ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Adira at Riverside Rehabilitation and Nursing has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average care and some concerning issues. With a state rank of #372 out of 594, they are in the bottom half of New York facilities, and #28 of 42 in Westchester County means only a few local options are worse. The facility's situation is worsening, with the number of issues rising from 1 in 2022 to 11 in 2024. Staffing is a relative strength, rated at 3 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 25%, which is better than the state average, but residents have reported insufficient staffing at times, leading to delayed responses to call bells. Additionally, the facility has incurred $66,859 in fines, indicating repeated compliance problems, and a serious incident involved a resident developing an unstageable pressure ulcer due to inadequate care, highlighting significant concerns about resident safety and care standards.
- Trust Score
- D
- In New York
- #372/594
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $66,859 in fines. Higher than 94% of New York facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 101 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of New York nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (25%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (25%)
23 points below New York average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below New York average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
11 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, observation and record review during a Recertification Survey conducted from 8/26/2024 through 8/30/2024, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received care, consistent wi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record reviews and interviews during the recertification and abbreviated survey (NY00325832) from 8/26/24 to 8/30/24 , the facility did not ensure that a resident's representative was promptl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations record review and interviews, during the recertification survey from 8/25/24 to 8/30/24, the facility did not ensure that the Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interviews during the recertification survey from 8/26/24-8/30/24, the facility di...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey from 8/26/2024 to 8/30/2024, the facility d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY00336677) from (8/26-8/30/24), the facility did not ensure that food was stor...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review, and interviews during a Recertification Survey (8/26/24-8/30/24), the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 08/26/24 to 08/30/24, the facility did not ensure each resident was offered pneumococcal immunizations and received edu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review during the recertification survey conducted 08/26/24-8/30/24, the facility did not ensure each staff and resident was screened, offered the COVID-19 vaccine and pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during the recertification survey from 8/26/24 through 8/30/24 the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was consistently pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interview and review of facility records during the recertification survey from 8/26/24 through 8/30/24, the facility did not ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) performance reviews wer...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (NY00296050), the facility did not ensure that the resident r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2021
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** An observation was made on 8/9/21 at 11:07 AM on the Lower Level of the medication nurse on the lower numbered hallway passing m...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that a ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, documentation review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure that the physical environment was maintained in accordance with 483.90. Specifically, several gnats were not...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2019
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review conducted during the most recent recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that the plan of care was implemented consistently to address pre-dialysis ass...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below New York's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 18 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $66,859 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in New York. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within New York, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing Staffed?
CMS rates ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 25%, compared to the New York average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing?
State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING during 2019 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 17 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing?
ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 120 certified beds and approximately 107 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in YONKERS, New York.
How Does Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing Compare to Other New York Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in New York, ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (25%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in New York. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing Stick Around?
Staff at ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 25%, the facility is 21 percentage points below the New York average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing Ever Fined?
ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING has been fined $66,859 across 1 penalty action. This is above the New York average of $33,747. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Adira At Riverside Rehabilitation And Nursing on Any Federal Watch List?
ADIRA AT RIVERSIDE REHABILITATION AND NURSING is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.