Life Care Center of Elkhorn

20275 Hopper Street, Elkhorn, NE 68022 (402) 289-2572
For profit - Corporation 135 Beds LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
40/100
#88 of 177 in NE
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

The Life Care Center of Elkhorn has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average care with some notable concerns. They rank #88 out of 177 nursing homes in Nebraska, placing them in the top half of facilities in the state, and #12 of 23 in Douglas County, meaning there are only 11 local options better than this facility. Unfortunately, the trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 5 in 2023 to 11 in 2024. Staffing is relatively stable with a turnover rate of 39%, below the state average, but their RN coverage is only average, which may impact the quality of care. While the facility has not incurred any fines, there have been serious deficiencies identified, including failure to monitor residents’ weight changes properly and inadequate attention to hydration needs, suggesting lapses in care that could affect residents' health. Overall, families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses carefully when considering this nursing home for their loved ones.

Trust Score
D
40/100
In Nebraska
#88/177
Top 49%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
5 → 11 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
39% turnover. Near Nebraska's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 31 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Nebraska. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
34 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 5 issues
2024: 11 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (39%)

    9 points below Nebraska average of 48%

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Nebraska average (2.9)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 39%

Near Nebraska avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Chain: LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 34 deficiencies on record

4 actual harm
Aug 2024 11 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to evaluate and implement interventions to prevent significant weight loss ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to evaluate and implement interventions to prevent significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 37) of 1 resident sampled. The facility census was 86. The Findings are: Record Review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-28-2024 revealed an admission date of 06-25-2024 following hospitalization for surgery of a diaphragmatic Hernia with Obstruction (is a protrusion of abdominal contents into the thoracic cavity due to a defect within the diaphragm), other diagnosis included Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD, is a long-term condition that occurs when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus), Barrett's Esophagus (is a condition in which the flat pink lining of the swallowing tube that connects the mouth to the stomach (esophagus) becomes damaged by acid reflux, which causes the lining to thicken and become red) with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The MDS also indicated Resident 37 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. A score of 0-7 equals severe impairment, 8-12 indicates moderate impairment and 13-15 indicates cognitively intact) score of 15 and required set up assistance from staff for oral and personal hygiene, partial assistance for dressing, substantial assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for bathing and transfers. The MDS also revealed Resident 14 weighed 120 pounds. An interview conducted with Resident 37 on 08-07-2024 at 11:54 AM revealed Resident 37 thought they had lost weight but did not know how much. Record Review of Resident 37's Electronic Health Record (EHR, is a digital version of a patient's paper chart) under weights and vitals revealed the following weights: -06-26-2024 weight 120.6 pounds taken on a wheelchair scale. -06-28-2024 weight 120.4 pounds taken on a wheelchair scale. -07-01-2024 weight 120.1 pounds taken on a wheelchair scale. -07-22-2024 weight 114.0 pounds taken on a wheelchair scale, a loss of 6.6 pounds or 5.47% compared to the weight on 6-26-2024. Record Review of Resident 37's Dietary Progress Notes (DPN) revealed on 07-08-2024 Registered Dietician (RD) had identified a current body weight of 120.1 and a Body Mass Index (BMI, is a calculation that estimates body fat and a person's relative weight for their height) of 20.6. The DPN dated 07-08-2024 further identified nutritional supplements had not been ordered, but since Resident 37 was at the low end of a healthy BMI the RD identified Resident 37 could benefit from added calories and recommended a Magic Cup (a nutritional supplement) twice a day at lunch and dinner. According to the DPN dated 07-08-2024, the RD would continue to follow Resident 37 for weight trends, orders/supplements, and to evaluate for further recommendations as needed. Record Review of an email from the facility RD to the facility Director of Nursing (DON) and the DFS on 07-08-2024 revealed a recommendation from the RD to add a Magic Cup to Resident 37's lunch and supper trays. Record Review of progress notes, assessments and care plan in Resident 37's EHR revealed no additional nutritional evaluation related to the significant weight loss on 7-22-2024. An observation conducted during the interview with Resident 37 on 08-07-2024 at 11:54 AM revealed Resident 37 had been served a lunch tray without a Magic cup or other nutritional supplement. An interview with the facility RD on 08-08-2024 at 10:30 AM revealed the RD was at the facility on 07-31-2024 and had not noticed and had not been notified of a weight loss of 6.6 pounds for Resident 37. The RD confirmed during the interview Resident 37 had unplanned weight loss was 5% of Resident 37's body weight within 30 days which was clinically significant. The RD also confirmed Resident 37's physician had not been updated on the significant weight loss and on 07-08-2024 a Magic Cup with lunch and dinner had been recommended. An observation on 08-08-2024 at 12:24 PM of Resident 37 eating lunch revealed the absence of a Magic Cup on the lunch meal tray, Further observation on 08-08-2024 at 12:24 PM revealed Resident 37's dietary slip on the tray did not direct the staff to give a Magic cup with lunch. A follow up interview was conducted with Resident 37 on 08-08-2024 at 12:24 PM. During the interview Resident 37 reported (gender) had received a frozen nutritional supplement for a couple of days and then it stopped. An interview with the Director of Food Service (DFS) on 08-08-2024 at 12:44 PM confirmed the Magic cup was not on the dietary slip for Resident 37. During the interview the DFS reported they were not aware the Magic cup was recommended for Resident 37. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K on 08-08-2024 1:48 PM revealed LPN K was passing medication for Resident 37 and confirmed (gender) had not provided a Magic Cup at lunch. An interview with Registered Nurse (RN) J on 08-08-2024 at 1:50 PM confirmed (gender) had not provided a Magic Cup for Resident 37 at lunch. Record Review of the Facility Policy Hydration and Nutrition dated 08-24-2023 revealed the following: - Policy-each resident receives a sufficient amount of food and fluids to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status. Under the section Procedure: -1. A physician order is obtained for all regular and therapeutic diets, including those with modified textures. -2. A minimum of three meals are provided each day. If a meal or particular food is refused, the resident is offered a substitute of a similar nutritive value. -3. Snacks are given between meals and at bedtime according to resident desire and/or need. -4. Fluid is available to residents at all times. -5. The resident is positioned properly to consume meals and snacks. -6. An ongoing assessment of the ability to consume and assimilate food and fluid is conducted by nursing personnel and all concerns are reported to the nurse, to include -Positioning needs, -Environmental and social considerations -Ability of resident to feed self -Ability of resident to chew, drink and swallow -Amount of food lost in spillage -Nutritional balance or imbalance of intake -Weight loss or gain -Signs of dehydration -7. Consultation with dietary and therapy personnel is performed on admission and as needed. -8. The facility will document intake percentages. -9. The physician is notified of any concerns. The facility was not able to provide additional information related to the evaluation of Resident 37's significant weight loss prior to exiting the facility on 08-13-2024.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 37) of 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(J)(i)(1) Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 37) of 1 resident sampled. The facility census was 86. The Findings are: Record Review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-28-2024 revealed an admission date of 06-25-2024 following hospitalization for surgery of a diaphragmatic Hernia with Obstruction (is a protrusion of abdominal contents into the thoracic cavity due to a defect within the diaphragm), other diagnosis included Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD, is a long-term condition that occurs when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus), Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH, a non-cancerous condition that causes the prostate gland to enlarge in men), Barrett's Esophagus (is a condition in which the flat pink lining of the swallowing tube that connects the mouth to the stomach (esophagus) becomes damaged by acid reflux, which causes the lining to thicken and become red) with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The MDS also indicated Resident 37 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. A score of 0-7 equals severe impairment, 8-12 indicates moderate impairment and 13-15 indicates cognitively intact) score of 15 and required set up assistance from staff for oral and personal hygiene, partial assistance for dressing, substantial assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for bathing and transfers. The MDS also revealed Resident 14 weighed 120 pounds. An interview conducted with Resident 37 on 08-07-2024 at 11:54 AM revealed Resident 37 thought they had lost weight but did not know how much. Record Review of Resident 37's Electronic Health Record (EHR, is a digital version of a patient's paper chart) under weights and vitals revealed the following weights: -06-26-2024 weight 120.6 pounds taken on a wheelchair scale. -06-28-2024 weight 120.4 pounds taken on a wheelchair scale. -07-01-2024 weight 120.1 pounds taken on a wheelchair scale. -07-22-2024 weight 114.0 pounds taken on a wheelchair scale,a loss of 6.6 pounds or 5.47% compared to the weight on 6-26-2024. Record Review of Resident 37's Dietary Progress Notes (DPN) revealed on 07-08-2024 Registered Dietician (RD) had identified a current body weight of 120.1 and a Body Mass Index (BMI, is a calculation that estimates body fat and a person's relative weight for their height) of 20.6. The DPN dated 07-08-2024 further identified nutritional supplements had not been ordered, but since Resident 37 was at the low end of a healthy BMI the RD identified Resident 37 could benefit from added calories and recommended a Magic Cup (a nutritional supplement) twice a day at lunch and dinner. According to the DPN dated 07-08-2024, the RD would continue to follow Resident 37 for weight trends, orders/supplements, and to evaluate for further recommendations as needed. Record Review of the Facility Policy Hydration and Nutrition dated 08-24-2023 revealed the following - Policy-each resident receives a sufficient amount of food and fluids to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status. Under the section Procedure: 1. A physician order is obtained for all regular and therapeutic diets, including those with modified textures. 2. A minimum of three meals are provided each day. If a meal or particular food is refused, the resident is offered a substitute of a similar nutritive value. 3. Snacks are given between meals and at bedtime according to resident desire and/or need. 4. Fluid is available to residents at all times. 5. The resident is positioned properly to consume meals and snacks. 6. An ongoing assessment of the ability to consume and assimilate food and fluid is conducted by nursing personnel and all concerns are reported to the nurse, to include -Positioning needs, -Environmental and social considerations -Ability of resident to feed self -Ability of resident to chew, drink and swallow -Amount of food lost in spillage -Nutritional balance or imbalance of intake -Weight loss or gain -Signs of dehydration -7. Consultation with dietary and therapy personnel is performed on admission and as needed. -8. The facility will document intake percentages. -9. The physician is notified of any concerns. An interview with the facility RD on 08-08-2024 at 10:30 AM revealed the RD was at the facility on 07-31-2024 and had not noticed and had not been notified of a weight loss of 6 pounds for Resident 37. The RD also confirmed the unplanned weight loss was 5% of Resident 37's body weight in 30 days which was clinically significant. The RD also confirmed Resident 37's physician had not been updated on the significant weight loss.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(H) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to report ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(H) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to report a fall resulting in serious bodily injury to the state agency for 1 (Resident 2) of 1 residents sampled. The facility census was 86. Findings are: Record Review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-21-2024 revealed Resident 2 had diagnosis of Dementia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), anxiety and depression.The MDS also indicated Resident 2 needed staff to set up and supervise bathing and was independent with bed mobility, dressing, hygiene, and ambulation. Record Review of Resident 2's Progress Notes (PN) dated 08-08-2024 revealed Resident 2's roommate yelled for help and staff found Resident 2 on the bathroom floor, curled up on the right side. The PN also indicated the resident was crying and had bleeding from the right cheek. The facility staff called 911 and Resident 2 was transferred to the hospital. Record review of Resident 2's PN dated 8-08-2024 with a time identified as 9:57 AM revealed Resident 2 returned to the facility from the hospital. According to the PN dated 8-08-2024 with a time of 9:57 AM revaeled Resident 2 had recived 3 stiches to the right upper check. An interview conducted on 08-08-2024 with Registered Nurse (RN) J revealed Resident 2 had a fall during the night and was sent to the hospital. RN J also revealed Resident 2 had sutures placed to the laceration on the right cheek at the hospital. An observation on 08-08-2024 at 11:05 AM revealed Resident 2 had returned to the facility with a band aid on the right cheek. An interview conducted with RN J on 08-08-2024 at 11:55 AM confirmed Resident 2 had fallen on 08-08-2024 resulting in a laceration requiring sutures. Record Review of the facility policy Abuse-Reporting and Response-No Crime Suspected dated 06-17-2024 revealed: -The facility will report alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, or abuse including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property and report the results of all investigations to the proper authorities (including the State Survey Agency and Adult Protective Services, APS) within prescribed timeframe's. -Initial Report- -For alleged abuse or if there is serious bodily injury, the facility must report the allegation immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made. An interview conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08-12-2024 at 1:35 PM confirmed Resident 2 fell on [DATE] and was sent to the hospital for a laceration to the right cheek that required sutures. The DON also indicated that the fall with serious bodily injury had not been reported to any state agency.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(D) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensur...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(D) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 57) of 1 sampled resident's tube feeding was on the Minimum Data Set (MDS)(a comprehensive assessment used to develop a resident's care plan) dated 07/12/2024 and Insulin and Insulin injections were excluded from the 7/12/24 MDS. The facility census was 86. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) & (and) Care Plan Development policy with a reviewed date of 08/22/2023 revealed the facility would follow the procedures in the RAI User's Manual 3.0 when completing the MDS and the facility must make a comprehensive (complete) assessment of the resident's needs, strengths, goals, life history, and preferences using the RAI. A record review of Resident 57's Clinical Census dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 57's Medical Diagnosis dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Hemiplegia And Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side (paralysis following a stroke), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxemia (low oxygen in blood), Chronic Systolic (congestive) Heart Failure, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction (impairment to speech following a stroke), Dysphasia Following Cerebral Infarction (trouble swallowing following a stroke), and Encounter For Attention To Gastronomy (G-tube feeding tube). A record review of Resident 57's Care Plan with an admission date of 04/08/2024 revealed the resident required tube feeding but did not reveal the resident required Insulin or Insulin injections. A record review of Resident 57's MDS dated 07/12/2024 revealed the resident did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)(a score of a residents cognitive abilities) due to the resident was rarely/never understood. The resident was dependent or required substantial/maximal staff assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS did not reveal the resident a feeding tube but did reveal the resident received Insulin injections and was on a Hypoglycemic (a medication used to increase blood sugar) (including insulin). A record review of Resident 57's Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record (MAR & TAR) dated April 2024 - August 2024 did not reveal the resident received Insulin but did reveal the resident was on enteral feeding (feeding directly through a tube in the stomach) via a G-tube. A record review of Resident 57's Order Summary Report dated 08/12/2024 revealed the resident had physician orders for enteral feeding and G-tube care but did not reveal the resident had physician orders for Insulin or Insulin injections. An observation on 08/12/2024 at 10:53 AM revealed Resident 57 was administered tube feeding through a G tube in the resident's abdomen. In an interview on 08/07/2024 at 11:02 AM, Resident 57's Power of Attorney (POA)(a person designated to handle a resident's financial and healthcare affairs) confirmed the resident was not on Insulin or Insulin injections, and was on tube feedings. In an interview on 08/08/2024 at 2:44 PM, the facility Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) confirmed the resident was not on insulin or insulin injections and was on enteral feeding via a G-tube and the 07/12/2024 MDS was incorrect.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility faile...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 26) of 5 sampled resident's oxygen order was followed and failed to ensure 1 (Resident 42) of 5 sampled residents had valid oxygen orders. The facility census was 86. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Physician Orders policy with a revised date of 02/26/2024 revealed a Physician, Physician's Assistant, or Nurse Practioner must provide orders for the resident's immediate care and ongoing care of the resident. A. A record review of Resident 26's Clinical Census dated 08/13/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 26's Medical Diagnosis dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Morbid (severe) Obesity Due To Excess Calories (overweight), Chronic Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia (low oxygen), End Stage Renal Disease (kidney failure), Pleural Plaque Without Asbestos (thickened tissue around the lung), and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). A record review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS)(a coplete assessment of the resident) dated 05/03/2024 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)(a score of a residents cognitive abilities) score of 14 of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively aware, The resident was independent with eating, toileting, and personal and oral hygiene (cleaning). The resident required partial assistance with dressing, and partial/moderate assistance with bathing and putting on footwear. The MDS revealed the resident was on oxygen (o2). A record review of Resident 26's Care Plan with an admission date of 05/18/2023 revealed the resident was on oxygen and was to receive oxygen as ordered by the physician. A record review of Resident 26's Order Summary Report dated 08/12/2024 revealed the resident had a physician's order for oxygen at 1 liter per minute (l/m) continuously per nasal cannula (NC)(an tubing in the nose to deliver o2), and another order for oxygen with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)(a machine used to treat sleep apnea). An observation on 08/08/2024 at 3:21 PM revealed the resident was in the room sleeping without CPAP or NC on and the o2 concentrator (a machine that purifies oxygen) was not running. An observation on 08/08/2024 at 10:04 AM revealed the resident was in the wheelchair leaving the facility without oxygen on. An observation on 08/12/2024 at 07:28 AM revealed the resident was in the room sleeping with CPAP on, the oxygen was not attached to the CPAP, and the concentrator was not running. An observation on 08/12/2024 at 8:25 AM revealed the resident was in the room sitting up eating breakfast without oxygen on and the concentrator was not running. In an interview on 08/12/2024 at 8:25 AM, Resident 26 confirmed the resident was not on o2 and did not refuse to wear oxygen if requested. In an interview 08/12/2024 at 7:31 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-N, the charge nurse on the 200-hall confirmed Resident 26 had an order to be on oxygen continuously and the resident was not on oxygen. B. A record review of Resident 42's Clinical Census dated 08/13/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 42's Medical Diagnosis dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of Chronic Respiratory Failure With Hypoxia (low oxygen), Chronic Diastolic (congestive) Heart Failure (CHF), and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. A record review of Resident 26's MDS dated 07/05/2024 revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15 of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively aware, The resident was dependent on staff for toileting, lower body dressing, and footwear. The resident needed substantial/maximal assistance bathing and upper body dressing, and partial/moderate assistance with oral (cleaning). The MDS did not reveal the resident was on o2. A record review of Resident 26's Care Plan with an admission date of 05/18/2023 revealed the resident was on oxygen in the Focus area of Average Volume-Assured Pressure Support (AVAPS)(a ventilator mode) related to OSA and Chronic Respiratory Failure. A record review of Resident 26's Order Summary Report dated 08/13/2024 revealed the resident had physician orders of Oxygen with CPAP/Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure: Pressure setting full face mask (AVAPS) respiratory rate 22, Tidal Volume 400, High pressure of 24, Low pressure of 10, Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure of 8 and 40% (percent) oxygen. The Order Summary Report dated 08/13/2024 did not reveal that oxygen was to be used when not on the AVAPS. An observation on 08/07/2024 at 3:04 PM revealed Resident 42 was sitting in a wheelchair with an o2 NC on and the o2 tank set at 2 l/m. An observation on 08/08/2024 at 3:22 PM revealed Resident 42 was sitting in bed with an o2 NC on and the concentrator set at 2.5 l/m. An observation on 08/12/2024 at 2:23 PM revealed Resident 42 was sitting in bed with an o2 NC on and the concentrator set at 2.5 l/m. An observation on 08/13/2024 at 9:25 AM with LPN-E, the charge nurse on the 200-hall, revealed Resident 42 was sitting in bed with an o2 NC on and the concentrator running at 2 l/m. In an interview on 08/07/2024 at 3:04 PM, Resident 42 confirmed the resident wears the oxygen continuously, even with the AVAPS. In an interview on 08/13/2024 at 9:25 AM, LPN-E, the charge nurse on the 200-hall, confirmed LPN-E reviewed Resident 42's physician orders and Resident 42 did not have an order to be on oxygen while not on the AVAPS, but was.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(vi)(3) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(vi)(3) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident 26 and 57) of 2 sampled resident's shunt site (an access point to a major artery) was assessed before and after each dialysis (mechanical treatment of the blood to clean it of impurities) treatment. The facility census was 86. Findings are: A record review of the facility's Hemodialysis Offsite Policy dated 04/17/2023 revealed the facility assures each resident received care and services for the provision of services which includes ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before and after dialysis treatments received at a certified dialysis facility and ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. A. A record review of Resident 57's Clinical Census dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A record review of Resident 57's Medical Diagnosis dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease (kidney failure), Dependence On Renal Dialysis, Hypertensive Heart And Chronic Kidney Disease With Heart Failure And With Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease, Or End Stage Renal Disease (heart failure due to high blood pressure and kidney failure)Hemiplegia And Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side (paralysis following a stroke), Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxemia (low oxygen in blood), Chronic Systolic (congestive) Heart Failure, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction (impairment to speech following a stroke), Dysphasia Following Cerebral Infarction (trouble swallowing following a stroke), and Encounter For Attention To Gastronomy (G-tube feeding tube). A record review of Resident 57's Minimum Data Set (MDS)(and comprehensive assessment of the resident) dated 07/12/2024 revealed the resident did not have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)(a score of a residents cognitive abilities) due to the resident was rarely/never understood. The resident was dependent or required substantial/maximal staff assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS did reveal the resident was on dialysis. A record review of Resident 57's Care Plan with an admission date of 04/08/2024 revealed the resident required dialysis for End Stage Renal Disease and interventions to assess shunt site for bruit (vascular mummer) and thrill (vibration felt when touching), check and change dressing daily at access site. A record review of Resident 57's Order Summary Report dated 08/12/2024 revealed the resident had a physician's order for Dialysis Resident: Assess shunt site for thrill/bruit and bleeding every shift for dialysis care, and send to dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 5:20 AM. A record review of Resident 57's Pre/Post Dialysis Communication forms in the resident's hard chart dated: 05/03/2024 - 08/09/2024 revealed the Pre-Dialysis assessment was to be completed by the skilled nursing facility and staff was to record the resident's temperature, pulse, respirations, blood pressure, weight, lung sounds, access site, antibiotic, bruit, thrill, medications to be given at the dialysis center and if a meal was to be given at the dialysis center. Post-Dialysis assessment to be completed by the skilled nursing facility and the staff was to record temperature, pulse, respirations, blood pressure, weight, access site, bruit, thrill, and if there was a sit change. The Pre/Post Dialysis Communication forms dated: 05/03/2024 - 08/09/2024 revealed: -05/03/2024 no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed -05/06/2024 no form -05/08/2024 no form -05/10/2024 no form -05/13/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/15/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/17/2024 no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed -05/21/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/24/2024 no form -05/27/2024 no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed -05/29/2024 no form -05/31/2024 no form -06/03/2024 - 6/28/2024 no form -07/12/2024 no form -07/01/2024 no form -07/05/2024 no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed -07/08/2024 no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed -07/10/2024 - 07/29/2024 no form -07/31/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -08/02/2024 - 08/07/2024 no form -08/09/2024 no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed A record review of Resident 57's Pre/Post Dialysis Communication dated 05/03/2024 - 08/09/2024 the facility provided on 8/13/2024 were the same as above except for the following: -05/03/2024 Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/17/2024 Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/22/2024 Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed -05/24/2024 Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/27/2024 Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -06/03/2024 Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -06/05/2024 form, but 1 copy had no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment completed and 2 copies had Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -06/17/2024 form now and Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -07/01/2024 form and Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -07/12/2024 form and Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -07/15/2024 form but no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed -07/19/2024 form and both pre and post dialysis completed except condition of access/site -07/22/2024 form and pre and post completed except condition of access/site pre dialysis -07/26/2024 form and Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed -08/05/2024 form and both sections completed except condition of access/site -08/07/2024 form and Pre-Dialysis form now complete except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed A record review of Resident 57's Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record MAR & TAR) dated May 2024 - August 11, 2024 revealed the residents shunt site was not assessed every shift on: -05/15/2024 -05/24/2024 -05/29/2024 -06/04/2024 -06/15/2024 -07/10/2024 -07/19/2024 -07/25/2024 -07/31/2024 -08/01/2024 -08/02/2024 An observation on 08/12/2024 at 10:02 AM through 10:53 AM revealed the driver brought Resident 57 back from dialysis in a wheelchair and left in the hallway by the resident's room. The driver then went to the nurse's station to let them know the resident was back. At 10:25 AM revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-N took the resident to the nurse's station and weighed the resident and took the resident back down the hall and placed the resident by the resident's room. At 10:29 AM revealed LPN-N took a blood pressure on the resident while the resident was seated in the hall. At 10:41 AM revealed LPN-N gave the resident oral medications in the hall and then moved the resident to the resident's room. At 10:48 AM 2 Nursing Assistants entered the room and assisted the resident to bed. At 10:52 AM LPN-A entered the room and administered medications and tube feeding, the observation revealed the dialysis shunt site was located on the resident's left upper arm. In an interview on 08/12/2024 at 11:06 AM, LPN-N confirmed LPN-N did not know where Resident 57's dialysis shunt site was located, and LPN-N had not assessed the site for bruit, thrill, or bleeding, and should have when the resident returned. In an interview on 08/13/2024 at 10:54 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the staff was not completing the Pre/Post Dialysis Communication sheets accurately and that the shunt site assessments are not always getting completed and should be. B. A record review of Resident 26's Medical Diagnosis dated 08/08/2024 revealed the resident had diagnoses of End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence On Renal Dialysis, Long Term (current) Use Of Anticoagulants (blood thinners), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (uncontrolled blood sugar), Hypertensive Heart And Chronic Kidney Disease With Heart Failure And With Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease, Or End Stage Renal Disease, Chronic Vascular Disorders Of Intestine (long term blood flow restriction to intestine), and Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). A record review of Resident 26's MDS dated 05/03/2024 revealed the resident had a BIMS Score of 14 of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively aware, The resident was independent with eating, toileting, and personal and oral hygiene (cleaning). The resident required partial assistance with dressing, and partial/moderate assistance with bathing and putting on footwear. The MDS revealed the resident was on dialysis. A record review of Resident 26's Care Plan with an admission date of 05/18/2023 revealed the resident was on dialysis 3 times per week and had interventions to assess shunt site for bruit and thrill and check and change dressing daily at access site. A record review of Resident 26's Order Summary Report dated 08/12/2024 revealed the resident had a physician's order for Dialysis Resident: Assess shunt site for thrill/bruit and bleeding every shift for dialysis care, and send to dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 10:40 AM. A record review of Resident 26's Pre/Post Dialysis Communication forms dated: 05/03/2024 - 08/09/2024 revealed the Pre-Dialysis assessment was to be completed by the skilled nursing facility and staff was to record the resident's temperature, pulse, respirations, blood pressure, weight, lung sounds, access site, antibiotic, bruit, thrill, medications to be given at the dialysis center and if a meal was to be given at the dialysis center. Post-Dialysis assessment to be completed by the skilled nursing facility and the staff was to record temperature, pulse, respirations, blood pressure, weight, access site, bruit, thrill, and if there was a sit change. The Pre/Post Dialysis Communication forms dated: 05/03/2024 - 08/09/2024 revealed: -05/03/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment wasn't completed; Post Dialysis was partially completed (not site assessment) -05/06/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/08/2024 no form -05/10/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/13/2024 no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed -05/15/2024 no form -05/17/2024 no form -05/21/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/24/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -05/27/2024 no form -05/29/2024 no form -05/31/2024 no Pre-Dialysis or Post Dialysis assessment was completed -06/03/2024 - 6/10/2024 no form -06/10/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment wasn't completed; Post Dialysis was partially completed (not site assessment) -06/12/2024 - 06/24/2024 no form -06/26/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -06/28/2024 - 07/12/2024 no form -07/15/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment wasn't completed; Post Dialysis was partially completed (not site assessment) -07/17/2024 no form -07/19/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed, Post Dialysis was not completed -07/22/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment wasn't completed; Post Dialysis was partially completed (not site assessment) -07/24/2024 no form -07/26/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment wasn't completed; Post Dialysis was partially completed (not site assessment) -07/29/2024 - 8/7/2024 no form -08/09/2024 Pre-Dialysis assessment completed except site assessment, Post Dialysis was not completed A record review of Resident 26's Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration Record MAR & TAR) dated May 2024 - August 11, 2024 revealed the residents shunt site was not assessed every shift on: -05/15/2024 -05/24/2024 -06/15/2024 -07/10/2024 -07/31/2024 -8/01/2024 In an interview on 08/13/2024 at 10:54 AM, the DON confirmed that the staff was not completing the Pre/Post Dialysis Communication sheets accurately and that the shunt site assessments are not always getting completed and should be.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to update and re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to update and revise Care Plans for straight catheterization, wound care, tube feeding, and dental care for 4 (Resident 6, 68, 34, and 14) of 4 residents sampled. The facility census was 86. Findings are: A. Record review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 6/18/24 revealed the resident's admission date was 6/7/24. Resident was unable to participate with the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief screener to determine cognition) due to being rarely/never understood. According to the MDS, Resident 6 required supervision/touching assist with eating and was dependent for bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. The MDS also revealed the resident was always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. Resident 6's primary diagnosis was stroke. Other diagnosis included on the MDS were aphasia (non-speaking), and hemiplegia (paralysis on the right side). A record review of the Resident 6's Physician's Order Summary dated 8/8/2024 revealed the resident had an indwelling foley catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to provide an outlet for urine and the urine is collected into a bag) for urinary retention upon admission. According to Resident 6;s Physician Order Summary the indwelling foley catheter was discontinued on 6/12/2024 . A record review of Resident 6's care plan dated 6/7/24 revealed a focus of the resident had an indwelling catheter and incontinent at risk due to pain. The goal of the Care Plan was will have no complications related to indwelling catheter use. The interventions/tasks were as follows: Catheter care every shift. Educated resident and/or family regarding indwelling catheter care. On 7/3/24 a new intervention was added: observe for and document for pain/discomfort due to catheter. An interview on 8/13/24 at 1:00 PM with Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) revealed the current Care Plan had not been updated with the current information regarding the urinary catheter as the indwelling catheter had been discontinued on 6/12/24. B. Record review of Resident 68's Clinical Census dated 8/8/24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident 68's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 12. A BIMS score of 12 indicated the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. Resident 68 functional status for eating, transfer, bed mobility, and toileting was assessed as independent. Resident 68 had the following diagnosis listed on the MDS: Debility, cardiorespiratory conditions, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anxiety, depression, morbid obesity, atrial fibrillation, muscle weakness, and edema. The MDS revealed no skin issues. Record review of Wound Assessments for Resident 68 revealed the resident had open wounds beginning on 7/9/24 through present as follows: -7/12-left foot, right lower leg, and left lower leg. -7/19/24-left lower leg, left foot, right lower leg, and right foot. -7/26/24-Right lower leg front, left lower leg, and right foot. -8/2/24-left lower leg, right anterior lower leg, and right lower leg. -8/9/24-left lower leg, right anterior lower leg, and right lower leg. -8/12/24-right foot (new). Record review of Resident 68's Care Plan dated 6/8/2022 revealed a focus of skin integrity- Resident is at risk for break in skin integrity related to urinary incontinence and xerosis cutis. The goal for the care plan was Resident will maintain intact skin with no skin breaks through the next review period. Resident 68's Care Plan did not identify the wounds on Resident 68's legs. Interview with Wound Nurse (WN) on 8/13/24 at 12:30 PM revealed the WN did not update the Care Plan with open wounds on bilateral legs that had began on 7/9/24. D. Record Review of Resident 14's MDS dated [DATE] revealed an admission date of 11-29-2019 and a readmission date of 03-28-2024. Diagnosis that were listed on the MDS were Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD, is a systemic disorder that involves the narrowing of peripheral blood vessels), Cerebrovascular Disease (is a term for conditions that affect blood flow to your brain) with hemiphegia (weakness) on the left side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dysarthria (slurred speech), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, prevents airflow to the lungs, causing breathing problems.), and morbid obesity, The MDS also revealed Resident 14 had a BIMS score of 14 and required supervision with oral hygiene and eating, partial assistance with personal hygiene, substantial assistance with showering and upper body dressing and was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, lower body dressing and toileting. The MDS also indicated Resident 14 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. An observation on 08-08-2024 at 10:35 AM of Resident 14 revealed an oral cavity absent of teeth. Record Review of Resident 14's care plan printed on 08-08-2024 revealed Resident 14 had oral/dental health problems related to no teeth and bottom dentures do not fit. Resident 14's care plan identified Resident 14's dentures were currently at home. The care plan also revealed interventions the staff put into place for dental care are as follows: -Coordinate arrangements for dental care, transportation as needed/as ordered. -Diet as ordered. Consult with dietician as needed. -FEES Swallow study. -Instructed to have son bring dentures from home. -Observe and report as needed for any signs of oral/dental problems needing attention. -Provide mouth care daily. Record Review of the facility policy Resident Assessment Instrument and Care Plan Development dated 08-22-2023 revealed the facility will follow the procedures set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual 3.0 when completing the MDS, Care Area Assessment, and Comprehensive Care Plan. The policy also revealed the comprehensive care plan must be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. During an interview conducted on 08-13-2024 at 10:36 AM with the Social Service Assistant (SSA) confirmed Resident 14's care plan was not accurate and outdated. C. Record review of Resident 34's Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified the admission date of 1/26/2024 and that Resident 34 had a feeding tube. Resident 34's diagnosis are identified on the MDS as Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage (bleeding in the gastrointestinal tract), Esophagitis (Inflammation of the esophagus), Dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). Record review of Resident 34's Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) dated 8/8/2024 revealed Resident 34 received tube feeding via pump from 5:00 PM to 9:00 AM daily of Osmolite (nutritional formula) of 1.5 cal Formula standard (FS) at 50 milliliters (ml)/hour with 25 cubic centimeter (cc) purified water flush every hour while on pump. Further review of Resident 34's CC dated 8/8/2024 revealed the facility staff were to elevate Resident 34's Head of Bed (HOB) 45 degrees and was to received nothing by mouth. Record review of Resident 34's Order Summary Report with active orders as of 8/8/2024 revealed Resident 34's diet order was to have pureed texture (blended to a smoothie texture) with thin consistency for pleaser feeding of 4 oz pureed at lunch. In addition Resident 34's practitioner ordered Resident 34 to have tube feedings, 4 times a day of Osmolite 1.2 cal per cc with the administration of 237 (milliliter) ml for each feeding via bolus ( a single large dose of formula). Resident 34's Order Summary Report directed Resident 34 HOB be elevated at least 30 degrees. Observation on 8/12/24 at 9:30 AM with LPN-O revealed LPN-O checked placement of Resident 34's feeding tube. Further observation of LPN-O completing a residual check (ensuring the stomach is not retaining the previous bolus) and flush to ensure the tube is patent in preperation for medication administration. Interview on 8/08/2024 at 12:00 PM with the facility Registered Dietician ( RD) verified the order was correct for Resident 34 to receive bolus feedings via tube ( Four times a day) QID with a 60 ml flush before and after the bolus of Osmolite. Interview on 8/13/2024 at 12:37 PM MDS Nurse confirmed that Resident 34's CCP was not up to date related to orders for bolus feedings and not continuous feeding identified on the care plan. Record review of the Facility policy titled Resident Assessment Instrument & Care Plan Development dated 8/22/2023. Policy states; The facility will follow the procedures set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual 3.0 when completing the MDS, Care Area Assessment, and Comprehensive Care Plan. Procedure : #9 The RAI is not all inclusive therefore other sources of information are to be included when developing an individualized person[centered care plan for each patient that is reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) with each assessment including the patient and other participants as the patient desires.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1.009.04(D) Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure safe water tempe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1.009.04(D) Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure safe water temperatures in resident bathrooms for rooms 101, 102, 109,113, 114, 117, 118, 120,122 and 123. This had the ability to affect 14 of the residents that reside at the facility. The facility census was 86. Findings are: Observation on 08-07-2024 at 9:00 AM of resident rooms revealed water temperatures in resident bathrooms were as follows: -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 132.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F). -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 131 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 126.5 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 125.4 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 129.4 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] of 124.9 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] 124.3 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] 123.4 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] 125.1 degrees F. -room [ROOM NUMBER] 124.5 degrees F. An interview was conducted with the facility Maintenance Supervisor (MS) on 07-08-2024 at 10:00 AM revealing the MS had taken a water temperature in room [ROOM NUMBER] that was above 124 degrees F. An interview was conducted on 07-08-2024 at 11:30 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) During the interview the DON reported the water in the bathrooms on 100 Hall were too high, with the water being shut off. Record Review of the facility's Direct Supply TELS (is a building management platform designed for Senior Living with integrated Asset Management, Life Safety, and Maintenance solutions) logbook documentation for testing and logging water temperatures revealed to test water temperatures at various locations throughout the facility, with these areas being of primary focus: -Ensure laundry water temperatures are between 120-140-degrees F, unless you are using a chemical sanitizer. -Ensure dietary temperatures are at least 140 degrees F with the wash cycle at 160-180 degrees F and rinse cycle at 180-195 degrees F, unless using a chemical sanitizer. -For burn prevention, federal guidelines advise that you keep domestic water temperatures below 120 degrees F and 100 degrees F for bathing.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** F. Record review of Resident 68's Clinical Census revealed an admission date of 5/27/2022. Record review of Resident 68's MDS r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** F. Record review of Resident 68's Clinical Census revealed an admission date of 5/27/2022. Record review of Resident 68's MDS revealed Resident 68 had a BIMS of 12. A BIMS of 12 indicated that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident 68 was independent with bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting. Record review of Resident 68's Wound Assessments dated 7/12/24 revealed the resident had venous stasis ulcer wounds with serous drainage (a clean, thin, and watery fluid that leaks from a wound that has tissue damage). The Wound Assessment documented the venous stasis ulcers were found on 7/9/24. Observation of Resident 68's door on 8/7/24 leading to the resident's room revealed no signage for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). Observation of Resident 68's door on 8/8/24 leading to the resident's room revealed no signage for EBP. Observation of Resident 68's door on 8/12/24 leading to the resident's room revealed no signage for EBP. Interview with Infection Preventionist (IP) on 08/13/24 at 10:28 AM, IP confirmed (gender) was unaware that resident had open weeping wounds since 7/9/24. IP also confirmed that Resident 68 should have EBP signage on the door to (gender) room to alert staff of the need for precautions to prevent the spread of infection. Record review of EBP policy dated 6/3/2024 revealed: the facility should use EBP as an additional MDRO mitigation strategy for residents that meet the following criteria, during high-contact resident care activities. EBP are indicated for resident with any of the following: 1. Infection or colonization with a CDC-targeted MDRO when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply; or 2. Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO. a. Wounds generally include chronic wounds, not shorter-lasting wounds, such as skin breaks or skin tears covered with an adhesive bandage or similar dressing. Examples of chronic wounds include, but are not limited to pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds, and venous stasis ulcers. b. Indwelling medical device examples include central lines, urinary catheter, feeding tubes, and tracheostomies. A peripheral intravenous line (not a peripherally inserted central catheter) is not considered an indwelling medical device for the purpose of EBP. Procedure The facility should develop a process to communicate which residents require the use of EBP for all high-contact resident care activities. The facility may choose to post signage on the door or wall outside of the resident room indicating the resident is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions D. Record Review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 06-28-2024 revealed an admission date of 06-25-2024 following hospitalization for surgery of a diaphragmatic Hernia with Obstruction (is a protrusion of abdominal contents into the thoracic cavity due to a defect within the diaphragm), other diagnosis included Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD, is a long-term condition that occurs when stomach acid flows back up into the esophagus), Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH, a non-cancerous condition that causes the prostate gland to enlarge in men), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Barrett's Esophagus (is a condition in which the flat pink lining of the swallowing tube that connects the mouth to the stomach (esophagus) becomes damaged by acid reflux, which causes the lining to thicken and become red) with dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and an indwelling urinary catheter(is a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder through the urethra or stomach wall to collect and drain urine). The MDS also indicated Resident 37 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment that aids in detecting cognitive impairment. A score of 0-7 equals severe impairment, 8-12 indicates moderate impairment and 13-15 indicates cognitively intact) score of 15 and required set up assistance from staff for oral and personal hygiene, partial assistance for dressing, substantial assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for bathing and transfers. The MDS also revealed Resident 14 weighed 120 pounds and was 64 inches tall. An observation on 08-12-2024 at 4:10 AM of Medication Aid (MA) D entering Resident 37's room revealed a sign on the outside of the door stating Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The sign indicated that staff should wear a gown and gloves during the following High Contact Resident Care Activities -device care or use of a urinary catheter. MA D entered the room without a gown, went to the bathroom performed hand hygiene and returned from the bathroom wearing gloves, carrying a graduate. MA D set the graduate on the floor, opened the spigot on the catheter drainage bag and drained the bag into the graduate. After the emptying the drainage bag, MA D placed the spigot back into the holder on the bag and took the graduate into the bathroom and discarded the urine in the toilet. MA performed removed gloves performed hand hygiene and left the room. An interview conducted with MA D on 08-12-2024 at 4:29 AM confirmed that a gown was not worn while draining Resident 37's catheter bag because Resident 37 is no longer on precautions. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) I on 08-12-2024 at 5:05 AM revealed Resident 37 was on EBP for a urinary catheter. Record Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 03-21-2024 revealed a policy statement- The facility should use EBP as an additional Multi Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) mitigation strategy for residents that meet the following criteria, during high contact resident care activities: EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: -Infection or colonization with a Centers of Disease Control (CDC)-targeted MDRO when contact precautions do not otherwise apply; or -Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO. -wounds include chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers and diabetic foot wounds. -indwelling medical device examples include central lines, urinary catheters, and feeding tubes. An interview with the facility Wound Nurse (WN) on 08-12-2024 at 5:10 AM confirmed that a gown should have been worn by the staff when emptying a urinary catheter drainage bag. E. Record Review of Resident 14's MDS dated [DATE] revealed an admission date of 11-29-2019 and a readmission date of 03-28-2024. Diagnosis that were listed on the MDS were Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD, is a systemic disorder that involves the narrowing of peripheral blood vessels), Cerebrovascular Disease (is a term for conditions that affect blood flow to your brain) with hemiphegia (weakness) on the left side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dysarthria (slurred speech), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, prevents airflow to the lungs, causing breathing problems.), and morbid obesity, The MDS also revealed Resident 14 had a BIMS score of 14 and required supervision with oral hygiene and eating, partial assistance with personal hygiene, substantial assistance with showering and upper body dressing and was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, lower body dressing and toileting. The MDS also indicated Resident 14 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. An observation on 08-13-2024 at 7:01 AM revealed an EBP sign outside Resident 14's room indicating staff should wear a gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities such as bathing, transferring, dressing, or providing hygiene. This observation after entering the room revealed Nurse Aid (NA) D, NA G and NA F were wearing gloves but not gowns while transferring Resident 14 out of the shower chair and back into bed. NA G was using a mechanical lift to transfer Resident 14 into bed while NA D was guiding the resident while the lift was moved from the shower chair to the bed, and NA F was collecting linens from the bath chair and the bed. An interview with NA D, NA G and NA F on 08-13-2024 at 7:01 AM confirmed when Resident 14 returned to the room after the shower the nurse aids should have donned gowns and gloves before transferring and providing care to Resident 14. Record Review of the facilities Weekly EBP Update dated 08-07-2024 listed Resident 14 on EBP for wounds. Record Review of the facility policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 03-21-2024 revealed a policy statement- The facility should use EBP as an additional Multi Drug Resistant Organism (MDRO) mitigation strategy for residents that meet the following criteria, during high contact resident care activities: EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: -Infection or colonization with a Centers of Disease Control (CDC)-targeted MDRO when contact precautions do not otherwise apply; or -Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO. -wounds include chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers and diabetic foot wounds. -indwelling medical device examples include central lines, urinary catheters, and feeding tubes. An interview on 08-13-2024 at 7:40 AM with Registered Nurse J confirmed that staff are to wear a gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities for residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices. Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B) Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(C) Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ensure Resident 26, 38, and 42's respiratory equipment and supplies was cleaned and sanitized to prevent cross contamination, failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions during ADL care for Resident 14, and during catheter care for Resident 37, and failed to provide enhanced barrier signage for 1, Resident 68. The total sample size of the survey was 18. The facility staff identified a census of 86. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)/Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)(machines used to treat apnea) Administration Policy with a reviewed date of 09/26/2023 masks should be cleaned with soap and water as needed. A record review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy with a revised date of 02/27/2024 revealed the exterior of the oxygen concentrators (a machine that purifies oxygen) should be cleaned weekly. A record review of the facility's Nebulizer (Neb) Treatment (device used to administer liquid medications to the lungs), small volume policy with a last reviewed date of 05/29/2024 revealed the facility should rinse the nebulizer with sterile water and allow it to air dry or discard after the treatment. An observation on 08/08/2023 at 3:21 PM revealed Resident 26's neb kit was in a plastic bag, but the mask had facial oils on it and there was a residual (leftover) amount of medication in the cup. The resident Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) mask was draped over the over-bed table with facial oils on it. The PAP filter was coated with a gray fuzzy substance, and all the machines had a gray fuzzy substance on them. An observation on 08/12/2023 at 10:04 AM revealed Resident 26's neb kit was on the floor and the mask had facial oils on it and there was a residual amount of medication in the cup. The resident's PAP mask was draped over the over-bed table with facial oils and a white coating on it. The PAP filter was coated with a gray fuzzy substance, and all the machines had a gray fuzzy substance on them. An observation on 08/12/2023 at 2:20 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-N revealed Resident 26's PAP mask was draped over the over-bed table with facial oils and a white coating on it. The PAP filter was coated with a gray fuzzy substance, and all the machines had a gray fuzzy substance on them. In an interview on 08/12/2024 at 10:14 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the DON seen the nebulizer kit on the floor and threw it away. It should not have been on the floor. In an interview on 08/12/2024 at 2:20 PM, LPN-N confirmed the resident's PAP mask should been clean, the PAP filter should be clean, and the surfaces of the units should be clean, and they were not. B. An observation on 08/07/2023 at 2:06 PM revealed Resident 42's nebulizer kit was in a plastic bag, but the mask had facial oils on it and there was a residual amount of medication in the cup. The resident ventilator mask was in a plastic bag with facial oils on it. The resident's ventilator had a gray fuzzy substance and debris on it. The air intake on the concentrator was coated with a gray fuzzy substance, and all the machines had a gray fuzzy substance on them. An observation on 08/08/2023 at 3:22 PM revealed Resident 42's nebulizer kit was in a plastic bag, but the mask had facial oils on it and there was a residual amount of medication in the cup. The resident ventilator mask was in a plastic bag with facial oils on it. The resident's ventilator had a gray fuzzy substance and debris on it. The air intake on the concentrator was coated with a gray fuzzy substance, and all the machines had a gray fuzzy substance on them. An observation on 08/12/2023 at 2:55 PM with LPN-N revealed Resident 42's nebulizer kit was in a plastic bag, but the mask had facial oils on it and there was a residual amount of medication in the cup. The resident ventilator mask was in a plastic bag with facial oils and debris on it. The resident's ventilator had a gray fuzzy substance and debris on it. The air intake on the concentrator was coated with a gray fuzzy substance, and all the machines had a gray fuzzy substance on them. In an interview on 08/12/2024 at 2:55 PM, LPN-N confirmed the resident's PAP mask and nebulizer kit should be clean, the concentrators air intake should be clean, and the surfaces of the units should be clean, and they were not. A record review of the facility's BiPAP/CPAP Administration Policy with a reviewed date of 09/26/2023 masks should be cleaned with soap and water as needed. A record review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy with a revised date of 02/27/2024 revealed the exterior of the oxygen concentrators should be cleaned weekly. A record review of the facility's Nebulizer Treatment, small volume policy with a last reviewed date of 05/29/2024 revealed the facility should rinse the nebulizer with sterile water and allow it to air dry or discard after the treatment. C. An observation on 08/12/2024 at 7:42 AM revealed Resident 38's PAP mask had facial oils and debris on it, the PAP headgear had a large brown dried mark on it, the nebulizer machine had brown stains and hair on it, the PAP filter had a thick gray fuzzy substance on it. The PAP and concentrator had a gray fuzzy coating on them. An observation on 08/12/2024 at 2:30 PM with LPN-P revealed Resident 38's PAP mask had facial oils and debris on it, the PAP headgear had a large brown dried mark on it, the nebulizer machine had brown stains and hair on it, the PAP filter had a thick gray fuzzy substance on it. The PAP and concentrator had a gray fuzzy coating on them. In an interview on 08/12/2024 at 7:42 AM Resident 38 confirmed the staff did not clean the resident's respiratory equipment and supplies. In an interview on 08/12/2024 at 2:30 PM, LPN-P confirmed all the equipment and supplies were not clean and should have been. A record review of the facility's BiPAP/CPAP Administration Policy with a reviewed date of 09/26/2023 masks should be cleaned with soap and water as needed. A record review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy with a revised date of 02/27/2024 revealed the exterior of the oxygen concentrators should be cleaned weekly.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(B) Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to maintain flooring in good repair for 12 resident rooms. This had the potential ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(B) Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to maintain flooring in good repair for 12 resident rooms. This had the potential to affect 13 residents. The facility identified a census of 86. Findings are: A record review of the Facility policy titled Resident Belongings and Home Like environment, dated 06/12/2024. The policy states the facility will provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment. The policy included a section titled The facility must provide-This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. A tour with Mantenence Suppervisior (MS) on 8/13/2024 at 11:20 AM revealed 104, 105, 106, 108, 109, 111, 113, 114, 121, and 122. rooms did not have a transition strip between the hall carpet and the flooring in the resident's room. A tour with MS on 8/13/24 at 11:20 AM revealed 104, 113, 114, 122, 123, and 207 resident rooms had cracked or bubbled linoleum in the resident's bathroom. An interview with MS on 8/13/2024 at 11:45 AM confirmed the resident room floors were not maintained and could potentially be a safety concern.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food items in the kitchen's refrigerators and freezers were sealed...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E) Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food items in the kitchen's refrigerators and freezers were sealed, labeled, and dated, ensure food preparation (prep) was completed in a sanitary manner and per the menu, and ensure all kitchen equipment was cleaned to prevent foodborne illness. This had the potential to affect all 86 resident that consumed food from the kitchen. Findings are: A. A record review of the facility's Food Safety policy dated 05/01/2024 revealed all leftovers must be covered, labeled, and dated. An observation on 08/07/2024 at 7:03 AM revealed the following: The reach-in refrigerator in the kitchen: -1 open bag of a purple shredded substance was not sealed, labeled, or dated. -1 open zip lock style bag of a white chunk was not sealed or labeled. -1 bag of yellow slices not sealed. -1 clear cup of a liquid substance not sealed, labeled, or dated. -1 large zip lock style bag of a shredded green substance not labeled or dated. -1 opened package of bologna not sealed or dated. -1 open box of an iced carrot sheet cake not sealed or dated. The dry storage contained: -2 open bags macaroni not sealed or dated. -1 box very soft bananas with large black soft areas on them. The walk-in refrigerator contained: -1 zip lock style bag with yellow slices not labled or dated. -4 watermelons on bottom shelf with dark brown spots scatter through the surfaces. The walk-in freezer contained: -1 zip lock style bag of brown and white strips not labeled or dated. -1 bag green chunks not labeled or dated. An observation on 08/07/2024 at 7:41 AM with the Director of Food Services (DFS) revealed the DFS observed all the above listed items. In an interview on 08/07/2024 at 7:41 AM, the DFS confirmed that all items in the facility's refrigerators and freezers should have been sealed, labeled, or dated. B. An observation on 08/08/2024 at 8:41 AM revealed Cook-M opened 1 large packages of beef and squeezed it into a large steam pan and placed the package steam pan number 1 with the food product and repeated the process with another package in steam pan number 1. Cook-M then squeezed 2 large packages of beef into steam pan number 2 and placed the package in the steam pan with the food product allowing the outside of the product wrapper to come in contact with the exposed beef. Cook-M then used the same gloves that Cook-M used to touch the outside of the beef packages to break up the beef in the 2 steam pans. During the food prep observation Cook-M did not use the recipe and did not measure the onion soup mix added to each steam pan. In an interview on 08/08/2024 at 8:57 AM, Cook-M confirmed that Cook-M did not use the recipe or measure the onion soup mix during food prep. Cook-M confirmed that Cook-M has done it so many times Cook-M just knows the recipe. In an interview on 08/08/2024 at 12:14 PM, the DFS confirmed that Cook-M should not have allowed the outside of the beef packages to come in contact with the food product. In an interview on 08/08/2024 at 12:35 PM, the Registered Dietician, (RD) confirmed that Cook-M should have followed the recipe and measure the onion soup mix placed in each pan. C. A record review of the facility's Sanitization and Maintenance policy with a reviewed date of 04/30/2024 revealed physical facilities were to be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. A record review of the Daily Cleaning log sheets dated 07/28/2024 - 08/03/2024 did not reveal that the floors were cleaned every shift. A record review of the Monthly Cleaning log sheets dated June and July 2024 did not reveal the vents and fans were cleaned. An observation on 08/07/2024 at 7:03 AM revealed: -The kitchen floors had crumbs throughout the kitchen -The vent on the bottom of the reach-in freezer contained brown drippings and white debris -The Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) vents above the steam table and plate warmer had a loose, gray, fuzzy substance on the surfaces and along the edge. The plates in the plate warmer were upright and open food items were on the steam table. -The dry storage floor had white flakes and food debris scattered throughout -The back door and door handle had a black substance on the surface -The handle to the walk-in refrigerator had a black substance on it -The floors in the walk-in refrigerator had scattered debris throughout -The vents above the sanitizer were coated with a brown fuzzy substance An observation on 08/07/2024 at 7:41 AM with the DFS revealed the DFS seen all the above listed concerns. In an interview on 08/08/2024 at 9:21 AM, the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) confirmed maintenance was not responsible for cleaning the vents on the inside above the kitchen and confirmed they were not clean. In an interview on 08/08/2024 at 9:32 AM, the DFS confirmed the DFS did not even know there were vents above the sanitizer and confirmed they have not been cleaned. The DFS confirmed there was a gray fuzzy substance on the HVAC vents and hanging from the edge above the plate warmer and steam table and there was a potential it could dislodge in the food on the steam table or on the eating surfaces on the plates on the plate warmer. In an interview on 08/08/2024 at 8:41 AM, the DFS confirmed all the above listed items were not clean and should have been.
Jul 2023 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to Resident #84 to ensure that no bowel movement r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to Resident #84 to ensure that no bowel movement remained on the resident before starting to put a new incontience brief on the resident. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention, dated 05/04/2023, indicated, If diarrhea develops or if the patient is incontinent, follow these steps: Change underpads and briefs after soiling; and clean the skin with a no-rinse skin cleanser that has pH [acidity] similar to normal skin. A policy that specifically addressed incontinence care was requested but not provided. A review of Resident #84's admission Record revealed the facility initially admitted the resident on 10/26/2022 and readmitted the resident on 11/11/2022 with diagnoses that included malignant poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, protein-calorie malnutrition, end stage renal disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/14/2023, revealed Resident #84 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident required extensive assistance from staff with toilet use and personal hygiene. The MDS indicated the resident was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. A review of Resident #84's Care Plan focus statement, with an initiation date of 10/29/2022, indicated the resident was incontinent of bowel. Interventions/tasks directed staff to assist with toileting as needed (initiated on 10/29/2022) and provide incontinence care after each incontinence episode (initiated on 11/01/2022). During an observation on 07/13/2023 at 5:07 AM, incontinence care was provided for Resident #84. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) T provided the incontinence care. When the resident was turned and their adult brief was unfastened, a small amount of bowel movement was observed. CNA T wiped the rectal area three times and then removed the resident's soiled brief. Bowel movement was still observed on the resident. CNA T placed a new brief on the resident and started to secure the brief when the surveyor asked CNA T about cleansing the resident's perineal area. CNA T wiped the resident's perineal area from the front toward the anus and when the wipe was removed it contained a brown colored substance. CNA T indicated the resident was not clean. CNA T used three more cleansing wipes before the resident was clean. CNA T applied and secured a new adult brief. During an interview on 07/13/2023 at 5:27 AM, CNA T revealed the procedure for incontinence care if a resident had a bowel movement was to cleanse the resident until nothing was observed on the cleansing wipes. CNA T acknowledged that Resident #84 was not completely clean when they first attempted to apply a new adult brief and stated that could cause a urinary tract infection. During an interview on 07/13/2023 at 5:36 AM, CNA U stated the process was to ensure all bowel movement was removed during incontinence care to prevent infections. During an interview on 07/13/2023 at 5:45 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) V stated not properly cleansing the area of bowel movement could cause skin breakdown and infection. During an interview on 07/14/2023 at 3:03 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated their expectation when incontinence care was provided was that staff wipe from front to back until the resident receiving care was clean. The DON stated there should be nothing left on the resident when a clean adult brief is applied.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #9), who was not a candidate for self-administrati...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #9), who was not a candidate for self-administration, did not have a medication brought into the facility by a family member available for use at the resident's bedside. Findings included: A review of Resident #9's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/20/2022 with diagnoses that included enterocolitis, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), peripheral venous insufficiency, heart disease, spontaneous migraine, typical atrial flutter, gastroenteritis and colitis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), chronic kidney disease, long-term use of anticoagulants, and history of malignant neoplasm of the large intestine (colon cancer). The admission Record indicated the resident had a pacemaker. A review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/21/2023, revealed Resident #9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident required supervision with set-up assistance from staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) except bathing, which required extensive assistance. A review of Resident #9's Care Plan focus statement, with a revision date of 08/25/2022, indicated the resident had hypertension and received antihypertensive medications and had a pacemaker related to atrial fibrillation and was on anticoagulant therapy. The Care Plan did not indicate that family members brought in medication for resident use or indicate the resident self-administered medication. A review of Resident #9's Order Summary Report indicated the resident received acetaminophen (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication), Apixaban (an anticoagulant medication), propranolol (a cardiac medication for atrial fibrillation), and torsemide (a diuretic for edema). During an interview with Resident #9 on 07/11/2023 at 11:12 AM, a bottle of Aleve (a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication) was observed on the resident's bedside table. The resident stated a relative had provided the Aleve (220 milligram tablets) for them because the facility would not. The resident stated they were currently taking anticoagulant medications and had no complications from them. On 07/12/2023 at 3:30 PM, the bottle of Aleve was observed on Resident #9's bedside table. During an interview with Resident #9 on 07/13/2023 at 7:52 AM, the Aleve was observed on the resident's bedside table. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C, who accompanied the surveyor, noticed it right away, picked up the bottle, and stated the resident was taking Apixaban and should not take Aleve with that medication. LPN C stated residents who were taking anticoagulant medications should not take Aleve and added that the facility did not provide Aleve to residents. LPN C stated the resident should not have the medication in their room and said a visitor must have brought it in for the resident. During a telephone interview on 07/13/2023 at 12:20 PM, the Nurse Practitioner (NP) assigned to Resident #9 stated Resident #9 was taking Apixaban, propranolol, furosemide, and psychotropic medications. The NP indicated the resident was not a candidate for self-administration of medication. The NP stated with the resident's history of gastrointestinal problems and use of anticoagulant medications they would not recommend Aleve for Resident #9. The NP stated they did not prescribe Aleve for residents who resided in the facility. During an interview on 07/14/2023 at 12:32 PM, the Executive Director (ED) stated education was provided to family members about not bringing in outside medications for residents because the facility required evaluation, monitoring, and orders for medications and supplements. The ED said Resident #9 should not have Aleve at the bedside due to safety concerns and indicated the resident was on anticoagulant medication and had no orders to self-administer medications. During a telephone interview on 07/14/2023 at 2:02 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated education was provided to family members about the importance of not providing outside medications to residents, but some family members brought them to the facility anyway and nursing staff confiscated the medication when found. The DON stated visitors had brought Resident #9 medications in the past which had been confiscated. The DON stated Resident #9 did not have an order to self-administer medications and should not have Aleve at their bedside.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** D. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #53 on 11/02/2021 with diagnoses that included anxi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** D. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #53 on 11/02/2021 with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, mood disorder, restlessness, and agitation. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/12/2022, revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #53 had other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others four to six days during the assessment period. The MDS indicated the resident used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident #53's Care Plan focus statement, with an initiation date of 11/18/2022, indicated the resident had a behavior problem related to agitation and hoarding. Interventions directed staff to intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others, approach and speak in a calm manner, divert attention, remove the resident from the situation and take the resident to an alternate location as needed. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #66 on 07/01/2022 with diagnoses that included left hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/07/2022, revealed Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS did not indicate Resident #66 had physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms. The MDS indicated the resident used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident #66's Care Plan focus statement, with an initiation date of 06/01/2023, indicated the resident had impaired cognitive ability and impaired thought processes. The Care Plan did not indicate the resident had behavioral symptoms. Review of a document titled, Facility Verification of Investigation, dated 10/08/2022, revealed that on 10/04/2022 at 1:53 PM, Resident #66 was exiting the dining room, noticed food on their shirt, stopped and grabbed a napkin to clean it off, and accidently dropped the napkin. Resident #53 was also exiting the dining room and saw Resident #66 drop the napkin. Resident #53 told Resident #66 not to throw things on the floor in the dining room. As Resident #66 attempted to pick up the napkin, Resident #53 kicked Resident #66's wheelchair. Resident #53 left the dining room, then returned and threatened Resident #66 stating, I will be watching you. Nursing staff notified the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Executive Director (ED). The Facility Verification of Investigation indicated the state survey agency was notified by telephone of the abuse allegation on 10/04/2022 at 1:53 PM. During an interview on 07/13/2023 at 8:09 AM, the ED stated they phoned the state survey agency to initially report the resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #53 and Resident #66. The ED stated they had no documentation indicating that the 5-day investigation report was sent to the state survey agency. During a phone interview on 07/14/2023 at 2:02 PM, the DON stated they thought they completed the 5-day investigation report; however, the DON did not know if the investigation report was sent to the state survey agency. During interview on 07/14/2023 at 4:12 PM, the ED stated the 5-day investigation report was not submitted to the state agency as required. C. A review of Resident #57's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/17/2020 with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis of the lumbar region (spinal narrowing of the lumbar region), adult failure to thrive, polyneuropathy, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/06/2023, revealed Resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS revealed the resident had physical and verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others and refused care daily, and had behavioral symptoms not directed toward others four to six days during the assessment period. The MDS indicated the resident was totally dependent on two-person physical assistance for transfers, required extensive one-person assistance with bed mobility, locomotion, dressing, incontinence care, personal hygiene, and bathing, and was independent with one-person physical assistance with eating. The MDS indicated the resident used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident #57's Care Plan revealed a focus statement, with a revision date of 10/12/2020, which indicated the resident had the potential to be physically aggressive toward staff related to anger and poor impulse control. A Care Plan focus statement, with a revision date of 11/03/2021, revealed the resident was resistive to care and very staff selective related to adjustment to nursing home. Interventions and tasks for this focus statement indicated staff were to document the resident's behavioral symptoms including agitation, false beliefs (not further defined), hallucinations, delusions/paranoia, mood changes and being rude to staff. A review of Resident #57's Care Plan revealed a focus statement, with a revision date of 08/22/2022, which indicated the resident had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, chronic pain, failure to thrive, ambulatory dysfunction, and physical deconditioning, and was frequently incontinent. Another Care Plan focus statement, with a revision date of 08/22/2022, indicated the resident had the potential to be verbally aggressive related to ineffective coping skills and poor impulse control. Interventions and tasks for this focus statement indicated that two care givers were to be present when the resident was agitated. An additional Care Plan focus statement, with a revision date of 08/22/2022, indicated the resident had a communication deficit related to dementia with behavioral disturbance. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 10:17 AM, Resident #57 stated they felt abused by staff who assisted them on 06/15/2023. Resident #57 stated they had reported their concern to a nurse when a certified nurse aide (CNA) told me I could wipe my own [expletive], but the nurse brushed me off. The resident stated they spoke with management who took the same stance and they felt brushed off [ignored]. The complainant stated facility management had spoken with them on 06/15/2023 about what was said and what happened that day, but the complainant was not sure if anything else was done. A review of Resident #57's Progress Notes revealed no documentation of the resident's allegation of staff verbal abuse on 06/15/2023 and no description of the events that occurred that day. A review of the Incidents by Incident Type log, dated July 2022 through July 2023, revealed no incident report of the allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse filed on behalf of Resident #57. A review of the grievances for June 2023 revealed no grievance of staff to resident abuse filed on behalf of Resident #57. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E on 07/13/2023 at 10:47 AM, LPN E stated Resident #57 reported a staff member had told them to wipe their own [expletive]. They stated they knew CNA H had worked with Resident #57 several times and the CNA did not have the skills needed to handle resident behavioral symptoms. LPN E said CNA H tried to argue or engage with residents when they were upset, which did not work with Resident #57. LPN E stated they spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON) about some of the things that occurred on 06/15/2023 but did not recall if they told the DON about the allegation of verbal abuse made by the resident. A review of the All Staff Meeting documentation, dated 02/24/2023, revealed training was provided regarding reporting of abuse and neglect allegations. The training summary for reporting of abuse and neglect allegations indicated, Please ensure that if you have a resident that alleges abuse, whether it be physical, verbal, sexual, financial, or any other form of abuse that you contact the DON [Director of Nursing] or ED [Executive Director] immediately upon hearing of the allegation. We must report these incidents within two hours after being made aware, so we need staff to call us as soon as an allegation is made. Fifty-five staff members signed the attendance sheet for the All Staff Meeting; 32 of the staff members were nursing floor staff and included LPN E. During an interview with the Executive Director (ED) on 07/13/2023 at 12:57 PM, they stated no staff member came forward to report verbal abuse on behalf of Resident #57 in June 2023 or at any other time. The ED said no staff member reported that the resident was told to wipe their own [expletive]. The ED said if that had been reported to the ED or the DON, an investigation into verbal abuse would have been initiated. The ED stated they had no file or documentation of an incident on 06/15/2023. During an interview with LPN C on 07/13/2023 at 2:19 PM, LPN C stated Resident #57 had not told them about a staff member making an abusive comment and they would not have tolerated a staff member saying something like that to a resident. LPN C stated if they had heard the resident state this, they would have reported it to the DON and ED immediately. LPN C stated it would not surprise them if CNA H had made that statement to Resident #57. They stated CNA H was scared to death to go into the resident's room, would do anything to get out of caring for Resident #57, and had no clue as to how to handle the resident's behaviors. They stated CNA H was no longer employed with the facility. During a follow-up interview with LPN E on 07/13/2023 at 2:31 PM, they stated LPN C was in the room with them when they heard the resident make the allegation against CNA H. They stated since LPN C was in the room, and was the charge nurse, LPN E did not report what was said to anyone. During a telephone interview with the DON on 07/14/2023 at 2:02 PM, they stated staff who received or heard of an allegation of abuse were to report it immediately so an investigation could be initiated. The DON stated they were present on 06/15/2023 and had to assist the floor staff with Resident #57 because the resident was refusing care. The DON stated they received no report of the resident's allegation and said LPN C would have said something to them if LPN C was aware of the allegation. The DON stated LPN E did not report anything to the DON regarding the allegation either. Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report abuse allegations to the facility's Administrator and state survey agency within the required timeframe of two hours and failed to submit final investigation reports to the state survey agency within five working days of the occurrences involving 5 (Residents #39, #149, #57, #66, and #53) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Findings included: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Area of Focus: Abuse & Neglect, revealed, 483.12(c) In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: 483.12(c)(1) Ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long- term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures and 483.12(c)(4) Report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with state law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident. A. Record review of Resident #39's admission Record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF), type two diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident #39's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/16/2022, revealed Resident #39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Per the MDS, Resident #39 had no physical, verbal, or other behaviors. A review of Resident #39's Care Plan, initiated on 07/22/2019 and revised on 05/10/2023, indicated a potential risk for target behaviors related to depression, isolation, and sadness. The Care Plan directed staff to document any observed behaviors of agitation and rudeness to staff and residents and to refer to counseling as requested. B. A review of Resident #149's admission Record revealed Resident 149 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate). A review of an admission MDS, with an ARD of 01/10/2023, revealed Resident #149 had a BIMS score of 5, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Per the MDS, Resident #149 wandered and had physical, verbal, and other behavioral symptoms directed and not directed towards others daily. A review of Resident #149's Care Plan, initiated on 01/27/2023 and revised on 03/31/2023, indicated the resident had the potential for physically aggressive behaviors related to anger, dementia, and a history of harm to others. The Care Plan directed staff to administer medications as ordered, provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety, and observe and report any signs or symptoms of the resident posing a danger to themself or others as needed. A review of Resident #149's Progress Notes revealed a Behavior Note, dated 01/19/2023 at 9:19 PM, that indicated Resident #149 entered Resident #39's room, and when Resident #39 asked Resident #149 to leave their room, Resident #149 responded by kicking Resident #39. A review of Resident #149's Physician/Nurse Communication form, dated 01/19/2023 and completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, revealed Resident #149 entered other resident rooms and kicked Resident #39. A review of the Facility Verification of Investigation, dated 01/27/2023, indicated the state survey agency was notified of the abuse allegation on 01/20/2023 at 11:00 AM (which was approximately 14 hours after the incident occurred). According to the Facility Verification of Investigation, Resident #149 wandered into Resident #39's room and when Resident #39 asked Resident #149 to leave their room, Resident #149 kicked Resident #39. A review of an email, dated 01/27/2023, revealed the Director of Nursing (DON) submitted the 5-day investigation to the state survey agency on 01/27/2023 at 2:24 PM, six working days following LPN A's documentation of the incident in Resident #149's medical record. Calls were made to LPN A on 07/13/2023 at 2:03 PM and 07/14/2023 at 8:29 AM. Voicemails were left, but LPN A did not return the calls. During an interview on 07/14/2023 at 2:03 PM, the DON stated they expected staff to report any incidents or allegations of abuse to them immediately because they had to report it to Adult Protective Services (APS) within two hours of it occurring. During an interview on 07/14/2023 at 4:13 PM, the ED stated any allegation of abuse must be reported to APS within two hours, and the facility had five business days to complete the investigation and submit it to the state. Per the ED, LPN A did not report the incident to the DON or ED, so they were unaware until the next day. The ED then stated it was important to report allegations timely.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

2. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #53 on 11/02/2021 with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, mood disorder, restlessness, and agitation. A review of a q...

Read full inspector narrative →
2. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #53 on 11/02/2021 with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, mood disorder, restlessness, and agitation. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/12/2022, revealed Resident #53 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #53 had other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others four to six days during the assessment period. The MDS indicated the resident used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident #53's Care Plan focus statement, with an initiation date of 11/18/2022, indicated the resident had a behavior problem related to agitation and hoarding. Interventions directed staff to intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others, approach and speak in a calm manner, divert attention, remove the resident from the situation and take the resident to an alternate location as needed. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #66 on 07/01/2022 with diagnoses that included left hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/07/2022, revealed Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS did not indicate Resident #66 had physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms. The MDS indicated the resident used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident #66's Care Plan focus statement, with an initiation date of 06/01/2023, indicated the resident had impaired cognitive ability and impaired thought processes. The Care Plan did not indicate the resident had behavioral symptoms. Review of a document titled, Facility Verification of Investigation, that was dated 10/08/2022, revealed that on 10/04/2022 at 1:53 PM, Resident #66 was exiting the dining room, noticed food on their shirt, stopped and grabbed a napkin to clean it off, and accidently dropped the napkin. Resident #53 was also exiting the dining room and saw Resident #66 drop the napkin. Resident #53 told Resident #66 not to throw things on the floor in the dining room. As Resident #66 attempted to pick up the napkin, Resident #53 kicked Resident #66's wheelchair. Resident #53 left the dining room, then returned and threatened Resident #66 stating, I will be watching you. The document indicated the Director of Nursing (DON) and Executive Director (ED) were notified immediately; each resident was assessed, talked to and educated; and the residents were not to sit by each other in the dining room going forward. The Facility Verification of Investigation did not include staff or resident witness statements and no other residents were interviewed regarding resident-to-resident interactions. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 11:48 AM, the ED stated they had provided all of the investigation documents for the incident that involved Resident #53 and Resident #66. During a phone interview on 07/14/2023 at 2:02 PM, the DON stated they expected staff to obtain statements from anyone involved in an incident of abuse including staff who witnessed the incident. The DON said that if written statements were obtained, the statements would be in the Facility Verification of Investigation report. 3. A review of Resident #57's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/17/2020 with diagnoses that included spinal stenosis of the lumbar region (spinal narrowing of the lumbar region), adult failure to thrive, polyneuropathy, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/06/2023, revealed Resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS revealed the resident had physical and verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others and refused care daily, and had behavioral symptoms not directed toward others four to six days during the assessment period. The MDS indicated the resident was totally dependent on two-person physical assistance for transfers, required extensive one-person assistance with bed mobility, locomotion, dressing, incontinence care, personal hygiene, and bathing, and was independent with one-person physical assistance with eating. The MDS indicated the resident used a wheelchair for mobility. A review of Resident #57's Care Plan focus statement, with a revision date of 10/12/2020, indicated the resident had the potential to be physically aggressive toward staff related to anger and poor impulse control. A Care Plan focus statement, with a revision date of 11/03/2021, revealed the resident was resistive to care and very staff selective related to adjustment to nursing home. Interventions and tasks for this focus statement indicated staff were to document the resident's behavioral symptoms including agitation, false beliefs (not further defined), hallucinations, delusions/paranoia, mood changes and being rude to staff. A review of Resident #57's Care Plan focus statement, with a revision date of 08/22/2022, indicated the resident had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to activity intolerance, chronic pain, failure to thrive, ambulatory dysfunction, and physical deconditioning, and was frequently incontinent. Another Care Plan focus statement, with a revision date of 08/22/2022, indicated the resident had the potential to be verbally aggressive related to ineffective coping skills and poor impulse control. Interventions and tasks for this focus statement indicated that two care givers were to be present when the resident was agitated. A third Care Plan focus statement, with a revision date of 08/22/2022, indicated the resident had a communication deficit related to dementia with behavioral disturbance. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 10:17AM, Resident #57 stated they felt abused by staff who assisted them on 06/15/2023. Resident #57 stated they had reported their concern to a nurse when a certified nurse aide (CNA) told me I could wipe my own [expletive], but the nurse brushed me off. The resident stated they spoke with management who took the same stance and they felt brushed off [ignored]. The complainant stated facility management had spoken with them on 06/15/2023 about what was said and what happened that day, but the complainant was not sure if anything else was done. A review of Resident #57's Progress Notes revealed no documentation of the resident's allegation of staff verbal abuse on 06/15/2023 and no description of the events that occurred that day. Further review of Progress Notes from April 2022 through July 2023 revealed there were no notes regarding any abuse allegations made by the resident. A review of the Incidents by Incident Type log, dated July 2022 through July 2023, revealed no incident report of the allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse filed on behalf of Resident #57 on 06/15/2023. Further review of the Incidents by Incident Type log revealed there were no incident reports involving Resident #57. A review of the grievances for June 2023 revealed no grievance of staff to resident verbal abuse filed on behalf of Resident #57. Grievances were also reviewed for July 2022 through July 2023 and there were no grievances filed on behalf of Resident #57. During an interview with LPN E on 07/13/2023 at 10:47 AM, LPN E stated Resident #57 reported a staff member had told them to wipe their own [expletive]. They stated they knew CNA H had worked with Resident #57 several times and the CNA did not have the skills needed to handle resident behavioral symptoms. LPN E said CNA H tried to argue or engage with residents when they were upset, which did not work with Resident #57. LPN E stated they spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON) about some of the things that occurred on 06/15/2023 but did not recall if they told the DON about the allegation of verbal abuse made by the resident. During an interview with the Executive Director (ED) on 07/13/2023 at 12:57 PM, they stated no staff member came forward to report verbal abuse on behalf of Resident #57 in June 2023 or at any other time. The ED said, no staff member reported that the resident was told to wipe their own [expletive]. The ED said if that had been reported to the ED or the DON, an investigation into verbal abuse would have been initiated. The ED stated Resident #57 claimed abuse all the time, making multiple false allegations against staff members as well as being verbally and physically abusive to the nursing staff. The ED stated they had no file or documentation from the incident on 06/15/2023. During an interview with the ED on 07/14/2023 at 12:32 PM, they stated they had been the executive director for two years. They stated an abuse investigation would be initiated immediately after receiving an allegation of any kind of abuse. The ED said that during an investigation, the accused staff was suspended, witness statements were taken, charts were reviewed, and a determination was made as to whether to substantiate the allegation. Depending on the results of the investigation, the accused staff member would either be invited back and educated or terminated. During a telephone interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/14/2023 at 2:02 PM, they stated staff who received or heard of an allegation of abuse were to report it immediately so an investigation could be initiated. The DON stated abuse investigations included suspension of alleged staff, interviewing staff and resident witnesses, an interdisciplinary (IDT) meeting and review, identification of interventions for resident safety, and notification of the resident's physician and family members. The DON stated the resident had a history of false allegations against multiple staff that included abuse and theft. Although the ED and DON stated during interviews that the resident made frequent abuse allegations against staff, there was no evidence to indicate these allegations of abuse were investigated by the facility. During a review of Progress Notes, the Incidents by Incident Type log, and the grievance log, there was no documentation of any abuse allegations and there was no evidence abuse allegations for Resident #57 were investigated. Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(8) Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse involving 5 (Residents #39, #149, #57, #66, and #53) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Findings included: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Area of Focus: Abuse & Neglect, revealed, 483.12(c) In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: 483.12(c)(2) Have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated. 1. A review of Resident #39's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 04/30/2019 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF), type two diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, and major depressive disorder. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/16/2022, revealed Resident #39 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Per the MDS, Resident #39 had no physical, verbal, or other behaviors. A review of Resident #39's Care Plan, initiated on 07/22/2019 and revised on 05/10/2023, indicated a potential risk for target behaviors related to depression, isolation, and sadness. The Care Plan directed staff to document any observed behaviors of agitation and rudeness to staff and residents and to refer to counseling as requested. A review of Resident #149's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 01/03/2023 with diagnoses that included dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and aphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate). A review of an admission MDS, with an ARD of 01/10/2023, revealed Resident #149 had a BIMS score of 5, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Per the MDS, Resident #149 wandered and had physical, verbal, and other behavioral symptoms directed and not directed towards others daily. A review of Resident #149's Care Plan, initiated on 01/27/2023 and revised on 03/31/2023, indicated the resident had the potential for physically aggressive behaviors related to anger, dementia, and a history of harm to others. The Care Plan directed staff to administer medications as ordered, provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety, and observe and report any signs or symptoms of the resident posing a danger to themself or others as needed. A review of Resident #149's Progress Notes revealed a Behavior Note, dated 01/19/2023 at 9:19 PM, that indicated Resident #149 entered Resident #39's room, and when Resident #39 asked Resident #149 to leave their room, Resident #149 responded by kicking Resident #39. A review of Resident #149's Physician/Nurse Communication form, dated 01/19/2023 and completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A, revealed Resident #149 entered other resident rooms and kicked Resident #39. A review of the Facility Verification of Investigation, dated 01/27/2023, indicated Resident #149 wandered into Resident #39's room, and when Resident #39 asked Resident #149 to leave their room, Resident #149 kicked Resident #39. Following the investigation, the facility determined no abuse or neglect had occurred. However, the investigation did not include staff or resident witness statements and no other residents were interviewed regarding resident-to-resident interactions. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 11:48 AM, the Executive Director (ED) stated they gave the surveyors the complete investigation related to the reportable incident between Resident #149 and Resident #39 that occurred in January 2023. During an interview on 07/13/2023 at 7:53 AM, LPN C could not remember if an investigation into the incident was conducted but said an investigation should include witness statements. During an interview on 07/14/2023 at 2:03 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated once the allegation was made, the DON and ED initiated an investigation, which included interviewing the staff and residents involved, getting witness statements, and speaking with other residents on the hall who were able to be interviewed. Per the DON, there were not any written witness statements about the incident between Resident #39 and Resident #149. During an interview on 07/14/2023 at 4:13 PM, the ED stated investigations included a detailed account on what allegedly occurred, any witness statements obtained, any staff education provided, and any new interventions put into place to prevent that incident or allegation from occurring again. The ED then stated it was important to thoroughly investigate any incidents of alleged abuse to ensure resident safety.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility faile...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12E1 Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication and treatment carts were locked when not within line of sight for 4 (two treatment carts on the 100 Hall, one treatment cart on the 200 Hall, and one medication cart on the 200 Hall) of 8 carts in the facility. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, 5.3 Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, revised 07/21/2022, revealed, 3.3 Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. During an observation on 07/12/2023 at 8:06 AM, there were two unlocked treatment carts (one light brown in color and the other dark brown in color) on 100 Hall, approximately 143 inches from the nurse at the medication cart who was administering medications. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was interviewed at that time and indicated they did not know who used the treatment carts last. LPN E pointed to the light brown cart and indicated that treatment cart was not used frequently but indicated the dark brown treatment cart was used regularly. LPN E indicated both treatment carts should have been locked. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 8:11 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated the treatment carts should have been locked when not in use and indicated the light brown cart was usually used for charting and contained prescription creams, barrier creams, and dressings. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 8:18 AM, LPN S, the treatment nurse, indicated the dark brown treatment cart was usually kept in their office. LPN S indicated the treatment cart should not be left unlocked if it was not being used. During an observation on 07/13/2023 at 5:37 AM, there was an unlocked medication cart beside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) G went into room [ROOM NUMBER] and closed the door. CMA G came out of room [ROOM NUMBER] at 5:41 AM and locked the medication cart. At 5:41 AM, CMA G indicated they should have locked the medication cart. The medication cart was observed with medications that included Eliquis (an anticoagulant), Cymbalta (an antidepressant), amlodipine (used to treat high blood pressure), baclofen (a muscle relaxer), gabapentin (an anticonvulsant), hydrochlorothiazide (a diuretic), lamotrigine (an anticonvulsant), losartan potassium (used to treat high blood pressure), insulin needles, and potassium chloride extended release. During an interview on 07/13/2023 at 12:51 PM, LPN B indicated all carts should be locked and should never be left unattended if unlocked. During an interview on 07/13/2023 at 7:55 PM, LPN M indicated all medication carts and treatment carts should be locked, and they should not be left unattended if they were unlocked. LPN M indicated there was a potential that a resident or visitor could get into the cart and get something that did not belong to them. During an interview on 07/14/2023 at 2:42 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the expectation was for unoccupied medication and treatment carts to be locked at all times. During on observation on 07/14/2023 at 3:45 PM, on the 200 Hall, a treatment cart was unlocked approximately 140 inches from room [ROOM NUMBER] where LPN E exited approximately one minute later. LPN E left the hallway pushing a resident while two surveyors observed the contents of the drawers on the treatment cart. Among the wound care supplies was a bottle of Dakin's solution and a bottle of betadine. There were no scissors observed. There were no other residents or staff in the hallway. At 3:49 PM, LPN E returned to the hall and indicated they had opened the treatment cart earlier to provide treatment to a resident. LPN E indicated the treatment cart should not have been left unlocked. During an interview on 07/14/2023 at 4:29 PM, the Executive Director (ED) indicated the facility had four treatment carts and four medication carts. The ED indicated they expected for staff to keep medication and treatment carts locked when not in eyesight.
Jul 2022 18 deficiencies 3 Harm
SERIOUS (H)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** D. Record Review of Resident 17's weights revealed the following: -6/23/2022 10:42 101.8 Lbs -6/12/2022 13:32 101.8 Lbs -6/2...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** D. Record Review of Resident 17's weights revealed the following: -6/23/2022 10:42 101.8 Lbs -6/12/2022 13:32 101.8 Lbs -6/2/2022 06:16 101.8 Lbs -4/26/2022 09:45 108.8 Lbs -4/12/2022 07:08 107.8 Lbs -4/2/2022 16:27 108.2 Lbs -3/29/2022 10:08 106.7 Lbs -3/27/2022 20:29 106.7 Lbs -3/23/2022 06:57 108.8 Lbs -3/15/2022 06:17 107.6 Lbs -3/13/2022 18:51 107.6 Lbs -2/28/2022 12:07 105.6 Lbs -2/14/2022 17:07 104.0 Lbs -2/8/2022 17:39 104.2 Lbs -2/6/2022 13:39 104.2 Lbs -2/4/2022 08:40 103.2 Lbs -1/25/2022 17:30 95.6 Lbs -1/23/2022 13:13 95.6 Lbs -1/18/2022 14:47 96.0 Lbs -1/9/2022 13:48 100.4 Lbs -1/9/2022 13:34 100.4 Lbs -1/4/2022 12:19 98.2 Lbs -The documented weight of 108.8 on 04/26/22 to a weight of 101.8 on 06/02/22 indicated a 6.43% weight loss. Review of Weight Change Note on 6/23/2022 at 20:18 revealed Resident 17 is at 101.8# with weight gain from 99.8#. Would continue regimen and monitor for stable weight. Interview conducted with the (Director of Nursing) DON on 07/05/22 at 09:00 AM which confirmed a significant weight loss of 6.43% from 4/26-6/02/22. Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D8 and 12-006.09D9 Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to evaluate and implement interventions to prevent significant weight loss for 5 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident 7, 9, 17, 50, 65) and failed to ensure water was within reach for Resident 9 and 19. The facility census was 91. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 65's Diagnosis list revealed Resident 65 has the following diagnoses: - Hemiplegia (weakness of one side of the body) related to CVA (stroke) - Dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing) Review of the facility weight documentation revealed, on 03/17/2022 Resident 65 weighed 162 lbs. and on 06/15/2022 Resident 65 weight was down to 136 pounds which is a 16 percent loss in 3 months. Review of Resident 65's physician orders revealed Resident 65 was placed on hospice services on 6/17/2022. Review of Resident 65's care plan dated 3/2/2022 revealed Resident 65 required extensive assist with meals. Observation on 6/22/2022 at 7:35 AM revealed Resident 65 in the facility dining room. Resident 65 was leaning to the left and having difficulty cutting pancakes with a knife and fork. No staff assisted Resident 65 to cut pancakes or assisted Resident 65 to eat. Resident 65 continued to attempt for 5 minutes to cut the pancake and eat. Resident 65 was unable to eat independently and dropped food on Resident 65's shirt while attempting to eat with right hand fingers. At 7:45 AM Resident 65 stopped attempting to eat and pushed the plate away. Resident 65 tried to eat oatmeal with a fork. No assistance was provided by the staff. Observation of Resident 65 on 06/22/22 at 12:34 PM revealed Resident 65 in the main facility dining room. Resident 65's plate was placed on the table in front of Resident 65. Resident 65 attempted to feed self. Staff were in the dining room assisting other residents. Resident 65 had a difficult time holding a regular fork. Resident 65 held fork by index finger and thumb at the top of the fork and attempted to stab at food. No staff in the dining area attempted to assist the resident during the entire meal service and no adaptive utensils were offered. Review of Resident 65's Nutrition/Dietary Note dated 5/9/2022 revealed Resident 65 was at 149 pounds with weight loss from 162.1 pounds in 1 month. The Dietician recommended adding 240 milliliters (ml- a unit of measure) Osmolyte 1.5 four times a day (QID) with 200ml H20 QID. Observation on 6/22/2022 at 9:31 AM revealed Registered Nurse (RN)-T gathered supplies for Resident 65's Tube feeding including a bottle of Osmolyte 1.5 237 ml. RN T revealed since Resident 65 ate over 50% of the breakfast meal as documented in Resident 65's intake sheet RN T will only give 100ml of osmolyte and the water flush. RN T accessed Resident 65's G-tube (Gastric Tube: a tube placed through the abdominal wall into the stomach to provide nutrition) and poured part of the bottle of osmolyte into tube without measuring. Review of Resident 65's Order Summary Report dated June 22,2022 revealed an order dated 5/16/2022 for Osmolyte 1.5 250 ml 4 times daily. Interview on 06/23/22 at 1:49 PM with the facility contracted Dietician revealed the osmolyte was to be given without being dependent on meal intake. Review of Resident 65's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order dated 5/16/2022 for Osmolyte 1.5 250 ml per G-tube four times a day for Supplement Caloric undernutrition. Review of Resident 65's MAR revealed for the month of May 2022 after the order was received on 5/16/2022 the resident did not receive any tube feeding 6 times, a reduced amount 6 times, several times the amount given was 237 ml instead of the ordered 250 ml. Review of Resident 65's MAR revealed for the month of June 2022 the resident did not receive a tube feeding 6 times, a reduced amount 7 times, and 237 ml documented instead of the 250 ml ordered Review of Resident 65's weight log revealed, on 05/25/2022, the resident weighed 142 pounds and on 06/15/2022, the resident weighed 136 pounds which is a 4.23 percent loss in less than 30 days. Review of Resident 65's progress note revealed no further review of Resident 65's continued weight loss was documented by the facility Dietician. Interview on 06/23/22 at 1:49 PM with the facility Dietician revealed the Dietician reviews weights from home and does not observe resident to make recommendations. Review of Resident 65's medical record revealed Resident 65 was placed on hospice care on 6/17/2022 and Resident 65 has not been weighed since 6/15/2022, therefore no available data to determine any further weight loss. Interview on 7/6/2022 at 11:58 AM with the Director of Nursing revealed Resident 65 should have been receiving the full amount of Osmolyte regardless of amount eaten, the resident should have been assisted with meals and the G-tube orders were not followed. B. Review of the Resident 50's NUTRITION: Assessment/Nutritional Data Collection Dated 5/11/2022 revealed Resident 50's weight is 192.2 pounds, estimated needs determined and met. Diet order consistent with nutrition needs. Will monitor for changes in weight, renal status, and tolerance to diet order. Review of an Alert Note dated 6/1/2022 revealed Resident 50 was admitted on [DATE] with bladder neck obstruction. Resident 50's current weight 219.4 pounds. Will discontinue from Risk Assessment Review (RAR) meeting. Review of Resident 50's weight log revealed Resident 50 gained 17 pounds to 219.4 pounds in the first 5 days in the facility and then lost 49.6 pound to 169.8 pounds in the next in 21 days. This is an overall weight loss of 23.6 pounds in 30 days or over 10% loss. No documentation was found in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) that this weight loss was identified or reviewed. Review of Resident 50's progress notes revealed No Dietary notes related to weight loss on 6/2/2022. No further dietary assessments were found in the medical record. Interview on 06/23/22 at 02:55 PM with the Dietician revealed the Dietician looks up weights from home and, relies on calls from the facility with weight loss concerns and provides recommendations. The Dietician comes into the facility for quarterly reviews. The facility did not notify the Dietician of the weight loss. The Dietician revealed Resident 50 has not been assessed since the initial admission nutrition assessment. On 7/6/2022 interview with the Director of Nursing revealed Resident 50's weight loss was not identified and investigated. C. Review of Resident 7's Nutrition/Dietary Note dated 2/6/2022 revealed Resident 7 is at 145# (pounds) with weight loss from 184# over 5 months. Would continue regimen and monitor for supportive nutrition. On 12/07/2021, the resident weighed 145 lbs. On 06/02/2022, the resident weighed 130 pounds which is a 10.34% Loss. Review of Resident 7's Alert Note dated 3/30/2022 revealed the facility staff questioned the accuracy of Resident 7's weight. It revealed a 20-pound weight loss. Nursing staff were instructed to re-weigh Resident 7 the following day. Review of Resident 7's weight log revealed no additional weight was obtained until 6 days later and results revealed Resident 7's weight to be 129.8# on 4/5/2022 compared to weight on 3/29/2022 of 126.8. No documentation was found in the medical record to show the weight loss of 15 pounds in 23 days was reported to the facility dietician. Interview on 06/23/22 at 2:52 PM with the Dietician revealed Resident 7's weight fluctuates, and Resident 7 has been off and on supplements and diuretics. The Dietician has not reviewed Resident 7's weight since 2/6/2022 and was not aware of the further weight loss. There was no dietary assessment after 2/6/2022. The Dietician agreed Resident 7's weight loss was significant and should have been addressed. E. Observation on 6/21/22 at 10:00 AM revealed Resident 9 in bed being assisted to eat a regular consistency diet by Nursing Assistant [NA] U. The resident did not exhibit any signs of coughing or choking. The resident was able to grasp the glass of water and drink independently. Observation on 6/21/22 at 1:19 PM revealed Resident 9 seated at a table in the dining area with a regular consistency diet plate of food. Resident 9 ate the food independently with some spilling onto the clothing and occasionally coughed throughout the breakfast meal. The resident was able to grasp the glass of water and drink independently. NA C stopped and encouraged the resident to slow down and take smaller bites of food. The staff member did not sit down or assist Resident 9 with eating. Record review of Resident 9's admission Minimum Data Set [MDS] [ a mandatory comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning] dated 12/21/21 revealed that Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had a Brief Inventory of Mental status [BIMS] score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, was independent with eating, had a weight of 165 and Diagnoses that included Dementia and Parkinsons Disease. The resident had no swallowing difficulties at the time of admission. Record review of a Transfer to the Hospital Summary Progress Note dated 2/8/22 revealed that Resident 9 was sent to the hospital and admitted for weakness on the right side. The Resident was admitted to the hospital for possible Cerebral vascular Accident and possible Aspiration Pneumonia. The resident returned to the facility on 2/11/22 per the Census Report in Resident 9's Electronic Medical Record [EMR]. Record review of Resident 9's most recent MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 6 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assist with eating and had a weight of 140. These indicated that Resident 9 had a decline in cognition, weight and in the ability to eat since admission to the nursing facility on 12/21/22. Record review of Resident 9's weight records since admission revealed the following weights over time from 6/23/22 to the admission date of 12/17/22: -6/23/2022 131.4 Lbs -6/14/2022 125.2 Lbs -4/6/2022 140.2 Lbs -3/15/2022 140.2 Lbs -3/2/2022 138.1 Lbs -1/30/2022 145.4 Lbs -1/25/2022 145.2 Lbs -1/18/2022 144.6 Lbs -1/6/2022 152.4 Lbs -12/22/2021 165.0 Lbs -12/17/2021 164.2 Lbs Record review of the weight records for Resident 9 revealed that on 12/17/2021 Resident 9 weighed 164 lbs. On 06/14/2022, Resident 9 weighed 125 pounds which was a -23.78 % weight loss over 6 months. Record review of a Progress Health Note dated 6/23/22 for Resident 9 revealed the following: - 6/23/2022 13:46 Health Status Note reweighed wheelchair; only 87 not 98lbs. So re weight on resident this am; incorrect. WEIGHT is 131.4. Record review of Resident 9's current weights as of 6/23/22 revealed the following: On 12/17/2021, the resident weighed 164 lbs. On 06/23/2022, the resident weighed 131 pounds which is a -20.12 % loss over 6 months. Record review of Resident 9's Nutrition Resident at Risk [NAR/ RAR] Progress Notes revealed the following information: - 3/11/2022 13:08 written by Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] K: RAR meeting held. Resident readmitted on 2/11 for stroke. Resident is on puree soft with nectar thick liquids. Current weight 138.1. Resident is working with PT/OT to improve current ADLs and mobility. - 2/6/2022 16:28 Nutrition/Dietary Note written by the Registered Dietician: Resident is at 145.4# with weight loss x 1 month from 164.2#. No skin breakdown noted. Rx Vitamin C, Colace, Lisinopril, Zinc. Dx Parkinsons, HLD, Dementia. Diet order remains appropriate. Receives Regular. Will continue to follow. Record review of Resident 9's Nutrition Assessment completed 1/16/22 by the Registered Dietician revealed the following: - Resident is a 145.4# with weight loss from 164.2#. Skin tx to right posterior knee. Rx Vitamin C, Colace, Zinc. Dx Parkinsons, HLD, Dysphagia, HTN, GERD. Estimated needs determined and met. Receives Regular Diet. Will monitor for stable weight. Would add 60ml Med Pass Supplement BID and d/c zinc and vitamin c. Will monitor. Record review of Resident 9's EMR revealed no other nutritional assessments had been completed between 2/6/22 and 6/23/22 by the Registered Dietician to address Resident 9's continued weight loss. On 6/23/22, the RD completed a Nutritional Assessment for Resident 9 after the start of the annual survey which revealed: Resident is at 131.2# with weight loss noted from 164.2#. hospitalized in February. Weight appears to have been previously in the range of 150#. Loss to 140#, now reweigh of 131.2#. Intake inadequate to maintain weight; however, kcal exceed needs. Previously tried med pass supplement but will request 60ml Med Pass Supplement BID and if resident accepts, will increase. Would also d/c Zinc and add MVI w/Minerals. Review of nutritional history, intake and progression of disease, unless intake improves, weight loss will likely continue regardless of increased kcal. Will follow for supportive nutrition. Record review of Resident 9's Physician Orders revealed no orders for Med Pass supplement given to Resident 9 prior to 6/30/22. Record review of Resident 9's Physician Orders dated 6/30/22 revealed an order for 2 Cal Med Pass[ a nutritional supplement high in calories to help people gain weight] Supplement 60 milliliter's [ml] to be give 2 times per day. Interview on 06/23/22 at 08:16 AM with the Director of Nursing [DON] confirmed that Resident 9 had a significant weight loss and that no supplements or other interventions were implemented to prevent further weight loss. The DON confirmed that Resident 9 was reviewed for weight loss by the NAR team and that the RD had not been to the facility to assess the resident and the continued weight loss since a nutrition note was written on February 6th of 2022. The DON confirmed that there were no NAR notes documented after 3/17/22 for Resident 9 when the resident was identified with stable weight at 140 pounds and was discontinued from the NAR/ RAR meetings. Interview on 06/23/22 at 1:31 PM with the RD confirmed that Resident 9 had not been assessed for continued weight loss since February of 2022 and that supplements were started for one day but then stopped. The RD was unsure of why the supplements had been stopped. The RD stated that nutritional assessments are completed by offsite review by looking at lab values and the NAR notes which would include any weight changes or loss. The RD stated that Resident 9's labs had been reviewed offsite in March of 2022 and were within normal limits at that time. The RD confirmed that the last time Resident 9 was assessed by the RD was February 6th, 2022. The RD stated [gender] was just made aware of Resident 9's weight loss on 6/23/22. Interview on 7/6/22 at 2:23 PM with the DON revealed that the resident had undergone several weeks of speech therapy in March and April after he came back from the hospital and that the Med Pass was discontinued in February 2022 due to refusals. On April 1st 2022, after speech therapy had worked with Resident 9, the diet order was changed from thickened liquids and puree to thin liquids and regular consistency. The DON confirmed that Resident 9 should have been reassessed by the RD after the speech therapy and the diet change and this was not done. F. Record review of Resident 9's MDS dated [DATE] revealed that Resident 9 required extensive assist with eating. Observations of Resident 9 on 6/21/22 at 10:00 AM, 11:06 AM and 3:30 PM and on 6/22/22 at 6:15 AM and 9:05 AM, 9:30 AM and 2:55 PM revealed Resident 9 seated in a wheelchair in room with a water pitcher on a bedside table that was located across the room and not within the residents reach. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 6/22/22 at 2:55 PM confirmed that Resident 9's water pitcher was not in reach of the resident and should be. The DON confirmed that Resident 9 was able to grasp a glass of water and drink independently. G. Record review of Resident 19's MDS dated [DATE] revealed that Resident 19 required supervision with eating. Observations of Resident 19 on 6/21/22 at 9:10 AM, 11:10 AM and 3:30 PM, on 6/22/22 at 6:25 AM, and 9:00 AM and on 6/23/22 at 7:05 AM revealed Resident 19 seated in a wheelchair in room with a water pitcher on a bedside table that was located across the room and not within the residents reach. Interview with the Medication Aide [MA] S on 6/23/22 at 7:07 AM confirmed that Resident 19's water pitcher was not in reach of the resident and should be. MA S confirmed that Resident 19 was able to grasp a glass of water and drink independently. Record review of a facility policy entitled Hydration and Nutrition effective 7/14/21 revealed: - Residents are to be offered sufficient fluid intakes to maintain hydration and health. - 4. Fluid is available to residents at all times. A hydration cart may be utilized. - 5. The resident is positioned properly to consume meals and snacks. Assistance is provided as needed. - 6. An ongoing assessment of the ability to consume and assimilate food and fluids is conducted by nursing personnel and all concerns are reported to the nurse to include weight loss or gain, signs of dehydration. - 8. The facility will document the intake percentages. H. Record review of Resident 9 and 19's Electronic Medical record [EMR] revealed no documentation of fluid intake percentages or fluids consumed. Interview on 06/23/22 at 02:11 PM with the Registered Dietician confirmed that residents should have water in reach in their rooms and that fluid intakes are not recorded unless ordered by the physician.
SERIOUS (H)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Administration (Tag F0835)

A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents

LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 Chapter 12-006.02 Based on observations, record review and interview, the administrative and consultant staff failed to ensure the facility resources were utilized in a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 Chapter 12-006.02 Based on observations, record review and interview, the administrative and consultant staff failed to ensure the facility resources were utilized in a manner to ensure provision of care and services for residents. This deficient practice provided the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility census was 91. Findings are: The facility was found to be deficient in multiple areas of regulatory compliance which required an extended survey related to substandard quality of care. The following issues related to systems failure and or failure to follow standards of care resulted in patterns of failure in the facility related to weight loss and hydration needs. Review of the facility roster matrix (a report indicating care concerns for each resident) developed from the MDS (Minimum Data Set: a federally mandated tool used for care planning) provided on entrance to the facility for annual survey revealed no residents identified for significant weight loss. Observations, record review and interviews through the initial phase of the survey identified 8 residents as having a potential significant weight loss. After moving into the investigative stage of the survey 6 were identified for Nutrition/hydration deficiencies related to lack of identification of the significant weight loss and monitoring interventions for reversing weight loss. Interview on 06/23/22 at 1:49 PM with the facility Dietician revealed the Dietician reviews weights from home and does not observe residents except for at the quarterly reviews. Interview with the administrator on 7/7/2022 at 9:10 AM revealed the facility does not have someone designated to review all resident weights monthly to identify significant weight loss and the facility should utilize the contracted Dietician more frequently.
SERIOUS (H)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC12-006.07 Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance program addressed concerns related to deficient practice cited o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC12-006.07 Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance program addressed concerns related to deficient practice cited on the annual and extended survey. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Annual survey completed on 7/7/2022 revealed deficient practice at the following areas: F558- Accommodation of needs F561-Self Determination F584-Safe/Clean/ homelike environment F623-Notice requirements before transfer/discharge F625-Notice of Bed Hold Policy before transfer F684-Quality of Care F689-Free of accident hazards F690-Bowel/Bladder Incontinence, catheter care F692-Nutrition/hydration maintenance F695-Respiratory care F726-Competent Nurse staff F809-Frequency of meals F812-Food storage and kitchen sanitation F835-Administration F867-QApi/QAA improvement activities F880-Infection Prevention and Control F886-Covid 19 staff testing F923-Ventilation F947 -Required In-service training for Nurse aides The Director of Nursing provided the Performance Improvement Plans (PIP) for nursing. Review of the facility PIP revealed the facility had plans to include Infection Surveillance, ADL assistance, Room moves, Wounds, low risk bowel and bladder incontinence, and Antipsychotic use in the PIP. Review of the facility [NAME] reports (a federal report listing facility deficiency history) revealed repeat tags from the previous 3 annual surveys include: 584- safe clean comfortable/homelike environment 623- Notice before transfer 625- Bed hold policy 684-Quality of Care 880- Infection Control 812- Food Procurement, store/prepare/serve Sanitary 867-QAA/QAPI Activities Interview on 7/7/2022 at 9:10 AM with the facility Administrator revealed the facility QAPI committee had not identified the cited deficient practice except for F809 regarding the extended meal serving times. A performance improvement plan had been developed but had not been put in place.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER NAC 172 12-006.05 (4) Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure bathing preferences were honored for 1 resident (Resident 38) of 1 sampled re...

Read full inspector narrative →
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER NAC 172 12-006.05 (4) Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure bathing preferences were honored for 1 resident (Resident 38) of 1 sampled resident. The facility staff identified a census of 91. The findings are: An interview conducted on 06/21/22 at 03:01 PM with Resident 38 revealed Resident 38 would like to take a bath but is only able to get a shower because the bath doesn't work in the bath house. Record review of bathing documentation for June 2022 for Resident 38 revealed the resident received a shower on 6/9/22 and 6/16/22. Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set: a federally mandated assessment tool used for care planning) dated 11/11/21 revealed an interview with Resident 38 on preferences. Resident 38 stated it was very important to choose between tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. Interview conducted with Nursing Assistant (NA) C on 7/5/22 at 06:34 AM revealed that the bath does not work and has not worked for a very long time. NA stated that there are residents who would like a bath instead of a shower but will take a shower cause that is their only choice.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(5) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide 2 residents (Resident 7 and 44) or their representatives a letter explaining the r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(5) Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide 2 residents (Resident 7 and 44) or their representatives a letter explaining the reason for transfer to the hospital and failed to notify the ombudsman of transfer for 1 resident (Resident 9). The facility census was 91 Findings are: A. Review of Resident 7's progress notes revealed on 1/12/2022 Resident 7 was transferred to the hospital due to lab results. Review of Resident 7's medical record revealed no letter explaining the reason for transfer was provided to Resident 7 or Resident 7's representative. Interview on 06/22/22 at 4:01 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed no letter explaining the reason for Resident 7's transfer was given to the resident or residents representative. B. Review of Resident 44's progress notes revealed Resident 44 was transferred to the hospital with diagnoses of increased weakness, shortness of breath and a cough. Review of Resident 44's medical record revealed no letter explaining the reason for transfer was provided to Resident 44 or Resident 44's representative. Interview on 06/22/22 at 4:01 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed no letter explaining the reason for Resident 44's transfer was given to the resident or residents representative. C. Record review of Resident 9's Progress Note's revealed the following: - 2/8/2022 11:28, Transfer to Hospital Summary: Therapy reporting res having increased weakness unable to bear weight on right side grips to right hand weak and [gender] is leaning to the right side. Advanced Practice Registered Nurse [APRN] notified new orders to send to ER. - 2/8/2022 15:54, Health Status Note: Resident admitted to Hospital for Diagnoses [DX]: Ceberal Vascular Accident [CVA] and Aspiration PNA [Pneumonia]. Record review of a Transfer / Discharge List dated 4/19/22 for the month of February 2022 revealed that Resident 9's transfer was not listed on the monthly report sent to the Ombudsman [a government offical who receieves, investigates and helps settle complaints and serves as an advocate for residents]. An Interview on 6/23/22 at 9:58 AM with the facility Administrator confirmed that Resident 9's name and transfer/discharge to the hospital had not been included on the list sent to the Ombudsman.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide 2 residents ( Resident 44 and 65) or their representatives...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide 2 residents ( Resident 44 and 65) or their representatives a bed hold notification on hospital transfers. The facility census was 91 Findings are: A. Review of Resident 65's Progress notes revealed Resident 65 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 3/3/2022. Review of Resident 65's Event Note dated 2/28/2022 revealed Resident 65 was having low Blood Pressures and complaining of having severe pain to the right side of the head. Resident 65's Power of Attorney (POA) requested that Resident 65 be sent to hospital for evaluation. Review of Resident 65's medical record revealed no bed hold notification paperwork or progress note that bed hold notification was provided to Resident 65 or Resident 65's POA. Interview on 06/22/22 at 4:01 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed no bed hold notification was given to Resident 65 or the POA. B. Review of Resident 44's progress note dated 3/2/2022 revealed Resident 44 was admitted to the hospital for a diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury. Review of Resident 44's medical record revealed no bed hold paperwork or progress note that bed hold was provided. Interview on 06/22/22 at 4:01 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed no bed hold notification was given to Resident 44 or the POA.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D2 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to assess a skin problem for Resident 38 and failed to notify the physician (MD) f...

Read full inspector narrative →
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D2 Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to assess a skin problem for Resident 38 and failed to notify the physician (MD) for treatment. The facility staff identified a census of 91. The findings are: On 06/23/22 at 08:15 AM an observation of Resident 38's skin during peri care revealed groin and abdominal folds a deep red. Resident 38 moaned of pain and voiced ouch with each wipe of the red areas during peri care. (Nursing Assistant) NA A applied Aloe Vesta to buttocks and applied an antifungal powder that was at Resident 38's bedside to groin and abdominal folds. During the observation Resident 38 stated that the staff never put anything on the red areas. Review of current orders for Resident 38 revealed an order to apply a generous layer of A&D ointment to bilateral buttocks for MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Disorder) twice daily and as needed. There is no evidence of an order for an antifungal powder. Record Review of Resident 38's Weekly Skin Integrity Data Collection revealed the following: -4/7/22; left gluteal fold shearing. -4/14/21; open area to coccyx is closed. Treatment in place with A&D to both buttocks, scabs/scratches bilateral lower legs. -4/22/22; friction/shearing and other checked with no documentation of what other is. -5/1/22; bruise, friction/shearing, other checked with no documentation of what other is. -5/8/22; bruise and other checked with no documentation of what other is. -6/1/22; skin intact -6/5/22; skin intact -6/14/22; bruise to left and right abdominal areas from insulin injections. Sites without warmth or swelling and denies complaints pain or discomfort. Has scabs to Bilateral Lower Extremities (BLE) redness to front of BLE with complaints pain or tenderness. Areas without warmth. Has treatment in place. -6/21/22; Skin intact. Interview with the (Director of Nursing) DON at 02:41 PM on 6/23/22 confirmed that the reddened areas to Resident 38's groin and abdominal folds had not been identified and that there was no order to apply Antifungal Powder. Further the DON confirmed that the expectation would be to identify skin issues on the Weekly Skin Integrity Data Collection and notify the physician for treatment orders. Record review on 06/27/22 of the medical record for Resident 38 revealed no indication of an assessment of red groin and abdominal folds or that the physician had been notified for treatment. Interview on 07/05/22 at 07:12 AM with NA A confirmed that the resident has red areas to bilateral groin areas and abdominal folds and the antifungal powder that was applied to red areas is over the counter. Interview on 07/05/22 at 07:47 AM with LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) AA revealed Resident 38 does not have an order for Nystatin Powder at least not on (gender) shift. LPN AA confirmed no Nystatin Powder on the medication/treatment cart.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7b Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7b Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for 1 resident (Resident 76) of 2 sampled residents. The facility staff identified a census of 91. The findings are: Record review of Resident 76's medical record revealed an admit date of 11/4/2020 with diagnoses of repeated falls, weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of an event note dated 4/3/2022 at 17:29 revealed the following: Staff were in hallway and heard a noise and entered resident's room. Staff found Resident 76 sitting on the floor beside roommate's bed. Resident 76's feet were straight out and shoes were intact. Neurological assessment within normal limits. Range of motion within normal limits. No apparent injury noted at this time. Intervention for fall is to make sure the tilt and space wheelchair is tilted back when in room. Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS: a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 5/27/22 revealed the facility staff assessed the following about Resident 76: -Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2. According to the MDS [NAME] a score of 2 indicates a resident has a severe cognitive deficit. -Required Extensive assistance with transfers and toileting with 1 person physical assist. Review of Resident 76's current comprehensive care plan revealed: Resident is at risk for falls related to decreased mobility. The following FALLS were identified: -On 9/14/21 a fall without injury with an intervention for a body pillow for positioning while in bed -On 12/10/21 a fall without injury with an intervention for Resident 76 to be toileted before and after meals and prior to being laid down - On 12/16/21 a fall without injury with an intervention to offer to lay down between meals -On 12/17/21 a fall without injury with an intervention for Occupational Therapy to establish a structured routine to prevent falls. -On 12/24/21 a fall without injury with an intervention for Proper footwear. -On 2/9/22 a fall without injury with an intervention for staff education on toileting schedules -On 4/3/22 a fall without injury with an intervention to make sure resident positioned for safety before leaving the room. Review of the fall assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 20. Review of the fall assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 14 and the fall assessment dated [DATE] revealed a score of 18. Per facility fall assessment a score of 10 or above interventions should be initiated. Review of the daily Routine taped on the wall of Residents 76's room by the bed revealed the following: -8:30 AM - 09:30 AM Resident to dining room or seated in wheelchair for breakfast. -In AM tilt in chair or lay down - toileting -11:30 AM-12 Noon Resident to dining room for lunch - toilet 30 minutes before lunch. -In PM tilt in chair or lay down - toileting -5:00 PM Resident to dining room for dinner - toilet 30 minutes before meal. On 06/21/22 at 01:28 PM an observation revealed Resident 76 sitting in a regular wheelchair. On 06/21/22 at 03:00 PM an observation revealed Resident 76 was lying in bed with no body pillow for positioning. On 07/05/22 at 08:21 AM an observation of Resident 76 revealed the resident sitting in a regular wheelchair for breakfast. Interview with NA (Nursing Assistant) A on 07/05/22 at 08:54 AM confirmed that the resident does not have a tilt in space wheelchair. NA A also confirmed there was no body pillow for positioning in the bed in the room. Interview with the Director of Nursing at 09:00 AM on 07/05/22 confirmed that the resident was no longer in a tilt and space wheelchair and the daily routine was not updated accordingly. The DON further confirmed there was no body pillow in the resident's room.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09D3 Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 54) received suprapubic catheter care (care of a flexible ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09D3 Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 54) received suprapubic catheter care (care of a flexible tube inserted into the urinary bladder through the abdominal wall) and perineal care (the cleaning of the external genitals and surrounding area) in accordance with professional standards of care and the facility's policy and procedures. Findings are: An observation of suprapubic catheter care performed by Nurse Aide A for Resident 54 on 06-23-2022 at 10:20AM revealed the following. Nurse Aide A (NA) used a back and forth motion with a wet washcloth to scrub dried blood from the portion of the suprapubic catheter closest to the abdominal opening. This motion had the potential to introduce bacteria through the abdominal opening and into the bladder. An observation on 06-23-2022 at 10:30AM of Resident 54's entire suprapubic catheter revealed the suprapubic catheter was not secured to the resident's leg or abdomen. An observation on 06-23-2022 at 11:45AM revealed the following. Resident 54 was transferred via mechanical lift to a wheelchair. During the transfer NA - A attached Resident 54's catheter bag to Resident 54's left shoe. An interview with NA-A on 06-23-2022 at 11:45AM confirmed that the catheter is attached to Resident 54's shoe to keep it out of the way during transfer and that the catheter is then attached to Resident 54's wheelchair when the transfer is completed. A record review of the document Suprapubic Catheter Care, dated 11-19-2021, paragraph titled Site Care for a newly inserted catheter revealed the following: -Moisten a sterile cotton-tipped swab in sterile water or normal saline solution. While stabilizing the catheter with your non-dominant hand, use your dominant hand to clean the skin around the catheter insertion site with the moistened swab, moving outward in concentric circles. -Using a sterile gauze pad moistened with sterile water or normal saline solution, clean the base of the catheter gently, moving up and away from the catheter insertion site. A record review of the document Suprapubic Catheter Care, dated 11-19-2021, paragraph titled Completing the Procedure revealed the following: -Using a catheter securement device, secure the urine drainage system tubing below the level of the patient's bladder to prevent backflow of urine into the bladder, which increases the risk of catheter-associated urinary tract infection. An interview with Resident 54 on 06-23-2022 at 11:55AM revealed the catheter was changed on 06-21-2022. An observation of perineal care provided to Resident 54 by NA A on 06-23-2022 at 11:00AM revealed the following. Resident 54's foreskin was difficult to retract (pull back). There was smegma (a white cheesy substance) visible underneath the foreskin (the retractable roll of skin covering the end of the penis) prior to the foreskin being retracted. There was a large amount of white cheesy substance visible on the head of the penis and around the opening of the penis when the foreskin was retracted. An interview with NA - A on 06-23-2022 at 11:30AM confirmed that Resident 54's penis would not have a large amount of smegma present if perineal care was provided daily. A record review of Resident 54's physician orders revealed there was no order for perineal care. A record review of the document 'Perineal care of the male patient - Revised May 20,2022 revealed the following: -The procedure promotes cleanliness and prevents infection. It also removes irritating and odorous secretions, such as smegma, a cheese like substance that collects under the foreskin of the penis. Perineal care, which includes care of the external genitalia and the anal area, should occur during the daily bath and after urination and bowel movements in cases of incontinence. An interview on 06-23-2022 at 03:09PM with Director of Nursing (DON), confirmed the expectation is perineal care is to be performed daily. An interview with the DON confirmed that if perineal care is performed daily then smegma is not expected to be found under the foreskin of a penis. An interview with DON confirmed that all nurse aides are expected to be competent in perineal care. An interview on 06-23-2022 at 03:14PM withthe DON confirmed the DON was unable to provide competencies for any nursing staff. The DON was unable to find any competencies for any nursing staff performed under the previous DON.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D6 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Oxygen was administered as ordered for 1 (Resident 19) of 1 reviewed. The facility cens...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D6 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Oxygen was administered as ordered for 1 (Resident 19) of 1 reviewed. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Record review of Physician Orders for Resident 19 revealed an order dated 10/29/20 for Oxygen 2.5 liters per minute to be given continuously through the nasal cannula for a diagnoses of Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. Observation on 6/21/22 at 10:03 AM, 11:09 AM, 1:34 AM and 3:30 PM, 6/22/22 at 9:00 AM, 9:40 AM and 10:20 AM and on 6/28/22 at 8:35 AM revealed that Resident 19 was seated in the residents' room in a wheelchair watching TV. The resident had an oxygen tank on the back of the wheelchair with tubing and a nasal cannula attached. The oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were in contact with the floor and oxygen was not on or administered to Resident 19. Observation on 6/23/22 at 8:35 AM with the facility Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] F confirmed that Resident 19's Oxygen was not in place or being administered. Interview on 06/23/22 at 08:35 AM with the facility LPN F confirmed Resident 19's Physician Order for the continuous oxygen and that Resident 19 should have it on at all times in accordance with the Physician Order.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.06C Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that call light...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.06C Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that call lights were accessible and in reach for 4 (Residents 50, 67, 19 and 9) of 24 residents that required assistance with activities of daily living. The facility census was 91. Findings are: A. Review of Resident 50's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated comprehensive assessment tool used for care planning) dated 5/13/22 revealed diagnoses of Coronary Artery Disease, Renal Failure, Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and use of an indwelling catheter. The MDS identified the resident required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, personal hygiene and toileting and was always incontinent of bowel. Observation on 6/21/22 at 11:19 AM revealed that Resident 50 did not have a call light in reach of the resident. The call light lay across the call system board on the wall and could not be accessed if needed. B. Review of Resident 's 67's MDS dated [DATE] revealed diagnoses of Heart Failure, Hypertension, Renal Insufficiency and Diabetes Mellitus. The MDS identified the resident required extensive staff assistance with toileting and limited staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, personal hygiene and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 6/21/22 at 1:18 PM revealed that Resident 67 did not have a call light within reach of the resident. The call light was on the floor near the head of the bed and could not be accessed if needed. C. Review of Resident 19's MDS dated [DATE] revealed diagnoses of Atrial Fibrillation Hypertension and Renal Failure. The MDS identified the resident required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, personal hygiene and toileting and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 6/21/22 at 11:11 AM, 3:33 PM and on 6/22/22 at 6:25 AM revealed that Resident 19 did not have a call light in reach of the resident. The call light was on the floor behind the bed and could not be accessed if needed. D. Review of Resident 9's MDS dated [DATE] revealed diagnoses of Cerebral Vascular accident with Hemiplegia, Non-Alzheimer's dementia and Parkinsons Disease. The MDS identified the resident required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, personal hygiene and toileting and was always incontinent of bladder. Observation on 6/21/22 at 11:23 AM, 1:30 PM, 3:30 PM and on 6/22/22 at 6:15 AM revealed that Resident 9 did not have a call light in reach of the resident. The call light was on the floor behind the wheelchair and could not be accessed if needed. E. Interview on 6/22/22 at 6:30 AM with Medication Aide S confirmed that Resident 19 and Resident 9's call light were not in reach of the residents and should be and that Resident 19 and 9 needed assistance with activities of daily living. F. Interview on 07/05/22 at 08:10 AM with the Director of Nursing confirmed that call lights should always be in reach and accessible to residents when in their rooms.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006-18 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain fixtures, walls...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006-18 Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain fixtures, walls, floors, furniture and doors in a working and cleanable manner in 11 (Resident rooms 101, 119, 208, 209, 213, 305, 314, 410, 415, 416 and 418) of 66 occupied resident rooms. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Observations on 6/21/22 between 8:45 AM and 3:30 PM revealed the following environmental issues in the facility: - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Sink drains slowly, no hot water in bathroom. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Air Conditioner [AC] unit not working. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Toilet wont flush, walls need painted over drywall in room. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Skid strips pulled away from the floor in front of the toilet. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Scrape wall near the head of bed A. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Footboard of bed chipped, bathroom door scraped and chipped. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Scrapes along the bathroom wall, broken towel dispenser, soiled toilet base, light out in bathroom, scrapes linoleum bathroom, missing baseboard in the room, bathroom door scraped. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Scrapes on wall behind the bed, AC unit cover off and not working, low water pressure in the bathroom sink. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Base of the toilet stained with a brown substance. Observation on 07/05/22 between 9:00 AM and 09:31 AM with the Maintenance Director and the Administrator revealed the following environmental issues in the facility: - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Sink drains slowly. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: AC unit not working. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Toilet wont flush, walls need painted over drywall. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Broken ,cracked baseboards in room near the closet. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Skid strips pulled away from the floor in front of the toilet. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Scrape wall near head of bed A. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Footboard chipped, Bathroom door scraped and chipped. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Scrapes wall, soiled toilet base, scrapes linoleum bathroom, missing baseboard, door scraped. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Scrapes wall behind the bed, A C unit cover off, poor water pressure in sink in bathroom, missing threshold strip at entrance to room, base toilet stained with a brown substance. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Base toilet stained with a brown substance, scrapes on the wall by bed A. - room [ROOM NUMBER]: Scrapes on the wall by Bed A. Interview on 07/05/22 at 09:32 AM with the MD confirmed the observations of the fixtures, walls, floors, furniture and doors and confirmed that they did not have any work orders for the identified issues. The MD confirmed that those areas needed to be cleaned and repaired.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04B2 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete competencie...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04B2 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete competencies for 5 ( Registered Nurse [RN] H, Licensed Practical Nurses [LPN's] I, J, K and L ) Licensed Nurses of 5 reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility had a total of 26 licensed nurses on staff. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Record review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed that staff training is conducted through new hire and annual training. The facility shall utilize department specific competencies for review of policies and procedures for resident care. Record review of employee files, education and competency records for Registered Nurse [RN] H and Licensed Practical Nurse's [LPN] LPN I, LPN J, LPN K and LPN L revealed no competency records for 2022. Interview on 6/23/22 at 1:15 PM with the facility Director of Nursing [DON] revealed that staff were unable to locate any competency records. The DON confirmed that no competencies had been completed for RN's or LPN's since 2021.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.17B Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to implemen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.17B Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to implement transmission based precautions to prevent the potential for cross contamination on the 100 hall and the facility failed to maintain oxygen tubing and nasal cannulas in a manner to prevent cross contamination for Resident 19 and 9. The facility staff identified a census of 91. The findings are: A. On 06/21/22 at 10:18 AM an observation was made of the transmission based precautions (TBP) for room [ROOM NUMBER]. The TBP were for C-Diff (Clostridium Difficile Colitis; an inflammation of the colon caused by a bacteria). Observation included a cart outside of room112 with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) including gowns, gloves, masks, and eye protection. Further observation revealed 1 red barrel outside of the door for room [ROOM NUMBER] labeled for linen and 1 red barrel outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] labeled for trash. An interview at 10:20 AM on 06/21/22 with NA (Nursing Assistant) B revealed that the procedure for staff is to put on a gown, gloves, mask and eye protection when entering room [ROOM NUMBER] and when care is complete they come out of room [ROOM NUMBER] and take off the gloves and gown and placed them in the barrels. On 06/21/22 at 10:48 AM an observation of TBP revealed both red barrels and cart with PPE was moved across the hall from the TBP room [ROOM NUMBER]. NA B and NA C confirmed that there are no barrels located in room [ROOM NUMBER] for the removal of the PPE before leaving the room. Record review of the facility's C-diff Policy and procedure revised 02/22/21 revealed to ensure that disposal bins are positioned near the exit inside of residents room to make it easy for staff to discard PPE after removal, prior to exiting the room, or before providing care to another resident. Record review of the facility's policy Standard Precautions, Transmission-based Precautions dated 02/15/2021 revealed make PPE readily available near the entrance to the residents room. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] TBP at 11:23 AM on 06/21/22 revealed a visitor came out of the room and removed the gown and gloves and placed in the red trash barrel across the hall. PTA (Physical Therapy Assistant) D went into the room with gown, gloves, mask and eye protection. At 11:54 AM PTA D and Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant (COTA) E came out of room [ROOM NUMBER] with their gowns and gloves. Removed gown and gloves outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] and placed them in the red trash barrel across the hall. Interview conducted on 6/21/22 at 11:30 AM with LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) F, Infection Control regarding TBP for C-diff revealed that education with the staff on TBP for C-diff had just started and the procedure is for staff to remove their gloves and gown in the residents room and put them in a trash bag and then bring out to the red barrel in the hallway. B. Record review of a facility policy dated 8/2/21 entitled Oxygen Administration / Safety/ Storage/ Maintenance revealed that the policy was to store Oxygen and respiratory supplies in a bag labeled with residents name when not in use. C. Record review of Resident 19's Physician orders dated 10/29/20 revealed an order for Oxygen to be given at 2.5 liters per minute per nasal cannula continuously every shift for Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. Observation on 6/21/22 at 10:03 AM, 11:09 AM, 1:34 AM and 3:30 PM and on 6/28/22 at 8:35 AM revealed that Resident 19 was seated in the residents' room in a wheelchair watching TV. The oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were in contact with the floor. Record review of Resident 19's Physician orders dated 2/17/22 revealed an order for Oxygen to be given at 2 liters per minute per nasal cannula as needed. D. Observation on 6/21/22 at 10:00 AM, 11:23 AM, 11:45 AM and 3:30 PM and on 6/28/22 at 8:35 AM revealed Resident 9 was seated in the residents' room in a wheelchair watching TV. The oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were in contact with the floor. E. Observation on 6/23/22 at 8:35 AM with the facility Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] F confirmed that Resident 19 and 9's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula were in contact with the floor in the residents rooms. F. Interview on 6/23/22 at 8:35 AM with LPN F confirmed that the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula should not be in contact with the floor and should be wrapped up and stored in a bag if not in use.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0923 (Tag F0923)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-007.04D Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ventilation system in resident bathrooms were operational in 9 (Rooms 119, 208, 209,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-007.04D Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ventilation system in resident bathrooms were operational in 9 (Rooms 119, 208, 209, 213, 214, 407, 410, 415 and 416) of 66 occupied resident rooms. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Observations on 6/21/22 between 8:45 AM and 3:30 PM revealed that the ventilation systems in resident bathrooms in rooms 119, 208, 209, 213, 214, 407, 410, 415 and 416 did not draw a 1 ply square of toilet tissue to the surface of the ventilation covers in resident bathrooms. The fact that the tissue square was not drawn to the cover indicated that the ventilation system was not operational at the time of the observation. Observation on 07/05/22 between 9:00 AM and 09:26 AM revealed that the ventilation systems in resident bathrooms in rooms 119, 208, 209, 213, 214, 407, 410, 415 and 416 did not draw a 1 ply square of toilet tissue to the surface of the ventilation covers in resident bathrooms. Interview on 07/05/22 at 09:27 AM with the facility Maintenance Director [MD] confirmed that the ventilation system was not working. The MD stated that they check the system whenever it pops up on their preventative maintenance system. The MD was unsure how often the ventilation systems were checked. Maintenance documentation for each hallway in the facility for a 12 month time span from 7/24/21 to 6/25/21 revealed that the exhaust ventilation system in each resident bathroom was cleaned 1 time per month. There was no documentation present that the ventilation systems had been checked to ensure they were operational. Interview on 7/6/22 at 2:04 PM with the MD confirmed that the ventilation systems are checked for cleanliness each month in all rooms but the facility was unable to provide documentation that the ventilation systems were checked routinely to ensure they were operational.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0809 (Tag F0809)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11B Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11B Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure meals were served at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community. This had the potential to affect 91 residents that ate foods in the facility dining rooms or in their rooms. The facility census was 91. Findings are: Record review of a list of facility dining times revealed that breakfast was from 7:00 - 9:00 AM, lunch is from 12:00 - 1:00 PM and supper was from 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM. Record review of a facility grievance dated 2/7/22 revealed that multiple residents had complaints related to cold food and late meals and inquired about a plan to make meals more time appropriate. Observation of the facility breakfast meal on 6/21/22 revealed that the meal service started at 7:00 AM in the facility dining room and room trays were started to be plated at 9:20 AM. Observation revealed that the last breakfast room tray was served to 4 residents on the 400 hall at 10:00 AM, 1 hour past the posted time of the meal service. Observation of Resident 70 on 6/21/22 at 9:40 AM revealed that the resident received a breakfast tray at 9:45 AM. Interview with Resident 70 on 6/21/22 at 9:45 AM revealed that the meals are usually late and that it was not unusual to get the meals at 10:00 AM for breakfast and at 2:00 PM for lunch. The resident stated they felt that was too late to be eating the meals. Observation of the facility lunch meal on 6/21/22 revealed the meal service started at 12:10 PM. The Dietary Manager [DM] delivered one meal at a time to the 45 residents in the main dining room between 12:05 PM and 12:20 PM. At 12:20 PM Dietary Aide [DA] G began assisting to serve residents in the main dining room. At 12:30 PM there were a total of 13 people in the dining room that had not been served. The meal service to the dining room ended at 12:50 PM. At that time, there were 19 room trays to be delivered. Observation revealed that Resident 70 received the meal at 1:40 PM. The last room tray was delivered to room [ROOM NUMBER] at 1:45 PM, 45 minutes past the posted time of the meal. Observation of the facility breakfast meal on 6/22/22 revealed that the meal service started at 7:00 AM in the facility dining room and room trays were started to be plated at 9:20 AM. Observation revealed that the last breakfast room tray was served to 4 residents on the 400 hall at 9:50 AM, 50 minutes past the posted time of the meal service. Observation of Resident 70 on 6/22/22 at 9:40 AM revealed that the resident received a breakfast tray at 9:40 AM, 40 minutes after the posted dining times. Observation of the last served meal tray on 06/22/22 at 10:00 AM with the DM revealed that room tray food temperatures were taken and the eggs temperature was 123 degrees Fahrenheit [F] and the sausage patty temperature was 103 degrees F. Interview on 6/22/at 10:00 AM with the DM confirmed that the food tasted cold and was below the required 135 degree food temperature requirements by the food code. The DM confirmed that the room tray meals were served outside of the 7:00 - 9:00 AM timeframe. The DM stated it is the expectation that meals be served between 7 and 9 AM and 11 and 1:00 PM and that facility staff have been talking about how to improve this. The DM confirmed that room trays were delivered 45 minutes to 1 hour outside of the facility timeframe for meals. Interview on 07/05/22 at 06:41 AM with the Director of Nursing confirmed that all residents ate foods prepared and served from the facility kitchen.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and gloving were performed in a manner to prevent the potential for food bo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and gloving were performed in a manner to prevent the potential for food borne illness and failed to maintain the cleanliness and condition of shelving units, floors, ventilation systems, ceiling tiles and dish holder carts in the facility kitchen. This had the potential to affect 91 residents in the facility that ate foods prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 91. Findings are: A. Observation on 6/22/22 between 11:55 AM and 12:30 PM in the facility kitchen revealed [NAME] R prepared to plate the lunch meal. With no hand hygiene performed, [NAME] R donned gloves and began plating a meal. [NAME] R then left the food service area, went to the refrigerator and touched the handle, opened the door and got out a salad. [NAME] R returned to the meal service area and with the same soiled gloves in place, proceeded to plate more meals. [NAME] R then left the meal service area and with the same gloves, touched the handle to the exterior door, left the kitchen and then returned with goggles. [NAME] R had the same gloves in place. With no hand hygiene and the same soiled gloves in place, [NAME] R proceeded to continue to plate food for the meal service. Observation on 6/22/22 between 12:10 PM and 12:30 PM in the facility kitchen revealed Dietary Aide [DA] G removed soiled dishes from the counter, went into the dish room and sprayed the dished off, returned to the kitchen and and wiped the counters with a sanitation cloth. With no hand hygiene performed, DA G donned gloves and began to prepare chicken salad sandwiches. When this was completed, DA G removed the soiled gloves and with no hand hygiene performed donned new gloves and began to serve trays of food to residents in the dining area. Interview on 6/22/22 at 1:01 PM with the Dietary Manager [DM] confirmed that the cook and the dietary aide should have performed hand hygiene each time between leaving the service area and coming back to the meal service and before donning new gloves. B. Observation on 6/21/22 at 8:40 AM with the DM revealed the following concerns with the environment in the facility kitchen: - In the walk in refrigerator and freezer the floors, walls and metal storage racks had a reddish substance that resembled rust and areas where the paint had peeled off. - The air flow fans were coated with a gray fuzzy substance that resembled dust in the walk in refrigerator. - The interior of the walk in refrigerator and freezer had food particles and liquids spatters present on the walls, floors and shelves. - The ventilation systems above the stove and food preparation areas had a gray fuzzy substance that resembled dust on the exterior of the ventilation systems covers. - The reach in refrigerator had food particles and liquid spatters present on the walls and shelves of the unit. Observation on 6/22/22 at 2:00 PM with the DM revealed the following concerns with the environment in the facility kitchen: - In the walk in refrigerator and freezer the floors, walls and metal storage racks had a reddish substance that resembled rust and areas where the paint had peeled off. - The air flow fans were coated with a gray fuzzy substance that resembled dust in the walk in refrigerator. - The interior of the walk in refrigerator and freezer had food particles and liquids spatters present on the walls, floors and shelves. - The ventilation systems (4 of 4) above the stove and food preparation areas had a gray fuzzy substance that resembled dust on the exterior of the ventilation systems covers. - The ceiling tiles above the food preparation rea had water damage spots present. - The spice shelf had grease, dust and food particles present. - Two of 2 dish holder carts had food particles and splatters of liquids present. - The stove hood had a greasy substance and a dark fuzzy substance that resembled dust present. Interview on 6/22/22 at 2:10 PM with the DM confirmed that the walk in refrigerator and freezer were dirty and had rust and areas where the paint had peeled off, the air flow fans were dust covered, the ventilation system covers were dust covered, the ceiling tiles had water damage spots, the spice shelf was soiled and greasy, the dish holder carts were soiled and the stove hood had grease and dust present. The DM stated these areas all needed to be cleaned. Interview on 07/05/22 at 06:41 AM with the Director of Nursing confirmed that all residents ate foods prepared in the facility kitchen.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0886 (Tag F0886)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff testing was completed in a manner to prevent the potential spread of Covid 19. The findings are: Observation of s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff testing was completed in a manner to prevent the potential spread of Covid 19. The findings are: Observation of staff testing on 07/05/22 at 06:15 AM revealed NA (Nursing Assistant) BB performed the COVID 19 testing on self. NA BB was not wearing a gown or gloves. Observation of LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) AA on 07/05/22 at 06:18 AM revealed LPN AA performed the COVID 19 testing on self. LPN AA was not wearing a gown or gloves. An observation at 06:27 AM on 07/05/22 revealed LPN CC performed the COVID 19 testing on self. LPN CC was not wearing a gown or gloves. Interview at 06:56 AM on 07/05/22 with the administrator confirmed that testing is usually done by a nurse that has been trained to test and staff should not be testing themselves. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 07/05/22 at 09:05 AM revealed that there are only 3-4 nurses that have been trained to test and that is the DON, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the Infection Preventionist (IP) and the nursing house supervisor. There were no competencies for the staff providing COVID 19 testing provided by the facility. Interview with LPN F Infection Preventionist on 07/05/22 at 07:45 AM confirmed that the staff are testing themselves and that is how they usually handle testing. Review of the facility's SARS-CoV-2 POC Testing revised 2/18/22 revealed the following: - Follow Standard Precautions when handling specimens, including hand hygiene, and the use of PPE which includes an N95 or higher-level respirator (or facemask if respirator is not available), eye protection, gloves, and gown, when collecting specimens.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
  • • 39% turnover. Below Nebraska's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 34 deficiencies on record, including 4 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • Grade D (40/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 40/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Life Care Center Of Elkhorn's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Life Care Center of Elkhorn an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Staffed?

CMS rates Life Care Center of Elkhorn's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the Nebraska average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Life Care Center Of Elkhorn?

State health inspectors documented 34 deficiencies at Life Care Center of Elkhorn during 2022 to 2024. These included: 4 that caused actual resident harm and 30 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Life Care Center Of Elkhorn?

Life Care Center of Elkhorn is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 135 certified beds and approximately 93 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Elkhorn, Nebraska.

How Does Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Life Care Center of Elkhorn's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Life Care Center Of Elkhorn?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Life Care Center of Elkhorn has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Stick Around?

Life Care Center of Elkhorn has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for Nebraska nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Ever Fined?

Life Care Center of Elkhorn has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Life Care Center Of Elkhorn on Any Federal Watch List?

Life Care Center of Elkhorn is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.