CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews with hospital system's transportation staff (Driver #1), Passenger Services ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interviews with hospital system's transportation staff (Driver #1), Passenger Services Manager and Nurse Practitioner (NP), the facility failed to leave Resident #45 in place for a clinical assessment of injury after a fall that occurred during transport. Resident #45 was being transported to dialysis in a hospital system owned transport van. Driver #1 made a sudden stop which caused Resident #45 to slide forward out his wheelchair onto the van floor when his seatbelt loosened. Driver #1 pulled the van into the median of the road and attempted to transfer Resident #45 back into his wheelchair. When Driver #1 was unsuccessful in transferring Resident #45 back to his wheelchair, she continued to transport Resident #45 to the dialysis center while the resident was seated on the floor of the transportation van. Driver #1 was not qualified to provide a comprehensive physical assessment to determine if the resident sustained any injuries. Resident #45 did not sustain any injury, however there was a high likelihood of serious injury after sliding out of his wheelchair onto the floor of the vehicle when the driver had to suddenly apply brakes to avoid hitting pedestrians. This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care (Resident #45).
The immediate jeopardy began on 2/9/24 when Resident #45 was not physically assessed for injury before being moved and was transported to dialysis while seated and unsecured on the floor of the transportation van. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 10/15/24 when the facility implemented a credible allegation of immediate jeopardy removal. The facility will remain out of compliance at a lower scope and severity of D (no actual harm that is immediate jeopardy) to ensure education and monitoring systems put into place are effective.
The findings included:
The Motor Vehicle Accident and Emergency Reporting procedure updated 6/23/23 included a policy that stated health care passenger service drivers would report a motor vehicle accident or medical/vehicle emergencies immediately. The supervisor should be called (number listed) to resolve any urgent or emergency situations concerning the driver, the delivery or pick-up of passengers, and vehicle related problems at any time. The procedures included if patient starts to slide or shift while in wheelchair during transport - driver must pull over when safe to do so and seek help. i.e. Call 911 - fire department, pull vehicle onto the shoulder of the road; assess patient and/ passenger to determine if emergency medical assistance was needed and if patient or passenger was injured, report this to your supervisor immediate so an online incident report can be done via CARE Event (A Care Event is an incident/accident report that involves resident safety).
Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized weakness, end stage renal disease and hypertension.
Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 was cognitively intact. The MDS further indicated he required substantial/maximum assistance (helper does more than half of the effort) to go from a lying position to sitting, utilized a manual wheelchair and received dialysis.
An interview was conducted with Resident #45 on 10/11/24 at 5:00 PM. Resident #45 stated he recalled an incident in which he slid from his wheelchair in the transportation van while going to his dialysis appointment. He further stated the brakes [when the driver applied brakes, it] threw him out of the chair. Resident #45 revealed he had gotten help from emergency medical service (EMS) staff to get back into his wheelchair. He stated Driver #1 slammed on brakes and he did not touch his seatbelt.
Driver #1's witness statement dated 2/9/24 at 2:45 PM read Driver #1 was driving down [Highway] 52 South towards the dialysis center. Some pedestrians started to run out in the front of her and Driver #1 had to put on brakes suddenly. Somehow the seatbelt came loose, and Resident #45 slid out of wheelchair onto the floor. Driver #1 pulled into the median to check on Resident #45 and attempted to get him up. Resident #45 stated he wanted to stay there and just take him on to his appointment. Once at dialysis, Driver #1 asked for help from dialysis staff. The Dialysis Staff said they could only help if Resident #45 was visible in the building. Driver #1 called 911 to help. Resident #45 stated he was not hurt to the medic on the phone, and they came and got him back in the chair. Driver #1 took Resident #45 in dialysis center for his appointment.
Interview with Driver #1 on 10/10/24 at 4:09 PM revealed she could not recall the date of the incident but recalled a van incident that occurred with Resident #45. She stated she was transporting Resident #45 to dialysis when she observed 2 pedestrians that appeared to be darting in the roadway. She slammed on brakes. When she slammed on the brakes, Resident #45 slid from his wheelchair, his seatbelt came loose and he landed on the van floor. She indicated it was the force of the van stopping that made the resident's seatbelt come loose and Resident #45 landed on the van floor. She stated she stopped the van and tried to put Resident #45 back in his chair. She could not get him in the chair, and he stated he did not want help. Driver #1 stated she was close to the dialysis center, so she drove Resident #45 while he was seated on the floor of the transportation van. She indicated she should have contacted 911 to get Resident #45 back into his wheelchair and not drive with him on the floor of the van. Following the incident, she received education to call 911 if a fall happened on transport and she shouldn't move a resident. She further stated she had seen the video of the incident as there was a camera on the transportation vans.
An observation of video footage (visual and audio) of the van incident dated 2/9/24 was conducted with the Administrator on 10/11/24 at 2:31 PM. The video footage revealed a date of 2/9/24 and began at 11:43 AM. The camera was mounted in the front of the van and provided a view toward the rear of the van. Resident #45 originally seated behind the driver in the middle isle of the van. At 11:49 AM in transport, Resident #45 was observed to lean forward as his seatbelt was observed to come from his right side (where it was fastened) to his left. Resident #45 was observed to lean to his right side then slide forward out of his wheelchair in the aisle and then fall to his right. After falling to his right, Resident #45 was no longer visible through the video (behind passenger seat). His wheelchair could still be seen in the upright position. Driver #1 was observed to stop the transportation van in the road's median and stated someone ran out in front of her. Driver #1 then exited the driver's seat and entered the side door of the transportation van. She was overheard to tell Resident #45 You going to have to help me out now. Resident #45 was heard telling Driver #1 she was going to have to get some help. Driver #1 was observed to attempt to get the resident back up into his wheelchair as evidenced by picking him up under both arms. Resident #45 was observed sliding back out of his wheelchair back onto his bottom to the floor of the transportation van. Driver #1 then positioned Resident #45's back against his wheelchair while he was seated on the floor while telling him to hold on. Driver #1 was further observed to get back in the driver's seat. She stated she would drive slow. She also stated Resident #45 shouldn't have taken his seatbelt off. Driver #1 transported Resident #45 to the dialysis center. At 11:53 AM Driver #1 was observed pulling into the dialysis center parking covered parking deck. Resident #45 could be heard breathing heavy and moaning. Driver #1 was observed to go into the dialysis center, and then shortly after came back out to the transportation van. Within distance of the surveillance video, Driver #1 was observed to make a phone call at 11:55 AM (not within distance to overhear conversation). Driver #1 was observed to meet emergency medical services (EMS) upon arrival at 12:08 PM. Two EMS personnel were observed to assist Resident #45 back into his wheelchair at 12:10 PM. EMS were observed not to take vital signs or check Resident #45 for injuries. After EMS transferred Resident #45 into his wheelchair they exited the transportation van. Driver #1 was observed taking Resident #45 into the dialysis center at 12:12 PM.
According to contact with the local EMS agency on 10/22/24, a report was not made. EMS attendants observed in the video footage did not document the event.
Interview with Passenger Services Manager on 10/11/24 at 2:00 PM revealed when an incident occurred during transport, the driver should contact dispatch office. After watching the video footage she indicated following the incident, Driver #1 should have contacted 911 to assist her transferring Resident #45 back into his wheelchair. Driver #1 should not have attempted to transfer Resident #45. She indicated that due to the investigation, Driver #1 was reeducated regarding the seatbelt strap, transporting a secured resident and contacting 911 for assistance. She further indicated it was not part of the procedure to drive with a resident on the floor of the van unsecured.
On 10/14/24 at 9:03 AM the Unit Manager stated she had not completed an incident report for the fall but did put the incident in a care event. She continued that generally, when a resident had a fall, the facility would assess the resident before moving them. Assessing the resident prior to getting him up was to ensure there were no fractures or anything that could cause more damage if moved.
Interview with the Nurse Practitioner on 10/14/24 at 11:00 AM initially indicated she did not believe the resident had the dexterity to unhook his seatbelt. She stated there should be an assessment of the resident before he was assisted up from the floor of the transportation van. The assessment would have included his level of consciousness, a quick neurological check to see if moving all extremities, baseline mentation, looking for trauma, blood, bruising or any signs of injury. A body assessment should have been completed to identify any abrasions that could have occurred due to the incident. Resident #45 was not someone who could be lifted because Resident #45 cannot assist.
An interview with Director of Nursing Services, on 10/14/24 at 3:26 PM was conducted. She stated she had seen the video of the incident involving Resident #45 while he was being transported to his appointment. She further revealed Driver #1 would not have been able to assess the resident due to not being licensed. She indicated Driver #1 also continued to transport Resident #45 following the fall while he was seated on the floor of the transportation van. Driver #1 should have contacted 911 for assistance.
Interview with the Administrator on 10/14/24 at 2:12 PM stated she was not clinical and was not involved with Resident #45's assessment following the incident Driver #1 should have not attempted to pick up Resident #45 from the floor of the van and should not have continued to transport Resident #45 while seated on the floor of the transport van. Resident #45 should be assessed before he was moved, and she assumed EMS would have assessed him.
The facility was notified of immediate jeopardy on 10/11/24 at 7:17 PM.
The facility provided the following immediate jeopardy removal plan.
Identify those recipients wo have suffered, or are likely to suffer, a serious adverse outcome as a result of the noncompliance:
On 2/09/24 Resident #45 was at the dialysis clinic when the Administrator was notified by a staff member that Resident #45 experienced a fall while in van transport. Driver #1 did not notify the facility administrator nor her supervisor, the Passenger Services Manager, about the accident.
On 2/09/24 the Administrator contacted the Passenger Services Manager to begin an investigation and require education of Driver #1.
On 2/09/24 Driver #1 put on the brakes suddenly and Resident #45 slid from his wheelchair onto the floor. Driver #1 stated that she did attempt to get Resident #45 up however Resident #45 stated to just to leave him on the van floor and take him to the Dialysis Clinic. Driver #1 then proceeded to call 911 for assistance. Driver #1 asked Resident #45 if he was ok and Resident stated that he was. Resident #45 stated to 911 personnel that he was not hurt, and they moved him back to the wheelchair. After Resident #45 was transferred to his chair by EMS (Emergency Medical Services) staff, Resident #45 stated that he had to go to the restroom Resident #45 required assistance prior to being dialyzed, Driver #1 transported Resident #45 back to the facility to receive care and Driver #1 then transported Resident #45 back to the Dialysis Clinic to be dialyzed without further incident. Driver #1 returned Resident #45 to the facility after dialysis was completed.
There was no documentation that the nurse assigned to Resident #45 completed an assessment after incident on 2/9/24.
Resident #45 was assessed by physician on 2/10/24 not related to this incident and no injuries were noted.
The Passenger Services Manager provided documentation to validate that Driver #1 received education on the following policies and procedures on 2/13/24 and on 3/2/24: Expectations of Passenger Services Drivers', Mobile Cellular Device, Proper Transport Loading and Unloading Wheelchair Patients, General Safety, Motor Vehicle Accidents& Emergency Reporting Procedures to the facility administrator.
On 10/14/24, the Passenger Services Manager notified the facility administrator that on 2/12/24 and 2/13/24, the Lead Driver accompanied Driver #1 on transportation routes and provided one-to one re-training as assigned by the Passenger Services Manager. Driver #1 reported back to work on 2/12/24.
The Passenger Services Manager provided documentation to validate that Driver #1 received related education on the following policies and procedures: General Safety, Motor Vehicle Accidents & Emergency Reporting Procedures, Expectations of Passenger Services Drivers, Proper Transport Loading and Unloading Wheelchair Patients and Mobile Cellular Device to the facility administrator. Documentation of training and acknowledgment was signed on 2/13/24.
On 3/2/24 Driver #1 was re-educated again on the following Policies and procedures: General Safety, Motor Vehicle Accidents & Emergency Reporting Procedures, Expectations of Passenger Services Drivers, Proper Transport Loading and Unloading Wheelchair Patients and Mobile Cellular Device and documentation of training was provided to the facility administrator. Documentation of training and acknowledgment was signed on 3/2/24.
All residents who use wheelchair transportation services for medical appointment[s] are at risk of experiencing an adverse outcome as a result of this deficient practice. Current residents who had been transported by the transportation service within the last 30 days were interviewed on 10/12/24 and 10/13/24 by members from the IDT team, specifically the Resident Liaison, Rehab Manager, Activity Director and LPN/Unit Coordinator regarding any incidents or accidents where the resident was not immediately assessed for injuries occurred in transport. For current residents who were not able to be interviewed, the assigned transportation companions were interviewed 10/12/24 and 10/13/24 and no evidence of any additional deficient practice during transport was reported where drivers moved residents after an incident without being first assessed by 911 personnel or licensed nurse/physician.
The Passenger Services Manager was interviewed by the facility Administrator on 10/11/24 and 10/13/24 related to any events of deficient practice reported from all drivers within the last 30 days which required immediate assessment for injuries. The Passenger Services Manager reviewed incident reports and communicated directly with all drivers providing services to the facility and found no evidence of any deficient practice during transport review period reported. The Passenger Services Manager also asked all drivers, including Driver # 1, if there were any accidents/incidents that occurred on transport that were not reported in the last 30 days and the drivers' responses indicated that there had not been any accidents/incidents that had not been reported during review period.
On 10/13/24, the Passenger Services Manager confirmed with the facility administrator that interviews; and a review of transportation records for that past 30 days found no evidence of deficient practice with drivers providing service to residents at the facility.
Specify the action the entity will take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or recurring, and when the action will be complete:
The facility will take immediate action by informing Hospital system transportation services to remove Driver #1 from transporting facility residents to any off-campus appointments, Effective at 8:40 pm on 10/11/24.
On 10/12/24, the Passenger Services Manager and the Facility Administrator reviewed the policy, Motor Vehicle Accident & Emergency Reporting Procedure and found the policy did not address skilled nursing facility residents and the policy section regarding emergencies was revised on 10/14/24 to reflect that for skilled nursing home residents, drivers are not to move patient until assessed by EMS or licensed nurse/physician, as listed below:
Medical/Vehicle Emergencies:
•
If patient starts to slide or shift while in wheelchair during transport - Driver must pull over when safe to do so and seek help. i.e. Call 911 - fire dept. Each driver has a cell phone provided and other communication devices which are owned and managed through Mobile Medical Services not the facility.
•
Pull vehicle onto the shoulder of the road
•
Evacuate Patients and or passengers from the vehicle quickly and safely if vehicle is on fire
•
Administer first aid and use fire extinguishers as appropriate
•
Do not move patient. Patient must be accessed by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) or licensed nurse/physician
•
Drivers will immediately notify the Passenger Services Manager in the event of an incident/accident during transport
•
Call Atrium Health Security or contact 9-1-1 as needed for emergency help and update Mobile Medicine Passenger Services Dispatch at (704)512-7920
•
If patient or passenger is injured, report this to your supervisor immediately so an online incident report can be done via CARE Event (A Care Event is an incident/accident report that involves resident safety)
•
Driver must remain with patients and/or passengers until all are transported to an emergency care facility if necessary
•
Have Atrium Health Security notify supervisor and department head as needed
On 10/14/24 the facility administrator notified the Passenger Services Manager to immediately notify the facility administrator or charge nurse in the event of an incident/accident during transport.
All current van drivers will receive education by 10/14/24. Any current van drivers who do not receive education by 10/14/24 (due to FMLA, leave, etc.) will be required to complete education prior to working a scheduled shift. All van drivers hired after 10/14/24 will be required to complete this training and education upon hire. The education will be required during annual orientation.
Beginning 10/12/24, the Passenger Services Manager will immediately notify and provide all transportation services incident reports involving nursing home facility residents to the Administrator and Director of Nursing to ensure that timely resident assessments post medical/vehicle emergencies are completed.
The alleged date of immediate jeopardy removal was October 15, 2024.
On 10/16/2024 the facility's immediate jeopardy removal was validated by the following:
The facility provided documentation to support immediate jeopardy removal including education provided by the Passenger Services Manager to the current drivers. Drivers were interviewed and they reported the procedure to follow if a resident falls on the van, including pulling the van over as soon as possible, calling 911 to request an assessment of the resident by an EMT, contacting the dispatcher to report the accident or incident. Drivers verbalized they were not to move the resident until an EMT, nurse, or physician had assessed the resident for injuries.
The immediate jeopardy was removed on 10/15/2024.
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was cognitively intact. He was not receiving an anticoagulant. He did not have any impairment to his upper and lower extremities.
Review of Passenger Services Liftgate Use and Patient Safety Check (no date) supplied by the Passenger Services Manager revealed the following:
I. Vehicle Liftgate Use & Safety Checks-
- Always ride liftgate up when getting ready to offload patient
- Ensure liftgate is in the upward position prior to attempting to unload patient
- Do not ride liftgate up or down with the patient on lift
II.Passenger Safety (Unload) -
- Always ride the liftgate up when getting ready to offload patient
- Ensure liftgate is in the upward (level with the floor in the rear of the van) position prior to attempting to unload patient and that the liftgate is level with floor of vehicle
- Get in front of patient and push wheelchair onto liftgate and secure wheelchair by locking wheelchair brakes
Review of Passenger Services Safety Briefing (no date) supplied by the Passenger Services Manager revealed the following:
- To ensure the lift gate is in the upward position prior to attempting to offload a patient, always ride the lift gate up after entering from the rear of the vehicle.
Review of the video and audio recording (which was center- rear facing) from the hospital owned transportation van dated 8/12/24 revealed the following:
- At 6:08 PM the hospital owned transportation van, driven by Driver #1, returned to the facility with Resident #62's responsible party, Resident #62, and another resident. Resident #62 was observed in his wheelchair with his shoulder securement strap resting across his left upper arm.
- At 6:09 PM to 6:10 PM, Driver #1 disconnected Resident #62's shoulder securement strap and Resident #62 remained in his wheelchair while another resident was being unloaded by Driver #1 via the lift gate.
- At 6:12 PM Driver#1 returned to the hospital owned transportation van and entered from the rear. The lift gate was observed to be on ground level. Driver #1 unsecured Resident #62's wheelchair securement straps from behind.
- At 6:13 PM Driver #1, who was behind Resident #62, was observed pulling Resident #62 backwards towards the rear of the hospital owned transportation van. As Driver #1 crossed the threshold at the rear of the hospital owned transportation van, an audible alarm sounded, and indicator lights lit up red and flashed, which indicated the liftgate was not in the upward position and there was a risk of falling out of the rear of the van. Driver #1 proceeded to fall out of the back of the hospital owned transportation van. She let go of Resident #62's wheelchair as she was falling backwards out of the hospital owned transportation van. Resident #62 was seated in his wheelchair and remained in motion rolling backwards out of the hospital owned transportation van. Driver #1's arm was observed to come up to meet the back of Resident #62's wheelchair as Resident #62 and his wheelchair proceeded to roll off the back of the hospital owned transportation van. Resident #62 continued rolling backwards in his wheelchair and his legs were seen coming up in the air as his chair exited the rear of the hospital owned transportation van and pivoted to where the resident was still seated but facing upwards. Resident #62 then was observed to be slightly unseated from his wheelchair. The wheelchair wheels were observed to be hanging off the back of the hospital owned transportation van. Driver #1 ceased to be in the field of vision. Driver #1 and Resident #62 could be heard yelling/calling out for help. Resident #62's wheelchair wheels were suspended in air and still spinning.
- At 6:14 PM to 6:16 PM facility staff were observed exiting the facility and saw Driver #1 lying on her back on the lift gate on the ground and Resident #62 in his wheelchair tilted to the left resting on Driver #1 and ran back inside to get help. More staff responded and came out to assist. The Unit Manager also responded. Staff were observed standing over Driver #1 and Resident #62. The Unit Manager was observed entering the hospital owned transportation van from the side entrance and walking to the rear of the hospital owned transportation van towards the lift gate. The Unit Manager was observed bending over and grabbing the wheelchair legs while other staff were observed assisting Driver #1 from underneath Resident #62 and his wheelchair. Resident #62's wheelchair was then placed to the left side of the hospital owned transportation van. Driver #1 was observed to stand and stretch. Staff continued to stand as Resident #62 was being assessed. Resident #62 was assisted by staff back to his wheelchair and taken back inside the facility by staff.
An observation was completed on 10/11/24 at 4:55 PM of the Administrator obtaining the measurement of the back of the transportation van where Resident #62 fell backwards in his wheelchair to where he and his wheelchair landed measured three (3) feet and ten (10) inches.
Review of the Care Event (incident report) notification completed by the Passenger Services Manager dated 8/12/24 revealed the following information: Event Description- Driver was unloading patient from wheelchair van. Patient fell out of the wheelchair as driver was exiting patient from vehicle. Driver statement will be sent. Date Occurred: 8/12/24. Incident Location (facility): Hospital System- Health Mobile Medicine. Extent of Harm: Mild Harm. Event Type: Fall.
Review of Driver #1 witness statement dated 8/12/24 read in part: Driver #1 was unloading two patients. Driver #1 unloaded the first patient and took them inside the building. Driver #1 returned to the hospital owned transportation van on the passenger side, where the door was already opened, and unlocked the seatbelt and the wheelchair securement straps. Driver #1 was behind the wheelchair to pull it back to the rear of the hospital owned transportation van not realizing the lift gate was down on the ground and not in the level position. The safety beeper went off. At that point, Driver #1 was too far back and fell backwards, still holding on to the wheelchair. Driver #1 let go of the wheelchair, so it stayed on the hospital owned transportation van but was tilted back. Driver #1 balanced and held the wheelchair up with her feet as long as she could and called out for help. When Driver #1 strength gave out, the patient and wheelchair fell back onto Driver #1 body breaking the fall. Driver #1 braced his [the resident] upper body with her left arm and hand until help arrived.
An interview with Driver #1 on 10/10/24 at 4:33 PM revealed that she and Resident #62 fell out of the back of the hospital owned transportation van on 8/12/24. Driver #1 explained she went to unload Resident #62 from the hospital owned transportation van after unloading another resident. Driver #1 stated she entered the hospital owned transportation van from the rear and proceeded to unsecure Resident #62 from the wheelchair securement straps from behind. Driver #1 explained she remained behind the wheelchair of Resident #62 and wheeled him backwards towards the lift gate area. Driver #1 voiced she did not realize the lift gate was down. Driver #1 continued to explain while moving Resident #62 towards the lift gate area, walking backwards as she was pulling Resident #62 in his wheelchair backwards, Driver #1 verbalized the alarm/sensor sounded as she crossed the threshold at rear of the van. Driver #1 stated the alarm sound startled her. Driver #1 proceeded to explain she fell backwards out of the hospital owned transportation van taking the wheelchair with Resident #62 with her as she fell. Driver #1 further stated she held the wheelchair with Resident #62 in the air with her feet and hands as long as she could (no timeframe given) and hollered for help. Driver #1 expressed she started to fatigue and the wheelchair with the resident fell on top of her as she laid on the lift gate which was at ground level. Driver #1 voiced Resident #62 did not hit the ground, because she had absorbed his fall.
A telephone attempt was made on 10/11/24 at 11:05 AM to speak with the responsible party for Resident #62 without success.
Review of the post fall evaluation completed by the Unit Manager dated 8/12/24 revealed the following: Fall Occurrence: August 12, 2024. Day of Week of Fall Occurrence: Monday. Location of Fall Occurrence: Exterior. Description of Fall Activity: Other. Assistive Device: Lift and Walker. Post Fall Injury: No apparent injury. Post Fall Notification (date/ time/ name): August 12, 2024/ 7:25 PM/ Nurse Practitioner. Outcome of Notification: No new order received. Date/ Time of Family Notification/ Family Contact: August 12, 2024/ 7:25 PM/ onsite discussion with responsible party. Post Fall Analysis (current interventions in place): wheelchair for locomotion, wheelchair locked when not in use, non-skid footwear.
Review of the Unit Manager nursing progress note dated 8/12/24 read in part: Resident #62 observed laying on back on top of Driver #1 on the lift of the hospital owned transportation van with wheelchair laying on top of Resident #62. The lift gate was resting flat on the ground. Driver #1 stated she broke his fall. Staff came in from the back of the hospital owned transportation van and pulled the wheelchair off of the resident and were able to position resident to where the driver could slide out from under him. Staff assessed Resident #62 for injury with no apparent injuries noted. Staff assisted Resident #62 to his wheelchair and assessed head for injury, none noted. Nurse Practitioner (NP) was made aware and going to complete full assessment of resident for injury. Responsible party made aware and appreciative of care.
An interview with the Unit Manager was completed on 10/11/24 at 11:34 AM. The Unit Manager stated she was in her office working and a family member or visitor was leaving out of the facility. The Unit Manager proceeded to state the family member or visitor started hollering her name. The Unit Manager responded and ran towards the front entry hallway per the request. The Unit Manager explained when she arrived at the front entrance door, the lift was down on the back entry of the hospital owned transportation van and Driver #1 was lying flat on her back with her feet against the back of the hospital owned transportation van (bumper area), Resident #62 was on top of Driver #1 on his back, the wheelchair was half on top of him/ half under him somehow. The Unit Manager recalled she immediately went to remove the wheelchair from on top of resident. She stated she could not remove the wheelchair from on top of Resident #62, so she went in the hospital owned transportation van through the side entrance to remove the wheelchair from the top angle. The Unit Manager voiced she was able to remove the wheelchair and get it upright inside the hospital owned transportation van. The Unit Manager stated she exited the hospital owned transportation van with the wheelchair through the side entrance. The Unit Manager further stated that she and another nurse quickly assessed Resident #62 for immediate injury so they could get Driver #1 from underneath him and get Resident #62 lying flat. The Unit Manager and another nurse assisted Driver #1 from underneath Resident #62. The Unit Manager assessed Resident #62 which included movement of all extremities, skin assessment (abrasions, bruising or red marks), and assessing for pain. The Unit Manager recalled Resident #62, and Driver #1 were able to verbalize that Resident #62 did not hit his head during the incident. The Unit Manager and other staff were able to provide support to Resident #62 and assist him with standing so he could transfer to his wheelchair. The Unit Manager had a staff person assist Resident #62 back into the facility. The Unit Manager voiced the NP was onsite and assessed Resident #62 after the incident. The Unit Manager did not recall Resident #62 sustaining any injuries. Resident #62's responsible party was onsite during the incident, but the Unit Manager could not recall if Resident #62's responsible party witnessed the incident.
A telephone interview was completed with the Passenger Services Manager on 10/11/24 at 1:56 PM. The Passenger Services Manager recalled the incident involving Resident #62. The Passenger Services Manager stated she was contacted by Driver #1 at some point after the incident. The Passenger Services Manger did not recall the exact time she was notified of the incident. Driver #1 expressed that she forgot to place the lift gate in the upward position while unloading a resident. The Passenger Services Manager stated the video footage in the hospital owned transportation vans had both audio and visual components. The Passenger Services Manager communicated when she reviewed the video footage, the lift gate was not in the upward position and Driver #1 and Resident #62 fell out the back of the hospital owned transportation van onto the lift gate. The Passenger Services Manager recalled seeing the red light flash but did not recall hearing the alarm sound when she reviewed the video footage. The Passenger Services Manager stated Driver #1 was provided re-education on what steps should have been followed when unloading a patient, inclusive of lift gate use, via telephone call on 8/12/24 due to the Passenger Service Manager being out of the office. An in-person coaching, counseling and re-education session on the process for unloading a patient, inclusive of lift gate use, was completed by the Passenger Service Manager on 8/15/24.
A telephone attempt was made on 10/11/24 at 11:15 AM to speak with the previous Director of Nursing without success.
An interview completed on 10/14/24 at 11:59 AM with Nurse #3 revealed a family member returned inside the building and hollered that help was needed outside. Nurse #3, who was sitting at the nurses' station, and other staff responded. Driver #1 was lying on the lift which was all the way to the ground, Resident #62 was on top driver, and Resident #62's wheelchair was tilted backwards and hung up in the mechanical parts of the lift. Nurse #3 communicated Resident #62 was truly resting on top of driver. Nurse #3 assisted with Resident #62 returning him inside of facility and to his room. The nurse recalled the Unit Manager completed a post fall assessment and informed the NP. Nurse #3 recalled Resident #62 did not have any visible marks or abrasions. Resident #62 did not verbalize any complaint or pain. Nurse #3 stated that Resident #62 was in a pleasant mood after the incident and requested staff to change his clothes due to wearing paper scrubs from his appointment.
Review of the Nurse Practitioner assessment dated [DATE] read in part: Patient seen today due to recent fall. Patient had an incident of a fall when he was being transported. Patient moving all extremities at baseline. No visible signs of injury. Denies any complaints. Notes that he is hungry and ready for dinner. Assessment and Plan: Ambulatory dysfunction- physical therapy and occupational therapy. Fall precautions- last fall noted on 8/12 when wheelchair tipped backwards on transport van, but patient sustained no injuries.
An interview with the Nurse Practitioner (NP) was completed on 10/14/24 at 10:50 AM. The NP stated she was aware of the incident involving Resident #62's fall out of the hospital owned transportation van. The NP explained she was onsite on 8/12/24 but was not certain if the incident occurred prior to her arrival or when she came out of her office. The NP recalled Resident #62 was back in his room sitting in his wheelchair when she visited him. The NP verbalized she spoke with Resident #62 to determine if he was at his baseline and had any complaint of pain or injury. The NP stated Resident #62 was alert, she was able to determine there was no notable change in orientation (at baseline resident had some confusion), and Resident #62 was able to describe the incident. Resident #62 was able to move all extremities while sitting in his wheelchair. The NP stated she did not have the resident stand. However, he was able to lift legs and push legs against her without any problems. Same with his arms. He had no abrasions on his upper or lower extremities, and no open areas/ abrasions noted to his head area. The NP recalled Resident #62 had no complaints of pain or discomfort.
An interview with the Director of Nursing Services was completed on 10/14/24 at 3:05 PM. The Director of Nursing Services stated she was notified of the event a few days later (uncertain of actual date). She explained she was made aware of transport moving someone out the back of the hospital owned transportation van and both resident and driver fell out the back of the hospital owned transportation van due to the lift gate not being in the appropriate placement. The Director of Nursing Services received email notifications after the event of in-servicing/ re-education and training being provided to Driver #1. The Passenger Services Manager completed the plan of correction following the fall from the hospital owned transportation van involving Driver #1 and Resident #62. The Director of Nursing Services was uncertain of the collaboration with facility administrative staff regarding the incident. The Director of Nursing Services explained the process after an incident should include assessment of the resident by a licensed professional, a root cause analysis, and have a plan of correction in place to prevent any further incidents, collaboration between transportation staff and facility administrative staff (if the incident involved a hospital owned transportation van). The Director of Nursing Services was not aware if the facility investigated the root cause and implemented interventions to prevent the incident from happening again.
An interview was completed with the unlicensed Administrator on 10/14/24 at 3:51 PM. The unlicensed Administrator communicated Driver #1 did not adhere to the safety mechanism on the lift gate. The alarm sounded and the light flashed. The Administrator continued to communicate Driver #1 did not place the lift gate in the right position when unloading Resident #62 and this caused the incident to occur.
The unlicensed Administrator was notified of immediate jeopardy on 10/11/24 at 7:17 PM.
The facility provided the following credible allegation of immediate jeopardy removal plan:
Address how corrective action will be accomplished for those residents found to have been affected by the deficient practice:
1. On 2/09/24 Resident #45 was at the dialysis clinic when the Administrator was notified by a staff member that Resident #45 experienced a fall while in van transport. Driver #1 did not notify the facility administrator nor her supervisor, the Passenger Services Manager, about the accident.
On 2/09/24 the Administrator contacted the Passenger Services Manager to begin an investigation and require education of Driver #1.
On 2/09/24 Driver #1 was transporting Resident #45 to a dialysis appointment in the Hospital system transportation van. Driver #1 put on the brakes suddenly and Resident #45 slid from his wheelchair onto the floor. The Passenger Services Manager conducted the investigation and completed the review of the video revealed that the lap belt and shoulder harness had excessive slack and did not appear to be snug to the resident as per manufacturer's instructions. Driver #1 went to Resident #45 and attempted to pick up Resident #45 and placed him back in his wheelchair but was unsuccessful and he slid back to the floor where he was in a seated position. Driver #1 returned to the driver's seat, and then drove the van to the Dialysis Clinic, with Resident #45 on the floor of the van. The Dialysis Clinic is approximately 1.2 miles from the facility.
On 2/10/24, Fleet Services inspected the van post incident and found no malfunctions of the securement system.
On 10/13/24, the facility administrator interviewed the Passenger Services Manager, and she stated that all drivers complete a daily pre-trip audit checklist which includes checking securement straps (lap belt and shoulder harness) for signs of fraying, malfunctioning buckles and wheelchair tie downs before the drivers' first trip of the day. Driver #1 did not report any pre-trip malfunctioning of the van securement system to the Passenger Services Manager on 2/9/24.
The Passenger Services Manager provided documentation to validate that Driver #1 received related education on the following policies and procedures: General Safety, Motor Vehicle Accidents & Emergency Reporting Procedures, Expectations of Passenger Services Drivers, Proper Transport Loading and Unloading Wheelchair Patients and Mobile Cellular Device to the facility administrator. Documentation of training and acknowledgment was signed on 2/13/24.
On 3/2/24 Driver #1 was re-educated again on the following Policies and procedures: General Safety, Motor Vehicle Accidents & Emergency Reporting Procedures, Expectations of Passenger Services Drivers, Proper Transport Loading and Unloading Wheelchair Patients and Mobile Cellular Device and documentation of training was provided to the facility administrator. Documentation of training and acknowledgment was signed on 3/2/24.
On 10/14/24, the Passenger Services Manager notified the facility administrator that on 2/12/24 and 2/13/24, the Lead Driver accompanied Driver #1 on transportation routes and provided one-to one re-training with return demonstration as assigned by the Passenger Services Manager which included manufacturer's instructions for securing the lap belt, shoulder harness and cease driving when resident is not securely seated or when resident has fallen out of wheelchair. Driver #1 reported back to work on 2/12/24. Documentation of training and acknowledgment was signed on 2/13/24 by Driver #1.
2. On 8/12/24 Driver #1 returned to the facility from medical appointments with two residents. Driver #1 offloaded one resident and returned the resident back into the facility. Resident #62 was still on the van waiting to be offloaded by Driver #1. Driver #1 unlocked the seat belt and unbuckled the hooks from the wheelchair. When Driver #1 began to pull resident off the van onto the liftgate the safety alarm alerted, indicating an unsafe lift position. Driver #1 stated that she was not in position to stop while in motion and Driver #1 fell off the van onto the grounded lift gate. Driver #1 did not realize that she did not have the liftgate in the correct position which caused the incident to occur. Resident #62, while remaining in wheelchair, fell onto Driver #1. Resident #62 was immediately assessed by a licensed nurse and no apparent injuries were noted. On 8/13/24, the Physician assessed resident for injury related to the incident and no injuries were noted.
Passenger Services Manager provided the following employee action and education for Driver #1 on 8/12/24. Driver #1 continued to transport SNF residents without interruption after 8/12/24 incident.
Education and actions were validated by the facility administrator on 9/11/24:
8/12/24: Driver #1 reeducated by Passenger Services Manager on the wheelchair van lift gate which included offloading resident from van Driver #1 acknowledged education of Lift gate Use and Patient Safety. Per manufacturer's instructions
8/13/24: Vehicle taken out of service to have liftgate evaluated. Fleet Service found the liftgate was functioning with no concerns and van was put back in use.
8/16/24: Spot Check/Observation/Retraining conducted by Lead Driver II (the senior driver and provides education and training for drivers). Pre-trip inspections are to be conducted daily by Driver assigned prior to driving patients in van. Lead Driver II will randomly audit all drivers pre-trip inspections.
8/19/24: Competency skills checklist document completed for Driver #1 by Lead Driver II.
Competency skills checklist includes but not limited to the following for all Mobile Medical Services Drivers:
Use of Two Way Radio
Knows how to perform pre trip inspection checklist and able to note any vehicle issues
Knows how to report vehicle accident within app
Liftgate Use
Checked Liftgate lights
Check lift up and down button
Run safety check on liftgate before using for passengers
Demonstrated Use of Manual pump for liftgate
Vehicle/Liftgate Operations
Demonstrates and discuss concepts of safety always
Evaluates loading and unloading zones for hazards
Opens and properly secures van doors
Assures level landing area and clear path of operation for lift
Assures liftgate is in the up position prior to offloading wheelchair patient
Driver completes a visual inspection of resident/patient wheelchair (excessive items in chair, leg lifts, functioning brakes, rolls freely)
Driver identifies weight limit of the lift
Put wheelchair patient on the lift in the forward position or per the lift manufacturers recommendation
Secured wheelchair on lift.
Pushed wheelchair onto van and locked wheelchair brakes
Correctly operated lift
Driver returns lift control to appropriate location
Wheelchair Securement and Patient Restraint
Communicated with patient what you are doing (reaching across them to place shoulder harness and lap belt on)
Secured back straps
Confirms floor anchor position for straps is within the width of the wheelchair frame
Pulls straps straight out to chair and attaches to appropriate anchor point on the wheelchair frame
Does not allow strap to twist
Allows straps to retract and manually tightens them by twisting the ratchet knob
Placed lap strap around the patient and locked it in place
Secured front straps
Identifies lap or lap/shoulder belt system
Assures restraint belt is against patient and does not have slack
Assures shoulder strap does not twist
Positions lab belt low on torso at area of pelvic arch (hips)
Positions buckle on the right side
Positions shoulder belt over shoulder and not against neck
Positions shoulder strap at level with or higher than shoulder
Ensures that straps not compromised with blankets that are over patients
Watchful of any items that could prevent a safe patient securement
Incident & Medical Reporting
Correctly stated how an Incident is Reported Involving a Patient
Understands process of notification and documentation of any incident
All residents who use wheelchair transportation services for medical appointments are at risk of experiencing an adverse outcome as a result of this deficient practice. Residents who experienced transport by the transportation service within 30 days were interviewed on 10/12/24 and 10/13/24 by the following members from the Interdisciplinary team (IDT) for review and discussion: Activities Director, Rehab Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Coordinator and Resident Liaison. Interviews were related to any incidents or accidents while in transport occurred. No evidence of any additional deficient practice during transport was reported. For current residents who were not able to be interviewed, the assigned transportation companions were interviewed 10/12/24 and 10/13/24 and no evidence of any additional deficient practice during transport was reported.
Specify the action the entity will take to alter the process or system failure to prevent a serious adverse outcome from occurring or recurring, and when the action will be complete:
The facility will take immediate action by informing hospital system transportation services to remove Driver #1 from transporting facility residents to any external appointments, Effective at 8:40 pm on 10/11/24.
Beginning 10/12/24, the Passenger Services Manager will conduct in person training with all transportation drivers assigned to the facility, including return demonstration of offloading and securement of passengers. The training will include the Safety Briefing slide (providing a visual of the correct position for the liftgate); the Passenger Services Liftgate Use; Patient Safety Check requirements. Training and Education will also include offloading residents from the van and proper securement with the wheelchair van wheelchair and resident securement system according to the manufacturer's instructions. Competency skills checklist was completed for all drivers and continues annually upon orientation.
Any transportation drivers who do not receive the education by 10/12/24 (due to FMLA, leave, etc.) will be required to complete education prior to working a scheduled shift. All newly hired drivers assigned to the facility will be required to complete this training and education upon hire and all drivers will be required to complete this education annually.
Beginning 10/12/24, the Passenger Services Manager will provide documented evidence of training and education of all assigned drivers to the Administrator and Director of Nursing.
Alleged Date of Immediate Jeopardy Removal: 10/15/24
The facility's immediate jeopardy removal plan was validated on 10/16/24 by the following:
The facility provided documentation to support their corrective action plan including education provided by the Passenger Services Manager to the current drivers who operate the hospital owned transportation vans. The documentation was reviewed for each driver and each driver was found to have received the education and it was documented each driver provided return demonstration to the Passenger Services Manager. Driver #2 demonstrated the correct method to secure a wheelchair with a resident into the hospital owned transportation van using the securement system. Driver #2 demonstrated the correct procedure to remove a resident from the hospital owned transportation van including riding the hospital owned transportation van lift gate to the back of the hospital owned transportation van and entering the hospital owned transportation van from the rear. Interviews were conducted with a sample of drivers, and they were able to report the pre-trip safety checklist, securing a wheelchair passenger into the hospital owned transportation van, and safe removal of a wheelchair passenger from the hospital owned transportation van.
The facility's date of Immediate Jeopardy removal of 10/15/24 was validated.
Based on observations, record review, review of audio/video footage, and Nurse Practitioner (NP), Passenger Services Manager, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide safe transportation for Resident #45 in the hospital system transportation van to the dialysis center. On 2/9/24 while en route Driver #1 stopped abruptly, and Resident #45 slid out of his wheelchair to the floor of the van. Driver #1 was unable to assist Resident #45 back into his wheelchair and proceeded to drive to the dialysis center with Resident #45 sitting on the floor of the van. In addition, on 8/12/24, Driver #1 failed to ensure the lift gate was in the elevated position before unloading Resident #62 from the back from the van. Driver #1 stood behind Resident #62's wheelchair and wheeled Resident #62 towards the back of the van and lift gate. Driver #1 fell out of the back of the transportation van and Resident #62 and his wheelchair rolled out of the back of the transportation van and landed on top of Driver #1. There was a high likelihood of a serious adverse outcome or injury when the manufacturer's instructions for securing and unloading residents from the transportation van are not followed. This was for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #45 and Resident #62).
Immediate jeopardy began on 2/9/24 when Resident #45 fell to the floor of the transportation van while being transported to his dialysis appointment. Immediate jeopardy began on 8/12/24 for Resident #62 when Driver #1 wheeled the resident out of the back of the
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure residents personal health information by leaving shift report documentation and a medication cart laptop unattended with resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure residents personal health information by leaving shift report documentation and a medication cart laptop unattended with resident information exposed in an area accessible and visible to the public on 1 of 3 Medication Carts (600 Hall Medication Cart).
The findings included:
While walking down the 600 hall, an observation was completed on 10/10/24 at 10:36 AM of the 600 Hall Medication Cart inclusive of the medication cart laptop which was unattended. The laptop displayed resident personal health information including names, medications, and diagnoses. The 600 Hall shift report documentation was also observed to be face up which displayed resident personal health information. Staff was observed passing by the 600 Hall Medication Cart.
On 10/10/24 at 10:38 AM Nurse #4 returned to the 600 Hall Medication Cart. Nurse #4 closed the laptop screen and verbalized her medication cart was locked but she forgot to close her laptop.
An interview was completed with Nurse #4 on 10/10/24 at 10:39 AM. Nurse #4 stated she was retrieving dry cereal for a resident and forgot to close her medication cart laptop. Nurse #4 explained she should have closed the medication cart laptop while not in attendance. Nurse #4 also voiced she should have turned her shift report documentation over while not in attendance of the 600 Hall Medication Cart.
An interview with the interim Director of Nursing (DON) was completed on 10/10/24 11:16 AM. The interim DON revealed that Nurse #4 should have locked her laptop screen prior to leaving the medication cart unattended. The interim DON further stated that the nurse should have turned over her clip board to protect resident health information.
An interview with the Director of Nursing Services was completed on 10/14/24 at 4:07 PM. The Director of Nursing Services explained anytime staff were not with their medication cart the medication cart should be locked. The Director of Nursing Services continued to explain that staff should lock or lower their computer screen so that protected health information (PHI) was not exposed and shift report documentation should also be flipped over so that PHI was not exposed and no one could read as they passed by.
An interview with the unlicensed Administrator was completed on 10/14/24 at 4:34 PM. She stated staff should lock or minimize their laptop screen or turn the medication cart towards the wall so the public cannot view protected health information. The unlicensed Administrator further stated that shift report documentation should be flipped over when the nurse left the medication cart unattended.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label the gastrostomy feeding formula with the...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label the gastrostomy feeding formula with the flow rate and the time the formula was hung for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding (Resident #40).
The findings included:
Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included anoxic brain injury, tracheostomy (a hole that surgeons make through the front of the neck and into the windpipe or trachea), persistent vegetative state, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (medical procedure where a tube is inserted through the abdominal wall and into the stomach) tube placement.
The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was rarely/never understood and rarely/never made decisions. The nutritional approach while a resident was via feeding tube.
Review of Resident #40's care plan revealed the resident required a permanent feeding tube for the provision of nutrition. The goal for Resident #40 was to maintain adequate nutritional and hydration status as evidenced by stable weight, and no indicators of malnutrition or dehydration.
Review of a physician order dated 11/16/23 revealed an order for Resident #40 to receive continuous feeding formula infused at 45 milliliters (ml) per hour via pump infusion. Flush enteral tube with 30 ml of water every hour via pump.
The manufacturer's information stated prefilled containers can hang safely for up to 48 hours when clean technique and only one new feeding set is used.
An observation conducted of Resident #40 on 10/07/24 at 12:57 PM revealed the resident's tube feeding formula labeling information was written on a cloth surgical tape which only contained the date, name of resident and initials of nurse. There was no information about the time it was hung and flow rate based on the order. The pump was running at 45 ml per hour.
An interview with Nurse #2 was conducted on 10/07/24 at 1:18 PM revealed the feeding formula was hung by the nurse working on night shift. Nurse #2 verbalized the label should indicate the name of the resident, date and time tube feeding was placed, the rate, and the name or initials of the nurse.
An interview with Nurse #3 on 10/11/24 at 1:09 PM revealed she worked from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM on 10/06/24 and confirmed taking care of Resident #40. Nurse #3 said she had been labeling tube feedings as observed and nobody had said anything about what she's been doing.
An interview conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/11/24 at 4:20 PM revealed the facility nurses were aware of what needed to be done. The Interim DON further stated that the facility nurses knew the policy. The Interim DON verbalized staff do things to finish quicker.
An interview conducted with the unlicensed Administrator on 10/16/24 at 4:45 PM revealed she was still investigating the findings. The unlicensed Administrator verbalized that anytime there was tube feeding, it should be labeled appropriately.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to post cautionary and safety signage indicating th...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to post cautionary and safety signage indicating the use of oxygen outside resident rooms for 3 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #40, Resident #41 and Resident #56).
The findings included:
1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of tracheostomy (a hole that surgeons make through the front of the neck and into the windpipe or trachea).
The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was rarely/never understood and rarely/never made decisions. The respiratory treatment while a resident was oxygen therapy.
A physician's order for Resident #40 dated 10/10/24 revealed to keep the resident's oxygen saturation above 90% and wean to maintain saturation of >90% via tracheostomy collar.
During an observation on 10/07/24 at 12:55 PM, no signage for oxygen use was found anywhere near Resident #40's room entrance. Resident #40 was observed on oxygen via tracheostomy collar at 5 liters per minute.
An interview conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/11/24 at 4:21 PM revealed the facility consolidated all the residents to halls 400, 500, and 600. Resident #40 moved from 300 hall to 400 hall last week. The Interim DON expressed that before the transfer occurred, the staff went around the facility to ensure oxygen signs were in place at each resident's room requiring oxygen use. The Interim DON verbalized whoever nurse admitted a resident requiring oxygen should make sure necessary items were prepared.
An interview conducted with the unlicensed Administrator on 10/16/24 at 4:43PM revealed staff had moved all residents to halls 400, 500 and 600 on 10/04/24. The unlicensed Administrator further revealed staff did not have the chance to make sure cautionary oxygen signage was placed in all residents' rooms that were ordered oxygen. All residents that receive oxygen should have a cautionary signage.
2. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included respiratory failure and seizure disorder.
The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #41 was severely cognitively impaired, received tracheostomy care (a hole that surgeons make through the front of the neck and into the windpipe or trachea) and oxygen (O2) therapy.
Review of physician order dated 10/1/24 indicated a modification. The order sated oxygen adult low flow nasal cannula/O2 at 5 liters per minute (lpm) continuous with 28% humidification via trach for hypoxia prevention.
Observation on 10/8/24 at 9:19AM revealed Resident #41in his bed receiving oxygen via tracheostomy. There was no cautionary signage indicating the use of oxygen on Resident #41's door.
An observation of Resident #41 on 10/9/24 at 10:45AM revealed him receiving oxygen via tracheostomy. There was no cautionary signage indicating the use of oxygen on Resident #41's door.
Interview and observation with Nurse #6 on 10/9/24 at 2:54PM stated she believed it would be the responsibility of the nurse to place oxygen signage on residents' doors. She stated it should be done upon admission or when the resident received an order to use oxygen. Upon observation of Resident #41's room she stated the resident did use oxygen and did not have signage identifying the use of oxygen.
Interview and observation with the Interim Director of Nursing on 10/9/24 at 2:58PM revealed it was the responsibly of the admitting nurse or the responsibility of the nurse working when the resident obtained an order for O2 to apply cautionary signage. She further revealed oxygen signage was kept in the oxygen storage room. Upon observation of Resident #41's room the Interim Director or Nursing indicated there was not signage and there should have been signage. She stated the error occurred with they recently moved several residents to consolidate halls. The signage must not have followed the residents.
An interview conducted with Unlicensed Administrator on 10/16/24 at 4:43PM revealed staff had moved all residents to halls 400, 500 and 600 on 10/04/24. The Unlicensed Administrator further revealed staff did not have the chance to make sure cautionary oxygen signage was placed on all resident rooms that were ordered oxygen. All residents that receive oxygen should have cautionary signage.
3. Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia.
Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 was moderately cognitively impaired and had oxygen in use upon admission.
Review of Resident #56 physician order dated 10/1/24 stated oxygen adult low flow nasal cannula 3-7. May increase flow rate to 3 to keep saturation of peripheral oxygen (spO2) greater than 90% and wean as tolerated to maintain spO2 at 90% or greater.
Observation of Resident #56 on 10/8/24 at 8:48AM revealed him to be seated in his wheelchair with nasal cannula applied with oxygen running. There was no cautionary signage to Resident #54's room identifying oxygen was in use.
Interview and observation with Nurse #6 on 10/9/24 at 2:54PM stated she believed it would be the responsibility of the nurse to place oxygen signage on residents' doors. She stated it should be done upon admission or when the resident received an order to use oxygen. Upon observation of Resident #56's room she stated the resident did use oxygen and did not have signage identifying the use of oxygen.
Interview and observation with the Interim Director of Nursing on 10/9/24 at 2:58PM revealed it was the responsibly of the admitting nurse or the responsibility of the nurse working when the resident obtained an order for O2 to apply cautionary signage. She further revealed oxygen signage was kept in the oxygen storage room. Upon observation of Resident #56's room, the Interim Director or Nursing indicated there was not signage and there should have been signage. She stated the error occurred with they recently moved several residents to consolidate halls. The signage must not have followed the residents.
An interview conducted with Unlicensed Administrator on 10/16/24 at 4:43PM revealed staff had moved all residents to halls 400, 500 and 600 on 10/04/24. The Unlicensed Administrator further revealed staff did not have the chance to make sure cautionary oxygen signage was placed on all resident rooms that were ordered oxygen. All residents that receive oxygen should have cautionary signage.
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record review,and pharmacist and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date an opened vial of Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) stored in 1 of 1 medication room ref...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, record review,and pharmacist and staff interviews, the facility failed to label and date an opened vial of Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) stored in 1 of 1 medication room refrigerator reviewed for medication storage.
The findings included:
A review of the manufacturer's recommendation for Purified Protein Derivative (PPD) storage, PPD vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation which may affect potency.
An observation was completed of the medication room refrigerator with the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/10/24 at 10:03 AM revealed an opened PPD vial in a plastic pouch. The affixed sticker had a dispensed date of 08/2/24. There was no open date or discard date marked on the box/pouch.
During an interview with the Interim DON on 10/10/24 at 10:07 AM, the Interim DON verbalized the nurses, and the pharmacist had access to the medication room refrigerator. The Interim DON verbalized she was surprised to see the opened and unlabeled PPD solution had not been discarded. The Interim DON verbalized the pharmacist finished checking the cart and medication room refrigerator last on 10/07/24. The Interim DON removed the PPD solution in question.
An interview with the Pharmacist on 10/11/24 at 1:19 PM revealed the Pharmacist inspected the medication room, treatment carts, and medication carts monthly. Last time she conducted her inspection was 10/07/24. The Pharmacist stated that any vial, once opened, should be labeled with open and discard date.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff, family, resident and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff, family, resident and Nurse Practitioner (NP) interviews, the facility failed to obtain a referral, schedule or arrange an audiology appointment, or and screening for a resident with sensory neural hearing loss whose hearing aids did not fit properly for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #45) reviewed with hearing loss.
The findings included:
Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included cognitive decline and asymmetrical sensory-neural hearing loss.
The care plan dated 1/22/24 indicated Resident #45 had a hearing deficit due to hearing loss as evidence by wearing bilateral hearing aids. The goal stated Resident #45 would understand verbal communication as evidence by appropriate response. The interventions included involve in activities that don't depend on hearing, parties, craft games, and small groups. Speak clearly/distinctly, adjust tone and volume of voice as necessary and monitor for changes in condition.
A nursing note dated 2/8/24 indicated Resident #45 arrived at the facility via stretcher accompanied by Emergency Medical Services following a hospitalization. Resident #45 was alert, oriented and able to verbalize his needs. The note continued that Resident #45 was hard of hearing (HOH) and had hearing aids.
A Speech Therapy note dated 3/6/24 included Resident #45 required written down information (visual cues), as Resident #45 was extremely HOH and hearing aids did not work.
Review of Occupational Therapy note dated 3/8/24 stated Resident #45 asked, can you put my hearing aids in. The note did not indicate if Resident #45's hearing aid were put in.
Review of a Social Worker (SW) note written by the previous SW dated 8/7/24 stated Resident #45 was watching television with the volume loud as he was HOH. The note continued that Resident #45 had a new roommate who was trying to visit with his wife but was unable to due to Resident #45's loud television. Resident #45 gave the Social Worker permission to turn volume down but seemed aggravated. Resident #45 was alert and appeared oriented. It was a difficult to converse with Resident #45 due to him being extremely HOH. Resident #45 asked the Social Worker to write a question on paper and he answered them appropriately.
An interview was attempted with the previous SW. He was unable to be reached by phone.
Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 was cognitively intact. Resident #45 was further coded as having moderate hearing loss and was using hearing aids.
An observation of Resident #45 on 10/7/24 at 4:50 PM revealed him to be watching television with headphones. The headphones were held to his ears with tape attached across both earlobes. The tape was holding in place the wires attached to the earbuds.
An interview and observation was conducted (via writing) with Resident #45 on 10/10/24 at 1:40 PM. Resident #45 was observed to be watching television in his room with earphones taped in his ears. Resident #45 revealed he had hearing aids, but no one knew how to put them in. Resident #45 stated he could not put them in himself because his hands didn't work like they used to. Resident #45 stated his hearing aids were in a basket on his nightstand. Observation of Resident #45's nightstand revealed a basket with random items. At the bottom of the basket was a chargeable hearing aid case. There were 2 hearing aids observed in the unplugged chargeable hearing aid case.
During an interview with the SW on 10/10/24 at 2:04 PM revealed Resident #45 was hard of hearing and required staff to increase their tone or write to him. Resident #45 used headphones (earbuds) to watch TV because he needed the TV loud to hear it. The SW was not aware of any issues regarding Resident #45's hearing aids not working properly. She indicated if a resident had a referral for an outside appointment, it would be scheduled by transportation department.
An interview with Resident #45's family member on 10/11/24 at 9:04 AM indicated he had spoken with the facility (name of staff and date unknown) regarding his family member's hearing aids. He stated when he visited the hearing aids were not in Resident #45's ears. He stated he had communicated to the facility (name of staff and date unknown) that they would have to be taken into the store they were purchased, because the store could service the device by turning the volume up or down and changing the filters. He indicated he did not believe the facility had taken the hearing aids to be serviced. He recalled having to take the device to the store to have the filters changed but he could not recall the date.
An interview and observation with Nursing Assistant (NA) #3 on 10/10/24 at 1:44 PM revealed Resident #45 was very hard of hearing. She stated he had to get headphones for his television because he had it too loud. Resident #45 did have hearing aids, and they worked. Resident #45 was unable to put his hearing aids in without assistance. She indicated she has tried to put them in Resident #45's ears but they were weirdly shaped and sometimes she couldn't. She stated she has communicated to nurse (name unknown) that Resident #45's hearing aids were difficult to put in. She indicated she recalled the nurse coming in the room and trying and being unsuccessful. She stated his hearing aids did not use batteries but were kept in a charging device. NA #3 stated the last time she worked with Resident #45 she recalled putting in his hearing aids after Resident #45 requested them for a dialysis appointment. She further indicated she might be putting them in his ears wrong. During the observation of Resident #45's hearing aids, NA #3 stated the part that sat in the cartilage of Resident #45's ear did not fit correctly so they won't stay in his ears.
An interview with NA #1 on 10/10/24 at 2:37 PM revealed Resident #45 was very hard of hearing and wore hearing aids. She stated when working with him she had not tried to help him put his hearing aids in. Resident #45 has issues with his hands and was not able to put his hearing aids in himself. She further indicated he had not been wearing them and she wasn't sure if it was the responsibility of the nurse or the NA to put them in. She had to get really close to Resident #45 for him to hear, and stated he always said he can't hear anything. NA #1 indicated NAs would look at the resident summary to identify what was required for each resident but could not recall if Resident #45's summary indicated apply hearing aids.
Nurse #2 was interviewed on 10/10/24 at 2:03 PM and revealed she was assigned to Resident #45. She stated Resident #45 did have hearing aids but due to not working with Resident #45 for a week she was unsure of when the last time he wore them. Resident #45 was unable to put his hearing aids in himself. Nurse #2 indicated she had never put them in due to it being an NA responsibility.
An interview with NA #4 on 10/10/24 at 3:16 PM indicated Resident #45 did not wear hearing aids. She stated he wore earbuds to watch television. There was tape on the earbuds to keep them from falling out of Resident #45's ears. She indicated it was her second day and this was her first time working with Resident #45. She indicated she was unsure if there was a guide that identified what the resident's activities of daily living needs were as she was new and still taking direction from NA#5. Resident #45 was very hard of hearing. She indicated she had to almost holler at him for Resident #45 to hear her.
An interview with NA #5 on 10/10/24 at 3:32 PM revealed she recalled being assigned to Resident #45. She stated she had not seen Resident #45 with hearing aids and had not observed hearing aids in his room. Resident #45 had told her he was hard of hearing and that he preferred for staff to get close to his ear when speaking to him. NA #5 stated the electronic medical record would identify if a resident wore hearing aids or had to have hearing aids applied. She had not observed in the medical record that Resident #45 had hearing aids or needed assistance applying them.
An interview with Nurse #5 on 10/10/24 at 3:20 PM indicated he had worked with Resident #45. He further revealed he had not seen Resident #45 with hearing aids. Nurse #5 stated Resident #45 did wear headphones when he watched TV because he needed it to be loud. The tape on his ears were to hold the headphones in place. When speaking to Resident #45 he had to speak very loudly so Resident #45 could hear him. He stated if hearing aids were not documented in the resident record on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) or care plan, he wouldn't have looked for them.
An interview with the Interim Director of Nursing on 10/10/24 at 2:16 PM indicated Resident #45's hearing aids were placed in his ears when staff could get them in his ears. She recalled having a hard time putting Resident #45's hearing aids in one day when he had an appointment to dialysis. The Interim Director of Nursing couldn't get them in and had to request assistance from another nurse. She indicated it was the NAs that would be tasked with putting in his hearing aids. She did not get a referral for Resident #45's hearing aids or notify the physician because a nurse (name unknown) was able to get them in. Issues with hearing aids should be brought to the attention of administration so the SW could do something like get an appointment. She was unsure if the concerns with Resident #45 made it to the SW.
The unlicensed Administrator was interviewed on 10/10/24 at 2:06 PM. She stated Resident #45 wore earphones when he watched television. She stated she had not personally assisted Resident #45 with applying his hearing aids. From staff communication, Resident #45 did not always wear his hearing aids, but she was unsure of the cause. The unlicensed Administrator just understood he didn't like to wear them. She revealed if Resident #45's hearing aids were not fitting appropriately the facility should have gotten him an appointment and discussed the hearing aids with the Resident's family, especially if it was hindering Resident #45's care. The unlicensed Administrator recalled the SW discussing the hearing aids with the resident's family but was unaware if there was a note about the discussion.
An interview with the NP on 10/14/24 at 11:00 AM revealed she recalled Resident #45 being hard of hearing. She indicated she did not recall any issues regarding his hearing aids. Resident #45 did not have the dexterity (skill in performing task, especially with the hands) to put in his own hearing aids. The NP stated if the hearing aids were not working or not fitting properly Resident #45 should have been sent out for a referral or at least be evaluated.
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0837
(Tag F0837)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and staff and the Executive Director of the NC Board of Nursing Home Administrators interviews, the faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, and staff and the Executive Director of the NC Board of Nursing Home Administrators interviews, the facility failed to have a licensed Administrator in place to oversee the daily staff and resident operations of the skilled nursing facility. This failure had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.
The findings included:
An interview was completed with the Executive Director of the NC Board of Nursing Home Administrators on [DATE] at 11:12 AM. The Executive Director of the NC Board of Nursing Home Administrators was notified on [DATE] by the unlicensed Administrator via telephone call that her license had expired on [DATE]. The Executive Director of the NC Board of Nursing Home Administrators explained the unlicensed Administrator was being honest and stated she forgot to renew her license at the end of September. The Executive Director of the NC Board of Nursing Home Administrators verbalized the unlicensed Administrator's license was originally issued on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. The Executive Director of the NC Board of Nursing Home Administrators communicated a temporary license was issued to the unlicensed Administrator on the afternoon of [DATE] which will expire on [DATE].
A telephone interview with the unlicensed Administrator was completed on [DATE] at 11:09 AM. She explained she was under the impression the deadline for administrator license renewal was extended due to Hurricane [NAME]. The unlicensed Administrator stated she reached out to the NC Board of Nursing Home Administrators and they informed her she was not eligible for the extension due to not being in an affected area. The unlicensed Administrator stated that she had to reapply for her Administrator license and was granted a temporary license effective [DATE] with an expiration date of [DATE].
A telephone interview was completed on [DATE] at 1:45 PM with the [NAME] President (VP) for Advocate Health which includes oversight for the nursing home administrators across the hospital healthcare system. The VP for Advocate Health stated the unlicensed Administrator telephoned him on [DATE] to inform him her license had expired. He further stated the temporary license paperwork was completed the afternoon of [DATE]. The VP of Advocate Health communicated ultimately the Administrators were responsible for making sure their license remained current. The VP of Advocate Health voiced moving forward he and his administrative staff will work with the current Administrators to ensure that issue dates and expiration dates were obtained and reviewed so that all Administrators have an active license within the hospital healthcare system's skilled nursing facilities.