Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Company has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns about care quality. Ranked #46 out of 72 facilities in Rhode Island, they are in the bottom half, and #25 out of 41 in Providence County, meaning there are better local options available. While the facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 6 in 2024 to 5 in 2025, they still reported 24 total issues, including a serious incident where a resident's arm was broken due to inadequate monitoring after a fall. Staffing is a relative strength with a 4 out of 5 rating, though turnover is at 47%, which is average for the state. However, they have incurred $32,483 in fines, reflecting ongoing compliance issues, and have faced critical findings related to infection control during a norovirus outbreak, highlighting the need for better safety protocols.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Rhode Island
- #46/72
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 47% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $32,483 in fines. Higher than 99% of Rhode Island facilities. Major compliance failures.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Rhode Island. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Rhode Island average (3.1)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Rhode Island avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 24 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to respect the residents' right to personal privacy for 1 of 1 resident observed rela...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice in accordance with physician orders and the comprehensive person-...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident receives appropriate assistive devices to prevent accidents for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a supr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Antibiotic Stewardship
(Tag F0881)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed in accordance with professional standar...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 out 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
7 deficiencies
1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmissi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, relative to individualizin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 residents reviewed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for assessing and diagnosing a resident with a psychiatric disorder...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for care and delivery of parentera...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food serv...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that services provided by the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 of 3 residents reviewed relative to med...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2022
2 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents relative to transfers for 1 o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigate...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $32,483 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 24 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $32,483 in fines. Higher than 94% of Rhode Island facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (38/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Rhode Island, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Staffed?
CMS rates Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 47%, compared to the Rhode Island average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com?
State health inspectors documented 24 deficiencies at Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 22 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com?
Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by EDEN HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 72 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Greenville, Rhode Island.
How Does Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Compare to Other Rhode Island Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island, Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (47%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Stick Around?
Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com has a staff turnover rate of 47%, which is about average for Rhode Island nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Ever Fined?
Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com has been fined $32,483 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Rhode Island average of $33,404. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com on Any Federal Watch List?
Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.