ST ROSE CARE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
St. Rose Care Center has a Trust Grade of B, which means it is a good choice for families looking for nursing home care. It ranks #30 out of 72 facilities in North Dakota, placing it in the top half, and it is the only facility in La Moure County. The facility is improving, with the number of issues decreasing from 4 in 2024 to 3 in 2025. Staffing is a concern, with a 79% turnover rate, significantly higher than the state average of 48%. While there have been no fines reported, specific concerns include a lack of a full-time dietary manager, which could lead to food safety issues, and unmaintained heating vents that pose a fall risk for residents.
- Trust Score
- B
- In North Dakota
- #30/72
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 79% turnover. Very high, 31 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most North Dakota facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 50 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for North Dakota. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
33pts above North Dakota avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
31 points above North Dakota average of 48%
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained, enhanced, and respected the resident's dignity and individuality f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate medication labeling for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #20) receiving med...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #28) and 1 supp...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify the resident representative for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #16) reviewed for elopement. Fai...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (Version 1....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide oral hygiene for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #15) dependent on staff for assi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on review of dietary department manager employment histories and staff interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time qualified dietary manager to carry out the functions of food and nutri...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and resident, family, and staff interview, the facility failed t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of Medicare Beneficiary Notices and staff interview, the facility failed to submit a demand bill request for 1 of 3 supplemental residents (Resident #5) reviewed for termination of Med...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** THIS IS A REPEAT DEFICIENCY FROM THE SURVEY COMPLETED 09/20/21
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #26) in the Peace Garden Suite. Failure to properly cover and maintain...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of the North Dakota Plumbing Code, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an air gap for 1 of 1 ice machine observed used for needs of the facility. Failure t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most North Dakota facilities.
- • 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • 79% turnover. Very high, 31 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
About This Facility
What is St Rose's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ST ROSE CARE CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is St Rose Staffed?
CMS rates ST ROSE CARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 79%, which is 33 percentage points above the North Dakota average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at St Rose?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at ST ROSE CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 12 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates St Rose?
ST ROSE CARE CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by BENEDICTINE HEALTH SYSTEM, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 36 certified beds and approximately 30 residents (about 83% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LAMOURE, North Dakota.
How Does St Rose Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, ST ROSE CARE CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (79%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting St Rose?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is St Rose Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ST ROSE CARE CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at St Rose Stick Around?
Staff turnover at ST ROSE CARE CENTER is high. At 79%, the facility is 33 percentage points above the North Dakota average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was St Rose Ever Fined?
ST ROSE CARE CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is St Rose on Any Federal Watch List?
ST ROSE CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.