CLARENCE CARE CENTER

111 EAST STREET, CLARENCE, MO 63437 (660) 699-2118
Government - County 60 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
40/100
#239 of 479 in MO
Last Inspection: January 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Clarence Care Center has a Trust Grade of D, indicating it is below average and has some concerning issues. It ranks #239 out of 479 nursing homes in Missouri, placing it in the top half, but it is #2 out of 2 in Shelby County, meaning there is only one local option that is better. The facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 8 in 2021 to 15 in 2024. Staffing is average with a turnover rate of 52%, which is better than the state average of 57%, suggesting some staff stability. While the center has not incurred any fines, there are serious concerns, including a failure to provide adequate care for a resident with dementia, leading to multiple falls and behavioral issues, and food safety practices that did not meet professional standards, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses in the facility's operations.

Trust Score
D
40/100
In Missouri
#239/479
Top 49%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Worse
8 → 15 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Missouri facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Missouri. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
29 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2021: 8 issues
2024: 15 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Near Missouri average (2.5)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 52%

Near Missouri avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

The Ugly 29 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
May 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Refer to event id XF0F13 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of financial exploitation and sexual abuse of one resident, (Resident #401), in a sample of nin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Refer to event id XF0F13 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of financial exploitation and sexual abuse of one resident, (Resident #401), in a sample of nine residents, to the state agency per regulation and facility policy. Multiple employees of the facility had financial interactions with the resident whereby the resident's property was sold by the resident and purchased by staff and the resident hired and paid for services provided by staff. The items sold were sold below current market value and amount paid for services provided were at a higher rate compared to similar types of employment. An allegation was made that Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) I received gifts and was engaged in a sexual relationship with the resident while he/she was employed by the facility. The facility census was 33.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Refer to event id XF0F13 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate allegations of financial exploitation and sexual abuse of one resident, (Resident #401), in a sa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Refer to event id XF0F13 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate allegations of financial exploitation and sexual abuse of one resident, (Resident #401), in a sample of nine residents. Multiple employees of the facility had financial interactions with the resident whereby the resident's property was sold by the resident and purchased by staff and the resident hired and paid for services provided by staff. The items sold were sold below current market value and amount paid for services provided were at a higher rate compared to similar types of employment. The facility did not document all actions related to the allegation, did not interview other residents, and did not document actions taken to prevent further abuse. The facility census was 33.
Jan 2024 13 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0744 (Tag F0744)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (Resident #3), in a sample of eig...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident (Resident #3), in a sample of eight residents, with appropriate care and services to promote the highest possible level of functioning and well being for a resident with dementia, by recognizing and thoroughly addressing the resident's mental and psychosocial needs. The facility did not attempt gradual dose reductions to ensure the resident was on the lowest amount of medication possible, did not document attempts at finding the root cause of behaviors, or evaluate and attempt new interventions, did not provide adequate monitoring of the resident to prevent the resident from leaving the building, from having falls inside and outside the facility (falling in a ditch), or wandering in and out of other resident's rooms to prevent altercations between residents. The resident experienced multiple falls, wandering, agitation, physical altercations with other residents and psychological distress. The facility census was 33. Review of the facility policy Dementia, Clinical Protocol, revised November 2018, showed the following: -As part of the initial assessment, the physician will help identify individuals who have been diagnosed as having dementia and those with otherwise impaired cognition; -The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will evaluate individuals with new or progressive cognitive impairment and help identify symptoms and findings that differentiate dementia from other causes; -Dementia will be differentiated from delirium to the extent possible in residents presenting with impaired cognition. Delirium may be especially problematic in individuals with underlying dementia; -Prominent symptoms of delirium may include reduction in alertness, appetite, attention span, function, and responsiveness; confusion, alternating agitation and lethargy, fluctuation in level of consciousness, hallucinations, and delusions. -The physician will identify individuals taking cholinesterase inhibitors or other medications used to try to stabilize cognitive function, or medications such as antipsychotic medications and mood stabilizers that are commonly ordered to try to manage problematic behavior and disturbed mood; -The staff and physician will evaluate individuals with new or worsening cognitive impairment and behavior and differentiate dementia from other causes (see policy on Delirium/Altered Mental States); -The staff and physician will review the current physical, functional, and psychosocial status of individuals with dementia, and will summarize the individual's condition, related complications, and functional abilities and impairments; -The staff and physician will collaborate to define the decision-making capacity of someone with dementia, including the extent to which the individual can participate in making everyday decisions and in considering healthcare treatment options including life-sustaining treatments; -The staff and physician will collaborate to stage dementia and identify prognosis; -Behavior, Mood and Cognition: a. Individuals with dementia can also have a personality disorder, mental illness, psychosis, delirium, depression, adverse drug reactions (ADRs) or other conditions causing or contributing to impaired cognition and problematic behavior; b. As needed, the physician may obtain a psychiatrist or neurologist consultation to assist with diagnosis, treatment selection, monitoring of responses to treatment, and adjustment of medications; -As needed, the physician will document the basis for conclusions about the category and causes of a resident's dementia or impaired cognition; for example, multi-infarct disease, Alzheimer's disease, Lewy Body Disease (a form of dementia), etc.; -The physician will order any diagnostic tests indicated to clarify the nature or causes of dementia and identify other co-existing or alternative causes of cognitive impairment and problematic behavior; for example: -The staff and physician will determine any relationship between the resident's level of pain and cognitive loss; -For the individual with confirmed dementia, the IDT will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life; -The facility will strive to optimize familiarity through consistent staff-resident assignments; -Resident needs will be communicated to direct care staff through care plan conferences, during change of shift communications and through written documentation (nurses' notes and documentation tools); -Progressive or persistent worsening of symptoms and increased need of staff support will be reported to the IDT; -The physician will help define potential benefits and risks of medical interventions (including cholinesterase inhibitors and other medications used to enhance or stabilize cognition) based on individual risk factors, current conditions, history and details of current symptoms; -The physician will order appropriate interventions to address significant behavioral and psychiatric symptoms, based on pertinent clinical guidelines and consistent with regulatory requirements; -Medications will be targeted to specific symptoms and will be used in the lowest possible doses for the shortest possible time, unless a clinical rationale for higher doses or longer-term use is documented; -If a psychiatric consultant is called to help manage behavioral or psychiatric symptoms in the individual with dementia, the IDT will retain an active role by reviewing and implementing the consultant's recommendations, addressing issues that affect mood, cognition, and function, monitoring for complications related to treatment, and evaluating progress; -The staff will monitor the individual with dementia for changes in condition and decline in function and will report these findings to the physician; -The IDT will adjust interventions and the overall plan depending on the individual's responses to those interventions, progression of dementia, development of new acute medical conditions or complications, changes in resident or family wishes, and other relevant factors; -The physician and staff will review the effectiveness and complications of medications used to try to enhance cognition and manage behavioral and psychiatric symptoms and will adjust, stop, or change such medications as indicated. Review of the Dementia training provided to the facility staff, dated November 2023, showed the following: -Dementia is the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering and reasoning, as well as behavioral issues to such an extent that it interferes with relationships, daily life and activities; -Behaviors can cause patient suffering and are responsible for caregiver stress, institutionalization and hospitalization; -Identification of predisposing and precipitating factors is very important; -Addressing the causes of behavioral disturbances, including comorbid conditions, polypharmacy, pain, personal need, environmental factors, etc., is critical to successful outcomes; -The management approach to behaviors in dementia patients should be structured and thorough; -Ensuring the safety of the patient and others should be paramount; -Assessing the underlying need is critical. Carefully listening to a patient, even when the information is not clear, frequently yields positive results; -Identify the causes of dementia behavior problems; -Examine the behavior objectively. Are the behavior/actions truly a problem? Problem behaviors are typically those that can result in an adverse outcome for the patient or others. For example: can they result in harm?; -Look for patterns that help predict and prevent problem behaviors; -Ask what happened just before the problem behavior started. Did something specific trigger that behavior?; -Is there a certain time of day that seems to be more difficult? Sundown for example? Or bath/shower time?; -Are certain times of the year more difficult? Winter, when days are darker and nights longer, for instance?; -Remember to focus on the why when approaching assessment. Why might they be behaving this way, rather than what they are actually doing; -Understand behavior can often be a reaction to stress or a frustrated attempt to communicate. If you can establish why they're stressed or what is triggering the discomfort, you should be able to resolve the problem behavior more easily; -Are all of their basic human needs being met? Meeting an unmet need can quickly resolve the reason for the behavior in the first place; -A four-step clinical approach to managing behavioral disturbances in dementia patients can be followed: 1. Ensure patient is not in imminent danger to self or others. Chemical and/or physical restraints may be needed in severe cases; 2. Assess for delirium, comorbid medical illness(es), environmental factors or medication causing behavioral disturbances; 3. Look for and treat specific psychiatric syndromes such as depression, delusions and hallucinations, which respond better to pharmacological interventions compared with other behavioral disturbances; 4. Formulate and implement a behavioral plan to identify the antecedents and modify the consequences to improve the behavioral disturbances; -Loneliness is best treated with involvement of the person with the most positive relationship with the patient. That person should interact with the patient in a warm and loving manner. Other interventions found useful are one-to-one interaction with a new caregiver, videos of family, contact with animals and massage therapy; -Boredom is managed by providing stimulation with structured and unstructured activities and accommodating agitated behaviors. Sensory stimulation includes music tailored for the patient, aromatherapy and touch therapy; Reading material can be provided. Provide clothing with buttons, snaps and other articles sewn on for the patients to fiddle with rather than their own clothing. It is important to provide a useful activity, such as folding towels or kneading dough; -Depression, major or minor depression is seen in up to one half of patients with dementia and can be differentiated from apathy by the presence of psychic distress and a low mood state. Unlike most behavioral symptoms, the frequency of depression does not necessarily increase with overall disease severity. Depression frequently goes unrecognized in patients with dementia because of behavioral disturbances and aggression. Depression Interventions: Both pharmacological and nonpharmacologic treatment approaches have been found to be helpful in reducing depression in cognitive impairment and dementia. Pharmacological treatment of depression in patients with dementia, although common, presents some unusual difficulties. Since dementia patients may be less able to communicate, clinicians and caretakers must carefully observe patients for evidence of adverse events when new medications are introduced; -Emotion-Oriented Therapies: The primary aim of emotion-oriented therapies is to fit the therapy to emotional needs of people with dementia, and by doing so, improve quality of life, social functioning and ability to cope with the cognitive, emotional and social consequences of the disease as they subjectively experience them. Examples of emotion-oriented approaches include reminiscence, reality, validation and simulated presence therapy; -Anxiety: Anxiety is more prominent in the earlier phases of the illness and often results from anticipation of potentially stressful circumstances or an adjustment reaction to the increasing dependency associated with progressive functional decline. Interventions are similar to those of depression, but also continue into familiar with anxiety; -Behaviors and interventions: -Sensory, goal: preventing incident-music therapy, aromatherapy, bright light therapy, multisensory stimulation; -Structured Activities, goal: preventing incidents: dancing, exercise, social interaction, music therapy, art therapy, and outdoor walks; -Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Preventing and treating incidents-aroma therapy, reflexology, acupuncture, acupressure, message therapy, and Reiki therapy (touch therapy to reduce stress); -Psychological: preventing incidents-validation therapy, reality orientation, reminiscence therapy, support groups; -Sundowning: A set of neuropsychiatric symptoms occurring in elderly persons with or without dementia at the time of sunset, evening or at night. These behaviors represent a wide variety of symptoms such as confusion, disorientation, anxiety, agitation, aggression, pacing, wandering, resistance to redirection, screaming, yelling, etc. Some of these behaviors may not be specific to Sundowning and can be the manifestation of dementia, delirium, Parkinson's disease and sleep disturbances. Sundowning is distinguished by disruptive behaviors specifically in the late afternoon, evening or at night. Environmental cues can impact a person's Sundowning, adding to their agitation, confusion or aggressiveness. To set up the immediate environment to lessen the symptoms of Sundowning, try the following: Keep window coverings open for maximum exposure to bright light during the day. At dusk, close window coverings and turn lights on to eliminate shadows which can cause confusion. Create a quiet early evening routine include a walk or calming background music. Minimize loud background noises such as banging pots or sudden loud noises. If needed, create some white noise to lessen the impact of sudden noises. Minimize clutter and/or distractions such as the number of people in the room; Monitor TV watching and the images on the screen, which may be upsetting. Structure the day and maintain a stable routine as much as possible to help the patient know what to expect. Give simple single step instructions for meals, bathing, etc. Eliminate caffeine and alcohol especially in the late day. Include outside physical activity and exercise everyday. Keep daytime naps short, and earlier rather than later in the day; -Apathy: Apathy occurs as frequently as aggression or psychosis in dementia patients and is as important a source of caregiver distress . Best characterized as a disturbance of motivation, including loss of interest, fatigue, motor retardation and affective blunting. Responds poorly to current psychotropic medications. Nonpharmacological interventions include; music, intervention group, exercise, multisensory stimulation, pet therapy and massage; -Wandering/pacing is more often a nuisance to other residents and caregivers than to the patient. Using identification bracelets and position alarms, putting alarms and complex locks on doors and avoiding restraints; Outdoor walks and outdoor wandering areas. Finger foods or fanny packs with snacks; -Distracting places for the pacer to sit, relax and rest; -Physical aggression: Physical aggression is found to be associated with depression, psychoses, younger age, use of psychotropic drugs, as well as with dementia itself. In mild-to moderate cases, behavioral interventions are the first line of treatment. In severe persistent cases, atypical antipsychotics or mood stabilizers may be considered for a limited period; -Resistiveness: Resisting care is defined as any patient behavior which prevents or interferes with the care provider performing or assisting with activities of daily living for the patient including bathing, eating, toileting, dressing and grooming. Resistiveness is extremely tiring and burdensome, frequently leading to caregiver burnout, increased staff turnover in long-term care facilities, and even caregiver injuries. Resistiveness is best managed by caregiver education and training in nonpharmacologic interventions including: clear respectful age appropriate tone, intentional listening, follow through with appropriate patient requests; -Delirium: Confusion, seeing things that don't exist (hallucinations, restlessness, agitation or combative behavior, calling out, moaning or making other sounds, being quiet and withdrawn - especially in older adults, slowed movement or lethargy. Patients with dementia have a lower threshold for developing delirium and do so with greater frequency. Delirium should be promptly identified and treated; -Delirium interventions: Social activities, adequate sleep, adherence to a strict schedule, maintenance of proper stimulation level, adequate hydration, reformatting tasks with occupational therapy; -Disruptive vocalization tends to occur along with various other agitated behaviors and is associated with depression, physical discomfort and response to some environmental factors. Occurs during patient care activities, particularly toileting and bathing; -Disruptive vocalization interventions include: music, differential reinforcement, rewarding silence or appropriate requests (when screaming is being reinforced by contingent staff attention and massage therapy. 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet showed the following: -admitted to the facility 2/17/21; -Diagnoses including dementia, insomnia (inability or disruption to sleep) and depressive episodes. Review of the resident's care plan, updated 10/6/22, showed the following: -Diagnoses including psychotic disturbance (perceiving or interpreting interpret reality in a very different way from people around you), mood disturbance, anxiety, cognitive communication deficit, abnormalities of gait and mobility, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care and unsteadiness on feet; -The resident was at risk for falling due to occasional unsteady gait; -Analyze the resident's falls to determine pattern/trend; -Assure the resident was wearing eyeglasses that were clean and in good repair; -Assure the floor is free of glare, liquids and foreign objects; -Encourage the resident to assume a standing position slowly; -Give the resident verbal reminders not to transfer when feeling weak or unsteady without assistance; -Keep the resident's bed in the lowest position with the brakes locked; -Place the resident's call light in reach at all times; -Keep personal items and frequently used items within reach; -Nightlight on in the room at night; -Physical therapy consult for strength training, toning, positioning, transfer training, gait training, mobility devices; -Keep environment free of clutter; -Ensure the resident had proper, well-maintained footwear; -No interventions related to the resident being an elopement risk. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, completed by staff, dated 4/4/23, showed the following: -The resident had moderately impaired cognition; -He/She experienced delusions; -Continuous inattention and disorganized thinking does not fluctuate; -He/She had wandering behavior that occurred one to three days, out of seven days; -He/She had experienced a fall in the last two to six months prior to admission; -Receives antipsychotic and antidepressant medications; -Antipsychotic received routinely, no gradual dose reduction (GDR) (a dose reduction or discontinuation of certain medications) attempt and no physician documentation of a contraindication. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 5/12/23 at 3:41 P.M., showed the following: -The resident was insistent about leaving. He/She suddenly stood and leaned over Registered Nurse (RN) I, started to claw at RN I's neck, and yelled; -RN I alerted the administrator the resident was looking to leave; -The administrator met the resident at the door and tried to redirect the resident; -The resident started banging on the door and yelled. The Certified Medication Technician (CMT) helped the administrator get the resident away from the door; -The resident tried to kick and hit staff and clawed the CMT; -The nurse called the on-call physician, who ordered Haldol (antipsychotic) 5 milligrams (mg)/milliliter (ml), give half a ml=2.5 mg intramuscularly (IM) now and may repeat dose in 30 minutes if needed; -Two staff members held the resident while the medication was administered; -The resident called staff names and tried to hit, kick and bite; -The staff brought the resident to the nurses' station, the administrator observed the resident and kept other residents out of his/her reach. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation, revisions, or review related to the resident's behavior on 5/12/23. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 5/28/23 at 7:40 P.M., showed the resident sat on the bench in the hallway, fell asleep, rolled off the bench and landed on the floor. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation, revisions, or review related to the resident's fall on 5/28/23. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 8/3/23 at 12:30 P.M., showed the following: -The resident went through the front door and the staff walked with the resident; -The nurse attempted to redirect the resident back to the door to come inside, but the resident reached up and hit the nurse in the face and yelled to leave him/her alone and do not touch him/her; -The nurse backed off and walked with the resident a bit more and was able to get the resident to sit down in a chair outside; -A different staff member was able to direct the resident back inside. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation regarding the resident's elopement attempt on 8/3/23. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 8/5/23 at 12:01 P.M., showed during lunch, the resident sat in his/her recliner. He/She attempted to stand up but slid onto the floor. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation related to the resident's fall on 8/5/23. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 8/18/23 at 9:31 P.M., showed the following: -The resident asked staff questions about what to do and was unhappy with any answer; -The resident did not stay with any activity provided such as a book, word search, or television; -The Activity Director gave the resident clothes to fold and the resident sat and angrily folded the clothes; -The resident grabbed RN I's hand as he/she walked towards the resident's room and yelled at RN I for holding his/her hand and dragging him/her down the hallway; -The resident tried to grab an empty supper tray from a kitchen helper's hand and yelled, Let me eat it, I'm hungry!; -Registered Nurse (RN) I tried to distract the resident by asking the resident to follow RN I for a snack, but the resident was not distracted and followed the kitchen helper into the break room and tried to grab the tray; -RN I told the resident the kitchen helper was going to wash the tray and the resident yelled, I know how to wash dishes give it here!; -RN I helped the kitchen aide escape the break room and the kitchen aide grabbed dirty napkins to put in the laundry room and the resident tried to rip the laundry basket out of his/her hands while continuing to yell; -The resident tried to hit RN I while RN I tried to distract the resident from the kitchen helper, and then the resident grabbed the kitchen helper by the shirt sleeve and the kitchen aide walked back to the nurses' station with RN I and the resident to convince the resident to let go; -RN I took sandwiches and snacks out of the refrigerator and the resident yelled that he/she did not want any of it and was not hungry; -The resident called RN I names from across the nurses' station, then grabbed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) papers off the nurses' station, tried to read the papers, saw his/her name on the papers, and became angry; -The CNA tried to get the resident to give up the papers. The resident grabbed the CNA's thumb and tried to bend their thumb backwards; -The CMT was able to get the resident to release the CNA's thumb, but the resident tried to bite both staff members; -A different CNA was able to convince the resident to get dressed for bed in his/her room; -The resident threatened the CNA verbally, but cooperated with dressing and went to bed. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation regarding the resident's behavior or interventions from 8/18/23. Review of the resident's physician orders, dated October 2024, showed the following: -Duloxetine (antidepressant) delayed release 20 milligrams (mg), give one tablet once a day for depressive episodes (original order dated on 7/14/22); -Trazodone (antidepressant) 50 mg, give one tablet at bedtime for insomnia (original order dated 7/14/22); -Risperidone (antipsychotic) 0.5 mg three times daily and 0.25 mg one time daily for dementia (on Risperidone on admission 2/17/21, last increase 6/30/23). Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Inattention and disorganized thinking present fluctuates; -Physical and verbal symptoms directed toward others; -Rejection of care one to three days out of the last seven days; -Wandering 4-6 days out of seven days; -Receives antipsychotics and antidepressants; -Anitpsychotics received routinely, no GDR attempt and no physician documentation of a contraindication. Review of the resident's pharmacy consultation report, dated 10/29/23, showed no GDR was recommended by the pharmacy consultant; no documentation a GDR was declined or documentation provided to continue duloxetine, Trazodone, or risperidone dosages by the physician. Review of the resident's care plan for falls, last reviewed/revised 11/6/23, showed no new interventions or evaluation of current interventions related to falls, behaviors, or elopement attempts. Review of the resident's care plan, updated 11/7/23, showed the following: -The resident had disturbed sleep pattern related to insomnia; -He/She received an order for Trazodone at bedtime, which proved helpful with sleep; -He/She received an antidepressant medication, duloxetine 20 mg daily; -Resident receives antipsychotic medication, risperidone; -Resident will not exhibit signs of drug related adverse reactions: hypotension; sedation; anticholinergic symptoms( dry mouth, constipation, urinary retention, bowel obstruction, dilated pupils, blurred vision, increased heart rate, and decreased sweating); extrapyramidal symptoms (dysfunction such as dystonia (continuous spasms and muscle contractions), akathisia (may manifest as motor restlessness), Parkinsonism characteristic symptoms such as rigidity, bradykinesia (slowness of movement), tremor, and tardive dyskinesia (TD) (irregular, jerky movements); -Monitor behavior and response to medication and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) (a rating scale to measure involuntary movements known as tardive dyskinesia (TD) (a disorder that sometimes develops as a side effect of long-term treatment with neuroleptic (antipsychotic) medications)) and functional status on a regular basis, -Quantitatively and objectively document behaviors; -Under physician's order, attempt gradual dose reductions; -The pharmacy consultant reviewed as a regularly scheduled task. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 11/9/23 at 5:30 P.M., showed the staff found the resident in a room across the hall from the resident's room, sitting on the floor. Review of the resident's care plan did not show revision, updates or reviews after the resident's fall on 11/9/23. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 12/21/23 at 6:20 A.M., showed the resident yelled out and staff found him/her sitting on the floor in his/her room with his/her pants around his/her thighs. Review of the resident's care plan did not show revision, updates or reviews after the residents fall on 12/21/23. Review of the resident's nursing notes, dated 12/27/23 at 10:24 P.M., showed the following: -The resident walked to the front door and demanded to leave the building; -He/She hit and kicked staff, yelled loudly, and took over 25 minutes to convince the resident to go elsewhere. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation regarding the resident's behavior or interventions from 12/27/23. Review of the resident's physician orders, dated January 2024, showed the following: -Duloxetine delayed release 20 mg, give one tablet by mouth once a day for depressive episodes; -Trazodone 50 mg, give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for insomnia; -Risperidone 0.5 mg three times daily and 0.25 mg one time daily. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident had severe cognitive impairment; -He/She did not have symptoms of depression; -He/She received antipsychotics and antidepressants; -Antipsychotics were received routinely; -A GDR had not been attempted and the physician did not document a clinical contraindication to attempting a GDR. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 1/30/24 at 1:46 A.M., showed staff often provided one-on-one oversight when the resident was confused because he/she tried to leave or entered other resident rooms. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation regarding the resident's behaviors with interventions for 1/30/24. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident had severely impaired cognition; -He/She experienced delusion, physical behaviors and verbal behaviors; -He/She rejected care that occurred one to three days during seven-day review; -He/She had wandering behavior that occurred four to six days, but less then daily; -He/She had two falls without injury since last assessment; -He/She had a wanderguard alarm; -Receives antipsychotics and antidepressants; -Anitpsychotics received routinely, no GDR attempt and no physician documentation of a contraindication. Review of the resident's elopement risk assessment, dated 2/13/24, showed the resident was at risk for elopement and staff placed a wanderguard censor (censor that sounds an alarm and doors to lock worn by residents). Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 2/13/24 at 2:06 P.M., showed the following: -Resident has been up and very active this shift; -Multiple attempts to go out front door, convinced the resident he/she drove here and he/she can leave when he/she wants to; -Difficult to redirect, needing extra supervision. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/13/24 at 10:55 P.M., showed the following: -Resident has continued to be restless all shift; -Several more attempts to leave the facility and open doors. The resident's care plan did not include updates, or new information with the residents exit seeking and behaviors on 2/13/24. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/14/24 at 10:25 P.M., showed the following: -Resident is very confused & uncooperative at times with care; -Roams in hallway frequently; -Has wanderguard (bracelet that triggers the doors to lock and alarm) and exit seeks at times. The resident's care plan did not include updates, or new information with the residents exit seeking and behaviors on 2/14/24. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/16/24 at 3:57 P.M., showed yesterday the resident was restless and did attempt to exit the front door several times. The resident was difficult to redirect except he/she wants to hold hands with staff and go anywhere they are. This morning the resident was in the dining room and repeatedly yelling, very loudly, I am hungry feed me now!. He/She has continued to do the same thing throughout the day in different scenarios. After breakfast he/she was repeatedly screaming, I am cold, get me a blanket! and kept increasing his/her volume even after staff told him/her they would get blanket, he/she continued to scream until the blanket arrived. The resident's care plan did not include updates, or new information with the residents exit seeking or behaviors on 2/16/24. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/18/24 at 6:40 P.M., showed staff notified the resident
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of financial exploitation and sexual abuse of one resident, (Resident #401), in a sample of nine residents, to the state...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of financial exploitation and sexual abuse of one resident, (Resident #401), in a sample of nine residents, to the state agency per regulation and facility policy. Multiple employees of the facility had financial interactions with the resident whereby the resident's property was sold by the resident and purchased by staff and the resident hired and paid for services provided by staff. The items sold were sold below current market value and amount paid for services provided were at a higher rate compared to similar types of employment. An allegation was made that Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) I received gifts and was engaged in a sexual relationship with the resident while he/she was employed by the facility. The facility census was 33. Review of the facility's policy, Abuse/Neglect or Misappropriation of Resident Property, undated, showed the following: -Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident; -Exploitation means taking advantage of a resident for personal gain through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats, or coercion; -Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent; -Policy Statement: No abuse of our residents will be tolerated and any suspected abuse is to be reported immediately to the supervisor in charge; -Procedure Statement: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for education, prevention, identifying, reporting and investigation of any neglect and abuse of the elderly; -Any staff member should immediately report allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment. All allegations will be reported to the State Agency within two hours; -Exploitation/financial abuse: sudden, unjustified selling of property missing/stolen money or property radical changes in handling personal/financial affairs specific complaints by resident; -All incidents of abuse, neglect, and exploitation will immediately be reported to the State Survey Agency; -The policy did not include anything about staff relationships with residents. Review of the facility's Employee Handbook, undated, showed the following: -Employees of the facility will be considered as their primary employment, jobs outside of the facility cannot conflict with the facility duties; -Tips such as money, gifts, flower, etc. will not be accepted by any individual employee from a resident, family member, or visitor without approval from the Administrator; -This allows each resident to receive equal treatment in his/her care; -An employee receiving personal property or anything with a value to ten dollars ($10) or more from a resident shall make a written statement giving the date of receipt, estimated value and the name of the person making the gift; -The handbook did not include anything about relationships with residents. 1. Review of Resident #401's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 2/14/24, showed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of an undated, untitled facility investigation, showed the following: -4/30/24: anonymous employee F and anonymous employee G reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) they had concerns that one of our residents was being taken advantage of and that anonymous employee H has it on video tape and showed them that Resident #401 and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) I were in the church parking lot together moving things from his/her truck to his/hers and the resident gave CNA I money; -5/1/24: anonymous employee J reported that he/she was told that CNA I and the resident had been sleeping together since December, and the resident bought CNA I a diamond necklace for Christmas; -On 5/7/24: DON interviewed CNA B. CNA B said he/she heard on the floor that Resident #401 and CNA I were sleeping together but did not know for sure. During an interview on 5/15/24, at 1:20 P.M., CNA I said the following: -He/She was terminated from the facility because he/she and the resident hugged each other goodnight; -He/She denied a sexual relationship with the resident; -He/She gave the resident rides to his/her house, and went to the resident's house to help him/her arrange new furniture; this was both before and after he/she was terminated; -He/She met the resident in the church parking lot because he/she asked him/her to meet him/her; this was after he/she was terminated; -The resident gave him/her $20.00 for fuel for taking him/her to his/her house; this was after he/she was terminated; -He/She denied receiving a diamond necklace from the resident. Review of CNA I's employee file showed his/her last day worked was 4/3/24; the employee was terminated on 4/11/24. No documented reason for the termination. 2. Review of an undated, untitled facility investigation, showed the following: -Date unknown-It was reported by anonymous employee E that the housekeeping supervisor asked Resident #401 what he/she was going to be doing with his/her house and that his/her family member (Dietary Aide C) was struggling financially and they were looking for a place to live. Anonymous employee E said Resident #401 was not only letting them live there rent free but he/she was paying for their cable and told them that they could do whatever they wanted to it and just send him/her the bill; -4/25/24: Resident #401 told the Director of Nurses (DON) and the administrator that he/she was renting his/her house to two people (including Dietary Aide C) for free and he/she bought new furniture and a new television for the house too. -5/1/24: anonymous employee J reported that while giving Resident #401 a shower, the resident asked him/her how much he/she paid for rent. Anonymous employee J told the resident $700.00 and the resident replied I'm letting these two (people) live on my 40 acres for free. Resident #40 said he/she just wanted to help the two (people) who were struggling. -The DON and the administrator interviewed the housekeeping supervisor on 5/6/24. The housekeeping supervisor said she, Dietary Aide C, and CNA D went to the resident's house and had a conversation with the resident about renting it to Dietary Aide C and CNA D. The housekeeping supervisor said the resident offered the rent to be free but the housekeeping supervisor said they were going to pay him/her $380.00 a month since that is what they were currently paying where they currently lived. The housekeeping supervisor was having Resident #401 open an account at the bank across the street so the tenants could deposit the money for rent right into the resident's account. The housekeeping supervisor was going to be responsible for drawing up a rental contract and make it year to year not month to month and have someone at the bank notarize it, but he/she had not got it done yet. The resident's house was three bedroom, one and a half bath and on 40 acres; -The DON and the administrator interviewed Dietary Aide C on 5/6/24. Dietary Aide C said he/she overheard the resident talking about renting his/her house and he/she told the resident he/she was interested. Dietary Aide C said there was no rental contract yet. He/She did not know how much the rent would be, he/she guessed around $350 a month since that is what he/she was currently paying for rent. Dietary Aide C said he/she did not know the resident prior to him/her living at the facility; -On 5/9/24: DON and the administrator interviewed Resident #401. He/She said the two (people) were going to rent his/her house for $50.00 a month and they were going to pay the utilities. During an interview on 5/15/24 at 10:38 A.M., CNA D said the following: -He/She and Dietary Aide C were going to rent the resident's house; -He/She and Dietary Aide C cleaned parts of the house and tore out carpets the resident wanted to replace; -The resident said rent would be free, but they told the resident they would have to pay him/her. 3. Review of an undated, untitled facility investigation, showed the following: -4/24/24: anonymous employee E reported that Registered Nurse (RN) A was going to look at the resident's camper and was going to be making payments on it; -4/25/24: Resident #401 told the DON and the administrator he/she was selling his/her camper for $5,000.00 to a nurse (name not documented) that worked at the facility; -On 5/6/24: DON and the administrator interviewed RN A. RN A said on 5/4/24 he/she bought the resident's camper for $4,000.00. -On 5/9/24: DON and the administrator interviewed Resident #401. He/She said he/she sold his/her camper to RN A. Originally, he/she wanted $7,000.00 for his/her camper but he/she took $4,000.00 cash for the camper. During an interview on 5/15/24, at 11:32 A.M., RN A said the following: -He/She bought the resident's camper for $4,000.00 cash; -The resident originally wanted $6,000.00 for the camper but agreed to sell it to him/her for $4,000.00. During an interview on 5/15/24 at 11:29 A.M., Housekeeper L said the following: -The resident hired him/her and another employee to clean his/her house; -The resident was there while he/she cleaned his/her house; -They worked for the resident two days for four to six hours each day; -The resident paid him/her $100.00 in cash for each day he/she worked for him/her. During an interview on 5/15/24 at 11:04 A.M., Housekeeper M said the following: -The resident hired him/her to clean his/her house; -He/She and HK L worked together; -The resident paid each of them $100.00 each for each day they worked; he/she paid them with a check; -They worked for about six hours each day; -They moved out furniture, scrubbed walls and floors and shampooed the carpets; -The resident and his/her friend were there while they worked. During an interview on 5/13/24 at 9:50 A.M., Resident #401 said the following: -The facility fired CNA I for being in a relationship with him/her; -The resident denied a sexual relationship with CNA I and denied giving him/her a diamond necklace; -He/She had given CNA I $30.00 for gas money because CNA I had given the resident a ride to his/her house from the facility; (he/she could not recall if this was before or after CNA I was terminated); -He/She paid a couple of employees who work at the facility to clean his/her house; -Employees who work at the facility approached him/her about renting his/her house; -He/She was going to rent his/her house to an employee; the employee was going to pay $50.00 a month. During an interview on 5/13/24 at 9:35 A.M., the DON said the following: -Staff had reported (date unknown as dates were not kept track of before 4/23/24) an inappropriate (sexual or romantic) relationship between CNA I and the resident; -CNA I had been terminated by the facility on 4/11/24 for having an inappropriate (sexual or romantic) relationship with the resident; -RN A purchased a camper from the resident for less than fair market value; -He/She reported and discussed all the allegations to the Administrator; -The resident hired housekeeping employees to clean his/her house; She thought they took money and didn't fully do the job; -The resident was going to rent his/her house to employees but she and administrator intervened and told the staff it was not appropriate. During an interview on 5/13/24, at 9:40 A.M. the administrator said the following: -The facility did not report RN A purchasing the camper to DHSS because they facility could not properly establish the value of the camper; -The facility consulted the Ombudsman regarding the sexual relationship and financial transactions with all the employees; -CNA I had been terminated for an inappropriate relationship with the resident; -It had been reported CNA I and the resident were in a sexual relationship, but he only had an eyewitness account of a hug. He did not feel he had enough evidence to report it as sexual abuse; -Both employees were terminated because they violated the code of conduct in the employee handbook; -He heard about concerns related to the rent and cleaning of the resident's house but didn't know the details. MO235963 MO234780
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate allegations of financial exploitation and sexual abuse of one resident, (Resident #401), in a sample of nine residents. M...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate allegations of financial exploitation and sexual abuse of one resident, (Resident #401), in a sample of nine residents. Multiple employees of the facility had financial interactions with the resident whereby the resident's property was sold by the resident and purchased by staff and the resident hired and paid for services provided by staff. The items sold were sold below current market value and amount paid for services provided were at a higher rate compared to similar types of employment. The facility did not document all actions related to the allegation, did not interview other residents, and did not document actions taken to prevent further abuse. The facility census was 33. Review of the facility's undated policy, Abuse/Neglect or Misappropriation of Resident Property, showed the following: -Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident; -Exploitation means taking advantage of a resident for personal gain through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats, or coercion; -Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent; -No abuse of our residents will be tolerated and any suspected abuse is to be reported immediately to the supervisor in charge; -Procedure Statement: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for education, prevention, identifying, reporting and investigation of any neglect and abuse of the elderly; -The following are some possible signs of abuse, neglect and/or exploitation. No single item or group of items is conclusive evidence of abuse, neglect or exploitation. However, any of these occurrences warrants further investigation; -Exploitation/financial abuse: sudden, unjustified selling of property missing/stolen money or property radical changes in handling personal/financial affairs specific complaints by resident; -It is the facility's responsibility to conduct a full investigation of all allegations concerning abuse, neglect, injuries or unknown sources and misappropriation of funds. It may be necessary to take statements from employees, visitors and/or residents who may have witnessed such incidents. If the nature of the allegation is of serious nature then it is recommended that statements be notarized when possible; -INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: 1. Remove alleged perpetrator from resident area; 2. Notify Administrator and Director of Nursing; 3. Take statements from all staff involved. Take pictures. 4. All information will be thoroughly investigate and documented and will be forwarded to appropriate authorities as indicated; 5. All information will be held in strictest confidence to protect the privacy of our residents and their families; -With each occurrence the facility will analyze it's policies and procedures to determine what changes are needed, if any, to prevent further occurrences. 1. Review of Resident #401's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally required assessment completed by staff, dated 2/14/24, showed the resident was cognitively intact. 2. Review of the undated, untitled facility's investigation, showed the following: -4/30/24 (no time): anonymous employee F and anonymous Employee G reported to the Director of Nursing (DON) they had concerns that one of our residents was being taken advantage of and that anonymous employee H has it on video tape and showed them that Resident #401 and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) I were in the church parking lot together moving things from his/her truck to his/hers and the resident gave CNA I money; there was no documentation of a further interview with anonymous employees F, G or H, rather just the reporting; -5/1/24 (no time): anonymous employee J reported that he/she was told that CNA I and the resident had been sleeping together since December, and the resident bought CNA I a diamond necklace for Christmas; there was no documentation of a further interview with anonymous employee J, rather just the reporting; -On 5/7/24 (no time): the DON interviewed CNA B. CNA B said he/she heard on the floor that Resident #401 and CNA I were sleeping together but doesn't know for sure. -No written statements were attached to the investigation. During an interview on 5/15/24, at 1:20 P.M., CNA I said the following: -He/She was terminated from the facility because he/she and the resident hugged each other goodnight; -He/she denied a sexual relationship with the resident; -He/She has given the resident rides to his/her house, and went to the resident's house to help him/her arrange the new furniture; he/she said this was both before and after he/she had been terminated; -He/She met the resident in the church parking lot because he/she asked him/her to meet him/her; this would have been after he/she was terminated; -The resident gave him/her $20.00 for fuel for taking him/her to his/her house; this would have been after he/she was terminated; -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement. Review of CNA I's employee file showed his/her last day worked was 4/3/24; the employee was terminated on 4/11/24; no documented reason why. 3. Review of the undated, untitled facility's investigation, showed the following: -Date unknown (no time): It was reported by anonymous employee E that the housekeeping supervisor asked Resident #401 what he/she was going to be doing with his/her house and that his/her family member (dietary aide C) was struggling financially and they were looking for a place to live. Anonymous employee E also said Resident #401 was not only letting them live there rent free but he/she was paying for their cable and told them that they could do whatever they wanted to it and just send him/her the bill; -4/25/24 (no time): Resident #401 said to the DON and the administrator that he/she was renting his/her house to two people (dietary aide C and former CNA D) for free and he/she bought new furniture and a new television for the house too; -5/1/24 (no time): anonymous employee J reported that while giving Resident #401 a shower, the resident asked him/her how much he/she paid for rent. Anonymous employee J told the resident $700.00 and he/she replied, I'm letting these two people live on my 40 acres for free. Resident #401 said he/she just wanted to help two people who were struggling; -The DON and the administrator interviewed the housekeeping supervisor on 5/6/24. The housekeeping supervisor said she, Dietary Aide C, and CNA D went to the resident's house and had a conversation the resident about renting it to Dietary Aide C and CNA D. The housekeeping supervisor said the resident offered the rent to be free but the housekeeping supervisor said they were going to pay him/her $380.00 a month since that is what they were currently paying where they lived now. The resident's house was a three bedroom, one and a half bath and on 40 acres; -The DON and the administrator interviewed Dietary Aide C on 5/6/24 (no time). Dietary aide C said he/she overheard the resident talking about renting his/her house and he/she told the resident he/she was interested. Dietary Aide C said there is no rental contract yet. He/She did not know how much the rent would be, he/she guessed around $350.00 a month since that is what he/she is currently paying for rent. Dietary Aide C said he/she did not know the resident prior to him/her living at the facility; -On 5/9/24 (no time): DON and the administrator interviewed Resident #401. He/She said the two people were going to rent his/her house for $50.00 a month and they were going to pay the utilities. -No written statements were attached to the investigation. During an interview on 5/14/24, at 1:47 P.M., Dietary Aide C said the following: -He/She was going to rent the resident's house but it is not happening now; -He/She asked the resident what he/she was going to do with his/her house and we were working out a price for rent; -They had not settled on a price; -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement. 4. Review of the undated, untitled facility's investigation, showed the following: -4/24/24 (no time): Anonymous employee E reported that Registered Nurse (RN) A was going to look at the resident's camper and was going to be making payments on it; there was no documentation of any additional interview with anonymous employees E, rather just the reporting; -4/25/24 (no time): Resident #401 told the DON and the administrator that he/she was selling his/her camper for $5,000.00 to a nurse (name not documented) that worked at the facility; -On 5/6/24 (no time): DON and the administrator interviewed RN A. RN A said that on 5/4/24 he/she bought the resident's camper for $4,000.00; -On 5/9/24 (no time): DON and the administrator interviewed Resident #401. He/She said he/she sold his/her camper to RN A. Originally, he/she wanted $7,000.00 for his/her camper but he/she took $4,000.00 cash for the camper; -No written statements were attached to the investigation. During an interview on 5/14/24, at 1:09 P.M. Certified Medication Technician (CMT) B said the following: -He/She heard RN A say he/she was going to buy the resident's camper; -He/She only heard rumors about other financial transactions with the resident; -He/She had not been interviewed by the facility regarding these allegations; -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement. During an interview on 5/15/24, at 11:32 A.M., RN A said the following: -He/She bought the resident's camper for $4,000.00 cash; -The resident originally wanted $6,000.00 for the camper but agreed to sell it to him/her for $4,000.00. During an interview on 5/15/24, at 11:29 A.M., Housekeeper L said the following: -The resident hired him/her and another employee to clean his/her house; -They worked for the resident for two days for four to six hours each day; -The resident paid him/her $100.00 in cash for each day he/she worked for him/her; -He/She had not been interviewed by the facility regarding these allegations; -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement. During an interview on 5/15/24, at 11:04 A.M., Housekeeper M said the following: -The resident hired him/her to clean his/her house; -He/She and housekeeper L worked together; -The resident paid each of them $100.00 each day they worked; he/she paid them with a check; -They worked for about six hours each day; -He/She had not been interviewed by the facility regarding these allegations; -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement. During an interview on 5/13/24, at 2:48 P.M., anonymous employee H said the following: -He/She saw CNA I take a large box from the resident's truck; -CNA I has picked the resident up at the facility to take the resident to his/her house. -He/She gave the DON pictures and a video; -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement. During an interview on 5/13/24, at 1:05 P.M., anonymous employee F said the following: -He/She saw pictures another staff member took of CNA I taking items from the resident's truck and putting them into his/her truck; -RN A said he/she bought the resident's camper and got a good deal; -Dietary aide C said he/she was getting a good deal on rent on the resident's house. -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement. During an interview on 5/14/24, at 2:09 P.M., anonymous employee G said the following: -CNA I takes advantage of others' kindness; -He/She will tell everyone how hard he/she has it and takes whatever he/she can get; -The resident has said he/she has helped CNA I with a few things but does not say specifically what he/she has helped him/her with; -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement. During an interview on 5/14/24, at 1:11 P.M., anonymous employee J said the following: -He/She heard from a friend not employed with the facility that a facility staff member was having a relationship with a staff member; -The resident told him/her that he/she was letting a staff member and a former staff member live in his/her house for free; -A staff member also told him/her that CNA I was in a sexual relationship with the resident since December; -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement; -He/She had not been inserviced on abuse, neglect or exploitation recently. During an interview on 5/14/24, at 1:56 P.M., the housekeeping manager said the following: -He/She had approached the resident about his/her adult child , Dietary Aide C, renting the resident's property; -The resident offered it for free, but he/she told the resident they had to be legit; -He/She had not been asked to provide a written statement. During an interview on 5/13/24, at 9:35 A.M., the DON said the following: -Staff (not named) had reported (date unknown) an inappropriate (sexual or romantic) relationship between CNA I and the resident; staff reported CNA I and the resident hugged on his/her bed in his/her room and had concerns of sexual abuse; -CNA I had been terminated by the facility on 4/11/24 for having an inappropriate (romantic or sexual) relationship with the resident; -RN A had purchased a camper from the resident for less than fair market value; -He/She reported and discussed all the allegations to the Administrator when they had been reported to her; she was instructed to investigate the allegations; she felt the allegations were exploitation and abuse; -The resident hired housekeeping employees to clean his/her house; she wasn't sure of date when she became aware of this; she felt they were overpaid and didn't finish the job they were paid for; -The resident was going to rent his/her house to employees but she and the administrator intervened and told the staff it was not appropriate. -She said she was questioning staff but did not get statements during the investigation. During an interview on 5/13/24 at 9:40 A.M., the administrator said the following: -The facility did not report RN A purchasing the camper to the state agency because they facility could not properly establish the value of the camper; -The facility consulted the Ombudsman about the romantic/sexual relationship and all the financial transactions between the resident and employees; -CNA I had been terminated for an inappropriate (romantic/sexual) relationship with the resident; -It had been reported as a possible sexual relationship; he had not reported the allegation because he did not feel like he had enough evidence; -Both employees (RN A and CNA I) were terminated because they violated the code of conduct in the employee handbook. -He heard about concerns related to rent and cleaning of the resident's house but didn't know the details; -A thorough investigation would include documented interviews with dates and times; -He felt like he did not have enough cause to investigate or report the allegations. MO235963 MO234780
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and provide a copy of a baseline care plan, con...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and provide a copy of a baseline care plan, consistent with the resident's specific conditions, needs, and risks that provide effective person-centered care that met professional standards of quality of care within 48 hours of admission to the facility, for two residents (Residents #283 and #300), in a review of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's policy, Baseline Care Plans, dated March 2022, showed the following: -A baseline plan of care to meeting the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission; -The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality of care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident including, but not limited to the following: a. Initial goals based on admission orders and discussion with the resident/representative; b. Physician orders; c. Dietary orders; d. Therapy services; e. Social services; f. Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), if applicable. 1. Review of Resident #283's face sheet showed the following: -He/She admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -He/She had a responsible party; -Diagnoses included Parkinsonism (collection of movement symptoms that include slowness, stiffness, tremor, and balance issues), bilateral leg atherosclerosis (stiffening and thickening of blood vessels that can restrict blood flow), dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), chronic pain , constipation, hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), vitamin deficiency, incontinence, overactive bladder, atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), cerebral infarction (happen when the blood supply to the brain is blocked for a short time), and repeated falls. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/15/24, showed the following: -The resident had moderately impaired cognition; -He/She had inattention and disorganized thinking that fluctuated; -He/She had physical and verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others; -He/She rejected care one to three days during assessment; -He/She required supervision with eating; -He/She required setup assistance with oral hygiene; -He/She required maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper and lower body dressing, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, sit to stand, and transfers; -He/She required moderate assistance with personal hygiene, rolling left and right in bed; -He/She used a wheelchair for locomotion; -He/She was occasionally incontinent of bladder and bowel; -He/She had a fall within the last month and two to six months prior to admission; -He/She received an anticoagulant (medicine that help prevent blood clots). Review of the resident's medical record on 1/25/24 showed no documentation staff developed a baseline care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission. 2. Review of Resident #300's face sheet showed the following: -He/She admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -He/She had a responsible party; -Diagnoses included: Type II diabetes mellitus (long-term medical condition in which your body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in unusual blood sugar levels), generalized anxiety disorder (involves a persistent feeling of anxiety or dread that interferes with how a person lives their life), glaucoma (group of eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of the eye called the optic nerve), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms (condition in which the prostate gland is enlarged and not cancerous), and depression (common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how a person feels, the way he/she thinks and how he/she acts). Review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident was cognitively intact; -He/She had verbal behavioral symptoms towards others occurring four to six days, but less than daily; -He/She rejected care one to three days during the assessment; -He/She was independent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene, rolling left and right in bed, sitting to lying, lying to sitting, sit to stand, transfers, and ambulation; -He/She received an antidepressant, anticoagulant, antibiotic, and diuretic. Review of the resident's medical record on 1/25/24 showed no documentation staff developed a baseline care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission. 3. During an interview on 1/30/24 at 12:45 P.M., the Care Plan Coordinator said the following: -He/She was responsible for completing the baseline care plans; -Baseline care plans were to be completed within 48 hours of admission; -He/She guessed the baseline care plan was not completed for Resident #283 or Resident #300, but both were supposed to be completed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians orders for two residents (Residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physicians orders for two residents (Residents #20 and #11), in a review of 13 sampled residents, by not providing nutritional supplements as ordered. The facility census was 30. 1. Review of Resident #20's weight record showed the following: -Weight on 6/1/23 was 107.9 pounds (lbs); -Weight on 12/4/23 was 96.2 lbs (a 10.59 % weight loss in six months). Review of the resident's care plan, last revised 11/7/23, showed the no documentation the resident had weight loss or was to receive a house supplement (a liquid nutritional supplement) three times a day (as ordered on 3/8/22). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument to be completed by the facility, dated 12/9/23, showed no weight loss or gain. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated January 2024, showed an order for house supplement three times daily (original order dated 3/8/22). Review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated January 2024, showed no documentation the resident received house supplements three times daily. Observation on 1/23/24 at 12:00 P.M. showed the resident sat at the dining table with his/her lunch tray. The resident did not receive a house supplement during the meal. Observations of the resident on 1/24/24 showed the following: -At 7:06 A.M., the resident sat at the dining room table with a glass of milk and a cup of coffee. The resident did not have a house supplement; -At 7:20 A.M., the resident ate from his/her meal tray. The resident did not receive a house supplement with his/her meal. 2. Review of Resident #11's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Diagnoses of type II diabetes mellitus (problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel) with neuropathy (damage to the peripheral nerves, and signs may include numb sensation); -He/She had a diabetic foot ulcer; -The staff implemented nutrition or hydration interventions to manage skin problems. Review of the resident's care plan, updated 12/21/23, showed the following: -The dietary staff as well as nursing staff should encourage dietary compliance; -The care plan did not include Arginaid (powder formulated for nutritional support) for wound healing (as ordered on 3/7/23). Review of the resident's physician orders, dated January 2024, showed Arginaid powder in packet 4.5 gram/156 milligrams (mg)/9.2 gram (g), administer one packet orally once a day (started 3/7/23). Review of the resident's registered dietician (RD) note, dated 1/19/24 at 1:06 P.M., showed the following: -The RD followed up on the resident's open areas; -The staff administered Arginaid daily; -The staff continue current supplements as tolerated. Review of the resident's electronic medication administration record, dated January 2024, showed Arginaid was not listed on the MAR for staff to administer. 3. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 9:17 A.M., the Care Plan Coordinator said the dietary department had stopped providing house supplements as they said it was too confusing and nursing was to provide the house supplements now. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 11:40 A.M., the dietary manager said dietary staff did not provide nutritional supplements of any kind. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 11:45 A.M., Certified Medication Technician (CMT) J said he/she did not have Resident #20 on his/her list of residents who received house supplements. He/She did not provide house supplements to the resident. If a resident has a supplement ordered, it will show up on his/her computer and he/she would know to give the supplement. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 4:20 P.M., the DON said the following: -She would expect staff to follow physician orders; -Staff should give supplements as ordered; -She was not aware Resident #20 was to receive house supplements; -Nursing staff were responsible for transcribing orders from the POS to the MAR.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two residents (R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two residents (Resident #283 and #300), and failed to update interventions in the resident's care plan to reflect current care needs for five residents (Residents #3, #4, #13, #20, and #21), in a review of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility policy, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, revised March 2022, showed the following: -The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument) assessment (admission, annual or significant change in status), and no more than 21 days after admission. -Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' condition change; -The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. When the desired outcome is not met; c. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. At least quarterly in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS assessment. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.17.1, Chapter 4, revised October 2019, showed the following: -The care plan is driven not only by identified resident issues and/or conditions but also by a resident ' s unique characteristics, strengths, and needs; -A care plan that is based on a thorough assessment, effective clinical decision making and is compatible with current standards of clinical practice can provide a strong basis for optimal approaches to quality of care and quality of life needs of individual residents; -A well developed and executed assessment and care plan: 1. Looks at each resident as a whole human being with unique characteristics and strengths; 2. Views the resident in a distinct functional area for the purpose of gaining knowledge about the resident ' s function status (MDS); 3. Gives the interdisciplinary team (IDT) a common understanding of the resident; 4. Re-groups the information gathered to identify possible issues and/or conditions that the resident may have (i.e., triggers); 5. Provides additional clarity of potential issues and/or conditions by looking at possible causes and risks (CAA process); 6. Develops and implements an interdisciplinary care plan based on the assessment of information gathered throughout the RAI process, with necessary monitoring and follow-up; 7. Reflects the resident's/resident representative's input, goals, and desired outcomes; 8. Provides information regarding how the causes and risks associated with issues and/or conditions can be addressed to provide for a resident's highest practicable level of well-being (care planning); 9. Re-evaluates the resident's status at prescribed intervals (i.e., quarterly, annually, or if a significant change in status occurs) using the RAI and then modifies the individualized care plan as appropriate and necessary; 10. Reviews and revises the current care plan, 1. Review of Resident #283's face sheet showed the following: -He/She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -He/She had a responsible party; -Diagnoses included Parkinsonism (collection of movement symptoms that include slowness, stiffness, tremor, and balance issues), bilateral leg atherosclerosis (stiffening and thickening of blood vessels that can restrict blood flow), dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), chronic pain (pain lasts months or years and interferes with your daily activities), constipation, hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), vitamin deficiency, incontinence, overactive bladder, atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), cerebral infarction (happen when the blood supply to the brain is blocked for a short time), and repeated falls. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/15/24, showed the following: -The resident had moderately impaired cognition; -He/She had inattention and disorganized thinking that fluctuated; -He/She had physical and verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others; -He/She rejected care one to three days during assessment; -He/She required supervision with eating; -He/She required setup assistance with oral hygiene; -He/She required maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper and lower body dressing, lying to sitting on the side of the bed, sit to stand, and transfers; -He/She required moderate assistance with personal hygiene, rolling left and right in bed; -He/She used a wheelchair for locomotion; -He/She was occasionally incontinent of bladder and bowel; -He/She had a fall within the last month and two to six months prior to admission; -He/She received an anticoagulant (medicine that help prevent blood clots). Review of the resident's medical record on 1/25/24 showed no documentation staff developed a comprehensive care plan for the resident. 2. Review of Resident #300's face sheet showed the following: -He/She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -He/She had a responsible party; -Diagnoses included Type II diabetes mellitus (long-term medical condition in which your body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in unusual blood sugar levels), generalized anxiety disorder (involves a persistent feeling of anxiety or dread that interferes with how a person lives their life), glaucoma (group of eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of the eye called the optic nerve), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms (condition in which the prostate gland is enlarged and not cancerous), and depression (common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how a person feels, the way he/she thinks and how he/she acts). Review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident was cognitively intact; -He/She had verbal behavioral symptoms towards others occurring four to six days, but less than daily; -He/She rejected care one to three days during the assessment; -He/She was independent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene, rolling left and right in bed, sitting to lying, lying to sitting, sit to stand, transfers, and ambulation; -He/She received an antidepressant, anticoagulant, antibiotic, and diuretic. Review of the resident's medical record on 1/25/24 showed no documentation staff developed a comprehensive care plan for the resident. 3. Review of Resident #13's face sheet, showed the following: -He/She was admitted on [DATE]; -He/She had a responsible party; -Diagnoses included dementia ((group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), supraventricular tachycardia (an irregularly fast or erratic heartbeat that affects the heart's upper chambers), cognitive communication deficit (reduced awareness and ability to initiate and effectively communicate needs), viral pneumonia, respiratory syncytial virus (common respiratory virus that infects the nose, throat, lungs, and breathing passages), constipation, hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (heart problems that occur because of high blood pressure that is present over a long time), primary generalized osteoarthritis (common form of osteoarthritis that develops in your joints over time), and essential hypertension. Review of the resident's care plan, last updated 7/25/23, showed the following: -The resident was at risk for falling; -The staff was to assure the floor was free of glare, liquids, foreign objects; -The staff were to encourage the resident to assume a standing position slowly; -The staff were to encourage the resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips, handrails, etc.; -The staff were to keep the resident's call light in reach at all times; -The staff were to keep the resident's personal items and frequently used items within reach; -The staff were to leave the resident's night light on in room; -The staff were to ensure the resident was provided proper, well-maintained footwear; -The staff were to provide the resident an environment free of clutter; -The staff were to provide the resident toileting assistance on routine and PRN rounds; -The staff taught the resident safety measures. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 9/17/23 at 6:20 P.M., showed the following: -The resident walked up and down the hallways, exit seeking and setting off alarms; -He/She had difficulty understanding where his/her spouse was and thought the spouse was outside waiting; -The staff tried multiple times to redirect, ambulate with the resident, offer snacks, etc.; -The staff provided one-on-one supervision. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 9/23/23 at 4:06 A.M., showed the following: -The resident's spouse summoned the staff to the resident's room because the resident fell; -One inch by half inch skin tear on inner right elbow; -The resident said he/she hit his/her head at the top of the head and rubbed his/her knee, but said the pain was not bad. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident had severely impaired cognition; -He/She wandered four to six days during the assessment, but less than daily; -He/She was independent with bed mobility, ambulation, and transfers; -He/She was frequently incontinent of bladder; -He/She had a wanderguard alarm (specifically designed for dementia patients allowing them to have freedom within their resident facilities while giving them essential security). Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 11/14/23 at 3:41 A.M., showed the following: -The resident walked down the hall and through the community room doors; -The staff found the resident walking through the outer door to outside of the community room; -The staff assisted the resident back into the facility and hourly monitoring was started. Review of the resident's physician orders, dated January 2024, showed the following: -Diet: Regular lactose intolerance; -Oxygen at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation of greater than 90%, may titrate to maintain, and begin titrating down as soon as possible (ASAP); -Check oxygen saturation every shift while symptoms persist every shift; -Metoprolol succinate extended release 24 hour (blood pressure reducer) 25 milligrams (mg), give half a tablet orally once a day; -Digestive enzymes 220 mg, give one tablet as needed with meals if the resident will have any dairy products. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 1/6/24 at 8:34 A.M., showed the following: -At 6:40 A.M., the resident fell when exiting his/her room, but the fall was unwitnessed; -Three centimeters (cm) by four cm abrasion noted to frontal scalp and several small skin tears noted to bilateral hands, area under the resident's left eye beginning to bruise, and complained of headache and right knee pain. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 1/12/24 at 1:01 P.M., showed the following: -Bruising to the resident's face was healing as well as skin tears and lacerations; -The CT scan (a computed tomography scan is a medical imaging technique used to obtain detailed internal images of the body) revealed non-displaced patellar fracture (broken knee cap); -The physician recommended orthopedic consult. Observation on 1/23/24 at 10:15 A.M., showed the resident had a large adhesive bandage across his/her forehead. During an interview on 1/23/24 at 10:15 A.M., the resident's spouse said the following: -The bandage covered a wound on the resident's head obtained during the last fall; -The resident was scheduled for an orthopedic appointment related to patellar (kneecap) fracture obtained from the last fall; -The resident did not listen to instructions related to dementia; -The resident was supposed to use a walker with ambulation, but did not always do it; -The last time the resident fell, he/she was ambulating and fell in the room ' s doorway; Observation on 1/23/24 at 11:10 A.M., showed two certified nurse aides (CNAs) used a gait belt and transferred the resident from recliner to wheelchair. During an interview on 1/24/24 at 6:37 A.M., CNA H said the following: -The resident did not wander anymore; -The resident had difficulty getting up without assistance; -The resident continued to try to get up without assistance, but it was more difficult. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 9:10 A.M., Certified Medication Technician (CMT) J said the following: -The resident was sick in December 2023 and could not stand due to weakness; -Prior to the illness, the resident was independent with ambulation, toileting, and eating; -The resident required staff assistance with eating and drinking; -The resident had decreased appetite; -The resident required oxygen and two person assist with transfers. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 9:22 A.M., the Care Plan Coordinator said when the resident became sick, he/she required assistance from two staff for transfers. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 9:30 A.M., CNA F said the following: -The resident was not eating well; -The resident had weakness requiring two staff members for transfers; -The resident could not walk. The resident's care plan did not include updated interventions for wandering behavior (including the wander guard), new falls, injuries related to falls, changes in ADL/ambulation related to illness, oxygen use, lactose intolerance, or antihypertensive medication indications with signs/symptoms of hypotension or hypertension (low blood pressure or high blood pressure. During an interview on 1/30/24 at 12:45 P.M., the Care Plan Coordinator said the following: -She and the Director of Nursing (DON) were responsible for adding interventions following an infection and new exit seeking behavior; -She started training for the Care Plan Coordinator position in October 2023. The DON was responsible for updating the care plans prior to October 2023; -She and the DON worked closely on updating the residents' care plans, however, not all the care plans were updated yet; -The care plan was supposed to be updated regarding the resident's change in condition; -The care plan was supposed to be updated regarding the resident's exit seeking behavior and interventions to address the behavior. 4. Review of Resident #3's care plan, updated 10/6/22, showed the following: -The resident was at risk for falling due to occasional unsteady gait; -The staff were to analyze the resident's falls to determine pattern/trend; -The staff were to assure the resident was wearing eyeglasses that were clean and in good repair; -The staff were to assure the floor was free of glare, liquids, and foreign objects; -The staff were to encourage the resident to assume a standing position slowly; -The staff were to give the resident verbal reminders not to transfer when feeling weak or unsteady without assistance; -The staff were to keep the resident's bed in the lowest position with the brakes locked; -The staff were to keep the resident's call light in reach at all times; -The staff were to keep the resident's personal items and frequently used items within reach; -The staff were to leave the nightlight on in the room; -The staff were to obtain physical therapy consult for strength training, toning, positioning, transfer training, gait training, mobility devices; -The staff were to provide the resident an environment free of cluster; -The staff were to ensure the resident had proper, well-maintained footwear. Review of the resident's face sheet, showed the following: -The resident was readmitted on [DATE]; -He/She had a durable power of attorney; -Diagnoses included dementia, low back pain, cognitive communication deficit, stage II chronic kidney disease, chronic pain, polyarthritis (arthritis in five or more joints at the same time), hyperparathyroidism (condition in which the parathyroid glands produce too much parathyroid hormone, affecting calcium levels in the blood), hypothyroidism, hearing loss, depressive episodes person experiences feeling sad, irritable, empty that last most of the day, nearly every day, for at least two weeks), rheumatoid arthritis (long-lasting autoimmune disease that mostly affects joints), lumbar region spinal stenosis (narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower part of the back), insomnia (common sleep disorder that can make it hard to fall asleep or stay asleep), respiratory syncytial virus, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, prurigo nodularis (chronic skin disorder characterized by the presence of hard, extremely itchy bumps known as nodules), essential hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and constipation. Review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident had moderately impaired cognition; -He/She experienced delusions; -He/She had wandering behavior that occurred four to six days, but less than daily; -He/She experienced a fall any time in the last two to six months prior to admission. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 5/12/23 at 3:41 P.M., showed the following: -The resident was insistent about leaving. He/She suddenly stood and leaned over Registered Nurse (RN) I, started to claw at RN I's neck, and yelled; -RN I alerted the administrator the resident was looking to leave; -The administrator met the resident at the door and tried to redirect the resident; -The resident started banging on the door and yelled. The CMT helped the administrator get the resident away from the door; -The resident tried to kick and hit staff and clawed the CMT; -The nurse called the on-call physician, who ordered Haldol (antipsychotic) 5 milligrams (mg)/milliliter (ml), give half a ml=2.5 mg intramuscularly now and may repeat dose in 30 minutes if needed; -Two staff members held the resident while the medication was administered; -The resident called staff names and tried to hit, kick, and bite; -The staff brought the resident to the nurses' station, and the administrator observed the resident and kept other residents out of his/her reach. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 5/28/23 at 7:40 P.M., showed the resident sat on the bench in the hallway, fell asleep, rolled off the bench, and landed on the floor. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation related to the resident's fall on 5/28/23. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 8/5/23 at 12:01 P.M., showed during lunch, the resident sat in his/her recliner. He/She attempted to stand up, but slid onto the floor. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation related to the resident's fall on 8/5/23. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 8/3/23 at 12:30 P.M., showed the following: -The resident went through the front door and the staff walked with the resident; -The nurse attempted to redirect the resident back to the door to come inside, but the resident reached up and hit the nurse in the face and yelled to leave him/her alone and do not touch; -The nurse backed off and walked with the resident a bit more and was able to get the resident to sit down in a chair outside; -A different staff member was able to direct the resident back inside. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 8/18/23 at 9:31 P.M., showed the following: -The resident asked staff questions about what to do, and was unhappy with any answer; -The resident did not stay with any activity provided such as a book, word search, or television; -The Activity Director gave the resident clothes to fold, and the resident sat and angrily folded the clothes; -The resident grabbed RN I's hand as he/she walked towards the resident's room, and yelled at RN I for holding his/her hand and dragging him/her down the hallway; -The resident tried to grab an empty supper tray from a kitchen helper's hand and yelled, let me eat it, I'm hungry; -RN I tried to distract the resident by following RN I for a snack, but the resident was not distracted and followed the kitchen helper into the break room and tried to grab the tray; -RN I told the resident the kitchen helper was going to wash the tray and the resident yelled, I know how to wash dishes, give it here; -RN I helped the kitchen aide escape the break room and the kitchen aide grabbed dirty napkins to put in the laundry room and the resident tried to rip the laundry basket out of his/her hands while continuing to yell; -The resident tried to hit RN I while RN I tried to distract the resident from the kitchen helper, and then the resident grabbed the kitchen helper by the shirt sleeve and the kitchen aide walked back to the nurses' station with RN I and the resident to convince the resident to let go; -RN I took sandwiches and snacks out of the refrigerator and the resident yelled that he/she did no want any of it and was not hungry; -The resident called RN I names from across the nurses' station, then grabbed CNA papers off the nurses' station, tried to read the papers, saw his/her name on the papers, and became angry; -The CNA tried to get the resident to give up the papers. The resident grabbed the CNA's thumb and tried to bend the thumb backwards; -The CMT was able to get the resident to release the CNA, but the resident tried to bite both staff members; -A different CNA was able to convince the resident to get dressed for bed in his/her room; -The resident threatened the CNA verbally, but cooperated with dressing and went to bed. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation regarding the resident's behavior or interventions from 8/18/23. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 11/9/23 at 5:30 P.M., showed the staff found the resident in a room across the hall from the resident's room, sitting on the floor. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 12/21/23 at 6:20 A.M., showed the resident yelled out and staff found him/her sitting on the floor in his/her room with his/her pants around his/her thighs. Review of the resident's nurse notes, dated 12/27/23 at 10:24 P.M., showed the following: -The resident walked to the front door and demanded to leave the building; -He/She hit and kicked staff, yelled loudly, and took over 25 minutes to convince the resident to go elsewhere. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 1/30/24 at 1:46 A.M., showed the staff often provided one-on-one oversight when the resident was confused because sometimes he/she tried to leave or entered other resident rooms. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation regarding the resident's falls on 11/9/23 or 12/21/23 and was not updated to show the resident's behaviors with interventions on 12/27/23 and 1/30/24. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident had severely impaired cognition; -He/She experienced delusion, physical behaviors, and verbal behaviors; -He/She rejected care that occurred one to three days during seven-day review; -He/She had wandering behavior that occurred four to six days, but less then daily; -He/She had two falls without injury since last assessment; -He/She had a wanderguard alarm. Observation on 1/23/24 at 10:50 A.M., showed the following: -The staff walked with the resident to the common area and instructed the resident to sit there for awhile; -The resident stood up from the chair and yelled, I have to poop, then walked up to the nurses' station and said the same thing; -The staff assisted the resident to the bathroom, gave the resident cues while toileting, assisted with peri care, then walked the resident back to the common area; -The resident stood up and started to walk towards his/her room, but the resident's family member asked the resident where he/she was going and to sit in the common area; -The resident started to walk towards his/her room. The family member said again for the resident to wait as there were three men in his/her room working on the recliner; -The resident continued to his/her room and watched the men work on the recliner; -The family member redirected the resident back to the common area to sit in a chair next to the family member; -The family member spoke with another visitor and was heard saying the facility staff called and told him/her to come in and sit with the resident while the recliner was being repaired; -The resident continued to get up and ambulate around the common area three times. During an interview on 1/23/24 at 11:25 A.M., the resident's family member said the following: -The staff requested the family member come to the facility while the resident's recliner was being repaired; -The staff knew the resident would have behaviors when he/she went back to the his/her room and found strange men present, working on the recliner chair; -He/She thought the resident would be willing to sit in the common area if he/she sat in the common area with the resident. Observation on 1/23/24 at 11:44 A.M., showed the following: -The resident stood up from the dining room table before lunch was served and headed towards the doorway out into the hallway; -The family member asked the resident if he/she would like to eat something first and the resident yelled, no; -The family member told the resident they would do whatever he/she wanted. Both the family member and the resident left the dining room. Observation on 1/23/24 at 11:54 A.M., showed two staff walked with the resident back into the dining room. During an interview on 1/24/24 at 6:37 A.M., CNA H said the following: -The resident slept in different areas. Some nights the resident slept on the couch, sometimes in bed, and some nights the resident had difficulty sleeping; -The resident wandered in the hallways, but usually because he/she needed to use the restroom or needed assistance with incontinence care; -The resident urinated in a trash can in his/her room a few times, because the resident did not find the restroom. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 1:08 P.M., the acting Director of Nursing said the following; -The resident wandered in the facility, but was usually easily redirected; -The resident did have negative behaviors but the behaviors were directed towards staff. Observation on 1/25/24 at 8:02 A.M., showed the resident was asleep on the couch in the common room, covered with a blanket and a decorative pillow under his/her head. During an interview on 1/30/24 at 12:45 P.M., the Care Plan Coordinator said the following: -The Director of Nursing (DON) was supposed to update the care plan when a resident returned to the facility from a behavioral health unit and determined what interventions were required; -The DON and Care Plan Coordinator work closely on updating the resident's care plan, however not all the care plans have been updated yet; -The resident's preference to sleep on a couch in the common area should have been added to the care plan; -It would be beneficial for nursing intervention for the resident's negative behaviors be added to the care plan; -The care plan should have nursing interventions for the resident's wandering and exit seeking behaviors. The resident's care plan, last updated 11/7/23, did not include updated interventions related to new falls, staff interventions for behaviors towards others, and staff interventions for wandering behavior. 5. Review of Resident #4's care plan, last updated 10/4/22, showed the following: -Analyze the resident's falls to determine pattern/trend; -Provide the resident with education on importance of using call light and waiting for assistance; -The physician ordered non-skid, hard soled shoes when up; -Provide frequent and consistent reminders for the resident not to transfer or ambulate without assistance; -Provide assistive device (wheeled walker) for use while ambulating; -Use a night light after dark; -Ensure a clutter free pathway; -Place frequently used and personal items within reach; -Provide and offer toileting assistance on routine and as needed rounds; -Encourage the resident to assume standing position slowly; -Keep the call light in reach and keep the bed in the lowest position with the brakes locked; -Make sure the resident's eyeglasses are clean and in good repair; -Encourage the resident to use grab bars, handrails, etc.; -The resident used the wheelchair more often and was able to self-propel through hallways most of the time; -The resident was impulsive and needed assistance; -The resident used a chair alarm for safety. Review of the resident's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident had a severe cognitive impairment; -He/She had fluctuating inattention and disorganized thinking; -He/She had wandering behavior that occurred four to six days, but less than daily; -He/She had one fall without injury since the prior assessment; -He/She had a weight of 107 pounds. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 2/3/23 at 8:15 P.M., showed the following: -The resident sat on the floor by his/her bed with blood running from the back of his/her head, over the top of his/her head, and dripped off his/her face; -The nurse found a lump on the back of crown area on the resident's head with an abrasion and laceration approximately one to two inches. Review of the resident's care plan, showed no documentation regarding the resident's fall on 2/3/23. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 3/5/23 at 1:38 A.M., showed staff heard the resident yell and found him/her sitting on the floor in front of the bathroom where the resident apparently slipped on loose stools. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 3/9/23 at 6:11 A.M., showed the resident stood up from a chair in the common area with his/her wheeled walker in front of him/her, took one step and fell backwards hitting the back of his/her head. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 3/20/23 at 3:35 P.M., showed the following: -The staff found the resident on the floor of his/her room leaning against the bed; -The resident had his/her shoes on and seemed to be walking towards the walker when the resident fell. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation regarding the resident's fall on 3/20/23. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 5/5/23, at 3:15 P.M., showed the resident stood in the hallway by the nurses' station without a walker, fell backwards, and hit his/her back and the back of his/her head on the corner of the wall. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation regarding the resident's fall on 5/5/23. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 7/20/23 at 8:50 A.M., showed the resident fell on his/her right side in the hallway; Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 7/20/23 at 4:51 P.M., showed the resident was admitted to the hospital for pain control and p
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow the facility policy to identify fall risk...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow the facility policy to identify fall risks, develop interventions to prevent falls, investigate falls for possible causes and/or contributing factors and consistently evaluate, implement, and modify interventions/develop corrective measures to prevent further falls for three residents (Resident #3, #282, and #400) in a sample of eight residents. The facility census was 33. Review of the facility policy, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, revised 2018, showed the following: -Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling; -According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment completed by staff, a fall is defined as: Unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor or other lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force (e.g., a resident pushes another resident). An episode where a resident lost his/her balance and would have fallen, if not for another person or if he or she had not caught him/herself, is considered a fall. A fall without injury is still a fall. Unless there is evidence suggesting otherwise, when a resident is found on the floor, a fall is considered to have occurred; -Fall Risk Factors: -If the cause of a fall is unclear, or if a fall may have a significant medical cause such as a stroke or an adverse drug reaction (ADR), or if the individual continues to fall despite attempted interventions, a physician will review the situation and help further identify causes and contributing factors; -Many categories of medications, and especially combinations of medications in several of those categories, increase the risk of falling; -Environmental factors that contribute to the risk of falls include: wet floors; poor lighting; incorrect bed height or width; obstacles in the footpath; improperly fitted or maintained wheelchairs; and footwear that is unsafe or absent; -Resident conditions that may contribute to the risk of falls include: fever; infection; delirium and other cognitive impairment; pain; lower extremity weakness; poor grip strength; medication side effects; orthostatic hypotension (blood pressure drops with position changes); functional impairments; visual deficits; and incontinence; -Medical factors that contribute to the risk of falls include: arthritis; heart failure; anemia; neurological disorders; and balance and gait disorders; etc; -The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls; -If a systematic evaluation of a resident's fall risk identifies several possible interventions, the staff may choose to prioritize interventions (i.e., to try one or a few at a time, rather than many at once); -If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions, or indicate why the current approach remains relevant; -If underlying causes cannot be readily identified or corrected, staff will try various interventions, based on assessment of the nature or category of falling, until falling is reduced or stopped, or until the reason for the continuation of the falling is identified as unavoidable; -If the resident continues to fall, staff will re-evaluate the situation and whether it is appropriate to continue or change current interventions. As needed, the attending physician will help the staff reconsider possible causes that may not previously have been identified. Review of the facility policy, Falls and Fall Risk, revised March 2018, showed the following: -For an individual who has fallen, the staff and practitioner will begin to try to identify possible causes within 24 hours of the fall; -If the cause of a fall is unclear, or if a fall may have a significant medical cause such as a stroke or an adverse drug reaction (ADR), or if the individual continues to fall despite attempted interventions, a physician will review the situation and help further identify causes and contributing factors; -Many categories of medications, and especially combinations of medications in several of those categories, increase the risk of falling; -If underlying causes cannot be readily identified or corrected, staff will try various relevant interventions, based on assessment of the nature or category of falling, until falling reduces or stops or until a reason is identified for its continuation; -The staff, with the physician's guidance, will follow up on any fall with associated injury until the resident is stable and delayed complications such as late fracture or subdural hematoma have been ruled out or resolved; -The staff and physician will monitor and document the individual's response to interventions intended to reduce falling or the consequences of falling; -Frail elderly individuals are often at greater risk for serious adverse consequences of falls; -Risks of serious adverse consequences can sometimes be minimized even if falls cannot be prevented; -If interventions have been successful in fall prevention, the staff will continue with current approaches and will discuss periodically with the physician whether these measures are still needed; for example, if the problem that required the intervention has resolved by addressing the underlying cause; -If the individual continues to fall, the staff and physician will re-evaluate the situation and reconsider possible reasons for the resident's falling (instead of, or in addition to those that have already been identified) and also reconsider the current interventions. 1. Review of Resident #3's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident had moderately impaired cognition; -He/She experienced delusions; -He/She had wandering behavior that occurred four to six days of the seven day review, but less than daily; -He/She had experienced a fall in the last two to six months prior to admission; -The resident's last day of physical therapy was 3/15/23. Review of Resident #3's Care Plan, updated 10/6/22, showed the following: -Diagnoses included dementia, psychotic disturbance (when you perceive or interpret reality in a very different way from people around you), mood disturbance, anxiety, cognitive communication deficit, abnormalities of gait and mobility, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, unsteadiness on feet; -The resident was at risk for falling due to occasional unsteady gait; -Analyze the resident's falls to determine pattern/trend; -Assure the resident was wearing eyeglasses that were clean and in good repair; -Assure the floor is free of glare, liquids, and foreign objects; -Encourage the resident to assume a standing position slowly; -Give the resident verbal reminders not to transfer when feeling weak or unsteady without assistance; -Keep the resident's bed in the lowest position with the brakes locked; -Place the resident's call light in reach at all times; -Keep personal items and frequently used items within reach; -Nightlight on in the room at night; -Physical therapy consult for strength training, toning, positioning, transfer training, gait training and mobility devices; -Keep environment free of clutter; -Ensure the resident had proper, well-maintained footwear; -Nothing about the resident being an elopement risk. There were two readmissions on 2/14/23 and 3/28/23, however the date on the care plan date remained 10/6/22. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 5/12/23 at 3:41 P.M., showed the following: -The resident was insistent about leaving; -The Certified Medication Technician (CMT) helped the administrator get the resident away from the door; -The staff brought the resident to the nurses' station, the administrator observed the resident and kept other residents out of his/her reach. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 5/28/23 at 7:40 P.M., showed the resident sat on the bench in the hallway, fell asleep, rolled off the bench, and landed on the floor. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation related to the resident's fall on 5/28/23 and no new interventions put in place to address falls. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 8/3/23 at 12:30 P.M., showed the following: -The resident went through the front door and the staff walked with the resident; -A different staff member was able to direct the resident back inside. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 8/5/23 at 12:01 P.M., showed during lunch, the resident sat in his/her recliner. He/She attempted to stand up but slid onto the floor. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation related to the resident's fall on 8/5/23, no new interventions were put in place and no update to show the resident was an elopement risk. Review showed no documentation in the resident's medical record to show the resident had a therapy evaluation as the resident's care plan directed or a medication review, per facility policy, after a resident has falls. Review of the resident's physician orders, dated October 2023, showed the following: -Duloxetine (antidepressant medications) delayed release 20 milligrams (mg), give one tablet once a day for depressive episodes (original order dated on 7/14/22); -Trazodone (antidepressant medication) 50 mg, give one tablet at bedtime for insomnia (original order dated 7/14/22); -Risperidone (antipsychotic medication) 0.5 mg three times daily and 0.25 mg one time daily for dementia (dose increase 6/30/23). Review of the resident's care plan for falls, last reviewed/revised 11/6/23, show no new interventions or changed interventions related to falls, or elopement attempts. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 11/9/23 at 5:30 P.M., showed staff found the resident in a room across the hall from the resident's room, sitting on the floor. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 12/21/23 at 6:20 A.M., showed the resident yelled out and staff found him/her sitting on the floor in his/her room with his/her pants around his/her thighs. Review of the resident's nursing notes, dated 12/27/23 at 10:24 P.M., showed the following: -The resident walked to the front door and demanded to leave the building; -He/She hit and kicked staff, yelled loudly, and took over 25 minutes to convince the resident to go elsewhere. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 1/30/24 at 1:46 A.M., showed staff often provided one-on-one oversight when the resident was confused because sometimes, he/she tried to leave or entered other resident rooms. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation regarding the resident's falls on 11/9/23 or 12/21/23, no new interventions were put in place and no update to show the resident was an elopement risk. Review showed no documentation in the resident's medical record to show the resident had a therapy evaluation as the residents care plan directed or a medication review, per facility policy, after a resident has falls. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -The resident had severely impaired cognition; -He/She experienced delusion, physical behaviors, and verbal behaviors; -He/She rejected care that occurred one to three days of the seven-day review; -He/She had wandering behavior that occurred four to six days of the seven-day review, but less then daily; -He/She had two falls without injury since last assessment; -He/She had a wanderguard (bracelet the resident wears that triggers the doors to lock and alarm) when the resident nears it. Review of the resident's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 2/9/24, showed the following: -Resident wanders; -Has had 1-2 falls in the last three months; -Ambulatory and incontinent; -Balance problem while standing/walking; -Change in gait pattern while walking i.e.shuffling; -Currently takes 3-4 medications that increase the resident's risk of falling; -Resident has three or more disease processes present that increase the risk of falling. -The resident scored 20 and was a high risk for falls (score over 10 is high risk for falls). Review of the resident's elopement risk assessment, dated 2/13/24, showed the resident was at risk for elopement and a wanderguard censor (censor that sounds an alarm and doors to lock worn by residents) was placed. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/13/24 at 2:06 P.M., showed the following: -Resident has been up and very active this shift; -Multiple attempts to go out front door, convinced the resident he/she drove here and he/she can leave when he/she wants to; -Difficult to redirect, needing extra supervision. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/13/24 at 10:55 P.M., showed the following: -Resident has continued to be restless all shift; -Several more attempts to leave the facility and opened doors. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/14/24 at 10:25 P.M., showed the following: -Resident very confused & uncooperative at times with care; -Roams in hallway frequently; -Has wanderguard and exit seeks at times. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/16/24, at 3:57 P.M., showed on 2/15/24 the resident was restless and attempted to exit front door several times. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/18/24, time at 6:40 P.M., showed staff notified the resident's responsible party regarding an incident between the resident and another resident this morning. Another resident grabbed Resident #3's wrist this morning. Review of the resident's care plan showed no update regarding resident safety with resident to resident interactions. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/20/24,at 6:18 P.M., showed the following: -Resident started exit seeking after supper; -He/She escalated as staff did not let him/her exit; -The resident repeatedly said he/she was walking to his/her house; -He/She was violent with staff, kicking, biting, punching and yelling obscenities at them/us all; -He/She pushed his/her way through the first exit door dragging two staff with him/her; -Staff got the resident back inside and over to the couch. Review of the resident's care plan showed no direction for staff when the resident exit seeking and attempting to leave. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 2/20/24, at 6:39 P.M., showed the following: -Physician was in building during episode of an elope attempt and aggression; -The physician wanted the resident to get his/her Trazodone early; -He/She refused to take the medication; -He/She got up again and tried to exit, kicking the door and trying to claw the skin on the staff member's hands as another staff member was holding the door shut; -Physician gave orders to give Haldol (antipsychotic) 5 mg/ml 2.5 mg (intramuscularly) IM now; -Resident has been trying to exit back door, staff held the door shut from the outside, so he/she diverted to the dining room and sat; -Staff held the resident's arms and administered Haldol IM in the resident's right buttock; -Resident then sat in the dining room with his/her head down on table and muttering about the staff. Review of the resident's care plan, last updated 11/7/23, did not include updated interventions related to new falls, wandering behavior, or elopement attempts from 2/1/24 to 2/28/24. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 2/29/24, showed the following: -The resident's cognitive dementia care plan was updated to include the following: -Resident is unable to make daily decisions without cues/supervision; -Resident wanders throughout the facility, normally does not go into unsafe areas but can be found in other residents' rooms; -Resident will remain free from injury by not entering unsafe areas on a daily basis; -Resident will wear a wandergaurd on his/her wrist; -Wandergaurd will be checked for placement and if not in place, let the nurse know; -Redirect resident if going into an unsafe area or other residents rooms; -Take resident by the hand and direct him/her into a safe place such as common area or his/her room; -The care plan update did not include updated interventions related to falls. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 3/7/24, at 6:00 P.M., showed the following: -After supper resident was arguing, yelling, and being rude with another resident at the nurses station; -Redirected him/her away from the other resident and he/she went to the front door insisting he/she was going to leave. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 3/9/24, at 7:00 P.M., showed he/she ate supper in the dining room and immediately walked out and straight to the front door trying to exit the facility. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 3/11/24, at 5:06 P.M., showed the following: -During the day shift today, resident was exit seeking, talking about how he/she needed to get home to check on her little kids at home; -Staff explained that someone was watching her kids and they were okay, no need to worry. Review of the resident's nursing notes, dated 3/11/24 at 8:23 P.M., showed the following: -Resident escaped through the community room, alarm went off and a certified nurse aide went to find him/her; -Resident was found sitting on his/her buttocks in the ditch outside the facility. Review of the resident's care plan showed no updates or revisions with the elopement attempt on 3/7/24, 3/9/24 and 3/11/24, or the fall on 3/11/24. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff investigated the fall to attempt to determine the cause, or add or review any interventions to prevent future falls within 24 hours as directed in the facility's policy. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 3/12/24, at 11:22 A.M., showed the Director of Nursing (DON) documented the following: -Resident's responsible party contacted regarding the two times the resident has gotten out of the building in the last couple weeks; -Explained to responsible party that the pharmacy was doing a medication review and that the physician would be reviewing any recommendations; -Recommended that she would like to see resident on scheduled medication that would be effective and something as needed (PRN) for when staff are just not able to get the resident to calm down; -Resident's responsible party said he/she did not want the resident to be drugged; -She told the responsible party that was not the goal, and staff would be watching for changes in sleep patterns etc. if med changes were to happen, but for the resident's safety, the facility needed to do something; -The resident's responsible party voiced concerns over the resident being bored; -They discussed activities to assist with the resident being bored. 2. Review of Resident #400's face sheet showed the resident admitted to the facility 2/13/24. Review of the resident's baseline care plan, dated 2/14/24, showed the following: -Activities of daily living assistance needed from staff with hygiene, transfer, toileting, mobility and that the resident prefers to sleep in a recliner; -Incontinence care needs; -Dementia needs; -Communication preferences; -Impaired hearing needs; -Pain management issues; -Safety concerns regarding fall risk; -Visual impairment. Review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Diagnosis include dementia, high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus (inability to control blood sugar), arthritis, anxiety, depression, chronic respiratory disease, visual impairment related to macular degeneration, manic episode with severe psychotic symptoms, seizures, cellulitis (infection of the tissue) left lower limb; -Minimal difficulty with hearing and does not have a hearing device; -Usually understands but misses some part of message; -Vision highly impaired and does not have corrective lenses; -Functional limitations in range of motion to both upper and both lower extremities; -Requires partial/moderate assistance from staff with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, shower/bath, upper body dressing, personal hygiene, to go from sitting to standing and with transfers; -Requires substantial/maximal assistance from staff with lower body dressing; -Dependent on staff for putting on or taking off footwear; -Unable to ambulate; -Independent with wheelchair; -Occasionally incontinent of urine; -On scheduled and as needed pain medication, occasionally has pain he/she rates a 6 on a 1-10 scale; -No history of falls; -Pain or difficulty with swallowing; -Receives opioid pain medications and medications to lower blood sugar. Review of the resident's nursing notes, dated 3/9/24 at 3:15 A.M., showed the following: -Resident called for help, he/she fell; -Staff found the resident on his/her buttocks on the floor with his/her back against the wheelchair; -The resident had toileted himself/herself and fell transferring back to his/her wheelchair from the toilet. Review showed no evidence staff investigated the fall to attempt to determine the root cause, and did not add or review any interventions to prevent future falls within 24 hours as directed in the facility's policy. Review of the resident's nursing notes, dated 3/12/24, at 3:37 A.M., showed the following: -Staff heard resident down the hall; -Resident found on the floor in front of his/her recliner with the footrest raised; -The resident said he/she way trying to get in his/her wheelchair. Review showed no evidence staff investigated the fall to attempt to determine the root cause, and did not add or review any interventions to prevent future falls within 24 hours as directed in the facility's policy. Review showed no comprehensive care plan with measurable objective goals, and the resident's baseline care plan did not include updates after the resident's falls on 3/9/24 and 3/12/24. The resident did not have a complete comprehensive care plan with measurable goals related to falls. 3. Review of Resident #282's care plan, dated 12/14/22, showed the following: -Resident has history of falling related to lack of safety awareness, impulsiveness, and Parkinson's Disease (a brain condition that causes problems with movement, mental health, sleep, pain and other health issues); -Analyze resident's falls to determine pattern/trend; -Ensure resident is wearing eyeglasses. Assure eyeglasses are clean and in good repair; -Assure the floor is free of glare, liquids, foreign objects; -Encourage resident to assume a standing position slowly; -Encourage resident to use environmental devices such as hand grips, hand rails, etc.; -Give resident verbal reminders not to ambulate/transfer without assistance; -Keep call light in reach at all times; -Keep personal items and frequently used items within reach; -Leave night light on in room; -Occupy resident with meaningful distractions; -Place resident in a fall prevention program; -Provide resident an environment free of clutter; -Provide resident with safety device/appliance: wheeled walker; -Provide proper, well-maintained footwear; -Provide toileting assistance as requested; -Teach resident safety measures. Review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Inattention and disorganized thinking fluctuates; -Delusions (beliefs that are contrary to reality); -No behaviors; -Occasionally incontinent of bladder, continent of bowel; -One no injury fall since previous assessment. The resident's care plan was last reviewed/revised on 11/7/23 with no changes to the plan. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Added walker and wheelchair use; -No behaviors; -Requires partial/moderate assistance from staff for ambulation, toileting, and transfers; -Frequently incontinent of bladder, occasionally incontinent of bowel; -Two or more no injury falls since previous assessment; -Takes antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. Review of the resident's nurses note, dated 2/10/24 at 4:01 P.M., showed the following: -Staff reported the resident was crawling on floor in room last evening; -The resident said he/she got down there to call for help to toilet because no one would answer his/her call light for an hour; -Staff here last night are here tonight and said the resident did not have his/her call light on. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff investigated the fall to attempt to determine the root cause, did not add or review any interventions to prevent future falls within 24 hours as directed in the facility's policy and there were no updates or revisions to the resident's plan of care. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/16/24 at 12:46 A.M., showed the following: -Resident was found on the floor, unwitnessed fall; -Resident said he/she slid out of his bed onto the floor; -Resident said he/she did not hit his/her head and he/she was not injured that he/she was aware of at this time; -Resident said he/she will probably hurt tomorrow due to the fall; -Resident was placed back in bed with pin alarm on (alarm to alert staff of resident movement), bed in low position and non skid socks placed on his/her feet. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff investigated the fall to attempt to determine the root cause, did not add or review any interventions to prevent future falls within 24 hours as directed in the facility's policy and there were no updates or revisions to the resident's plan of care. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Rejection of care one to three days in the last seven days; -Continued walker and wheelchair use; -Frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel; -Occasional moderate pain, that affects sleep and day to day activities; -One no injury fall since previous assessment. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 2/25/24 at 4:30 A.M., showed the following: -Found resident sitting on the floor on a bed pad in front of his/her recliner; -He/She said he/she slid out of his/her recliner but did not hit his/her head. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff investigated the fall to attempt to determine the root cause, did not add or review any interventions to prevent future falls within 24 hours as directed in the facility's policy and there were no updates or revisions to the resident's plan of care. Review of the resident's nursing note, dated 3/12/24 at 9:22 P.M., showed the following: -Resident was yelling out asking for help, resident was on the floor in front of toilet; -Resident was transferring him/herself onto the toilet and apparently had transferred to the toilet unassisted; -Resident said he/she didn't hit his/her head but hit his/her left side on the toilet. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff investigated the fall to attempt to determine the root cause, did not add or review any interventions to prevent future falls within 24 hours as directed in the facility's policy and there were no updates or revisions to the resident's plan of care. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 1:00 P.M., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) E said some of the residents have a bell above their bed if they are a fall risk, but did not know if all of the residents at risk for falls have one. Fall risk would be on the resident's care plan and the interventions staff are expected to follow would be found there. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 1:15 P.M., Registered Nurse (RN) A said if a resident falls, staff are expected to notify the charge nurse prior to moving the resident. The charge nurse assesses the resident for injury. If injury is suspected, notify physician depending on type of injury before or after moving the resident. The physician and responsible party are notified of the fall. Staff are to start an event report on the fall. Assessments are done for 48-72 hours to watch for injuries from the fall and are charted in the nurses notes and neurological check form (if applies). He/She was not sure who evaluated the fall to determine a root cause. The care plan coordinator or Director of Nursing (DON) would update the care plan if there were any changes. During an interview on 3/13/24 at 2:30 P.M., the DON said the following: -She was new to the facility; -The facility did not have a full time DON for two years prior to her; -After a fall, a post fall assessment is expected to be completed to determine the cause of a fall; -Care plans are expected to be reviewed and revised after falls or elopement/exit seeking behaviors, to attempt to prevent future occurrences; -Some systems are not currently in place, -The facility has reached out to Quality Improvement Program for Missouri (QIPMO) for assistance in getting the resident's care plans and systems in place to assist with systems like the fall program.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic medications for one ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic medications for one resident (Resident #20), in a review of 13 sampled residents, were limited to 14 days as required, except if an attending or prescribing physician believed that it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days. The facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic medications or document a clinical justification to continue current dosage for two residents (Residents #3 and #5), in a review of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, dated July 2022, showed the following: -Residents on psychotropic medications receive gradual dose reductions (coupled with non-pharmacological interventions), unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these medications; -Psychotropic medications are not prescribed as PRN basis unless that medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record; a.PRN orders for psychotropic medications are limited to 14 days; -For psychotropic medications that are NOT antipsychotics: If the prescriber or attending physician believes it is appropriate to extend the PRN order beyond 14 days, he or she will document the rationale for extending the use and include the duration for the PRN order; -For psychotropic medications that ARE antipsychotics: PRN orders cannot be renewed unless the attending physician or prescriber evaluates the resident and documents the appropriateness of the medication. 1. Review of Resident #3's physician orders, dated October 2024, showed the following: -Duloxetine delayed release (an antidepressant medication) 20 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth once a day for depressive episodes (original order dated on 3/28/23); -Trazadone (antidepressant) 50 mg, give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for insomnia (original order dated 3/28/23). Review of the resident's pharmacy consultation report, dated 10/29/23, showed no GDR was recommended by the pharmacy consultant, declined or documentation provided to continue duloxetine and Trazadone dosages by the physician. Review of the resident's physician's progress notes from March 2023 through January 2024 showed no documentation a GDR was attempted on the duloxetine or Trazadone and not clinical rationale for not conducting a GDR. Review of the resident's care plan, updated 11/7/23, showed the following: -The resident had disturbed sleep pattern related to insomnia; -He/She received an order for Trazadone at bedtime, which proved helpful with sleep; -He/She received an antidepressant medication, duloxetine 20 mg daily; -The pharmacy consultant reviewed as a regularly scheduled task. Review of the resident's physician orders, dated January 2024, showed the following: -Duloxetine delayed release 20 mg, give one tablet by mouth once a day for depressive episodes (original order dated on 3/28/23); -Trazadone 50 mg, give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for insomnia (original order dated 3/28/23). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/5/24, showed the following: -The resident had severe cognitive impairment; -He/She did not have symptoms of depression; -Diagnoses of dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) and depression (common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how a person feels, the way he/she thinks and how he/she acts); -He/She received antidepressants. 2. Review of Resident #5's care plan, dated 3/28/23, showed the following: -Psychotropic Drug Use: The resident will be prescribed the lowest dose of medication; -Assess the resident's functional status prior to initiation of drug use to serve as a baseline; -Monitor for effectiveness of medication; -Increase/decrease dosage gradually if needed; -Monitor the resident's functional status routinely and PRN (as needed); -Monitor the resident's mood and response. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated March 2023, showed the following: -Trazadone 50 mg (1/4 tablet), by mouth daily from 6:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. (original order dated 1/26/22); -Zoloft (an antidepressant medication) 25 mg, one tablet by mouth daily (original order dated 2/15/22). Review of the resident's pharmacist consult sheet, dated 4/27/23, showed the following: -Antidepressants used: Trazadone 12.5 mg at bedtime (HS) (original order dated 1/26/22) and Zoloft 25 mg daily (original order dated 2/15/22); -Recommendation timeline: last GDR evaluation over one year. Zoloft 25 mg daily, Trazadone 12.5 mg at bedtime. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation a GDR was attempted and no documentation of the physician's clinical rationale for not conducting a GDR of the resident's Trazadone and Zoloft. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -No mood problems, delirium, or behaviors; -Hypnotic and anti-depressants used last seven days of the look-back period. Review of the resident's POS, dated January 2024, showed the following: -Trazadone 50 mg (1/4 tablet) by mouth daily from 6:00 P.M. to 10:00 P.M. (original order dated 1/26/22); -Zoloft 25 mg one tablet by mouth daily (original order dated 2/15/22). Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence the pharmacy consultant recommended a GDR of the current dose of Trazadone and Zoloft between May 2023 and January 2024. 3. Review of Resident #20's care plan, dated 3/28/23, showed the following: -Psychotropic drug use: The resident will be prescribed the lowest effective dose; -Assess if behavioral/mood symptoms present a danger to the resident or others; -Monitor for drug effectiveness. Current order for as needed (PRN) Latvian (an antianxiety medication) has been effective; -Monitor functional status routinely and PRN; -Monitor mood and response to medication. Review of the resident's POS, dated 11/28/23, showed an order for Ativan 0.5 mg every eight hours PRN. Review of the resident's POS, dated December 2023, showed an order for Ativan 0.5 mg every eight hours PRN (original order dated 11/28/23). Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Memory problem; -Received anti-anxiety last seven days of look-back period. Review of the resident's POS, dated January 2024, showed the following: -Diagnoses included anxiety; -Ativan 0.5 mg by mouth every eight hours PRN (original order dated 11/28/23). Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation the resident's physician limited the use of the antianxiety medication to 14 days, and no documented rationale from the resident's physician to show use of the medication beyond 14 days was appropriate and the duration for the PRN order. 4. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 4:20 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the following: -The pharmacist consultant visited monthly; -The pharmacist recommendations for all residents are documented; -He/She goes through and separates the GDR requests and they are shared with the physician on Thursdays during the care conference; -If a GDR is refused by the physician, there should be a rationale.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete tuberculin (TB) skin testing as required of three resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete tuberculin (TB) skin testing as required of three residents (Residents #6, #13 and #14) at admission, and failed to complete an annual tuberculin screening to rule out signs, symptoms and exposure to TB for one resident (Resident #3), in a review of 13 sampled residents. The facility also failed to ensure a urinary catheter drainage system was maintained to prevent contamination for three residents (Residents #6, #11, and #21). The census was 30. Review of the facility policy Infection Control dated 10/2018, showed the infection control policies and practices are intended to facilitate maintaining a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent and manage transmission of diseases and infections. The objectives of the infection control policies and practices are to: -Prevent, detect, investigate and control infections in the facility; -Maintain a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment fro personnel, residents, visitors and the general public. Review of the facility's policy, Tuberculosis, Screening Residents, dated August 2019, showed the following: -This facility shall screen all residents for tuberculosis (TB) infection and disease; -The admitting nurse will screen referrals for admission and readmission for information regarding exposure to or symptoms of TB; -Screening of new admissions or readmissions for tuberculosis infection and disease is in compliance with state regulations; -The facility will conduct an annual risk assessment to determine risk of exposure. Review of the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services TB Screening for Long Term Care Residents, updated 3/11/14, showed the following: -If the resident was admitted to the facility without documentation of a prior two step Mantoux tuberculin skin test (TST), administer TST first step within one month prior to or one week after admission; -Read results of the first step TST within 48-72 hours of administration. (Results must be read and documented in millimeters (mm); -If negative results, then administer TST second step within one to three weeks; -Read results within 48 to 72 hours of administration; -If negative results, then annual evaluation to rule out signs/symptoms of TB. 1. Review of Resident #6's face sheet showed the resident admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's preventative health tuberculin testing showed the following: -The nurse administered the first step TST on 5/3/23; -No results were documented in the electronic medical record. Review of the resident's EMR showed no documentation the resident received a two step TST. 2. Review of Resident #13's face sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's preventative health tuberculin testing, dated 7/17/23, showed the following: -The nurse administered the TST on 7/17/23; -No results were documented in the electronic medical record. Review of the resident's EMR showed no documentation the resident received a two step TST. 3. Review of Resident #3's face sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's preventive health tuberculin testing, dated 2/14/22, showed the resident had an annual risk assessment to determine risk of exposure (on 2/14/22). Review of the resident's EMR showed no documentation the facility completed an annual risk assessment for TB after 2/14/22. 4. Review of Resident #14's face sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's preventative health tuberculin testing, dated 1/5/24, showed the following: -The nurse administered the first step TST on 1/5/24; -No results were documented in the electronic medical record. Review of the resident's EMR showed no documentation the resident received a two step TST. 5. Review of Resident #21's care plan, dated 5/31/23, showed the following: -Suprapubic catheter (a tube placed through the abdomen into the bladder to drain urine) related to neurogenic bladder (nerve damage causing loss of bladder control); -Catheter care managed appropriately; -Do not allow tubing or any part of the drainage system to touch the floor. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/10/23, showed the following: -Severely impaired cognition; -Presence of urinary catheter. Review of the resident's physician order sheet, dated January 2024, showed the following: -The resident's diagnoses included neurogenic bladder and urine retention; -18 French/10 cubic centimeter balloon (urinary catheter) monthly. Observation on 1/23/24 at 11:30 A.M. showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in the dining room. The urinary catheter drainage bag (located in a dignity bag) hung from under the resident's wheelchair and touched the floor. Observations on 1/24/24 showed the following: -At 7:00 A.M., the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in the dining room. The urinary catheter drainage bag (in a dignity bag) hung from under the wheelchair and touched the floor; -At 7:55 A.M., the resident propelled himself/herself down the hallway in his/her wheelchair. The urinary catheter drainage bag (in a dignity bag) hung from under the wheelchair and touched the floor. 6. Review of Resident #6's care plan, dated 11/20/23, showed no documentation the resident had a urinary catheter. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -He/She had moderately impaired cognition; -No documentation the resident had a urinary catheter. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 1/22/24 at 10:31 P.M., showed the resident returned from the hospital with the urinary catheter and the resident had a history of urinary retention. Review of the resident's physician orders, dated January 2024, showed to empty the urinary catheter and record results shiftly, three times a day (started on 1/22/24). Observation on 1/23/24 at 11:39 A.M., showed the resident propelled himself/herself in a wheelchair into the dining room. The urinary catheter tubing dragged on the ground under his/her wheelchair. Observations on 1/23/24 at 3:45 P.M. and at 5:10 P.M., showed the resident sat in a recliner in his/her room. The urinary catheter tubing touched the ground. 7. Review of Resident #11's admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -He/She was cognitively intact; -He/She required maximal assistance for toileting hygiene; -He/She had a urinary catheter; -Diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (person lacks bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve condition) and urinary tract infection. Review of the resident's physician orders, dated December 2023, showed Levaquin (an antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg), give one tablet by mouth once daily for personal history of UTIs (urinary tract infections) (started 11/28/23-12/4/23, then another order for 12/4/23-12/5/23). Review of the resident's physician orders, dated January 2024, showed the following: -18 French (catheter size) catheter placement and change every month. May change as needed for obstruction as needed (PRN) for hydronephrosis (swelling of one kidney due to a backup of urine) (started on 10/7/21); -Flush catheter twice a day and PRN with 60 milliliters (ml) of normal saline (fluid and electrolyte replenisher used as a source of water and electrolytes) for retention of urine (started on 11/8/21); -Empty and record urine from drain bag three times a day for retention of urine (started on 2/4/22); -Methenamine mandelate (antibiotic) 1 gram, give one tablet by mouth twice daily for person history of UTIs (original order dated 6/15/21); -Myrbetriq (urinary antispasmotic) 50 mg, give one tablet by mouth once daily for UTIs (original order dated 2/1/23); -Oxybutynin (urinary antispasmotic) 2.5 mg, give one tablet by mouth daily for retention of urine (started on 1/31/23). Observation on 1/23/24 at 3:40 P.M., showed the resident sat up in recliner in his/her room. The urinary catheter tubing touched the floor. Observation on 1/24/24 at 2:52 P.M., showed the resident sat in a wheelchair in his/her room. The urinary catheter tubing touched the floor. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 2:28 P.M., Certified Nurse Assistant K said no part of a urinary drainage system should touch the floor (including the dignity bag) to prevent infection. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 4:20 P.M., the Director of Nursing said the following: -If a TB test was not read within the allotted time frame, the testing would have to be repeated (started over); -No part of a urinary drainage system should touch the floor due to potential contamination.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food and beverages in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff failed to ensur...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food and beverages in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Staff failed to ensure foods were stored per the manufacturer's instructions and failed to ensure conduct proper handwashing, hairnet usage, and surface sanitization practices. The facility census was 30. 1. Review of the facility policy, Food Receiving and Storage, revised 11/2022, showed the following: -Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices; -Food services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean and temperature/humidity-appropriate food storage areas at all times; -Potentially Hazardous Foods (PHF) and Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods (food that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens) are stored at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the facility policy, Food and Nutrition Services, revised 10/2017, showed the following: -Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature; -Foods that are left without a source of heat (for hot foods) or refrigeration (for cold foods) longer than 2 hours will be discarded. Observations on 01/23/24 at 9:40 A.M., 10:42 A.M., 2:55 P.M., and 4:55 P.M., of the food preparation counter in the kitchen, showed a 4-pound container of whipped margarine was unrefrigerated. The label on the container read, Perishable, Keep Refrigerated. During an interview on 01/23/24 at 5:48 P.M., the Dietary Manager said the following: -She expected foods to be stored per the manufacturer's instructions such as for refrigeration; -She was unsure how long the container of whipped margarine had sat unrefrigerated on the food preparation counter but likely since that morning when staff used it for the breakfast meal. 2. Review of the facility policy, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised 11/2022, showed the following: -Food and nutrition services employees will follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness; -All employees who handle, prepare, or serve food are trained in the practices of safe food handling and preventing foodborne illness; -Hand Washing/Hand Hygiene - Employees must wash their hands: -after personal body functions (i.e. toileting, blowing/wiping nose, coughing, sneezing, etc.); -whenever entering or re-entering the kitchen; -before coming in contact with any food surfaces; -after handling raw meat, poultry, or fish and when switching between working with raw food and working with ready-to-eat food; -after handling soiled equipment or utensils; -during food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks, and/or; -after engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands; -Contact between food and bare (ungloved) hands is prohibited; -Gloves are considered single-use items and must be discarded after completing the task for which they are used; -Gloves are removed, hands are washed, and gloves are replaced: -after direct contact with residents; -between handling raw meats and ready-to-eat foods, and: -between handling soiled and clean dishes; -The use of disposable gloves does not substitute for proper handwashing; -Gloves are worn when directly touching ready-to-eat foods. Observation on 01/23/24 at 11:04 A.M., in the kitchen, showed the following: -Cook B used his/her gloved hands to pour out frozen raw beef patties from a plastic bag and arrange the patties onto a baking sheet; -He/She removed his/her gloves, and without washing his/her hands, returned the remaining bag of patties to the reach-in freezer, obtained a container of spices from a cabinet, sprinkled the spices onto the patties, and placed the sheet of patties into the oven; -He/She obtained a spoon from a drawer, stirred melted butter in a pan with the spoon, put on gloves without washing his/her hands, and prepared mashed potatoes in the pan by pouring instant potatoes and hot water in the pan and stirring the mixture. Observation on 01/23/24 at 11:21 A.M., in the kitchen, showed the following: -Cook B used his/her gloved hands to grab and place two handfuls of lettuce into the food processor and processed the lettuce by using his/her gloved hands to press the buttons on the food processor; -He/She removed his/her gloves, opened the door to the walk-in cooler and obtained a clear plastic container of diced tomatoes; -Without first washing his/her hands, he/she put on gloves and used his/her gloved fingers to place fingerfuls of processed lettuce from the food processor into serving bowls for the lunch meal service. Observation on 01/23/24 at 11:40 A.M., in the kitchen, showed the following: -Cook A washed his/her hands at the handwashing sink; -He/She used his/her bare hands to turn off the sink faucets, dried his/her hands with paper towels, put on gloves, and went to the food preparation counter; -Using his/her gloved hands, he/she grabbed hamburger buns from a bag and assembled sandwiches for the lunch meal service. Observation on 01/23/24 from 11:43 A.M. to 12:19 P.M., in the kitchen during the lunch meal service, showed the following: -Cook B wore gloves, put on oven mitts over his/her gloves, removed a pan of food from the oven, and placed a stack of metal plate warmers into the oven; -Cook B removed the oven mitts from his/her gloved hands, and without washing his/her hands or changing his/her gloves, he/she went to the steam table and served food onto residents' plates; -Throughout the meal service, [NAME] B opened the reach-in cooler to obtain food items, handled meal tickets, handled ready-to-eat sandwiches and bread slices and placed them onto residents' plates, put on oven mitts and removed hot plates from the oven, obtained disposable resident guest meal trays from a cabinet, and used a marker to write on the disposable trays; -Cook B changed his/her gloves several times, placed his/her used gloves on nearby preparation counters, and did not wash his/her hands. Observation on 01/23/24 at 5:06 P.M., in the kitchen during the dinner meal service, showed the following: -Dietary Aide G used his/her gloved hands to add food items to residents' plates, pump ketchup from a dispenser into condiment cups, and pick up and review paper meal tickets on residents' meal trays; -Without washing his/her hands or changing his/her gloves, he/she used his/her same gloved hands to pick up a sandwich and cut it into fourths (with scissors) on a resident's meal plate. Observation on 01/23/24 at 5:10 P.M., in the kitchen during the dinner meal service, showed the following: -CNA C entered the kitchen from the adjacent dining room, went to the food preparation counter where residents' plates were being prepared, and used his/her bare hands to pick up and open a hamburger bun on a resident's plate; -He/She did not wash his/her hands or put on gloves prior to touching the hamburger bun; -He/She touched his/her face with his/her hands, did not wash his/her hands, went to the dining room to obtain a glove from a nearby medication cart, and put the glove on his/her right hand; -He/She re-entered the kitchen, used his/her gloved right hand to hold the hamburger bun (that he/she previously touched) up to the ketchup dispenser, and used his/her bare left hand to push the ketchup dispenser pump handle to apply ketchup onto the bun; -He/She removed and discarded the glove from his/her right hand and delivered the resident's meal tray to the dining room; -He/She re-entered the kitchen, did not wash his/her hands, put a glove on his/her right hand, and used his/her gloved hand to reach into a bag of chips and place the chips onto a resident's plate. During an interview on 01/23/24 at 5:48 P.M., the Dietary Manager said the following: -Staff should wash their hands properly, including turning off the faucets using a paper towel rather than their clean hands; -Staff should wash their hands frequently such as when starting their shift and after performing dirty tasks; -She did not prefer staff to leave the food serving area while they were serving meals but changing staff's gloves did not substitute the need for handwashing; -Staff should not touch ready-to-eat food items with soiled gloves. 3. Review of the facility policy, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, revised 11/2022, showed hair nets or caps and/or beard restraints are worn when cooking, preparing, or assembling food to keep hair from contacting exposed food, clean equipment, utensils, and linens. Observation on 01/23/24 at 11:28 A.M., in the kitchen, showed the following: -The dietary manager used a knife to cut pieces of frosted cake for the lunch meal service and placed the pieces of cake onto plates. She wore a hairnet but approximately one inch of her hair was exposed and not covered by the hairnet; -The activity director prepared residents' beverages at the beverage preparation counter and took the beverages to residents in the adjacent dining room. Her hair was exposed and she did not wear a hairnet. Observation on 01/23/24 at 12:11 P.M., in the kitchen during the lunch meal service, showed the following: -CNA F prepared residents' drinks at the beverage preparation counter, located near the steam table and food preparation counter; -CNA F placed residents' drinks on the meal trays and took them to the dining room; -CNA F returned to the kitchen multiple times to prepare additional drinks and deliver additional trays to the dining room; -CNA F's hair was exposed and he/she did not wear a hairnet. Observation on 01/23/24 from 4:35 P.M. to 4:47 P.M., in the kitchen, showed the following: -Cook A prepared hamburger patties on the flattop griddle and placed the patties on approximately 12 open buns that sat on pieces of foil on the nearby food preparation counter; -An uncovered container of ground (mechanical soft texture) hamburger meat sat in the steam table, located next to the food preparation counter; -CNA C and CMT D entered the kitchen, stood near the uncovered buns, hamburger patties, and ground meat, and talked with [NAME] A; -Both CNA C's and CMT D's hair was exposed and neither staff wore a hairnet. Observation on 01/23/24 at 5:10 P.M., in the kitchen during the dinner meal service, showed the following: -Cook A served food items from the steam table onto resident plates and placed the plates on the food preparation counter; -Dietary Aide G and Dietary Aide H served pickles and onions, that were in open containers on the food preparation counter, onto the residents' plates; -NA E prepared residents' beverages at the beverage counter, located near the food preparation counter and steam table, and brought them to residents in the adjacent dining room. NA E's hair was exposed and he/she did not wear a hairnet; -CNA C entered the kitchen and assisted with adding ketchup to a residents' meal tray located on the food preparation counter. CNA C's hair was exposed and he/she did not wear a hairnet. During an interview on 01/23/24 at 5:48 P.M., the Dietary Manager said she expected staff and visitors to wear a hairnet while in the kitchen, especially during food preparation and serving activities. 4. Review of the facility policy Sanitization, revised 11/2022, showed the following: -The food service area is to be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner; -All equipment, food contact surfaces, and utensils are cleaned and sanitized using heat or chemical sanitizing solutions; -Chemical sanitizing solutions are used according to manufacturer's instructions; -Service area wiping cloths are cleaned and dried or placed in a chemical sanitizing solution of appropriate concentration Observation on 01/23/24 at 10:42 A.M., in the kitchen, showed the following: -Cook B dropped a clear plastic container of chicken on the floor near the reach-in cooler; -He/She picked up the container, obtained a light pink-colored cloth from a red bucket of sanitizing solution located in the three-compartment sink, and wiped the sides of the container with the cloth; -The cloth was visibly soiled a light-brown color on approximately 75% of the cloth's surface; -Without rinsing the cloth in the sanitizer solution or obtaining a new cloth, he/she used the same cloth to wipe the nearby food preparation counter surface. Observation on 01/23/24 at 4:59 P.M., in the kitchen, showed the following: -Cook A prepared food items on the food preparation counter and flat-top griddle; -He/She obtained a light pink-colored cloth from a red bucket of sanitizing solution located in the three-compartment sink; -He/She did not test the sanitizing solution in the red bucket for its level of chemical concentration; -The cloth was visibly soiled a light-brown color on approximately 75% of the cloth's surface; -He/She used the cloth to wipe the food preparation counter and stove top surface; -He/She returned the cloth to the red bucket and approximately 10% of the cloth was above the surface of the sanitizing solution and not submerged fully within the solution. During an interview on 01/23/24 at 5:48 P.M., the Dietary Manager said the following: -Staff should change the sanitizer solution, located in the red bucket in the three-compartment sink, in between shifts and whenever the sanitizer solution was soiled; -Staff did not measure the chemical levels or temperature of the sanitizer solution; -She was unaware of specific temperature or chemical parameters at which the sanitizer solution should be maintained.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0947 (Tag F0947)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide abuse, neglect, and exploitation training as part of the required minimum 12 hours of training per year. The facility census was 30...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide abuse, neglect, and exploitation training as part of the required minimum 12 hours of training per year. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's policy, Nurse Aide Qualifications and Training Requirements, dated August 2022, showed the following: -Nurse aides will have a minimum of 16 hours of training in the following areas prior to direct contact with the residents: 1. Resident rights including promoting the resident's right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, and neglect and the need to report any instances of such treatment to appropriate facility staff. Review of the facility's annual in-service binder on 1/25/24 at 10:42 A.M., showed the facility did not provide abuse/neglect training in 2023. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 10:47 A.M., the Social Services Director (SSD) said she maintained the training log and helped coordinate some trainings along with the acting Director of Nursing and maintenance director. During an interview on 1/25/24 at 10:51 A.M., the acting Director of Nursing said she knew there were certain required annual trainings but did not remember completing abuse/neglect training in the last year.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer to the resident and/or resident repres...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer to the resident and/or resident representative when four residents (Residents #3, #4, #13, and #20), in a review of 13 sampled residents, were transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's policy, Notice of Transfer or Discharge (Emergent or Therapeutic Leave), dated October 2022, showed the following: -Under the following circumstances, the notice is given as soon as practicable but before the transfer or discharge: a. The health and/or safety of individuals in the facility would be endangered due to the clinical or behavioral status of the resident; b. An immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs. -Notices are provided in a form and manner that the resident can understand, taking into account the resident ' s educational level, language, communication barriers, and physical or mental impairments. 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet showed the resident had a durable power of attorney. Review of the resident's progress note, dated 03/17/23 at 5:57 A.M., showed the following: -At about 3:00 A.M., the resident started coming in and out of room, irritable, yelling, went to the doors, set off alarms, and went into residents' rooms; -The resident's behavior continued to escalate until staff was continually trying to redirect the resident from other residents' rooms and outside; -The resident bit, hit, kicked, pulled hair, threw water and other articles at the staff; -The physician gave the order for resident to be sent out to hospital. Review of the resident's census showed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence the facility provided the resident or the resident's representative a written notice of transfer when the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. 2. Review of Resident #4's face sheet showed he/she had a durable power of attorney. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 7/20/23 at 1:38 P.M., showed the following: -The resident sat on the floor, next to the bed, leaning on his/her right hip, and screamed in pain; -The staff said the resident fell backwards and hit his/her left side on the bedside table and trash can; -The resident had a linear bruise with abrasion running along ribs on the right side, deformity to spine near rib injury as well as mild edema on rib line where abrasion and bruising was present; -The nurse applied supplemental oxygen on the resident at 2 liters/minute via nasal cannula due to pain, dyspnea (difficult or labored breathing) with respirations; -The resident hollered out in pain frequently while the staff was moving the resident; -The staff sent the resident to the hospital's emergency department. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 7/20/23 at 4:51 P.M., showed the resident was admitted to the hospital for multiple rib fractures on the left side and bleeding/hematoma (solid swelling of clotted blood within the tissues) in the left lung with the concerns of pain control and prevention of pneumonia. Review of the resident's census showed the resident returned to the facility on 7/22/23. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence the facility provided the resident or the resident's representative a written notice of transfer when the resident was transferred to the hospital on 7/20/23. 3. Review of Resident #13's face sheet showed the resident had a responsible party. Review of the resident's progress note, dated 12/21/23 at 12:13 P.M., showed the resident tested positive for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (common respiratory virus that in older adults are more likely to develop severe RSV and need hospitalization). Review of the resident's progress note, dated 12/21/23 at 2:30 P.M., showed the following: -The nurse noted the resident was coughing/choking and then hard to wake up; -The resident's oxygen saturation was 88% on room air (normal range 90-100%), moving very little air throughout lung fields, temperature 102.7 degrees Fahrenheit (F)(normal range of 94.0 degrees F to 99.6 degrees F) 45 minutes after Tylenol (fever reducer) was given, heart rate of 112 beats per minute (bpm)(normal range 60-100 beats per minute), and not eating or drinking; -The nurse sent the resident to the hospital's emergency department. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence the facility provided the resident or the resident's representative a written notice of transfer when the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of the resident's progress note, dated 1/6/24, showed the following: -The resident fell when exiting his/her room; -He/She sustained a 3 centimeter (cm) by 4 cm abrasion to the front scalp and several small skin tears to his/her hands; -Area under the resident's left eye began to bruise, and the resident complained of a headache and right knee pain; -The resident was transferred to the hospital's emergency department. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence the facility provided the resident or the resident's representative a written notice of transfer when the resident was transferred to the hospital on 1/6/24. 4. Review of Resident #20's face sheet showed he/she had a durable power of attorney. Review of the resident's progress notes showed the resident admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with complaints of chest pain which resulted in the placement of a pacemaker. Review of the resident's census showed the resident returned to the facility on 8/16/23. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation the facility provided the resident or the resident's representative a written notice of transfer when the resident was transferred to the hospital on 8/14/23. 5. During interview on 1/25/24 at 9:30 A.M., the administrative assistant said he/she was responsible for providing the transfer/discharge notices to the residents/resident representatives. He/She did not send notices when a resident went to the emergency room as she did not know where the resident would end up. She waited until the hospital (where they were admitted ) called the facility, and then he/she would send the notice.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information of the facility's bed hold policy to th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written information of the facility's bed hold policy to the resident and/or the resident's representative prior to transfers of a resident to the hospital for three residents (Resident #3, #4, and #20), in a review of 13 sampled residents. The facility census was 30. Review of the facility's policy, Bed-Holds and Returns, dated October 2022, showed the following: -All residents/representatives are provided written information regarding the facility and state bed-hold policies, which address holding or reserving a resident's bed during periods of absence (hospitalization or therapeutic leave). Residents, regardless of payer source, are provided written notice about these policies at least twice: a. Notice 1: well in advance of any transfer (e.g., in the admission packet); and b. Notice 2: at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). -Multiple attempts to provide the resident representative with Notice 2 should be documented in cases where staff were unable to reach and notify the representative timely; -The written bed-hold notice provided to the resident/representative explain in detail: a. The duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the facility; b. The reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan (for Medicaid residents); c. The facility policy regarding bed-hold periods; d. The facility per-diem rate required to hold a bed (for non-Medicaid residents), or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period (for Medicaid residents); and e. The facility return policy. 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet showed the resident had a durable power of attorney. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 3/17/23 at 4:52 P.M., showed the resident was admitted to the hospital. Review of the resident's census showed he/she was readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation the facility notified the resident's representative in writing of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital on 3/17/23. 2. Review of Resident #4's face sheet showed he/she had a durable power of attorney. Review of the resident's nurse note, dated 7/20/23 at 4:51 P.M., showed the resident was admitted to the hospital for multiple rib fractures on the left side and bleeding/hematoma (solid swelling of clotted blood within the tissues) in the left lung with the concerns of pain control and prevention of pneumonia. Review of the resident's census showed he/she returned to the facility on 7/22/23. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation the facility notified the resident's representative in writing of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital on 7/20/23. 3. Review of Resident #20's face sheet showed he/she had a durable power of attorney. Review of the resident's progress notes showed the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with complaints of chest pain which resulted in the placement of a pacemaker Review of the resident's census showed the resident returned to the facility on 8/16/23. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation the facility notified the resident's representative in writing of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital on 8/14/23. 4. During interview on 1/25/24 at 9:30 A.M., the administrative assistant said the following: -She was responsible for providing the bed hold policies to the residents/resident representatives; -She provided a copy of the bed hold policy upon the resident's admission to the facility; -Any time a resident was transferred and admitted to the hospital, she sent a letter stating the facility was required to send a copy of the bed hold policy, however she did not send a copy of the actual policy; -She did not provide a copy of the bed hold policy in writing at the time of a resident's transfer to the emergency room as she would not know if they were returning or not. If the hospital called and confirmed the resident was admitted to the hospital, she would then send the notice.
May 2021 8 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0678 (Tag F0678)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a policy addressing cardiopulmonary resuscita...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a policy addressing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, process of providing rescue ventilation and chest compressions to maintain circulation of blood) requirements for staff; and failed to ensure CPR certified staff were trained and available to provide CPR when transporting residents who requested to be a full code (CPR required in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest) in the facility van. This failure had the potential to affect two residents (Residents #33 and #35), in a review of 12 sampled residents, who were identified as full code status per their medical record. The facility census was 36. 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record showed he/she was full code status. Review of the facility's transportation calendar, located at the nurse's station, showed staff transported the resident in the facility van on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:47 A.M., Transportation Staff H said he/she transported the resident in the facility van to a physician appointment on [DATE]. 2. Review of Resident #35's medical record showed the following: -admission date [DATE]; -Full code status. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated [DATE], showed the resident was readmitted to the facility from the hospital. The resident arrived to the facility at 3:00 P.M. in the facility van, transported by Transportation Staff H. 3. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:30 A.M., Transportation Staff H said he/she, the maintenance director, and the housekeeping supervisor transported residents in the facility van. Review of the facility's list of CPR certified staff, provided by the facility on [DATE], showed the maintenance director, the housekeeping supervisor, and Transportation Staff H were not CPR certified. Review of Transportation Staff H's American Heart Association, Basic Life Support certification card showed his/her CPR certification expired [DATE]. 4. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:07 P.M., Transportation Staff H said his/her CPR certification expired in [DATE]. He/She was supposed to take the CPR course when it was offered at the facility in [DATE], but he/she missed the class because he/she was transporting a resident on the day of the class. The plan was for him/her to take the course at a later date, however, it never came due to COVID-19. He/She was the primary transporter and transported Residents #33 and #35 multiple times since [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:55 P.M., the administrator said the following: -He expected transportation staff to have an active CPR certification; -Transportation and nursing staff were the priority when scheduling CPR certification classes, however, the facility had to ensure they had enough staff for a class before they could schedule an individual from outside the facility to teach the course in the facility; -The previous Director of Nurses (DON) kept track of staff's CPR certification expiration dates and scheduled CPR certification classes once there were enough staff ready for the class. -The facility provided a CPR class late in 2019 and then were not able to conduct any additional CPR certification courses in the facility due to COVID-19 and only allowing essential workers into the facility; -The facility focused on care during the COVID-19 outbreak. The CPR certifications were not completed because other things (i.e. staffing, testing, ensuring sufficient supplies) took priority; -The current DON was trying to get into classes so she could teach the CPR certification course at the facility. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:10 P.M., the DON said the following: -An individual provided CPR training in the facility, however, he/she had been ill and was unable to teach the course; -She planned to take the train the trainer CPR course so she could teach CPR classes at the facility. Implementation of the facility's electronic medical record system was the priority and she had not yet taken the CPR course; -She planned to recertify the staff with expired CPR certifications once she completed the CPR train the trainer course.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to obtain physician's orders for the treatment of a St...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to obtain physician's orders for the treatment of a Stage II (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed without slough. May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister) pressure ulcer for two residents (Residents #15 and #23) in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility also failed to consistently complete and document assessments of residents' skin and failed to assess and document resident's risk for pressure ulcer development. The facility census was 36. Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, Version 3.0, Chapter 3, Section M, showed the definitions of the different stages of pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) as follows: -Stage I: an observable, pressure related alteration of intact skin, whose indicators as compared to an adjacent or opposite area on the body may include changes in skin temperature, tissue consistency, sensation, and/or a defined area of persistent redness; -Stage II: Partial thickness loss of dermis (the inner layer that makes up skin) presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed, without slough (non-viable yellow, tan, gray, green or brown tissue). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer/Skin Breakdown Policy, revised April 2018, showed the following: -The staff and practitioner will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers; -The physician will order pertinent wound treatments, including pressure reduction surfaces, wound cleansing, dressings, and application of topical agents; -Pressure Ulcer/Injury refers to localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence; -Stage I Pressure Injury is a non-blanchable redness of intact skin; -Stage II Pressure Injury appears as partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow, open, ulcer; -Assess the resident on admission for existing pressure ulcer risk factors. Repeat the risk assessment weekly and upon any changes in condition; -Inspect the resident's skin on a daily basis when performing or assisting with personal cares. 1. Review of Resident #15's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk, dated 1/23/20, showed the resident was not at risk for pressure ulcer development. (There were no further pressure ulcer risk assessments found in the resident's record after 1/23/20.) Review of the resident's Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff), dated 3/19/21, showed the following: -Diagnosis of dementia; -Cognition was severely impaired; -Required limited assistance from one staff for bed mobility, transfers, walking, toilet use, and bathing; -At risk for pressure ulcer development; -No unhealed pressure ulcers. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 3/22/21, showed it did not include the resident's risk for pressure ulcer development as assessed on the MDS dated [DATE]. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 4/18/21 at 10:34 P.M. showed the nurse found a sore place on the resident's buttock. A small slit was noted in the gluteal crevice. The area was washed with soap and water, rinsed, and treatment balm was applied. Will report to oncoming shift and continue to monitor. There was no documentation found in the record showing the physician was contacted for orders to treat the area. Review of the resident's physician order sheet (POS) for May 2021 showed an order for Nystatin (antifungal) powder to reddened areas under the resident's chest as needed. There were no other orders on the POS for treatment balms or creams to the resident's buttocks or open areas. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 5/20/21, at 9:46 P.M. showed after getting a bath the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) called the nurse to the shower room. The resident had an area on his/her bottom that was bleeding. The area is in the inner bottom of the coccyx, approximately 2.5 centimeters (cm) in length by 0.2 cm in width. The depth could not be measured. Calmoseptine (topical medication used to treat minor skin irritations) and Nystatin powder were applied to the area. There was no documentation found in the record showing the physician was contacted for orders to treat the area. Observation on 5/27/21 at 9:15 A.M. of the resident with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) G in the shower room showed the following: -CNA G undressed the resident for a shower; -CNA G separated the resident's buttocks which revealed a narrow, open, area to the resident's coccyx. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 9:20 A.M. CNA G said he/she was not aware the resident had an open area on his/her bottom. No one had said anything about it to CNA G. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 10:45 A.M. CNA F said he/she was not aware the resident had any open areas or wounds. The resident was able to take himself/herself to the bathroom. Staff did not apply any cream or ointments to the resident that CNA F was aware of. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 10:50 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) A said CNA G told him/her about the resident having an open area that morning. That was the first time RN A had heard anything about it. RN A would assess the area when the resident arrived back to the facility from an outing with family. RN A said he/she tried to complete the skin assessments for residents on Wednesdays but was now trying to divide the assessments up during the week. It was very difficult to get all the skin assessments completed for residents in one day and he/she thought a better system was needed. RN A used to document the skin assessments in the progress notes but that had been changed to the wound management tab in the electronic record. RN A would contact the physician after he/she assessed the resident's open area so he/she could provide a more detailed description and obtain treatment orders. Resident #15 sat in his/her chair frequently and may benefit from a Roho (cushion with individual cells of air that adapt to the user's body) cushion. Observation on 5/27/21 at 12:57 P.M. showed the following: -RN A and Certified Medication Technician (CMT) E entered the resident's room; -CMT E assisted the resident to stand and lower his/her pants and brief; -RN A assessed the resident's coccyx and observed the open area; -RN A measured the area and found it was 2.2 cm in length, by 0.3 cm in width, by 0.19 cm in depth. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 1:03 P.M. CMT E said he/she was the staff member who found the open area while in the shower room on 5/20/21. The area was bleeding when CMT E discovered it. The charge nurse came and looked at the open area. The nurse gave CMT E some Calmoseptine ointment to put on the area. That was the only time CMT E put anything on the open area. CMT E did not know if any other staff had treated the area with anything. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 1:05 P.M. RN A said the open area on the resident's coccyx was a Stage II pressure ulcer. The ulcer was in a bad spot and could become much worse if not treated. 2. Review of Resident #23's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk, dated 10/02/18, showed the resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Review of the resident's medical record showed no further pressure ulcer risk assessments completed after 10/02/18. Review of the resident's Physicians Order, dated 01/20/21, showed the following: -Silvadene cream 1% (a topical antibiotic used in partial thickness and full thickness burns to prevent infection); -Administer: Small amount; topical as needed; -Apply to open areas as needed (PRN). Notify physician when reinitiated. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 03/30/21, showed the following: -Diagnosis of dementia impaired cognition; -Required extensive assistance from one staff for bed mobility; -Required extensive assistance from two or more staff for transfers to or from bed, chair, wheelchair, and standing position; -Required full assistance from one staff for moves between locations; -Required extensive assistance from one staff for dressing; -At risk of pressure ulcers; -Pressure reducing device for chair (equipment that aims to relieve pressure away from areas of high risk for skin breakdown); -Receives applications of ointments/medications other than to feet. Review of the resident's care plan, reviewed/revised 04/02/21, showed the following: -Pressure ulcers: The resident was at risk for skin breakdown; -Assess for presence of risk factors. Treat, reduce, eliminate risk factors to extent possible; -Keep skin clean and dry; -Clean, dry, wrinkle free linens; -Scheduled skin inspections on routine basis paying close attention to bony prominences; -Reposition on routine and PRN rounds; -Off load areas of concern including heals; -Avoid shearing skin while positioning, transferring and turning; -Protect bony prominences by preventing contact with one another with pillows, padding or dressings; -Educate staff to report any signs and symptoms of skin breakdown to charge nurse. Apply dressing and treatments to areas of concern per orders. -Care Plan Reviewed/Revised on 05/14/21 to include turn and reposition every two hours. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 05/17/21 at 1:28 P.M., showed staff completed a skin assessment. The resident had a red area on his/her right outer foot. The area was not open or draining. Skin prep (a liquid film-forming dressing that, upon application to intact skin, forms a protective film) and moon boots (heel protectors, a medical device usually constructed of foam, air-cushioning, gel, or fiber-filling, designed to offload pressure from the heel to help prevent pressure ulcers) applied. Will continue to monitor. Review of the resident's Physicians Order, dated 05/17/21, showed an order to apply skin prep on any reddened areas that are not open twice a day. Apply to bilateral feet. Check for open areas. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 5/17/21 through 5/24/21, showed no documentation related to the condition of the resident's skin. Review of the resident's Treatment Administration Record, dated May 2021, showed the following: -Staff applied skin prep (on reddened areas to bilateral feet) on the evening shift on 5/17/21 and twice daily on 5/18/21 through 5/25/21; -No evidence staff applied Silvadene cream as needed to any open areas. Observation on 5/25/21 at 1:55 P.M. showed the resident lay in bed. The resident wore moon boots on both of his/her feet. During an interview on 5/25/21 at 1:55 P.M., CNA C said the resident had a small wound on his/her right ankle. Observation on 05/26/21 at 1:25 P.M. showed CNA F and CNA J removed the moon boot from the resident's right foot. The resident had a scabbed area, approximately the size of a pencil eraser, on the outer aspect of his/her right ankle. The skin surrounding the scabbed area was slightly raised and reddened. During an interview on 5/26/21 at 1:25 P.M., CNA F said the area on the resident's ankle looked better than it did two days ago. The area was now scabbed over. He/She said nursing was aware and was applying skin prep. During interview on 05/27/21 at 10:10 A.M., CNA I, CNA J and CNA F said the area on the resident's ankle went from a red area to a wound approximately a week ago. During interview on 05/27/21 at 10:35 AM., RN A said he/she was still considering the resident as having a red area with toughened skin on his/her right ankle. Once an area was identified, nursing staff monitored it and measured it weekly. Staff notified the physician when a red area turned to an opened area. The facility was still considering the resident as having a red area on his/her right ankle, so staff had not notified the resident's physician. The resident currently received skin prep on the area twice per day; morning and evening. Observation of the resident's right outer ankle with RN A on 5/27/21 at 12:38 P.M. showed a scabbed area approximately the size of a pencil eraser. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 12:40 P.M., RN A said the resident had a scab on his/her right ankle for the past couple days. He/She had not measured the area. He/She applied skin prep on the scab the past two days. He/She was not sure how a scab would have formed on a reddened area to the resident's right outer ankle unless the skin had opened up at some point. RN A was not aware the skin on the resident's ankle had opened. RN A said he/she thought the area was caused by pressure which started as a Stage I. If the skin on the resident's ankle had broken open at some point, then it would be a Stage II pressure ulcer. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 11:28 A.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) said RN A was responsible for completing and documenting weekly skin assessments and weekly wound measurements for residents. The DON was not aware the area to Resident #23's ankle was ever open. It was reported to him/her the area was red. The DON had not assessed the area for himself/herself. The DON was not aware Resident #15 had an open area until that morning. The DON expected the nurses to notify the physician for treatment orders whenever an open area was found and to continue to document assessments and measurements of the areas.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0568 (Tag F0568)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements of the resident trust funds account to the resident or their representative for all residents wh...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quarterly statements of the resident trust funds account to the resident or their representative for all residents who maintained a balance in the resident trust fund, including petty cash. The facility census 36. During an interview on 6/7/21 at 11:18 A.M., the administrator said the facility had not been able to locate a written policy on quarterly statements provided to residents or their representatives. Review of the facility's current balance report for the resident trust fund savings account, dated 5/24/21, showed the facility managed funds in the account for two residents. Observation on 5/25/21 at 3:40 P.M. showed the facility managed petty cash (as a part of the resident trust fund) for 21 residents. During an interview on 5/26/21 at 2:30 P.M., the administrative assistant said the facility only sent quarterly statements of residents' fund balances to the residents and/or their representative for residents who had money in the resident trust fund savings account. The facility did not send quarterly statements to residents or their representatives for residents who only had petty cash. He/She was not aware the facility was required to send quarterly statements to the residents who only had money in the petty cash fund.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to the Ombudsman, the resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to the Ombudsman, the resident, and/or resident representative when five residents (Resident #10, #15,#16, #31 and #35), in a review of 12 sampled residents, were transferred to the hospital. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's Notice of Emergency Transfers (undated) showed the following: -When a resident is temporarily transferred on an emergency basis to an acute care facility. notice of the transfer may be provided to the resident and resident representative as soon as practicable, according to 42 CFR 483.15; -Documentation in the resident progress notes stating the resident or resident representative has been notified will meet the criteria for notification of emergency transfer. 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record showed the following: -The resident was discharged from the facility to the emergency room on 3/28/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged to the emergency room on 4/7/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged to the emergency room on 4/16/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged to the emergency room on 5/16/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. -No documentation the facility notified the Ombudsman or provided written notice to the resident and/or responsible party of the resident's transfers to the hospital on 3/28/21, 4/7/21, 4/16/21, and 5/16/21. 2. Review of Resident #35's medical record showed the following: -The resident was discharged from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged to the hospital on 4/15/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged to the hospital on 5/15/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -No documentation the facility notified the Ombudsman or provided written notice to the resident and/or responsible party of the resident's transfers on 11/26/20, 4/15/21, or 5/15/21 3. Review of Resident #16's medical record showed the following: -The resident was sent to the hospital for a blood transfusion on 5/19/21; -The resident returned to the facility on 5/19/21. -No documentation the facility notified the Ombudsman or provided written notice to the resident and/or responsible party of the resident's transfer to the hospital on 5/19/21. 4. Review of Resident #10's medical record showed the following: -The resident was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 2/5/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -No documentation the facility notified the Ombudsman or provided written notice to the resident and/or responsible party of the resident's transfer on 2/5/21. 5. Review of Resident #15's medical record showed the following: -The resident was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 3/3/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -No documentation the facility notified the Ombudsman or provided written notice to the resident and/or responsible party of the resident's transfer on 3/3/21. 6. During interview on 5/27/21 at 8:00 A.M., the community coordinator said the following: -Nursing staff may be responsible for providing written notices of discharge or transfer; -He/She was not aware the facility had to notify the Ombudsman of residents' transfers and discharges or provide written notice to the resident or responsible party. During interview on 5/27/21 at 8:15 A.M., the social services/activity director said the following: -She had never sent anything to the Ombudsman regarding residents' transfers or discharges; -She was not aware the facility had to notify the Ombudsman of residents' transfers and discharges. During interview on 5/27/21 at 12:25 P.M., the director of nursing (DON) said the following: -She had not sent anything to the Ombudsman regarding residents' transfers or discharges; -She was not aware the facility had to notify the Ombudsman of residents' transfers and discharges or provide written notice to the resident or responsible party. During an interview on 6/7/21 at 11:18 A.M., the administrator said he/she was aware it was required the facility provide written notice of transfer to the Ombudsman, the resident, and/or resident representative when a resident was discharged to the hospital, and it was his/her expectation the facility staff would do so.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and resident representatives of the facility's bed...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and resident representatives of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for five residents (Resident #10, #15, #16, #31, and #35), who were transferred to the hospital, in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's Bed Holds and Returns Policy, revised March 2017, showed the following: -Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy; -The written information given to residents and the resident representatives will explain in detail the rights and limitations of the resident regarding bed-holds, the reserve bed payment policy, the facility daily rate required to hold a bed, and the details of the transfer. 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record showed the following: -admission date 2/4/20; -The resident was discharged from the facility to the emergency room on 3/28/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged from the facility to the emergency room on 4/7/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged from the facility to the emergency room on 4/16/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged from the facility to the emergency room on 5/16/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. -No documentation the resident or his/her representative was informed in writing of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital on 3/28/21, 4/7/21, 4/16/21, and 5/16/21. 2. Review of Resident #35's medical record showed the following: -admission date 4/5/19; -The resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged to the hospital on 4/15/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -The resident was discharged to the hospital on 5/15/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -No documentation the resident or his/her representative was informed in writing of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer on 11/26/20, 4/15/21, and 5/15/21. 3. Review of Resident #16's medical record showed the following: -admission date 3/14/21; -The resident was sent from the facility to the hospital for a blood transfusion on 5/19/21; -The resident returned to the facility on 5/19/21. -No documentation the resident or his/her representative was informed in writing of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital on 5/19/21. 4. Review of Resident #10's medical record showed the following: -Original admission date 12/9/13; -The resident was discharged to the hospital on 2/5/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -No documentation the resident or representative was informed in writing of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer on 2/5/21. 5. Review of Resident #15's medical record showed the following: -admission date 1/2/20; -The resident was discharged to the hospital on 3/3/21; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -No documentation the resident or representative was informed in writing of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer on 3/3/21. 6. During interview on 5/27/21 at 8:00 A.M., the community coordinator said the following: -He/She explained the facility bed hold policy on admission to new residents with the admission process; -He/She informed new residents or their power of attorney on admission they were required to pay out of pocket to hold their existing bed and room when transferred out of the facility; -He/She did not inform residents at the time of transfer in writing of the facility bed hold policy. He/She only reviewed the bed hold policy information at the time of admission. During interview on 5/27/21 at 12:25 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said she was not aware the facility was to provide a written bed hold policy to residents or responsible party at the time of discharge or transfer. During an interview on 6/7/21 at 11:18 A.M., the administrator said he/she was aware it was required the facility provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to the resident, and/or resident representative when a resident was discharged to the hospital, and it was his/her expectation the facility staff would do so.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement, evaluate, and modify interventions as nece...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement, evaluate, and modify interventions as necessary to address prevention of falls for two residents (Resident #10 and # 22) with a history of repeated falls, and failed to evaluate the safety risks and provide adequate monitoring for one resident (Resident #31) to prevent injury while smoking. A sample of 12 residents was selected for review. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's Falls-Clinical Protocol Policy, revised March 2018, showed the following: -The staff and practitioner will review each resident's risk factors for falling and document in the medical record; -The staff will evaluate and document falls that occur while the individual is in the facility; -If the resident continues to fall, the staff and physician will re-evaluate the situation and reconsider possible reasons for the resident's falling and also reconsider the current interventions; -Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes and try to prevent the resident from falling and try to minimize complications from falling; -Within 24 hours of the fall, begin to identify possible or likely causes if the incident. Refer to resident specific evidence including medical history and known functional impairments. Identify if there is a pattern of falls for the resident; -Complete an incident report for resident falls no later than 24 hours after the fall occurs. The incident report should be completed by the nursing supervisor on duty at the time and submitted to the Director of Nursing. Review of the undated facility policy, Smoking Guidelines for Residents, showed the following: -Residents may smoke in designated areas: the front porch (weather permitting) or the smoking room located at the staff entrance on the north side of building; -Any residents with restricted smoking privileges requiring monitoring shall have the direct supervision of a staff member, family member, visitor, or volunteer worker at all times while smoking; -Smoking times are dependent upon staff availability and care needs of all residents in building. 1. Review of Resident #10's Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff, dated 2/29/21, showed the following: -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, anxiety, and depression; -Cognition was severely impaired; -Required assistance of one staff for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and hygiene; -Balance was not steady and only able to stabilize with human assistance when moving from a seated to a standing position, moving off the toilet and during surface to surface transfers; -No falls since the previous assessment. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 2/28/21, showed staff found the resident on the floor. The resident appeared to be rolled in a blanket. No injuries were noted. The resident was combative with staff and vital signs were unable to be obtained. Review of the Post Fall Investigation, dated 2/28/21 at 1:30 A.M., showed the following: -Patterns with falls included increased restlessness; -Contributing factors were agitation and resident non-compliance; -The fall occurred in the resident's room; -There was no injury; -The resident rolled out of bed; -The bed was in the lowest position; -Summary: The resident was sleeping in bed and rolled out when turning over or adjusting the blanket. The resident was combative and it was hard to position him/her well in bed; -Planned systemic interventions/changes were not listed on the investigation. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on 3/3/21, showed the following: -The resident had a history of falls related to unsteady gait and poor balance; -Ensure the resident has the wheelchair close for transfers and propelling; -Encourage the resident to assume a standing position slowly when staff are assisting with ambulation and have a wheeled walker; -Keep the room free of clutter and keep frequently used items within reach; -Keep the bed in lowest position with the brakes locked; -Use a floor mat beside the bed at night; -Keep the call light and water pitcher within reach; -Recently additions were added to the wheelchair that automatically lock if the resident attempts to stand; -The resident requires more assistance and has had an increase in falls. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 3/19/21 at 10:21 A.M., showed the resident slid out of his/her wheelchair onto the floor while napping in the chair in the hallway. Another resident observed the resident and called staff for assistance. Staff assessed the resident and no injuries were found. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff completed a Post Fall Investigation for the fall on 3/19/21 and no updates were made to the resident's care plan. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 4/7/21 at 10:45 A.M., showed the resident had an unwitnessed fall in the hallway. The resident leaned forward in the wheelchair and slid out of the wheelchair onto the floor. The resident denied pain and there were no apparent injuries. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 4/9/21 at 2:03 A.M., showed the resident's left arm was swollen and bruised, possibly from recent fall. Review of the resident's Post Fall Investigation, dated 4/9/21 at 7:45 P.M. showed the following: -Patterns with falls included non-compliance; -Contributing factors were attempting to self-transfer; -The fall occurred in the resident's room; -There was no injury; -Summary: The resident was sitting in the wheelchair at the side of the bed. Staff witnessed the resident attempt to self-transfer from the wheelchair to the bed and land on his/her knees; -Planned systemic interventions/changes were not listed on the investigation. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 4/9/21. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 4/11/21 at 1:30 P.M., showed the resident slid out of the wheelchair onto the floor. The resident sustained a skin tear to the right elbow that staff cleansed and dressed. Review of the resident's Post Fall Investigation, dated 4/11/21 at 1:30 P.M., showed the following: -Patterns with falls included increased restlessness; -Contributing factors were dementia; -The fall occurred in the hallway; -The resident sustained a 1.5 centimeter skin tear to the right elbow; -Summary: The resident slid out of the wheelchair onto his/her bottom; -Planned systemic interventions/changes: The resident needs frequent monitoring/care plan. Might need a lap buddy (a cushioned device that fits in a wheelchair across the lap to prevent the resident not to get up on his/her own). Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 4/11/21. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 4/23/21 at 1:22 P.M., showed the resident was at the nurse's station and went forward out of the wheelchair onto the floor. The fall was witnessed and the resident hit his/her head. Review of the resident's Post Fall Investigation, dated 4/23/21 at 12:45 P.M. showed the following: -Patterns with falls included increased restlessness; -Contributing factors were agitation and non-compliance; -The fall occurred at the nurse's station; -The resident sustained a small skin tear to the right eyebrow; -Summary: The resident went straight forward out of the wheelchair at the nurse's station; -Planned systemic interventions/changes were not listed on the investigation. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 4/23/21. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 5/4/21 at 5:45 P.M., showed the resident leaned over and fell forward out of the wheelchair at the nurse's station. Staff witnessed the fall and there was no injury noted. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff completed a Post Fall Investigation for the fall on 5/4/21 and no updates were made to the resident's care plan. Review of the resident's fall risk score, dated 5/6/21, showed the resident was at high risk for falls. (There was no other fall risk assessments found in the resident's record.) Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 5/8/21 at 3:00 P.M., showed the resident's alarm went off. Staff found the resident on the floor in the dining room. There were no injuries noted. Review of the resident's Post Fall Investigation, dated 5/8/21 at 3:07 P.M., showed the following: -Contributing factors: None; -There was no injury; -Summary: The resident's alarm started sounding and staff found the resident on the floor in the dining room. The resident attempted to transfer himself/herself; -Immediate measures taken: Chair/Wheelchair alarm. (The chair alarm was already in place and alarmed when the resident fell.) Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 5/8/21. Observation on 5/25/21 at 8:48 A.M. showed the resident sat in a wheelchair in his/her room. The resident had a tab alarm (an electronic alarm with one end attached to the resident's clothing and the other end connected to the alarm with a magnet. The alarm sounds if the magnet pulls away from the alarm) connected to his/her shirt and to the wheelchair. The resident's eyes were closed and he/she was bent forward at the waist. Observation on 5/25/21 at 11:37 A.M. showed the resident slept in his/her bed with a tab alarm attached to the resident. The bed was in the lowest position. Review of the resident's undated Kardex (miniature care plan) located in a binder at the nurse's station on 5/26/21 at 2:00 P.M., showed it did not include the resident's fall risk or interventions in place to prevent falls. During an interview on 5/26/21 at 1:20 P.M., the MDS Coordinator said the resident fell several times. The resident used a tab alarm but he/she would remove the alarm. Staff tried to educate the resident to use the call light without success. Some staff liked to keep the resident at the nurse's station for closer monitoring. The resident liked sweets, and snacks would keep the resident engaged and keep him/her from trying to get up on his/her own. The staff had used the tab alarm for the resident for quite a while. The tab alarm should be included on the resident's care plan. The MDS Coordinator reviewed the resident's care plan and said the last update to the resident's fall care plan was on 3/3/21. The care plan should be updated with additional interventions after a resident falls. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 12:08 P.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) D said the resident fell frequently. The resident tried to get up on his/her own without assistance. The resident used a tab alarm in the bed and in the chair, which he/she has had in place for a long time. 2. Review of Resident #22's admission assessment care plan, dated 9/13/19, showed the following: -The resident has problems regarding falls, ambulation, transfer and balance; -Interventions include transfer with one staff assist (plus independence), use of gait belt, and monitor for fall, unsteady gait and loss of balance. Review of the resident's Significant Change in Status Assessment MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), hypertension, and transient cerebral ischemic attack (a brief stroke-like attack that happens when blood flow to part of the brain is blocked or reduced); -Cognition was severely impaired; -Required assistance from one or more staff for bed mobility, transfers, walking, toilet use, and hygiene; -Balance was not steady and only able to stabilize with human assistance when moving from a seated to standing position, walking, moving on and off the toilet, and during surface to surface transfers; -Mobility devices included a wheelchair; -Two or more falls with injury since the previous assessment. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 8/6/20, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 8/6/20 at 1:45 P.M.; -The resident fell out of the wheelchair onto the floor of the resident's room; -Staff noted the resident was reaching for the trash can located on the floor and slid out of the wheelchair; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included increased restlessness and dementia; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -No planned systemic interventions/changes were noted. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 8/6/20. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 8/8/20, showed the following: -The resident had a witnessed fall on 8/8/20 at 5:15 P.M.; -The resident fell out of the wheelchair onto the floor of the resident's room; -Staff noted the resident was reaching for items on the table and slid out of the wheelchair; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included increased restlessness, agitation, and dementia; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -Planned systemic interventions/changes noted tab/pad alarms were in place, frequent redirection, and continued monitoring. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report and Resident Progress Notes, dated 8/23/20, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 8/23/20 at 12:30 P.M.; -The resident fell out of the wheelchair onto the floor by the couch of the facility's TV room; -Staff noted the resident was trying to move the couch in the TV room; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns and contributing factors listed included increased restlessness and dementia; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -Planned systemic interventions/changes noted to continue plan of care with frequent monitoring of the resident. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 9/1/20, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 9/1/20 at 6:30 P.M.; -The resident fell out of the wheelchair onto the fall mat located on the floor near the bed of the resident's room; -Staff noted the resident was reaching over to the bed for a toothpick he/she thought was on the bed and the wheelchair had fallen over backward; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included increased restlessness and dementia; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -Planned systemic interventions/changes noted continued use of hi-low bed and fall mat. Continue to monitor resident closely with tab and pad alarms being used. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 9/14/20, showed the following: -The resident had a witnessed fall on 9/14/20 at 6:00 A.M.; -The resident slid out of the lowered bed onto the fall mat located on the floor by the bed of the resident's room; -Staff noted the resident was trying to get up without assistance; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included dementia; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -Planned systemic interventions/changes noted to continue to monitor with tab/pad alarms. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised 9/14/20 at 6:41 A.M., showed the following: -The resident has a history of falling. Care plan goal included the resident will remain free from injury; -The resident had several falls while at home and has had several falls since admission to the facility; -Interventions have been put in place such as a fall mat, dignity pressure alarm and tab alarm; -The resident is unaware of his/her limitations. Staff should monitor the resident frequently for fall prevention; -Staff should offer to walk with the resident if he/she becomes restless. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 9/18/20, showed the following: -The resident had a witnessed fall on 9/18/20 at 6 A.M.; -The resident tried to stand up out of the wheelchair, slid, and caught his/her legs in the wheelchair in the resident's room; -The resident had a minor injury from this fall, which included a small cut/scrape on the resident's left calf and thigh and right ankle; -Patterns/contributing factors included going to the bathroom, non-compliant resident; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -No planned systemic interventions/changes were noted. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 9/18/20. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 9/20/20, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 9/20/20 at 3:15 P.M.; -The resident's door was closed and the resident was found sitting on the floor at the side of the bed in the resident's room; -Staff noted that the resident was attempting to pick up the phone off of floor and slid out of the wheelchair; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included increased restlessness, dementia, and no safety awareness; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -Planned systemic interventions/changes noted to continue current plan of care and keep resident door open unless staff were doing cares for the resident. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff updated the resident's care plan with the new interventions following the resident's fall on 9/20/20. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 10/23/20, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 10/23/20 at 2:45 P.M.; -The resident was found on the floor lying on his/her left side with a toothbrush in his/her hand; -Staff noted the resident fell out of the wheelchair and was attempting to spit in the trash can; -The resident had a minor injury from this fall, which included a skin tear on the resident's left arm; -Patterns/contributing factors included going to the bathroom, non-compliant resident; -Resident health care status change noted prior to fall included low oxygen and crackles in the lungs; -No planned systemic interventions/changes were noted. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 10/23/20. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 11/5/20, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 11/5/20 at 7:25 P.M.; -The resident was found on the floor lying on the resident's left side; -Staff noted the resident fell out of the wheelchair while having respiratory treatment and reaching for a cover; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included increased restlessness, specific activity, location, and non-compliant resident; -Resident health care status change noted prior to fall included dyspnea, cough, and use of oxygen; -No planned systemic interventions/changes were noted. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 11/5/20. Review of resident's Progress Notes, dated 11/17/20, showed the following: -At 7:00 P.M., the resident was restless and attempted to self-transfer, and received an injury (skin tear to left wrist) from hitting the door frame when he/she lost balance and started to go down; -Staff eased the resident down and then back to the wheelchair. Staff administered first aid to the resident's injury; -No planned systemic interventions/changes were noted. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 12/27/20, showed the following: -The resident had a witnessed fall on 12/27/20 at 5:30 P.M.; -Staff noted the resident was sitting in his/her wheelchair in the hallway near the nurse's station. The resident was attempting to assist another resident by pushing the other resident's wheelchair, and the resident slid gently out of the wheelchair onto floor; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included increased restlessness, specific activity, non-compliant resident; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -Planned systemic interventions/changes noted continued use of tab and pad alarms and frequent reminders. Review of resident's Quarterly Review Assessment MDS, dated [DATE], showed two or more falls (no injury) since the previous assessment Review of resident's Progress Notes, dated 1/3/21 at 8:41 P.M., showed the following: -The resident made many attempts to use the hand rails to stand; -The resident said he/she wanted to get out and walk. He/She was looking for his/her spouse, and attempted to exit through the rear door (setting off alarm with Wanderguard); -The resident's alarm sounded and staff observed the resident sliding out of the wheelchair onto the floor; -No resident injury noted from this fall. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff completed a Post Fall Investigation Report following the resident's fall on 1/3/21. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 1/3/21. Review of resident's Progress Notes, dated 1/14/21 at 9:00 A.M., showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 1/14/21 at 8:30 A.M.; -Staff noted the resident fell out of the wheelchair; -Resident said he/she was trying to get out of the bed to answer the door; -Injury to the resident included a previous skin tear that was opened on left arm with a small amount of bleeding; Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff completed a Post Fall Investigation Report following the resident's fall on 1/14/21. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 1/14/21. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 2/7/21, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 2/7/21 at 12:30 P.M.; -The resident was found on the floor in front of the recliner in the resident's room; -Staff noted the resident was attempting to get up out of the wheelchair without assistance; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included dementia, low oxygen saturation, and non-compliant resident; -Resident health care status change noted prior to fall included declining general status; -Planned systemic interventions/changes noted included closer monitoring of resident activity, monitor wearing of oxygen, and explore the possibility of a different wheelchair. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff updated the resident's care plan with the interventions identified on the Post Fall Investigation Report following the resident's fall on 2/7/21 at 12:30 P.M. Review of resident's Progress Notes, dated 2/7/21 at 3:21 P.M., showed the following: -Staff heard the resident's alarms sound and found the resident on the floor; -The resident said he/she was trying to stand up; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Staff assisted the resident to the recliner and raised the foot rest. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 2/18/21, showed the following: -The resident had a witnessed fall on 2/18/21 at 5:45 A.M.; -Staff was coming around the hall corner and witnessed the resident trying to roll his/her wheelchair onto the digital scale, tipping both over; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included non-compliant resident; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -Planned systemic interventions/changes included re-educating on fall interventions. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff updated the resident's care plan with the new interventions following the resident's fall on 2/18/21. Review of the Post Fall Investigation Report, dated 2/25/21, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 2/25/21 at 7 P.M.; -The resident was found on the floor of the resident's room; -Staff noted the resident would not ask for help. The resident told staff he/she didn't need help to get ready for bed, and said, I wanted to get myself ready for bed. -No resident injury noted from this fall; -Patterns/contributing factors included increased restlessness; -No recent change in the resident's health care status noted prior to fall; -No planned systemic interventions/changes were noted. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 2/25/21. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed two or more (no injury) and one (injury) fall since the previous assessment. Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 4/9/21 at 9:02 A.M., showed the following: -The resident received a new wheelchair today with a seat belt; -The resident kept removing the seat belt causing the alarm to sound and it was replaced each time; -The resident likes the new chair so far but did scoot to the edge even with the seat belt in place. Staff repositioned the resident. Review of resident's progress notes, dated 4/12/21 at 12:23 P.M., showed the following: -The resident has a safety belt with alarm and he/she is able to self-remove the belt; -Staff provided a tab alarm for the resident to use at bed time due to a history of falls. Review of resident's Progress Notes, dated 4/14/21 at 6:49 A.M., showed the following: -At 6:00 A.M., the resident's tab alarm sounded. Staff found the resident with oxygen off. Staff found the resident lying on the fall mat with his/her feet in the air; -Staff noted the resident said, I had to shut the gate before the cows got out.; -Injuries noted included re-opening of a few small scabs on the resident's shin and monitoring of the resident due to the resident indicating bumping of his/her head. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff completed a Post Fall Investigation Report following the resident's fall on 4/14/21. Review of the resident's care plan showed no evidence staff evaluated current interventions or updated the resident's care plan with new interventions following the resident's fall on 4/14/21. Review of the resident's Fall Report, dated 5/10/21, showed the following: -The resident had a witnessed fall on 5/10/21 at 8:15 P.M.; -The resident fell onto the floor of the resident's room; -Staff was in the room with the resident, getting ready to assist with evening cares for the resident. The resident moved too close to the edge of the wheelchair, then fell out of the wheelchair onto his/her knees; -The resident had an injury from this fall, which included a scratch on the resident's left knee and a torn fingernail on the resident's left ring finger; -Patterns/contributing factors included cardiac/respiratory disease and possible infection with lab work obtained; -Staff noted new onset/change in mental status of agitation, confusion, and lethargy. (Staff noted these are present at this time of night, and indicated the resident is short tempered and more weak when tired); -Interventions in place included bed alarm, chair/wheelchair alarm, education (call light information), fall mat, high/low bed and positioning wedge with interventions indicated as effective; -Staff indicated staff would leave a note for the care plan nurse; -Falls prevention plan noted as not initiated due to ongoing, and that staff would continue current care plan and speak with family regarding possible ideas for further updates; -Care plan updated is marked as Yes on report. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff obtained any labs to rule out a possible infection as identified in the fall report, dated 5/10/21. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised 5/17/21, showed the following: -The resident attempts to stand and self-transfer to toilet or without assistance; -The resident has a seat belt alarm system to prevent falls while in wheelchair. The resident is able to demonstrate knowledge of how to release the seat belt; -The resident also uses a tab alarm while in bed or recliner to prevent falls. Review of the resident's Fall Report, dated 5/19/21, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 5/19/21 at 7:39 P.M.; -The resident fell onto the floor of the resident's bathroom while still seat belted in the wheelchair; -Staff noted the resident was brushing his/her teeth in the bathroom prior to the fall; -The resident had an injury which included a small laceration to the right parietal area (the upper back portion of the skull); -No patterns/contributing factors were indicated; -No change in mental status were noted; -Interventions in place included bed alarm, chair/wheelchair alarm, education (call light information, asking for help), fall mat, high/low bed, and proper footwear applied with interventions indicated as somewhat effective; -Falls prevention plan noted as already in place and still ongoing and that care plan would be updated as needed; -Staff contacted the resident's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) regarding the resident and whether he/she could think of additional information to help the resident remain seated or remember to ask for help, and the DPOA said he/she was comfortable with the care the resident received; -Care plan updated is marked as Yes on report. During an interview on 5/24/21 at 5:31 P.M., the resident said he/she fell recently trying to get out of bed to shut gates. (The resident showed an injury that was scabbed over on his/her right lower leg.) Review of the resident's Fall Report, dated 5/24/21, showed the following: -The resident had an unwitnessed fall on 5/24/21 at 9:46 P.M.; -The resident slid out of the wheelchair onto the fall mat located near the bed in the resident's room; -Staff noted the resident was attempting to self-transfer and stand by himself/herself. The resident had removed the seat belt prior to the fall. The resident verbalized he/she should have called for help but did not; -No resident injury noted from this fall; -No planned systemic interventions/changes were noted. During an interview on 5/25/21 at 9:37 A.M., the resident said the following: -He/She fell the previous night trying to shut off the nebulizer located in his/her room; -Staff turned the nebulizer on and then left; -He/She got tired of hearing the nebulizer so he/she tried to get out of his/her chair to shut it off. Review of the resident'[
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship program as a part of their infection prevention and control program that included antibiotic use protocol...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an antibiotic stewardship program as a part of their infection prevention and control program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Policy, revised December 2016, showed the following: -Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program and in conjunction with the facility's general policy for Medication Utilization and Prescribing; -Appropriate indications for use of antibiotics include criteria met for clinical definition of active or suspected sepsis, and pathogen susceptibility, based on culture and sensitivity, to antimicrobial (or therapy begun while culture is pending); -Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility wide antibiotic stewardship; -The infection preventionist (IP) or designee will review antibiotic utilization as part of the antibiotic stewardship program and identify specific situations that are not consistent with the use of antibiotics; -Therapy may require further review and possible changes if the organism is not susceptible to the antibiotic chosen, therapy was started awaiting culture, but culture results and clinical findings do not indicate continued need for antibiotics; -All resident antibiotic regimens will be documented and the information gathered will include the resident's name and medical number, unit and room number, date symptoms appeared, name of antibiotic, start date of antibiotic, pathogen identified, site of infection, date of culture, stop date, total days of therapy, outcome, and adverse events; -The facility will educate and train staff and practitioners about the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program, including appropriate prescribing, monitoring, and surveillance of antibiotic use and outcomes. 1. Review of the antibiotics medication report from 5/1/21 through 5/25/21, provided by the facility, showed 17 antibiotics had been prescribed for residents in the facility during that time frame. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 1:39 P.M., the director of nursing (DON) said he/she posted a list of residents' names who were on antibiotics on a dry erase board in a location where staff could visualize. The DON was working on a process to track infections and antibiotic use in the facility. Currently, there was no documentation of infection or antibiotic surveillance being done in the facility. Department heads held a weekly meeting and discussed infections and antibiotic use in the facility. Nursing staff had access to McGeer's criteria (criteria that must be present to define an infection) on the computer-based system. The DON did not think there were any written policies on antibiotic use and infection surveillance in the facility. The IP's were the DON, the MDS Coordinator and Care Plan Coordinator. None of the IP's had completed the Infection Preventionist training. During an interview on 6/7/21 at 11:18 A.M., the administrator said he expected an antibiotic stewardship program to be a part of the facility's infection prevention and control program, and the DON would keep documentation to show antibiotic use in the facility was being monitored.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0838 (Tag F0838)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for residents competently during both ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility census was 36. Review of the facility's Daily Census Report, dated 5/24/21, showed the facility census was 36. During an interview on 5/27/21 at 9:28 A.M., the administrator said the facility did not develop a facility assessment. The administrator said he/she was not aware a facility assessment was required.
Apr 2019 6 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of Resident #14's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Severely impaired cognition; -Physical behavioral s...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Review of Resident #14's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Severely impaired cognition; -Physical behavioral symptoms occurred one to three days; -Other behavioral symptoms occurred four to six days but less than daily; -Behaviors were worse than previous assessment; -Required extensive assistance from one staff for bed mobility (changing position), dressing, toilet use, and transfers; -Did not have pain; -On scheduled pain medications; -Received PRN pain medications. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 2/13/19, showed the following: -Diagnoses included flaccid hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) affecting left non-dominant side with pain in left shoulder, right elbow, right wrist, joints of right hand; chronic pain; diabetes mellitus Type II; and Parkinson's disease; -The resident recently started yelling out with no words, just yelling; -Staff observed the resident smacking himself/herself in the face, stomach, and legs; -His/her yelling seems to lessen while in bed and staff should offer to put the resident in bed after meals and activities; -Limited in ability to transfer himself/herself related to left sided weakness; -Recently had a stroke that caused left sided flaccidity and staff to transfer with mechanical lift; -Stroke caused left sided weakness as well as bowel and bladder incontinence. (The resident's care plan did not address assessing pain and interventions for pain.) Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff completed a comprehensive pain assessment for the resident. Review of the resident's physician's orders for March 2019 showed the following: -Butrans Schedule III narcotic patch (used to treat moderate to severe chronic pain that is not controlled by other medications) weekly, 5 microgram per hour, one transdermal (medication absorbed slowly through the skin) for chronic pain; -Tylenol extended release 650 mg four times a day PRN (originally ordered on 5/1/18). Review of the resident's Medications Flow sheet, dated March 2019, showed to apply one Butrans transdermal patch every week on Wednesday. Review of the resident's PRN Medications Notes, dated 3/8/19 at 8:00 A.M., showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg upon the resident's request. Staff did not document they assessed the location of the resident's pain, the severity, or the effectiveness of the medication. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/12/19 at 7:00 A.M. and 12:00 noon, showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg upon the resident's request and documented the Tylenol helped. Staff did not document they assessed the location of the pain or the severity of the resident's pain. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/14/19 at 8:00 A.M. and 12:00 noon, showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg and documented the resident complained of pain and the result was the Tylenol medication helped. Staff did not document they assessed the location and severity of the resident's pain. At 7:00 P.M., staff administered Tylenol 650 mg for complaints of ankle pain and documented the result as the resident was resting. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes dated 3/15/19 at 12:00 noon, showed the staff administered Tylenol 650 mg when the resident requested the medication. Staff did not document they assessed the location of the resident's pain, the severity of pain, or the effectiveness of the medication. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/16/19 at 8:00 A.M., showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg for resident's complaint of pain. The result was the resident was resting. Staff did not document they assessed the location of the residents pain or the severity. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/17/19 at 8:00 A.M., showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg for the resident's complaint of pain. The result was the resident was resting. Staff did not document the location of the resident's pain or the severity. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/18/19 at 8:00 A.M., showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg for the resident's complaint of pain. The result was the medication helped the resident. At 12:00 noon, staff administered Tylenol 650 mg for the resident's complaint of pain. The result was the resident was resting. Staff did not document the location of the resident's pain or the severity. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/20/19 at 8:00 A.M. and 12:00 noon, showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg for the resident's complaint of pain. The result was the Tylenol medication helped the resident. Staff did not document the location of the resident's pain or the severity of his/her pain. Review of the resident's PRN Medications Flow sheet, dated 3/21/19, showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg. (There was no place on the flow sheet to write the time the medication was given, and no place for staff to document their assessment of the resident's pain.) Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes showed no documentation staff administered Tylenol 650 mg to the resident on 3/21/19. Staff did not document they assessed the location of the resident's pain, the severity, or the effectiveness of the medication. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/22/19 at 12:00 noon, showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg for the resident's complaint of pain. The result was the resident was resting. Staff did not document the location of the resident's pain or the severity. Review of the resident's PRN Medications Flow sheet, dated 3/25/19, showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg two times to the resident (no times documented). Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes showed there was no documentation staff administered Tylenol 650 mg to the resident on 3/25/19. Staff did not document they assessed the location of the resident's pain, the severity, or the result of the Tylenol medication. Review of the resident's PRN Medications Flow sheet, dated 3/26/19, showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg to the resident. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/26/19 at 8:00 A.M., showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg when resident requested the medication. Staff did not document they assessed the location of the resident's pain, the severity, or the result of the Tylenol medication. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/27/19 at 8:00 A.M. and 12:00 noon, showed staff documented the resident requested the Tylenol 650 mg and the result was the Tylenol medication helped for the 8:00 A.M. dose and the resident rested for the 12:00 noon dose. Staff did not document they assessed the location and severity of the resident's pain. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/28/19 at 8:00 A.M., showed staff documented the resident requested the Tylenol 650 mg and the result was the Tylenol medication helped. Staff did not document they assessed the location and severity of the resident's pain. Review of the resident's PRN Medications Flow sheet, dated 3/29/19, showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg to the resident. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/29/19 at 12:00 noon, showed staff documented the resident was yelling. Staff did not document they assessed the resident for pain, the location and severity of pain, and the result of administering the Tylenol 650 mg. Review of the resident's PRN Medications Flow sheet, dated 3/30/19, showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg to the resident. Review of the resident's PRN Medication Notes, dated 3/30/19 at 8:00 A.M., showed staff documented the resident requested the Tylenol 650 mg and the result was the Tylenol medication helped. Staff did not document they assessed the location and severity of the resident's pain. At 12:00 noon, the resident requested Tylenol 650 mg for complaint of pain. The result was sleeping. Staff did not document they assessed the location and severity of the pain. Observation on 4/3/19 at 6:06 A.M. showed CNA C entered the resident's room and told the resident it was time to get up for breakfast. The resident moaned, shook his/her head no. The resident said he/she didn't want to get up, and didn't want breakfast. The resident said he/she didn't feel well and didn't sleep well. CNA C told the resident everything would be okay. The resident continued to moan and grimace as staff attached the lift sling to the mechanical lift. The resident yelled out, Oh, oh! He/she grimaced, his/her eyebrows were furrowed, his/her mouth was clenched and his/her eyes were closed as CNA E and CNA C transferred the resident from the bed to the wheelchair. The resident's extremities were stiff. The resident said, I hurt all over. When staff moved the resident's left limp foot on to the foot pedal on his/her wheelchair, the resident closed his/her eyes, furrowed his/her brow, and yelled, Oh, oh! Staff washed the resident's face, brushed his/her hair, and pushed the resident to the nurse's station to wait for breakfast. During interview on 4/4/19 at 12:45 P.M., CNA E said he/she assumes the resident Hollers to be hollering. The resident sometimes says he/she is hurting when he/she is hollering. The resident gets scheduled pain medication in the morning so he/she did not tell the charge nurse the resident was in pain yesterday morning (4/3/19) when they got the resident out of bed. CNA E did not know if the resident got any pain medication. During interview on 4/9/19 at 11:50 A.M., CNA C said the resident was with it and could carry a conversation with others. The resident had pain all the time especially when staff provided care. The resident had a lot of pain when getting out of bed. The resident usually had pain in his/her arm and foot. The resident hollers all the time. Staff do not turn the resident routinely every night, so his/her back and legs hurt. The resident has told him/her the night shift staff put him/her to bed and leave him/her that way all night. They probably should have left the resident in bed when the resident said he/she did not want to get up or eat breakfast. Staff tell the charge nurse when the resident is having pain. CNA C was unaware if the resident had any pain medication or was given any pain medication after they got the resident out of bed. During interview on 4/3/19 at 7:10 A.M., the resident, who sat in the wheelchair at the dining room table, said the pain was better now, but he/she still hurt all over. It was like someone sticking needles in me. He/she rated his/her pain as a 6 or 7 (on a pain scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most pain). Review of the resident's PRN Medications Flow sheet, showed on 4/3/19 at 8:00 A.M., showed staff administered Tylenol 650 mg for complaints of pain and documented the resident's pain was rated an 8 which was severe pain. Staff documented the medication helped. Observation on 4/3/19 at 8:10 A.M., showed CNA K took the resident to his/her room. The resident moaned and said, My back hurts. He/she put his/her hand behind his/her back to rub it. CNA K went to check with the nurse for something for the resident's pain. The resident said an occasional oh, oh as he/she sat in the wheelchair. During interview on 4/3/19 at 8:11 A.M., CNA K said he/she asked the CMT D who said he/she just gave Tylenol to the resident (within the past half hour.) Observation on 4/3/19 at 8:20 A.M. showed the resident occasionally said, Oh, oh which could be heard in the hallway. During interview on 4/3/19 at 8:20 A.M., the resident, who sat in the wheelchair in the room, said his/her pain was a6 in his/her back. He/she said sometimes Tylenol worked to relieve pain. During interview on 4/3/19 at 1:20 P.M., the resident, who was in bed, said the pain in his/her back was a little better. The resident said his/her pain was a 6. Observation on 4/4/19 at 7:14 A.M., showed the resident sat at the dining room table waiting for breakfast. The resident rubbed his/her right leg several times as he/she moaned, Oh, oh. During interview on 4/4/19 at 7:40 A.M., CNA F said the resident sometimes says he/she hurts all over. The resident hollered when he/she rolled him/her over in bed this morning to dress him/her. CNA F said he/she told the night charge nurse early this morning but did not know if he/she gave any medication to the resident. CNA F will tell the charge nurse and ask if they can give the resident pain medication. Review of the resident's PRN Medications Flow sheet, showed on 4/4/19 at 8:00 A.M., staff administered Tylenol 650 mg for complaint of pain and documented the resident's pain was a 7 which was severe pain. Staff documented the medication helped. During interview on 4/4/19 at 7:05 P.M., CMT G, night shift staff, said the resident usually said he/she did not have pain but he/she does have pain. The resident has pain in his/her left foot. During interview on 4/4/19 at 7:15 A.M., LPN H said when the resident said Oh, oh, it meant he/she wants peaches to eat, or to lie down, or he/she didn't know why. He/she didn't know if the resident was having pain. If the medication technicians give pain medication, staff was to assess the resident's pain on a scale of 1-10. A long time ago, they had a place in the MAR to chart the pain, but not sure about this now. During interview on 4/3/19 at 12:03 P.M, CMT D said he/she asks a resident on the pain scale of 1 to 10 but did not write it down anywhere since there was no place to write it on Resident #14's MAR. During interview on 4/4/19 at 2:45 P.M., the director of nursing (DON) said the resident knows when he/she is in pain and staff should offer a PRN pain medication to the resident before getting the resident up in the morning. During interview on 4/9/19 at 4:10 P.M., the resident's physician said the resident had PRN Tylenol available for pain. He/she ordered the medication for staff to use as needed. During interview on 4/4/19 at 1:35 P.M., the CMT/MDS Coordinator said when completing the pain assessment on the MDS, he/she marks the resident does not have pain if a resident has not taken PRN pain medications. If the resident received a scheduled pain medication, he/she asks the resident if they have had any pain in the last seven days. If a resident was unable to tell him/her, there were triggers to watch for in the resident and he/she knows to watch and monitor the resident. The medication technicians were to chart on a pain scale when the resident had pain. During interview on 4/17/19 at 10:24 A.M., the CMT/MDS Coordinator said they do not complete comprehensive pain assessments on any residents. During interview on 4/4/19 at 2:33 P.M., the DON said the CNAs were good to report to the charge nurse if a resident had pain. The CMTs were to ask residents if they had pain and offer PRN pain medication to the residents. The charge nurse was to call the physician, even in the night, if the resident had pain and nothing was scheduled for PRN pain medications. It was unacceptable for a resident to be in pain and staff to tell the resident pain medication wasn't due yet. If a scheduled pain medication was not due and the resident was in pain and needed something for pain, the nurse was to call the physician for guidance and pain medication for relief of pain. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pain management program for two residents (Residents #10 and #14), in a review of 12 sampled residents. The facility failed to adequately assess and monitor Resident #10's pain. The resident exhibited pain in the morning hours prior to his/her scheduled pain medication. Staff continued to provide care after the resident continued to express he/she was having intense pain. The facility did not notify the physician of the resident's complaints of pain and did not provide any non-pharmacological interventions to address the resident's pain. The facility failed to adequately assess Resident #14's pain, failed to consistently document the location and severity of the resident's pain when giving PRN pain medication, failed to develop a care plan with interventions to address the resident's pain, failed to ensure the resident's pain medication was effective in treating his/her pain, and failed to provide PRN medications when the resident expressed pain during care. The facility census was 31. 1. Review of the facility policy, Pain Assessment and Management, obtained from the Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual for Long-Term Care, revised March 2015, showed the following: -Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain to a level that is acceptable to the resident and is based on his/her clinical condition and established treatment goals; -A multidisciplinary care process that includes assessing the potential for pain, effectively recognizing the presence of pain, identifying the characteristics of pain, addressing the underlying causes of the pain, developing and implementing approaches to pain management, identifying and using specific strategies for different levels and sources of pain, monitoring for the effectiveness of interventions, and modifying approaches as necessary; -Conduct a comprehensive pain assessment upon admission to the facility, at the quarterly review, whenever there is a significant change in condition, and when there is onset of new pain or worsening of existing pain; -Assess the resident's pain and consequences of pain at least each shift for acute pain or significant changes in levels of chronic pain and at least weekly in stable chronic pain; -Recognizing Pain: observe the resident (during rest and movement) for physiologic and behavioral (non-verbal) signs of pain; -Possible behavioral signs of pain: verbal expressions such as groaning, crying, screaming; facial expressions such as grimacing, frowning, clenching of the jaw, etc; changes in gait, skin color and vital signs; behavior such as resisting care, irritability, depression, decreased participation in usual activities; -Limitations in level of activity due to presence of pain; guarding, rubbing or favoring a particular part of the body; difficulty eating or loss of appetite; insomnia, and evidence of depression, anxiety, fear or hopelessness; -Ask the resident if he/she is experiencing pain. Be aware the resident may avoid the term pain and use words such as throbbing, aching, hurting, cramping, numbness or tingling; -Assessing Pain: during the comprehensive pain assessment, gather information from the resident (or legal representative); -Characteristics of pain: intensity of pain (as measured on a standardized pain scale); descriptors of pain; patter of pain such as constant or intermittent; location and radiation of pain; frequency, timing and duration of pain; factors that precipitate or exacerbate pain; factors and strategies that reduce pain, symptoms that accompany pain such as nausea, anxiety; -Assess pain using a consistent approach and a standardized pain assessment instrument appropriate to the resident's cognitive level; -Discuss with the resident (or legal representative) the goals for pain management and satisfaction with the current level of pain control; -Review the resident's treatment record or recent nurses' notes to identify any situations or interventions where an increase in the resident's pain may be anticipated such as bathing, dressing, or other activities of daily living; treatments such as wound care or dressing changes; ambulation or physical therapy; turning or repositioning; -Defining Goals and Appropriate Interventions: Interventions shall be consistent with the resident's goals for treatment and goals will be specifically defined and documented; shall reflect the sources, type and severity of pain, and shall address the underlying causes of the resident's pain; -Implementing Pain Management Strategies: The physician and staff will establish a treatment regimen based on the resident's medical condition, current medication regimen, nature, severity and cause of the pain, course of the illness, and treatment goals. Implement the medication regimen as ordered, carefully documenting the results of the interventions; -Monitoring and Modifying Approaches: re-assess the resident's pain and consequences of pain at least each shift for acute pain or significant changes in levels of chronic pain and at least weekly in stable chronic pain. Monitor the following factors to determine if the resident's pain is being adequately controlled: the resident's response to interventions and level of comfort over time, the status of the underlying cause(s) of pain, if identified previously, and the presence of adverse consequences to treatment. Monitor the resident by performing a basic assessment with enough detail and, as needed, with standardized assessment tool (e.g. approved pain scales, etc.) and relevant criteria for measuring pain management such as signs and symptoms; -If pain has not been adequately controlled, the multidisciplinary team, including the physician, shall reconsider approaches and make adjustments as indicated; -Documentation: Document the resident's reported level of pain with adequate detail such as enough information to gauge the status of pain and the effectiveness of interventions for pain as necessary. Upon completion of the pain assessment, the person conducting the assessment shall record the information obtained from the assessment in the resident's medical record; -Report the following information to the physician or practitioner: significant changes in the level of the resident's pain; any adverse effects from pain medications; and prolonged, unrelieved pain despite care plan interventions. 2. Review of Resident #10's care plan, last revised on 8/8/18, showed the following: -The resident had complaints of chronic pain related to old vertebra fracture, osteoporosis (a bone disease that causes the bones to become weak and brittle) and bunions. Pain site was at the back of the resident's legs and feet; -The resident's legs are the most painful. The resident's pain was well controlled when handled gently during care and positioned with pillows for support; -The resident liked his/her legs elevated on pillows when in bed. Staff was to report any complaints or signs or symptoms of pain to the charge nurse; -He/she had pain medication he/she could have as needed. He/she did not like to take oral pain medication because of fear of side effects, although staff should still monitor for pain during care and offer medications per orders; -Use non-medicated pain relief measures per treatment administration record (TAR); -Offer and administer pain medication per medication administration record (MAR) -Reinforce that he/she will be monitored for adverse effects, monitor and record effectiveness. Report adverse side affects; -Evaluate effectiveness of pain management interventions. Adjust if ineffective or adverse side effects emerge. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, dated 2/5/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Clear speech; -Makes self-understood and understands others; -Did not reject care; -Required extensive assistance of one staff member with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene and bathing; -No scheduled pain medication; -The resident received as needed (PRN) medication; -No non-medication interventions; -No presence of pain. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff completed a comprehensive pain assessment for the resident. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated February 2019, showed the following: -Diagnoses included chronic pain, unspecified fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra, and abnormal posture; -Acetaminophen (Tylenol; pain reliever) 500 milligrams (mg), one tablet as needed for pain every six hours. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 2/25/19 at 1:45 A.M., showed the resident yelling out for pain, Mama, I'm hurting. Staff asked the resident if he/she would like PRN Tylenol. The resident said, Yes, please. Staff gave PRN Tylenol as ordered. Staff repositioned the resident and applied moon boots to protect his/her heels. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 2/26/19 at 5:27 A.M., showed the resident asked for and received Tylenol for pain all over. The resident was resting at 5:30 AM. Review of the resident's POS, dated March 2019, showed the resident had an order for Tylenol 500 mg every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 3/1/19 at 3:00 A.M., showed the resident asked for and received Tylenol for pain. Pain medication was effective. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 3/4/19 at 4:00 A.M., showed the resident asked for and received Tylenol for pain all over.' Pain medication was effective. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 3/5/19 at 4:15 A.M., showed the resident complained of heel pain. He/she asked for and received Tylenol. Staff also repositioned the resident to take any pressure off his/her feet. Staff documented effective. Will continue to monitor. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 3/8/19 at 2:00 A.M., showed the resident asked for and received a PRN Tylenol for heel pain. He/she was resting with eyes closed at 3:00 A.M. Will continue to monitor. Review of the resident's POS, dated March 2019, showed the following: -On 3/8/19, a new order for Tylenol 325 mg, two tablets (650 mg) three times a day at 8:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., and 6:00 P.M. -On 3/8/19, an order to discontinue Tylenol 500 mg every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the resident's nurse's notes showed no documentation to show the reason the resident's Tylenol 500 mg PRN was discontinued and a new order was obtained for scheduled Tylenol 325 mg, two tablets three times a day. Review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 3/9/19 at 4:00 A.M., showed the resident asked for and received PRN Tylenol for pain. Staff documented it was effective. (Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident's PRN Tylenol was discontinued on 3/8/19.) Review of the resident's physician order sheets (POS), dated April 2019, showed the following: -On 3/11/19, an order to discontinue Tylenol 325 mg, two tablets (650 mg) three times a day at 8:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., and 6:00 P.M. -On 3/11/19, a new order for Tylenol 325 mg four times daily at 8:00 A.M., 12:00 P.M., 4:00 P.M. and 8:00 P.M. for chronic pain. (The resident did not have an order for PRN pain medication.) Review of the resident's nurse's notes showed no documentation to show the reason the resident's pain medications were changed on 3/11/19. Observation on 4/3/19 at approximately 6:30 A.M., showed the following: -The resident lay in bed in a dark room and yelled out, Oh my feet are killing me! Help me, I hurt so bad! -The resident had facial grimacing; -Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) J entered the resident's room, lifted the resident's feet and asked the resident what was wrong. The resident immediately cried out, That hurts! My feet are killing me! Help me! -CNA J walked out of the resident's room into the hall and reported the pain to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I. LPN I said the resident could not have anything for pain until 8:00 A.M. CNA J went back into the resident's room and explained to the resident he/she could not have anything for pain now; -CNA C and CNA E walked into the resident's room to assist the resident out of bed. The resident continued to scream, I need something for pain! My feet are killing me! Oh momma, help me please! CNA C said the resident was really hurting today; -CNA C and CNA E transferred the resident with the mechanical lift to his/her wheelchair. The resident continued to cry out in pain; -The resident exhibited facial grimacing; -Staff pushed the resident in his/her wheelchair to the dayroom and placed him/her in front of the television. Observation on 4/3/19 at 6:44 A.M., showed CNA C reported to LPN J the resident was screaming out in pain today and needed something. LPN J responded the resident was on scheduled medication and could not have anything until 8:00 A.M. LPN J said he/she had directed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) D to give the resident something for pain as soon as the resident was scheduled to have it. Observation on 4/3/19 at 7:00 A.M., showed the resident sat in the dayroom. The resident exhibited facial grimacing. Observation on 4/3/19 at 7:31 A.M., showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in the day room and said, I hurt! My feet are killing me! The resident exhibited facial grimacing and furrowed brow. Observation on 4/3/19 at 7:46 A.M., showed the resident sat at the table. The resident exhibited a furrowed brow and groaned, Oh, oh. During interview on 4/3/19 at 7:50 A.M., CMT D said the resident was in pain a lot before his/her scheduled Tylenol was due. The resident cried out in pain but did not have a PRN pain medication available anymore, and there was nothing he/she could do for the resident. He/she had passed his/her concern regarding the resident's uncontrolled pain to the charge nurse and nothing was done. He/she felt the resident waited so long for staff to give him/her something for pain that the resident became upset and often refused when staff finally got around to giving the resident something for pain. He/she attempted to administer the Tylenol around 7:30 A.M. this morning and the resident refused. During interview on 4/3/19 at 10:50 A.M., the resident said the following: -The staff at the facility talked down to him/her and didn't listen when he/she complained of being in pain; -He/she was in so much pain this morning when staff got him/her up. The level of pain he/she was in was the highest number possible on a pain scale; -The staff at the facility did not think his/her complaint (of pain) was justified. It was his/her body and he/she knew when he/she was in pain; -He/she was in an accident years ago and he/she had pain in his/her legs and feet all the time; -He/she would like to have called the physician himself/herself when he/she was in so much pain and staff did nothing; -The staff just said he/she couldn't have anything for pain yet; -He/she was in so much pain he/she did not have good sense. Staff did not take him/her seriously. He/she felt he/she couldn't control himself/herself as he/she hurt so bad, and he/she was out of sorts; -The pain affected his/her sleep and appetite; -He/she was educated and the staff acted like he/she didn't know anything; -When staff finally got around to giving him/her something, I thought heck with you, you made me wait so long, I won't take it now. I was so mad they wouldn't give it to me when I needed it. When I needed it, they didn't take me serious. During interview on 4/3/19 at 9:24 A.M., CNA E said the following: -The resident cried and hollered out in pain frequently; -Today was a bad day for the resident, as he/she had a lot of pain this morning; -When the CNAs reported the resident's pain, the charge nurse said the resident's [TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatment and care to two residents (Re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatment and care to two residents (Residents #2 and #12), in a review of 12 sample residents, in accordance with their identified care needs. The facility failed to ensure a system was in place to consistently monitor wounds for improvement or decline, failed to develop a care plan consistent with the resident's condition with interventions to address the resident's wounds, failed to notify the physician of newly developed blisters, and failed to clarify and obtain an order to cleanse a wound. The facility census was 31. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Wound Care, dated 2001 and revised October 2010, showed the following: -The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing: -Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure; -Remove dressing; -Wash tissue around the wound that is usually covered by the dressing, tape or gauze with antiseptic or soap and water; -Dress wound; -Documentation: the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1. The type of wound care given; 2. The date and time the wound care was given; 3. The position in which the resident was placed; 4. The name and title of the individual performing the wound care; 5. Any change in the resident's condition; 6. All assessment data (i.e., wound bed color, size, drainage, etc.) obtained when inspecting the wound. 2. Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff, dated 12/26/18, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -The resident was independent for transfers, toileting and personal hygiene; -Continent of bowel and bladder. -Not at risk for pressure ulcers; -No current pressure ulcers or skin issues. Review of nurses' notes showed on 3/14/19 at 11:40 A.M., the resident was incontinent of urine. The resident's skin was red in his/her peri-anal area with small excoriations on his/her inner buttocks. The resident's physician was notified and a new order was received for Nystatin cream (antifungal cream) as needed. Review of the nurses' notes dated 3/21/19 at 7:42 A.M., showed the resident requires assist of one with all ambulation, transfers and activities of daily living (ADLs). Excoriations noted on the resident's inner buttocks are wider. Current treatment is Nystatin cream (antifungal cream). Notified physician of change in excoriations. Review of the resident's chemotherapy physician's progress note, dated 3/22/19, showed a decubitus ulcer (injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) on the resident's sacrum (triangular bone at the base of the spin; tailbone). Mepilex border (a bordered foam dressing) to sacrum. Change every three days or as needed. Hold chemotherapy for two weeks. Review of the resident's POS, dated March 2019, showed the following: -Diagnoses included non-pressure chronic ulcer of skin; -On 3/22/19, an order for Mepilex border, change every three days or as needed to sacral ulcer. Review of the resident's care plan showed no documentation the resident had a wound on his/her sacrum or any other skin issues. The resident's care plan did not include interventions to address the wound on the resident's skin. Review of the resident's nurses' notes, dated 3/24/19 at 9:04 A.M., showed staff completed a skin assessment. Staff noted five open lesions on the resident's sacrum measuring 0.2 centimeter (cm) in diameter and 0.2 cm depth with current treatment of Mepilex change every three days and as needed (PRN) until healed. Review of the resident's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Required limited assistance of two staff for transfers; -Required limited assistance of one staff for toileting and personal hygiene; -Occasionally incontinent of bladder; -Not at risk for pressure ulcers; -No current pressure ulcers or skin issues; -Had no pressure relieving devices for chair or bed. During an interview on 4/2/19 at 1:25 P.M., the resident said he/she got a sore bottom from sitting in his/her recliner so he/she doesn't sit in it much now. He/she said there was a bandage on his/her bottom and it was feeling better. Observation on 4/3/19 at 8:44 A.M., showed the following: -The resident lay on his/her back in bed; -Registered Nurse (RN) A entered the resident's room and laid out the dressing supplies on the bedside table; -RN A removed the old border gauze dressing showing a small amount of yellowish drainage; -RN A wiped the open areas, one on the resident's right buttock and one on the resident's left buttock, with a skin prep pad; -RN A then applied a clean border gauze dressing to the area; -RN A did not measure the open areas on the resident's buttocks. Review of nurses notes, dated 4/3/19 at 9:54 A.M., showed an open lesion on the resident's left buttock measuring approximately 0.3 cm in diameter with 0.1 cm depth. And open lesion on the resident's right buttock measuring approximately 0.3 cm in diameter and 0.1 cm depth with scant serosanguinous (yellowish fluid with small amounts of blood) drainage. Both lesions cleansed with skin prep (liquid film-forming dressing that forms a protective film to help reduce friction during removal of tapes and films) and Mepilex dressing applied. During interview on 4/3/19 at 1:00 P.M., RN A said he/she obtained the measurements of the resident's open areas on his/her buttocks by visually looking at them. He/she did not measure them with a measuring tool. Observation on 4/4/19 at 10:44 A.M., showed the following: -The resident sat in the shower chair in the shower room; -Staff assisted the resident to stand from of the shower chair; -RN A picked up a clear plastic measuring tool and held the tool approximately an inch away from the resident's left buttock and measured the resident's open area on his/her left buttock at 0.5 cm with a depth of 0.25 cm; -RN A held the clear plastic measuring tool up to the resident's right buttock (approximately an inch away) and measured the area at 1 cm by 1 cm with no depth (top layer of skin was absent on both open areas). During interview on 4/4/19 at 10:58 A.M., RN A said staff do not always measure wounds weekly. He/she felt the resident's wounds were more of an abrasion than a decubitus ulcer. He/she said the facility does not have any residents with decubitus ulcers. He/she said there is no wound nurse and whoever happens to be the charge nurse for the day measured the wound and documented the wounds progress in the nurses' notes. If staff wanted a more detailed measurement of the wounds, then staff should probably use a measuring tool. If staff did not want a detailed assessment, then staff probably did not need to use a measuring tool. He/she felt the measurements were better today than yesterday. Skin prep is what they used to clean wounds. The wound treatment order did not say to use skin prep to cleanse the wound. He/she should have notified the physician to clarify the orders. During interview on 4/4/19 at 1:36 P.M., the Certified Medication Technician (CMT)/MDS Coordinator said the following: -He/she thought Resident #2 had a shear on his/her sacrum and does not think the resident had any pressure relieving devices; -He/she was aware the resident's chemotherapy physician had documented the resident had a decubitus ulcer on his/her sacrum. During interview on 4/4/19 at 2:20 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said she was not aware of Resident #2's wounds until yesterday (4/3/19). During interview on 4/17/19 at 2:45 P.M., the DON said he/she has not assessed the wounds on the resident's buttocks. If staff have concerns, then she would assess the area. During interview on 4/9/19 at 4:10 P.M., the resident's physician said he thought Resident #2's wound was due to moisture association not a pressure. He would expect staff to clean a wound with soap and water. 5. Review of the Resident #12's care plan for pressure ulcer, last reviewed/revised on 7/18/19, showed to inspect the resident's skin during care and report any redness or breakdown. Review of the resident's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Long-term and short-term memory problem; -Totally dependent on one staff member with personal hygiene and bathing; -No current pressure ulcers or skin conditions. Review of the resident's nurse's note, dated 4/1/19 at 5:33 A.M., showed while getting the resident up, staff identified blisters on both of the resident's breast about where his/her undershirt would possibly rub. Staff was instructed not to put an undershirt on the resident at this time. (There was no evidence staff notified the resident's physician of the blisters.) During interview on 4/5/19 at 9:30 A.M., LPN I, night shift charge nurse, said he/she told RN A in report after his/her shift on 4/1/19 about the resident's blisters. He/she told RN A because the blisters were not an emergency and he/she did not want to bother the physician on the night shift. During interview on 4/4/19 at 12:40 P.M., RN A said he/she was aware the resident had a blister on each side of his/her chest. The blisters were due to the resident's undershirts being too tight. The undershirts had rubbed the skin. He/she would not bother the physician with notification of something like a blister. He/she did not measure areas like that. He/she or CMT/MDS Coordinator documented skin issues in the medical record. The nurses depended on the CNAs to report a change or concern in areas such as a blister. The nurses didn't necessarily look at the areas daily or each shift. The nurses completed skin assessments quarterly and PRN if a concern came up. If a specific treatment was ordered, a nurse would see the area when the nurse provided the treatment. Review of the resident's medical record showed no documentation of the blisters on 4/2/19. Observation on 4/3/19 at 5:10 A.M., showed Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) J removed the resident's shirt and noted a circular blister filled area on the resident's left outer chest. Staff noted a circular blister filled area with some mild erythema (skin redness) around the area on the resident's right outer breast area. LPN I entered the resident's room and said the resident's physician wanted to keep the areas on the resident's chest open to air to dry up and no treatment was ordered. (There was no evidence the resident's physician had been notified of the blisters on the resident's chest.) Observation on 4/4/19 at approximately 12:45 P.M., showed the following: -The resident lay in bed; -RN A took a clear plastic measuring device and held away approximately 1.5 inches from the resident's right chest area and said the resident had a round 1 cm area where blister area had been and a scar surrounded the area; -RN A took a clear plastic measuring device and held away approximately 1.5 inches from the resident's left chest area and said the resident had a 0.5 cm round blister area. Record review of the resident's nurse's notes, dated 4/4/19 at 12:50 P.M., showed staff documented the measurements of the blisters. Left breast, fluid filled blister 0.5 cm. Right breast area, brown scabbed lesion 1.0 cm. Determined from small underclothing rubbed and causing blister and brown scab. Physician notified and received an order for Band-Aid and Vaseline. Change daily and as needed (PRN) until healed. Observation on 4/4/19 at approximately 1:30 P.M. showed the following: -The resident lay in bed; -The DON pulled the resident's shirt back to expose the resident's chest area to complete a skin assessment; -The DON said the resident had a blister on his/her left chest area and the right chest had an area where a blister had previously been. The skin surrounding the area was pink in color, but he/she would not describe this area as a scar. During interview on 4/4/19 at 2:20 P.M., the DON said the physician was notified of the blisters on Resident #12. The charge nurse should know to pass areas such as blisters on in report and assess each shift, but the staff would not necessarily document the areas were assessed. Nursing staff were monitoring the areas. During interview on 4/9/19 at 4:10 P.M., the resident's physician said the following: -He was not aware of the blister areas on Resident #12 until after the recent survey, and would have expected staff to have notified him of the areas; -He expected the facility staff to notify him of any open areas, assess the areas and measure those areas so he knew exactly how an area stood; -The facility could fax him an assessment and plan and he could sign an order but he wanted to be notified of any skin issues; -A simple area can turn into something such as a pressure area so he wanted to know early so he could delve right into the issue. 6. During interviews on 4/3/19 at 12:15 P.M. and on 4/4/19 at 1:36 P.M., CMT/MDS Coordinator said the following: -If a CNA sees a new skin area, then the CNA should report it to the charge nurse. The charge nurse should measure it and document in the resident's progress notes; -When there was a wound, the charge nurse doesn't necessarily measure the wound but will check this wound daily and start treatment if ordered; -The charge nurse doesn't measure wounds unless it was from pressure or it looked real bad. The charge nurse was to use common sense. -If the wound is stageable, then the wound would be classified as bad and then staff would have the wound clinic come to see the resident; -The facility does not have a wound nurse. The nurses do the skin assessments on residents; -The nurses also complete quarterly skin assessments; -The CNAs fill out a skin assessment during a resident's shower if they find something and that assessment goes to the DON and then on to him/her. 8. During interview on 4/4/19 at 2:20 P.M., the DON said the following: -The staff only measured skin issues that were deep. Staff did not measure blisters, bruises or skin tears; -The charge nurse completed skin assessments on admission, quarterly or if the physician has an ordered treatment; -The charge nurse should assess the wound and document in the progress note; -Staff should use the clear plastic measurement tools to measure wounds. She would not expect staff to measure wounds visually; -If a wound has changed or is a concern, then staff should call the physician; -She expected staff to cleanse a wound prior to applying a new dressing and if the treatment order does not specify how to cleanse the wound, then staff should call the physician to clarify the order; -Staff should not be using skin prep to clean a wound.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents #12 and #14), in a re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents #12 and #14), in a review of 12 sampled residents, and two additional residents (Resident #3 and #5), the right to choose schedules (including sleeping and waking times) and make choices about aspects of their lives in the facility that were significant to them. The facility census was 31. 1. Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, from the Nursing Services Policy and Procedure manual for Long-Term Care, revised December 2016, showed the following: -Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity; -Basic rights included a dignified existence and self-determination. 2. Review of a laminated form, located at the nurse's station, showed the following: -Night shift gets up the residents listed below; -The list contained 12 residents which included Residents #3, #5, and #12; -NO ONE LEAVES until ALL these residents are up! -Use good common sense, if they want to sleep in, let them. If they want to get up, get them up even if they are not on the list; -Beds are to be made, hair combed, oral care done, wash face and perineal care done. 3. Review of a laminated form, located at the nurse's station, showed the following: -Day shift gets up the residents listed below; -The list contained 16 residents, which included Resident #14; -Beds are to be made, hair combed, oral care done, wash face and perineal care done. 4. Review of Resident #3's Data Collection form, dated 9/14/10, showed the resident's usual rising time varied. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by the facility staff, dated 4/2/19, showed the following: -Long-term and short-term memory problem; -Daily decision making skills were severely impaired; -Felt tired or had little energy nearly every day; -Required extensive assistance from two staff members to transfer; -Required extensive assistance of one staff member with dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the resident's care plan, last reviewed 3/22/19, showed the following: -The resident had dementia that caused confusion and poor recall; -Reorient the resident throughout the day. Try to maintain a consistent schedule. Allow him/her to communicate needs. If he/she had difficulty, ask yes and no questions, the resident became anxious at times; -Explain steps of care and do not rush; -The resident used a mechanical lift for transfers and two staff assist. He/she becomes anxious with personal care. Explain each step and don't rush; -The resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder. (The resident's care plan did not address the resident's preference for waking hours) Observation on 4/3/19 at 5:08 A.M. showed the following: -The resident lay in bed fully dressed; -Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) O pulled the mechanical lift sling into place under the resident, pulled the resident's blankets back over the resident and told the resident he/she would be back to get the resident up when he/she had help; -CNA O turned off the light in the room and walked down the hall to Resident #12's room. 5. Review of Resident #12's Resident Data Collection form, dated 4/9/17, showed the resident's usual arising time was left blank. Review of the resident's significant change MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Long-term and short-term memory problem; -Daily decision making skills were severely impaired; -Felt tired or had little energy nearly every day; -Required extensive assistance from two staff members with transfers; -Totally dependent on one staff member with dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene; -Occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder; -On hospice care. Review of the resident's care plan regarding communication and activities of daily living (ADLs), last reviewed on 7/18/19, showed the following: -The resident was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and grooming. The resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder; -The resident had advanced dementia. He/she had become less verbal as the disease progressed. When speaking to him/her, make sure you have his/her full attention. If he/she appears to have difficulty understanding/comprehending, be sure to speak clearly and ask simple questions requiring yes or no answers. (The resident's care plan did not address the resident's preference for waking hours) Observation on 4/3/19 at 5:10 A.M., showed the following: -The resident lay in bed. The light in the room was off; -CNA O and CNA J knocked on the resident's door, entered the resident's room and turned on the light; -CNA O told the resident good morning and it was time to get up for breakfast; -The resident's eyes were closed. CNA O said the resident's name and said it was time to get up; -CNA O and CNA J entered the resident's bathroom, washed hands, and applied gloves; -CNA J walked up to the resident's bed and said, Good morning. The resident slowly opened his/her eyes; -CNA J washed the resident's face, hands, neck and washed under both of the resident's arms; -CNA J applied lotion to the resident's skin; -CNA J and CNA O provided the resident with perineal care, dressed the resident and used the mechanical lift to transfer the resident to his/her wheelchair; -CNA O pushed the resident in his/her wheelchair to the dayroom in front of the television. Observation on 4/3/19 at 5:45 A.M. showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in the dayroom with his/her eyes closed. Observation on 4/3/19 at 6:25 A.M. showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in the dayroom with with his/her eyes closed. During interview on 4/04/19 6:50 A.M., CNA O said the following: -He/she started getting residents up at 5:00 A.M. and followed the get up list at the desk. The residents he/she got up were the residents who required assistance from two staff and were not real cognitive; -The day shift was shorter on staff so the night shift staff tried to get up all the residents who required two staff to transfer and residents who used lifts to transfer; -The residents needed to be up by 7:00 A.M. for breakfast -He/she woke the residents up, dressed them and placed a mechanical lift sling under each of the residents. He/she went back into these residents' room when the day shift staff came in and started getting each of these residents up for the day; -Resident #12 was on the list of residents to wake up and staff woke the resident up each morning; -Resident #5 was also on the get up list for night shift. During interview on 4/4/19 6:53 A.M., CNA L said the night shift staff pre-dressed residents that required two staff assistance. Staff placed the residents on a lift sling. When day shift came into work, the staff would get each of those residents up. 6. Review of Resident #14's re-admission Resident-Data Collection form, dated 5/14/18, showed the resident's arising time was left blank. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 2/14/18, showed the following: -Resident was limited in ability to transfer himself/herself related to left-sided weakness; -The resident recently had a stroke that caused left sided flaccidity. The staff was to transfer the resident using a mechanical lift; -Staff to offer assistance with ADLs including morning cares, bed mobility, and transfers. (The care plan did not address the resident's preference for waking hours) Review of the resident's annual MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Severely impaired cognition; -Required extensive assistance from one staff for dressing and transfers. Observation on 04/03/19 at 6:06 A.M. showed CNA C entered the resident's room and told the resident it was time to get up for breakfast. The resident moaned, shook his/her head no, and told the staff he/she didn't want to get up, and didn't want breakfast. The resident said he/she didn't feel well and didn't sleep well. CNA C told the resident everything would be okay. The resident kept moaning and grimacing, as CNA C and CNA E attached the lift sling to the mechanical lift. The resident yelled out, Oh, oh! Staff transferred the resident from the bed to the wheelchair with the mechanical lift. CNA E pushed the resident to the nurse's station to wait to go to breakfast in the dining room. During interview on 4/4/19 at 12:42 P.M., CNA E said the resident had a right to stay in bed yesterday (4/3/19). When the resident said he/she did not want to get up or eat breakfast, staff could have gone back later to assist the resident. During interview on 4/9/19 at 11:50 A.M., CNA C said they probably should have left the resident in bed when the resident said he/she did not want to get up or eat breakfast. 7. Review of Resident #5's Resident Data Collection form, dated 4/18/16, showed the resident's usual arising time was 6:30 A.M. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed the following: -Cognition was intact; -Felt tired or had little energy two to six days of seven days; -Independent with bed mobility (turning in bed), transfers, and walked in the room; -Limited assistance of one staff for dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 3/22/19, showed the following: -The resident was up ad lib with ambulation throughout the nursing home. At times, the resident would propel himself/herself in the wheelchair; -Staff was to provide set up assistance with morning cares. The resident dressed himself/herself but required set up assistance and help with stockings. (The care plan did not address the resident's preference for waking hours). Observation on 4/3/19 at 7:15 A.M., showed the resident sat in the wheelchair in the dining room waiting for breakfast. During a group interview on 4/3/19 at 9:15 A.M., the resident said he/she did not like it when the staff woke him/her up early in the morning. Staff had to help assist him/her with morning cares since breakfast was served at 7:00 A.M. in the dining room. Observation on 4/4/19 at 7:20 A.M., showed the resident sat in his/her wheelchair in the dining room waiting for his/her breakfast. During interview on 04/04/19 at 8:05 A.M., the resident said staff woke him/her in the morning. He/she was not sure what time staff woke him/her. He/she was usually sound asleep when staff came into the room in the morning to wake him/her. Breakfast was served at a certain time and he/she went to the dining room. Staff helped to dress him/her and he/she was not able to walk without help. At home, he/she didn't get up early. He/she thought they had to follow the routines here at the nursing home. 8. During interview on 4/4/19 at 7:05 A.M., CNA G (night aide) said there was a list of residents the day shift and night shift staff were to get up, but staff didn't always go by the list. During interview on 4/4/19 at 12:42 P.M., CNA E said staff did have a list of residents to get up but he/she was not sure about the list now. Staff try to have all residents up by 7:00 A.M. for breakfast. During interview on 4/9/19 at 11:50 A.M., CNA C said the night shift staff has a list of residents to get up before they leave to go home. The CNAs on the day shift get the residents up. CNA C said he/she wakes residents to ask them if they want to get up. He/she enters the room and says good morning. Staff can leave the residents in bed, but then the charge nurses tell the CNAs they want the residents up and out of bed. Sometimes when the day shift staff come in, the residents are already dressed with a mechanical lift pad underneath them while they are in bed. During interview on 4/4/19 at 7:15 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H, night shift charge nurse, said night shift staff stays until all residents in the building are up. If the residents are dressed, staff should immediately help the residents up. If a resident refused to get up, the staff should go back later and ask. The get up lists for day and night are guidelines, but not set in stone. 9. During interview on 4/4/19 at 2:08 P.M., Certified Medication Technician (CMT)/MDS Coordinator said he/she and the Director of Nurses (DON) asked staff what normal times the residents got up. The DON made a get up list because the night shift and the day shift were complaining about how many residents they were each getting up in the morning for breakfast. Staff does not ask the resident or family what time the resident normally got up. They expect staff to wake residents to get everyone up for breakfast. During interview on 4/4/19 at 2:45 P.M., the DON said she made the day and night shift get up resident lists because staff were fighting over who was to get certain residents up. The residents' preferences to getting up should be in the care plans, but maybe not in every resident's care plan because staff know these residents. If a resident was unable to speak for themselves, staff get them up. She expected staff to get residents up and dressed. Staff should not dress the residents and then leave them in bed on the mechanical lift pad. The charge nurses were to monitor to ensure staff were not dressing residents, placing them on the lift pads, and then keeping the residents in bed until staff came later to get them out of bed. She wants the CNAs to check on the residents and if they are moving around in the bed and their eyes are open, then they can get them up. Not every resident had to be up by 7:00 A.M.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow recipes and the spreadsheet menu when preparing and serving the lunch meal on 4/3/19, to residents on mechanical soft ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow recipes and the spreadsheet menu when preparing and serving the lunch meal on 4/3/19, to residents on mechanical soft and pureed diets. The facility census was 31. 1. Review of the Diet Roster-By Diet, dated 4/3/19, showed 12 residents had a physician's order for a mechanical soft diet and two residents had a physician's order for a pureed diet. 2. Review of the spreadsheet menu for lunch on 4/3/19, showed staff were to serve residents on a mechanical soft diet a #8 serving (1/2 cup) of ground barbeque riblette with sauce. Record review of the recipe for ground barbeque riblette with sauce, showed to place prepared riblettes in a washed and sanitized food processor, grind to the size and texture of fine hamburger. Place in steamtable pans with enough barbeque sauce to keep the product moist. Portion #8 dipper of ground meat onto plate and ladle an additional 2-ounces of sauce over the top. Observation on 4/3/19at 10:23 A.M. showed Dietary Staff B removed ten baked riblettes from a pan and ground them in the food processor. He/she added some barbeque sauce to the food processor and mixed. He/she placed the ground riblettes in a steamtable pan. Observation on 4/3/19 between 11:16 A.M. and 11:50 A.M., during the lunch meal service, showed Dietary Staff B served all residents on a mechanical soft diet a #20 serving (1/5 cup) of ground barbeque riblette instead of a #8 serving (1/2 cup). Dietary Staff B did not serve additional sauce on top of the ground barbeque riblette as directed by the spreadsheet menu. 2. Review of the spreadsheet menu for lunch on 4/3/19, showed staff was to serve residents on a pureed diet the following: -Pureed barbeque riblette, #8 dipper (1/2 cup); -Pureed macaroni and tomatoes, #10 dipper (2/5 cup); -Pureed green beans with onions, #12 dipper (1/3 cup); -Pureed buttered white bread, #20 dipper (1/5 cup). Record review of the recipe for pureed barbeque riblette, showed to serve with hot, prepared barbeque sauce ladled over the top. Observation on 4/3/19 at 10:35 A.M. showed Dietary Staff B placed five riblettes in the blender with chicken broth and water. Dietary Staff B did not add bread to the pureed mixture. Observation on 4/3/19 between 11:16 A.M. and 11:50 A.M., during the lunch meal, showed Dietary Staff B served the following to all three residents on a pureed diet: -A #20 serving (1/5 cup) of pureed barbeque riblette instead of a #8 serving (1/2 cup) as directed, and did not serve sauce on top of the riblette; -A #24 serving (1/6 cup) of pureed macaroni and tomatoes instead of a #10 serving (2/5 cup) as directed; -A #20 serving (1/5 cup) of pureed green beans with onions instead of a #12 serving (1/3 cup) as directed. -Staff did not serve the residents pureed bread as directed on the spreadsheet menu. 3. During an interview on 4/3/19 at 1:10 P.M., the dietary manager said staff was supposed to add one slice of bread to the pureed meat or entrée during puree preparation. Staff should use recipes to know what serving spoons were needed to serve the item. Staff should add sauce should to ground entrées and pureed items when indicated. During an interview on 4/3/19 at 1:20 P.M., Dietary Staff B said he/she was supposed to put bread in the blender when he/she prepared the pureed meat but he/she forgot to add the bread. He/she should use the recipe book to know what scoop sizes to use. Sauce was added to the puree during mechanical soft and puree preparations and he/she was not aware additional sauce was supposed to be added to the top. During an interview on 4/3/19 at 3:35 P.M., the facility's consultant dietician said staff had been instructed to follow recipes and spreadsheets to properly prepare food items and to utilize the appropriate serving utensils according to the spreadsheet menu. Sauces or gravies should be served with the food items as directed.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine had an appropriate air gap to prevent back siphonage and failed to maintain the exhaust vent over the dish machine in ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine had an appropriate air gap to prevent back siphonage and failed to maintain the exhaust vent over the dish machine in the kitchen. The facility census was 31. 1. Observation on 4/3/19 at 9:36 A.M. showed the ice machine was positioned in the main dining room. The ice machine drain was comprised of PVC pipe that ran from the ice machine through the side of an adjacent cabinet and sink above. The PVC pipe (ice machine drain) was directly attached to the sink drain that was also made of PVC pipe. The drain pipe(s) then ran vertically downward through the floor of the cabinet. The end of the drain pipe sat directly on top of the floor drain underneath the edge of the cabinet. No air gap was present where the ice machine drain was attached to the sink drain, nor was there an air gap at the end of the drain pipe at the floor level. 2. Observation on 4/3/19 at 9:16 A.M. showed the exhaust vent was positioned directly over the top of the dish machine in the kitchen. The metal sides of the ductwork had an accumulation of gray fuzzy debris and dust. 3. During an interview on 4/3/19 at 1:25 P.M., the Dietary Manager said the ice machine was old and that the ice pack would build up inside the machine. When the ice built up, then the condensation drain would overflow and would backflow all over the dining room floor. The cabinet and sink next to the ice machine had been installed by maintenance in early 2018 when the dining room had been repainted. The ice machine drain had been placed through the cabinet at this time. Maintenance staff was also responsible for cleaning the dish machine exhaust vent once a month in the kitchen. During an interview on 4/3/19 at 1:40 P.M., the Maintenance Supervisor said he was not aware that the ice machine needed to have an air gap on the drain. The exhaust vent over the dish machine was cleaned monthly. The side walls of the ducts were also cleaned monthly. He said the vent grate had been cleaned recently but wasn't exactly sure when the side walls of the ducts had been cleaned previously.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, failed to ensure four residents (Residents #2, #24, #19, and #22), in a revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, failed to ensure four residents (Residents #2, #24, #19, and #22), in a review of 12 sampled residents, and their representatives were provided with a summary of the resident's baseline care plan. The facility census was 31. 1. During interview on 4/4/19 at 1:36 P.M., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator said the facility was unaware of the requirement to provide a copy of the baseline care plan to the resident and their representative. Staff reviewed the care plan with the resident and family representative and they would sign it. The facility staff did not give the resident and the family representative a copy of the baseline care plan. 2. Review of the facility policy Baseline Care Plans, obtained from the Nursing Services Policy and Procedure Manual for Long-Term Care, revised December 2016, showed the following: -A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission; -The resident and their representative will be provided a summary of the baseline care plan that includes but is not limited to the initial goals of the resident, a summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions, any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility, and any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan, as necessary. 3. Review of Resident #2's medical record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's baseline care plan showed staff completed the care plan on 12/19/18. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff provided the resident and his/her representative with a summary of the baseline care plan. 4. Review of Resident #24's medical record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's baseline care plan showed staff completed the care plan on 11/21/18. Neither the resident or his/her representative signed the baseline care plan. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff provided the resident and his/her representative with a summary of the baseline care plan. 5. Review of Resident #19's medical record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's baseline care plan showed staff completed the care plan on 2/15/19. Neither the resident or his/her representative signed the baseline care plan. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff provided the resident and his/her representative with a written summary of the baseline care plan. 6. Review of Resident #22's medical record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's baseline care plan showed it was completed on 8/29/18. Neither the resident or his/her representative signed the baseline care plan. Review of the resident's medical record showed no evidence staff provided the resident and his/her representative with a summary of the baseline care plan. 7. During interview on 4/3/19 at 12:50 P.M., the MDS Coordinator said the facility staff complete a baseline care plan as soon as a resident is admitted . The nurse goes over the information with the resident and/or their representative, but does not provide a copy of the baseline care plan to the resident or resident representative.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Missouri facilities.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 29 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • Grade D (40/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 40/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Clarence's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CLARENCE CARE CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Missouri, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Clarence Staffed?

CMS rates CLARENCE CARE CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Missouri average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Clarence?

State health inspectors documented 29 deficiencies at CLARENCE CARE CENTER during 2019 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 24 with potential for harm, and 3 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Clarence?

CLARENCE CARE CENTER is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 35 residents (about 58% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CLARENCE, Missouri.

How Does Clarence Compare to Other Missouri Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Missouri, CLARENCE CARE CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.5, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Clarence?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Clarence Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CLARENCE CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Missouri. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Clarence Stick Around?

CLARENCE CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Missouri average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Clarence Ever Fined?

CLARENCE CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Clarence on Any Federal Watch List?

CLARENCE CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.