Park Place Healthcare and Rehab
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Park Place Healthcare and Rehab has received a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns about the quality of care provided. In terms of ranking, they do not appear in the state or county rankings, suggesting they may not be competitive with other facilities in Oklahoma. The facility is reportedly improving, as the number of issues decreased from 22 in 2024 to 8 in 2025. However, staffing is a major weakness, with a troubling turnover rate of 90%, far exceeding the state average of 55%, and they have received $261,349 in fines, higher than 98% of other facilities in Oklahoma. Specific incidents raise serious alarm, such as a resident with schizophrenia not receiving their prescribed medications for several days, which is a critical violation. Additionally, another resident with diabetes did not receive their diabetic medication for two consecutive months, indicating severe lapses in care. While there is some positive movement in reducing issues, the overall environment and past incidents suggest families should proceed with caution.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Oklahoma
- #112/223
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 90% turnover. Very high, 42 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $261,349 in fines. Higher than 98% of Oklahoma facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 11 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Oklahoma. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 45 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
44pts above Oklahoma avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
42 points above Oklahoma average of 48%
The Ugly 45 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
On 08/13/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure supervision was provided to a resident who smoked and used oxygen that resulted in...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2025
3 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
On 05/28/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse and failure to implement interventions to pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to local law enforcement for 3 (#3, 4 and #5) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
The DON and the regi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update a residents care plan after abusive behaviors were observed for two (#3 and #4) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.
The DON a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2025
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control was maintained and EBP were followed during medication administration to a resident with a PEG tube ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to determine if residents wished to formulate an advanced directive fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide safe flooring in the common area where all halls connect to other common areas.
The DON identified 50 residents resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were secured when not in use for two of two medication carts observed.
The DON identified 50 resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
14 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 days of a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan for one (#27) of 13 sampled residents who's care plans were reviewed.
The DON identified 47 residents resided in the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders for dialysis were completed for one (#27) of one sampled residents who were reviewed for dialysis.
The DON identified 47 resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information, which included the facility name, date, actual hours worked for RNs, LPNs, CMAs, and CNAs, and the resident cens...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotic stewardship program policy was followed for one (#26) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure emergency call cords were long enough to be reached by the one (#13) resident if they were lying in bed of 13 sampled residents review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0576
(Tag F0576)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide mail delivery to residents on Saturdays.
The DON identified 47 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
A Resident Rights poli...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified upon receipt of the culture and sensitivity results from a urinalysis for one (#26) of five sampled resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (#147) of thirteen sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed in a timely manner for tw...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an ongoing activity program was designed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for one (Hall 500) of two medication/treatment carts observed for medication storage during medication admini...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0809
(Tag F0809)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure snacks were offered in the evening for four (#5,19, 37, and #39) of eleven sampled residents reviewed for snacks.
The DON identifie...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were utilized for...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a SNF ABN to one (#25) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification.
The Administrator identified four residents who ha...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Resident's wall was in good repair for one (#45) of 16 sampled residents reviewed for home like environment.
The Adm...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for one (#24) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis.
The Administrator identified 46 residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review a prn lorazepam after 14 days of use for one (resident #39) of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications.
Findings:
The U...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dirty linen was transported in a manner to prevent cross contamination.
The Administrator identified 46 residents resided in the facil...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide showers for two (#4 and #15) of two sampled residents reviewed for ADL assistance.
The DON identified 46 residents who required as...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete ongoing assessments of a resident pre and post dialysis for one (#24) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis services.
The...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure:
a. an antibiotic stewardship program was implemented for one (#20) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications; ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
15 deficiencies
5 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY**
On 02/24/23, the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) confirmed the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation related ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 03/02/23, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facilities failure to implement interve...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0742
(Tag F0742)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 02/24/23 at the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) confirmed the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation related...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Resident #10 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic amyotrophy, hepatitis C...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3.
Resident #10 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic amyotrophy, hepatitis ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician and family were notified for a change in condi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders as ordered for three (#38, 161, #163) of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide sufficient and competent staff to ensure:
A. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to have a registered nurse as a DON (Director of Nursing) on a fulltime basis.
The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to prepared pureed diets to preserve nutritive value.
The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 2/22/23, ide...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff sanitized the blood pressure cuff after resident use for six (#1, 9, 23, 34, 60, and #52) of eight sampled resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure repairs were made to the building ensure a clean, safe, and sanitary home like environment.
The Resident Census and Co...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0924
(Tag F0924)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand rails were in good repair and firmly affi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 7. Resident #7 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cognitive communic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus:
A. Were followed,
B. Reflect the input ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 7 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, $261,349 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 45 deficiencies on record, including 7 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $261,349 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Oklahoma. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Park Place Healthcare And Rehab's CMS Rating?
Park Place Healthcare and Rehab does not currently have a CMS star rating on record.
How is Park Place Healthcare And Rehab Staffed?
Staff turnover is 90%, which is 44 percentage points above the Oklahoma average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 100%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Park Place Healthcare And Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 45 deficiencies at Park Place Healthcare and Rehab during 2023 to 2025. These included: 7 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 38 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Park Place Healthcare And Rehab?
Park Place Healthcare and Rehab is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GLOBAL HEALTHCARE REIT, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 106 certified beds and approximately 51 residents (about 48% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
How Does Park Place Healthcare And Rehab Compare to Other Oklahoma Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma, Park Place Healthcare and Rehab's staff turnover (90%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Park Place Healthcare And Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Park Place Healthcare And Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Park Place Healthcare and Rehab has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 7 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 0-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Park Place Healthcare And Rehab Stick Around?
Staff turnover at Park Place Healthcare and Rehab is high. At 90%, the facility is 44 percentage points above the Oklahoma average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 100%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Park Place Healthcare And Rehab Ever Fined?
Park Place Healthcare and Rehab has been fined $261,349 across 5 penalty actions. This is 7.3x the Oklahoma average of $35,692. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Park Place Healthcare And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
Park Place Healthcare and Rehab is currently on the Special Focus Facility (SFF) watch list. This federal program identifies the roughly 1% of nursing homes nationally with the most serious and persistent quality problems. SFF facilities receive inspections roughly twice as often as typical nursing homes. Factors in this facility's record include 7 Immediate Jeopardy findings, a substantiated abuse finding, and $261,349 in federal fines. Facilities that fail to improve face escalating consequences, potentially including termination from Medicare and Medicaid. Families considering this facility should ask for documentation of recent improvements and what specific changes have been made since the designation.