BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Beartooth Rehabilitation and Nursing LLC has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. With no ranking in Montana or Stillwater County, it appears to have no local competition, which raises concerns about the lack of oversight. The facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 8 in 2024 to 15 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, showing a 0% turnover rate, but this is offset by troubling incidents; for example, a cognitively impaired resident suffered a serious injury after an unwitnessed fall due to insufficient supervision, and there were critical failures to provide timely assessments and care following this incident. Additionally, the facility has incurred $26,685 in fines, highlighting ongoing compliance issues that are concerning for prospective families.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Montana
- #112/223
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $26,685 in fines. Higher than 94% of Montana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 23 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 23 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
12 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and monitoring and ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize and protect a resident's right to be free from neglect, following a resident's major injury from an unwitnessed fall, and the res...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to perform a thorough head-to-toe assessment, pain assessment, or transfer a resident appropriately after an unwitnessed fall with injur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and uphold policies and procedures for the reporting of an unwitnessed fall, for a resident who was not a reliable reporter, and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate an abuse or neglect investigation following an event when ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change MDS for a resident's decline, for 1 (#4) of 12 sampled residents. This deficient practice incre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment within the required time frame for 1 (#3) of 12 sampled residents. Findings include:Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to code medications accurately on the MDS assessment for 1 (#3) of 12 sampled residents. Findings include:Review of resident #3's Quarterly MD...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan to include behavioral health services being provided for 1 (#3) of 12 sampled residents. This deficient pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0628
(Tag F0628)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a routine written notification of a resident transfer and discharge was completed and maintained, with information regarding the tra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0865
(Tag F0865)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation and demonstrate evidence of its ongoing QAPI program that meets the regulatory requirements, and show systems and re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have the required members for attendance and participation in Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings, including the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent certification survey in an area readily accessible to residents, family members, and residents' legal rep...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's room was kept clean and hazard-free as needed, and this concerned the resident and family, for 1 (#7) of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a facility policy which contained the name and contact information for the grievance official; failed t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment for 2 (#s 151 and 155) of 13 sampled residents. Findings include:
1. During an inter...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update resident care plans when changes to the resident's care occurred for 2 (#s 157 and 164) of 13 sampled residents. Findi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff member F failed to adhere to professional standards of practice by crushing a delayed release medication not recommended to crush, for 1 (#155...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was getting turned frequently enough to prevent skin breakdown, for 1 (#154) of 13 sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure BiPAP parameter orders were in place for 1 (#154) of 3 sampled residents with respiratory concerns. Findings include:
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prn psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days, for 1 (#156) of 13 sampled residents. Findings include:
During an interview on...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, resident-centered care plan which identified residents' physical and psychosocial needs to help th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
5. During an interview on 12/3/24 at 4:14 p.m., staff member D stated they did not know if the washing machine killed any pathogens present on clothing by heat, chemical, or both. Staff member D state...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $26,685 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 23 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $26,685 in fines. Higher than 94% of Montana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (13/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc's CMS Rating?
BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC does not currently have a CMS star rating on record.
How is Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc Staffed?
Detailed staffing data for BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC is not available in the current CMS dataset.
What Have Inspectors Found at Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc?
State health inspectors documented 23 deficiencies at BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC during 2024 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 20 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc?
BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE CHARLY BELLO FAMILY, THE MAZE FAMILY, THE SWAIN FAMILY, & WALTER MYERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes.
How Does Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc Compare to Other Montana Nursing Homes?
Comparison data for BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC relative to other Montana facilities is limited in the current dataset.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 0-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Montana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc Stick Around?
BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc Ever Fined?
BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC has been fined $26,685 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Montana average of $33,346. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Beartooth Rehabilitation And Nursing Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
BEARTOOTH REHABILITATION AND NURSING LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.