MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
McKenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families seeking care. With a state rank of #26 out of 72 facilities, they are in the top half of North Dakota options, and they are the only facility in McKenzie County, ranking #1 locally. The facility is showing improvement, with the number of issues decreasing from 5 in 2023 to 3 in 2024. Staffing is a strong point, boasting a perfect 5/5 stars and a turnover rate of 48%, which matches the state average. However, they have faced some concerns, including a serious incident where a resident was burned by a hot beverage due to improper serving practices, and a failure to ensure the dietary manager had the necessary qualifications, which could risk food safety. Additionally, they did not provide written transfer notices for residents sent to the hospital, which could hinder informed decision-making for families.
- Trust Score
- B
- In North Dakota
- #26/72
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $6,300 in fines. Lower than most North Dakota facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 69 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of North Dakota nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near North Dakota avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Jun 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the resident or the resident's representative a written notice of transfer for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #3, #5, #10...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice upon transfer to the hospital for 5 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #3, #5, #1...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, review of the facility reported incident investigation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of hazards for 1 of 1 sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans to reflect the current status for 1 of 12 sampled...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, review of facility policy, review of a professional reference, and staff interview, the facility failed to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow standards of infection control for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #12, #13 and #3...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 dietary manager (#1) obtained the proper qualifications to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. Failure to ensure staff ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 observation of a nebulizer treatment (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on facility policy, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and recommendations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess each resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 10 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within North Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care Staffed?
CMS rates MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the North Dakota average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE during 2022 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 9 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care?
MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 36 certified beds and approximately 34 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in WATFORD CITY, North Dakota.
How Does Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care Compare to Other North Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in North Dakota, MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in North Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care Stick Around?
MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for North Dakota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care Ever Fined?
MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE has been fined $6,300 across 1 penalty action. This is below the North Dakota average of $33,142. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Mckenzie County Healthcare Systems Long Term Care on Any Federal Watch List?
MCKENZIE COUNTY HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS LONG TERM CARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.