SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA

501 19TH ST NE, JAMESTOWN, ND 58401 (701) 252-5660
Non profit - Corporation 100 Beds SMP HEALTH Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
83/100
#11 of 72 in ND
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

SMP Health - Ave Maria has received a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #11 out of 72 nursing homes in North Dakota, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and is the best option among the two homes in Stutsman County. However, the facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 2 in 2023 to 4 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 34%, which is significantly better than the state average of 48%. Despite these strengths, the home has faced concerning incidents, including a serious case where a staff member placed a rag in a resident's mouth to silence her, highlighting a failure to protect residents from mental and physical abuse. Additionally, there were concerns about infection control practices, such as not disinfecting shared equipment properly. Overall, while there are commendable aspects, potential residents and their families should be aware of the facility's recent challenges.

Trust Score
B+
83/100
In North Dakota
#11/72
Top 15%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Worse
2 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
34% turnover. Near North Dakota's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
○ Average
$6,788 in fines. Higher than 56% of North Dakota facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 55 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for North Dakota. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
○ Average
7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 2 issues
2024: 4 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (34%)

    14 points below North Dakota average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 34%

12pts below North Dakota avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $6,788

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: SMP HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record

1 actual harm
Sept 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, review of the North Dakota Long Term Care Ombudsman Program Guide to Resident Rights, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promoted, maintain...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, review of the North Dakota Long Term Care Ombudsman Program Guide to Resident Rights, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promoted, maintained, or enhanced the resident's dignity for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #3) with a wound vacuum. Failure to cover a wound vacuum collection container does not preserve the resident's personal dignity and/or enhance their quality of life and has the potential to affect the resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The North Dakota Long Term Care Ombudsman Program's Guide to Resident Rights, updated 03/21/23, page 16, stated, . The facility must treat you courteously, fairly and with dignity. Observation on 09/10/24 at 11:21 a.m. showed Resident #3 sitting in the hallway in front of the television with the wound vacuum and its contents visible. Observation on 09/10/24 at 11:44 a.m. showed Resident #3 sitting in the hallway in front of the television with a hand towel partially covering the wound vacuum canister, however, the contents of the wound vacuum canister remained visible. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 3:25 p.m., an administrative nurse (#2) stated wound vacuum containers should be covered when residents are out of their room.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #70) observed receiving medication f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #70) observed receiving medication from an injector pen. Failure to obtain a label for an insulin pen may result in a resident receiving the wrong medication or an incorrect dose. Findings include: Review of a policy titled Medication Storage/Labeling occurred on 09/11/24. This policy, revised July 2024, stated, . Medications are labeled by pharmacy. If receiving medications from any mail order pharmacies that are not labeled individually, label with resident identification information . Observation on 07/10/24 at 8:17 a.m. showed a nurse (#1) prepared Resident #70's Novolog insulin pen for administration. The pharmacy label on the pen lacked a legible label with the resident's name or other identifying information. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 2:44 p.m., an administrative nurse (#2) confirmed Resident #70's Novolog insulin pen lacked a legible label.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** ENHANCED BARRIER PRECAUTIONS Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions occurred on 09/11/24. This polic...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** ENHANCED BARRIER PRECAUTIONS Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions occurred on 09/11/24. This policy, dated March 2024, stated, . It is the policy of SMP [Sisters of the [NAME] Presentation] Health-Ave [NAME] to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. PPE [personal protective equipment] for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities . High-contact resident activities include: a. Dressing . c. Transferring d. Providing hygiene . f. Changing briefs . h. Wound care . Observation on 09/10/24 at 8:14 a.m. showed an EBP sign on Resident #3's door and isolation carts inside the resident's room. Observation showed a CNA (#7) wore gloves and assisted Resident #3 with changing her brief, personal hygiene, and dressing. At 8:17 a.m., a second CNA (#6) entered the resident's room, donned gloves and assisted with transferring the resident from bed to the wheelchair. The CNAs (#6 and #7) failed to wear a gown as required. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 3:25 p.m., an administrative nurse (#2) stated she expected staff to wear a gown when providing cares to residents in enhanced barrier precautions. CLEANING OF GLUCOMETER Review of policy titled Testing Blood Glucose and Meter Use occurred on 09/11/24. This policy, revised July 2024, stated, . In between uses, clean the Glucose meter using a Oxivir [disinfectant] wipe, allow surface to remain wet for one minute to ensure kill time and allow to air dry. Place monitor back in Ziploc bag. - Observation on 09/10/24 at 11:56 a.m. showed a nurse (#1) performed a glucose check on Resident #70. The nurse failed to disinfect the glucose meter using a Oxivir wipe prior to placing it back in the Ziploc bag. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 2:44 p.m., an administrative nurse (#2) confirmed she expected staff to disinfect the glucose meter prior to placing back in the Ziploc bag. Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 2 of 9 sampled residents (Resident #3 and #25) and 2 supplemental residents (Resident #50 and #70) observed during cares/dressing change and glucose monitoring. Failure to follow infection control practices during resident cares related to hand hygiene, enhanced barrier precautions (EBP), and cleaning of a glucometer has the potential to spread infection throughout the facility. Findings include: HAND HYGIENE Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene occurred on 09/11/24. This policy, revised July 2024, stated, . Hand Hygiene Should Be Practiced: . Before applying and after removing gloves. Review of the facility policy titled Dressing: Clean occurred on 09/11/24. This policy, dated June 2024, stated, . [NAME] [put on] clean gloves and remove the dressing. Dispose of the gloves, perform hand hygiene and don a clean pair of gloves. Apply dressing to the area as ordered. - Observation on 09/09/24 at 4:30 p.m. showed two certified nurse aides (CNAs) (#5 and #6) assisted Resident #50 into bed and removed the soiled brief. The CNA (#5) performed perineal care, removed her gloves, adjusted the resident's clothing, arranged the resident's blankets, applied the resident's glasses, and adjusted the pillow. The CNA (#5) failed to perform hand hygiene after removing her gloves and prior to completing other tasks. - Observation on 09/10/24 at 1:35 p.m. showed a nurse (#1) changed Resident #25's dressing. The nurse removed the old dressing, removed her right glove, donned a clean glove, cleansed the wound with a perineal wipe, removed the right glove, donned a clean glove, and applied the clean dressing. The nurse (#1) failed to perform hand hygiene after removing soiled gloves and prior to donning clean gloves. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 3:15 p.m., an administrative nurse (#2) stated she expected staff to perform hand hygiene after glove removal when doing perineal care and a dressing change.
Jun 2024 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, review of facility policy, review of the facility's investigation reports, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to remain free from ment...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, review of facility policy, review of the facility's investigation reports, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to remain free from mental and/or physical abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) who had a rag placed in her mouth by staff to silence her. Failure to provide the services necessary to avoid mental anguish and emotional distress, resulted in an unsafe environment for Resident #2 and may result in fear, anxiety, and/or psychosocial harm. This citation is considered past non-compliance based on review of the corrective actions the facility implemented immediately after hearing the concerns reported by staff. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse occurred on 06/11/24. This policy, reviewed January 2024, stated: * Abuse is defined as . intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish, or deprivation of . services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being. * Physical abuse is defined as . controlling behavior through corporal punishment. * Mental abuse is defined as . harassment, and threats of punishment . Review of Resident #2's medical record occurred on 06/11/24. Diagnoses included dementia with agitation and anxiety disorder. The current care plan identified, . As per therapy assessments she [Resident #2] shows severe cognitive impairment, minimal awareness, confusion and disorientation, easily distracted, shows difficulty focusing attention, requires simple commands and remains minimally directable. She has some non-sensical speech along with tangential speech during conversations in which she shows disorganized thinking processes. She has the tendency to moan/groan, speak in a nonsensical manner, make humming sounds, and she seems to do these sounds in a repetitive manner and she will make these sounds in a varying degree of volume. This could reflect internal distress, racing thoughts and/or confusion and her behaviors may be her attempt at processing her thoughts or what is going on around her. During an interview on 06/11/24 at 4:20 p.m., four managerial staff members (#6, #7, #8 and #9) provided copies of the facility's Initial Facility Reported Incident Report and Final Investigation, stating, We immediately began investigating the incident and suspended the CNA (#5) pending the results of our investigation. Review of the facility's initial report, dated 06/07/24, identified, . Staff reported to Nurse Manager that CNA [certified nurse aide] has been observed being rough while providing cares to residents. Yelling, disrespecting and belittling residents. Staff reported CNA admitting to placing towel in resident's mouth to keep her quiet and this was also witnessed by another CNA. Review of the facility's final investigation, dated 06/10/24, included the following staffs' written testimonies, dated 06/07/24: * CNA (#2) wrote, . She [CNA (#5)] admitted to putting a rag in [Resident #2's] mouth so she'd be quiet . * CNA (#3) wrote, . She [CNA (#5)] has put a towel in her [Resident #2's] mouth to make her be quiet and she will put [Resident #2] in her wheelchair with it in her mouth still. During interviews on 06/11/24 at 3:33 p.m. and 5:43 p.m., a CNA (#3) stated, [Resident #2] is completely dependent. She is one to yell continuously, not yell loud. She'd [CNA (#5)] say, 'Shut up, be quiet,' only in her [Resident #2's] room, not in the hallway. One day, she grabbed a washcloth and put it in her mouth. I took it back out. It wasn't in there long. When I took the towel out, she rolled her eyes at me. During an interview on 06/12/24 at 12:54 p.m., a CNA (#2) stated, [Resident #2] always makes sounds. She can't help it. I was changing [Resident #2] with [CNA (#5)] last week. [CNA (#5)] admitted , 'If she [Resident #2] doesn't shut up, I put a rag in her mouth.' I was speechless. It was so shocking. I couldn't believe it. I told her, 'I tell her [Resident #2] the babies are sleeping, and she quits.' She ignored me. I talked to [CNA (#3)] later on and she just said she actually seen her do it, which is awful. As per facility policy, facility staff failed to: * Provide the services necessary to avoid mental anguish and emotional distress, * Utilize appropriate interventions when caring for residents exhibiting behaviors, * Identify abusive actions (i.e.: placing a washcloth in a resident's mouth to prevent them from speaking), Based on the following information, non-compliance at F600 is considered past non-compliance. The facility implemented corrective actions for the residents affected by the deficient practice and put measures in place to ensure the deficient practice does not reoccur by: * Immediately contacting the CNA (#5) accused of abuse to discuss the concerns reported by staff, * Placing the CNA (#5) on suspension until further notice, pending the results of the investigation, * Interviewing all of the staff members (#1, #2, #3, and #4) that reported concerns, * Reporting the concerns to the North Dakota Department of Health and Human Services, * Reporting the concerns to local Police Department, * Re-educating all staff members of the facility's reporting expectations on 06/07/24, * Re-educating all staff members of the facility's Abuse Policy starting on 06/11/24, * Completing audits pertaining to abuse/neglect. This surveyor determined a deficient practice existed on 06/07/24. The facility implemented corrective action and all staff education by 06/11/24.
Oct 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide treatment in accordance with the resident's plan of care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #49) with a his...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide treatment in accordance with the resident's plan of care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #49) with a history of a diabetic heel ulcer. Failure to apply heel protecting boots as ordered may result in the reoccurrence or worsening of heel ulcers. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included Type II Diabetes Mellitus and a history of diabetic heel ulcer (healed in August 2023). A physician's order, dated 08/22/23, stated, Prevalon boot [heel protecting soft boots] to BLE [bilateral lower extremities] when in bed. Observations on the morning of 10/10/23 and afternoon of 10/10/23 showed Resident #49 resting in bed without heel boots on her feet. Observation showed her heels rested on the mattress. During an observation on the afternoon of 10/11/23, a nurse (#2) entered Resident #49's room, gave the heel boots to two certified nurse aides (CNAs) (#3 and #4), and indicated Resident #49 needed to wear them in bed.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0849 (Tag F0849)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' records contained the hospice election form and the certification of a terminal illness...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' records contained the hospice election form and the certification of a terminal illness for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #53, #86, and #88) receiving hospice services. Failure to obtain these documents limits staff's ability to ensure coordination of care between the facility and the hospice. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hospice Care occurred on 10/11/23. This policy, dated January 2022, stated, . Documentation and maintenance of the hospice record: [name of facility] will maintain its own resident documentation system . physician orders and other relevant documentation in order to facilitate communication between the caregivers. - Review of Resident #53's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Resident #53 elected Hospice services on 08/11/23. The medical record lacked the Certificate of Terminal Illness completed by the Hospice provider. - Review of Resident #86's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The resident/resident's representative elected hospice and services began on 05/26/23. The medical record lacked the hospice election form and the physician's certification and recertification of the terminal illness. - Review of Resident #88's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The resident's representative elected hospice and services began on 08/15/23. The medical record lacked the hospice election form and the certification of terminal illness. During an interview on 10/11/23 at 11:15 a.m., an administrative nurse (#1) confirmed the medical record lacked the election form and the certification/recertification of terminal illness related to hospice.
Sept 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Findings include: DISINFECTING SHARED EQUIPMENT: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program occurred on 09/28/22. This policy, revised July 2022, stated, . All share...

Read full inspector narrative →
Findings include: DISINFECTING SHARED EQUIPMENT: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program occurred on 09/28/22. This policy, revised July 2022, stated, . All shared items and equipment will be cleaned in between uses using Disinfecting wipes/spray per facility protocol. - Observation on 09/26/22 at 4:50 p.m. showed two certified nurse assistants (CNAs) (#3 and #4) used a mechanical lift and transferred Resident #8 from the bed to the wheelchair. Upon completion of the transfer, the CNA (#3) removed the lift from the room and took the lift into another resident's room for use. The CNA (#3) failed to disinfect the mechanical lift after use and prior to entering another resident room. - Observation on 09/26/22 at 5:01 p.m. showed two CNAs (#2 and #3) used a mechanical lift and transferred Resident #48 from the bed to the wheelchair. Upon completion of the transfer, the CNA (#3) removed the lift from the room and placed it in a storage area by the nurse's station. The CNA (#3) failed to disinfect the mechanical lift after use. - Observation on 09/27/22 at 10:16 a.m. showed a CNA (#5) and a staff nurse (#6) used a mechanical lift and transferred Resident #17 from the chair to the bed. Upon completion of the transfer, the CNA removed the lift from the room and placed it in the hallway. The CNA (#8) failed to disinfect the mechanical lift after use. - Observation on 09/27/22 at 10:30 a.m. showed two CNAs (#7 and #8) used a mechanical lift and transferred Resident #17 from the bed to the wheelchair. Upon completion of the transfer, the CNA (#8) failed to disinfect the mechanical lift after use and prior to entering another resident room. - Observation on 09/27/22 at 1:19 p.m. showed two CNAs (#7 and #8) used a mechanical lift and transferred Resident #76 from the wheelchair to the bed. Upon completion of the transfer, the CNA (#7) removed the lift from the room and placed the lift in the hallway. The CNA (#7) failed to disinfect the mechanical lift after use. - Observation on 09/27/22 at 2:07 p.m. showed two CNAs (#2 and #3) used a stand lift and transferred Resident #8 from the wheelchair to the bed. Upon completion of the transfer, the CNA (#3) removed the lift from the room and placed it in a storage area by the nurse's station. The CNA (#3) failed to disinfect the mechanical lift after use. During an interview on 09/29/22 at 9:55 a.m., an administrative nurse (#1) stated it is her expectation that the staff sanitize the mechanical lifts as per policy. BREATHING TREATMENTS: Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control occurred on 09/28/22. This policy, revised September 2022, stated, . Avoid aerosol-generating procedures . if required, take the following precautions: Perform in private room, if possible, with door closed during and after procedure for 30 minutes. Staff wear a surgical mask and eye protection. Observation on 09/26/22 at 1:19 p.m. showed Resident #71's room door open and the resident seated in a recliner chair receiving a breathing treatment. The resident's door lacked signage for aerosol precautions. During an interview on 09/26/22 at 2:03 p.m., Resident #71 reported the staff bring the medication for the nebulizer machine to the room, and she completes the breathing treatment. Resident #71 stated, I have COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease] and get four treatments a day. Observation on 09/27/22 at 8:42 a.m. showed signage on Resident #71's door. The sign indicated, STOP ATTENTION: Nebulizers are given in this room. MUST wear mask and eye protection in this room during and for 30 MINUTES after administration. Door MUST remain closed during this time. Observation on 09/27/22 at 9:34 a.m. showed a medication assistant (MA) (#9) in Resident #71's room administering a breathing treatment. The MA failed to wear eye protection and close the door while interacting with the resident. At 9:35 a.m., the MA exited the resident's room, the door remained open, and the breathing treatment continued. During an interview on 09/29/22 at 9:50 a.m., an administrative nurse (#1) stated she expected staff to wear eye protection and keep the room door closed during and after a breathing treatment. Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to follow standards of infection prevention and control for 3 of 20 sampled residents (Resident #17 #48, and #76) and 2 supplemental residents (Resident #8 and #71). Failure to follow infection control standards related to disinfecting equipment and performing aerosol-generating procedures has the potential to transmit infections to other residents, staff, and visitors.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in North Dakota.
  • • 34% turnover. Below North Dakota's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 7 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Smp Health - Ave Maria's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Smp Health - Ave Maria Staffed?

CMS rates SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 34%, compared to the North Dakota average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Smp Health - Ave Maria?

State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 6 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Smp Health - Ave Maria?

SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by SMP HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 100 certified beds and approximately 89 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in JAMESTOWN, North Dakota.

How Does Smp Health - Ave Maria Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (34%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Smp Health - Ave Maria?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Smp Health - Ave Maria Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Smp Health - Ave Maria Stick Around?

SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA has a staff turnover rate of 34%, which is about average for North Dakota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Smp Health - Ave Maria Ever Fined?

SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA has been fined $6,788 across 1 penalty action. This is below the North Dakota average of $33,147. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Smp Health - Ave Maria on Any Federal Watch List?

SMP HEALTH - AVE MARIA is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.