JEFFERSON'S FERRY

500 MATHER DRIVE, SOUTH SETAUKET, NY 11720 (631) 650-2700
Non profit - Corporation 60 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#53 of 594 in NY
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Jefferson's Ferry in South Setauket, New York, has a Trust Grade of A, which indicates that it is highly recommended and considered excellent. It ranks #53 out of 594 facilities in New York, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 41 in Suffolk County, meaning there are only two better options locally. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from one in 2024 to none in 2025. Staffing is rated 5 out of 5 stars, although the turnover rate of 52% is concerning, as it is higher than the New York average of 40%. There have been no fines reported, which is a positive sign, and the facility has more registered nurse coverage than 76% of New York facilities, ensuring that important health issues are addressed. However, there are some weaknesses, including a finding where food was not served at a safe temperature, which poses a risk to residents. Additionally, the facility failed to implement a contingency plan for unvaccinated staff, which could impact infection control efforts. Overall, while Jefferson's Ferry has many strengths, families should be aware of these specific concerns.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In New York
#53/594
Top 8%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
1 → 0 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 73 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of New York nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★★
5.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 1 issues
2025: 0 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 52%

Near New York avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

The Ugly 2 deficiencies on record

May 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/28/2024, and completed on 5/31/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was served at a safe and...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 5/28/2024, and completed on 5/31/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified for one (Unit 2 West) of two residents during the Dining Task. Specifically, the facility did not monitor the food temperatures of cold foods served to the residents. During a lunch meal observation on Unit 2 West, a tray of key lime pie with whipped cream measured a temperature of 66.5 degrees Fahrenheit. The finding is: An undated facility policy and procedure titled Log Recording and Thermometer Possession Culinary Management documented all food temperatures to be taken and logged immediately when food arrived at the designated unit. If food is in the Danger Zone (40-140 degrees Fahrenheit), the Executive Chef is to be contacted immediately to ensure the concern is corrected. The Unit 2 [NAME] temperature logs were reviewed. Only the hot food temperatures were recorded on the log sheet. The cold food temperatures were not noted for the first two weeks of May 2024. During the lunch meal observation on 5/28/2024 at 12:30 PM a tray containing multiple individual plates of key lime pie with whipped cream for the Unit 2 [NAME] residents was observed. The Assistant Director of Culinary Services was interviewed on 5/28/2024 at the time of the observation and they stated that the Dietary Supervisors are responsible for taking the food temperatures in the dining room on the units. The Assistant Director of Culinary Services acknowledged that the food temperature logs for Unit 2 [NAME] only included hot food temperatures; cold food temperatures were not noted for the first two weeks of May 2024. The Assistant Director of Culinary Services stated that cold foods include milk, juice, pie, pudding, and sandwiches stated that they do not take the temperature of the cold foods. On 5/28/2024 at 12:40 PM, at the request of the Surveyor, the Culinary Manager took the temperature of the key lime pie. The temperature registered 66.5 degrees Fahrenheit. The Culinary Manager stated that 66.5 degrees Fahrenheit temperature was too hot for any cold food item and the facility was not in compliance with temperature controls. The Director of Culinary Operations was interviewed on 5/31/2024 at 10:36 AM and stated that the facility's policy for food temperatures included taking temperatures of hot food at multiple points in time; including at final production, before being placed in the transport box, and then when transferred to the unit's steam table. The Director of Culinary Operations acknowledged that no cold food temperatures were being recorded on the temperature logs. The Director of Culinary Operations further stated that they use ice blankets under the cold food items, and it appeared to be insufficient. The [NAME] President of Culinary Operations was interviewed on 5/31/2024 at 11:32 AM and stated that temperature checks must be performed for cold items, such as desserts, pies, milk, tuna/chicken salad, coleslaw, and mayonnaise-based foods. They further stated that there is no excuse for not taking the temperatures of the cold foods. 10 NYCRR 415.14(d)(1)(2)
Aug 2022 1 deficiency
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0888 (Tag F0888)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interviews and record review, during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/24/2022 and completed on 8/30/2022, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review, during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/24/2022 and completed on 8/30/2022, the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure a contingency plan for staff who are not fully vaccinated to mitigate the transmission and spread of COVID-19. This was identified for one [Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1] of one unvaccinated, medically exempted, staff reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination. Specifically, the facility policy and procedure did not include a contingency plan for staff who are not fully vaccinated. Additionally, LPN #1's medical exemption form did not specify which authorized or licensed COVID-19 vaccine is clinically contraindicated for the staff member. The finding is: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) QSO 22-07-ALL Attachment A for Long Term Care and Skilled Nursing Facility dated 12/28/2021, and last updated 4/05/2022, requires facilities to ensure those staff who are not yet fully vaccinated, or who have a pending or been granted an exemption, or who have a temporary delay as recommended by the CDC, adhere to additional precautions that are intended to mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Accommodations of Unvaccinated Staff with a qualifying exception could include mandatory routine COVID-19 testing in accordance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and CDC guidelines, physical distancing from co-workers and patients, re-assignment or modifications of duties, teleworking, or a combination of these actions. Accommodations can be addressed in the facility's policies and procedures. The facility's Policy and Procedure titled, COVID Vaccination Policy dated 8/26/2021, documented employees were required to be up to date with the COVID-19 vaccination as of September 27, 2021. The Policy and Procedure did not document additional precautions for those personnel with approved medical exemptions to prevent the spread of COVID -19 infection. A review of the COVID-19 staff vaccination matrix received on 8/29/2022 indicated there was one staff member, LPN #1, with a medical exemption for the COVID-19 vaccine. Review of the Request for Exemption from COVID-19 Vaccination Mandate Based on Medical Reasons form dated 9/8/2022 did not include which authorized or licensed COVID-19 vaccine is clinically contraindicated for LPN #1. LPN #1 was interviewed on 8/30/2022 at 10:21 AM and stated they (LPN#1) were medically exempt from the COVID-19 vaccination and were using a surgical mask when on the nursing units and providing resident care. LPN #1 stated they (LPN #1) are currently wearing an N95 mask because of the COVID -19 outbreak of two COVID-19 positive residents in the facility. The Director of Nursing Services (DNS), who is also the Infection Control Preventionist, was interviewed on 8/30/2022 at 11:45 AM. The DNS stated that the facility currently had two COVID-19 positive residents in the facility as of 8/26/2022. The DNS stated all staff are required to wear a surgical mask when in the facility unless the community rate increases. When the community rate for COVID-19 increases then all staff are required to wear an N95 mask covered by a surgical mask and must wear goggles. The Medical exempt staff are required to wear a surgical mask and eyeglasses (if needed) and are swabbed twice a week for COVID-19 infection. The DNS stated they were not aware that the facility policy should include contingency plans for staff who are not vaccinated. 10 NYCRR 415.19(a)(1-3)
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in New York.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most New York facilities.
  • • Only 2 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Jefferson'S Ferry's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns JEFFERSON'S FERRY an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within New York, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Jefferson'S Ferry Staffed?

CMS rates JEFFERSON'S FERRY's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the New York average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Jefferson'S Ferry?

State health inspectors documented 2 deficiencies at JEFFERSON'S FERRY during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.

Who Owns and Operates Jefferson'S Ferry?

JEFFERSON'S FERRY is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 44 residents (about 73% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SOUTH SETAUKET, New York.

How Does Jefferson'S Ferry Compare to Other New York Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New York, JEFFERSON'S FERRY's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Jefferson'S Ferry?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Jefferson'S Ferry Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, JEFFERSON'S FERRY has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in New York. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Jefferson'S Ferry Stick Around?

JEFFERSON'S FERRY has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the New York average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Jefferson'S Ferry Ever Fined?

JEFFERSON'S FERRY has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Jefferson'S Ferry on Any Federal Watch List?

JEFFERSON'S FERRY is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.