WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Windsor Hills Nursing Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided at the facility. It ranks #190 out of 282 nursing homes in Oklahoma, placing it in the bottom half of all facilities in the state, and #26 out of 39 in Oklahoma County, meaning there are only a few local options that are better. Although the facility’s issues have improved from 13 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025, it still reported 29 total issues, with 4 serious incidents that caused harm. Staffing is a relative strength, rated 4 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 56%, which aligns closely with the state average, and the facility offers more RN coverage than 84% of Oklahoma facilities, helping to catch potential problems. However, concerning fines of $62,621, which are higher than 86% of other facilities in the state, suggest ongoing compliance problems. Specific incidents include a resident suffering a facial fracture after seven falls without interventions and another resident experiencing multiple falls leading to serious injuries, indicating gaps in fall prevention protocols. Additionally, there was a failure to prevent inappropriate sexual contact between residents, highlighting serious issues with resident safety and supervision.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Oklahoma
- #190/282
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $62,621 in fines. Lower than most Oklahoma facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Oklahoma. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 29 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Oklahoma average (2.6)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near Oklahoma avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
8 points above Oklahoma average of 48%
The Ugly 29 deficiencies on record
Sept 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was not touched sexually by another resident for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
11 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for monthly catheter changes was followe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident Assessments were accurately coded for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dietary interventions as ordered by the physician for one (#5) of one resident whose clinical records were reviewed for nutrition. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication room was secured when not in use.
The Administrator identified 58 residents resided in the facility.
Findings:
A Medic...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure glucometers were disinfected appropriately before and after use on residents.
The administrator identified 58 residents resided in the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the advance directive acknowledgement forms were completed for two (#7 and #23) of three sampled residents reviewed for advance dire...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for three (#7, #23, and #53) of 24 sampled residents who were revi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0676
(Tag F0676)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have effective communication using picture exchange communication for one (#53) of one resident who required pictures and/or ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received an antipsychotic medication had an appropriate diagnosis for the use of medication for one (#36) of five sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate menus were posted and followed for three of three meal services observed.
Findings:
The Administrator identi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was maintained at an appropriate temperature for two of two kitchen observations and maintain a sanitary tray lin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0745
(Tag F0745)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered psychiatric evaluation was arranged for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for outside appointments.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure:
a. medication was administered as ordered for one (#2); and
b. medication was available for administration for one (#2) of three sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0637
(Tag F0637)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment was completed for one (#7) o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to administer a pneumonia vaccine for one (#6) of five sampled residents reviewed for immunizations.
The Resident Census and Conditions of Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete background checks for three of seven staff members whose employee files were reviewed for completed background checks.
The Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff:
a. cleaned insulin vials prior to administration for two (#35, and #154), and
b. did not draw insulin from an ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly dated and stored in a sanitary manner.
The dietary manager identified 54 residents who receiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(H)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided supervision to prevent...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who admitted as a moderate fall risk had a care p...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure were reviewed and revised for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls.
The DON identified 43 residents w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
A past noncompliance with harm was determined to exist effective 01/12/23 related to the facility's failure to provide correctly administered pain medication. The facility failed to follow their medic...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2022
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from a significant medication error related to insulin for two (#7 and #10) of two sampled reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0809
(Tag F0809)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with physician ordered modified texture diets had snacks available for one (#47) of three sampled residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to
a. ensure wheelchairs were in good repair for four (#...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assisted with transfers and dressing for one (#55) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for ADL c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to have a medication error rate of less than 5% for three (#7, 10 and #163) of five residents observed receiving medications. Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure an insulin pen was not used for more than one resident for one (#10) of two sampled residents who had been administered...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 4 harm violation(s), $62,621 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 29 deficiencies on record, including 4 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $62,621 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Oklahoma. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Windsor Hills Nursing Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Oklahoma, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Windsor Hills Nursing Center Staffed?
CMS rates WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the Oklahoma average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Windsor Hills Nursing Center?
State health inspectors documented 29 deficiencies at WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 that caused actual resident harm and 25 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Windsor Hills Nursing Center?
WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by DIAKONOS GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 112 certified beds and approximately 52 residents (about 46% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma.
How Does Windsor Hills Nursing Center Compare to Other Oklahoma Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma, WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.6, staff turnover (56%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Windsor Hills Nursing Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Windsor Hills Nursing Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Oklahoma. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Windsor Hills Nursing Center Stick Around?
Staff turnover at WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the Oklahoma average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Windsor Hills Nursing Center Ever Fined?
WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER has been fined $62,621 across 3 penalty actions. This is above the Oklahoma average of $33,705. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Windsor Hills Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?
WINDSOR HILLS NURSING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.