OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation Care Center has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some significant concerns. It ranks #542 out of 594 facilities in New York, placing it in the bottom half of all nursing homes in the state. Although the facility is showing signs of improvement, as the number of issues decreased from 10 in 2023 to 9 in 2025, the overall rating is still concerning. Staffing is a strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, which is well below the New York average, but the facility has a low overall star rating of 1 out of 5 and a health inspection rating of only 2 out of 5. There have been specific incidents, such as failing to adequately sanitize blood pressure cuffs between residents, which poses an infection risk, and improper sanitation procedures in the kitchen that could lead to foodborne illnesses.
- Trust Score
- D
- In New York
- #542/594
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- RN staffing data not reported for this facility.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below New York average (3.0)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
The Ugly 21 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
9 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nur...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during Recertification Survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025 the facility did not ensure safe food storage was practiced. This was evident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure that the Medical Director consistently participated or atten...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure Minimum Data Set assessments were electronically transmitte...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey conducted from 03/02/2025 to 03/07/2025, the facility did not ensure the daily nurse staffing information included...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
10 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0568
(Tag F0568)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, during the recertification survey 10/2/23 through 10/11/23, the facility did not ensure th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Room [NAME] 5, observed the floor in room appeared dull with multiple blacken linear marks on the floor. Resident stated it coul...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey conducted from 10/02/23 to 10/11...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview during the Recertification and Complaint survey (NY 00306641) ,the facility did not ensure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification survey of 10/2/23 through 10/11/2...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification and abbreviated survey of 10/2/23 through 10/11/23, t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interview, during the Recertification survey , the facility did not ensure that re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification and Complaint survey conducted 10/02/2023 to 10/11/2023, the facility did not ensure the Director of Nursing (D...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interviews, and record review conducted during the Recertification survey of 10/2/23 through 10/11/23, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview conducted during the recertification survey the facility did not ensure an ef...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2021
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** (2) Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Anemia and End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD).
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, record review, and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure proper sanitation procedures were followed for the prevention of foodborne illn...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
- • 21 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • Grade D (40/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within New York, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation Staffed?
CMS rates OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation?
State health inspectors documented 21 deficiencies at OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER during 2021 to 2025. These included: 18 with potential for harm and 3 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation?
OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 102 certified beds and approximately 96 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in FAR ROCKAWAY, New York.
How Does Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation Compare to Other New York Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New York, OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.0 and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in New York. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation Stick Around?
OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation Ever Fined?
OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Oceanview Nursing & Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?
OCEANVIEW NURSING & REHABILITATION CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.