ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Anadarko Nursing & Rehab has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerns. They rank #40 out of 282 facilities in Oklahoma, placing them in the top half, and #1 out of 3 in Caddo County, meaning they are the best local option. However, the facility is trending downwards, with issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 5 in 2024. Although they maintain a 4/5 star rating overall, staffing is a concern with a rating of 3/5 stars and a turnover rate of 46%, which is below the state average of 55%. The facility has faced significant issues, including a critical incident where a resident was not safely secured in a wheelchair during transport, resulting in serious injury, and another critical failure to provide a prescribed therapeutic diet that led to a resident choking and hospitalization. While there are strengths in the overall quality ratings, these serious incidents highlight important areas for families to consider.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Oklahoma
- #40/282
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $14,867 in fines. Higher than 70% of Oklahoma facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 8 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Oklahoma. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Oklahoma avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** A past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was determined to exist effective 11/13/24 related to the facility's failure to ens...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's power of attorney was notified of doctor appointments for one (#28) of two sampled residents reviewed for notifications...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer residents with newly diagnosed mental illnesses to the OHCA a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a level I PASARR assessment was completed before or on admis...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from sexual abuse for one (#47) of five ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans with new interventions after a fall with injury to prevent future falls for one (#31) of seven residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate the cause of a fall and implement new interventions to prevent falls for one (#31) of seven residents reviewed fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared in a manner to maintain flavor and nutritive value.
The dietary manager reported five residents received a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene and food safety while serving food, drinks, and snacks to residents.
The administrator reported 78...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2022
4 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 10/19/22, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide a physici...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a choking incident for one (#2) of five residents reviewed for physician notification. The incident le...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to implement the resident's Care Plan, and perform a Hei...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered per physician orders for one (#64) of one resident reviewed for pain management.
The...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 13 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $14,867 in fines. Above average for Oklahoma. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade D (49/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Anadarko Nursing & Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Oklahoma, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Anadarko Nursing & Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the Oklahoma average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Anadarko Nursing & Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB during 2022 to 2024. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 11 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Anadarko Nursing & Rehab?
ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by BRADFORD MONTGOMERY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 92 certified beds and approximately 77 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ANADARKO, Oklahoma.
How Does Anadarko Nursing & Rehab Compare to Other Oklahoma Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma, ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Anadarko Nursing & Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Anadarko Nursing & Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Anadarko Nursing & Rehab Stick Around?
ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for Oklahoma nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Anadarko Nursing & Rehab Ever Fined?
ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB has been fined $14,867 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Oklahoma average of $33,228. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Anadarko Nursing & Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
ANADARKO NURSING & REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.