KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing at New Castle has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but may not meet everyone's expectations. It ranks #300 out of 653 facilities in Pennsylvania, placing it in the top half, and #5 out of 8 in Lawrence County, meaning there are only a few local options that perform better. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 2 in 2024 to 3 in 2025. Staffing is a strength here, with a 4 out of 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 40%, which is below the state average. However, the facility has faced some serious concerns, including a resident suffering a shoulder fracture due to inadequate assistance during bathing and food safety violations in the kitchen. Additionally, there have been complaints about staff being distracted by personal cell phone use, leading to longer wait times for assistance.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In Pennsylvania
- #300/653
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 40% turnover. Near Pennsylvania's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $8,018 in fines. Lower than most Pennsylvania facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 47 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Pennsylvania. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (40%)
8 points below Pennsylvania average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Pennsylvania average (3.0)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Pennsylvania avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
Aug 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on review of facility policy, observations and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that food was stored in accordance with standards for food safety for three o...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of facility policy and resident council minutes, observations, and staff and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff and ser...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of facility policies, dietary and clinical records, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide daily menus, update menu chan...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of resident rights, clinical records, and facility documentation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper resident assistance during bathing t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement care and services identified on a comprehensive care plan regarding provision of care ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of facility policy and clinical records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that it was free from significant medication errors for one of one r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean homelike environment for one of two resident neighborhoods (West Wing).
Findin...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 40% turnover. Below Pennsylvania's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 7 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Pennsylvania, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle Staffed?
CMS rates KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Pennsylvania average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm and 6 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle?
KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by KADIMA HEALTHCARE GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 62 certified beds and approximately 58 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in NEW CASTLE, Pennsylvania.
How Does Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle Compare to Other Pennsylvania Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania, KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE's overall rating (3 stars) matches the state average, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Pennsylvania. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle Stick Around?
KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Pennsylvania nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle Ever Fined?
KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE has been fined $8,018 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Pennsylvania average of $33,159. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Kadima Rehabilitation & Nursing At New Castle on Any Federal Watch List?
KADIMA REHABILITATION & NURSING AT NEW CASTLE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.