Alpine Nursing Home Inc
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Alpine Nursing Home Inc in Coventry, Rhode Island, has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #1 out of 72 facilities in the state, indicating it is among the best options available. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 7 in 2024 to just 2 in 2025. Staffing is a strength here, rated 5 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 29%, which is significantly lower than the state average, suggesting that staff are experienced and familiar with the residents. However, there have been some concerning incidents, such as a resident who fell and fractured a wrist during a transfer that did not use the required gait belt, and failures in dietary planning and food safety protocols that need attention. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and overall care, families should be aware of the specific incidents and ongoing improvements needed.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Rhode Island
- #1/72
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Rhode Island's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $7,901 in fines. Higher than 78% of Rhode Island facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 59 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Rhode Island. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
Low Staff Turnover (29%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (29%)
19 points below Rhode Island average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide a dietary menu that meets the nutritional needs of residents in accordance with established natio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standard...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that are accurately documented in accordance with professi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to conduct appropriate infection control practices relative to personal protective eq...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that services provided meet professional standards of quality relative to fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0699
(Tag F0699)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive trauma informed care in accordance with profession...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nur...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 1 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure tha...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents maintain accepta...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to properly s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (86/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Rhode Island.
- • 29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Rhode Island's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 12 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Alpine Nursing Home Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Alpine Nursing Home Inc an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Rhode Island, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Alpine Nursing Home Inc Staffed?
CMS rates Alpine Nursing Home Inc's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 29%, compared to the Rhode Island average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Alpine Nursing Home Inc?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at Alpine Nursing Home Inc during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 10 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Alpine Nursing Home Inc?
Alpine Nursing Home Inc is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 58 residents (about 97% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Coventry, Rhode Island.
How Does Alpine Nursing Home Inc Compare to Other Rhode Island Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island, Alpine Nursing Home Inc's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (29%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Alpine Nursing Home Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Alpine Nursing Home Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Alpine Nursing Home Inc has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Alpine Nursing Home Inc Stick Around?
Staff at Alpine Nursing Home Inc tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 29%, the facility is 17 percentage points below the Rhode Island average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 15%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Alpine Nursing Home Inc Ever Fined?
Alpine Nursing Home Inc has been fined $7,901 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Rhode Island average of $33,158. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Alpine Nursing Home Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
Alpine Nursing Home Inc is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.