DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
DeSoto Healthcare Center has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance and raising some concerns for families considering this facility. It ranks #107 out of 200 nursing homes in Mississippi, placing it in the bottom half of state facilities, but it is the best option among 3 in De Soto County. Unfortunately, the facility's situation is worsening, with the number of issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 10 in 2024. Staffing is a relative strength, rated 4 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 39%, which is lower than the state average, suggesting that staff are more likely to stay and build relationships with residents. However, there are significant issues, including serious incidents where a resident was improperly transferred, leading to pain and a subsequent hospital visit for a fracture, and instances of inadequate hand hygiene in the kitchen, which could lead to infection risks.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Mississippi
- #107/200
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 39% turnover. Near Mississippi's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $9,318 in fines. Higher than 66% of Mississippi facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Mississippi. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (39%)
9 points below Mississippi average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Mississippi average (2.6)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Mississippi avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on staff and resident interviews, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of property for Resident #1 who was ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a physicians order for a bolster sheet that was being used to prevent a residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan for one (1) of 26 residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided daily as evidenced by a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, Resident Representative (RR) and staff interview, record review and facility policy review the facility fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the possibility of cross contamination to food, as evidenced by failure to perform hand hygiene after ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately submit staffing data into the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system for two (2) of 2 quarters reviewe...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0638
(Tag F0638)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) resident assessment within the fourteen-day time frame for two (...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive person-centere...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, policy/procedure review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequat...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to follow their care plan for one (1) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0773
(Tag F0773)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, record review and policy/procedure review, the facility failed to follow Medical Doctors (MD) orders ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store controlled medications in separately locked, permanently affixed compartments in locked refrigerators o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Resident #15
An interview on 04/16/23 at 05:25 PM, with Registered Nurse (RN) #1 revealed she was the weekend supervisor and sta...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2020
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan for Resident #22's Oxygen (O2) use, to include approach...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of infection during the medication administration observations for one (1) of six ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to store the resident's oxygen cannula and tubing in a manner to prevent the po...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 39% turnover. Below Mississippi's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 17 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Desoto Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Mississippi, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Desoto Healthcare Center Staffed?
CMS rates DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the Mississippi average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Desoto Healthcare Center?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2020 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 14 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Desoto Healthcare Center?
DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by ADVANCED HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 93 residents (about 78% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in SOUTHAVEN, Mississippi.
How Does Desoto Healthcare Center Compare to Other Mississippi Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Mississippi, DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Desoto Healthcare Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Desoto Healthcare Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Mississippi. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Desoto Healthcare Center Stick Around?
DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for Mississippi nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Desoto Healthcare Center Ever Fined?
DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $9,318 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Mississippi average of $33,172. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Desoto Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?
DESOTO HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.