Christian Homes Health Care Center
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Christian Homes Health Care Center in Holdrege, Nebraska has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerns. It ranks #140 out of 177 facilities in Nebraska, placing it in the bottom half, and #2 out of 3 in Phelps County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility is showing signs of improvement as it decreased from 11 issues in 2024 to 3 in 2025. Staffing is a concern with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 60%, which is higher than the state average. While there are no fines recorded, which is positive, the facility has had several issues, including employing unqualified dietary staff and failing to notify the state about changes in key personnel, both of which could impact resident care.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Nebraska
- #140/177
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Nebraska. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Nebraska average (2.9)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
14pts above Nebraska avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
12 points above Nebraska average of 48%
The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0802
(Tag F0802)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(H)
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to have qualified dietary staff working in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect all...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0844
(Tag F0844)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04 (E)
Findings are:
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the State Agency of a change in the Director of Nursing position wit...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)
Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for 1 (Resident 1) of 3 sampled residents. The facility censu...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2024
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(B)
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN, a required notice ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report a suspected...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.02(H)
The facility staff failed to investigate an alleged incident of abuse for 1 (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09B
Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Da...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(E)(i)
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and impl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** B). A record review of the admission record for Resident # 2 printed on [DATE]rd 2024 revealed that Resident # 2 was admitted to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** B. A record review of Resident # 62 admission Record with the printed date of 12/4/24 revealed Resident # 62 was admitted to the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** E. A record Review of admission record revealed Residents# 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Atria...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04(D)(i)
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to designate a licensed Registered Nurse (RN) to work full time hours as the Director of...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number NAC 12-006.05(6)
Based on record reivew, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the catheter drainage bag was covered to protect 1 (Resident 15) of 3 sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17
Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure C-PAP (CPAP or continuous positive airway pressure, is a respiratory th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.04C3a(5)
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.09D
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent complications related to edema (swelling) fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
LICENSURE REFERENCE NUMBER 175 NAC 12-006.18E
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure oxygen concentrators were turned off when they were not in use in the r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175NAC 12-006.11E
Based on observation, record review, and interview; the facility failed to ensure documentation of high temperature sanitation dishwasher (a dishwasher tha...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- • 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade D (40/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 60% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Christian Homes Health Care Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Christian Homes Health Care Center an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Christian Homes Health Care Center Staffed?
CMS rates Christian Homes Health Care Center's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 60%, which is 14 percentage points above the Nebraska average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Christian Homes Health Care Center?
State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at Christian Homes Health Care Center during 2023 to 2025. These included: 17 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Christian Homes Health Care Center?
Christian Homes Health Care Center is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 86 certified beds and approximately 70 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Holdrege, Nebraska.
How Does Christian Homes Health Care Center Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Christian Homes Health Care Center's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (60%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Christian Homes Health Care Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Christian Homes Health Care Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Christian Homes Health Care Center has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Christian Homes Health Care Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at Christian Homes Health Care Center is high. At 60%, the facility is 14 percentage points above the Nebraska average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 67%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Christian Homes Health Care Center Ever Fined?
Christian Homes Health Care Center has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Christian Homes Health Care Center on Any Federal Watch List?
Christian Homes Health Care Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.