Imperial Manor Nursing Home
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Imperial Manor Nursing Home has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerns. The facility ranks #121 out of 177 in Nebraska, placing it in the bottom half of nursing homes in the state, but it is the best option out of two facilities in Chase County. The facility is showing improvement, with issues decreasing from 12 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. Staffing is a positive aspect, as there is a 0% turnover rate, which is significantly better than the state average, although RN coverage is only average. However, the home has $7,903 in fines, which is higher than 76% of facilities in Nebraska, suggesting some compliance issues. Specific incidents of concern include unsafe food storage practices that could affect residents and a dietary aide not performing proper hand hygiene, which risks infection spread. Moreover, some nurse aides did not meet the required continuing education hours, which could impact the quality of care provided. Overall, while there are some strengths, the facility still has significant weaknesses that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Nebraska
- #121/177
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $7,903 in fines. Higher than 69% of Nebraska facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 38 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Nebraska. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below Nebraska average (2.9)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 22 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11(E)
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure foods were not stored on the floor and meats were not thawed above ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
12 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 1-005.01(G)
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to report to the State Agency and submit an investigation within 5 working days of an elopement for 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(c)(ii)
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to complete a significa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review; the facility failed to ensure an accurate Preadmission Screening and Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.09(F)(i)
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan (a written strategy for how nursing home staff will help a residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** B.
Record review of Resident 8's Face sheet revealed the resident admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: COPD, Unspeci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12- 006.09(H)
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to have a stop date for an antibiotic for 1 (Resident 3) of 5 sampled residents. The facility ident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Liscensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10 (D)
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure that 1 (Resident 6) of 7 sampled residents received an extended-rel...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.18(B)
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.18(D)
Based on observations, interview, and record reviews; the facility failed to don (put on) Personal Protective Equipmen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** D.
Record review of Resident 15's admission Record revealed the Resident admitted on [DATE] and subsequent diagnosis were listed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
A record review of a facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene, last revised 6/12/23, revealed hand hygiene using soap and water or alcohol-based hand rub should be performed, between resident contacts, an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0947
(Tag F0947)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-00604(B)(ii)
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.04(B)(ii)(1)
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides had completed at least 12 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to submit data for the third quarter of 2024 for the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a collection of staffing information and a requirement of al...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.12A
Based on observation, record review, and interviews; the facility and its Contracted Pharmacy failed to ensure that medications were available to be admin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.10D
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Observations of 27 medic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.17D
Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene when preparing and administering medications to 1 (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09C1c
Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a manner that prevents the potent...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0839
(Tag F0839)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure reference: 175 NAC 12-006.04C7a(2)
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 [Medication Aide A] of 4 sampled medication aides met requirements for a 40-hour medi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
License Reference number 12-006.02(8)
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report falls with injuries/suspected major injuries as potential neglect to the State Agency. This ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05(1)
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice-SNFABN ( a notice...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
License Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to serve food in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This had the ability to affect all residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 22 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Imperial Manor Nursing Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Imperial Manor Nursing Home an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Imperial Manor Nursing Home Staffed?
CMS rates Imperial Manor Nursing Home's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Imperial Manor Nursing Home?
State health inspectors documented 22 deficiencies at Imperial Manor Nursing Home during 2022 to 2025. These included: 21 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Imperial Manor Nursing Home?
Imperial Manor Nursing Home is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 58 certified beds and approximately 35 residents (about 60% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Imperial, Nebraska.
How Does Imperial Manor Nursing Home Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Imperial Manor Nursing Home's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.9 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Imperial Manor Nursing Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Imperial Manor Nursing Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Imperial Manor Nursing Home has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Imperial Manor Nursing Home Stick Around?
Imperial Manor Nursing Home has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Imperial Manor Nursing Home Ever Fined?
Imperial Manor Nursing Home has been fined $7,903 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Nebraska average of $33,158. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Imperial Manor Nursing Home on Any Federal Watch List?
Imperial Manor Nursing Home is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.