ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN

29 01 216 STREET, BAYSIDE, NY 11360 (718) 281-8800
Non profit - Corporation 124 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#104 of 594 in NY
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

St. Mary’s Hospital for Children in Bayside, New York, has an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and performs well compared to other facilities. It ranks #104 out of 594 facilities statewide, placing it in the top half, and #11 out of 57 in Queens County, suggesting only ten local options are better. The facility's trend is stable, with three issues reported for both 2023 and 2025, signaling no worsening conditions. Staffing is a concern here, receiving a poor rating of 0 out of 5 stars, but it has an impressive turnover rate of 0%, meaning staff remain long-term. There have been no fines, which is a positive sign, and while RN coverage data is not available, the lack of critical or serious issues is reassuring. However, specific incidents of concern include a resident not receiving necessary mobility equipment, a lack of mental health screening for a newly admitted resident, and a failure to maintain the dignity of another resident regarding ostomy care. These weaknesses highlight areas for improvement despite the facility's overall strong performance in other areas.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In New York
#104/594
Top 17%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Holding Steady
1 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

No Significant Concerns Identified

This facility shows no red flags. Among New York's 100 nursing homes, only 0% achieve this.

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

Feb 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 02/05/2025 to 02/12/2025, t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 02/05/2025 to 02/12/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment, and assistance to maintain, improve, or prevent avoidable decline in range of motion and mobility. This was evident in 1 (Resident #18) of 3 residents reviewed for Limited Range of Motion, out of 25 sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #18 who had a physician's order to apply bilateral wrist cock-up splints was observed on multiple occasions without the splint applied. The findings are: The facility's policy titled Osteopenia with a revised date of 06/2024 documented that the facility will screen and provide assessments upon admission and at least quarterly of all residents with potential/actual diagnosis of osteopenia. Safe handling guidelines, as outlined, should be always practiced. The policy documented that appropriate physical and occupational therapy evaluation will be ordered. The Rehabilitation Services Department will make recommendations regarding orthotic and/or positioning devices such as splints, braces, supine stander, wedges and followed by physician's orders. Nursing will ensure that appropriate care plans are identified, and interventions are implemented. Resident #18 had diagnoses which include Spastic Quadriplegic Cerebral Palsy, Epilepsy, and Encounter for Attention to Tracheostomy. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #18's cognitive status was severely impaired. The Minimum Data Set assessment also documented that Resident #18 had impairments on both sides of upper extremity and required total assistance with grooming. A Comprehensive Care Plan for Musculoskeletal Care dated 06/25/2023 with a last reviewed date of 12/22/2024 documented the following interventions: perform musculoskeletal assessment every shift, implement osteopenia protocol, assess for sign and symptom of functional weakness/paralysis, and perform restorative nursing care, such as the use of assistive devices. A physician's order dated 08/09/2024 documented orders for right and left wrist cock-up splints to apply all daytime, from 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM. During observations made on 02/05/2025, 02/06/2025, 02/07/2025 and 02/10/2025, between the hours of 09:45 AM to 12:00 PM. Resident #18 was observed in bed, alert and awake. The Resident was confused and nonverbal, was observed with weakness to bilateral wrists. There was no bilateral wrist cock-up splints applied. On 02/10/2025 at 11:15 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant #1 who was assigned to Resident #18. Certified Nursing Assistant #1 stated they were aware of the order for the wrist splint and that it was not applied because it was communicated by the Rehabilitation Services Department to only apply the wrist splint when Resident #18 is out of bed. On 02/10/2025 at 11:21 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse #1 who stated they are responsible for clinical aspects of resident care. Registered Nurse #1 stated that Resident #18's wrist cock-up splint is normally applied when the Resident is out of bed. They stated that Resident #18 cannot have the splint for 12 hours because their skin was too fragile. On 02/10/2025 at 11:45 AM, an interview was conducted with Occupational Therapist #1. They stated they recommend splint devices after conducting assessments. Occupational Therapist #1 stated that the cock-up splints are to be applied to the resident's wrist to maintain joint integrity and to prevent further contractures. On 02/11/2025 at 10:10 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing who stated that the Rehabilitation Service Department and physicians are responsible for the assessment and recommendation of splint devices and nursing staff implements them. The Director of Nursing stated if a resident cannot tolerate the splint, it needs to be communicated with the physician so the order can be adjusted. The Director of Nursing stated that the wrist cock-up splints order for Resident #18 has to be applied all day from 8:00 AM - 8:00 PM as stated in the physician's order. 10 NYCRR 415.12 (e)(2)
Nov 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview during the recertification survey conducted from 11/8/2023 to 11/16/2023, the facilit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview during the recertification survey conducted from 11/8/2023 to 11/16/2023, the facility did not ensure each resident received preadmission screening for a mental disorder or intellectual disability. This was evident for 1 (Resident #99) of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #99 did not have a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) completed prior to their admission to the facility. The findings are: The facility policy titled PASRR Screen dated 12/2022 documented the PASARR Screen for all residents will be reviewed prior to their admission to protect their rights and ensure the identification and delivery of specialized developmental and mental health services. Resident #99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure and ventilator dependence. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #99 was severely cognitively impaired and admitted from an acute hospital on 8/3/2023. There was no documented evidence a Level 1 PASARR was completed prior to Resident #99 being admitted to the facility. On 11/10/2023 at 12:57 PM, the admission Director (AD) was interviewed and stated that Resident #99 was admitted to the facility without a Level 1 PASARR because they were admitted from a hospital in New Jersey. On 11/16/2023 at 2:03 PM, the Director of Patient/Family Services (DPS) was interviewed and stated Level 1 PASARRs were completed by referring facilities and received prior to a resident's admission to the facility. The DPS was unable to obtain a Level 1 PASARR for Resident #99 prior to their admission to the facility because the PASARR is not required in New Jersey. 10 NYCRR 415.11(e)
Sept 2021 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure that...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the Recertification Survey, the facility did not ensure that residents were cared for in a manner that maintained or enhanced their dignity. Specifically, a resident's Ileostomy drainage bag and tubing were observed several times uncovered and exposed to public view in the hallway. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Dignity out of a sample of 28 residents (Resident #106). The finding is: The facility policy dated Colostomy/Ileostomy Care dated 10/2019 documented the following: It is the policy of the facility that the licensed nurse is responsible for the care of the resident who has an ostomy. The Policy also documented that the licensed nurse would provide stoma care while changing the ostomy pouch and provide privacy. Resident #106 had diagnoses which include Ileostomy, GI Dysmotility, and Hereditary and Idiopathic Neuropathy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had an impaired cognition and required total assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). On 09/02/21, between the hours of 11:43 AM and 12:45 PM, Resident #106 was observed sitting in a wheelchair (w/c) in the hallway, in front of the nurse's station. The resident's Ileostomy drainage bag and tubing were uncovered and visible. There were feces along the tubing and in the drainage bag attached to lower side of the w/c. On 09/03/21, between the hours of at 10:42 AM and 11:57 AM, Resident #106 was observed being fed by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1) while sitting in a w/c, in the hallway, in front of the nurse's station. The resident's Ileostomy drainage bag and tubing were uncovered and visible. There were feces along the tubing and in the drainage bag attached to lower side of the w/c. On 09/07/21 at 09:49 AM, Resident #106 was observed in front of the nursing station,with an unidentified staff member. The Ileostomy bag was uncovered with feces inside. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) for Bowel Elimination Alteration dated 08/12/21 documented Resident #106 required actual maintenance of any gastrointestinal diversional device attached to the child's body for elimination of waste related to medical diagnoses (ileostomy, GI dysmotility, intestinal malabsorption). The CCP interventions included the following: Perform bowel assessment and abdominal palpation for distention every shift, identify location of gastrointestinal diversion, perform skin assessment every shift, monitor output and frequency, change devices as ordered and PRN (as needed). The Physician's order dated 07/30/21, renewed on 09/09/21, documented the following: Ostomy care: Change ostomy daily and as needed (PRN). Cleanse with normal saline and dry well. The Physician's note dated 8/27/21 documented the following: Resident has a long history of dysmotility. Ileostomy was placed 2 years ago. There is a red rubber catheter placed within the ostomy to promote drainage. A series of 8-10 slits made along the length of the catheter to promote drainage and prevent clogging with stool. Catheter is inserted to 75% of its length. Typical drainage is less than 300 ml per shift (q12 h) but if the output is greater than this, it should be replaced 1:1 with lactated ringers' solution. On 09/07/21 at 10:44 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA #1. CNA #1 stated that the nurse takes care of the ostomy bag. The CNAs make sure the ileostomy bag is cleaned properly and not clogged, and the nurse drains it and measures and documents the output. CNA #1 stated she was never aware of the privacy issues related to the ostomy bag being exposed to the public view. CNA #1 concluded by saying I never received such training that the ostomy or catheter bags have to be covered in public. ] On 09/07/21 at 10:25 AM, an interview was conducted with the Unit Registered Nurse (RN#1) who stated she was not aware of the need for a privacy bag for the ileostomy. RN #1 stated that Resident #106 always sits in the hallway, and no one has said anything about the ileostomy drainage bag being exposed. On 09/07/21 at 10:53 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the facility does not have privacy bags for the ostomy. The DON stated the facility has a few residents with an ostomy bag. The DON stated that the staff were not trained on the use of a privacy bag to conceal the ostomy from public view. The DON concluded by saying we will work on it. 415.5(a)
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in New York.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
  • • Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is St Marys Hospital For Children's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within New York, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is St Marys Hospital For Children Staffed?

Detailed staffing data for ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN is not available in the current CMS dataset.

What Have Inspectors Found at St Marys Hospital For Children?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN during 2021 to 2025. These included: 3 with potential for harm.

Who Owns and Operates St Marys Hospital For Children?

ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 124 certified beds and approximately 120 residents (about 97% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in BAYSIDE, New York.

How Does St Marys Hospital For Children Compare to Other New York Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New York, ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1 and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting St Marys Hospital For Children?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is St Marys Hospital For Children Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New York. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at St Marys Hospital For Children Stick Around?

ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was St Marys Hospital For Children Ever Fined?

ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is St Marys Hospital For Children on Any Federal Watch List?

ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.