SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
SRMC Long Term Care, LLC, also known as Pole Creek Estates, has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice among nursing homes, but not the top tier. It ranks #97 out of 177 facilities in Nebraska, placing it in the bottom half, yet it is the only option in Cheyenne County. The facility is improving, with a decrease in issues from six in 2024 to five in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, rated 4 out of 5 stars, and while turnover is at 49%, it matches the state average. Notably, there have been no fines, which is a positive sign. However, recent inspections revealed concerns such as improper glove use during meal service, which could lead to cross-contamination, and inadequate handwashing practices by staff, risking potential infection spread. Families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses when considering this facility for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Nebraska
- #97/177
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 49% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 36 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Nebraska. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Nebraska average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Nebraska avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0605
(Tag F0605)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H) Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(C)(ii) Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS, a fe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(v)Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to pro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0744
(Tag F0744)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09(H)(vi) and 175 NAC 12-006.14Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance with eating and administration of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(B)Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.18(D) Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews; the facility failed to ensure staff followed prope...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference Number 175 NAC 12-006.09
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide ongoing care and services to address 1 (Resident 42) of 1 sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary antibiotic use for 2 (Resident 1 and 29) of 3 sampled residents. The facility census was 43. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Licensure Reference 175 NAC 12-006.10D
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews; the facility failed to administer medications at the right time for 2 (Resident 6 and 33) out of 9 sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
B. A record review of the facility's policy Care Plan with an approved date of 5/15/2024 revealed the comprehensive care plan will describe at a minimum any services that are to be furnished to attain...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Licensure Reference 12-006.11E
Based on observations, interviews, and record review; the facility failed to a) ensure food products were disposed of prior to expiration dates, b) utilize handwashing a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
B.
A record review of the facility's policy Hand Hygiene with a last reviewed date of 4/18/2024 revealed hand hygiene with soap should be completed for at least 20 seconds.
An observation on 5/23/2024...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Licensure reference number
175 NAC 12-006.09D
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Nebraska facilities.
- • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Nebraska, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates Staffed?
CMS rates SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 49%, compared to the Nebraska average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates during 2023 to 2025. These included: 12 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates?
SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 61 certified beds and approximately 59 residents (about 97% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Sidney, Nebraska.
How Does Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates Compare to Other Nebraska Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Nebraska, SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (49%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Nebraska. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates Stick Around?
SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates has a staff turnover rate of 49%, which is about average for Nebraska nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates Ever Fined?
SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Srmc Long Term Care, Llc Dba Pole Creek Estates on Any Federal Watch List?
SRMC Long Term Care, LLC dba Pole Creek Estates is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.