MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Meadow Park Rehabilitation and Health Center has a Trust Grade of B, which means it is considered a good choice for care, though there may be some areas for improvement. It ranks #299 out of 594 facilities in New York, placing it in the bottom half, and #35 out of 57 in Queens County, indicating that there are better local options available. The facility's trend is stable, with four issues reported in both 2024 and 2025, but it has some concerning incidents, such as failing to post important information about the state health complaint hotline and not adequately accommodating residents' dietary preferences. Staffing is a relative strength, with a low turnover rate of 21%, which is well below the New York average, though the overall staffing rating is below average at 2 out of 5 stars. Notably, the facility has not incurred any fines, which is a positive sign, but it does have average RN coverage, meaning there is room for improvement in nursing staff availability.
- Trust Score
- B
- In New York
- #299/594
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 21% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 27 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 28 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for New York. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (21%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (21%)
27 points below New York average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Near New York average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00336488), the facility did not en...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and interviews conducted during an Abbreviated Survey (NY00336488), the facility did not ensure that the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00336488), the facility did not ensure that all ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during an abbreviated survey (NY00355163), the facility failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review conducted during Recertification and Complaint investigations (NY00332356), the facility d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interviews conducted during the Recertification/Complaint Survey from 3/26/24 to 4...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/26/2024 to 4/02/2024, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals were safe and secure to protect fro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 3/26/2024 to 4/02/2024, the facility did not ensure food was prepared and served in accordance wit...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2019
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews conducted during the re-certification survey, the facility did not ens...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and staff interview during the re-certification survey, the facility did not ensure garbage and refuse containers by the loading dock were kept clean, free of foul odors, and in ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews during the re-certification survey, the facility did not ensure an inf...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and resident and staff interviews during the re-certification survey, the facility did not provide reasonable accommodation of resident's needs and preferences to ensure residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0575
(Tag F0575)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations and staff interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure pertinent state agency information had been posted as required. Specifically, the New York Dep...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
- • 21% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 27 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within New York, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C Staffed?
CMS rates MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 21%, compared to the New York average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C during 2019 to 2025. These included: 13 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C?
MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BENJAMIN LANDA, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 135 certified beds and approximately 127 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in FLUSHING, New York.
How Does Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C Compare to Other New York Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New York, MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (21%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in New York. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C Stick Around?
Staff at MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 21%, the facility is 24 percentage points below the New York average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 29%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C Ever Fined?
MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Meadow Park Rehabilitation And L L C on Any Federal Watch List?
MEADOW PARK REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER L L C is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.