HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Holiday Heights Healthcare in Norman, Oklahoma, has received a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is recommended and above average compared to other facilities. It ranks #15 out of 282 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and #1 out of 10 in Cleveland County, indicating it is the best option locally. The facility is trending positively, with concerns decreasing from three issues in 2023 to two in 2024. Staffing is rated as average with a 3 out of 5 stars, and while turnover is at 65%, this is close to the state average of 55%. Notably, there have been no fines, which is a good sign, and the RN coverage is also average, meaning residents receive standard oversight. However, there are some weaknesses to consider. The facility has faced several concerns, including inaccurately recorded assessments for residents and issues with food storage and kitchen cleanliness. For example, the kitchen had unsanitary conditions, such as dirty blankets and food particles in freezers, which raises hygiene concerns. Additionally, there was a serious breach of privacy when staff were found to have taken and shared photos of residents without consent. Overall, while Holiday Heights Healthcare has strengths in its ranking and lack of fines, families should be aware of the cleanliness and privacy issues that have been identified.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Oklahoma
- #15/282
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 65% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Oklahoma facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Oklahoma. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
19pts above Oklahoma avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
17 points above Oklahoma average of 48%
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Laboratory Services
(Tag F0770)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were obtained per physician's order for one (#15) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.
ADON #1 i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments were accurately entered for th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for two (#8 and #48) of thirteen sampled residents whose assessments...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a new serious mental illness diagnosis to OHC...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly store food and keep the kitchen and equipment clean and in good repair.
The DM identified 45 residents received services from the ki...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy and confidentiality for six (#4, 15, 34, 43, 147, and #247) of six sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care and bathing for two (#8 and #36) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADL care.
The Census...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0801
(Tag F0801)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to guarantee the person designated to serve as the DM was certified no later than on year after hire and/or maintained certification.
The DON...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen clean and in good repair.
The DON identified 42 residents received services from the kitchen.
Findings:
On 01/04/22 at 8...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Oklahoma.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Oklahoma facilities.
- • 65% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Holiday Heights Healthcare's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Oklahoma, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Holiday Heights Healthcare Staffed?
CMS rates HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 65%, which is 19 percentage points above the Oklahoma average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Holiday Heights Healthcare?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE during 2022 to 2024. These included: 9 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Holiday Heights Healthcare?
HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by BRIDGES HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 51 certified beds and approximately 39 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in NORMAN, Oklahoma.
How Does Holiday Heights Healthcare Compare to Other Oklahoma Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma, HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.7, staff turnover (65%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Holiday Heights Healthcare?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Holiday Heights Healthcare Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Holiday Heights Healthcare Stick Around?
Staff turnover at HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE is high. At 65%, the facility is 19 percentage points above the Oklahoma average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Holiday Heights Healthcare Ever Fined?
HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Holiday Heights Healthcare on Any Federal Watch List?
HOLIDAY HEIGHTS HEALTHCARE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.