New Mexico State Veterans Home
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
The New Mexico State Veterans Home has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #35 out of 67 facilities in New Mexico, placing it in the bottom half, and #1 out of 2 in Sierra County, meaning there is only one other local option available. The facility's situation is worsening, with reported issues increasing from 17 in 2023 to 18 in 2024. Staffing is a concern, with a turnover rate of 78%, significantly higher than the state average, and it has less RN coverage than 98% of other facilities, which may lead to gaps in care. Specific incidents include failures to ensure CPR procedures were in place for all residents, a diabetic resident not being provided necessary equipment which led to a hospital admission, and lapses in infection control practices, highlighting serious safety risks alongside the facility's average ratings in overall quality.
- Trust Score
- F
- In New Mexico
- #35/67
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 78% turnover. Very high, 30 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $44,226 in fines. Higher than 60% of New Mexico facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 18 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for New Mexico. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 64 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near New Mexico average (2.9)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
32pts above New Mexico avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
30 points above New Mexico average of 48%
The Ugly 64 deficiencies on record
Dec 2024
13 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0742
(Tag F0742)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate mental health services for 2 (R #62 and R #70) of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0572
(Tag F0572)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were aware of changes to thei...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative of a transfer...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and their representatives received a written notic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review the facility failed to ensure the annual Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS; a standardized, comprehensive assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS; a standardized, comprehensive assessment of an adult's functional, medical, psychosocial, and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 4 (R #18, R #48, R #51 and R #87) of 4 (R #18, R #48, R #51 and R #87) resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0660
(Tag F0660)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop the resident's individualized discharge goals and needs for 1 (R #100) of 1 (R #100) resident reviewed for discharge planning. This...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff completed a discharge summary that included a recapitulation (a summary describing the resident's course of treatment while re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment to maintain hearing for 1 (R #78) of 3 (R #69, R #73, and R #78) residents reviewed for vision a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote resident self-determination (the ability to make your own choices and decisions without being controlled by others) for 1 (R #18) o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan requirements were met for 11 (R #4, R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Dental Services
(Tag F0791)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents obtained dental services for 1 (R #6...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an accurate baseline care plan (a document with the minimum ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain proper infection prevention measures when they failed to initiate transmission-based precautions (used to prevent th...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS; a federally mandated ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission, that in...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
17 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 1 (R #23...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate residents needs for 1(R #35) of 2 (R #1 and R #35) reviewed for medical appointments. If the facility is not honorin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician for 1 (R #191) of 2 (R #35 and R #191) residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0740
(Tag F0740)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #14) of 3 (R #14, R #23, and R #36) residents reviewed for behavioral-emotional health were receiving necessa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents and representatives were informed of and part...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment (complete assessment that include...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 19 (R #1, R #3, R #5, R #7, R #10, R #12, R #13, R #15, R #17, R #19, R #20, R #22, R #23, R #24, R #28, R #32, R #38, R #39, R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 3 (R #18, R #25 and R #35) of 7 (R #1, R #6, R #18, R #25, R #33, R #35...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 (R #35 and R #242) of 6 (R #1, R #6, R #33, R #35, R #191 and R #242) residents reviewed for care plan revisions...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care that meets professional standards for 1 (R #1) of 1 (R #1) resident sampled for limited range o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and treatment in accordance wit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were receiving rehabilitative services, PT (Physical therapy is the treatment of disease, injury, or deformity by physical...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the physician reviewed and addressed pharmacy recommendations for 2 (R #25 and R #35) of 5 (R #8, R #18, R #25, R #33, and R #3...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents did not receive antipsychotic (drug primarily used to treat psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia [mental disorder cha...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was 5% or less when medications were given late or not given at all for 3 (R #5, R #6, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates resident preferences for 7 (R #2, R #8, R #20, R #34, R #35, R #91 and R #244) of 7 (R #2, R #8, R #20, R #3...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain appropriate staffing levels to meet the needs of the reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
29 deficiencies
3 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and, record review the facility failed to ensure there was a functional system in place to ensur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide quality of care for 1 (R #27) of 1 (R #27) resident reviewed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they maintained an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) when they failed to:
1. Provide process surveillan...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Findings for R #318:
BB. Record review of R #318's Face Sheet no date revealed the admission date of 11/09/17.
CC. Record revie...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(H)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0740
(Tag F0740)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper care and treatment to meet their needs for 1 ( R #30) of 1 (R #30) resident reviewed fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences for 1 (R #49) of 2 (R #'s 15 and 49) residents reviewed by not assistin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep residents free from physical restraints for 1 (R #19) of 1 (R #19) resident randomly sampled, when staff used the reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 (R #35) of 2 (R #35 and R #37) residents noted to have impaired hearing was aided to find a mean of communicati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment to promote healing of pressure ulcers for 1 (R #27) of 1 (R #27) residents sampled for pressure ulcers, when...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently offer water for 1 (R #30) of 1 (R #30) resident sampled for hydration. This deficient practice could likely resu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician accurately documented in the resident's medical record his or her rationale for not following the phar...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep resident free from significant medication errors for 1 (R #3) of 1 (R #3) resident randomly sampled, when they failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0790
(Tag F0790)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interview the facility failed to ensure dental services were obtained for 1 (R #64) of 3 (R #22, R #30 and R #64) reviewed for dental services. This deficient practice can resu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with respect and dignity for 8 (R #6, R #7, R #8, R#15, R #19, R #25, R #38, and R #46 ) of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate resident's needs and preferences for 2 (R #19 and R #30) of 2 (R #19 and R #30) resident sampled for a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable home-like environment for every resident who resides in the annex building by using Styrofoam /disposable plates and pl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan and implement interventions for 7 (R #3, R #7, R #19, R #20, R #37, R #42 a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 4 (R #19, R #20, R #27, and R #318) of 9 (...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of care for 2 (R #49 and 57) of 2 (R #49 and 57) residents reviewed by not labeling and dating oxy...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document and provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living; fundamental skills required to care for oneself such as eati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activities program designed to mee...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper pain management for 2 (R #11 and 50) of 2 (R #11 and 50) residents reviewed for pain management by not:
1. Ass...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, the facility failed to properly store medications for all 26 residents on D, and E units (resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documents in resident records were complete and accurate for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 2 (R #50 and R #56) of 5 (R #4, R #23, R #50, R #56, and R #66) residents reviewed for Pneumococcal (infection caused by bacte...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions by not:
1. Ensuring food items in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage were properly lab...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a functional antibiotic stewardship program (a coordinated program that promotes the appropriate use of antimicrobials [includ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0943
(Tag F0943)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff received training for abuse, neglect, and exploitation for 4 Staff (RN #11, RN #12, CNA #11 and CNA #13) of 6 Staff (RN #...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have the most recent survey results in a place that was readily accessible for residents (R) in wheelchairs or residents that were not tall e...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), 3 harm violation(s), $44,226 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 64 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $44,226 in fines. Higher than 94% of New Mexico facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is New Mexico State Veterans Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns New Mexico State Veterans Home an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within New Mexico, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is New Mexico State Veterans Home Staffed?
CMS rates New Mexico State Veterans Home's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 78%, which is 32 percentage points above the New Mexico average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 95%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at New Mexico State Veterans Home?
State health inspectors documented 64 deficiencies at New Mexico State Veterans Home during 2022 to 2024. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 3 that caused actual resident harm, 57 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates New Mexico State Veterans Home?
New Mexico State Veterans Home is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 135 certified beds and approximately 123 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Truth or Consequences, New Mexico.
How Does New Mexico State Veterans Home Compare to Other New Mexico Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New Mexico, New Mexico State Veterans Home's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (78%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting New Mexico State Veterans Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is New Mexico State Veterans Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, New Mexico State Veterans Home has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New Mexico. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at New Mexico State Veterans Home Stick Around?
Staff turnover at New Mexico State Veterans Home is high. At 78%, the facility is 32 percentage points above the New Mexico average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 95%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was New Mexico State Veterans Home Ever Fined?
New Mexico State Veterans Home has been fined $44,226 across 1 penalty action. The New Mexico average is $33,521. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is New Mexico State Veterans Home on Any Federal Watch List?
New Mexico State Veterans Home is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.