GOLDEN ACRES MANOR
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Golden Acres Manor has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is considered decent and slightly above average compared to other facilities. In North Dakota, it ranks #49 out of 72, placing it in the bottom half, but it is the only option in Foster County. Unfortunately, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 1 in 2024 to 6 in 2025. Staffing is a strength, with a turnover rate of 0%, indicating that staff members stay long-term, and there is more RN coverage than 98% of state facilities, which is excellent for resident care. However, there are concerns, including a failure to maintain a clean kitchen environment that could lead to foodborne illnesses and lapses in infection control practices, risking the spread of infections among residents.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In North Dakota
- #49/72
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most North Dakota facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 87 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of North Dakota nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below North Dakota average (3.1)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
May 2025
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of a facility reported incident (FRI), policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plans to reflect the residents' current status for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of professional reference, review of manufacturer's instructions, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed standards of practice for 2 of 9 supple...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0699
(Tag F0699)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess residents with a history of trauma and identify known triggers for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of professional reference, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen environment for 1 of 1 kitchen and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 4 of 15 sampled residents (#16, #20, #32, and #40)...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of facility policy/procedure, review of professional reference, review of food temperature logs, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepar...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of professional reference and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #10) reviewed for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based observation, record review, review of professional reference, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision/assistance to prevent accide...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
- Observation on 05/23/23 at 10:32 a.m. showed a CNA (#4) provided personal cares to Resident #4. The CNA performed hand hygiene, donned gloves, and used washcloths to wash the resident's upper and lo...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most North Dakota facilities.
- • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
About This Facility
What is Golden Acres Manor's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns GOLDEN ACRES MANOR an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Golden Acres Manor Staffed?
CMS rates GOLDEN ACRES MANOR's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Golden Acres Manor?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at GOLDEN ACRES MANOR during 2023 to 2025. These included: 10 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Golden Acres Manor?
GOLDEN ACRES MANOR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 64 certified beds and approximately 52 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CARRINGTON, North Dakota.
How Does Golden Acres Manor Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, GOLDEN ACRES MANOR's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1 and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Golden Acres Manor?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Golden Acres Manor Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, GOLDEN ACRES MANOR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Golden Acres Manor Stick Around?
GOLDEN ACRES MANOR has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Golden Acres Manor Ever Fined?
GOLDEN ACRES MANOR has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Golden Acres Manor on Any Federal Watch List?
GOLDEN ACRES MANOR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.