CARROLL HOUSE

307 GRAND, CARROLLTON, MO 64633 (660) 542-1599
For profit - Corporation 63 Beds JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
3/100
#237 of 479 in MO
Last Inspection: May 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Carroll House has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's overall quality and care. It ranks #237 out of 479 nursing homes in Missouri, placing it in the top half, but it is #2 out of 2 in Carroll County, meaning only one local option is worse. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 11 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, but it still has concerning elements, such as $113,960 in fines, which is higher than 94% of Missouri facilities, indicating ongoing compliance problems. Staffing is rated 2 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 63%, which is average, but there is less RN coverage than 91% of state facilities, meaning residents may not receive the highest level of care. Specific incidents of concern include a staff member's physical abuse leading to a resident's fracture and failures in allowing residents to make confidential calls to report abuse, as well as sanitation issues in food storage and preparation areas. Overall, while there are some improvements, families should weigh both the strengths and weaknesses before making a decision.

Trust Score
F
3/100
In Missouri
#237/479
Top 49%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
11 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
63% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$113,960 in fines. Higher than 66% of Missouri facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 9 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Missouri. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
26 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 11 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Near Missouri average (2.5)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 63%

17pts above Missouri avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $113,960

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (63%)

15 points above Missouri average of 48%

The Ugly 26 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Jul 2025 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect two resident's (Resident #18 and Resident #7)...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect two resident's (Resident #18 and Resident #7) right to be free from physical abuse. On 6/15/25 LPN A followed Resident #18 into an unoccupied resident room rolled him/her out of the bed onto the floor multiple times and LPN A walked the resident backwards which resulted in the resident falling and sustaining a fracture of the right tibial plateau (a break in the top portion of the shinbone near the knee joint, that often occurs due to high-energy impacts such as falls). The resident was sent to the local hospital and transferred to another hospital for surgical evaluation. In addition, staff failed to protect Resident #7's right to be free from abuse when Resident #27 hit him/her on the back of the head. The facility census was 56. The Administrator was notified on 7/11/2025 at 2:30P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 6/15/2025. The IJ was removed on 7/14/2025 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Review of the facility's undated Abuse and Neglect policy showed:- Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse also includes deprivation by an individual including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental, or physical condition cause harm, pain or mental anguish. - Corporal punishment, which is physical punishment, is used as a means to correct or control behavior. - Convivence is defined as the result of any action that has the effect of altering a residents behavior. that is not in the residents best interest. - Manual method means to hold or limit a residents voluntarily movement by using body contact as a method of physical restraint. - Mistreatment means inappropriate treatment of a resident. - Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect and corporal punishment of any type by anyone. -The resident has the right to be free from abuse including freedom from involuntarily seclusion and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the residents medical symptoms. Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights policy showed:-Residents have the right to be free from all abuse;-Residents shall not be subjected to physical, sexual, or emotional injury or harm.-Residents have a right to care which maintains or enhances the quality of life.Review of the facility's Person-Centered Interventions Behavior Management Program, dated 2022, includes:- When addressing a resident in crisis approach the person with a calm demeanor, avoid getting into a power struggle, utilize empathy and try to understand the residents point of view, respect the residents personal space and stand a little further back than arms reach (if you are too close to the person in crisis, then he/she may believe that you are being aggressive and that could further intensify the escalation of the event, Keep your hands to your side so the resident can see you have nothing you will use against them.- Person Centered Interventions includes guidance for a 2 to 3 person and did not include a physical de-escalation technique that could be used by only one staff member.1. Review of Resident #18's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 05/21/25, showed:-No cognitive impairment;-The resident had delusions;-The resident received antipsychotics (a class of medications primarily used to treat mental health disorders) daily;-Diagnoses included, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and depression.Review of the resident's care plan, dated 05/29/25, showed:-The resident is at risk for falls;-The resident has behaviors;-Staff are directed to maintain a safe environment.Review of the nurse progress notes showed:-06/15/2025 at 04:00 A.M., the resident came to nurses station became verbally aggressive to LPN A. The resident said he/she will sleep where he/she chooses and went to room that was not the resident's room. LPN A went to the other room where the resident was in bed with the covers pulled over his/her head and pulled the covers down to verify it was the resident. The resident sat up in the bed and started grabbing, punching and scratching LPN A. LPN A utilized PCI technique, securing the resident's arms and lowering the resident to the floor onto his/her knees as the resident was kicking and screaming;-06/15/25 at 04:15 A.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) went to the resident's room and the resident said his/her right knee hurt. The resident's knee was swollen; -06/15/25 at 05:31 A.M., the resident was sent to the hospital;-06/15/2025 at 08:17 A.M., the resident's guardian called and said resident was being sent to another hospital due to a fractured tibial plateau;-06/18/2025 at 05:47 P.M., the resident was re-admitted to the facility with diagnosis of right tibial plateau fracture.Review of the facility's Event Investigation dated, 06/15/25, showed:-At approximately 04:00 A.M., the resident became physically aggressive toward LPN A;-The resident initiated the altercation by pulling LPN A's hair and punching and scratching LPN A's head and arms;- LPN A implemented PCI technique and brought the resident safely to his/her knees to manage the aggression;- During this time the resident continued to resist by kicking his/her legs; -Certified Medication Technician (CMT) C and Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) A assisted the resident to bed. Observations and interviews with Resident #18 on 07/01/25 at 09:35 A.M. and 7/2/25 at 10:00A.M., showed: -The resident sat in a wheelchair with a brace in place to his/her right leg;-The resident said LPN A had got into it with him/her and broke his/her leg;-The resident said he/she was not usually in a wheelchair, but he/she had to be until the fracture is healed;-The resident said his/her right knee hurts, but pain medications help; -The night before the altercation with staff he/she had slept in a spare room, because his/her roommate snored;-He/she thought it was okay to sleep in another room;-On 06/15/25 at around 04:00 A.M., he/she walked to the empty room and LPN A followed him/her into the empty room;-LPN A told the resident he/she needed to get back into his/her bed;-LPN A went around the bed and started pulling up the sheets that the resident was laying on top of;-LPN A pulled the sheets up and rolled the resident out of bed and he/she got back into the bed and LPN A did it again multiple times; -The last time LPN A rolled him/her off the bed he/she got up and sat up on the bed and LPN A got in his/her face so he/she started punching and scratching LPN A;- He/she said, I should not have done that, but LPN A got in my face and All I wanted to do was sleep;-LPN A went to get CMT C and CNA A, because he/she was not able to stand up and could not put any weight on his/her right foot; - CMT C and CNA A helped him/her back to his/her room and into bed because his/her knees hurt; -He/She went to the hospital for a few days;-The hospital told resident he/she had a broken knee cap;- LPN A apologized and said he/she did not know she hurt him/her; - He/she is afraid of LPN A and a LPN A was still working at the facility. During an interview on 07/02/25 at 01:34 P.M., LPN A said:-On 06/14/25 the resident said he/she wanted to be moved to 400 hall and off the 200 halls, because the resident's roommate snored; -The resident went to an empty room and laid down;-The administrator told LPN A to get the resident to sleep in his/her own bed;-The administrator told LPN A not to let the resident sleep in another bed again;-On 06/15/25 at around 04:00 A.M., the resident came to the nurses station holding a pillow and said he/she could not sleep and he/she started down the hall to an empty room;-The resident went into an empty room and LPN A followed the resident;-The resident got in bed and covered up his/her head;-LPN A took the cover off the resident's head and told the resident he/she had to go back to the other room, because the administrator said he/she needed to sleep in his/her own room;-The resident stood up and started hitting LPN A;-The resident stepped toward LPN A and LPN A grabbed both of the residents' wrists and put them behind his/her back;-LPN A was facing the resident and walked the resident backwards toward the closed bathroom door;-When the resident and LPN A got to the closed bathroom door the resident went down to the floor and hit his/her knees and then the resident said ouch and that his/her knee hurt;-LPN A said he/she did not remember exactly how the resident got down to his/her knees;-The resident did not specify which knee was hurt at this time;-He/She did not pull the covers up and roll the resident out of the bed on to the floor at any time;-CNA A came down to the resident's room, because he/she said he/she heard some noise and the resident was setting on the floor at this time with his/her legs out in front of him/her.-CMT C came to the room and CNA A and CMT C assisted the resident back to bed;-The resident was complaining of knee pain;-The ADON had arrived at the facility and came to assess the resident;-He/She did not intentionally hurt the resident;-He/She did not want the resident to hurt himself/herself or others;-He/She should have left the room to get help and not try to de-escalate the resident alone;-The resident had a right to be safe at the facility. During an interview on 07/02/25 at 02:30 P.M., the Administrator said:-LPN A called the night that the incident happened and said the staff had dealt with the behavior;-He/She told LPN A to try to keep the resident in his/her own bed because that was the resident's bed;-LPN A said the resident had been up at the nurse's desk throughout the night;-The resident went into an empty room and LPN A followed/her;-The resident got in the room before LPN A did and had been covered up from head to toe;-LPN A took the covers down from the resident's head and the resident jumped up and went toward LPN A;-The resident started hitting/smacking LPN A;-LPN A said she used PCI training, but LPN A did not give any details;-LPN A said he/she got the resident to calm down by using PCI training;-LPN A said the resident fell down while the PCI technique was being administered and the resident complained of knee pain; -He/She did not feel this was abuse;-LPN A tried to keep the resident from harming himself/herself or others;-It was an unfortunate accident with no intent of abuse;-The resident had the right to be safe and free from accidents.During an interview on 07/02/25 at 03:47 P.M., CNA A said:-On 06/15/25 at around 04:00 A.M., LPN A did not call for help while he/she was in the resident's room;-He/She went to the resident's room, because he/she heard a sound like a trash can fell over;-When he/she got the resident's room the resident was sitting on the floor in front of the bed;-He/She has not seen LPN A be rude or rough with the residents;-The resident can be combative at times.During an interview on 07/02/25 at 04:12 P.M., CMT C said:-On 06/15/25 at around 04:00 A.M., LPN A did not call for help while he/she was in the resident's room;-CNA C told him/her to come to the resident's room;-The resident was sitting on the floor next to the bed;-The resident said LPN A hurt him/her;-He/she did not report the incident to anyone;-He/She had not seen LPN A be rude or rough with the residents;-The resident can be combative at times;-After CMT C entered the resident's room the resident told him/her LPN A hurt him/her;-The resident did not say how LPN A hurt him/her.During an interview on 07/02/25 at 04:43 P.M., the resident's physician said:-He was aware of the situation leading up to the fall;-The resident was combative with cares;-The resident was sent to the hospital for knee pain and found to have a right tibial plateau fracture.During an interview on 07/02/25 at 04:55 P.M., the resident's guardian said:-She was aware of the of situation;-The resident was combative with cares;-The facility did not report the resident was in pain;-She expects the resident to be safe and pain free.During an interview on 6/27/25 at 11:30 and 7/10/25 at 2:18P.M. the Ombudsman said:-The resident told her a staff member broke his/her knee;-The resident said he/she went to the hospital;-The resident did not say he/she was in pain at the time of the incident.2. Review Resident #7's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed:-Moderate cognitive impairment;-Diagnoses included: stroke, dementia and seizure disorder.Review of the resident's care plan, updated 06/22/25, showed staff educated the resident on not moving other residents' wheelchairs and to ask for staff assistance.Review of Resident #27's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Verbal behaviors directed toward others;-Independent with the use of a wheelchair for mobility;-Diagnosis included, multiple sclerosis, thyroid disorder and high cholesterol.Review of the resident's care plan, dated 06/27/25, showed:-Used a wheelchair for mobility;-Impaired decision making.Review of the facility's investigation, dated 06/22/25, showed:-Resident #7 asked Resident #27 to move so he/she could get around him/her;-Both residents sat in wheelchairs;-Resident #7 moved Resident #27's wheelchair and went around him/her in the hall;-Resident #27 hit resident #7 with an open hand in the back of the head.Review of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B written statement, dated 06/22/25, showed:-He/She sat at the nurses desk;-He/She observed Resident #7 go around Resident #27 in the hall;-Resident #27 reached out and slapped resident #7 with an open hand on the back of the head;-Resident #27 told Resident #7 to not come around him/her on this hall.Review of Resident #27 nurse's notes, dated 6/22/25 at 06:30 P.M., showed:-LPN B witnessed Resident #27 reach out and slap Resident #7 in the back of the head;- Resident #27 told Resident #7 do not come around him/her on this hall;-Resident #27 said Resident #7 was a [NAME].During an interview on 07/02/25 at 08:21 A.M., LPN B said:-He/she was at the nurse's desk on 06/22/25;-Resident #7 moved Resident #27's wheelchair and went around Resident #27:-Resident #27 reached out and slapped Resident #7 in the back of the head after he/she got around him/her;-Resident #27 told Resident #7 to not come around him/her on this hall;-Resident #27 said Resident #7 was a [NAME];-Resident #7 did not complain of pain;-Resident #7 did not say he/she was afraid of Resident #27.During an interview on 07/03/25 at 08:55 A.M., the Administrator said: -Resident #27 hit Resident #7 on the back of the head;-Resident #27 hit Resident #7, because Resident #7 moved his/her wheelchair;-Resident #27 told Resident #7 to stay off his/her hall;-Abuse is willful and intended;-Hitting is considered a form of abuse;-Resident #7 did not complain of pain;-Resident #7 did not say he/she was afraid of Resident #27;-He/She expected Resident #7 to be free from abuse;-He/She expected all residents to be free form abuse.During an interview on 07/03/25 at 08:58 A.M., the DON said:-Resident #27 hit Resident #7 on the back of the head;-Resident #27 hit Resident #7, because Resident #7 moved his/her wheelchair;-Resident #27 told Resident #7 to stay off his/her hall;-Abuse is willful and intended;-Hitting is considered a form of abuse;-He/She expected Resident #7 to be free from abuse;-He/She expected all residents to be free form abuse.MO256314At the time of the abbreviated survey, the violation was determined to be at the immediate and serious jeopardy level J. Based on observation, interview and record review completed during the onsite visits, it was determined the facility had implemented corrective action to remove the IJ violation at the time. A final revisit will be conducted to determine if the facility is in substantial compliance with participation requirements.At the time of exit, the severity of the deficiency was lowered to the G level. This statement does not denote that the facility has complied with State law (Section 198.026.1 RSMo.) requiring that prompt remedial action be taken to address Class I violation(s).
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the rights of a resident's ability to make con...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the rights of a resident's ability to make confidential phone calls to the state abuse and neglect hotline for three of the three sampled residents, Residents #16, #109, and #18, when the facility's provided phones would not allow any outgoing call to dial the Missouri abuse and neglect hotline number. This had the potential to impact all residents of the facility who wished to make a phone call to the Missouri abuse and neglect hotline. The facility census was 56. Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents Rights, undated, showed:-Residents have the right to exercise their rights. Encouragement and assistance is provided for the exercise of the resident's right as a resident and as a citizen. Residents may voice grievances and recommend changes to facility staff or to outside representatives free from restraint, interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal.-Residents have the right to confidentiality. All information related to a resident's medical, personal, social, or financial affairs shall be treated confidentially;-The right to privacy in medical treatment, personal care, telephone and mail communications, visits and meetings of family and of resident groups. Residents should be treated with consideration and respect, with full recognition of their dignity and individuality;-The right to communicate freely, that residents may associate with and communicate privately with persons of their choice and send and receive mail unopened.1. Review of Resident #16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 4/10/25 showed:-Cognition intact;-Independent with activities of daily living;-Diagnoses: high blood pressure and psychiatric mood disorder. During an observation of Resident #16 on 6/30/25 at 10:00 A.M., showed the facility phone would not reach the hotline, it would drop the call after a partial ring. During an interview on 6/30/25 at 10:00 A.M., the resident said:-He/she was not able to call the toll free abuse and neglect hotline phone number;-He/she was not allowed by the facility to use his/her personal phone due to guardian restricting resident from having a personal cell phone;-He/she was not allowed by the facility to access the internet on his/her personal devices for one month;-He/she would need to borrow another resident's personal phone to call the hotline, as all the facility phones will not go through to the state hotline phone number;-This upsets him/her and would like to be able to make a phone call, if needed. 2. Review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -No cognitive impairment;-The resident had delusions;-The resident received antipsychotics (a class of medications primarily used to treat mental health disorders) daily;-Diagnoses included, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety, and depression. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 05/29/25, showed:-The resident was at risk for falls;-The resident had behaviors;-Maintain a safe environment. During an observation of Resident #18 on 6/30/25 at 2:56 P.M., showed the facility phone would not reach the hotline, it would drop the call after a partial ring. During an interview with Resident #18 on 6/30/25 at 2:56 P.M., said:-He/she was not able to make phone calls to the state hotline as the calls seem to be blocked or cut off when he/she calls it; -He/she would have to ask to use another resident's personal phone in order to reach the hotline;-He/she reported the concern to staff, but nothing was done to fix the issue, was unsure of the date; -He/She felt angry when he/she could not call the hotline the night his/her knee was broken. During an interview with Resident #18 on 07/01/25 at 09:28 A.M., the resident said:-The facility blocked the state hot line on the resident's phone;-When the number was called it rang once and then nothing happened;-He/She tried the number four or five times and it did not work;-He/she tried to call on the resident's phone and the phone at the nurses desk and none of them worked;-There was a code used to dial long distance and he/she used that and it still did not work;-He/She wanted to call the state hotline the night his/her knee got broke, but he/she could not because the number did not work;-He/She felt angry when he/she could not call the hotline the night his/her knee was broken. 3. Review of Resident #109's Care plan, dated 6/24/25, showed:-Post traumatic stress disorder;-Cognition intact, but has attention deficit;-Psychiatric disorder;-Goal was for resident to not harm self or others. During an observation of Resident #109 on 6/30/25 at 1:15 P.M., showed the facility phone would not reach the hotline, it would drop the call after a partial ring. During an interview on 6/30/25 at 1:15 P.M., the resident said:-He/she is not able to use the facility phones to call out for help; -When he/she tried to call the abuse and neglect line, the facility phone would not work - Not being able to make calls to the hotline frustrates him/her and makes him/her feel helpless. -He/She told Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A about the phone not working but nothing had been done; -He/She had a right to call the state anytime he/she would like. 4. Observation of the Administrator on 6/30/25 at 1:00 P.M., showed:-The administrator attempted to call the hotline from his/her office unsuccessfully;-The administrator attempted to call the hotline from the all three of the residents (Resident #16, #109, and #18) phones unsuccessfully;-The administrator attempted to call the hotline from his/her personal cell phone and the call was successful;-The administrator attempted to make a call using the code prefix on the residents (Resident #16, #109, and #18) phone calls unsuccessfully;-The administrator had other staff try making a call to the hotline number from the resident's three phones and they were all three unsuccessful.Observation on 07/01/25 at 2:57 P.M., this surveyor tested the facility hand-held phone and the two desk phones that residents are allowed to use. All three phones did not successfully call the abuse and neglect hotline number.Observation on 07/01/25 at 2:59 P.M., this surveyor tested the hotline number using a personal cell phone and the call to the abuse hotline went through.Observation on 07/02/25 at 10:02 A.M., this surveyor tested the facility handheld phone and the two desk phones that residents are allowed to use. None of the calls went through to the abuse hotline.Observation on 07/03/25 at 9:00 A.M., this surveyor tested the facility handheld phone and the two desk phones that residents are allowed to use. None of the calls went through to the abuse hotline.Observation on 07/03/25 at 9:05 A.M., this surveyor tested the hotline number using a personal cell phone and the call to the abuse hotline went through. Observation on 07/03/25 at 10:35 A.M., showed the administrator dialed the state abuse hotline phone number on the phones at the nurse's desk and the number could not be reached. During an interview on 6/30/25 at 1:00 P.M., the Administrator said he/she attempted to dial the hotline from his/her office and the call dropped after one partial ring. The Administrator said that all residents can ask the nurses to use the desk phones and then they can dial the hotline number. He/She attempted to dial out from the two desk phones that residents can use and the resident's land line for public use and the call to the hotline dropped after one ring. The Administrator then attempted to call the same phone number with his/her own personal phone and the call went through. He/she said that there is a code used for long distance calls, but not needed for 1-800 numbers. The Administrator said the residents should be allowed to make and receive calls in private. During an interview on 6/30/25 at 3:00 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) dialed the abuse and neglect hotline phone number from his/her office and received one partial unanswered ring and then a dead phone line. The ADON said that he/she had not needed to try dialing the hotline before but did not understand how it was not working in the building. She said there is a code to enter before long distance calls are made however the code is not working with the state hotline phone number. She then attempted to call a different number using the code, the phone number for Emergency Service calls and did not get through successfully either. The ADON Attempted to call the emergency phone service without using the code and it did not go through, and the call dropped. During an interview on 6/30/25 at 3:15 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) tried to dial the abuse and neglect hotline from his/her office and received one partial unanswered ring and then a dead phone line. He/she said that this phone line is confusing. He/she stated residents should be able to make and receive calls in private when needed. During an interview on 07/03/25 at 11:05 A.M., CMT A said:-Resident #109 told him/her the abuse hotline was not working, and was not sure how long it had been like this; -CMT A did not tell anyone;-CMT A thought the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator already were aware of the phone not working;-He/She should have told the administrator immediately.During an interview on 07/03/25 at 11:18 A.M., the Administrator said:-She was just made aware the abuse hotline was not able to be accessed from the facility phones;-She expected staff to tell her immediately if the abuse hotline was not working;-The resident's should have easy access to the abuse hotline at anytime. During an interview on 7/03/25 at 11:30 A.M., the Administrator and the DON said residents have the right to call the abuse hotline from a facility phone and it should be a successful call. They did not believe that they should have to borrow a phone from another resident to place the call. The Administrator was not sure how long this had been going on. MO256236
May 2024 11 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify the status of the Resident #11's Do Not Resuscitate Order (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clarify the status of the Resident #11's Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNR, medical order that instructs the health care provider not to do resuscitative measures if a person's heart stops) when the resident's responsible party signed the revocation provision of the DNR, with out changing the order on the resident's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) to Full Code Status. This affected one resident (Resident #11). The facilty census was 53. Review of the facilty's Advanced Directive Policy, dated March 2015, showed: -The social services designee will inquire of the resident and/or his/her family members about the existence of any written advanced directives information; -Advanced directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record under the advanced directive tab. 1. Review of the resident's DNR showed: - 10/16/23, The resident's responsible party signed the revocation provision, revoking the resident's DNR code status. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 4/28/24 showed: -Moderate cognative impairment; -Supervision for ADL's; -Occasionally incontinent of urine; -Diagnoses included heart failure, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. -Review of the resident's care plan dated 4/28/24, showed: -admit date [DATE]; -Provide the resident with support with ADL's; -The resident has anxiety; -The resident is a DNR. Review of the residents POS dated 5/1/24 showed: -Order Start date 10/16/23: Code Status - DNR. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 09:55 A.M., Administrator said: -Social Services usually takes care of this and he/she is not here today; -If the resident is a DNR there should be an order on the POS that states the resident is a DNR; -If the revocation provision is signed that means the resident is no longer a DNR but is a full code and live saving measures would be given; -He/She expects the Social Service Director to ensure any discrepancy on the DNR is clarified; -He/She expects the DNR form to be filled out correctly.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to train staff to adequately care for one resident (Resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to train staff to adequately care for one resident (Resident #179) with behavioral health care needs, causing Resident #22 to feel unsafe within the facility. The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide a policy on education and competency. Review of education records for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A and B for August 2023-May 2024 showed no education on psychiatric illness and interventions. 1. Review of Resident #179 medical record showed: -admitted on [DATE]; -Diagnoses of: Bipolar Disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (a mental health condition that's triggered by a terrifying event - either experiencing it or witnessing it), Autism (developmental disorder that affects how people interact with others, communicate, learn, and behave); -No base line care plan, no comprehensive care plan, no Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff). 2. Review of Resident #22 Annual MDS dated [DATE] showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 12, indicated slight cognitive loss; -No behaviors; -Maximum assistance to dependence on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's: tasks completed in a day to care for oneself); -Diagnoses of Cerebral Palsy (a group of conditions that affect movement and posture; caused by damage that occurs to the developing brain, most often before birth), Anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread and uneasiness), Hypertension (high blood pressure) and spastic quadriplegia (a permanent nerve and muscle disorder causing limitations with severe involvement of the legs and arms and floppiness of the neck.); 3. Observation on 05/28/24 at 1:15 P.M. showed -Resident #179 was pacing the 200 hall; -He/She was yelling loudly, and cursing into the telephone; -Multiple residents were sitting in the dining room, completing the noon meal, and watching resident #179; -CNA A was sitting at a dining table assisting residents to eat and observed resident #179 multiple times, and did not respond; -CNA B was sitting at a dining table assisting residents to eat and observed resident #179 multiple times and did not respond; -Resident #22 asked CNA B if he/she could assist him/her to his/her room. -CNA B assisted Resident #22 to his/her room and returned to the table. He/She did not respond to resident #179 pacing, cursing and yelling. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 9:34 A. M . Resident #22 said: -He/She had to be taken from the dining room because it was too loud and upsetting. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 11:04 A.M. CNA C said: -He/She transferred to this facility from another facility; -He/She had a quick reminder of how to use gloves and infection control prior to moving to the facility; - He/She did not get any further training. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 11:17 A.M. CNA A said: -He/She has been working at the facility for the last 8 to 9 months; -He/She was not provided any education on care of residents with psychiatric conditions; -He/She was sitting at the middle table when Resident #179 got upset and was yelling; -He/She did not do anything because he/she did not know what to do; -He/She was afraid to say anything to Resident #179 in case he/she flipped out; -It was really over stimulating. Resident #22 was crying and had to be taken to his/her room and did not finish his/her meal. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 11:31 A.M. CNA B said: -He/She was at a dining room table when resident #179 was pacing, yelling and cursing on the phone; -He/She did not know what to do to intervene; -He/She had no training for behavior management and psychiatric conditions. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 4:10 P.M. with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON): The Administrator said: - Staff absolutely need training how to deal with agitated residents and psychiatric disorders; -He/She is unsure what education staff have completed; - Registered Nurse A completes all education; -He/She and the DON will track all training; -He/She expects competency to be completed at least every 12 months, or quarterly as needed for issues. The DON said: He/She did not know what education had been completed prior to his/her arrival last week; -Competency should be completed annually. MO236514
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for three residents (Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for three residents (Resident #2, #11 and #24) when the facility allowed multiple residents to remain in common areas with bare skin exposed with no staff intervention. This affected 3 out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights Policy showed in part: -The resident shall be treated with consideration and respect and full recognition of their dignity and individuality. 1. Observation on 5/27/24 at 12:22 P.M. showed: -Multiple younger residents moving from table to table; -Multiple residents with their abdomen showing and upper buttocks showing; - Multiple residents yelling back an forth at each other and yelling at the kitchen; -The geriatric residents are staying seated while the younger residents are going up to the meal window yelling at the kitchen staff. 2. Review of Resident #2's Significant Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) dated 4/3/24 showed: -Severe cognative impairment; -No mood behavior issues; -Maximum assist for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's -an individual's daily self-care activities such as eating, bathing, walking and transfers); -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Receives Hospice services; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (a disease that affects the brain causing memory problems), arthritis, and high blood pressure. Review of the Resident's care plan dated 3/21/24, showed: -The resident requires the assistance of two staff for ADL's and transfers; -The resident has behaviors; -Avoid over stimulation; -Maintain a calm environment. During an interview on 05/28/2, at 04:24 P.M., the Resident's responsible party said: -It is very loud and busy at the facilty now and he/she is not sure the resident will be comfortable with the new residents; -Several of the residents are not dressed appropriately for this age group; -He/She had very little notice of the room change and that a group of younger, behavioral health residents would be moving into the facilty; -He/She has concerns that the new residents came so quickly and he/she is afraid that the younger residents will not interact the resident appropriately; -He/She has concerns that the new staff would not know how to take care of the resident; -He/She does not feel the resident would be as safe as he/she was in the past; -He/She is considering moving the resident because of this. 3. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Moderate cognative impairment; -Supervision for ADL's; -Occasionally incontinent of urine; -Diagnoses included heart failure, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. -Review of the resident's care plan dated 4/28/24, showed: -Provide the resident with support with ADL's; -The resident has anxiety; -The resident is a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - medical order that instructs the health care provider to not no live resuscitative measures if a persons heart stops) code status. During an interview on 05/28/24 at 03:32 P.M., the resident said: -He/She has a lot of anxiety since the new younger residents moved in to the facilty; -He/She hates to go to the dining room now because the new residents are loud and yelling at each other; -The new residents need to pull their pants up and their shirts down; -He/She does not like to see all the exposed body parts when he/she goes to the dining room; -He/She used to keep the door to his/her room open but knows it is noisy and he/she doesn't feel safe; -The staff know he/she is concerned but nothing gets done. 4. Review of Resident #24's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Moderate cognative impairment; -Supervision for ADL's; -Occasionally incontinent of urine; -Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (too much sugar in the blood), high blood pressure and high cholesterol. -Review of the resident's care plan dated 12/28/23, showed: -Provide the resident support with ADL's; -The resident has pain; -The resident is a DNR code status. During an interview on 05/28/2, at 03:39 P.M., the resident said: -The new residents walk around with their bottoms and stomachs showing and he/she does not like that because it is disrespectful; -The staff tell them to pull their pants up but they fall back down again; -There was a fight in the dining room at supper last night:; -He/She feels like this is not his/her home anymore; -He/She sets next to a resident that talks all the time and it is upsetting and the staff will not move the resident; -He/She is nervous about leaving his/her door open because of the new residents. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 04:10 P.M., the Administrator said: -He/She expects that residents in the common areas and the dining room should be dressed appropriately; -All residents should treat each other with respect; -There should be no exposed skin. MO236514
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0559 (Tag F0559)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change MDS dated [DATE], showed: -Severe cognative impairment; -No mood behavior issues; ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change MDS dated [DATE], showed: -Severe cognative impairment; -No mood behavior issues; -Maximum assist for ADL's; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Receives Hospice services; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, arthritis, and high blood pressure. Review of the resident's care plan dated 3/21/24, showed: -The resident requires the assistance of two staff for ADL's and transfers; -The resident has behaviors; -Avoid over stimulation; -Maintain a calm environment. Review of the resident's medical record showed: -Nurses note dated 5/3/24 showed the resident's responsible party was notified by phone of the room move; -No written notice of the room move was found. During an interview on 05/28/24 at 04:24 P.M., the resident's responsible party said: -The facility called on 5/3/24 and said they where moving the resident to another hall so they could keep the new residents on the same hall; -The facilty did not give the resident a choice of rooms or to move; -He/she did not receive a written notice; He/she would have liked some time to talk this over more with the facilty. 3. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Moderate cognative impairment; -Supervision for ADL's; -Occasionally incontinent of urine; -Diagnoses included heart failure, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. -Review of the resident's care plan dated 4/28/24, showed: -Provide the resident with support with ADL's; -The resident has anxiety; -The resident is a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - medical order that instructs the health care provider to not no live resuscitative measures if a persons heart stops) code status. Review of the resident's medical record showed: -Nurses note dated 5/3/24 showed he resident's family was notified by phone of the room move; -No written notice of the room move was found. During an interview on 05/28/24 at 03:32 P.M., the resident said: -The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) called on a Friday and the facilty moved him/her to another room on a Monday; -The facilty provided the resident with no written notice; -His/her family was called but nothing in written was provided to either of them; -He/she was not given a choice of a room or the choice to move; -The facilty just said his/her new room would be a certain number; -He/she would have like more notice before the room change. 4. Review of Resident #24's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Moderate cognative impairment; -Supervision for ADL's; -Occasionally incontinent of urine; -Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (too much sugar in the blood), high blood pressure and high cholesterol. -Review of the resident's care plan dated 12/28/23, showed: -Provide the resident with support with ADL's; -The resident has pain; -The resident is a DNR code status. Review of the resident's medical record showed: -Nurses note dated 5/3/24 showed he resident's responsible party was notified by phone of the room move; -No written notice of the room move was found. During an interview on 05/28/24 at 03:39 P.M., the resident said: -The staff told him/her to get ready to move to another room and only gave us a few days notice; -The staff did not let him/her choose a room the facilty told him/her the room he/she would be in; -He/she did not receive a written notice of the room move; During an interview on 05/30/24 at 02:25 P.M., the resident's family member said: - He/she did not receive a written notice of the facilty was going to move the resident; - He/she was verbally notified of the room move while at the facilty; - The facilty did not give the resident a choice of a room or the choice to move at all, the facilty said they were moving the resident; - He/she would have liked advanced notice in writing. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 04:10 P.M., the Administrator said: -The notification of the room moves are documented in the nurses notes of the residents that were here prior to the new residents admitting; -Residents should be provided a a written notice regarding a room change, including the reason for the room change, before the facility moved the resident to another room. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their policy when the facility did not provide four residents a written notice regarding a room change, including the reason for the room change, before the facility moved the resident to another room (Resident # 3, Resident #2, Resident #11 and Resident #24), of the 14 sampled residents . These residents did not want to be moved and were emotionally upset about the room changes. The facility's census was 53. Review of the facility policy, Room Change, dated 2017 showed: -It is the policy of this facility to promote a resident's right to make choices and to promptly receive written notice of a room change or change in an assigned roommate. The facility supports the resident's right to refuse a room change made solely for the staff's convenience. A resident's preferences should be taken into account when considering such changes. When a resident is being moved at the request of the facility staff, the resident, family and/or resident representative must receive an explanation in writing of why the move is required. The resident should be provided the opportunity to see the new location, meet the new roommate and ask questions about the move. The room change or roommate assignment change notice will be issued as much as in advance as possible upon knowledge of the need for change. Documentation of the notice and response will be included in the medical record. The notice contains the reason for the room or change, the effective date of the change and the location to which the resident will be moved. 1. Review of Resident #3 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) dated 4/18/24 showed: -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, Indicated no cognitive deficit. -No behaviors -Moderate to dependence of staff for activities of daily living (ADL's: tasks completed in a day to care for oneself such as bathing, toileting, personal hygiene) -Diagnoses of Bipolar Disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration.), diabetes mellitus(a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood) , anxiety disorder (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), and obstructive sleep apnea (occurs when the throat muscles relax and block the airway while sleeping). Review of the resident's medical record showed: -Nurse progress notes on 5/03/2024 at 1:16 P.M. resident's daughter and resident were notified of move/room change next week by Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). His/her family mentioned possibly changing to a private pay room. -There was no written notice of room moves. During an interview on 5/28/24 at 9:40 A.M. Resident #3 said: - He/She had to move out of his/her room so multiple new residents could move in. -He/She was previously on the 400 hall. -He/She was not given written notice. -He/She was not given a choice about moving rooms. -He/She was told one day and moved rooms 2 days later. -This had all been very distressing for him/her.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility failed to provide a comfortable and home -like environment for four of 20 sampled residents ( Resident #2, #11, #22...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility failed to provide a comfortable and home -like environment for four of 20 sampled residents ( Resident #2, #11, #22 and #24) when they failed to ensure sound levels were not loud and uncomfortable in the dining room, when a resident was yelling and staff failed to intervene, and when the facility failed to ensure the door to the smoking area did not slam shut when residents went in and out and caused distress for one resident (resident #24). The facilty census was 53. Review of the facility's undated Resident Rights Policy showed: -The resident shall be treated with consideration and respect and full recognition of their dignity and individual preferences. The facility did not provide the requested policy regarding a comfortable and homelike environment. 1. Observation on 5/27/24 at 12:22 P.M. showed: -Multiple younger residents moving from table to table; - Multiple residents yelling back an forth at each other and yelling at the kitchen staff; -The geriatric residents stay seated while the younger residents are going up to the meal window yelling at the kitchen staff. 2. Review of Resident #2's Significant Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff) dated 4/3/24 showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -No mood behavior issues; -Maximum assist for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's, an individual's daily self-care activities such as eating, bathing, walking and transfers); -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Receives Hospice services; -Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease (a disease of the brain that affects memory and reasoning), arthritis, and high blood pressure. Review of the Resident's care plan dated 3/21/24, showed: -The resident required the assistance of two staff for ADL's and transfers; -The resident had behaviors; -Avoid over stimulation; -Maintain a calm environment. During an interview on 05/28/24 at 04:24 P.M., the Resident's responsible party said: -It is very loud and very busy at the facilty now. - He/She has concerns that the new residents came so quickly and he/she was afraid the younger residents will not interact with the resident appropriately; - He/She said he/she talked to an employee and a lot of their staff are being replaced by the staff from another facilty and do not know how to take care of mental health residents; -He/She said he/she had concerns that the people would not know how to take care of the resident; -The resident has the right to a home like environment. 3. Review of Resident #11's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Supervision for ADL's; -Occasionally incontinent of urine; -Diagnoses included heart failure, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. -Review of the Resident's care plan dated 4/28/24, showed: -Provide the resident with support with ADL's; -The resident has anxiety; -The resident is a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR - medical order that instructs the health care provider to not no live resuscitative measures if a persons heart stops) code status. During an interview on 05/28/24 at 03:32 P.M., the Resident said: -He/She has a lot of anxiety since the new residents moved in; -Meals are late he/she hates to go to the dining room because he/she has to set by those people; -He/She needs help at meals and the old staff would take the time to help him/her but the new staff said they do not have time; -He/She used to keep the door to his/her room open but does not feel like it is safe to do so anymore; -The door to the smoke area keeps slamming shut and he/she can hear it even with his/her door shut; -His/Her family is going to move him/her out of the facility because he/she just can't take it. 4. Review of Resident #22's Annual MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Moderate cognative impairment; -No mood or behavior issues; -Maximum assist for ADL's; -Diagnoses included Cerebral palsy (disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture) high blood pressure and anxiety. Observation of the dining room on 5/28/24 at 1:15 P.M., showed: -Resident #179 was pacing on 200 hall and was talking on the phone, yelling loudly and cursing; -Residents are sitting in the dining room nearby and were looking at the resident pacing and yelling on 200 hall; -Staff are sitting at the dining room tables assisting residents with eating; -The staff did nothing to intervene and no staff responded to resident #179 that was yelling on 200 hall; -Resident #22 asked to be removed from the dining room because of the noise and told staff it increased his/her anxiety and he/she did not eat. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 11:17 A.M., Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) A said: -He/She had no education about dealing with mental health residents; -He/She was setting at a table when Resident #179 got upset and was yelling and he/she didn't do anything because he/she didn't know what to do; -He/She was afraid to say anything incase Resident #179 flipped out on him/her; -It really overstimulated Resident #22 and he/she was crying and acting out then he/she yelled because he/she was so upset with the other residents yelling; - A lot of our geriatric residents have left because of the new residents. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 11:31 A.M., CNA B said: -He/She was here when Resident #179 got upset and he/she did not know what to; -He/She received no training; 5. Review of Resident #24's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Moderate cognative impairment; -Supervision for ADL's; -Occasionally incontinent of urine; -Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (too much sugar in the blood), high blood pressure and high cholesterol. -Review of the resident's care plan dated 12/28/23, showed: -Provide the resident with support with ADL's; -The resident has pain; -The resident is a DNR code status. Observation of 300 hall on 5/28/24, from 1:35 P.M. to 1:46 P.M., showed: -Resident #24 is in his/her room setting in a chair; -Multiple residents standing in the hall near the resident's room by the smoke room door; -Multiple residents walk out into the smoking area and the door loudly slams shut behind them; -1:39 P.M., a resident comes back inside from the smoke area and the door loudly slams shut; -1:41 P.M., a resident comes back inside from the smoke area and the door loudly slams shut; -1:42 P.M., a resident comes back inside from the smoke area and the door loudly slams shut; -1:45 P.M., a resident comes back inside from the smoke area and the door loudly slams shut; -1:46 P.M., a resident comes back inside from the smoke area and the door loudly slams shut. During an interview on 05/28/24 at 03:39 P.M., the resident said: -The resident that sets next to him/her at meals talk all the time and it upsets him/her and the staff will not move him/her. -The big problem is out side his/hers room is the door to their smoking area and the door slams hard every time someone goes in and out; -He/She goes to bed around 7:00 P.M. and the door is still slamming; -The slamming door makes him/her nervous; -He/She has told the staff about his/her concerns but nothing has been done so far. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 10:40 A.M., the resident said: -He/She is hearing the door close to the smoke area; -He/She has told the staff again but doesn't not remember who; -He/She liked things the way they were at the facility before the new residents came. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 11:31 A.M., CNA B said: -Some of the residents choose to stay in their rooms because of the noise and too much going on around them; -It gets pretty loud sometimes and he/she does not know how to make it any quieter or any better. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 04:10 P.M., the Administrator said: -He/She expects to have peaceful quiet areas in the facilty; -If the noise level is loud the staff ask the residents to turn down the noise level; -We try to keep the loud residents together and we cannot tell them they can't yell; -No one should be that uncomfortable in their own home.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Assessments (Tag F0636)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assure resident Minimum Data Set assessments were comp...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assure resident Minimum Data Set assessments were completed accurately and timely for three of 14 sampled residents (Residents #177, #78 and #80 ). The facility census was 53. Review of the facility provided Minimum Data Set and Care Planning Guidelines, dated 10/1/2015 included; It is the policy of this facility to use the most current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, any published Interim RAI manual errata documents and applicable federal guidelines as the authoritative guide for completion of the MDS, CAAs and resident care planning. 1. Review of Resident #177's face sheet showed: - The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]; - Diagnoses included: Schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), falls, pain in the right wrist, shortness of breath, generalized abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea, pain, depressive episodes, low back pain, cough, bipolar disorder, migraine headaches, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that affect the lungs), diabetes mellitus (lifelong condition where the pancreas makes little or no insulin, which leads to high blood sugar levels), and anxiety. Review of the resident's medical record showed: -No completed MDS in the resident chart. -No care plan in his/her chart. 2. Review of Resident #78 Face sheet showed: -He/she admitted to the facility 5/7/24 -Diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder, Edema (swelling) , Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), Morbid Obesity (more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight), Paranoid Personality Disorder (a mental health condition marked by a long-term pattern of distrust and suspicion of others without adequate reason to be suspicious) , Pervasive Developmental disorder (characterized by delays in the development of social and communication skills) , Insulin dependent Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety, Schizophrenia (A disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). Review of the resident's medical record showed: -No completed MDS in the resident chart. -No care plan in his/her chart. 3. Review of Resident #80 Face sheet showed: -He/she admitted to the facility on [DATE] Diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (A progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions.), difficulty walking, Cognitive Communication Deficit (difficulty understanding what is said, or inability to respond in a timely fashion), Glaucoma (a group of eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of your eye), Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements), seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain), dermatitis (a common condition that causes swelling and irritation of the skin) , Kidney failure (a condition in which one or both of your kidneys no longer work on their own), Schizoaffective Bipolar type (a mental disorder characterized by episodes of mania (extreme highs) and sometimes major depression (severe lows)). Review of the resident's medical record showed: -Entry tracking record completed 5/8/24 -No completed MDS in the resident chart. -No care plan in his/her chart. 4. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 10:00 A.M. the MDS Coordinator said: -admission MDS Assessments should be completed within 14 days and submitted within 21 days. -If the MDS was started it would show in progress in the medical record. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 4:10 P.M. with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator : -The DON said admission MDS should be completed in 14 days. Residents who admitted on [DATE]th, 8th, or 9th should have had a completed MDS. -The administrator said residents should have had a MDS completed within 14 days of admission.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individual...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans, to address the specific needs of the residents, for three of 14 sampled residents (Residents #8, #78 and #80). The census was 53. Review of the facility provided Minimum Data Set and Care Planning Guidelines, dated 10/1/2015 showed: It is the policy of this facility to use the most current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Minimum Data Set (MDS) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, any published Interim RAI manual errata documents and applicable federal guidelines as the authoritative guide for completion of the MDS, CAAs and resident care planning. 1. Review of Resident #8 admission MDS 5/1/24 showed: -admission date of 4/24/24; -Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicated No cognitive deficits. -Vision was severely impaired , he/she wore corrective lenses; -Assist of 1-2 staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's: tasks completed in a day to care for oneself); -Continent of bowel and bladder; -Diabetic foot ulcers (wounds that are caused by the diabetes disease process); -Pressure reduction devices for the bed and chair; -Diagnoses of Unspecified fracture of right acetabulum (broken hip), fracture of the great toe, repeated falls, Constipation, Anxiety disorder (A mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities), depression (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stops you doing your normal activities), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe.), hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis ( inability to move on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke), hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus (A group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood) with diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage that can occur if you have diabetes), chronic kidney disease(CKD: gradual loss of kidney function.), atrial fibrillation (a rapid and irregular heart beat), and peripheral vascular diseases (condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). Review of the medical record showed no comprehensive care plan for Resident #8. 2. Review of Resident #78 Face sheet showed: -He/She admitted to the facility 5/7/24; -Diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental health disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms, such as depression or mania), edema (swelling) , Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), morbid obesity (more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight), paranoid personality disorder (a mental health condition marked by a long-term pattern of distrust and suspicion of others without adequate reason to be suspicious) , pervasive developmental disorder (characterized by delays in the development of social and communication skills), insulin dependent Diabetes Mellitus lifelong condition where the pancreas makes little or no insulin, which leads to high blood sugar levels). anxiety, schizophrenia (A disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly). Review of the resident's medical record showed: -No completed MDS in the resident chart. -No care plan in his/her chart. 3. Review of Resident #80 Face sheet showed: -He/she admitted to the facility on [DATE]; Diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (A progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions.), difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit (difficulty understanding what is said, or inability to respond in a timely fashion), glaucoma (a group of eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of your eye), Parkinson's Disease, seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain), dermatitis (a common condition that causes swelling and irritation of the skin) , kidney failure (a condition in which one or both of your kidneys no longer work on their own), and schizoaffective bipolar type (a mental disorder characterized by episodes of mania (extreme highs) and sometimes major depression (severe lows)). Review of the resident's medical record showed: -Entry tracking record completed 5/8/24 -No completed MDS in the resident chart. -No care plan in his/her chart. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 10:00 A.M. the MDS Coordinator said: -admission MDS Assessments should be completed within 14 days and submitted within 21 days. -If the MDS was started it would show in progress in the medical record. -Care Plans are completed after the MDS, within 7 days. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 4:10 P.M. with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator: -The DON said admission MDS should be completed in 14 days. Care plans are completed 7 days after the MDS is completed. -The administrator said residents should have had a MDS completed within 14 days of admission and a care plan within another 7 days. The process is 21 days total.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0838 (Tag F0838)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and update their facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for their residents competently during d...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and update their facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for their residents competently during day to day operations and emergencies. The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide the requested policy regarding maintaining a facility assessment. 1. Review of the facility's 802/Matrix (a tool used by facilty staff to identify pertinent care areas for residents living in the facilty), dated 5/27/24 showed: -32 residents with behavior health needs; -The facilty census was 53. Review of the facility assessment, provided by the facility, showed: -The name of the administrator was incorrect; -Assessment review date with the Quality Assurance and Assessment/ Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAA/QAPI) committee was 12/14/22; -Annual review date was 2/2/23; -The average daily census was 20; -Three residents with behavior health needs; -The information provided was incorrect. During an interview on 5/30/2024 at 4:10 P.M., the Administrator said: - The facility assessment has not been updated to reflect recent changes at the facility, including change of administrator; -The facility assessment should be completed within seven to fourteen days after a change; - It is the Administrator's responsibility to ensure the facility assessment is reviewed regularly and updated as needed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to maintain infection control when two of 14 sampled resident's (Residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to maintain infection control when two of 14 sampled resident's (Resident #177 and #178), nebulizer machines (a machine that turns liquid medication into a mist and is inhaled) and tubing were resting on the floor without a barrier. Additionally Resident #178's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask was observed resting on the floor and not on a barrier. The facility census was 53. The facility did not provide a policy regarding placement of nebulizer machines and CPAP mask's. 1. Review of Resident #177 record showed the following: -The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; - Diagnoses included: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of diseases that affects breathing), cough, and anxiety; - No Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by the facility staff) or care plan had been completed; - A physicians order dated 5/21/24 for ipratropium- albuterol (a medication used to help make breathing easier and administered with a nebulizer machine) solution for nebulization 0.5 milligram (mg) -3 mg per vial. Administer 1 vial with the nebulizer machine every 6 hours as needed. Observation on 5/28/24 at 9:43 A.M. showed the resident's nebulizer machine sitting directly on the floor. The tubing and mouthpiece were lying on the floor. There was no barrier. During and interview and observation on 5/29/24 at 7:57 A.M. showed: - The resident's nebulizer machine on the floor with the tubing and mouth piece on the floor; - The resident said the nebulizer on the floor was the most convenient place for him/her because he/she did not have a table to set the nebulizer machine on; - If he/she had a table, he/she would store it on the table. 2. Review of Resident #178's record showed the following: - The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; - Diagnoses included: Shortness of breath, cough and anxiety; - The resident's baseline care plan showed the resident used a CPAP machine; - No MDS or comprehensive care plan; - Physician's order dated 5/26/24 for ipratropium-albuterol 0.5 mg-3 mg per vial. Give 1 vial with a nebulizer machine every 6 hours as needed; - Physician's order dated 5/16/24 to clean the CPAP weekly on Sundays, including the head gear and tubing, filter, and distilled water chamber. Observation on 5/28/24 at 9:08 A.M. showed: - The resident's nebulizer machine, tubing and mouth piece on the floor with no barrier; - The resident's CPAP mask was lying on the floor with no barrier. Observation on 5/29/24 at 10:22 A.M. showed: - The resident's CPAP mask on the floor without a barrier; - The resident's nebulizer machine and tubing was lying on the floor with no barrier. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 11:00 A.M. the resident said he/she stored the nebulizer machine and his/her CPAP mask on the floor because he/she did not have a table to store them on. 3. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 9:3.1. the Infection Preventionist said: - He/She expected all nebulizer machines with their tubing and CPAP masks to be off of the floor; - There should be an elevated surface available for the resident to store those items; - Nebulizer tubing, mouth pieces and CPAP masks should not touch the floor and should be wrapped in a disposable bag. During an interview on 5/30/24 at 4:10 P.M., the administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) said nebulizer machine, tubing and CPAP masks should be in a bag and not on the floor.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct at least twelve hours of nurse aide in-service education per year, failed to provide nurse aide's annual individual performance rev...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct at least twelve hours of nurse aide in-service education per year, failed to provide nurse aide's annual individual performance review or evaluation and competency,and failed to implement a tracking system for monitoring training hours. This effected two of two sampled nurse aides (Certified Nurse Aide; (CNA) D and CNA E) and had the potential to effect all staff and residents. The facility's census was 53. The facility did not provide a policy on education and competency. 1. Record review of the in-service records for CNA D showed: - A hire date of 6/15/2021; -Had less than twelve hours of in-service education per year; -No annual competency for 2023. 2. Record review of the in-service records for CNA E showed: -A hire date of 11/3/2023 with a previous hire date of 4/10/2014; -Had less than twelve hours of in-service education; -No annual competency. During an interview on 05/30/24 at 4:10 P.M. with the Director of Nursing and the Administrator said: -The Administrator said she started work at this facility a week ago; -Staff absolutely need training, particularly on how to deal with psychiatric illness and behaviors; -Registered Nurse (RN) A puts out booklets for education he/she wants the staff to have; -The DON and she will track training; -Competency should be completed annually or quarterly if there was an issue; -The DON said she began working at the facility a week ago; -She was not sure what education had been provided previously; -There was no tracking system for individual staff; -Competency should be completed at least yearly or as needed.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when floors, and vents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when floors, and vents were covered in dirt and debris, and when equipment in the kitchen was covered in dust and when the dry storage contained outdated food and hazardous chemicals and when the facilty failed to ensure the dishwasher sanitizer was checked before meal service. This could potentially impact all residents by dirt or debris coming in contact with food and food preparation areas and food being served on contaminated dishes. Additionally outdated food can be potentially hazardous due to spoilage. The facility census was 53. Review of the facility's Safe Food Handling Policy, dated 5/20/15, showed: -All food items should be stored and tightly sealed with an identifying label and date. Review of the facilty's Storage of Dry Food and Supplies Policy, dated 5/20/15, showed: -The store room must be neat and orderly; -Store chemicals in an area separate from food storage. Review of the facilty's Dish Wash Policy, dated 5/20/15, showed: -Check chemical dispensers for adequate supply of chemical three times a day. The facilty did not provide the requested policy on cleaning of the vents in the kitchen. 1. Observation on 05/29/24 at 10:44 A.M., showed: - An open package of noodles dated 2024; -Vent by the plastic storage container with the cleaning rags was covered with dust and debris; -Trash can between the refrigerators was open and overflowing with food particles running down the sides; -Two empty card board boxes, a fan covered with dirt and debris, a bucket containing a black liquid with a mop standing in it next to a food storage rack; -A vacuum cleaner and scattered papers on the floor in front of the storage rack that contained [NAME] crackers coffee and cocoa; -A step ladder covered with dust setting next to the refrigerator; -The dishwasher sanitation log had no entries on 4/7/24, 4/24/24, 4/25/24. 4/31/24 and 5/9/24 through 5/29/24. -The floor in the dry storage room was dirty and sticky; -The trash can in the dry storage room was overflowing: -There was a can of unopened bleach powder and three gallons of germicidal bleach setting on a rack in the dry storage where other foods were stored; - Storage bin with sugar dated 3/15/22 and a storage bin containing flour dated 2/22/22; -Open package of rice with no date. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 1:22 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said: - Maintenance is responsible for cleaning the vents in the kitchen; -He/She puts a maintenance order either in the binder or by word of mouth and that is how it is reported; -The vents should be cleaned at least every two or three months. He/She cleaned the vents the last time they were cleaned but could not remember when; -There should be no sticky substances on the floors in the kitchen; -Chemicals shouldn't be stored with food in the dry storage room; -The trash can should not be overflowing in the kitchen or in the dry storage room and the lid to the trash can should be closed. The trash cans should be clean free of food debris and dripping debris; -The stepladder should not be in the kitchen and if it is it should be clean; -The vacuum, the box fan covered in dust, the brooms and debris on the floor by where the [NAME] crackers were stored shouldn't be in the kitchen; -The sanitizer for the dishwasher should be checked three times a day before meal service; -The bins with the sugar and the flour in the dry storage should not be dated older than one year. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 1:50 P.M., the Registered Dietitian (RD) said: -He/She expected the kitchen to be clean and free of dirt and debris; -He/She expected the vents to be clean and free of debris and chemicals should not be stored in the dry storage room with food; -The trash should be emptied before it becomes overflowing the trash can lid should not stand open; -The dates on the sugar and flour should not be later than one year; -He/She expected the sanitizer concentration in the dishwasher to be recorded before every meal service; -The unnecessary clutter of the fan, the empty boxes and the brooms should be removed from the kitchen; -He/She expected the kitchen to be clean and sanitary. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 2:14 P.M., the maintence department said: -He/She was not sure how often the vents should to be cleaned in the kitchen; -The kitchen staff takes care of cleaning the vents in the kitchen; -Any work orders for maintence are put in a book but generally are given by word of mouth; -No work orders for cleaning the vents in the kitchen have been received. During an interview on 5/29/24 at 4:10 P.M., the Administrator said: -He/She expected the kitchen staff to keep the kitchen clean and sanitary; -He/She expected the kitchen staff to make sure the food is stored properly; -He/She expected the sanitizer in the dishwasher to be checked before meals; -The kitchen staff were responsible for reporting any repairs to maintenance.
Dec 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident to resident altercation that was investigat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident to resident altercation that was investigated as abused was reported to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two hour time frame when Resident 1 slapped Resident #2 in the face on 12/18/23. The facility census was 21. Review of the reporting abuse and neglect policy dated November 2016 showed: - The facility staff were to report abuse allegations to DHSS within two hours after the allegation was made; - All employees of the facility are mandated reporters of abuse and neglect; - All allegations of abuse will meet the two hour reporting timeframe requirement even if it occurs during night shift, on the weekend, or during a holiday. 1. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility staff) Dated 11/5/23 showed: - He/She had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, indicating sever cognitive impairment; - He/She had physical and verbal behaviors during the assessment period; - He/She was able to ambulate with a walker, and dependent on staff for personal cares; - His/Her diagnoses included: Dementia with behaviors (a disease that affects the brain, the residnet's ability to remember and impaired reasoning), insomnia (difficulty getting to sleep or staying asleep), and anxiety. Review of the resident's behavior care plan dated 11/16/23 showed: - The staff were directed to avoid over stimulation of the resident; - The staff were directed to divert the resident's behavior by offering the resident snacks; - The staff were to maintain a calm environment for the resident and redirect the resident when he/she had physical or verbal outbursts. 2. Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed: - He/She had a BIMS score of 14, indicating little to no cognitive impairment; - The resident was dependent to the wheel chair and on staff for showers; - The resident's diagnoses included: Stroke with left upper and lower extremity weakness, body weakness and depression. Review of the resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan dated 2/9/23 showed he/she required the assistance of one staff member to shower. 3. Review of the medical record showed the following: - 12/18/23 11:50 A.M. Licensed Practical nurse A documented Resident #1 became agitated after staff took Resident #2 to the shower. Resident #1 attempted to follow Resident #2 and the staff member to the shower, the staff member told Resident #1 he/she could not follow Resident #2 into the shower room. Resident #1 slapped Resident #2 in the face. Staff seperated the residents immediately. Resident #2 did not have any injuries. 4. During an interview on 12/25/23 at 5:45 A.M. Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) A said: - He/She asked Resident #2 if he/she wanted a shower during the evening of 12/18/23; - Resident #1 was nearby and he/she said he/she would give Resident #2 a shower; - CNA A told Resident#1 he/she could not help with Resident #2's shower; - Resident #1 became agitated and with an open hand, slapped Resident #2 across the face; - Staff intervened and seperated the resident's; - He/She reported the incident to LPN A. During an interview on 12/25/23 at 6:31 A.M. Resident #2 said: - He/She was going to the shower; - Resident #1 hit/him/her across the face; - The resident did not know why Resident #1 was upset; - He/She was startled when Resident #1 hit him/her. During an interview on 12/25/23 at 6:55 A.M. The Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Administrator said: - We discussed the incident, but did not think to report it to DHSS. - We should have reported the incident to DHSS with two hours of receiving the abuse allegation. During an interview on 12/26/23 at 10:50 A.M. the DON said he/she should have reported the incident to DHSS within two hours since there was an allegation of abuse. MO229224
Oct 2022 11 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain the walking surfaces around the facility free from obstructions to ensure residents and staff could safely exit the f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain the walking surfaces around the facility free from obstructions to ensure residents and staff could safely exit the facility to the public way in the event of an emergency. The facility had a capacity of 63 with a census of 19 at the time of the survey. 1. Observation on 12/20/22 beginning at 10:10 A.M., showed holes and uneven asphalt in the handicapped parking spot which measured approximately 5 feet by 2 inches. During an interview on 12/20/22 at 10:10 A.M., the Maintenance Director said they had been doing repairs to the parking lot and prioritized what had been repaired. During an interview on 12/20/22 at 2:00 P.M., the Administrator said the issues with the handicapped parking spot should have been repaired, but corporate only approved the repairs that had been made and that was not part of it.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the staff failed to ensure the physician signed the resident's purple Outside of Hospital ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the staff failed to ensure the physician signed the resident's purple Outside of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OHDNR, it instructs health care providers not to begin cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR, if the resident's breathing sops or if a resident's heart stops beating) for one of eight sampled residents, (Resident #1) and failed to ensure two physicians signed the incapacitation form for Resident #8 and #5. The facility census was 16. Review of the facility's undated policy for advance directive showed, in part: - The facility will respect advance directives in accordance with state law; - Upon admission of a resident, the social services designee will inquire of the resident, and /or his/her family members, about the existence of any written advance directives; - Information about whether or not the resident has executed an advance directive shall be displayed prominently in the medical record under the advance directive tab. 1. Review of Resident #1's OHDNR order sheet showed; - The resident signed the form on [DATE]; - The physician did not sign the form. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated [DATE] showed; - Cognitive skills moderately impaired; - Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, stroke, and depression. Review of the resident's undated care plan, showed: - The resident was a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). During an interview on [DATE] at 4:09 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C said: - The purple OHDNR forms should be signed by the physician; - If the physician had not signed it, then he/she would consider the resident to be a full code. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:24 P.M., the Social Services Designee said: - He/she had been in the current position for about a year; - He/she tried to make sure the family or responsible party has signed it and then sends it to the physician to be signed; - Should make sure the physician has signed the form. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:58 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: - The OHDNR forms should be signed by the physician; - Social Services is responsible to make sure it has been completed. 2. Review of the facility's policy for completion of capacity verification form, revised [DATE] showed, in part: - The purpose is to assist facility staff and resident's medical providers in determining if a resident has the capacity to consent to or the withholding of care, medication, or medical procedures; - The policy does not state when there should one or two physicians to declare the resident incapacitated. Review of the Missouri statue 404.825. dated [DATE] showed: - Examination of patient required, content. - Unless the patient expressly authorizes otherwise in the power of attorney, the powers and duties of the attorney in fact to make health care decisions shall commence upon a certification by two licensed physicians based upon an examination of the patient that the patient is incapacitated and will continue to be incapacitated for the period of time during which treatment decisions will be required and the powers and duties shall cease upon certification that the patient is no longer incapacitated. One of the certifying physicians may be the patient's attending physician. The certification shall be made according to accepted medical standards. The determination of incapacity shall be periodically reviewed by the attending physician. The certification shall be incorporated into the medical records and shall set forth the facts upon which the determination of incapacity is based and the expected duration of the incapacity. 3. Review of Resident #8's OHDNR form, showed: - The resident's representative signed the form on [DATE]; - The physician signed the form on [DATE]. Review of the resident's capacity form showed: - One physician signed the form on [DATE]. Review of the resident's medical chart showed the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA), did not specify if there should be one or two physicians to declare the resident incapacitated. Review of the resident's undated care plan, showed; - The resident was a DNR. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - The resident's cognitive status was not addressed; - Diagnoses included anxiety and depression. 4. Review of Resident #5's OHDNR form, showed: - The resident's representative signed the form on [DATE]; - The physician signed the form on [DATE]. Review of the resident's capacity form showed: - One physician signed the form on [DATE]. Review of the resident's medical chart showed the Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA), did not specify if there should be one or two physicians to declare the resident incapacitated. Review of the resident's undated care plan, showed; - The resident was a DNR. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of zero, which indicated severe cognitive impairment; - Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, hypertension, anxiety and depression. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:09 P.M., LPN C said: - He/she thought it had to be two physicians to declare the resident incapacitated. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:24 P.M., the Social Services Designee said: - He/she sends the incapacity form for the physician to sign; - The physician will either sign the form or come and see the resident and decide if the resident is incapacitated; - Once the physician had deemed the resident incapacitated, then it is sent to another physician for a signature; - There should be two physicians to declare the resident incapacitated. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:58 P.M., the DON said: - There should be two physicians to declare a resident incapacitated; - Social Services is responsible to make sure it has been completed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN), CMS-10055 for two sampled residents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN), CMS-10055 for two sampled residents (Resident #3 & 16). The facility census was 16. Review of undated facility policy showed: -Please refer to Medicare claims Processing Manual, chapter 30 for general notice rquirements and detailed information about SNFABN. Information on the ABN (Form CMS-R-131) can be found on the ABN webpage: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/BNI/ABN.html -A.) SNF's will continue to use the ABN Form CMS-R-131 when applicable for Medicare Part B items and services. -Completing the SNFABN -The SNFABN is available for download by selecting the 'FFS SNFABN' link from the menu on the wepage http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/BNI/index.html. The SNFABN is a CMS-approved model notice and should be replicated as closely as possible when used as a mandatory notice. Failure to use this notice or significant alterations of the SNFABN could result in the notice being invalidated and/or the SNF being held liable for the care in question. 1. Review of the medical records for Resident #16 showed: -Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) CMS-10123 form provided and signed on 10/24/22. - Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form CMS-R-131 (3/11) dated 10/24/22. -No docmentation of SNF ABN CMS-10055 form provided. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 showed: -NOMNC CMS-10123 form provided and signed on 7/29/22. -No documentation of SNF ABN CMS-10055 form provided. -Used ABN form CMS-R-131 (3/11) dated 7/29/22. During an interview on 10/26/22 at 12:13 P.M., Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff) Coordinator said: -He/she was not aware of form SNF ABN CMS-10055. -He/she have not been using SNF ABN CMS-10055 when providing beneficiary notices. -He/she was told to use. -He/she has always provided forms CMS-R-131 and NOMNC CMS-10123 forms with beneficiary notices. During an interview on 10/26/22 at 12:16 P.M., Administrator said: -He/she was unaware that facility was using wrong form with beneficiary notices -His/her understanding was that ABN form CMS-R-131 was required to be provided to residents discharging from therapy.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assure residents have the right to file grievances in writing; the right to file grievances anonymously; the contact inform...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assure residents have the right to file grievances in writing; the right to file grievances anonymously; the contact information of the grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed, that is, his or her name, business address (mailing and email) and business phone number; a reasonable expected time frame for completing the review of the grievances, the right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 16. Review of the facility policy for grievance protocol showed: -Purpose of the Grievance/complaint Report and Grievance Log is to provide a written record on each resident and family concern and to insure proper follow-up through the appropriate discipline. -The Social Services Director is responsible for the program although the Administrator is ultimately responsible for the proper implementation of the program. The social Service Director informs the Administrator of each incident. -Guidelines: Any member of the Social Services staff can complete the Grievance Complaint Report. The appropriate situations for use of the Grievance Complaint Report are: -Resident articles that are lost or cannot be located; continual concern of lost resident items. This would include laundry concerns. -Resident care or personal hygiene issues that cannot be immediately resolved. -Resident or family concerns with dietary issues: diet or temperature of the meals. -Any resident or family concern with a staff member. -Any resident or family issue that would require a resolution. -The Social Service Director will: -Obtain the original Grievance Complaint Report. -Record the grievance on the Monthly Grievance Log. -Inform the Administrator of the grievance. -Forward a copy of the grievance to the appropriate discipline. -The Administrator and Social Service Director evaluate the Monthly Grievance Log for trends or patterns and devise an Action Plant to correct the issues. -A new Grievance Log should be completed each month. It should be presented at the QAA Meeting quarterly. Observation in facility on 10/25/22 through 10/28/22 showed: -No contact information of grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed posted in facility. -No grievance forms available in facility During an interview on 10/26/22 at 8:37 A.M. Resident #12 said: -He/she has never completed a written grievance about her concerns; -He/she does not know how to file a grievance; -He/she currently voices complaints during resident council minutes. During an interview on 10/26/22 at 8:47 A.M. the Social Services Director said: -Grievance process includes residents voicing concerns during Resident Council meetings -When residents come to him/her with a grievance he/she fills out a form. -He/she reviews complaints with Director of Nursing and the Administrator and they discuss an intervention. -He/she does not know if grievance information is posted in facility as he/she just moved into social service position last March. -Grievance forms are not available for the residents or families; -He/she fills out grievance forms for residents During an interview on 10/28/22 at 9:42 A.M. Resident #2 said: -He/she is unsure if the facility has grievance forms available. -He/she does not know where grievance forms would be located at. -If he/she has a complaint he/she tells MDS Coordinator or Social Services Director Social or mentions it to Laundry staff. -He/she has provided verbal grievances to the Social Services Director -He/she is not sure what to do if Social Services Director is not present in facility to file grievance but he/she would probably tell the Nurse, Administrator, or MDS Coordinator. -He/she does not know of access to obtain a grievance form. -Social service director just fills out grievance forms. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 9:54 A.M., Social Services Director said -Staff and residents are educated about ways to voice grievances or concerns via the rights paper I give them -He/she tells residents during resident council if they have anything they can come to him/her. -He/she is new in position and does not know how family members or residents file grievances after hours or anonymously because he/she has never had one. He/she believes they would probably tell the charge nurse that is in facility and believes the charge nurse would then provide a note on or under his/her door or that they would contact the administrator by phone. -He/she states there are no forms posted in facility. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 9:54 A.M. with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A said: -He/she would talk to resident if they voiced a grievance or concern and see if there was anything he/she could do to help then would notify the nurse. -He/she is not sure if there is a form for grievances -He/she has never had to do a complaint form. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 10:01 A.M. with CNA B said: -He/she would go to the nurse if received a complaint or grievance. If nurse didn't handle situation then would go to the Director of Nursing. -He/she is not sure if facility has a grievance policy/ During an interview on 10/28/20 at 10:10 A.M. with CNA C said: -He/she would let a nurse know if received a complaint/grievance from resident or family member. -He/she does not know the process as she is not facility staff but rather agency staff. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 10:18 A.M. MDS Coordinator said: -He/she states grievances are to be reported to Social Services Director whom is the social worker and she takes it from there. -He/she receives communication from Social Services Director if nursing needs to do something to address the grievance/complaint. -He/she states family members will usually tell nurses if they have a complaint and also communicate to social services coordinator. -He/she also reports complaints to his/her supervisor like the Director of Nursing and Administrator, whomever it applies to. -If it is weekend or after hours complaints and grievances are communicated via the nurse. -There is not a way that he/she is aware that individuals can make anonymous complaints. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 10:25 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B said: -If he/she received a complaint would take it to the appropriate person including the Director of Nursing or the MDS Coordinator. -He/she is not sure if there is a grievance/complaint form. -He/she would verbally pass on the complaint. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 2:58 P.M. Director of Nursing (DON) said: -Most residents and families go to the Social Services Director for grievances as he/she has been here forever. -Social Services Director was not aware of grievance process. The DON showed Social Services Director today grievance book in Administrator's office and the form for grievances. -Administrator explained to Social Services Director the grievance process of giving grievances to appropriate department heads. -Department heads are to fill out on grievance form the action they took and return to social services director. -Social Services Director has the grievance form now and plans to spend some time reviewing policy. -Social Services Director has had no training for her job role. -Grievance forms are not accessible to family members of residents. -Unsure if facility should have grievance forms accessible after hours. -Facility does not have method to submit grievance forms anonymously.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided written notice of transfer or discharge to re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided written notice of transfer or discharge to residents or their responsible party and the reasons for the transfer in writing in a language they understood. This affected two of eight sampled residents, ( Resident #8 and #5). The facility census was 16. Review of the facility's undated policy for discharge/transfer of a resident, showed, in part: - The purpose is to provide safe departure from the facility and to provide sufficient information for aftercare of the resident; - Explain transfer and reason to the resident and /or representative and give copy of signed transfer or discharge notice to the resident and /or representative or person responsible for care. NOTE: if emergency transfer, transfer or discharge notice form may be completed later, but as soon as possible; - Complete transfer form, copy any portion of the medical record necessary for care of resident; - Send original of transfer form and portions of medical record that was copied with the resident. Review of the facility's undated emergency transfer notice showed: - It did not contain the following pertinent information: - The reason for the transfer; - Statement of appeal rights including name, address (mailing and e-mail), telephone number of the entity and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request. 1. Review of Resident #8's progress notes, dated 7/25/22 showed: - 12:02 A.M., upon entering the resident's room observed the resident to be lying face down on blankets on the floor. The resident had a bloody nose with swelling and redness to nose. Resident with complaint of pain while attempting to assess range of motion. Physician notified and received order to send resident to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation and treatment. Director of Nursing (DON) notified and the responsible party notified. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/17/22 showed: - Cognitive skills for daily decision making not addressed; - Diagnoses included high blood pressure, anxiety, altered mental status change and depression Review of the resident's medical chart showed no documentation of a letter of reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital sent with the resident or to the responsible party. 2. Review of Resident #5's progress notes, dated 10/22/22 showed: -4:57 P.M. 3:35 P.M. Resident call light noted to be on, upon entering room resident noted to be on knees next to bed with right arm behind body. Resident's body held in position and resident assisted from left side to back. The right arm stabilized during reposition. Shirt cut off for assessment as so not to move right arm. Resident Range of Motion (ROM) to left arm bilateral lower extremity (BLE) noted within normal limits (WNL). No noted shortening or deformity with palpitation. Resident had no noted signs or symptoms of pain or discomfort. Res continued to repeat common. Resident right arm noted to have external rotation at the elbow. Resident noted to have abrasion to bilateral knees. No noted bruising or redness noted to face or bilateral arm. Resident's bed in low position and winged mattress in place resident does attempt to get out of bed at times without assistance against nursing advice. Primary care physician called and order received to transfer. Resident left on back while awaiting Emergency Medical Transport. 3:48 P.M. 911 called. 5:00 P.M. local ambulance arrived. Local hospice notified. 4:10 P.M. local ambulance left with the resident. Review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of zero, which indicated severe cognitive impairment; - Diagnoses included high Parkinson's Disease, anxiety, and depression. Review of the resident's medical chart showed no documentation of a letter of reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital sent with the resident or to the responsible party. During an interview on 10/26/22 at 2:15 P.M., the MDS/CP Coordinator said: - When a resident is sent out to the hospital, we do not send a transfer or discharge letter, we just send the transfer form, a copy of the resident's physician order sheet, medication list, face sheet and their insurance cards; - She sends a copy of the residents who were sent out to the Ombudsman monthly. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 2:58 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: - When a resident is sent to the ER, we should send a discharge letter with the resident and to the responsible party and it should be in plain language they resident and family can understand.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a bed hold policy to residents or their respo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a bed hold policy to residents or their responsible party when staff transferred two of eight sampled residents, (Resident #8 and #5) to the hospital. The facility census was 16. Review of facility's undated bed hold guidelines, showed, in part: - This facility will notify all residents and /or their representative of the bed hold guidelines; - This notification shall be given on admission to the facility, at the time of transfer to the hospital and at the time of non-covered therapeutic leave. 1. Review of Resident #8's progress notes, dated 7/25/22 showed: - 12:02 A.M., upon entering the resident's room observed the resident to be lying face down on blankets on the floor. The resident had a bloody nose with swelling and redness to nose. Resident with complaint of pain while attempting to assess range of motion. Physician notified and received order to send resident to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation and treatment. Director of Nursing (DON) notified and the responsible party notified. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 9/17/22 showed: - Cognitive skills for daily decision making not addressed; - Diagnoses included high blood pressure, anxiety, altered mental status change and depression Review of the resident's medical chart showed no documentation of the a bed hold policy or the with the resident. 2. Review of Resident #5's progress notes, dated 10/22/22 showed: -4:57 P.M. 3:35 P.M. Resident call light noted to be on, upon entering room resident noted to be on knees next to bed with right arm behind body. Resident's body held in position and resident assisted from left side to back. The right arm stabilized during reposition. Shirt cut off for assessment as so not to move right arm. Resident Range of Motion (ROM) to left arm bilateral lower extremity (BLE) noted within normal limits (WNL). No noted shortening or deformity with palpitation. Resident had no noted signs or symptoms of pain or discomfort. Res continued to repeat common Resident right arm noted to have external rotation at the elbow. Physician called and order received to transfer. 3:48 P.M. 911 called. 5:00 P.M. local ambulance arrived. Local hospice notified. 4:10 P.M. Local ambulance with resident. Review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of zero, which indicated severe cognitive impairment; - Diagnoses included high Parkinson's Disease, anxiety, and depression. Review of the resident's medical chart showed no documentation of a bed hold policy or bed hold letter sent with the resident. During an interview on 10/27/22 at 10:26 A.M., the MDS/CP Coordinator said: - If the resident is going to be gone longer than 24 hours, they call the responsible party and asked them to come in and sign the bed hold; - If the resident is going to the ER to be evaluated and treated, we don't do anything with the bed holds because they are already getting billed for that day. If it's longer than 24 hours they send the bed holds. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 2:58 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: - The bed holds should be signed before the resident leaves for the hospital.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop individualized person centered comprehensive ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop individualized person centered comprehensive care plans for two residents (Resident #2 and #9) to address vision changes for Resident #2 and the use of Warfarin (blood thinner) for Resident #9 out of 8 sampled residents. The facility census was 16. Review of the facility's undated policy for comprehensive care plans, showed, in part: - An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable goals and tine frames will be developed to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being; - The interdisciplinary care plan team with input from the resident, family and/or legal representative will develop and maintain a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain; - A well-developed care plan will be oriented to: evaluating treatment of measurable goals, timetables, and outcomes of care; using an appropriate interdisciplinary approach to care plan development to improve the resident's functional abilities; assessing and planning for care to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs; addressing additional care planning areas that are relevant to meeting the resident's needs in the long-term care setting. 1. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff , dated 4/17/22, showed: -Vision is adequate - sees fine detail, including regular print in newspapers/books -Wears corrective lenses Review of Resident #2's annual MDS , dated 7/16/22, showed: -Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 (which indicates cognitively intact) -Vision is adequate - sees fine detail, including regular print in newspapers/books -Wears corrective lenses Review of resident's care plan last updated on 7/16/22, showed: -Personal Care: Vision I am able to see adequately Observation on 10/25/22 at 11:28 A.M., showed -The resident was not wearing eye glasses During an interview on 10/25/22 at 11:28 A.M., the resident said: -He/she had cataract surgery right before COVID -He/she noted awhile back that he/she started not being able to see things -He/she had met with the eye doctor who advised some patients develop gunk over lenses of eyes following cataracts -The eye doctor referred for to have gunk removed via laser. -An appointment is scheduled to have gunk removed. -The glasses do not do him/her any good right now so doesn't wear them. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 9:54 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A said: -Knows resident care needs by resident's telling him/her their preferences or if it is in their care plans. -We have papers inside closet doors with resident care preferences. During an interview on 10/28/20 at 10:10 A.M. with CNA C said: -Knows resident specific care requests from in-service book, CNA report book, care plans behind nurses' station, care plans in closets in room During an interview on 10/28/22 at 10:25 A.M., MDS Coordinator said -Expectation is that transfers, risks, medication risks, interventions, continence, incontinence, and how to care for residents should be included in resident's care plans. -Vision changes should be included in the care plan -Completes a lot of verbal education and inservices with staff due to high volume of agency staff and never knowing what staff is coming in or not. -Monitors implementation of care plan by discussing it with staff and watching it -Get a lot of agency staff so do a lot of verbal training as you cannot make them read every book During an interview on 10/28/22 at 2:58 P.M., Director of Nursing (DON) said: -Care plans should paint a picture of resident -MDS Coordinator primarily updates care plans -Used to only have MDS coordinator update care plans but he/she has told nurses they can write changes on care plans -Aware facility care plans are generic -Care plans should be updated quarterly when completing care plan meetings. -Expects changes to be made to care plans as changes occur with residents up to daily or per shift -MDS Coordinator has too many other facility roles to focus on care plan updates -Care plan meetings are held with families many families want them to occur over the phone -[NAME] in closets updated by MDS Coordinator -He/she Updated room kardexes when started his/her position as some resident rooms had them posted and some did not -Kardexes should be updated with any care change for example if someone moves from 1 assist to 2 person assist. -DON responsible for coming up with interventions after a change in care to resident 2. Review of Resident #9's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toilet use; - Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, (irregular, often rapid heart rate that causes poor blood flow). Review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS) dated October, 2022 showed; - Start date: 6/17/22; Warfarin (Coumadin), five milligrams (mg.) daily for atrial fibrillation; - Start date: 6/24/22: Prothrombin time (PT, how long it takes blood to clot) and international normalized ratio, (INR , blood test to show if there's a problem with blood clotting). Review of the resident's care plan, dated 7/28/22 showed: - The resident is at risk for bruising; - Weekly skin audits; - Use gently touch during transfers and repositioning, document bruises in nurse's notes; - Monitor labs as ordered. During an interview on 10/27/22 at 10:26 A.M., the MDS/CP Coordinator said: - The care plans should be more detailed; - It should address the use of Warfarin.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to update three (Resident #5, #15, and #16) of 8 sampled...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to update three (Resident #5, #15, and #16) of 8 sampled residents' care plans with new interventions that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet his/her needs after two resident's had falls (Resident #5 and #15) and one resident's fluid restrictions (Resident #16). The facility's census was 16. Review of the facility's Policy for use of comprehensive care plans showed: - It is the policy of the facility to develop and utilize comprehensive care plans that include measurable goals and time frames that meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being and that identify the highest level of functioning the resident may be expected to attain. - Comprehensive care plans will be developed by the interdisciplinary care plan team with input from the resident, family, and/or legal representative - Comprehensive care plans will be based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to the MDS. - Care plans will be oriented to: a. Preventing avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels or otherwise clarifying why another goal takes precedence. b. Managing risk factors to the extent possible or indicating the limits of such interventions. c. Addressing ways to try to preserve and build upon resident strengths. d. Applying current standards of practice in the care planning process. e. Evaluating treatment of measurable goals, timetables and outcomes of care. f. Respecting the resident's right to decline treatment. g. Offering alternative treatments, as applicable. h. Using an appropriate interdisciplinary approach to care plan development to improve the resident's functional abilities. i. Assessing and planning for care to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. j. Involving resident, resident's family and other resident representatives as appropriate. k. Involving the direct care staff with the care planning process relating to the resident's expected outcomes. l. Addressing additional care planning areas that are relevant to meeting the resident's needs in the long-term care setting. -The comprehensive care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the resident's comprehensive assessment (MDS and CAAs). -Periodic review and updating of care plans will happen when a. A significant change in the resident's condition has occurred; b. At least quarterly; c. When changes occur that impact the resident's care 1. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, dated 9/14/22, showed: - a Brief Interview for Mental Status BIMS (a tool used to assist with identifying a resident's current cognition) score of zero, which indicated severe cognitive impairment; - Extensive assistance of two staff for transferring, dressing and toilet use, and personal hygiene; - Resident is not steady and is only able to stabilize with human assistance when transferring or transitioning positions; - Diagnoses included Parkinson's (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves) disease, hypertension, anxiety and depression; - The CAAs indicated the resident triggered a care area for falls based on information provided in the MDS; - Staff indicated they addressed falls in their care plan. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/22/19, showed: -Problem: Resident has a history of falls. - Approaches to : Monitor for signs or symptoms of weakness, dizziness, behaviors; - Call light within reach when in room; - Keep personal items and frequently used items within reach; - Keep in lowest position when in bed; - Complete fall risk assessment quarterly and with significant change. Review of a John Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment (an evidenced based tool used to assess risk of falling) dated 6/9/22 showed: -History of one or more falls within the previous six months; -Fall risk score of 17 indicating resident is a high fall risk Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: -Resident had unwitnessed fall on 7/28/22, no injuries noted; Review of a Fall Investigation dated 8/1/22 showed: - resident is confused; - no other contributing factors identified; - no immediate interventions taken; - preventative intervention: staff educated to have resident without pants when in bed; - a fall prevention program was initiated; - care plan was updated. Review of the resident's care plan for falls showed no interventions in place after the fall on 7/28/22. Review of a John Hopkins Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] showed: - a history of one or more falls within the previous six months; - a fall risk score of 18 indicating resident is a high fall risk Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: - resident had unwitnessed fall on 9/23/22, no injuries noted; Review of a Fall Investigation dated 9/26/22 showed: - no contributing factors identified; - no immediate interventions taken - preventative intervention: Remind resident that he/she needs assistance to get out of bed. Staff to monitor hourly; - a fall prevention program was initiated; - care plan was updated. Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: - residents' regular mattress was replaced on 9/28/22 with a winged mattress after resident was noted to be attempting to get out of bed to use the restroom without assistance; -resident had unwitnessed fall on 10/22/22 which resulted in a fracture to the right humerus. Review of hand written Fall Investigation Report dated 10/22/22 showed: -resident is a high fall risk -resident was attempting to get out of bed to use the restroom at the time of the fall Review of the resident's care plan showed staff made no other addendums with additional updates or interventions after any of the resident's falls. 2. Review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of four, which indicated severe cognitive impairment; - Supervision and oversight with one person physical assist for transferring, dressing and toilet use, and personal hygiene; - Resident is steady at all times when moving from seated to standing, walking, turning around and facing the opposite direction while walking, moving on and off the toilet, and surface-to-surface transferring; - Resident uses a cane for mobility; - Diagnoses included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and Dementia; - Resident had no falls since admission on [DATE]; Review of the resident's care plan, dated 4/22/19, showed a problem of Resident has a history of falls. Staff listed the following approaches: - Monitor for s/s of weakness, dizziness, behaviors, etc.; - Call light within reach when in room; - Keep personal items and frequently used items within reach; - Remind resident to call for assistance as needed; - Monitor labs as indicated and ordered by physician. Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: -resident had unwitnessed fall on 8/21/2022. Review of residents' care plan showed a new intervention was added to residents' care plan on 8/21/22: -Resident will sleep in recliner in common area so staff can monitor do to wandering and sleeps in recliner in room. Review of fall investigation dated 8/24/2022 showed: - resident was transferred to emergency room for evaluation and treatment; - resident would sleep in recliner in common area; - resident would be placed on 15 minute checks; - fall prevention program initiated; -care plan updated. Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: -resident had unwitnessed fall on 9/23/2022. Review of fall investigation dated 9/26/22 showed: -no immediate measures taken -resident was wearing shoes that were not his/hers at the time of fall, those shoes were put away; -resident to wear slip resistant socks; -fall prevention program initiated; -care plan updated. Review of the resident's care plan showed staff made no other addendums with additional updates or interventions after the resident's fall on 9/23/22. During an interview on 10/27/22 at 1:20 P.M. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B said: -fall interventions are communicated via the care plan book, resident care card (a tool used by the nursing staff to give care) on the inside of their closets, and the CNA report book -the fall interventions in place for resident are: winged bed, toileting schedule, leave the door open when not doing cares, and place the call light pad where when resident rolls over the light goes on; -since breaking his/her arm resident has not tried to climb out of bed. During an interview on 10/27/22 at 1:30 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C said: -care plans should be updated with new interventions after each fall; -the MDS Coordinator is responsible for updating care plans; -fall interventions are communicated through in-services and the CNA report book. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 3:15 P.M., the DON said: - Care plans should paint a picture of the resident; - Nurses can update care plans; - The MDS coordinator is wearing too many hats and is not able to keep up with MDS's and care plans; - Care plans should be updated quarterly and when incidents occur; - New interventions should be put in place when a fall happens; - Expectation is that the investigation be closed and care plan updated; - Care cards should be updated, nurses update those; - Nurses and DON collectively come up with new fall interventions; - Interventions are communicated with the CNA's via the 24 hour report sheet, and charge nurse verbal instruction. 3. Review of Resident #16's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], showed: -Requires supervision, oversight, and cueing support with eating. -admission performance of requiring supervision or touching assistance with the helper providing verbal cues or touching/steadying assistance. -Diagnosis of Hypo-osmolality (Hypo-osmolality is a condition where the levels of electrolytes, proteins, and nutrients in the blood are lower than normal. Limited fluid intake, medications, and hospitalization may be needed) and hyponatremia (Hyponatremia is condition that occurs when the level of sodium in the blood is too low. With this condition, the body holds onto too much water. This dilutes the amount of sodium in the blood and causes levels to be low. Symptoms include nausea, headache, confusion, and fatigue). Review of resident's care plan, dated 8/31/22, showed: -Problem: Hydration showed I have No drink preference with my meals. I am on a fluid restriction please assist me in maintaining the proper amount of fluid. -Problem: Resident requires: Puree -Handwritten note next to puree '10/5/22 1500 cc' -Goal: Resident will maintain current body weight through next review -Interventions/Discipline: -Diet: Puree -Encourage oral intake of food and fluids -Monitor and record intake of food -Monitor/record weight. Notify Medical doctor and family of significant weight change. -Requires set up. -Problem: Resident is at risk of dehydration due to fluid restriction -Goal: Resident will not exhibit signs and symptoms of dehydration. -Interventions/Discipline: -Assess for signs and symptoms of dehydration (I.e. dizziness on sitting/standing, change in mental status, decreased urine output, concentrated urine, poor skin turgor, cracked lips, dry mucous membranes, sunken eyes, constipation, fever, infection) -Keep fluids accessible and offer when entering room -Report all labs to physician -Weigh resident monthly unless otherwise specified. -The care plan did not identify the resident's fluid restrictions and how much fluid the resident should have with meals, medication administration and at bedside. Observed on 10/25/22 at 10:48 A.M. showed the resident had no water cup in his/her room. Review of the physician's orders on 10/26/22 showed: -Fluid restriction of 1000 cc noted in physician's orders. -200 cc at 7 A.M., 10:30 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 12:00 P.M., 7:00 P.M., and 11:00 P.M. Review of progress note's showed: -On 10/25/22 at 10:36 P.M. LPN A documented Resident is non-compliant with fluid restriction on this shift. Resident verbalizes understanding of importance of fluid restriction, however he/she frequently request more liquid from staff. Resident noted to be getting water from faucet through the night, staff educated resident on fluid restriction again. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 9:54 A.M. CNA A said: -The Nurse has the resident's cup that he/she keeps in the fridge -The resident has been filling cup up at the sink in his/her room -C.N.A's get cup from nurse and take it to the resident; -Knows resident #16's care needs from staff in-service book that is kept at desk or verbal information -Knows resident care needs by resident's telling him/her their preferences or if it is in their care plans. -We have papers inside closet doors with resident care preferences. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 10:01 A.M. CNA B said: -Staff are supposed to go down to the resident's room and ensure the resident doesn't have any extra cups. -When the resident has extra cups we are supposed to take them. -Believes fluid restriction is in resident care plan -Knows to the resident's cups based on what nurse has told them -Not sure why the resident is on a fluid restriction. -Reports changes with the resident fluid intake to the nurse. -The resident 's fluid restriction is in his/her care plan. During an interview on 10/28/20 at 10:10 A.M. CNA C said: -The resident has his/her cups at meals. -When the resident is thirsty he/she ring the call light. -The resident has a cup at nurses station that we go and get for him/her. -He/she reports any concerns with hydration to the nurse. During an interview on 10/28/20 at 10:20 A.M., LPN B said: -Monitors the resident's fluid intake via paper in nursing book with his/her notice. -The resident gets fluids with his/her medications of 60 mls and 200 ml with medications -The resident has a cup with lines that we monitor in the front of our book -The resident is ensured to get adequate liquids as every time he/she is in dining room we take his cup to him/her. We also periodically take it to him/her. We refill his/her cup to the line. -The resident is on fluid restriction due to his/her diagnosis. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 10:25 A.M., MDS Coordinator said -Expectation is that transfers, risks, medication risks, interventions, continence, incontinence, and how to care for residents should be included in resident's care plans. -Fluid restriction should be included in the care plan. -The care plan should include how to monitor and track fluid restrictions. -He/she completes a lot of verbal education and inservices with staff due to high volume of agency staff and never knowing what staff is coming in or not. -He/she monitors implementation of the care plan by discussing it with staff and watching the care plan for any changes; -The facility has a lot of agency staff so do a lot of verbal training as you cannot make them read every book.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards whe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards when staff did not implement interventions to prevent falls for two of 8 sampled residents (Resident #5 and #15) who was at risk for falls and who had both experienced multiple falls with injuries. The facility census was 16. Review of the facility's Policy Fall Precaution & Management Program and Guidelines showed: -the objective is to identify residents at significant risk of falls and provide for additional precautions to reduce and manage risk; - a resident will be placed in the Fall Precaution Program when any of the following condition exist: a. Fall Risk Assessment score on John Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Took is 6 or greater or as identified by the specific fall risk tool used; b. The resident is identified through use of the Care Area Assessment (CAS) as requiring care planning interventions to prevent and/or manage falls. c. The resident had a fall and the Risk Management Committee recommends resident be placed in the Fall Precaution Program, with interventions implemented as directed in the resident's care plan. -a Fall Risk Assessment is to be completed: a. At the time of admission to the facility; b. Reviewed and updated upon readmission if and as appropriate following a hospitalization; c. When a fall occurs and the resident is not already on the Fall Precaution Program d. When a fall occurs and the resident is already in the Fall Precaution Program the risk assessment is to be reviewed and updated with newly identified interventions based upon a root cause analysis (RCA) if and as appropriate. -Ongoing fall assessments will be done in conjunction with the Fall CAA when triggered. Fall status will be evaluated at the time of all care plan reviews for all residents; -all staff are to know that a resident is at risk for falls: a. The resident is to be under increased observation, particularly by nurse aides but all facility staff is to be alert to the need to assist the resident. b. The resident has a care plan with interventions specific to his/her individual risk factors. c. The resident is to be assisted immediately if there are signs he/she might fall, i.e., trying to climb out of bed, asking to go to the bathroom, etc., or evident of other unmet needs. d. If assistive devices are to be used, to be sure they are in place, i.e., walkers, canes, etc. e. Be certain that any safety devices are in place, i.e., wheelchair anti-tipping devices, specialty cushions, etc.; -all incidents are to be immediately investigated by the charge nurse for possible root cause(s) and/or contributing factors, with corrective measures to prevent or manage further falls implemented as reasonable and to the extent possible; -a complete head-to-toe assessment is to be performed on any resident who falls to determine injury, and the findings documented in the resident's medical record; the physician and responsible party should be notified as soon as possible if the fall resulted in any injury, or according to any prior instructions as given by the physician and/or responsible party; -an event report is to be completed in the resident's medical record to include root cause analysis (RCA) and any additional interventions as identified by the RCA. These new interventions are to be incorporated into the resident's care plan appropriately; -all falls and incidents are to be reviewed at morning clinical meetings, and logged by the Director Of Nursing (DON), or designee, for review at the weekly Risk Management Committee meeting; -the DON or designee, will keep a record of which residents are on Fall Precautions and will ensure that care plans are updated accordingly and interventions are followed by staff. 1. Review of Resident #5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 9/14/22, showed: - a Brief Interview for Mental Status (The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) is a structured evaluation aimed at evaluating aspects of cognition in elderly patients. ) score of zero, which indicated severe cognitive impairment; - Extensive assistance of two staff for transferring, dressing and toilet use, and personal hygiene; - Resident is not steady and is only able to stabilize with human assistance when transferring or transitioning positions; - Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, hypertension, anxiety and depression; - The CAAs indicated the resident triggered a care area for falls based on information provided in the MDS; - Staff indicated they addressed falls in a care plan. Review of the resident's care plan, developed on 4/22/19, showed a problem of Resident has a history of falls. Staff listed the following approaches: - Monitor for s/s of weakness, dizziness, behaviors, etc.; - Call light within reach when in room; - Keep personal items and frequently used items within reach; - Keep in lowest position when in bed; - Complete fall risk assessment quarterly and with significant change. Review of a John Hopkins Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] showed: -a history of one or more falls within the previous six months; -a fall risk score of 17 indicating resident is a high fall risk Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: - resident had unwitnessed fall on 7/28/22, no injuries noted. Review of a Fall Investigation dated 8/1/22 showed: - resident is confused; - no other contributing factors identified; - no immediate interventions taken; - preventative intervention: staff educated to have resident without pants when in bed; - a fall prevention program was initiated; - care plan was updated. Review of a John Hopkins Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] showed: - a history of one or more falls within the previous six months; - a fall risk score of 18 indicating resident is a high fall risk. Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: - resident had unwitnessed fall on 9/23/22, no injuries noted. Review of a Fall Investigation dated 9/26/22 showed: - no contributing factors identified; - no immediate interventions taken; - preventative intervention: Remind resident that he/she needs assistance to get out of bed. Staff to monitor hourly; - a fall prevention program was initiated; - care plan was updated. Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: - residents' regular mattress was replaced on 9/28/22 with a winged mattress after resident was noted to be attempting to get out of bed to use the restroom without assistance; -Resident had unwitnessed fall on 10/22/22 which resulted in a fracture to the right humerus. Review of hand written Fall Investigation Report dated 10/22/22 showed: -resident is a high fall risk -resident was attempting to get out of bed to use the restroom at the time of the fall Review of the resident's care plan showed staff made no other addendums with additional updates or interventions after any of the resident's falls. 2. Review of Resident #15's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of four, which indicated severe cognitive impairment; - Supervision and oversight with one person physical assist for transferring, dressing and toilet use, and personal hygiene; - Resident is steady at all times when moving from seated to standing, walking, turning around and facing the opposite direction while walking, moving on and off the toilet, and surface-to-surface transferring; - Resident uses a cane for mobility; - Diagnoses included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and Dementia; - Resident had no falls since admission on [DATE]; Review of the resident's care plan, developed on 4/22/19, showed a problem of Resident has a history of falls. Staff listed the following approaches: - Monitor for s/s of weakness, dizziness, behaviors, etc.; - Call light within reach when in room; - Keep personal items and frequently used items within reach; - Remind resident to call for assistance as needed; - Monitor labs as indicated and ordered by physician. Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: -resident had unwitnessed fall on 8/21/2022. Review of residents' care plan showed a new intervention was added to residents' care plan on 8/21/22: -Resident will sleep in recliner in common area so staff can monitor do to wandering and sleeps in recliner in room. Review of fall investigation dated 8/24/2022 showed: - resident was transferred to emergency room for evaluation and treatment; - resident would sleep in recliner in common area; - resident would be placed on 15 minute checks; - fall prevention program initiated; -care plan updated. Review of the electronic medical record (e-MR) showed: -resident had unwitnessed fall on 9/23/2022. Review of fall investigation dated 9/26/22 showed: -no immediate measures taken -resident was wearing shoes that were not hers at the time of fall, those shoes were put away; -resident to wear slip resistant socks; -fall prevention program initiated; -care plan updated. Review of the resident's care plan showed staff added one intervention to the care plan after admission date of 6/2/22 was: - 8/21/22 -Resident will sleep in recliner in common area so staff can monitor do to wandering and sleeps in recliner in room. During an interview on 10/27/22 at 1:20 P.M. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B said: -fall interventions are communicated via the care plan book, resident care card on the inside of their closets, and the CNA report book; -the fall interventions in place for resident are: winged bed, toileting schedule, leave the door open when not doing cares, and place the call light pad where when resident rolls over the light goes on; -since breaking his/her arm resident has not tried to climb out of bed. -He/she is not aware of what a fall investigation is; -If an intervention is in place, he/she would find that intervention on the care plan; -There has been no new interventions put in place since the residents have fallen; During an interview on 10/27/22 at 1:30 P.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C said: -care plans should be updated with new interventions after each fall; -the MDS Coordinator is responsible for updating care plans; -fall interventions are communicated through in-services and the CNA report book. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 10:25 A.M., MDS Coordinator said -Expectation is that transfers, risks, medication risks, interventions, continence, incontinence, and how to care for residents should be included in resident's care plans. -He/she completes a lot of verbal education and inservices with staff due to high volume of agency staff and never knowing what staff is coming in or not. -He/she monitors implementation of the care plan by discussing it with staff and watching the care plan for any changes; -The facility has a lot of agency staff so do a lot of verbal training as you cannot make them read every book. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 3:15 P.M., the DON said: - Care plans should paint a picture of the resident; - Nurses can update care plans; - Care plans should be updated quarterly and when incidents occur; - New interventions should be put in place on the care plan when a fall happens; - Expectation is that the investigation be closed and care plan updated; - Care cards should be updated, nurses update those; - Nurses and DON collectively come up with new fall interventions; - Interventions are communicated with the CNA's via the 24 hour report sheet, and charge nurse verbal instruction.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN), other than the Director of Nursing (DON) , for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN), other than the Director of Nursing (DON) , for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week based on the daily staffing sheets and over the third quarter, to include weekends and week days. The facility census was 16. The facility did not provide a policy for RN coverage. 1. Review of the facility's payroll based journal (PBJ) report for Quarter 3 showed: - No RN hours in the month of April, 2022 on: - Saturday, 4/2; - Sunday, 4/3; - Saturday, 4/9; - Sunday, 4/10; - Saturday, 4/16; - Sunday, 4/17; - Saturday, 4/23; - Sunday, 4/24; - Saturday, 4/30. - No RN hours in the month of May, 2022 on: - Sunday, 5/1; - Saturday, 5/7; - Sunday, 5/8; - Saturday, 5/14; - Sunday 5/15; - Saturday, 5/21; - Sunday, 5/22; - Saturday, 5/28; - Sunday, 5/29; - Monday, 5/30. - No RN hours in the month of June, 2022 on: - Saturday, 6/4; - Sunday, 6/12; - Saturday, 6/18; - Sunday, 6/19; - Saturday, 6/25; - Sunday, 6/26. Review of the daily staffing sheets for August, 2022 showed no RN coverage on: - Saturday, 8/13; - Sunday, 8/21; - Saturday, 8/27; - Sunday, 8/28. Review of the daily staffing sheets for September, 2022 showed no RN coverage on: - Sunday, 9/11; - Monday, 9/19. Review of the daily staffing sheets for October, 2022 showed no RN coverage on 10/8/22. During an interview on 10/28/22 at 2:58 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: - They facility should be having an RN eight hours a day, seven days a week; - They have hired three RNs PRN (as needed) and will have one full time RN starting in November; - The Corporate Nurse fills in as an Administrator in other buildings and is usually somewhere else when the DON calls her to fill in; - The Business Office Manager (BOM) is new to the position and has attended a seminar on PBJ; - The facility has always had a licensed nurse since she has been in the DON position.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow pre-prepared menus to ensure they met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guide...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow pre-prepared menus to ensure they met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines, and failed to follow pre-determined recipes in meal preparation. These deficient practices potentially affected all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 14. -Record review of the undated Week at a Glance menus for weeks 1 through 4, provided by the Dietary Manager, showed a variety of meals that met the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established national guidelines. The lunch meal for week 1 that was supposed to be served was listed as pork fried rice, oriental cole slaw, broccoli, margarine donut, coffee or tea. Record review showed the recipe for 25 servings of chicken pot pie is: -6 oz. margarine -7 oz. yellow onions -11 oz. flour ½ tsp. black pepper 2 ½ quart. Chicken stock 3 lbs. pulled chicken meat 1 lb. cubed carrots 12 oz. diced celery 1 lb. frozen green peas 1 tsp. poultry seasoning Crust 12 oz. flour 1 cup margarine 1 tsp. salt ½ cup cold water 1. Sauté onions in margarine in steam-jacketed or other large kettle. 2. Add flour and pepper to onions, stir until blended. [NAME] 3 minutes. 3. Add stock, stirring constantly with wire whip. [NAME] until thickened, stirring often. 4. If necessary, cut chicken into ½ to ¾ inch pieces, add to sauce. 5. Cook celery and carrots until partially done, drain, fold into sauce. 6. Add uncooked peas and poultry seasoning to chicken mixture, mix carefully. 7. Scale chicken into 12 x 20 x 2 inch counter pan(s), 10 lb. per pan. 8. Cut shortening into flour and salt. Gradually add water to form a stiff dough. Roll out into 12 x 20 sheets to cover pans. 9. Cover chicken mixture with pastry to form a top crust. 10. Bake at 425 F for 20-25 minutes until internal product temperature reaches 165 F for 15 seconds. 11. Hold at minimum required temperature or higher for service. 12. Each pan yields 25 portions. Observation on 10/27/22 at 10:30 A.M. showed: -The kitchen manager baked the biscuits. He then split them in half and put the bottom halves of the biscuits in the bottom of a pan, poured two bags of a premade chicken pot pie mixture over the biscuits and then topped it with the top halves of the biscuits and baked it in the oven. During an interview on 10/27/22 at 11:00 A.M. the kitchen manager said: -He substituted today's lunch menu with chicken pot pie because when he has made pork fried rice in the past the residents did not eat it; -The previous kitchen manager taught him to make the chicken pot pie as he did. During an interview on 10/27/22 the registered dietician said: -Her expectation is that if the residents seem to dislike a particular meal that it be communicated to her so that the menu can be changed; -She was not aware that any residents did not like the pork fried rice; -Her expectation is that recipes be followed.
Sept 2019 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff transferred one of 12 sampled residents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff transferred one of 12 sampled residents (Resident #36) in a safe manner to prevent accidents or potential for accidents when staff failed to use proper technique and manufacturer's guidelines with a mechanical lift. Additionally, staff failed to periodically assess one of two residents (Resident #5) identified as smokers for smoking safety. The facility census was 37. 1. Review of the Invacare Reliant 450 Battery Powered Patient Lift, dated 2018, showed: - Does not recommend locking the rear casters of the patient lift when lifting an individual. Doing so could cause the lift to tip and endanger the patient and assistants; - Recommends that the rear casters be left unlocked during lifting procedures to allow the patient lift to stabilize itself when the patient is initially lifted from a chair, bed or any stationary object; - Wheelchair wheel locks must be in a locked position before lowering the patient into the wheelchair for transport; - Do not engage the rear locking casters when patient is in the lift. Review of Resident #36's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff, dated 8/8/19, showed: - Moderate cognitive impairment; - Total dependent of two staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs); - Impairment to one side of lower extremity; - Diagnoses included: diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety. Review of the care plan, dated 8/8/19, showed: - Ambulation: unable to propel myself, staff propel me in my wheelchair; - Transfers: requires two staff's assistance with a mechanical lift; - Positioning: unable to reposition myself in my chair or bed. Observation on 9/18/19, at 11:43 A.M., showed: - Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) A and CNA B applied the mechanical lift pad under the resident in his/her bed and applied to mechanical lift; - CNA A opened the legs of the mechanical lift under the resident's bed and locked the brakes; - CNA A raised the resident with the mechanical lift with the brakes locked; - CNA A then unlocked the brakes and transferred the resident without guiding him/her and the resident swung in the air. CNA B stood behind the unlocked brakes on the wheelchair, waited for resident to get closer to wheelchair, and did not guide or support the resident; - CNA A locked the mechanical lift brakes and lowered the resident to the unlocked brakes on the wheelchair. During an interview on 9/18/19, at 2:58 P.M., CNA A said: - The brakes should be locked on the mechanical lift when lifting and lowering the resident. - The brakes should be on the wheelchair when transferring a resident with a mechanical lift. - They should have guided the resident to the wheelchair and the resident should have not swung in the air. During an interview on 9/19/19, at 10:39 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said: - Staff should follow manufacturer's guidelines. - Staff should not lock the brakes of the mechanical lift when lifting and lowering the resident. - Staff should guide the resident while in the sling and should not swing in the air. - Staff should lock the wheelchair brakes when lifting and lowering a resident with a mechanical lift. 2. Review of the facility's Resident Smoking policy, dated March 2015, showed: - The facility shall establish and maintain safe resident smoking practices. - The staff will review the status of a resident's smoking privileges periodically, and consult as needed with the DON and the attending physician. - Any smoking-related privileges, restrictions, and concerns shall be noted on the care plan. Review of Resident #5's smoking assessment, dated 11/28/16, showed staff assessed the resident as independent with smoking. The resident's medical record showed no smoking assessment for 2017 or 2018. Review of the resident's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed: - Major depressive disorder and recurrent severe psychotic symptoms; - Impairments on both sides lower extremities; - Impaired cognitive functioning; - Uses tobacco. Review of the 6/9/19, care plan showed under Safety Notes: - I do smoke and require staff at side for safety. Observation on 9/18/19, at 8:21 A.M., showed the resident smoking with staff monitoring. During an interview on 9/17/19, at 2:44 P.M., the administrator said she could not find any smoking assessments for 2017 or 2018. She was unsure how they were missed. During an interview on 9/17/19, at 3:03 P.M., the MDS coordinator said she is the one who conducts the annual smoking assessments. She was unable to locate the 2017 or 2018 assessments. The facility does not admit anyone who smokes now but allowed the two residents to continue to smoke. Resident #5 used to be able to smoke independently, but tends to smoke down past the butts, so staff now have to monitor him/her.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 1 life-threatening violation(s), $113,960 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 26 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $113,960 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Missouri. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (3/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Carroll House's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CARROLL HOUSE an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Missouri, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Carroll House Staffed?

CMS rates CARROLL HOUSE's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 63%, which is 17 percentage points above the Missouri average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Carroll House?

State health inspectors documented 26 deficiencies at CARROLL HOUSE during 2019 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 25 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Carroll House?

CARROLL HOUSE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by JAMES & JUDY LINCOLN, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 63 certified beds and approximately 53 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CARROLLTON, Missouri.

How Does Carroll House Compare to Other Missouri Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Missouri, CARROLL HOUSE's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (63%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Carroll House?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Carroll House Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CARROLL HOUSE has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Missouri. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Carroll House Stick Around?

Staff turnover at CARROLL HOUSE is high. At 63%, the facility is 17 percentage points above the Missouri average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Carroll House Ever Fined?

CARROLL HOUSE has been fined $113,960 across 1 penalty action. This is 3.3x the Missouri average of $34,218. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Carroll House on Any Federal Watch List?

CARROLL HOUSE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.