THE LIVING CENTRE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Living Centre in Stevensville, Montana, has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average and falls in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. It ranks #21 out of 59 facilities in Montana, placing it in the top half, and is the best option out of two facilities in Ravalli County. The facility's performance appears stable, with three issues reported in both 2024 and 2025. Staffing is rated at 4 out of 5 stars, indicating a strong workforce with a 55% turnover rate, which is typical for the state. However, the facility has been fined $37,525, which is concerning, and it has less RN coverage than 87% of facilities in Montana, meaning residents may not receive as much advanced nursing care. Specific incidents raise serious concerns. One critical incident involved a resident who suffered significant injuries, including fractures and a head laceration, after a fall. The facility failed to update the resident's care plan to prevent further falls. Additionally, a serious finding noted that one resident was subjected to verbal and physical abuse by a caregiver, causing them distress. While the staffing ratings are a strength, these troubling incidents highlight significant weaknesses that families should consider when researching this facility.
- Trust Score
- C
- In Montana
- #21/59
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $37,525 in fines. Higher than 73% of Montana facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 45 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Montana. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Montana avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. During an interview on 1/28/25 at 3:04 p.m., staff member I stated she was giving resident #29 a shower one day, and she could not remember the exact day, but stated she sent another CNA to get som...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0699
(Tag F0699)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide trauma informed care for a resident with PTSD, and the resident voiced having nightmares, and was identified as having hallucinatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged incident of verbal abuse to the State Survey Agency timely, as required, for 1 (#1) of 5 sampled residents. Findings incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one (#1) of 1 sampled resident from verbal and physical abuse by a caregiver. This deficiency caused the resident to cry out in pai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report suspected abuse to the State Survey Agency, for one (#1) of one sampled resident. Findings include:
During an interview on 6/3/24 at ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit Death in Facility MDS assessments for 2 (#s 17 and 33) and Discharge MDS assessments for 2 (#s 12 and 28) of 24 sampled residents. F...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility licensed nursing staff failed to thoroughly assess one resident to ensure app...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was identified the facility failed to ensure individualized fall care plans were update...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 2 residents (#s 25 and 28) of 2 sampled residents, from a n...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Survey Agency, which involved 3 (#s 25, 28, and 33) residents; and, #33 went into the roo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate alleged sexual abuse by resident #33, on 7/20/22, for 1 (#28) of 9 sampled residents. Findings include:
A request wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
During an interview on 2/15/23 at 1:14 p.m., staff member A said the facility did not complete a Notice of Transfer for resident #33 on 11/24/22. Staff member A stated she was not aware when a residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
During an interview on 2/15/23 at 1:14 p.m., staff member A stated there was no bed hold documentation for resident #33. She stated she was not aware there was a process for informing the resident of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor a resident after an elopement for 1 (#27) of 1 sampled resident. Findings include:
Review of a facility incident for resident #27, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
During an interview on 2/14/23 at 11:21 a.m., staff member B said PRN psychotropic medications are usually put in the order system with an end date. When the end date is over, the medication will drop...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $37,525 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 15 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $37,525 in fines. Higher than 94% of Montana facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade C (53/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is The Living Centre's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns THE LIVING CENTRE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Montana, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is The Living Centre Staffed?
CMS rates THE LIVING CENTRE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 55%, compared to the Montana average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at The Living Centre?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at THE LIVING CENTRE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 12 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates The Living Centre?
THE LIVING CENTRE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 50 certified beds and approximately 38 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in STEVENSVILLE, Montana.
How Does The Living Centre Compare to Other Montana Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Montana, THE LIVING CENTRE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (55%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting The Living Centre?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is The Living Centre Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, THE LIVING CENTRE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Montana. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at The Living Centre Stick Around?
THE LIVING CENTRE has a staff turnover rate of 55%, which is 9 percentage points above the Montana average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was The Living Centre Ever Fined?
THE LIVING CENTRE has been fined $37,525 across 2 penalty actions. The Montana average is $33,454. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is The Living Centre on Any Federal Watch List?
THE LIVING CENTRE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.