Florence Home
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Florence Home in Omaha, Nebraska has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #83 out of 177 nursing homes in Nebraska, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and #11 out of 23 in Douglas County, suggesting only a few local options are better. Unfortunately, the facility is trending worse, with issues increasing from 2 in the previous year to 6 this year, raising concerns about ongoing compliance. Staffing is a strength with a 4 out of 5-star rating, and a turnover rate of 48% is slightly below the state average, which means many staff members remain long-term and are familiar with the residents. The facility has no fines on record, which is a positive sign, but there are some concerning incidents, such as failure to properly store food, which could lead to contamination, and inadequate cleaning of kitchen equipment, posing risks for foodborne illness for residents. Overall, while Florence Home has some strengths, such as good staffing and no fines, families should weigh these against the increasing number of compliance issues.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Nebraska
- #83/177
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 45 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Nebraska. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Nebraska average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Nebraska avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
The Ugly 16 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09 (F)(iii)
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise 1 (Resident 56) of 1 resident Care Plan related to NPO (nothing by mouth)statu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.02(09(H)(v)
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(iv)(1)
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide catheter care for 1 (Resident 5) of 3 sampled residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** C.
Record review of Resident 44 Profile Face Sheet revealed an admission date of 4/17/2022. Resident 44 diagnosis include: Alzh...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12.006.11(E)
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0620
(Tag F0620)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview; the facility failed to ensure its admission policy did not waive the potential liability f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.04C3a(6)
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to no...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain walls, safety s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2022
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.06B
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to ensure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.05
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure compression stockings for Resident 33 were applied daily as per the phys...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor daily weights per the Physician's order for 1 (Resident 53)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18A(1)
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain walls, vent...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09D7a
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18E4
Based on observation, interview, and record review; the facility failed to transfer Resident 33 with a Ga...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0914
(Tag F0914)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-007.03R
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure full visual privacy was maintained as evidenced by no privacy curtains present in 20 (ro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.11E
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the floors, the ice maker vents, the top of the ice maker, and ventilation system vent a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- • 16 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Florence Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Florence Home an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Florence Home Staffed?
CMS rates Florence Home's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the Nebraska average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Florence Home?
State health inspectors documented 16 deficiencies at Florence Home during 2022 to 2024. These included: 16 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Florence Home?
Florence Home is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 126 certified beds and approximately 74 residents (about 59% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in OMAHA, Nebraska.
How Does Florence Home Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, Florence Home's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Florence Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Florence Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Florence Home has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Florence Home Stick Around?
Florence Home has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for Nebraska nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Florence Home Ever Fined?
Florence Home has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Florence Home on Any Federal Watch List?
Florence Home is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.