SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
SMP Health - St. Raphael has a Trust Grade of C+, which means it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #29 out of 72 nursing homes in North Dakota, placing it in the top half of facilities in the state, and it is the only option in Barnes County, indicating limited local competition. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from five in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, with a 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 32%, which is significantly lower than the state average of 48%. However, there is concerning RN coverage, as the facility has less RN support than 86% of North Dakota facilities. There are significant weaknesses to consider. For instance, a serious incident occurred where a resident suffered severe pain from an untreated hip fracture after a fall, indicating a failure to monitor and manage pain effectively. Another serious finding involved a resident sustaining a facial injury due to staff abuse, highlighting a lack of protection against neglect and harm. Additionally, the facility faced concerns over food safety, as expired food was not discarded, which could affect residents' health. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and a positive trend in issues, families should weigh these against the serious incidents reported.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In North Dakota
- #29/72
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 32% turnover. Near North Dakota's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $8,190 in fines. Lower than most North Dakota facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for North Dakota. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (32%)
16 points below North Dakota average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
14pts below North Dakota avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control and prevention for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #16 and #73) ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of temperature logs, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow the grievance process for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #99 and #133) with concerns regarding treatment fro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to transcribe a treatment order accurately for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #133) observed during a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of medications in 1 of 2 medication carts (Union Square) observed. Failure t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
ENHANCED BARRIER PRECAUTIONS:
- Review of Resident #28's medical record occurred on all days of survey. Physician's orders included a dressing change to a surgical wound twice daily. The care plan sta...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on information provided by the complainant, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain the highest pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, review of facility policy, and staff interview the facility failed to maintain a comfortable temperature level for 1 of 6 units (Valley View). Failure to maintain comfortable ro...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 4 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #12, #13, #15, and #42) ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of facility policies/procedures, review of the facility's investigation reports, review of quality assurance and process improvement (QAPI) audits, and staff interviews,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity and provide privacy for 1 of 19 sampled residents (Resident #64) observed during personal ca...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current status for 1 of 32 sampled residents (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #71) with...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain food and dishware storage areas in a sanitary manner for 1 of 1 kitchen (main kitchen). Failure to...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 32% turnover. Below North Dakota's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Smp Health - St Raphael's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Smp Health - St Raphael Staffed?
CMS rates SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 32%, compared to the North Dakota average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Smp Health - St Raphael?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 12 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Smp Health - St Raphael?
SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by SMP HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 170 certified beds and approximately 160 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in VALLEY CITY, North Dakota.
How Does Smp Health - St Raphael Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (32%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Smp Health - St Raphael?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Smp Health - St Raphael Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Smp Health - St Raphael Stick Around?
SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL has a staff turnover rate of 32%, which is about average for North Dakota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Smp Health - St Raphael Ever Fined?
SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL has been fined $8,190 across 1 penalty action. This is below the North Dakota average of $33,161. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Smp Health - St Raphael on Any Federal Watch List?
SMP HEALTH - ST RAPHAEL is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.