GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER

107 12TH ST S, COOPERSTOWN, ND 58425 (701) 797-2221
Non profit - Corporation 40 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
70/100
#23 of 72 in ND
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Griggs County Care Center has a Trust Grade of B, which indicates it is a good choice among nursing homes, reflecting solid care and services. It ranks #23 out of 72 facilities in North Dakota, placing it in the top half, and is the only option in Griggs County. The facility is improving, with reported issues decreasing from two in 2023 to just one in 2024. Staffing is rated at 4 out of 5 stars, but the turnover rate is 57%, which is average for the state; however, they have no fines on record, which is a positive sign. Some specific incidents raised concerns, including a serious injury to a resident during a lift transfer due to inadequate safety measures, and a dietary manager lacking the necessary qualifications, which could pose risks for food safety. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and no fines, families should be aware of the safety concerns and staff qualifications at this facility.

Trust Score
B
70/100
In North Dakota
#23/72
Top 31%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
2 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most North Dakota facilities.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 40 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for North Dakota. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
✓ Good
Only 3 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
★★★★☆
4.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2024: 1 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 57%

11pts above North Dakota avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Staff turnover is elevated (57%)

9 points above North Dakota average of 48%

The Ugly 3 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0801 (Tag F0801)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 dietary manager (#1) obtained the proper qualifications to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. Failure to ensure staff ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 dietary manager (#1) obtained the proper qualifications to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. Failure to ensure staff have the qualifications to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services has the potential to result in foodborne illness to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: During on interview on 07/29/24 at 11:15 a.m., the dietary manager (#1) stated she is currently enrolled in a certified dietary manager course but has not completed it. The facility failed to ensure the dietary manager (#1) completed the required education for a certified dietary manager, certified food service manager, or a national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body.
Nov 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, review of the facility reported investigation, review of facility policy, stand lift Operat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, review of the facility reported investigation, review of facility policy, stand lift Operator's Instructions, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate safety/supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #1) who sustained a major injury during an EZ stand lift (mechanical sit-to-stand lift). Failure to follow the facility policy for EZ stand transfers and safety interventions resulted in a fracture of Resident #1's left arm. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, EZ Stand Lift occurred on 11/29/23. This policy, revised 02/13/18, stated, . Purpose: To lift and transfer resident/patient safely with as little physical effort as possible. Position the EZ stand in front of the resident/patient. Have the resident/patient place his feet (or help as needed) on platform and position his shins into the shin forms. Place leg strap around legs, buckle, and pull the strap to tighten. The EZ Way Smart Stand Operator's Instructions, page 6, stated, . Use of Shin Pad Strap: If a caregiver deems it necessary to keep a patient's shins or feet on the foot plate, secure the shin strap around the patient's legs. Review of Resident #1's medical record occurred on 11/29/23. Diagnoses included paralytic syndrome (weakness/paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side and contractures of the left hand and left shoulder muscle. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The care plan at the time of the incident indicated EZ stand transfers with one assist. The facility reported a fall incident to the state agency on 11/22/23 and immediately started an investigation. The facility's final investigation report stated, on 11/22/23 at 9:00 a.m., . Resident was being transferred via E-Z stand lift. While transferring, resident's knees gave out and went to the side and her arms 'chicken winged' and started to slide out of the lift. A chair placed under the resident and she was assisted via Hoyer lift. Resident later complained of pain to the left shoulder. She was taken to the emergency department and diagnosed with a closed displaced fracture of the left humerus bone received. Resident to not be lifted all the way up in the lift . may have been lifted too high in the lift which caused her left arm to slip out. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 2:58 p.m., when asked about the events that occurred on 11/22/23, Resident #1 confirmed two staff were present during the EZ stand lift transfer, and stated, They [the CNAs] didn't have my feet on the platform properly before they started to stand me up. When asked if staff used the leg straps during the transfer, she stated no and further stated they never do. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 4:11 p.m., the CNA (#1) stated Resident #1's legs went to the side (indicating to the left) as they began to lift the resident. When asked if she used the leg straps during Resident #1's transfer on 11/22/23, the CNA (#1) stated, No. During an interview on 11/29/23 at 4:34 p.m., two physical therapy staff members (#4 and #5) stated they would expect staff to use the EZ stand as ordered and use the leg straps per facility policy. The facility staff failed to strap Resident #1's legs into the EZ stand lift and ensure the resident was not lifted too high during a transfer which resulted in a fracture.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #32), with a CPAP (Continuous ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #32), with a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) machine. Failure of facility staff to clarify physician's order for cleaning a CPAP resulted in staff incorrectly documenting the cleaning method. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included dependence on supplemental oxygen and dependence on enabling machines and devices (CPAP machine). Physician orders included, clean and prepare CPAP machine for nightly use - wash with mild detergent and warm water - water well, mask, tubing, head gear. Allow to air dry. Once a day. Resident #32's care plan stated to use the CPAP as ordered. The Administration History report, dated 09/01/23 to 09/13/23, showed facility staff signed the document that they cleaned Resident #32's CPAP mask and tubing with mild soap and water every morning. Observation on all days of survey showed Resident #32's CPAP mask and tubing connected to a sanitizing device and cleaning machine. During an interview on 09/12/23 at 9:30 a.m. Resident #32 stated the CPAP mask and tubing are placed in the sanitizing device every morning. During an interview on 09/12/23 at 4:10 p.m. an administrative staff member (#1) reported he/she is unaware when Resident #32 received the sanitizing device and confirmed staff failed to update the order. Failure of staff to contact the physician for clarification of the order for cleaning Resident #32's CPAP machine resulted in incorrect documentation of the cleaning method for the CPAP.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most North Dakota facilities.
Concerns
  • • 3 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Bottom line: Mixed indicators with Trust Score of 70/100. Visit in person and ask pointed questions.

About This Facility

What is Griggs County's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Griggs County Staffed?

CMS rates GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 57%, which is 11 percentage points above the North Dakota average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Griggs County?

State health inspectors documented 3 deficiencies at GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 2 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Griggs County?

GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 40 certified beds and approximately 39 residents (about 98% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in COOPERSTOWN, North Dakota.

How Does Griggs County Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (57%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Griggs County?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Griggs County Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Griggs County Stick Around?

Staff turnover at GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER is high. At 57%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the North Dakota average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 60%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Griggs County Ever Fined?

GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Griggs County on Any Federal Watch List?

GRIGGS COUNTY CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.