MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice for families considering care options. It ranks #12 out of 127 nursing homes in Oregon, placing it in the top half, and #3 out of 33 in Multnomah County, meaning only two local options are better. The facility is improving, with reported issues decreasing from 7 in 2024 to 5 in 2025. Staffing is a strong point here, with a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 41%, which is below the Oregon average of 49%. However, the facility has $10,033 in fines, which is average, and there have been some concerning incidents, such as a resident who fell due to inadequate support during transfers and issues with food storage that could risk foodborne illness. Additionally, there were days without registered nurse coverage, highlighting an area for improvement.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Oregon
- #12/127
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 41% turnover. Near Oregon's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $10,033 in fines. Lower than most Oregon facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 44 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Oregon. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 18 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (41%)
7 points below Oregon average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Oregon avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 18 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to implement a physician order on ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0909
(Tag F0909)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed was in good repair for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to provide maintenance to maintain a safe, comfortable ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled in a way to minimize food spoilage in 1 of 2 unit refrigerators and safe food stora...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented for 2 of 2 residents (#1 and 18) reviewed for catheter care and pressure ul...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
7 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident 47 was admitted to the facility in 6/2023 with diagnoses including dementia with a behavioral disturbance.
Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to provide a written Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) in a timely fashion for 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 2 of 5 sampled residents ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a new/accurate Level I PASARR when the facility...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to develop a person centered comprehensi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 5 sampled residents (#47) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to perform post-dialysis assessments on 1 of 1 sampled residents (#33) reviewed for dialysis. This placed reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to accurately reflect resident needs for 1 of 2 sampled residents (#6) reviewed fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure waste was properly contained in dumpsters and garbage storage areas were maintained in a sanitary condition for 1 of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to screen residents for eligibility and failed to adm...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for 8 consecutive hours per day 7 days per week for 54 out of 151 days reviewed for staffing. This plac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure food was labeled and stored in a manner to minimize spoilage and cross contamination. The facility als...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to develop and implement a water management program and conduct a risk analysis assessment for potential areas of growth and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 41% turnover. Below Oregon's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 18 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $10,033 in fines. Above average for Oregon. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Oregon, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab Staffed?
CMS rates MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Oregon average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab?
State health inspectors documented 18 deficiencies at MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 17 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab?
MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MARQUIS COMPANIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 58 residents (about 72% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in PORTLAND, Oregon.
How Does Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab Compare to Other Oregon Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Oregon, MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Oregon. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab Stick Around?
MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Oregon nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab Ever Fined?
MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB has been fined $10,033 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Oregon average of $33,179. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Marquis Centennial Post Acute Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?
MARQUIS CENTENNIAL POST ACUTE REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.