Life Care Center of Elkhorn
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The Life Care Center of Elkhorn has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average care with some notable concerns. They rank #88 out of 177 nursing homes in Nebraska, placing them in the top half of facilities in the state, and #12 of 23 in Douglas County, meaning there are only 11 local options better than this facility. Unfortunately, the trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 5 in 2023 to 11 in 2024. Staffing is relatively stable with a turnover rate of 39%, below the state average, but their RN coverage is only average, which may impact the quality of care. While the facility has not incurred any fines, there have been serious deficiencies identified, including failure to monitor residents’ weight changes properly and inadequate attention to hydration needs, suggesting lapses in care that could affect residents' health. Overall, families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses carefully when considering this nursing home for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Nebraska
- #88/177
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 39% turnover. Near Nebraska's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 31 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Nebraska. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 34 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (39%)
9 points below Nebraska average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Nebraska average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Nebraska avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 34 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
11 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(J)(i)(1)
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to evaluate and implement interventions to prevent significant weight loss ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(J)(i)(1)
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of a significant weight loss for 1 (Resident 37) of 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(H)
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to report ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(D)
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(vi)(3)(g)
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility faile...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.09(H)(vi)(3)
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(iii)
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to update and re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 1.009.04(D)
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure safe water tempe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** F.
Record review of Resident 68's Clinical Census revealed an admission date of 5/27/2022.
Record review of Resident 68's MDS r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.19(B)
Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to maintain flooring in good repair for 12 resident rooms. This had the potential ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E)
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food items in the kitchen's refrigerators and freezers were sealed...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D1c
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care to Resident #84 to ensure that no bowel movement r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident #9), who was not a candidate for self-administrati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** D.
A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #53 on 11/02/2021 with diagnoses that included anxi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. A review of an admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #53 on 11/02/2021 with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, mood disorder, restlessness, and agitation.
A review of a q...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12E1
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility faile...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
18 deficiencies
3 Harm
SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** D. Record Review of Resident 17's weights revealed the following:
-6/23/2022 10:42
101.8 Lbs
-6/12/2022 13:32
101.8 Lbs
-6/2...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Administration
(Tag F0835)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 Chapter 12-006.02
Based on observations, record review and interview, the administrative and consultant staff failed to ensure the facility resources were utilized in a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC12-006.07
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the quality assurance program addressed concerns related to deficient practice cited o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER NAC 172 12-006.05 (4)
Based on record review and interview, the facility staff failed to ensure bathing preferences were honored for 1 resident (Resident 38) of 1 sampled re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(5)
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide 2 residents (Resident 7 and 44) or their representatives a letter explaining the r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide 2 residents ( Resident 44 and 65) or their representatives...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D2
Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to assess a skin problem for Resident 38 and failed to notify the physician (MD) f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D7b
Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility staff failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09D3
Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 54) received suprapubic catheter care (care of a flexible ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D6
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Oxygen was administered as ordered for 1 (Resident 19) of 1 reviewed. The facility cens...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.06C
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that call light...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006-18
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain fixtures, walls...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04B2
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete competencie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.17B
Based on observation, record review and interview; the facility failed to implemen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0923
(Tag F0923)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-007.04D
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ventilation system in resident bathrooms were operational in 9 (Rooms 119, 208, 209,...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0809
(Tag F0809)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11B
Based on observations, record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and gloving were performed in a manner to prevent the potential for food bo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0886
(Tag F0886)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff testing was completed in a manner to prevent the potential spread of Covid 19.
The findings are:
Observation of s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- • 39% turnover. Below Nebraska's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 34 deficiencies on record, including 4 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • Grade D (40/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Life Care Center Of Elkhorn's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Life Care Center of Elkhorn an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Staffed?
CMS rates Life Care Center of Elkhorn's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 39%, compared to the Nebraska average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Life Care Center Of Elkhorn?
State health inspectors documented 34 deficiencies at Life Care Center of Elkhorn during 2022 to 2024. These included: 4 that caused actual resident harm and 30 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Life Care Center Of Elkhorn?
Life Care Center of Elkhorn is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LIFE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 135 certified beds and approximately 93 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Elkhorn, Nebraska.
How Does Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Life Care Center of Elkhorn's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (39%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Life Care Center Of Elkhorn?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Life Care Center of Elkhorn has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Stick Around?
Life Care Center of Elkhorn has a staff turnover rate of 39%, which is about average for Nebraska nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Life Care Center Of Elkhorn Ever Fined?
Life Care Center of Elkhorn has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Life Care Center Of Elkhorn on Any Federal Watch List?
Life Care Center of Elkhorn is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.