Bertrand Nursing Home

100 Minor Avenue, Bertrand, NE 68927 (308) 472-3341
Government - City 26 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
85/100
#1 of 177 in NE
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Bertrand Nursing Home has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average compared to other facilities. It ranks #1 out of 177 nursing homes in Nebraska, placing it in the top tier of state facilities, and it is also the best option out of three in Phelps County. The facility's performance is stable, with three issues noted in recent inspections, consistent with previous years. Staffing is generally good with a 4 out of 5 rating, though a 60% turnover rate is concerning and higher than the state average. Additionally, there have been no fines recorded, which is a positive sign. However, there are some weaknesses to consider. Recent inspections revealed that the Infection Preventionist was not properly trained, which could pose risks for residents. There were also issues with outdated food items being available in the kitchen, and food that was not properly labeled or dated, raising concerns about food safety. While the overall care and RN coverage is strong, families should be aware of these specific incidents when making their decision.

Trust Score
B+
85/100
In Nebraska
#1/177
Top 1%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Holding Steady
1 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 64 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Nebraska nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 60%

14pts above Nebraska avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Staff turnover is elevated (60%)

12 points above Nebraska average of 48%

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on an observation and an interview, the facility failed to store food in a manner to prevent the potential for food born illness. This had the pot...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E) Based on an observation and an interview, the facility failed to store food in a manner to prevent the potential for food born illness. This had the potential to affect all residents who ate out of the kitchen. The facility census was 18. Findings are: An observation on 4/28/25 at 10:17 AM revealed in the stand up refrigerator: - a metal silver bowl with macaroni salad was not labeled or dated, - a metal silver bowl of cut up muskmelons was not labeled or dated. An observation on 4/28/25 at 10:30 AM revealed in the stand up freezer: -a zip lock bag of corn dogs with no opened date on it and ice crystals observed on the corn dogs, -a bag of opened fish sticks with no opened date on them, - a gallon tub of vanilla Ice cream that was opened with no date on it. A review of the Food and Nutrient Services Policy and Procedure Food Safety: Topic Refrigerated Storage Dated: February 2009, Revised August 2017 -All refrigerated items are stored in the original container/packaging or in a container that is fully covered or sealed so as to maintain freshness and quality and prevent cross-contamination -All items are labeled with the common name of the item and dated with the month, day and year when opened or prepared. An interview on 4/28/25 at 11:00 AM with the Dietary Supervisor confirmed that the items listed above had no name (not labeled) or was not dated when opened or prepared and should have been dated and/or labeled.
Apr 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had the required qualifications prior to assuming the role. This had the potential to affect all residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had the required qualifications prior to assuming the role. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 19. Findings are: During an interview on 04/08/2024 at 10:13 AM, the Administrator (ADM) revealed that Registered Nurse (RN) A was the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP-a professional who makes sure the facility's staff and residents are doing all the things they should to prevent the spread of infections). The ADM further revealed that RN A had not completed the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course. The ADM also revealed that the previous IP had left at the end of March 2024, and RN A had assumed the role on 04/01/2024. The ADM provided copies of Certificate of Training CDC Train for RN A for a total of six modules completed: -Module 1-Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 03/28/2024. -Module 2-The Infection Preventionistdated 03/28/2024. -Module 3-Integrating Infection Prevention and Control into the Quality Assurance Performance improvement Program dated 04/02/2024. -Module 4-Infection Surveillance dated 04/02/2024. -Module 5-Outbreaks dated 04/02/2024. -Module 13 -Occupational Health Considerations for the Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 03/28/2024. A review of the CDC website https://www.cdc.gov/longtermcare/training.html revealed the Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training course consisted of 23 modules and sub-modules. During an interview on 04/11/2024 at 2:20 PM, the DON confirmed confirmed RN A had been working on the Infection Prevention modules through the CDC but was not done.
Apr 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, record review, and interview: the facility kitchen staff fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation, record review, and interview: the facility kitchen staff failed to ensure outdated foods were not available for use. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility staff identified a census of 19. Findings are: Observation on 4-17-23 at 9:30 AM with the morning [NAME] A revealed the following outdated food items: -Cornstarch expiration dates was 5/22. -Creamy rice cereal expiration dates was 6/21. -3 large bag potato chips expiration dates was 2/23. -Champions pizza sauce expiration dates was 11/22. -Baby kidney beans expiration dates was 1/23. -Krispy onions expiration dates was 5/22. -Chili sauce expiration dates was 5/22. -[NAME] dressing expiration dates was 1/23. -Taco shells expiration dates was 9/22. On 4-17-23 at 9:30 AM interview an interview was conducted with [NAME] A. During the interview [NAME] A confirmed the food items were outdated and available for use.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Nebraska.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
  • • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Bertrand Nursing Home's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Bertrand Nursing Home an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Bertrand Nursing Home Staffed?

CMS rates Bertrand Nursing Home's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 60%, which is 14 percentage points above the Nebraska average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Bertrand Nursing Home?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at Bertrand Nursing Home during 2023 to 2025. These included: 3 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates Bertrand Nursing Home?

Bertrand Nursing Home is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 26 certified beds and approximately 17 residents (about 65% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Bertrand, Nebraska.

How Does Bertrand Nursing Home Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Bertrand Nursing Home's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (60%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bertrand Nursing Home?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Bertrand Nursing Home Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Bertrand Nursing Home has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Bertrand Nursing Home Stick Around?

Staff turnover at Bertrand Nursing Home is high. At 60%, the facility is 14 percentage points above the Nebraska average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 67%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Bertrand Nursing Home Ever Fined?

Bertrand Nursing Home has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Bertrand Nursing Home on Any Federal Watch List?

Bertrand Nursing Home is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.