Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not outstanding. It ranks #89 out of 177 facilities in Nebraska, placing it in the bottom half of the state, but it is #1 of 2 in Merrick County, meaning it is the best option locally. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with reported issues increasing from 1 in 2023 to 5 in 2024. Staffing is a strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 27%, which is well below the state average of 49%. On a positive note, the facility has no fines on record, but it has faced concerns such as unclean conditions in the tub and shower room, a failure to ensure proper hand hygiene during meal preparation, and not following infection control procedures for a resident after surgery. These factors highlight the need for families to consider both the strengths and weaknesses when researching this nursing home.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Nebraska
- #89/177
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below Nebraska's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Nebraska. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (27%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (27%)
21 points below Nebraska average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Nebraska average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(1)
Based on observations, record review, and interviews; the facility failed to prevent urinary catheters from becoming contaminated during personal ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(J)
The facility failed to ensure the physician ordered and recommended amount of Glucerna was provided to residents who had triggered for malnutrition or th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C.
Record review of the Progress Notes for Resident 132 revealed they had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a hospita...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-00.10(D)
Based on observation, record review, and interviews; the facility failed to have a medication error rate less then 5% with an observed medication error ra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** B.
Observation on 8/12/2024 at 09:15 AM of the tub and shower room. The room floor is comprised of 1x1 tiles which then go up th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
License Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.11E
The facility failed to ensure that staff performed hand sanitization (hand washing using soap and water or an alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) during meal prep...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2022
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.05 (1)
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative with one of the two required beneficiary no...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7b
Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent potential falls for 1 of 4 sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.12E7
Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to ensure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.05 (21)
Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to protect the dignity of residents by not ensuring that the resident mechanica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.18A(1)
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure that resident rooms were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.11E
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility staff failed to serve food in a manner to prevent potential cross contamination by handli...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
D. Record review of Resident 31's Order Summary Report with order dates of 5/4/22, 5/5/22, and 5/12/22, revealed Resident 31 had respiratory illnesses and depends on enabling machines and devices to a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- • 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below Nebraska's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital Staffed?
CMS rates Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 27%, compared to the Nebraska average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital during 2022 to 2024. These included: 13 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital?
Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 46 certified beds and approximately 31 residents (about 67% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Central City, Nebraska.
How Does Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (27%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital Stick Around?
Staff at Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 27%, the facility is 19 percentage points below the Nebraska average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital Ever Fined?
Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital on Any Federal Watch List?
Litzenberg Memorial County Hospital is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.