HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC

95 HILL TOP DR, KILLDEER, ND 58640 (701) 764-5682
Non profit - Corporation 60 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#50 of 72 in ND
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Hill Top Home of Comfort Inc has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about its care quality. Ranking #50 out of 72 facilities in North Dakota places it in the bottom half, while being the only option in Dunn County means there are no local alternatives that are better. The facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 1 in 2023 to 5 in 2024, including critical incidents of resident-to-resident abuse that were not adequately reported or investigated, placing residents at risk for emotional and physical harm. While staffing is a strong point with a 5-star rating and a low turnover rate of 26%, the facility faces serious issues with $198,960 in fines, which is higher than 97% of North Dakota facilities. Overall, the combination of excellent staffing and troubling abuse incidents creates a concerning picture for families considering this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In North Dakota
#50/72
Bottom 31%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
1 → 5 violations
Staff Stability
✓ Good
26% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 22 points below North Dakota's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Penalties
○ Average
$198,960 in fines. Higher than 66% of North Dakota facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 52 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for North Dakota. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
○ Average
8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 1 issues
2024: 5 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Low Staff Turnover (26%) · Staff stability means consistent care
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover is low (26%)

    22 points below North Dakota average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below North Dakota average (3.1)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Federal Fines: $198,960

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Jul 2024 5 deficiencies 3 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from resident to resident abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #48), 1 supplemental resident (Resident #34), and 1 of 2 closed records (Resident #210). Failure to identify physical or sexual abuse placed residents at risk for possible mental and emotional distress, and/or physical injury. During the on-site recertification survey, the team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) and determined an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 08/16/23. The IJ was identified when nurse's notes in Resident #34's and #210's medical records, dated 08/16/23, identified the residents had engaged in kissing and touching. A second nurse's note in Resident #48's medical record, dated 10/26/23, identified he led a female resident (Resident #34) into his room and barricaded the door with a chair. This finding placed residents in immediate danger due to the potential for mental and emotional distress and/or physical injury. *07/11/24 at 10:05 a.m. The survey team notified the administrator of the IJ situation, provided the IJ template, and requested a plan for removal of the immediate jeopardy. *07/12/24 at 1:37 p.m. The survey team reviewed and accepted the facility's removal plan for the IJ. The removal plan contained the following: *Conducted interviews with Resident #34 and Resident #48 in regards to the resident to resident altercations. *Reviewed care plans for Resident #34 and Resident #48 to ensure resident behaviors were identified and interventions implemented. *Implemented behavior logs to be filled out by nurses to identify potential behaviors/abuse situations. *Education provided to all staff on 07/11/24 by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Social Services Designee (SSD). Staff not available for education will complete education prior to their next scheduled shift. Education specifically focused on how to identify what constitutes resident to resident abuse or the potential of such abuse and the importance of implementing procedures to ensure the safety of the resident involved as well as the potential for all residents in the facility. *Implemented monitoring of the behavior logs by the SSD to ensure all behaviors are addressed and assessed for potential abuse. *07/16/24 at 11:40 a.m. The survey team verified the implementation of the removal plan as of 07/11/24 and the IJ removal. The deficient practice remained at an E scope and severity following the removal of the immediate jeopardy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation occurred on 06/26/24. This policy, dated October 2019, stated, . to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse . 'Abuse' means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse . 'Willful' means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. 'Sexual Abuse' is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. 'Physical Abuse' includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. The components of the facility abuse prohibition plan are . Screening . Prospective residents will be screened . An assessment of the individual's functional and mood/behavioral status, medical acuity, and special needs will be reviewed prior to admission.The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse . that achieves: . Establishing a safe environment that supports, to the extent possible, a resident's consensual sexual relationship and by establishing policies and protocols for preventing sexual abuse, such as the [sic] identify when, how, and by whom determinations of capacity to consent to a sexual contact will be made and where this documentation will be recorded . Identifying, correcting and intervening in situations in which abuse . is more likely to occur . The identification, ongoing assessment, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict . The facility will have [sic] assist staff in identifying the different types of abuse - mental/verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse . An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse . or reports of abuse . occur . The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm during and after the investigation. Examples include but are not limited to: . increased supervision of the alleged victim and residents . Room or staffing changes, if necessary, to protect the resident(s) from the alleged perpetrator . - Review of Resident #34's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and post traumatic stress disorder. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition. The care plan stated, . A history of trauma affects me negatively. I had an abusive husband and will talk about at times. Triggers that have the potential to re-traumatize me include: Sound . Smell . Touch . Once I have experienced a trigger, I may display these signs/symptoms: . Anxiety/Edginess . Overwhelming fear . Anger/Irritability . Changes in mood state . Confusion/Disorientation . The frequency or severity of my trauma-related signs and symptoms will not increase through next review. The care plan failed to address the resident's wishes for engaging in physical contact with other residents. Nursing progress notes for Resident #34 included the following: * 08/16/23 at 10:57 a.m., [Resident #34] was found in the room of [Resident #210]. [Resident #34] was discovered halfway undressed, pants and brief were on the floor, socks thrown on opposite sides of the room, and was engaged in physical contact with [Resident #210]. Both were kissing/touching, [Resident #210] was in the process of pulling down his pants when staff walked in. Both residents were assisted with putting their clothes back on and [Resident #34] was guided out of the room. * 08/16/23 at 2:15 p.m., Son . was called and notified of situation that occurred earlier with another male resident. Son appreciative of call and indicated his mother has always been drawn to companionship. He expressed no concern about the situation as long as resident is showing happiness . - Review of Resident #210's medical record occurred on all days of survey, and included a diagnoses of dementia. An admission MDS, dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition. The care plan stated, I have the following behavior problem . physically abusive . verbally abusive . wandering . sexually inappropriate . The care plan failed to address the resident's wishes for engaging in physical contact with other residents. Nursing progress notes for Resident #210 included the following: * 08/15/23 at 5:01 p.m., Resident seen today by [physician name] on routine rounds for admit appointment. Assessment completed, chart and VS [vital signs] reviewed. Reported occasional behaviors/outbursts. Reported resident will be seen . on psych rounds next Wednesday. [Physician name] gave orders to increase Seroquel [antipsychotic medication] to 75 mg [milligrams] . BID [two times daily]. Orders faxed to pharmacy. * 08/16/23 at 10:56 a.m., [Resident #34] was found in the room of [Resident #210]. [Resident #34] was discovered halfway undressed, pants and brief were on the floor, socks thrown on opposite sides of the room, and was engaged in physical contact with [Resident #210]. Both were kissing/touching, [Resident #210] was in the process of pulling down his pants when staff walked in. Both residents were assisted with putting their clothes back on and [Resident #34] was guided out of the room. During an interview on 06/26/24 at 12:45 p.m., two administrative nurses (#1 and #2) confirmed they did not identify the actions between Resident #34 and Resident #210 as sexual abuse. - Review of Resident #48's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety. A discharge MDS, dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition. Nursing progress notes for Resident #48 included the following: * 10/26/23 at 2:45 p.m., Resident was seen leading another female resident [Resident #34] . into his room. Redirection was unsuccessful . Resident then started to be aggressive and screaming.while walking towards this writer with a fist closed. Resident then brought the female resident [Resident #34] to his room, closed the door, and barricaded it using another chair. This writer tried to knock on the door and asked if he could let the female resident [Resident #34] out as she looks frantic. Resident started yelling and screaming . DON was told of the incident on the unit and came right away. * 10/26/23 at 4:00 p.m., . When entered unit [Resident #48] had barricaded his room door with a chair with another female resident in the room. began to verbally scream and yell at staff outside of the room in the hallway. Administrator of facility was able to get door open a small amount and could see female resident sitting on [Resident #48's] bed . After many attempts [Resident #48] continued to refuse to open the door . Administrator pushed door open. [Resident #48] stepping backwards from door fell onto right knee and buttock. He quickly stood up and refused to have anyone enter his room and would not allow to have female resident leave the room. staff assisted female resident away from [Resident #48's] room. [Resident #48] began to follow staff and female resident down the hallway screaming and swung at face of staff member. He is placing residents. at risk to be hurt. [Resident #48's] wife indicated.has a hx [history] of getting very upset and aggressive. Call placed to 911 with police presence to send [Resident #48] into ER [emergency room] for evaluation. During interviews on 06/26/24 at 9:08 a.m. and 9:20 a.m., two administrative staff members (#2 and #3) confirmed they did not identify the actions of Resident #48 towards Resident #34 as physical abuse. The facility failed to have a system and policy and procedures in place for assessing all residents' needs, desires, and usual preferences to determine how to care plan according to the assessment.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to report potential abuse to the Sta...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to report potential abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #48), 1 supplemental resident (Resident #34), and 1 of 2 closed records (Resident #210). Failure to report potential abuse between cognitively impaired residents to the SSA, placed Resident #34, #48, #210, and other residents at risk for possible abuse and/or injury. During the on-site recertification survey, the team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) and determined an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 08/16/23. The IJ resulted from facility staff failing to report physical and sexual abuse between Resident #34, Resident #48, and Resident #210 to the SSA. These findings placed residents in immediate danger due to the potential for mental and emotional distress and or/physical injury. *07/11/24 at 10:05 a.m. The survey team notified the administrator and director of nursing of the IJ situation, provided the IJ template, and requested a plan for removal of the immediate jeopardy. *07/12/24 at 1:37 p.m. The survey team reviewed and accepted the facility's removal plan for the IJ. The removal plan contained the following: *Conducted interviews with Resident #34 and Resident #48 in regards to the resident to resident altercations. *Reviewed care plans for Resident #34 and Resident #48 to ensure resident behaviors were identified and interventions implemented. *Implemented behavior logs to be filled out by nurses to identify potential behaviors/abuse situations. *Education provided to all staff on 07/11/24 by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Social Service Designee (SSD). Staff not available for education will complete education prior to their next scheduled shift. Education specifically focused on identifying abuse or potential for abuse, how and who to report abuse to, including administration, physician's, resident representatives and the SSA, and the timeframes for reporting allegations of abuse. *Implemented monitoring of the behavior logs by the SSD to ensure all behaviors are addressed and assessed for potential abuse. *07/16/24 at 11:40 a.m. The survey team verified the implementation of the removal plan as of 07/11/24 and the IJ removal. The deficient practice remained at an E scope and severity following the removal of the immediate jeopardy. Findings include: Review of a policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation occurred on 06/26/24. This policy, dated October 2019, stated, . Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies . within specified timeframes . not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the event that cause allegation involve abuse . or . Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause allegation do not involve abuse and do no result in serious bodily injury. - Review of Resident #34's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included dementia, post-traumatic stress disorder and anxiety. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition. Nursing progress notes for Resident #34 included the following: * 08/16/23 at 10:57 a.m., [Resident #34] was found in the room of [Resident #210]. [Resident #34] was discovered halfway undressed, pants and brief were on the floor, socks thrown on opposite sides of the room, and was engaged in physical contact with [Resident #210]. Both were kissing/touching, [Resident #210] was in the process of pulling down his pants when staff walked in. Both residents were assisted with putting their clothes back on and [Resident #34] was guided out of the room. * 08/16/23 at 2:15 p.m., Son . was called and notified of situation that occurred earlier with another male resident. Son appreciative of call and indicated his mother has always been drawn to companionship. He expressed no concern about the situation as long as resident is showing happiness . - Review of Resident #210's medical record occurred on all days of survey, and included a diagnosis of dementia. An admission MDS, dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition. Nursing progress notes for Resident #210 included the following: * 08/15/23 at 5:01 p.m., Resident seen today by [physician name] on routine rounds for admit appointment. Assessment completed, chart and VS [vital signs] reviewed. Reported occasional behaviors/outbursts. Reported resident will be seen . on psych rounds next Wednesday. [Physician name] gave orders to increase Seroquel [antipsychotic medication] to 75 mg [milligrams] . BID [two times daily]. Orders faxed to pharmacy. * 08/16/23 at 10:56 a.m., [Resident #34] was found in the room of [Resident #210]. [Resident #34] was discovered halfway undressed, pants and brief were on the floor, socks thrown on opposite sides of the room, and was engaged in physical contact with [Resident #210]. Both were kissing/touching, [Resident #210] was in the process of pulling down his pants when staff walked in. Both residents were assisted with putting their clothes back on and [Resident #34] was guided out of the room. The record lacked evidence the facility reported the above incident to the SSA as possible abuse. During an interview on 06/26/24 at 12:45 p.m., two administrative nurses (#1 and #2) confirmed the facility failed to report the interaction between Resident #34 and Resident #210 to the SSA. - Review of Resident #48's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety. A discharge MDS, dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition. Nursing progress notes for Resident #48 included the following: * 10/26/23 at 2:45 p.m., Resident was seen leading another female resident [Resident #34]. into his room. Redirection was unsuccessful . Resident then started to be aggressive and screaming.while walking towards this writer with a fist closed. Resident then brought the female resident [Resident #34] to his room, closed the door, and barricaded it using another chair. This writer tried to knock on the door and asked if he could let the female resident [Resident #34] out as she looks frantic. Resident started yelling and screaming . DON was told of the incident on the unit and came right away. * 10/26/23 at 4:00 p.m., . When entered unit [Resident #48] had barricaded his room door with a chair with another female resident in the room. began to verbally scream and yell at staff outside of the room in the hallway. Administrator of facility was able to get door open a small amount and could see female resident sitting on [Resident #48's] bed . After many attempts [Resident #48] continued to refuse to open the door . Administrator pushed door open. [Resident #48] stepping backwards from door fell onto right knee and buttock. He quickly stood up and refused to have anyone enter his room and would not allow to have female resident leave the room. staff assisted female resident away from [Resident #48's] room. [Resident #48] began to follow staff and female resident down the hallway screaming and swung at face of staff member. He is placing residents. at risk to be hurt. [Resident #48's] wife indicated.has a hx [history] of getting very upset and aggressive. Call placed to 911 with police presence to send [Resident #48] into ER [emergency room] for evaluation. The record lacked evidence the facility reported the above incident to the SSA as possible abuse. During interviews on 06/26/24 at 9:08 a.m. and 9:20 a.m., two administrative staff members (#2 and #3) confirmed the facility failed to report the interaction between Resident #34 and Resident #48 to the SSA.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to investigate resident to resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interviews, the facility failed to investigate resident to resident abuse for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #48), 1 supplemental resident (Resident #34), and 1 of 2 closed records (Resident #210). Failure to investigate alleged violations of resident to resident abuse, ensure residents were protected during each investigation, and implement corrective actions/evaluate their effectiveness following each investigation, placed Resident #34, #48, #210, and other residents at risk for possible mental and emotional distress and/or physical injury. During the on-site recertification survey, the team consulted with the State Survey Agency (SSA) and determined an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation existed on 08/16/23. The IJ resulted from facility staff failing to investigate physical and sexual abuse for resident to resident altercations between Resident #34, Resident #48, and Resident #210. The IJ was identified when nurse's notes in Resident #34's and #210's medical record, dated 08/16/23, identified the residents had engaged in kissing and touching. A second nurse's note in Resident #48's medical record, dated 10/26/23, identified he led a female resident (Resident #34) into his room and barricaded the door with a chair. Failure to investigate incidents of potential abuse may result in unwanted physical and/or sexual contact and my cause residents mental and emotional distress and/or physical injury. *07/11/24 at 10:05 a.m. The survey team notified the administrator and director of nursing of the IJ situation, provided the IJ template, and requested a plan for removal of the immediate jeopardy. *07/12/24 at 1:37 p.m. The survey team reviewed and accepted the facility's removal plan for the IJ. The removal plan contained the following: *Conducted interviews with Resident #34 and Resident #48 in regards to the resident to resident altercations. *Reviewed care plans for Resident #34 and Resident #48 to ensure resident behaviors were identified and interventions implemented. *Implemented behavior logs to be filled out by licensed nurses to identify potential behaviors/abuse situations. *Education provided to all staff on 07/11/24 by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Social Worker Designee (SSD). Staff not available for education will complete education prior to their next scheduled shift. Education specifically focused on identifying abuse or potential abuse, and conducting and documenting an investigation in order to ensure resident safety and appropriate interventions are put in place. *Implemented monitoring of the behavior logs by the SSD to ensure all behaviors are addressed and assessed for potential abuse. *07/16/24 at 11:40 a.m. The survey team verified the implementation of the removal plan as of 07/11/24 and the IJ removal. The deficient practice remained at an E scope and severity following the removal of the immediate jeopardy. Findings include: Review of a policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation occurred on 06/26/24. This policy, dated October 2019, stated, . An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse . occur. Written procedures for investigations include . Investigating different types of alleged violations . Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations . Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and cause, and . Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm during and after the investigation. Examples include but are not limited to: . Examining the alleged victim for any sign of injury, including a physical examination or psychosocial assessment if needed . Increased supervision of the alleged victim and residents . - Review of Resident #34's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included dementia. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition. Nursing progress notes for Resident #34 included the following: * 08/16/23 at 10:57 a.m., [Resident #34] was found in the room of [Resident #210]. [Resident #34] was discovered halfway undressed, pants and brief were on the floor, socks thrown on opposite sides of the room, and was engaged in physical contact with [Resident #210]. Both were kissing/touching, [Resident #210] was in the process of pulling down his pants when staff walked in. Both residents were assisted with putting their clothes back on and [Resident #34] was guided out of the room. * 08/16/23 at 2:15 p.m., Son . was called and notified of situation that occurred earlier with another male resident. Son appreciative of call and indicated his mother has always been drawn to companionship. He expressed no concern about the situation as long as resident is showing happiness . - Review of Resident #210's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included dementia. An admission MDS, dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition. Nursing progress notes for Resident #210 included the following: * 08/15/23 at 5:01 p.m., Resident seen today by [physician name] on routine rounds for admit appointment. Assessment completed, chart and VS [vital signs] reviewed. Reported occasional behaviors/outbursts. Reported resident will be seen . on psych rounds next Wednesday. [Physician name] gave orders to increase Seroquel [antipsychotic medication] to 75 mg [milligrams] . BID [two times daily]. Orders faxed to pharmacy. * 08/16/23 at 10:56 a.m., [Resident #34] was found in the room of [Resident #210]. [Resident #34] was discovered halfway undressed, pants and brief were on the floor, socks thrown on opposite sides of the room, and was engaged in physical contact with [Resident #210]. Both were kissing/touching, [Resident #210] was in the process of pulling down his pants when staff walked in. Both residents were assisted with putting their clothes back on and [Resident #34] was guided out of the room. The facility lacked evidence they started and/or completed an investigation into the incident between Resident #34 and #210. During an interview on 06/26/24 at 12:45 p.m., two administrative nurses (#1 and #2) confirmed the facility failed to complete and document an investigation of the interaction between Resident #34 and Resident #210. - Review of Resident #48's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnoses included dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety. A discharge MDS, dated [DATE], identified moderately impaired cognition. Nursing progress notes for Resident #48 included the following: * 10/26/23 at 2:45 p.m., Resident was seen leading another female resident [Resident #34]. into his room. Redirection was unsuccessful . Resident then started to be aggressive and screaming.while walking towards this writer with a fist closed. Resident then brought the female resident [Resident #34] to his room, closed the door, and barricaded it using another chair. This writer tried to knock on the door and asked if he could let the female resident [Resident #34] out as she looks frantic. Resident started yelling and screaming . DON was told of the incident on the unit and came right away. * 10/26/23 at 4:00 p.m., . When entered unit [Resident #48] had barricaded his room door with a chair with another female resident in the room. began to verbally scream and yell at staff outside of the room in the hallway. Administrator of facility was able to get door open a small amount and could see female resident sitting on [Resident #48's] bed . After many attempts [Resident #48] continued to refuse to open the door . Administrator pushed door open. [Resident #48] stepping backwards from door fell onto right knee and buttock. He quickly stood up and refused to have anyone enter his room and would not allow to have female resident leave the room. staff assisted female resident away from [Resident #48's] room. [Resident #48] began to follow staff and female resident down the hallway screaming and swung at face of staff member. He is placing residents. at risk to be hurt. [Resident #48's] wife indicated . has a hx [history] of getting very upset and aggressive. Call placed to 911 with police presence to send [Resident #48] into ER [emergency room] for evaluation. The facility lacked evidence they started and/or completed an investigation into the incident between Resident #34 and #48. During interviews on 06/26/24 at 9:08 a.m. and 9:20 a.m., two administrative staff members (#2 and #3) confirmed the facility failed to document an investigation of the interaction between Resident #34 and Resident #48.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1....

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1.18.11), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate coding of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #20 and #51). Failure to accurately complete the MDS does not allow each resident's assessment to reflect their current status/needs and may affect the accurate development of a comprehensive care plan and the care provided to the residents. Findings include: SECTION N: MEDICATIONS The Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, revised October 2023, pages N-6 to N-8 stated, . N0415: High-Risk Drug Classes: Use and Indication . Coding Instructions . N0415J1 Hypoglycemic (including insulin): Check if a hypoglycemic medication was taken by the resident any time during the observation period. Review of Resident #51's medical record occurred on all days of survey. A physician's order, dated 01/24/24, stated, Metformin 500mg [milligrams] daily with breakfast. The quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed staff failed to identify Resident #51 received a hypoglycemic medication. During an interview on the afternoon of 06/25/24, an administrative nurse (#1) confirmed staff failed to document a hypoglycemic medication on the MDS. SECTION O: SPECIAL TREATMENTS, PROCEDURES, AND PROGRAMS The Long-Term Care Facility RAI User's Manual, revised October 2023, pages O-3 an O-4 stated, . Steps for Assessment . Review the resident's medical record to determine whether or not the resident received or performed any of the treatments, procedures, or programs within the assessment period . O0110C1, Oxygen therapy . Code continuous or intermittent oxygen administered . Review of Resident #20's medical record occurred on all days of survey. The medication administration record (MAR) showed Resident #20 received two liters of oxygen on all shifts daily from 03/25/24 - 04/08/24. A quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], lacked documentation of Resident #20's continuous oxygen use. During an interview on the afternoon of 06/25/24, an administrative nurse (#1) confirmed staff failed to document Resident #20's oxygen use on the MDS.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise care plans for 2 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #48 and #56). Failure to review and revise the care plan limited staff's ability to communicate needs, ensure continuity of care, and may negatively impact the care provided to residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans occurred on 06/26/24. This policy, revised 10/2021, stated, .care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment and PRN [as needed] with changes. - Review of Resident #48's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, and dementia with psychotic disturbance. Review of progress notes from October 2023 to May 2024 identified Resident #48 exhibited verbal and physical behaviors on the following dates: *10/20/2023 at 8:48 p.m. stated, Incident. Staff reported resident initiated an argument with [another resident]. *10/26/23 at 2:45 p.m. stated, Resident was seen leading another female resident. into his room. Resident then started to be aggressive and screaming. while walking towards this writer with a fist closed. Resident then brought female resident to his rooms, closed the door, and barricaded it using another chair. Resident started yelling and screaming. *10/26/23 at 4:00 p.m. stated, .began to verbally scream and yell at staff outside of the room in the hallway. very upset swung to punch administrator of facility.began to follow staff and female resident down the hallway screaming and swung at face of staff member. *12/17/23 at 6:14 p.m. stated, Behavior. [another resident's spouse] was standing in hallway by her husband's closed room. This resident got close to her and shook his fist in her face without being instigated. *05/10/24 at 10:00 p.m. stated, Behavior Charting.started following around the 2 CNAs and would square up and/or swing fists at them but did not make contact. *05/13/24 at 7:06 p.m. stated, . Staff observed [Resident #48] yelling, screaming, and pushing against the wall. A discharge MDS, dated [DATE], identified physical and verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others occurred 1 to 3 days. The current care plan stated, .Behavioral symptoms. I am at risk for elopement as evidenced by: my exit seaking [sic] and wandering. The care plan failed to identify behavioral symptoms related to verbal and physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others. -Review of Resident #56's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and wheezing. A physician's order, dated 04/18/24, stated, Oxygen per NC [nasal cannula] to maintain O2 [oxygen] sat >90% [saturation greater than 90 percent]. In an interview on 06/24/24 at 12:36 p.m., Resident #56 confirmed she should have oxygen on continuously and placed nasal cannula on. The facility failed to update Resident #56's care plan regarding oxygen use. During an interview on 06/25/24 at 3:40 p.m., an administrative staff member (#1) confirmed the facility failed to update Resident 56's care plan related to oxygen use and resident's refusal to wear at times.
Jul 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0801 (Tag F0801)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 nutrition and food services supervisor (#1) obtained the proper qualifications to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. F...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 nutrition and food services supervisor (#1) obtained the proper qualifications to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. Failure to ensure staff have the qualifications to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services has the potential to result in foodborne illness to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: During an interview on 07/26/23 at 3:31 p.m., the nutrition and food services supervisor (#1) and an administrative staff member (#2) confirmed the necessary courses required for the director of food and nutrition services are not completed. The facility failed to ensure the supervisor (#1) completed the required education for a certified dietary manager, certified food service manager, or a national certification for food service management and safety from a national certifying body.
Jun 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment on 3 of 4 units (Meadow Lane, Northern, and Spring). Failure to maintain a safe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment on 3 of 4 units (Meadow Lane, Northern, and Spring). Failure to maintain a safe, clean, and sanitary environment does not provide a comfortable/homelike environment and places residents at risk for injury. Findings include: Observations of the environment on all days of the survey showed the following: - Meadow Lane Rooms 1101 - personal fan soiled with dust and heat register with broken piece hanging off the register 1103 - wall near the bed with scuffed/scraped areas 1104 - wall near the bed with scuffed/scraped areas 1106 - wall in the bathroom with scuffed/scraped areas 1109 - wall in the bathroom with two areas of missing paint 1110 - wall near the bed with scuffed/scraped areas and an open cable TV outlet box with exposed cable cords 1111 - two open cable TV outlet boxes with exposed cable cords 1112 - an open cable TV outlet box with exposed cable cords - Northern Rooms 1201 - wall behind the bed scuffed/scraped 1202 - wall behind the bed scuffed and scraped 1205 - broken outlet on the wall and some of the heat register pieces broken 1206 - wall behind the bed scuffed/scraped, holes in wall where previous items hung, open cable TV box with exposed cable cords, heat register smashed in at the end, and wall under window with dark dirty spots 1211 - wall behind the bed scuffed/scraped. - Spring Rooms 1403 - scratches in the paint on 3 of the walls. 1404 - scrapes and gouges in the wall behind the bed and recliner, and patched unpainted areas under the TV 1405 - large patched, unpainted area by the bathroom 1406 - large gouges in the wall by the video game table 1407 - gouges behind the head of bed 1408 - patched unpainted area behind the bathroom door 1409 - multiple scrapes on the wall and gouges beneath the TV mount A wall at the end of Spring unit's hallway with gouged, scuffed/scraped areas, a wooden box in the hallway with computer hookup wires from old electronic health system During an environmental tour on 06/23/22 at 8:20 a.m., an administrative staff (#1) stated he expected nursing staff to submit work orders and maintenance staff to cover the cable TV outlets.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

TRANSCRIBING ORDERS 2. Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sample resident (Resident #37...

Read full inspector narrative →
TRANSCRIBING ORDERS 2. Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sample resident (Resident #37) reviewed with a dietary order change. Failure to transcribe Resident #37's dietary order when received placed the resident at risk for adverse consequences. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Orders occurred on 06/23/22. This policy, revised 09/20/21, stated, .Verbal orders should be received only by licensed nurses, and confirmed in writing by the physician, on the next visit to the facility. All medication orders are documented into Matrix Care [electronic health record system] under current orders. Review of Resident #37's medical record occurred all days of survey. The record showed a physician's order, dated 11/18/21, for a regular diet. A progress note, dated 12/09/21, stated, Received telephone order from speech therapist stating, NDD3 [National Dysphagia Diet] diet with all foods cut into small pieces, gravy/sauce added to meat, thin liquids ok via cup/straw, line of sight supervision, [sit at] 90 degree for all meals. The resident's current care plan identified a mechanically altered NDD3 diet matching the progress note documented on 12/09/21. During an interview on 06/23/22 at 8:39 a.m., two administrative nurses (#2 and #3) confirmed staff failed to transcribe Resident #37's dietary order into the medical record. Failure to transcribe the order at the time received has the potential for a negative consequence to the resident. INSULIN ADMINISTRATION 1. Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #40) and two supplemental residents (Residents #18 and #36) observed receiving insulin. Failure to administer insulin as instructed may result in residents receiving an inaccurate dose of insulin. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Insulin Pen occurred on 06/22/22. This policy, revised 10/2021, stated, . Injecting the insulin: . While still pressing the plunger, keep the needle in the skin for up to 6-10 seconds and then remove the needle from the skin. Observation of insulin administration showed the following: * 06/22/22 at 9:30 a.m., a staff nurse (#4) administered 3 units of insulin via pen to Resident #18. After injecting the insulin, the staff nurse (#4) failed to keep the needle in the skin for 6-10 seconds. * 06/22/22 at 11:27 a.m., a staff nurse (#4) administered 2 units of insulin via pen to Resident #40. After injecting the insulin, the staff nurse (#4) failed to keep the needle in the skin for 6-10 seconds. * 06/22/22 at 11:37 a.m., a staff nurse (#4) administered 10 units of insulin via pen to Resident #36. After injecting the insulin, the staff nurse (#4) failed to keep the needle in the skin for 6-10 seconds. During an interview on 06/23/22 at 9:07 a.m., two administrative nurses (#2 and #3) confirmed they expected staff to follow the facility policy regarding insulin administration.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 26% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 22 points below North Dakota's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, $198,960 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 8 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $198,960 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in North Dakota. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc Staffed?

CMS rates HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 26%, compared to the North Dakota average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc?

State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC during 2022 to 2024. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 5 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc?

HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 59 residents (about 98% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in KILLDEER, North Dakota.

How Does Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (26%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.

Is Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc Stick Around?

Staff at HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 26%, the facility is 20 percentage points below the North Dakota average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 8%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.

Was Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc Ever Fined?

HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC has been fined $198,960 across 1 penalty action. This is 5.7x the North Dakota average of $35,068. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Hill Top Home Of Comfort Inc on Any Federal Watch List?

HILL TOP HOME OF COMFORT INC is currently an SFF Candidate, meaning CMS has identified it as potentially qualifying for the Special Focus Facility watch list. SFF Candidates have a history of serious deficiencies but haven't yet reached the threshold for full SFF designation. The facility is being monitored more closely — if problems continue, it may be added to the official watch list. Families should ask what the facility is doing to address the issues that led to this status.