Southwood Nursing and Retirement
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Families considering Southwood Nursing and Retirement in Clinton, North Carolina, should note that it has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating a decent quality of care that is slightly above average. It ranks #124 out of 417 facilities in North Carolina, placing it in the top half, and is the best option out of the two nursing homes in Sampson County. The facility's performance has been stable, with three issues reported in both 2024 and 2025. Staffing is a weakness, with a below-average rating of 2 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 57%, which is slightly above the state average. On a concerning note, the facility has been fined $8,512, which is typical compared to other facilities, but it has less RN coverage than 90% of its peers, potentially impacting the quality of care. Specific incidents include a serious failure to use a mechanical lift during a transfer, resulting in a resident suffering a fractured femur, and issues with food safety procedures that could affect residents’ health. Overall, while there are some strengths, families should weigh these concerns carefully.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In North Carolina
- #124/417
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $8,512 in fines. Higher than 78% of North Carolina facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 17 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for North Carolina. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
11pts above North Carolina avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
9 points above North Carolina average of 48%
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, Resident interview and staff interviews, the facility failed to obtain the blood sugar (BS) level and ad...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and resident, staff and Nurse Practitioner interviews, the facility failed to administer o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have a complete and accurate electronic medical record (EMR)...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
2 deficiencies
2 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, Physician, staff and Resident interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe transfer when Nurse Aid...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Physician, staff, resident interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 agency Nurse Aides (NAs) i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, staff, and resident interviews the facility failed to provide a dependent resident with nail care and fac...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified with...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to secure a medication for one of four medication carts observed (medication cart #1).
Findings included:
On 9/7/22 at 10:30 AM through ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to date leftover food stored for use in one of one kitchen walk-in refrigerator and failed to date leftover food in one of one nourishme...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a Legionella Prevention program. This had the potential to effect 70 of 70 residents.
Findings included:
Rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 10 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Southwood Nursing And Retirement's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Southwood Nursing and Retirement an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within North Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Southwood Nursing And Retirement Staffed?
CMS rates Southwood Nursing and Retirement's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 57%, which is 11 percentage points above the North Carolina average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Southwood Nursing And Retirement?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at Southwood Nursing and Retirement during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 8 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Southwood Nursing And Retirement?
Southwood Nursing and Retirement is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LIBERTY SENIOR LIVING, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 100 certified beds and approximately 86 residents (about 86% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Clinton, North Carolina.
How Does Southwood Nursing And Retirement Compare to Other North Carolina Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Carolina, Southwood Nursing and Retirement's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (57%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Southwood Nursing And Retirement?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Southwood Nursing And Retirement Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Southwood Nursing and Retirement has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Carolina. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Southwood Nursing And Retirement Stick Around?
Staff turnover at Southwood Nursing and Retirement is high. At 57%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the North Carolina average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Southwood Nursing And Retirement Ever Fined?
Southwood Nursing and Retirement has been fined $8,512 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the North Carolina average of $33,164. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Southwood Nursing And Retirement on Any Federal Watch List?
Southwood Nursing and Retirement is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.