them. Record review of the facility Report to MSDH (Mississippi Department of Health) revealed under Investigation of Incident that on 10/10/24 at 9:28 PM, ADM and DON were notified by RN #1 that Resident #1's debit card was missing, they looked for it but could not find it. ADM instructed RN #1 to request that Resident #1 report the debit card missing to his bank. Resident stated, That is a hassle. The next morning (10/11/24) at approximately 9:22 AM, Resident #1 with the encouragement and assistance from the SW, contacted (Proper Name) bank to cancel his lost debit card and received notification that there were erroneous charges dated 10/09/24. These charges occurred before the debit card was lost on 10/10/24. Resident #1 with the assistance of SW contacted one of the companies where fraudulent orders were placed in order to locate the shipping address and the name of the individual placing the order. The address and name matched agency staff, CNA #1 with (Proper Name) Staffing Agency who worked on 10/08/24. This is the only shift that had been worked by this individual. She was immediately made a do not return to the facility. She has not and will not return. Record review of the typed Statement by SW, revealed that on 10/11/24, the social worker spoke with Resident #1 to confirm that his card was canceled and that a replacement card had been ordered. Resident #1 expressed the need for a phone to facilitate the cancellation process. At approximately 9:38 AM, this SW and Resident #1 contacted (Proper Name) Bank. The representative spoke with Resident #1 and requested verification of Resident #1's information which included confirming the last three transactions made. Resident #1 listed charges for a drink machine and (Proper Name) purchases but the representative indicated that these were not the most recent transactions. SW informed the representative that Resident #1's card was lost and they needed details about the transactions. The representative revealed that the latest charges included (Proper Name) for $37.40 and (Proper Name) for $205.42. Resident #1 confirmed that he had not made these purchases, his debit card was canceled and a new one ordered. The bank representative provided them with a contact number to dispute the unauthorized charges. The SW and Resident #1 contacted (Proper Name) Bank Dispute Department, provided information about the unauthorized transactions and Resident #1 was informed that he would receive a credit back to his account within ten (10) days. The representative emailed a bank statement copy to his email, detailing the date and time of the transactions. Staff members were notified of the situation. The SW and Resident #1 then reached out to (Proper Name) to obtain the name and address associated with the order. The (Proper Name) representative successfully provided the date order was placed, name on the order, and the shipping address. The information was relayed to ADM and DON. Signed by SW. Record review of the Nursing Home (Proper Name) Agency Orientation In-service Log revealed, Topic: I have been inserviced on the agency binder of my duties and responsibilities, abuse, neglect, and exploitation, emergency codes, resident's rights, infection control and prevention, HIPPA, and Lift Protocol. I understand if I have any questions, I am to ask a nursing home (proper name) employee. This orientation log was signed on 10/08/24 by agency staff CNA #1. Record review of Agency CNA's Shift Details form revealed that CNA #1 worked on 10/08/24. Her start time was 15:00 CDT (Central Daylight Time) and her End Time was 23:00 CDT (Central Daylight Time). The recorded time at the facility was 7 hours and 49 minutes. Record review of the facility Daily Route Sheet and Nursing Hours revealed that CNA #1 worked on 10/08/24 from 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift and that she was assigned to Resident #1. Record review of the Incident Report by the (Proper Name) Police Department dated 10/11/24 revealed that Officer (Proper Name) was dispatched to the facility to follow up on a report taken earlier that day. ADM reported that they discovered fraudulent charges to Resident #1's debit card before the card was lost. It seemed to be only a coincidence that the card was lost shortly after. ADM informed police officer that facility staff members contacted (Proper Name) to inquire about the fraudulent charges and a representative told them that the name on the order was (Proper Name) Agency CNA #1, and that it was being shipped to (Agency CNA's address). ADM informed police officer that they employed a CNA named (Proper Name) through a temp service on 10/08/24, the day before the fraudulent charges were made. ADM revealed that before this staff member worked, they obtained a copy of her driver's license, and the address matched the address that the items ordered were being shipped to. Record review of Resident #1's Account History Inquiry form revealed that transactions totaling $242.82 for (Proper Name) and (Proper Name) were made on 10/09/24 but did not process the bank until 10/10/24. This statement was verified by SW. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed an admission date of 12/18/18. Record review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/30/24 under Section C revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated that he was cognitively intact. The State Agency (SA) validated through interview with the Administrator and record reviews that the facility reported the incident to the State Department of Health, to Attorney General's Office, to the Local Police Department, and to the Staffing Agency (Proper Name) on 10/11/24 and they made her a Do Not Retain status. The final investigation report was submitted to the State Department of Health on 10/14/24. The SA validated through interview and record review with Administrator and DON that on 10/11/24, they conducted an immediate investigation and initiated a mandatory in-service with all staff on Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation with special emphasis on cash and credit cards. All residents who were under the care of CNA #1 were interviewed and there were no other reports of missing items or concerns. Updated process and in-serviced staff: Anytime a resident requests that facility staff take money/debit card (as in this instance) to the vending machine (or for any other reason) to make a purchase for them the staff is not to take the money/card. The staff will notify the front office or the charge nurse and one of those individuals will handle the resident request with a witness. This in-service was given to all current staff at the time of the event and has been added to new hire orientation for all new employees (of any type) going forward. This is in addition to our more generalized abuse/neglect/misappropriation training that is done for all staff at regular intervals and all new staff at orientation. The implementation of this process was discussed with all residents at the time of the event. All potential grievances (including potential misappropriation) are reported by the facility grievance officer twice daily at the facility standup and standdown meetings. The SA validated through interview with Administrator and Social Worker that on 10/11/24, the facility reimbursed Resident #1 for $242.82, the total amount of the unauthorized debit card purchases made by CNA #1. The SA validated through record review of Reimbursement of Credit Card Charges form, revealed that Resident #1 was given a check on 10/11/24 in the amount of $242.82, for reimbursement of charges made on his personal debit card. The SA validated through interview with Administrator and record review that an Emergency QA (Quality Assurance) Committee Meeting was held on 10/11/24 regarding fraudulent charges found on Resident #1's bank account. The facility reimbursed Resident #1 of all charges, and going forward, the front office or charge nurse is to be notified if a resident needs staff to assist them to use their cash or credit/debit cards to purchase items from the vending machine or store or make on-line purchases for them. Residents are questioned in resident council regarding any potential misappropriation issues. In addition to resident council and grievance program: QA department interviewing two residents per hall weekly for four (4) weeks, then two (2) residents monthly for 2 months then one (1) resident monthly going forward through the calendar year. This process is reviewed monthly in facility QA meeting. No issues have been reported. On 11/25/24 the SA validated facility actions taken on 10/11/24 and determined this was PNC.
Jul 2024 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0604 (Tag F0604)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physicians order for a bolster sheet that was being used to prevent a residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physicians order for a bolster sheet that was being used to prevent a resident from getting out of bed for one (1) of 27 residents on sample. Resident #81 Findings Include Review of the facility policy titled, Restraints with a revision date of 11/28/17 revealed . Restraint Order .orders for restraint should specify: the rationale (medical necessity) for the use of restraint, the type of restraint . An observation on 07/15/24 at 10:50 AM, revealed there was a concave mattress on Resident #81's bed and the resident was gone to dialysis. An interview on 7/16/24 at 9:00 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed Resident #81 had several falls and the facility had implemented several different measures to prevent them. She stated that the residents' mind has worsened, and she thinks she can still walk sometimes, especially if she wakes up at night. She revealed they had put her bed in the lowest position and used the concave mattress, because she would forget to use her call light. An interview on 7/16/24 at 3:00 PM, with the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed Resident #81 had several falls and they have ended up using the concave mattress and it has helped. Record review of Resident #81's physicians orders revealed there was no order for a Concave mattress or Bolster sheet. Record review of the Resident #81 care plans revealed a care plan that was initiated on 12/11/23 for Risk for Falls with interventions that included Bolster sheet to air mattress. An observation, interview and record review on 7/17/24 at 9:40 AM, with RN #1 and Licensed Practical/Quality Assurance Nurse (LPN/QA) #2 confirmed Resident #81 had a Bolster sheet on top of her air mattress and did not have an order. She stated that it appeared that it may have been implemented with the fall that occurred 6/8/24. LPN/QA #2 confirmed Resident #81 should have an order for the bolster sheet on her air mattress and that it does prevent her from getting out of bed. An interview on 7/17/24 at 10:12 AM, the DON confirmed Resident #81 did not have an order for the bolster sheet on her air mattress. She stated she was not aware they needed an order since they were using it to define the parameters of the bed. She stated the purpose of the bolster sheet is to prevent resident's from getting out of the bed. Record review of Resident #81's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility initially on 7/12/23 with medical diagnoses that included Osteomyelitis of Vertebra.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for one (1) of 26 residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for one (1) of 26 residents care plans reviewed. Resident #93 Findings Included: Record review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Plan of Care revised 10/10/22 revealed Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment . Record review of Resident #93's care plan, date initiated 4/11/24 revealed Focus: The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit .Interventions . Resident is usually extensive assistance x (times) 1 with bed mobility, toilet use, personal hygiene, and dressing . During an interview on 7/15/24 at 10:55 AM, an interview with Resident #93 revealed she had been at this facility about three (3) months. She revealed the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) gave her good baths but she was concerned about her teeth. Resident #93 revealed that the staff had brushed her teeth a few times since she had been here, but they had not brushed her teeth since 1 day last week. She stated, If I ask, they will sometimes do it, but if I don't ask, it doesn't get done. Resident #93 revealed that she knew that not brushing her teeth could lead to tooth decay and bad breath and she liked her teeth brushed every day. On 07/16/24 at 9:00 AM, an observation and interview with Resident #93 revealed she was sitting up in her wheelchair in her room drinking her coffee. She revealed that if someone would get her a toothbrush and toothpaste and set them up for her, she could brush her own teeth. She revealed that she had her own teeth and stated, I have good teeth but at this rate, they won't last much longer. On 07/16/24 at 9:05 AM, an observation revealed resident's poor oral hygiene with a yellow substance between her upper and lower teeth and gum line. On 07/16/24 at 1:30 PM an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, confirmed the yellow substance on Resident #93's upper and lower teeth and gum line and confirmed that her teeth had not been cleaned. She stated, Her mouth looks pretty rough. LPN #1 revealed that mouth care should be done every day and she would get it taken care of now. LPN #1 revealed that failure to complete daily oral care could lead to gingivitis, loss of appetite, and other issues. She also revealed that mouth care was included in daily personal hygiene and documented by the CNAs. On 07/16/24 at 1:35 PM, an interview with CNA #1 revealed that personal hygiene included mouth care and was supposed to be done every day. She revealed the CNAs helped residents brush their teeth, they rinsed their mouth and provided mouthwash for the residents. CNA #1 revealed she didn't get there until 8:00 AM today and that Resident #93's mouth care had not been done. On 07/17/24 at 9:20 AM, an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the CNAs were responsible for resident oral care. She revealed that personal hygiene included oral care and was included in Resident #93's care plan. The DON revealed the purpose of the comprehensive care plans was to ensure the staff knew how to take care of each resident to meet their individualized needs. She agreed Resident #93's ADL Care Plan was not implemented when the CNAs failed to ensure that she received daily oral care. Record review of Resident #93's admission Record revealed an admission date of 04/03/24 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia and Need for Assistance with Personal Care.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided daily as evidenced by a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided daily as evidenced by a resident did not receive daily oral care for one (1) of 26 residents reviewed. Resident #93. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL) revised 09/15/22 revealed Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines . 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . On 07/15/24 at 10:55 AM, an interview with Resident #93 revealed she was admitted to the facility about three (3) months ago. She revealed the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) gave her good baths, but she had a concern about her teeth not getting brushed. She revealed the CNAs had helped her brush her teeth a few times since she had been there and wasn't sure if they were supposed to help her with this. She stated, If I ask, they will sometimes do it, but if I don't ask, it doesn't get done. Resident #93 revealed that she brushed her teeth once or twice a day when she was at home. She revealed that she had used a wet washcloth and paper towels to clean her teeth a few times in the facility, but they didn't get her teeth clean. She revealed that she knew that poor oral care could cause tooth decay and bad breath and she would like her teeth to be brushed every day. On 7/16/24 at 9:00 AM an observation and interview with Resident #93 revealed she was sitting up in her wheelchair in her room drinking coffee. She revealed that the CNAs had not helped her brush her teeth since one day last week. She revealed that if they would get her a toothbrush and toothpaste and set up for her, she could brush her own teeth. Resident #93 revealed that she had asked staff several times to get her a toothbrush and toothpaste so she could brush her teeth and they told her that they would get someone to do it or they gave other excuses and never returned. Resident #93 stated, I guess they got busy or forgot about it. She also revealed that she had her own teeth and stated, I have good teeth but at this rate, they won't last much longer. On 7/16/24 at 9:05 AM, an observation revealed Resident #93 had poor oral hygiene as evidenced by a yellow substance between her upper and lower teeth and gum line. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 1:30 PM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 in Resident #93's room confirmed the yellow substance on Resident # 93's upper and lower teeth and gum line. LPN #1 stated Her mouth looks pretty rough. LPN #1 revealed that mouth care should be done every day, she confirmed that Resident #93's teeth had not been cleaned and that she would get it taken care of now. LPN #1 revealed that failure to provide daily oral care to this resident could lead to gingivitis, loss of appetite, tooth decay, and other issues. She revealed that CNAs were responsible for completing daily personal hygiene and it included oral care. On 7/16/24 at 1:35 PM, an interview with CNA #1 revealed personal hygiene included mouth care and was supposed to be provided every day. She revealed the CNAs helped residents brush their teeth, rinsed their mouth and provided mouthwash for the residents. CNA #1 revealed she didn't get here until 8:00 AM today and assumed the night shift CNA had taken care of Resident #93. CNA #1 looked at Resident #93's teeth and confirmed that her mouth care had not been done. She revealed that failure to provide mouth care could lead to gingivitis and other problems. On 07/17/24 at 9:20 AM, an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the CNAs were responsible for providing personal hygiene for all residents. She confirmed personal hygiene included oral care. She revealed that failing to provide oral care for Resident #93 was not healthy and agreed that it could lead to tooth decay, bad breath, and other health problems. She revealed mouth care was supposed to be done every day and as needed. The DON revealed the CNAs on night shift got some of the residents up before the day shift came in and the day shift CNAs got the rest up and stated, I hate she's fallen through the cracks. She revealed they would resolve this issue now and that she wanted all their residents taken care of. Record review of Resident #93's admission Record revealed an admission date of 04/03/24 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #93's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/09/24 under Section C revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated that she was cognitively intact. Section GG revealed she required partial to moderate assistance with oral hygiene.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, Resident Representative (RR) and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, Resident Representative (RR) and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to prevent the possibility of an accident as evidenced by a physician ordered medication being found in a resident's bed for one (1) of 27 sampled residents. Resident #52 Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration with a revision date of 6/8/23 revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines .#16. Observe the resident consumption of medication. An interview and observation on 07/15/24 at 11:22 AM, with the RR for Resident #52 revealed she was making her mother's bed and found a blue pill in the sheets. This observation revealed she was holding the blue pill. She stated she had called for the nurse. She stated this is not the first time she has found medicine in her mother's bed, but it has been a while. An observation and interview on 7/15/24 at 11:25 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 confirmed the blue pill found in Resident #52's bed was Levothyroxine150 micrograms (mcg). An observation at this time of the resident's medication cards confirmed this pill was Levothyroxine 150 mcg. She stated that it was supposed to have been given between 5-6 AM this morning. She stated the nurse should always stay with the resident to make sure the resident has swallowed all the medications. She stated she would make the Registered Nurse (RN) supervisor aware. An interview on 7/15/24 at 11:30 AM, with RN #1 confirmed the nurse giving the medications should always stay with the resident and make sure the resident has swallowed all medications. An interview on 07/16/24 03:11 PM, with the Director of Nurses (DON) confirmed the medication nurses should always stay with the resident until they had swallowed all medications. She stated the purpose was to make sure the resident took all of their medication, and that no other resident would have access to it. An interview on 7/16/24 at 8:50 PM, with LPN #5 revealed she was Resident #52's nurse on Sunday night 7/14/24 going into Monday morning 7/15/24 and confirmed she gave the resident her medicine while she was in her wheelchair. She stated she has only worked with this resident twice but was warned by other staff members that she tends to not swallow all her medications. She stated the purpose of staying with the resident to make sure they swallow the pills is to make sure they do not get choked on the medications, or that there are no medications left that other residents could find and take. An interview on 7/16/24 at 9:04 PM, with LPN #6 revealed she was Resident #52's nurse on Saturday night 7/13/24 going into Sunday morning 7/14/24 and she gave the resident her medication while she was sitting in her wheelchair. She revealed she always stays with her resident while they take their medicines to make sure they swallow it all. She stated she had been warned about this resident not always wanting to swallow her medicines, so she was aware of that possibility, but she stayed with her. She stated that the purpose of staying with the resident while they take their medicines is because its physicians orders, they get the medicines they need and to make sure no other resident gets them. Review of Resident #52's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Care Profile for Resident #52 revealed a physician order dated 10/11/23 for Levothyroxine TAB (tablet) 150 mcg Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day. Record review of Resident #52's July 2024, Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Levothyroxine 150 mcg was documented as given daily through 7/16/24.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possibility of cross contamination to food, as evidenced by failure to perform hand hygiene after ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possibility of cross contamination to food, as evidenced by failure to perform hand hygiene after picking up a soiled item off the floor during steam table temperature checks for one (1) of three (3) kitchen observations. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control with a revision date of 6/8/2023 revealed Policy: This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines . During an observation of the lunch meal steam table temperature checks on 7/17/2024 at 11:58 AM, Dietary Staff #1 dropped a pen on the floor. She retrieved the pen from the floor and continued to check and record the food temperatures without washing her hands. An interview with Dietary Staff #1, on 7/17/2024 at 12:08 PM, revealed she was nervous and should have stopped and washed her hands to prevent the spread of bacteria to the food. An interview with the Administrator, on 7/17/2024 at 12:36 PM, revealed Dietary Staff #1 should have got a new pen or washed her hands after retrieving the pen from the floor to continue temperature checks. He acknowledged bacteria could cross contaminate the food.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately submit staffing data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for two (2) of 2 quarters reviewe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately submit staffing data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for two (2) of 2 quarters reviewed. First and Second Quarters of 2024. Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy, Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff revised 10/12/22 revealed . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines . 7. The facility is responsible for submitting timely and accurate staffing data through the CMS (Centers for Medicaid/Medicare Services) Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system . Record review of the PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY (Fiscal Year) Quarter 2 2024 (January 1-March 31) revealed Excessively Low Weekend Staffing Triggered. Triggered =Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. Record review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report CASPER Report 1705D FY Quarter 1 (October 1 - December 31) revealed Excessively Low Weekend Staffing Triggered. Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. On 07/16/24 at 9:20 AM, an interview with the Administrator (ADM) revealed he was aware they triggered excessively low weekend staffing for January through March 31, 2024, and for the last quarter, October 1 through December 31, 2023. He revealed that he was unsure why they triggered low staffing because they had more than adequate staffing. He revealed their staff ratio was usually above 3.0. The ADM revealed the Payroll Coordinator was responsible for gathering the information and putting in the data for the PBJ and submitting it. He revealed they had been trying to figure out why they triggered low weekend staffing so they could get it fixed but they couldn't find the problem. He revealed the Payroll Coordinator had contacted CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) and they were looking into it. The ADM revealed there seemed to be glitches in the system because they had trouble printing out the PBJ Staffing Data Report after submitting their information. On 07/16/24 at 9:30 AM, an interview with the Payroll Coordinator revealed when she realized they triggered for excessively low weekend staffing, she contacted CMS by phone, and she hadn't heard back. She revealed after she submitted the payroll information, she was not able to run the PBJ Staffing Data Report for January 1 through March 31 due to glitches in the system. The Payroll Coordinator stated she double checked everything and confirmed that the information was submitted correctly but she was afraid it would trigger again because they didn't know how to fix it or why it triggered low staffing. She stated, We have more than enough staff. She revealed she enters agency staff hours manually, but all other direct care staff hours roll over to her directly from their payroll system. The Payroll Coordinator revealed she always compares the date in their payroll system and makes sure it is correct before she submits it. Record review of the Staffing Grid for the quarters that triggered for low weekend staffing revealed staffing in the facility was sufficient.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0638 (Tag F0638)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessment within the fourteen-day time frame for two (...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessment within the fourteen-day time frame for two (2) of 27 sampled residents. Resident #54 and #59 Findings Include: Record review of the facility policy titled MDS Assessments with a revision date of 6/9/2023 revealed Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate, and standardized assessment of each resident's functional capacity using the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual. Record review of the facility's MDS 3.0 NH (Nursing Home) Final Validation Report dated 7/11/2024 revealed a warning message for Resident #54 and Resident #59's Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/29/24 indicated, Assessment Completed Late: Z0500B (assessment completion date) is more than 14 days after A2300 (assessment reference date). Record review of Resident #54 and Resident #59's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 5/29/2024 revealed under section Z0500, Date RN (Registered Nurse) Assessment Coordinator signed assessment as complete indicated 07/11/2024. An interview with the MDS nurse on 7/17/2024 at 11:10 AM, confirmed Resident #54 and Resident #59's Quarterly MDS assessments were completed late. She revealed that she had made corrections to both assessments which caused some delay. The MDS nurse confirmed that both assessments should have been closed by 6/12/2024. She explained they follow the RAI procedure manual for guidance in completing the MDS. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 7/17/2024 at 11:21 AM, revealed her expectations were for the MDS Nurse to complete the MDS assessments within the designated time frame set forth by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #54 on 12/16/2022 with medical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of the admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #59 on 8/29/2023 with medical diagnosis of Alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia.
Jan 2024 2 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centere...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one (1) of 11 residents sampled, Resident #1. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, CNA # 2 and CNA #3 failed to follow the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan to use a mechanical lift for Resident #1 and transferred her during the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift on 12/28/23, manually transferring her twice and with the sit to stand lift once. Resident #1 began to display signs of pain on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift and was given an as needed Acetaminophen. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) ordered in-house X-rays on 12/29/23 due to continued pain. The in-house X-rays were negative for fractures, but it did note that Resident #1 was uncooperative during the X-rays. On 12/30/23, when the resident began guarding her lower right extremity, the NP ordered Resident #1 be sent to the hospital for assessment, evaluation, and X-rays. The X-rays on 12/30/23 revealed a closed nondisplaced fracture of medial condyle of right femur. Resident #1 was fitted with a right knee immobilizer and discharged back to the nursing home on [DATE]. Based on the facility's implementation of corrective actions on 12/30/23 - 1/2/24 taken prior to survey entrance on 1/23/24, this deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Comprehensive Plan of Care revised 10/10/2022 revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment . Record review of the ADL care plan Date Initiated 12/20/2023 Revised on 01/25/2024 revealed the Interventions: Transfer: The resident requires Total Lift with 2 staff assistance for transfers with medium sling. Date Initiated: 12/20/2023 Revision on 01/25/2024. Record review of the facility's incident report dated 01/01/2024 revealed that on 12/28/23, Resident #1 began to complain of pain in the Right Lower Extremity (RLE). She was assessed by nursing with no redness or swelling. Resident #1 was medicated with a standing order of Tylenol 650 MG for pain. On 12/29/23, Resident #1 still exhibited pain to the right knee and the Nurse Practitioner ordered a STAT X-ray to be done in the facility. This X-ray was negative for fractures. On 12/30/23, Resident #1 was still complaining of pain in the right knee. The Nurse Practitioner sent her to the emergency room for further evaluation and X-rays. The X-rays on 12/30/23 revealed a closed nondisplaced fracture of medial condyle of right femur. Resident #1 was fitted with a right knee immobilizer and discharged back to the nursing home on [DATE]. The facility began to conducted an investigation to determine how Resident #1 fracture occurred. Based on interviews with CNA #1, CNA #2 and CNA #3 transferred Resident #1 three (3) times and admitted to not using a Total Lift for those transfers. Record review on 1/26/24 of Resident #1's Certified Nurse Aide Standard Task: ADL-Transferring, Date initiated 10/11/2023 revealed that Resident #1 requires a Total Lift X2 (times two) Assist. On 1/29/24 at 12:25 PM, in an interview with the Administrator, revealed that he was notified about Resident #1's X-ray results from the hospital by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/30/23. We immediately began an investigation. He stated No, the Cans did not follow the care plan. Resident #1 requires a total lift for all transfers. There were 3 Cans that admitted to providing a manual transfer and a sit to stand lift on 12/28/23. They were suspended during the investigation and terminated after the investigation completed. He stated we began in-services immediately after being notified of the fracture. We had an emergency QA (Quality Assurance) meeting. There was a lift inservice and nursing staff had to demonstrate use of each lift. We use the Total lift and sit to stand lift. The other in-services were on abuse, neglect, resident rights, following the care plans. On 1/29/24 at 3:30 PM, interview with the Administrator revealed Resident #1 should be transferred with a total lift and 2 staff members. All three knew this and had been trained on lift use and admitted knowing the resident should have been transferred with a total lift and with 2 staff members. He stated he 3 CNAs did not follow the care plan. That information is on the door of each resident's closet, the kiosk on the wall for CNAs to read the plan of care for each resident and it is on the ADL care plan. On 1/29/24 at 2:15 PM, interview with the DON she stated that during the investigation, it was revealed that Resident #1 was transferred three times on 12/28/23, twice by manual transfer and once by the sit to stand lift. She stated that Resident #1 required a total lift with the assistance of 2 staff members for transfers. Three CNAs admitted to performing or assisting with transfers on Resident #1 that were not on the residents care plan. CNAs #1 admitted to transferring Resident #1 manually twice and using the sit to stand without any assistance of another staff member once on 12/28/23. CNAs #1 was a new hire. She stated that CNAs #2 told her, during training, that Resident #1 could be transferred by either the sit to stand lift or manually even though her plan of care had to use a total lift. The DON revealed We immediately began in-servicing staff on abuse, neglect, resident rights, following the plan of care and lifts. We reviewed the plan of care of each resident that require lifts for transfers to make sure the plan of care is what their most recent lift assessment has She stated No, they did not follow the care plan for Resident #1. She revealed that each resident that requires lift use has the lift type, number of staff needed, and sling size is on the kiosk where the CNAs' get their care plan for ADL's, it is on the care plan in the medical record and it is also on the closet door of each resident. She also confirmed that the three CNAs' involved had training on lifts and following the care plan in the last 8 months. On 2/1/24 at 9:10 AM, interview with CNAs #1 revealed that she was assigned to Resident #1 on 12/28/23. She stated that when in training and orientation A CNAs (name of CNAs #2) was training me and she told me that even though Resident #1 is supposed to be a total lift with 2 people, she can transfer with help manually or use the sit to stand lift. On her first transfer on 12/28/23, from the bed to the shower chair, (name of CNAs #2) helped me do a manual transfer. We were on each side of her. The bed was lowered down to the level of the shower chair. In the shower room, I transferred her from the shower chair to her wheelchair using a sit to stand lift with (Name of CNAs #3). Before my shift was over, I transferred her by myself manually back to bed. She stated you can find the plan of care on the kiosk. That would have how to each resident is transferred. It is also on each resident's closet. It has the lift, number of staff to do the transfer and the sling size. It is in the ADL care plan too. I knew she was a total lift with 2 people, but I had been told by another CNAs that Resident #1 can manually transfer so that is what I did. She revealed Yes, I had lift training during orientation. I had care plan training during orientation also. Interview with CNAs #2 on 1/29/24 at 2:30 PM revealed, When I was training CNAs #1, we did a manual lift on Resident #1 together. We were putting her in the shower chair from her wheelchair that time. She revealed that it is on resident closet doors, the kiosk and in the ADL care plan on how each resident is transferred. Interview with CNAs #3 on 1/29/24 at 2:40 PM revealed Resident #1 was not my resident that day. I was only helping CNAs #1 with her. (Name of CNAs #1) asked me to help her put Resident #1 on the shower chair. I said to (name of CNAs #1) that Resident #1 is supposed to be on a total lift for transfers. On her closet, it said total lift. We proceeded to manually transfer Resident #1. I got on 1 side of the bed and (name of CNAs #1) got on the other side of the bed. We went 1,2,3 and put Resident #1 on the shower chair manually. No, she didn't stand on her feet. We lifted her, nothing touched the floor after that (name of CNAs #1) took Resident #1 to the shower room. Yes, how to transfer a resident is on the closet door. It is also on the ADL's care plan. Yes, I was trained on lifts. I know it takes 2 people to use a lift. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility 1/2/2020 with diagnoses including Muscle Weakness generalized, other lack of coordination, unspecified dementia, Morbid Obesity, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 meaning she is unable to make daily decisions for herself. Validation of Past non-compliance The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews, record review of Progress Notes, Medical Doctor orders and emergency room documentation, on 12/29/23, Resident #1 was assessed with no injuries noted after complaints of pain to her right knee. The NP ordered a STAT X-ray with no fractures noted. The resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) on 12/30/23 by the NP related to continued complaints of pain in the right knee. X-rays at the ER revealed a closed nondisplaced fracture of medial condyle of right femur. She returned to the facility on [DATE] with a knee immobilizer on her right knee. The SA validated by interviews and record review the Director of Nurses began her investigation on 12/30/23 when notified of the fracture. She obtained written statements from staff in the facility beginning on 12/28/23 when Resident #1 began complaining of pain. There were three (3) Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) that admitted to performing 3 inappropriate transfers of Resident #1 on 12/28/23. The 3 CNAs' were suspended 12/29/23 pending investigation completion and then terminated on 1/3/24. The SA validated from record review and interviews, the Resident Representative (RR) was notified on 12/30/2023 and the State Agency (SA) was notified on 12/30/2023. The Attorney General office was notified when the CNAs' admitted to the inappropriate transfers. All CNAs' and nurses were in serviced starting 12/30/23 on following the individual care plan related to lift use, the facility policies on Lift Use, Abuse and Neglect, and Care Plans. This was validated by the SA from sampled staff being interviewed to confirm their attendance, knowledge of the training, observation of lift use and record review of the signed documents of the attendance by the staff. All nursing new hires will be in-serviced upon hire. The SA validated through interviews that all residents care plans, lift instructions, and the resident cards located on individual resident closet doors were audited to ensure correct and consistent information. Sampled residents care plans, lift instructions, resident cards located on individual resident closet doors were audited by the SA to confirm they had consistent and correct information. The SA validated through record review and interview that the facility held a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting on 1/2/24 to discuss the incident regarding 3 CNAs' failing to use the correct lift technique for Resident #1. The SA was able to validate the actions the facility took after the incident, beginning 12/30/23 and prior to SA entrance for survey on 1/23/24, involving Resident #1 and CNAs #1, CNAs #2 and CNAs #3 through record review, interviews, and observations.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, policy/procedure review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, policy/procedure review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (1) of 11 residents sampled, Resident #1. During the 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM shift on 12/28/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1, CNA #2 and CNA # 3 transferred Resident #1, using a manual transfer twice and the sit to stand lift once. Resident #1 began to display signs of pain on the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift and was given an as needed Acetaminophen. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) ordered in-house X-rays on 12/29/23 due to continued pain. The in-house X-rays were negative for fractures, but it did note that Resident #1 was uncooperative during the X-rays. On 12/30/23, when the resident began guarding her lower right extremity, the NP ordered that Resident #1 be sent to the hospital for assessment, evaluation, and X-rays. The X-rays on 12/30/23 revealed a closed nondisplaced fracture of medial condyle of right femur. Resident #1 was fitted with a right knee immobilizer and discharged back to the nursing home on [DATE]. Based on the facility's implementation of corrective actions on 12/30/23 - 1/2/24 taken prior to survey entrance on 1/23/24, this deficient practice was determined to be Past Non-Compliance. Findings include: Policy and procedure review of the facility's Safe Lifting Program last revised 9/22/22 revealed the Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure, and comfortable experience for the residents while keeping the employees safe in accordance with current standards and guidelines .Compliance Guidelines .10. Two staff members must be utilized the transferring residents with a mechanical lift .13. Staff members are expected to maintain compliance with safe handling/transfer practices .14. Resident lifting and transferring will be performed according to the resident's individual plan of care. Record review of the facility's incident report dated 01/01/2024 revealed that on 12/28/23, Resident #1 began to complain of pain in the right lower extremity (RLE). She was assessed by nursing with no redness or swelling. Resident #1 was medicated with a standing order of Tylenol 650 MG (milligrams) for pain. On 12/29/23, Resident #1 still exhibited pain to the right knee and the Nurse Practitioner ordered a STAT (immediate) X-ray to be done in the facility. This X-ray was negative for fractures. On 12/30/23, Resident #1 was still complaining of pain in the right knee. The Nurse Practitioner sent her to the emergency room for further evaluation and X-rays. The X-rays on 12/30/23 revealed a closed nondisplaced fracture of medial condyle of right femur. Resident #1 was fitted with a right knee immobilizer and discharged back to the nursing home on [DATE]. The facility began to conduct an investigation to determine how Resident #1's fracture occurred. Based on interviews with CNA #1, CNA #2 and CNA #3 transferred Resident #1 three (3) times and admitted to not using a Total Lift for those transfers. Record review of the ED (Emergency Department) Provider Notes dated 12/30/23 revealed, .Examination XR (x-ray) knee right AP and Lateral .Impression fracture of the distal medial right femoral metaphysis likely acute .Clinical Impression: Final diagnoses: Closed non-displaced fracture of medial condyle of right femur . Record review of Resident #1's Certified Nurse Aide Standard Task: ADL-Transferring, Date initiated 10/11/2023 revealed that Resident #1 requires a Total Lift X2 (times two) Assist. Record review of a Progress Note for Lift/transfer evaluation Effective Date 12/6/23 revealed Resident is not able or partially able to assist with transfers from bed to bed. Review of the Nurse Practitioner's (NP) Progress Notes: CPT (Amended) with Date of Service (DOS) being 12/29/2023 revealed that Resident #1 was seen by the NP due to c/o acute RLE (right lower extremity) pain and no reported injuries. The NP's Plan: obtain STAT 2 view x-ray of bilateral hip/pelvis/right knee/continue Tylenol. Record review of Progress Notes dated 12/30/2023 0900 written by a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed NP made aware of Xray results that showed no abnormality to R (right) knee. Res still continues to display s/s of increased pain. NP ordered for res (resident) to be sent to (name of hospital) ER for further eval (evaluation). RP aware. Record review of Progress Notes dated 12/30/2023 11:42 revealed transfer to (local emergency room) for evaluation on leg and thigh pain. Record review of Progress Notes dated 12/30/2023 17:16 revealed a call from the ER reporting Resident #1 has a right distal medial femoral fracture. Resident to return to facility with knee immobilizer this evening. Record review of Progress Notes dated 12/30/2023 18:45 revealed Resident #1 returned from the hospital with a knee immobilizer observed to R knee. Interview with the Administrator on 1/29/24 at 12:25 PM, revealed he was notified about Resident #1's X-ray results from the hospital by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/30/23. We immediately began an investigation. Resident #1 requires a total lift for all transfers. There were 3 CNA's that admitted to doing a manual transfer and a sit to stand lift on 12/28/23. They were suspended during the investigation and terminated after the was completed. He revealed that the DON contacted the State Agency (SA) and the Attorney General's (AG) office timely. He stated, We began in-services immediately after being notified of the fracture. We had an emergency QA (Quality Assurance) meeting. There was a lift inservice and nursing staff had to demonstrate use of each lift. We use the Total lift and sit to stand lift. The other in-services were on abuse, neglect, resident rights, and following the care plans. Interview with the Administrator on 1/29/24 at 3:30 PM, regarding the fracture of Resident #1 revealed, We were unsure of how the fracture happened. It was called in to licensure in the 2-hour time frame. We began investigating the fracture by backtracking who had cared for Resident #1 prior to the fracture and trying to find when she began having pain. The AG office was notified on 1/2/24 when we knew exactly what had happened after the interview, demonstrations and written statements by the three CNAs (CNA #1, CNA #2 and CNA #3). Resident #1 should be transferred with a total life and 2 staff members. All three knew this and had been trained on lift use and admitted knowing the resident should have been transferred with a total lift and with 2 staff members. Interview with the DON on 1/29/24 at 2:15 PM, she stated that during the investigation, it was revealed that Resident #1 was transferred three times on 12/28/23 twice by manual transfer and once by sit to stand lift. She stated that Resident #1 was a total lift with the assist of 2 staff members. Three CNAs were suspended, then their employment was terminated. All three admitted to performing or assisting with transfers on Resident #1 that were not on the resident's care plan. It was noted that late on 12/28/23 that Resident #1 was displaying signs of pain. A nurse assessed her and saw no signs of redness or swelling on her body. On 12/29/23, Resident #1 was still expressing signs of pain. The Nurse Practitioner (NP) ordered X-rays to be done STAT in house. The results did not show any fractures but did note that the resident was moving during the X-rays. On 12/30/23, the NP then ordered Resident #1 to be sent to the hospital for assessment and treatment because of continued pain. The X-rays from the hospital revealed a distal medial right femoral fracture. She returned to the facility with a knee immobilizer. I began the investigation when I got the X-ray results. During the investigation, we started looking at 12/28/23, the day she began to show signs of pain. The three CNAs involved were (names of CNA #1, CNA #2 and CNA #3). CNA #1 was the CNA assigned to Resident #1 on 12/28/23. CNA #1 admitted to transferring Resident #1 manually twice and using the sit to stand lift without any assistance of another staff member once on 12/28/23. CNA #1 was a new hire. She stated that CNA #2 told her, during training, that Resident #1 could be transferred by either the sit to stand lift or manually even though her plan of care had to use a total lift. CNA #3 admitted to assisting CNA #1 with a manual transfer of Resident #1 on 12/28/23. CNA #2 admitted to assisting CNA #1with a manual transfer of Resident #1 on 12/28/23. All 3 CNA's wrote and signed statements regarding what happened with Resident #1. They were suspended. They did return to the facility to demonstrate to the Quality Assurance (QA) team what had happened with Resident #1's transfers. Once the demonstration was completed, all three were terminated. She stated, We immediately began in-servicing staff on abuse, neglect, resident rights, following the plan of care and lifts. We did a check-off for staff and in-service on lifts. They were required to demonstrate using each lift. There was an emergency QA meeting. We reviewed the plan of care of each resident that require lifts for transfers to make sure the plan of care is what their most recent lift assessment has. She revealed that each resident that requires lift use has the lift type, number of staff needed, and sling size is on the kiosk where the CNAs get their care plan for ADL's, it is on the care plan in the medical record, and it is also on the closet door of each resident. She confirmed that she notified the State Agency (SA) within 2 hours of getting the X-ray results from the hospital. She stated the Attorney General (AG) office was notified of the incident and the admissions of each CNA. She also confirmed that the three CNAs involved had training on lifts and following the care plan in the last 8 months. Interview with the Nurse Practitioner on 1/26/24 at 9:45 AM, revealed that she saw Resident #1 on 12/27/23 and there were no issues. She was notified on 12/29/23 that the resident was guarding her right leg and moaning. She ordered STAT X-rays on 12/29/23 of the pelvic area, hips and lower extremities. That set of X-rays were done in the facility and it was noted on the X-rays that the resident was moving frequently during the X-rays. She ordered the resident be sent to the hospital on [DATE] when the staff stated she was continuing to display symptoms of pain. I saw her on 12/29/23 for acute pain in the right lower extremity. She would not let me extend the right lower extremity. I ordered X-rays to be done in house at that time. The results were negative for fracture but did state the resident was moving during the X-rays. On 12/30/23, she was still complaining of pain in the right lower extremity, so I had her sent to the hospital for better X-rays and further assessment. (Name of DON) began an investigation when the hospital X-rays revealed a fracture of the right femur. She returned from the hospital with a knee immobilizer on the right leg the same day. Interview with CNA #1 on 2/1/24 at 9:10 AM revealed that she was assigned to Resident #1 on 12/28/23. She stated that when in training and orientation (Proper name of CNA #2) was training me and she told me that even though Resident #1 is supposed to be a total lift with 2 people, she can transfer with help manually or use the sit to stand lift. On her first transfer on 12/28/23, from the bed to the shower chair, (name of CNA #2) helped me do a manual transfer. We were on each side of her. The bed was lowered down to the level of the shower chair. In the shower room, I transferred her from the shower chair to her wheelchair using a sit to stand lift with (Proper name of CNA #3). Resident #1 never complained of pain or showed signs of pain. She went to lunch, therapy and the beauty shop that day. Before my shift was over, I transferred her by myself manually back to bed. I lowered her bed to the level of her wheelchair seat and put her on her bed. She rubbed her leg but when I changed her, there was no swelling, bruising or redness noted. I did not ask for help when I did her last transfer. I was suspended when they were doing the investigation and then terminated after the investigation was complete. You can find the plan of care on the kiosk. Those are the computers on the walls on each hall. That would have how each resident is transferred. It is also on each resident's closet. It has the lift, number of staff to do the transfer and the sling size. It is in the ADL care plan too. I knew she was a total lift with 2 people, but I had been told by another CNA that Resident #1 can manually transfer so that is what I did. She revealed, I had lift training during orientation. I had care plan training during orientation also. Interview with CNA #2 on 1/29/24 at 2:30 PM revealed No, I did not tell CNA #1 to transfer Resident #1 manually during training. I told her she has to use the lift. I was on a different hall that day. Now, when I was training CNA #1, we did a manual lift on Resident #1 together. We were putting her in the shower chair from her wheelchair that time. She was unable to recall the date. She revealed that it is on resident closet doors, the kiosk and in the ADL care plan on how each resident is transferred. Interview with CNA #3 on 1/29/24 at 2:40 PM, revealed Resident #1 was not my resident that day. I was only helping CNA #1 with her. (Name of CNA #1) asked me to help her put Resident #1 on the shower chair. I said to (name of CNA #1) that Resident #1 is supposed to be on a total lift for transfers. On her closet, it said total lift. We proceeded to manually transfer Resident #1. I got on 1 side of the bed and (name of CNA #1) got on the other side of the bed. We went 1,2,3 and put Resident #1 on the shower chair manually. No, she didn't stand on her feet. We lifted her, nothing touched the floor after that (name of CNA #1) took Resident #1 to the shower room. How to transfer a resident is on the closet door. It is also on the ADL's care plan. I was trained on lifts. I know it takes 2 people to use a lift. Record review of Resident #1's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility 1/2/2020 with diagnoses including Muscle Weakness generalized, other lack of coordination, unspecified dementia, Morbid Obesity, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Record review of Resident #1 Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Section G Functional Status revealed Resident #1 required two person extensive physical assistance with transfers. Record review of Resident #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 meaning she is unable to make daily decisions for herself. Validation of Past non-compliance The State Agency (SA) validated through interviews, record review of Progress Notes, Medical Doctor orders and emergency room documentation, on 12/29/23, Resident #1 was assessed with no injuries noted after complaints of pain in her right knee. The NP ordered a STAT X-ray with no fractures noted. The resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) on 12/30/23 by the NP related to continued complaints of pain in the right knee. X-rays at the ER revealed a closed nondisplaced fracture of medial condyle of right femur. She returned to the facility on [DATE] with a knee immobilizer on her right knee. The SA validated by interviews and record review the Director of Nurses began her investigation on 12/30/23 when notified of the fracture. She obtained written statements from staff in the facility beginning on 12/28/23 when Resident #1 began complaining of pain. There were three (3) Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) that admitted to performing 3 inappropriate transfers of Resident #1 on 12/28/23. The 3 CNAs were suspended 12/29/23 pending investigation completion and then terminated on 1/3/24. The SA validated from record review and interviews, the Resident Representative (RR) was notified on 12/30/2023 and the State Agency (SA) was notified on 12/30/2023. The Attorney General office was notified when the CNA's admitted to the inappropriate transfers. All CNA's and nurses were in serviced starting 12/30/23 on following the individual care plan related to lift use, the facility policies on Lift Use, Abuse and Neglect, and Care Plans. This was validated by the SA from sampled staff being interviewed to confirm their attendance, knowledge of the training, observation of lift use and record review of the signed documents of the attendance by the staff. All nursing new hires will be in-serviced upon hire. The SA validated through interviews that all residents care plans, lift instructions, and the resident cards located on individual resident closet doors were audited to ensure correct and consistent information. Sampled residents care plans, lift instructions, resident cards located on individual resident closet doors were audited by the SA to confirm they had consistent and correct information. The SA validated through record review and interview that the facility held a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meeting on 1/2/24 to discuss the incident regarding 3 CNA's failing to use the correct lift technique for Resident #1. The SA was able to validate the actions the facility took after the incident, beginning 12/30/23 and prior to SA entrance for survey on 1/23/24, involving Resident #1 and CNA #1, CNA #2 and CNA #3 through record review, interviews, and observations.
Aug 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to follow their care plan for one (1) ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to follow their care plan for one (1) of four (4) residents sampled as evidenced by on 7/25/23, the care plan for Resident #1 for a urinary tract infection has an intervention to Monitor lab values as ordered. Resident #1 had a Complete Blood Count (CBC) and Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) ordered on 7/25/23 to be collected in 1 week. The CBC and BMP were collected on 7/26/23 without a Medical Doctor's (MD) order. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy/procedure for Comprehensive Care Plan revised on 10/10/2022 revealed, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified on the resident's comprehensive assessment. Record review of the Urinary Tract Infection Care Plan dated 7/25/23 revealed an approach .2. Monitor lab values as ordered . Record review of the July 2023 Physician's Telephone Orders revealed an order dated 7/25/23, ordered by the NP, .4. CBC, BMP in 1 week. Record review of the facility (Proper Name) lab work performed at the facility for July 26, 2023 revealed the name of Resident #1 with a specimen collected date of 7/26/23 and the test ordered as a CBC and BMP. There is a straight line drawn through that with ERROR written beside it. Record review of the facility's Lab Error Report revealed that the form is signed by the Nurse Practitioner (NP) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1. The Date of report: 07/26/2023 Date . of Error 07/26/23 are the dates of the error. It reads Person discovering error: family member inquired about lab draw site. The Date and time error discovered: 07/26/23. The form revealed Brief description of error and cause (s): Resident labs were drew before the ordered date . An interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) on 8/10/23 at 9:50 AM, revealed Yes, care plan approaches should be followed. An interview on 8/10/23 at 12:20 PM, with LPN #1 revealed she is the facility Quality Assurance (QA) nurse. She stated Resident #1 had an order for lab for a CBC and BMP. The order was to draw the lab in one (1) week. It was written on 7/25/23. I don't know who wrote it on the facility (proper name) lab log sheet. The order was signed off by (name of) LPN but someone wrote it on the log sheet to be drawn on 7/26/23. Interview with the NP on 8/10/23 at 2:00 PM revealed, No, I didn't order the lab drawn on 7/26/23. I wrote an order for lab work in one week. It was for a CBC and BMP. The order was written 7/25/23. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Diarrhea, Unspecified; Candidacies, Unspecified; Personal History of Urinary (tract) Infections; Hypertensive Heart and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure and Stage 1-4/ Unspecified Chronic Kidney Disease.; Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3 Unspecified; Vascular Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/11/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Status (BIMS) score of 6 which indicated Resident #1 was severely cognitively impaired. She requires assistance with making daily decisions.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0773 (Tag F0773)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to follow Medical Doctors (MD) orders ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to follow Medical Doctors (MD) orders for one (1) of four (4) residents sampled as evidenced by on 7/25/23, the Nurse Practitioner (NP) ordered lab work for a Complete Blood Count (CBC) and Basic Metabolic Profile (BMP) in one week for Resident #1. This lab was collected on 7/26/23 without an MD order. Findings include: Record review of the facility's policy/procedure for Physician Order Review with an effective date of 1/9/2015 revealed the PURPOSE: To maintain appropriate continuity in resident care. POLICY: Every licensed nurse shall ensure that the physician's orders for each resident has been carried out as intended . Record review of the facility's policy/procedure for Diagnostic Services: Lab tests and X-ray last revised on 11/28/2017 revealed the Procedure: Quality lab tests and radiology (i.e., x-ray, M.R.I. (Magnetic Resonance Imaging)) services only are performed upon medical order from the resident's physician. On 8/10/23 at 9:50 AM, an interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) revealed The NP ordered a CBC and BMP to be drawn in one week when she ordered the Augumentin and Diflucan on 7/25/23. We contract with a company for our lab work. The lab company came the next day, 7/26/23, and drew the CBC and BMP. I don't know why the lab was drawn a week early. On 8/10/23 at 12:20 PM, an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 revealed she is the facility Quality Assurance (QA) nurse. She stated Resident #1 had an order for lab for a CBC and BMP. The order was to draw the lab in 1 week. It was written on 7/25/23. I don't know who wrote it on the (proper name) lab log sheet. The order was signed off by (name of) LPN but someone wrote it on the log sheet to be drawn on 7/26/23. Someone also put a line through it and wrote error. They didn't initial or date when they drew the line. On 8/10/23 at 2:00 PM, an interview with the NP stated, No, I didn't order the lab drawn on 7/26/23. I wrote an order for lab work in one week. It was for a CBC and BMP. The order was written 7/25/23. Review of the MD's July 2023 orders revealed Resident #1 was diagnosed with a Urinary Tract Infection and Yeast on 7/25/23 by the NP. The orders were to 1. D/C (discontinue) Cephalexin, Colace, Miralax. 2. Augmentin 500 milligram (MG) by mouth (po) two times a day (BID) X 5 days. 3. Diflucan 200 MG po daily X 14 days. 4. CBC, BMP in 1 week. Record review of the Clinical Testing Requisition Form revealed the lab company is (proper name) Laboratory Services. The Date of Collection: 7/26/23 Time 8:15 The lab tests marked are Basic Metabolic Panel and CBC with Automated Differential. The (Proper Name) NP is the Ordering Physician and it is signed by a facility LPN. It is dated 7/25/23. Record review of the facility's Lab Error Report revealed that the form is signed by the NP and LPN #1. The Date of report: 07/26/2023 Date & Time of Error 07/26/23 are the dates of the error. It reads Person discovering error: family member inquired about lab draw site. The Date and time error discovered: 07/26/23. The form revealed Brief description of error and cause (s): Resident labs were drew before the ordered date. Record review of the (Proper Name) lab work performed at the facility for July 26, 2023, revealed the name of Resident #1 with a specimen collected date of 7/26/23 and the test ordered as a CBC and BMP. There is a straight line drawn through that with ERROR written beside it. Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Diarrhea, Unspecified; Candidacies, Unspecified; Personal History of Urinary (tract) Infections;.; Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3 Unspecified, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without Complications, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. Record Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for a Quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/11/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Status (BIMS) score of 6 which indicates severe cognitive impairment.
Apr 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store controlled medications in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments in locked refrigerators o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store controlled medications in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments in locked refrigerators of medication storage rooms for two (2) of two (2) medication storage rooms observed. Findings included: Record review of facility policy titled, Controlled Drug Management, dated 10/18/22 revealed, Policy: To ensure adequate control, dispensing, and accountability of all controlled substances in conformity with state and federal regulations . Security: When not in use, the controlled substances storage area on each resident care unit must be always kept double-locked and secure . Record review of facility letterhead written by the Director of Nursing (DON) and dated 4/19/23, revealed, At this time, (Proper name of facility) does not currently have a policy stating that the locked controlled medication storage box inside of the locked refrigerator, inside of the locked medication room must be affixed. An interview with the DON and observation of the facility medication storage rooms on 4/19/23 at 8:50 AM, revealed each of the two locked medication storage rooms contained a locked refrigerator with a locked narcotic box, but the locked narcotic boxes were not permanently affixed and were removable from the refrigerators. The DON confirmed the locked boxes were in locked refrigerators in locked medication rooms, but were not permanently affixed in place and could be removed from the refrigerators. An interview with the Administrator and observation of the facility medication storage rooms on 4/19/23 at 9:20 AM, confirmed the locked narcotic boxes in the locked refrigerators of the medication rooms were not permanently affixed as required by regulations, and could have been removed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #15 An interview on 04/16/23 at 05:25 PM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed she was the weekend supervisor and sta...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #15 An interview on 04/16/23 at 05:25 PM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed she was the weekend supervisor and stated that all meals were served in the residents' rooms on the weekends and stated, You know, I'm not sure why. An observation of the dining hall on 04/16/23 at 5:30 PM revealed no supper meals being served in the dining hall. An interview on 4/17/23 at 08:44 AM, with Resident #15 revealed she loved to eat in the dining room, the food was served hotter, and she stated, I would like to go to the dining room for at least one (1) meal on the weekend. Resident #15 revealed she does not know why she cannot eat in the dining room on the weekend, and they always brought her meals to the room. An interview on 4/17/23 at 02:30 PM, with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2 revealed that the supper meals Monday through Friday and all meals on the weekend were served in the resident's room. She stated that the facility did not have a big staff on the weekend, and they all must work together to get the meal trays passed. She revealed that the facility just recently started serving meals in the dining room again, following the end of the Covid-19 pandemic. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 4/17/23 at 2:40 PM, revealed she has been in this position since October 2021. She stated that the residents were not eating in the dining room when she entered the DON position due to Covid-19. She revealed that the residents prefer to eat off the dining room steam table so they can choose the foods they want. When the State Agent (SA) asked if the residents had been given a choice on whether they eat their food in their room or the dining room, she revealed she had not asked them. She stated that eating in the dining room was the Administrator's decision. An interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 4/17/23 at 2:50 PM, revealed they recently resumed eating in the dining room in October 2022 due to the Covid-19 pandemic. He stated they started with breakfast and then added lunch. He revealed that the facility casually asked the residents if they would like to resume eating in the dining room, and at the time, there was not a tremendous amount of interest. He revealed he could not swear that every resident was asked about their preference regarding where they ate their meals. He revealed with things changing so much with COVID-19, we just decided that eating in the rooms was best, and when we started eating breakfast and lunch in the dining room back in October 2022, we continued to have them eat their meals in their rooms for supper and all meals on weekends. When the SA asked the Administrator what the setback for residents would be with them not having a choice of where they ate their meals and socialized, the Administrator stated, I see what you mean. When the SA inquired if residents should have a choice the Administrator stated, yea, yea. Record review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Streptococcal Infection, unspecified, Urinary Tract Infection, site not specified, and Pneumonia, unspecified organism. Record review of Section C of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/28/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates Resident #15 is cognitively intact. Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide residents an opportunity to choose a dining location as evidenced by all evening and weekend meals being served in resident rooms, for one (1) of four (4) survey days. Resident #8 and Resident #15 Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights with no revision date revealed under, 5. Self-determination. The resident has the right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice, including but not limited to: a. The resident has a right to choose activities, schedules (including sleeping and waking times), health care and providers of health care services consistent with his or her interest, assessments, and plan of care and other applicable provisions of this part. b. The resident has the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. Resident #8 An observation on 04/16/23 at 5:45 PM, revealed no residents in the dining room for the supper meal. Meal carts were being sent out to the floor. An interview on 04/17/23 at 08:50 AM, with Resident #8 revealed we eat in our rooms on the weekends because the dining room is closed. He revealed he would much prefer to eat his meals in the dining room, but we just stay in our rooms. He revealed he was never given a choice regarding where he wanted to eat his meals. An interview on 04/17/23 at 5:05 PM, with the Administrator revealed he was not aware that any of the residents were voicing any issues about eating in their rooms. He revealed, he doesn't believe anyone was given a choice about their preference about continuing to eat their meals in their rooms on the weekends and at night and confirmed that he really didn't present it to the residents about the dining room being closed for meals on the weekend. He confirmed it should have been opened back up and we are opening it back up fully today. An interview on 04/18/23 at 09:11 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 revealed she was told a while back that the residents were not to eat in the dining room on the weekend. She revealed she let the Administrator know a couple of months ago that there are some residents that would like to go to the dining room on the weekends. She revealed they like to go to the dining room to eat and socialize. A review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Bipolar Disorder, and Anemia. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Section C-Cognitive Patterns, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/22/2023, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicates Resident #8 is cognitively intact.
Feb 2020 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident #22's Oxygen (O2) use, to include approach...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident #22's Oxygen (O2) use, to include approaches for the storage of Resident #36's O2 cannula and tubing when not in use and implement Resident #3's need for heel boots and/or pillows to prevent new pressure areas. This concern was identified for three (3) of 24 care plans reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's Intermediate Care Plan Policy, not dated, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that the intermediate care plans will be done as follows: As needed in an acute situation. Completed by the floor nurse at the time the situation occurs. Resolved when the situation is stable. Added to the long term plan by the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Nurse if the situation continues when the quarterly review is due. Review of the facility's Oxygen Policy, dated 3/1/2004, revealed oxygen use should be care planned and store the O2 cannula in a zip lock bag when not in use. Resident #22 Review of Resident #22's care plans in the paper chart and electronic medical record revealed there was no care plan for oxygen developed. An observation, on 2/25/2020 at 11:00 AM, revealed Resident #22's O2 cannula and tubing was draped across the O2 concentrator in her room. Resident #22 was not in the room at this time. Review of a Physician's Telephone Order, dated 2/23/2020, revealed an order for continuous Oxygen (O2) at two (2) liters (L) biprong nasal cannula (BNC) per concentrator or tank. Review of a Physician's Telephone Order, dated 2/25/2020, revealed an order to change continuous O2 to as needed (PRN) for O2 saturation (Sat) less than (<) 93%. An interview, on 2/27/2020 at 11:00 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #1, revealed Resident #22 had not used the O2 recently. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1/Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator, on 2/27/2020, at 10:05 AM, revealed LPN#1 confirmed a care plan for Resident #22's oxygen was not developed. LPN #1 stated MDS does the majority of care plans with the assessments and updates the care plans when the assessments are due. LPN#1 stated, I could not find one in here. It should have been developed when the order was taken. The purpose of a care plan is to know how to take care of our patients, to know what we need to do to take care of their needs and what their preferences are. On 2/27/2020, at 10:15 AM, during an interview with the Respiratory Therapist (RT), revealed she had taken the order for oxygen on 2/23/2020, and had checked and initialed the box Pt. Care Plan on the Physician's Telephone Orders. The RT stated I don't remember writing the care plan. We're supposed to update it in the hard chart and the computer when a new order is given. The purpose of a care plan is so we know the plan of care for that resident and follow the plan of care to make sure we are doing everything we can to take care of our residents. Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #22 was admitted by the facility, on 12/12/2019, with diagnoses which included Acute Bronchitis, Heart Failure, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Unspecified Escherichia Coli as the Cause of Diseases Classified Elsewhere. Resident #36 Review of Resident #36's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed the Problem/Need, dated 3/29/2018, for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), wheezing and cough. The approaches included the use of O2 as needed (PRN) at 2 LPM (Liters per minute) per tank or concentrator and monitor effectiveness. The care plan did not address the storage of the O2 cannula and tubing when not in use. On 2/25/2020 at 8:35 AM, an observation during the initial tour, revealed Resident #36's nasal cannula was draped over the O2 concentrator and there was no bag to put it in. An interview at this time with Resident #36 revealed she stated, I ain't seen a bag over there for a good minute. On 2/27/2020 at 10:35 AM, during an interview with the Care Plan Nurse, she stated MDS does a majority of the care plan revision when they are reviewed for the MDS process. The Care Plan Nurse said the resident's care plan was just reviewed due to having an MDS, and we should have caught the fact she had no change tubing orders during the care plan review and we didn't. Resident #3 Review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 11/11/2014, revealed the Problem/Need for Pressure Ulcer risk related to (r/t) limited mobility, impaired cognition and incontinence. The Goal & Target Date: Will develop no new pressure areas thru (through) 5/19/2020. The approaches included: Heel Well boots to BLE (Bilateral Lower Extremities) at all times. If unable to keep heel well boots in place, position pillow in between resident's feet to provide pressure relief, dated 1/13/2019. Further review of the care plan revealed the Problem/Need, dated 10/15/2015, for Smart Chart - Schedule with the included approaches: Pressure relief boot in while in bed. On 2/25/2020 at 8:40 AM, an observation during the initial tour revealed Resident #3 was lying in his bed without his heel boots on. The boots were sitting in his Geri-chair in the corner. On 02/25/20 at 2:49 PM, an observation revealed Resident #3 was lying in the bed with his feet resting on the footboard. Resident #3 was laying diagonally in bed, with his head at one corner at the head of the bed and the his feet in the corner on the opposite side at the foot of the bed (catty-cornered) with his pillow in the floor. His heel boots were sitting on his Geri-chair in the corner. On, 2/26/2020 at 8:05 AM, Resident #3 was observed lying in the bed without his heel boots on and there was no pillow between his feet as care planned. On, 2/26/2020 at 2:20 PM, Resident #3 was lying in the bed without his heels boots on and there was no pillow between his feet for positioning. On, 2/26/2020 at 2:30 PM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, He should either have the heel boots on or the pillow between his feet. He is resistive to care sometimes. On 2/27/2020 at 10:35 AM, an interview revealed LPN #1/Care Plan Nurse, stated, MDS does a majority of the care plan revision when they are reviewed for the MDS process; however, the nurses and department heads are to update the care plan with the new orders and behavior. We just had a care plan review for him. Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #3 was admitted by the facility, on 8/14/2014, with diagnoses which included Adult Failure to Thrive, Unspecified Dementia without behavioral disturbance, Anemia, Functional Quadriplegia, and Blindness, one eye, low vision other eye.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of infection during the medication administration observations for one (1) of six ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of infection during the medication administration observations for one (1) of six (6) residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility's Employee Hand Hygiene Policy, not dated, revealed hand hygiene is required before and after direct resident contact and after handling soiled equipment or utensils. Review of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program policy, dated 11/13/2017 revealed hand hygiene protocol includes all staff shall wash their hands when after handling contaminated objects. On, 2/26/2020 at 9:10 AM, an observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 administering medications to Resident #29 revealed all medications were given except the Allegra. After administering the medications, LPN #3 went to the [NAME] Medication Storage Room, opening the door, touching the door knob, pulling open a drawer and going through all of the medication cards looking for the Allegra. After LPN #3 did not find the Allegra in the [NAME] Medication Storage Room, she went to the East Medication Storage Room and opened the door, touching the door knob, opening the drawer and going through the cards of medications and again not finding the Allegra. While LPN #3 was walking back to the [NAME] Hall another nurse alerted LPN #3 that she found the Allegra. LPN #3 then returned to the medication cart and placed an Allegra pill in a medication cup, and returned to Resident #29's room and administered the medication. LPN #3 did not use the anti-bacterial gel or wash her hands after looking for the Allegra in the storage rooms, after touching door knobs, drawer pulls and many medication cards before administering the medication. On, 2/26/2020 at 9:20 AM, an interview with LPN #3 confirmed she did not wash her hands or use the anti-bacterial gel after going to the East and [NAME] Medication Storage Rooms and before administering the Allegra to Resident #29. LPN #3 confirmed her hands would be contaminated and could cause the spread of infection. On, 02/26/2020 at 10:15 AM, an interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed LPN #3 should have used the hand gel or washed her hands after going to the [NAME] and East Medication Rooms to look for a medication. The ADON revealed LPN #3 contaminated her hands touching the door knobs and drawer pulls.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to store the resident's oxygen cannula and tubing in a manner to prevent the po...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to store the resident's oxygen cannula and tubing in a manner to prevent the possibility for infection or cross contamination for two (2) of three (3) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, Resident #22 and #36. Findings include: Review of the facility's Oxygen Policy, dated March 1, 2004, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that oxygen will be utilized included: With specific physician's order. Date the tubing and the humidifier. Document the tubing change on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) (Tubing is to be changed weekly). Care plan the oxygen usage. Store the Oxygen cannulas in a ziplock bag when not in use. Resident #22 On 2/25/2020 at 11:00 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, an observation revealed Resident #22's oxygen (O2) tubing was draped across the oxygen concentrator in the resident's room. There was no date on the tubing or humidifier bottle. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was called into the room and confirmed there was no date on the tubing and that it was not stored properly. LPN#2 reported the tubing should be labeled with the date it was placed and in a bag so nothing is dropping on the floor. It's normally changed every Saturday. LPN #2 stated, We don't want to cross contaminate anything, get germs or anything like that. Review of a Physician's Telephone Order, dated 2/23/2020, revealed an order for continuous Oxygen (O2) at two (2) liters (L) biprong nasal cannula (BNC) per concentrator or tank. Review of a Physician's Telephone Order, dated 2/25/2020, revealed an order to change continuous O2 to as needed (PRN) for O2 saturation (Sat) less than (<) 93%. Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #22 was admitted by the facility, on 12/12/2019, with diagnoses which included Acute Bronchitis, Heart Failure, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Unspecified Escherichia Coli as the Cause of Diseases Classified Elsewhere. Resident #36 On 02/25/20 at 8:35 AM, an observation, during the initial tour, revealed Resident #36's O2 nasal cannula was draped over the O2 concentrator and there was no bag to store it in. Resident #36 was sitting at her bedside, and an interview with her at this time revealed she stated, I ain't seen a bag over there for a good minute. An observation, on 2/25/2020 at 11:30 AM, revealed Resident #36's nasal cannula was now in a ziplock bag, dated 2/22/2020. Review of Resident #22's February 2020 Physician's Orders revealed an order, dated 9/30/2019, for O2 PRN at 2 LPM (Liters per minute) per tank or concentrator r/t (related to) SOB and COPD (Shortness of Breath and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. On, 2/25/2020 at 11:40 AM, an interview with the Respiratory Therapist (RT) regarding Resident #36's O2 cannula and tubing observed in a ziplock bag now, revealed she stated, I saw that her oxygen cannula was draped over her concentrator in her room, and they are supposed to all be bagged. So, I went to central supply and got a bag and attached it to the concentrator for her. The RT stated, I guess I just dated it for when I knew it should have been changed. They change them on the night shift on Sunday nights. An interview, on 2/26/2020 at 3:30 PM, revealed the Director of Nursing (DON), stated she had looked all through her chart, and there is no order for them to sign when they change out the oxygen tubing, and it is not on the care plan. So I guess they just know to do it. Review of Resident #36's February 2020 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed there were no orders or documentation for changing/dating the O2 cannula and tubing. Review of the Face Sheet revealed Resident #36 was admitted by the facility, on 3/29/2020, with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Unspecified Lung, Heart Failure, Cough, and Wheezing.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 39% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 17 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 43/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Desoto Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Desoto Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Desoto Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2020 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 14 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Desoto Healthcare Center?

DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ADVANCED HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 93 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in SOUTHAVEN, Mississippi.

How Does Desoto Healthcare Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Desoto Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Desoto Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Desoto Healthcare Center Stick Around?

DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Desoto Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $9,318 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,172. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Desoto Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.