Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com

20 Austin Avenue, Greenville, RI 02828 (401) 949-3880
For profit - Limited Liability company 80 Beds EDEN HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
38/100
#46 of 72 in RI
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Company has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns about care quality. Ranked #46 out of 72 facilities in Rhode Island, they are in the bottom half, and #25 out of 41 in Providence County, meaning there are better local options available. While the facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 6 in 2024 to 5 in 2025, they still reported 24 total issues, including a serious incident where a resident's arm was broken due to inadequate monitoring after a fall. Staffing is a relative strength with a 4 out of 5 rating, though turnover is at 47%, which is average for the state. However, they have incurred $32,483 in fines, reflecting ongoing compliance issues, and have faced critical findings related to infection control during a norovirus outbreak, highlighting the need for better safety protocols.

Trust Score
F
38/100
In Rhode Island
#46/72
Bottom 37%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
6 → 5 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
47% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$32,483 in fines. Higher than 99% of Rhode Island facilities. Major compliance failures.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Rhode Island. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
24 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 6 issues
2025: 5 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Rhode Island average (3.1)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 47%

Near Rhode Island avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $32,483

Below median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: EDEN HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 24 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Mar 2025 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to respect the residents' right to personal privacy for 1 of 1 resident observed rela...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to respect the residents' right to personal privacy for 1 of 1 resident observed relative to his/her weight, Resident ID #10, and for 1 of 1 resident observed during a wound dressing change, Resident ID #52. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of a policy titled POLICY/PROCEDURE PRIVACY states in part, .The resident has a right to secure and confidential personal and medical records . Surveyor observations of Resident ID #10 revealed his/her name and weight was posted at the entrance of his/her room, which was visible from the hallway on the following dates and times: - 3/17/2025 at approximately 9:30 AM and 2:00 PM - 3/18/2025 at 9:15 AM During a surveyor interview on 3/18/2025 at 10:11 AM with the Assistant Director of Nursing Services, she acknowledged that Resident ID #10's weight was posted at his/her doorway and visible to anyone who walked by. 2. Additional record review of the policy titled POLICY/PROCEDURE PRIVACY states in part, .Personal privacy includes accommodations, medical treatment . Record review revealed Resident ID #52 was admitted to the facility in October of 2023 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, pressure ulcer of the left heel, stage 3 (a wound caused by pressure with full-thickness skin loss with damage to subcutaneous tissue without visible bone, tendon, or muscle). During a surveyor observation on 3/18/2025 at 2:37 PM of a wound dressing change to the resident's left heel pressure ulcer, Registered Nurse, Staff A, failed to close the privacy curtain between Resident ID #52 and his/her roommate, prior to starting the wound treatment. During a surveyor interview with Staff A following the above observation, she was unable to provide evidence that the resident's privacy was protected, as the privacy curtain remained open during the wound dressing change. During a surveyor interview on 3/18/2025 at 4:17 PM with the Director of Nursing Services, she revealed that she would expect staff to provide privacy for the residents.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, relative to following physician's orders relative obtaining laboratory test panels for 1 of 3 residents receiving Atorvastatin (a medication prescribed to treat high cholesterol, without proper monitoring Atorvastatin can lead to liver and kidney damage), Resident ID #52. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the MRR dated 12/18/2024 had recommendations made by the pharmacist to consider an annual lipid panel (a blood test that measures the levels of various fats in the bloodstream) and a hepatic function panel (a blood test that assess liver health and function) to monitor for therapeutic effects and side effects of Atorvastatin. Additional review of the report indicated the provider signed in agreement on 1/3/2025. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 1/13/2025, to obtain a laboratory test for the lipid panel and hepatic function panel. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the above-mentioned laboratory tests were obtained. During a surveyor interview on 3/19/2025 at 10:58 AM with the Director of Nursing Services, she was unable to provide evidence that a lipid panel and a hepatic function panel were obtained, as ordered.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice in accordance with physician orders and the comprehensive person-...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice in accordance with physician orders and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed receiving antibiotics via a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC; a long flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the arm and threaded through a larger vein leading to the heart, used to administer intravenous (IV) fluids and medications), Resident ID #125. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility pharmacy policy titled, IV Site Care and Maintenance Flush Chart, indicates that a 10 milliliter (ml) IV flush with a normal saline solution (a sterile fluid containing salt and water) is required before and after using the PICC line. Additionally, the policy indicates minimum intervals for flushing each lumen (an internal tube within the catheter that allows for the administration of fluids and medications) with 10 ml of saline, every 8 hours and as needed. Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, sepsis due to methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, a bacterial infection caused by a type of staph bacteria that has become resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics). Record review revealed the resident had a PICC line placed on 3/6/2025. Record review revealed the resident was receiving Vancomycin (an antibiotic prescribed to treat various infections) solution 1.5 grams intravenously, every 12 hours. Further record review failed to reveal evidence of a physician's order for a 10 ml saline flush, before and after administering the Vancomycin. During a surveyor interview on 3/19/2025 at 1:45 PM with Registered Nurse, Staff C, she acknowledged that the resident did not have an order for a 10 ml saline flush for his/her PICC line before and after administering the Vancomycin antibiotic. During a surveyor interview on 3/19/2025 at 1:36 PM with the pharmacist, from the facility's contracted pharmacy, he revealed that a 10 ml saline flush is indicated before and after administering a medication via the PICC line. Additionally, he indicated that an additional 10 ml saline flush should be administered on the shift that the resident is not receiving the antibiotic.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff have the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety, relative to a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC; a long flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the arm and threaded through a larger vein leading to the heart, used to administer intravenous (IV) fluids and medications) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a PICC, Resident ID #125. Findings are as follows: According to the Lippincott Nursing Procedures Ninth Edition (2023), states in part, .Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Use .Use a sterile measuring tape or the incremental markings on the catheter to measure the external length of the catheter from hub to skin entry to make sure that the catheter hasn't migrated .Troubleshooting a PICC .if external PICC migration [unintended movement from it's intended position] is greater than 3/4 inches (2 [centimeter] cm), notify the practitioner. Obtain an order for an X-ray or other diagnostic test to confirm tip placement [ensuring that the catheter's tip internally is still located in the optimal place for PICC line use] . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, sepsis due to methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, a bacterial infection caused by a type of staph bacteria that has become resistant to commonly prescribed antibiotics). Record review of a document titled, PICC Insertion Record indicated that the resident's PICC line was placed on 3/6/2025 at 4:45 PM. Additionally, the external catheter length measurement (the length of the visible portion of the PICC line outside the body) had a measurement of 0 cm. Record review of a progress note dated 3/13/2025, authored by Registered Nurse (RN), Staff D, revealed that during the dressing change, he obtained an external catheter measurement of 8 cm. During a surveyor interview on 3/19/2025 at 1:25 PM with Staff D, he revealed by demonstration, that he measured the external catheter length from the insertion site on the resident's arm to the beginning of the hub located at the end of the PICC lumen (the internal opening or channel within the catheter tubing that allows for fluids or medications to flow). When asked further about the difference in the external catheter length measurement documented from the day the PICC line was placed, and his documented external catheter measurement obtained on 3/6/2025, he could not explain why the measurement had a difference of 8 cm in length. During a subsequent interview with Staff D, approximately 15 minutes later, he revealed that he had just obtained an additional measurement of the external catheter length and indicated that the measurement is less than 0.5 cm. Staff D acknowledged that he initially measured the external catheter length incorrectly on 3/13/2025 and that he did not review the previous external catheter length measurement prior to obtaining the 3/13/2025 measurement. During a surveyor interview on 3/19/2025 at 1:45 PM with RN, Staff C, when asked how she measures the external catheter length of a PICC line, she was unable to accurately explain how to obtain the measurement of the external catheter length. During a surveyor interview on 3/19/2025 at 2:11 PM with RN, Staff A, when asked how she measures the external catheter length of a PICC line, she was unable to accurately explain how to measure the external catheter length. During a surveyor interview on 3/19/2025 at approximately 3:00 PM with the Nursing Staff Educator, Staff E, she revealed that the external portion of a PICC line has small lines indicating a measurement and that she would expect staff to utilize those lines to measure the external catheter length.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety relative to the main kitchen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a certified food protection manager was available during the preparation of all meals. Findings are as follows: 1. Review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 3.501.16 states in part, .Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding .shall be maintained at .5 degrees (°) C [Celsius] (41°Fahrenheit [F]) or less . During surveyor observations of the lunch meal tray service on 3/17/2025 at 11:49 AM in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) the following was revealed: - [NAME] bean salad on a tray set in ice, with a cold holding temperature of 53 °F. - Turkey salad sandwiches on a tray set in ice, with a cold holding temperature of 49.3 °F. Following the above observation, the surveyor asked the FSD if there were any other sandwiches. The following food items and temperatures were then observed in the walk-in refrigerator: - 24 prepared turkey salad sandwiches, with a temperature of 48.9 °F. - A four quart container, approximately half filled with turkey salad dated 3/13, with a temperature of 43 °F. - A four quart container with egg salad, dated 3/13, with a temperature of 44.2 °F. During a surveyor interview on 3/17/2025 at 12:05 PM with the FSD and Cook, Staff F, who had prepared the lunch meal, they acknowledged the above mentioned items were not at the appropriate cold holding temperatures and immediately discarded. During a follow-up visit to the main kitchen on 3/18/2025 at 11:40 AM, the following was observed in the walk-in refrigerator in the presence of the FSD: - A four quart container, approximately ¾ filled with chicken salad, dated 3/17, with a cold holding temperature of 59.4 °F. An additional temperature was obtained using the surveyor's thermometer which indicated the chicken salad was 58.8 °F. During a surveyor interview immediately following the observation with the FSD, he was unsure why the prepared chicken salad was not at a cold holding temperature of 41°F or below. 2. Review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 2-102.12, Certified Food Protection Manager states in part, (A) At least one employee that has supervisory and management responsibility and the authority to direct and control food preparation and service shall be a certified food protection manager who has shown proficiency of required information through passing a test that is part of an accredited program . During a subsequent tour of the main kitchen on 3/18/2025 at 11:28 AM, surveyor observation failed to reveal evidence of a Food Safety Manager certification for Cook, Staff G. During a surveyor interview with the FSD at the time of the above observation, he indicated that when he reports to work he arrives in the kitchen at 6:00 AM and leaves at approximately 3:30 PM. During a surveyor interview with Staff G, in the presence of the FSD on 3/18/2025 at 1:35 PM, he revealed that his responsibilities as a cook include preparing, cooking, and serving the evening meal. Additionally, he was unable to provide evidence that he has a Food Safety Manager certification, as required. Record review of the kitchen staff schedule from 3/2/2025 through 3/18/2025 revealed that Staff G was the only cook working during the evening meal service on the following dates and times: - Sunday, 3/2/2025, 2:00 PM - 7:30 PM - Tuesday, 3/4/2025, 3:30 PM - 7:30 PM - Wednesday, 3/5/2025, 3:30 PM - 7:30 PM - Thursday, 3/6/2025, 3:30 PM - 7:30 PM - Friday, 3/7/2025, 3:30 PM - 7:30 PM - Monday, 3/10/2025, 4:00 PM - 7:30 PM - Tuesday, 3/11/2025, 4:00 PM - 7:30 PM - Wednesday, 3/12/2025, 3:30 PM - 7:30 PM - Thursday, 3/13/2025, 3:30 PM - 7:30 PM - Saturday, 3/15/2025, 1:45 PM - 7:30 PM - Sunday, 3/16/2025, 2:00 PM - 7:30 PM During a surveyor interview with the FSD on 3/18/2025 at 1:45 PM, he was unable to provide evidence that a certified Food Safety Manager was on the premises during all meal service and preperation on the above-mentioned dates and times.
Apr 2024 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for the use of insulin, Resident ID #65. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that Resident ID #65 was admitted to the facility in January of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and urinary tract infection. Review of the care plan dated 2/5/2024 revealed that s/he is at increased risk for hypo/hyperglycemia (low or high blood sugar) with an intervention which includes, but is not limited to, administer medication as ordered. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 2/3/2024 for insulin glargine-yfgn (a long-acting type of insulin that works slowly), insulin pen to administer 5 units subcutaneously daily. Review of the Medication Administration Report from 3/20/2024 through 4/10/2024 revealed the follow days the insulin was not administered and was held: - 3/21/2024 - 4/6/2024 - 4/7/2024 - 4/8/2024 Record review failed to reveal evidence of an order to hold the resident's insulin. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the provider was notified that the resident's insulin was held. During a surveyor interview on 4/11/2024 at 8:45 AM with the Nurse Practitioner, he revealed that he would expect the facility to notify him when a resident's insulin is not administered. During a surveyor interview on 4/11/2024 at 9:57 AM with the Assistant Director of Nursing Services, she was unable to provide evidence that the resident's insulin was administered per the physician's order or that the provider was notified that the insulin was held on the above dates.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 2 residents observed for wound care, Resident ID #32. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed that the resident was readmitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pressure-induced deep tissue damage (pressure ulcer) and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus infection (multidrug resistant organism). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 3/26/2024 to cleanse the resident's left posterior calf unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which actual depth of the ulcer is completely obscured by yellow, tan, gray, green, brown, or black tissue in the wound bed) pressure ulcer with Dakin's (wound cleanser) solution apply skin prep to the area surrounding the wound followed by medi-honey (wound treatment) and alginate (wound treatment) and wrap with kerlix (gauze wrap). The order further revealed to change the dressing every day and as needed. Review of the March and April 2024 Medication Administration Records revealed that the order was to be completed on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, and not daily which resulted in 9 missed dressing changes. During a surveyor interview on 4/10/2024 at 11:27 AM with the Infection Preventionist and the Regional Infection Preventionist, they acknowledged the wound order was transcribed incorrectly for the unstageable wound to the resident's left calf and that it should have been transcribed to be changed daily.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident receives appropriate assistive devices to prevent accidents for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident receives appropriate assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for falls, Resident ID #44. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, traumatic subdural hemorrhage (a type of bleeding near your brain that can happen after a head injury) with loss of consciousness and down syndrome. Record review of the progress notes revealed the following: - 2/4/2024: The resident was ambulating without assistance in hall outside of day room. S/he leaned over to give a staff member a hug, sustained a loss of balance, resulting in a fall. - 2/24/2024: While in the bathroom with a staff member the resident sustained a fall with a head strike and was sent to the emergency room for evaluation resulting in the resident being readmitted to the hospital. S/he returned to the facility on 2/26/2024. - 3/17/2024: The resident ambulated with supervision, from unit dining room to bathroom in shower room, the resident washed his/her hands and started walking out of bathroom, s/he leaned backwards and fell onto his/her buttocks, the staff member witnessed fall. - 3/23/2024: S/he sustained a witnessed fall in his/her room. Record review of a document titled, Discharge Summary dated 2/26/2024, revealed the resident had an acute subdural hematoma that had increased in size since his/her prior subdural hematoma diagnosis. Review of an order for safe patient handling dated 2/2/2024, revealed the resident requires one assist for transfers and ambulation with the use of a gait belt. Surveyor observations on the following dates and times failed to reveal evidence that a gait belt was being used during ambulation and transfers with staff to aid in fall prevention: - 4/9/2024 at 1:44 PM - 4/9/2024 at 3:11 PM - 4/9/2024 at 3:38 PM During a surveyor interview with the Director of Rehabilitation on 4/9/2024 at 3:40 PM, she revealed that the resident's safe patient handling is determined by the Rehabilitation Department and communicated with the staff in writing in the following three areas: The facility electronic medical records in Matrix, in a 3-ring binder at the nurses' stations, and on a form that is filled out and hung inside the resident's closet doors. During a surveyor interview on 4/9/2024 at 3:50 PM with Physical Therapist, Staff A, she revealed it is her expectation that the staff would use a gait belt for all transfer and ambulation when assisting the resident. Additionally, she was unable to explain why the staff was not utilizing a gait belt on the above observations with Resident ID #44.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a supr...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a suprapubic catheter (a flexible rubber or plastic tube inserted into your bladder via a surgical opening in the abdomen), Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Foley Catheters dated 1/16/2024 states in part, .Keep the bag below the resident's waist/bladder . Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in February of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage of urinary flow), and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (mild to moderate damage to the kidneys which may lead to fluid build up). Further record review revealed that the resident has a suprapubic catheter (SP) tube in place. During multiple surveyor observations on 4/10/2024 the resident was observed with his/her drainage bag hung on the back of his/her wheelchair near his/her shoulders above the level of his/her bladder in the common area: - 9:03 AM - 9:25 AM - 9:41 AM - 10:04 AM - 12:16 PM During a surveyor interview on 4/10/2024 at 12:18 PM, with Registered Nurse Staff B, she acknowledged that the resident's drainage bag was hung on the back of his/her wheelchair near his/her shoulders above the level of his/her bladder and that it should be moved below the resident's waist/bladder. During a surveyor interview on 4/10/2024 at 1:39 PM with the Infection Preventionist and Regional Infection Preventionist, they revealed that they would expect the resident's drainage bag to be below the resident's waist/bladder.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to establish an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that must include, at a minimum, an antibiotic stewardship program which includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use to ensure that residents who require an antibiotic, are prescribed the appropriate antibiotic for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use, Resident ID #s 124 and 129. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility provided policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program states in part, .The antibiotic stewardship program is directed toward the correct use of antibiotic- the five D's -right diagnosis, the right medication, the right dose, the right duration, and the right deceleration . 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #124 was admitted to the facility in April of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, urinary tract infection and vascular dementia. Record review revealed a physician's order for Macrobid (an antibiotic) 100 milligram (mg) capsule every 12 hours from 4/2/2024 through 4/10/2024. Record review failed to reveal evidence of a urine culture and sensitivity from the hospital or facility to determine if the antibiotic is still indicated, adjustments should be made, or if the resident was on the correct antibiotic related to the infectious organism. 2. Record review revealed that Resident ID #129 was admitted to the facility in April of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, urinary tract infection and cough. Record review revealed a physician's order for cefuroxime axetil (an antibiotic) 500 mg tablet every 8 hours from 4/9/2024 through 4/15/2024. Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], revealed that Resident ID #129 was discharged from the hospital to the facility on cefuroxime axetil for the treatment of a urinary tract infection and pneumonia. Additional review of the hospital documents failed to reveal evidence of a urine culture and sensitivity result. Record review failed to reveal evidence of a urine culture and sensitivity to determine if the antibiotic is still indicated, adjustments should be made, or if the resident was on the correct antibiotic related to the infectious organism. During a surveyor interview on 4/11/2024 at 8:51 AM with the Nurse Practitioner, he revealed that if the resident is on an antibiotic and there are no sensitivities, the staff should either call the hospital to obtain the results or repeat the cultures in house to determine if the resident is on the correct antibiotic or if the antibiotic should be adjusted. During a surveyor interview on 4/11/2024 at 9:28 AM with the Infection Preventionist, she was unable to provide evidence that the facility had a process related to the review of, or obtaining of laboratory or diagnostic testing to determine if the antibiotic is still indicated or adjustments should be made when the resident is new to the facility or when the resident returns or is admitted from the hospital.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed in accordance with professional standar...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen and 2 of 2 kitchenettes observed. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, Section 3-501.17 states in part, .READY -TO-EAT-TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5 degrees Celsius or 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less for a maximum of 7 days. The day of preparation shall be counted as Day 1 . During the initial tour of the kitchen in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD), on 4/8/2024 at 8:15 AM, the following was observed in the main kitchen: - A 1.5-quart pan containing approximately 12 muffins, individually wrapped in plastic wrap, unlabeled and undated in the walk-in freezer - A box with a manufacturer's label of Shells with a use by label of 4/1/2024 in the walk-in freezer - A white pitcher labeled ice coffee with a use by date of 4/7/2024 in the reach in refrigerator During a surveyor interview, immediately following the above observations, the FSD acknowledged the above-mentioned items and indicated they should be discarded. 2. Record review of facility policy titled Food & Nutrition Services revealed in part .Food brought from other sources, such as restaurant leftovers or family home cooking, must be labeled with the residents name, date and will be destroyed upon reaching the 72-hour mark . During a surveyor observation of the 2nd floor kitchenette on 4/8/2024 in the presence of the FSD at approximately 9:07 AM, the following was observed: - A white pitcher labeled juice with use by date of 4/7/2024 - An undated loaf of bread - A container of yogurt with a manufacturer use by date of 3/31/2024 - A large paper plate containing food wrapped in aluminum foil dated 4/1/2024 - A 1.5-quart container of food with a red lid dated 4/3/2024 - A black to-go style container of food undated - A plastic container of food with a purple lid dated 4/4/2024 During a surveyor observation of the 3rd floor kitchenette on 4/8/2024 in the presence of the FSD at approximately 9:25 AM, the following was observed: - 3 undated and unlabeled blue bowls with lids containing dry cereal During a surveyor interview, immediately following the above observations, the FSD acknowledged the above-mentioned items and indicated they should be discarded. 3. Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 4-601.11 states in part, .(B) The FOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of cooking EQUIPMENT .shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other soil accumulations. (C) NON-FOOD CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, FOOD residue, and other debris . During a surveyor observation of the 2nd floor kitchenette on 4/8/2024 in the presence of the FSD at approximately 9:20 AM, the following was observed: - A microwave that was noted to have splattered dried food particles, black and red in color on the inside of the door window along with spots of dried food debris on the glass rotating dish and walls. During a surveyor interview, immediately following the above observations, the FSD acknowledged the above-mentioned microwave needed to be cleaned. 4. The Rhode Island Food Code 2018 Edition 5-202.13 reads in part, .an airgap between the water supply inlet and the flood level rim of the plumbing fixture equipment .shall be at least twice the diameter of the water supply inlet and may not be less than 25 mm (1 inch) . During the initial tour of the main kitchen in the presence of the FSD, on 4/8/2024 at 8:30 AM, revealed the ice machine did not have an air gap twice the diameter of the water supply inlet and 1 inch. Additionally, the drain below the pipe was noted to be overflowing and spilling onto the floor. During a surveyor interview with the FSD on 4/8/2024 immediately following the observation of the ice machine, he acknowledged the ice machine did not have an air gap of at least twice the diameter of the water supply inlet and 1 inch.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review for Resident ID #1 revealed that s/he was admitted to the facility in August of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, pain disorder with related psychological factors, vascular dementia with agitation, Hodgkin lymphoma (cancer of the immune system involving the lymphatic system), and congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Record review of the physician's orders revealed the following: -Vimpat (a medication prescribed to treat seizures) 50 milligram (mg) twice per day daily (7:00 AM- 11:00 PM and from 7:00 PM- 11:00 PM) with a start date of 8/25/2023 and an end date of 8/31/2023. -Lasix (a medication prescribed to treat fluid retention and congestive heart failure) 40 mg daily (7:00 AM- 11:00 AM) with a start date of 8/25/2023 and an end date of 8/28/2023. -Tramadol (a medication prescribed to treat moderate to severe pain) 50 mg twice per day with a start date of 8/25/2023 and an end date of 8/28/2023. Record review of the August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the following: -Vimpat was not administered from 8/25/2023 through 8/28/2023. This resulted in 7 missed opportunities for this drug to be given. -Lasix was not administered on 8/26/2023. This resulted in 1 missed opportunity for this drug to be given. -Tramadol was not administered from 8/25/2023 through 8/27/2023. This resulted in 5 missed opportunities for this drug to be given. During a surveyor interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing on 9/1/2023 at 3:15 PM, she was unable to provide evidence that the resident was given the above medications as ordered by the physician.
Aug 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice relative to observation and assessment of an access site and comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of the State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities revised 2/3/2023 states in part, Nursing facilities .must develop dialysis specific policies/procedures, based upon current standards of practice. This includes the care of a resident receiving dialysis services whether in the facility or at an offsite location .The development and implementation of a coordinated comprehensive care plan(s) that identifies nursing home and dialysis responsibilities and provides direction for nursing home staff; and .The development and implementation of interventions, based upon current standards of practice including, but not limited to documentation and monitoring of complications, pre-and post-dialysis weights, access sites, nutrition and hydration, lab tests, vital signs including blood pressure and medications .Assessing, observing and documenting care of access sites, as applicable, such as: - Auscultation/palpation of the AV fistula (pulse, bruit, and thrill) to assure adequate blood flow - Significant changes in the extremity when compared to the opposite extremity (edema, pain, redness) - Steal Syndrome (pain, numbness, discoloration, or cold to touch in the fingers or hand indicating inadequate arterial flow) - Skin integrity (waxy skin, ulcerations, drainage from incisions - Bruising/hematoma - Collateral vein distension (veins in access arm close to AV fistula becoming larger) - Complaints of pain or numbness - Evidence of infection at the surgical site, such as drainage, redness, tenderness at incision site, fever . Review of the facility provided policy titled Dialysis Patients; Care of states in part, .The thrill and bruit, when applicable, will be checked routinely per MD [Medical Doctor] order .The care plan will reflect the resident's dialysis status and any preferences and choices the resident verbalizes related to dialysis care and treatment. 1a. Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in June of 2023 with a diagnosis of, but is not limited to, chronic kidney disease. Additional record review revealed the resident attends dialysis on Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays and receives the dialysis via an AV fistula (connection of a vein and an artery, usually in the forearm, to allow access to the vascular system for hemodialysis). Record review failed to reveal evidence that the facility was assessing, observing, and documenting the care of his/her access site, such as auscultation/palpation of the AV fistula to assure adequate blood flow since 7/28/2023. During a surveyor interview on 8/30/2023 at 11:58 AM, with Registered Nurse, Staff A, she revealed that the only care she provides to the AV fistula is to check the dressing upon return from dialysis. During a surveyor interview on 8/30/2023 at 1:26 PM with the Director of Nursing Service (DNS) and the Administrator, they were unable to provide evidence that the facility was assessing, observing, and documenting the care of the access site per the regulation since 7/28/2023. 1b. Record review of the resident failed to reveal evidence of the development and implementation of a coordinated comprehensive care plan(s) that identifies nursing home and dialysis responsibilities and provides direction for nursing home staff, the development of interventions, based upon current standards of practice including, but not limited to documentation and monitoring of complications, pre-and post-dialysis weights, access sites, lab tests, vital signs including blood pressure and medications, and assessing, observing and documenting care of access sites. During a surveyor interview on 8/30/2023 at 1:26 PM, with the DNS she was unable to provide evidence that a care plan was initiated per the regulation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 out 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 out 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in June of 2023 with a diagnosis of, but is not limited to, chronic kidney disease. Record review of a facility provided bowel protocol revealed that if the resident doesn't have a bowel movement (BM) in 48 hours to administer prune juice. It further revealed that if the resident doesn't have a bowel movement in 72 hours administer Miralax. Additionally, if there is no effect from the above interventions to administer Bisacodyl 10 milligrams by mouth or rectally. Lastly the document states If no BM after the above interventions-conduct a bowel assessment and notify MD [Medical Doctor] for new orders. Record review revealed a progress note dated 8/28/2023 at 9:00 PM authored by Registered Nurse (RN), Staff A, which states Resident has no documented BM since coming back from the hospital on 8/25/2023. Resident has non-distended abdomen but is firm upon palpation, there is large bruise on [his/her] lower abdomen. Unable to verbalized [his/her] last BM. [S/he] had low appetite this evening. [S/he] received [his/her] Miralax this am, Enema given [medication may be used to relieve occasional constipation]. Record review of the Medication Administration Record for August 2023 failed to reveal evidence that Bisacodyl 10 milligrams by mouth or rectally was offered to the resident per the protocol. Record review of the Medication Administration Record for August 2023 revealed that on 8/28/2023 a Fleet Enema (sodium phosphates) was administered to the resident. Further record review failed to reveal evidence that the physician was notified prior to administration of the enema. During a surveyor interview on 8/30/2023 at 11:58 AM with Staff A, she revealed that she did not call the physician to request an order to administer the fleet enema to the resident on 8/28/2023. She indicated that the resident had not moved his/her bowels in a few days and that she decided to give the fleet enema. Review of the warnings listed related to a Fleet Enema (sodium phosphates) revealed that you should not use Fleet Enema without a doctor's advice if you have kidney disease. During a surveyor interview on 8/30/2023 at 1:45 PM with the resident's physician, he revealed that he would have expected the nurse to call and obtain an order for the administration of a fleet enema as it is relatively contraindicated in resident with impaired kidney function. During a surveyor interview with the Director of Nursing Services and the Administrator on 8/31/2023 at approximately 10:00 AM, they were unable to provide evidence that the resident was kept free for unnecessary medications.
Feb 2023 7 deficiencies 1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmissi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections relative to a norovirus outbreak and COVID-19, Resident ID #'s 2, 4, 6, 11, 16, 21, 29, 33, 37, 43, 47, 51, 60, 65, 70, 132, 135, 136, 137,138, and 238. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of a facility provided policy titled Isolation states in part, if equipment must be shared remove from the room it must be adequately disinfected before another use . According to the CDC document provided by the facility titled Key Infection Control Recommendations for the control of Norovirus Outbreak [Norovirus is a very contagious virus that causes vomiting and diarrhea] in Healthcare Settings states in part, .disinfection of patient care areas and frequently touched surfaces during outbreaks of norovirus gastroenteritis .disinfected .using EPA [Environmental Protection Agency]-approved products [products that are approved to kill specific bacteria, viruses, or fungi] . Record review revealed that Resident ID #2 tested positive for Norovirus on 2/15/2023. During surveyor observation from 2/13/2023 through 2/15/2023 of Resident ID #'s 2, 4, 6, 11, 16, 21, 29, 33, 37, 43, 47, 51, 60, 65, 70, 132, 135, 136, 137,138, and 238 rooms revealed isolation carts outside of each room with Micro Kill + wipes and were on precautions related to Norovirus symptoms. During a surveyor observation on 2/15/2023 at 9:04 AM revealed RN, Staff O in Resident ID #132's room with a vital sign machine taking the resident blood pressure and oxygen level. At 9:06 AM Staff O wiped the multiuse equipment with Micro Kill + and then went to the resident roommate and obtained his/her blood pressure with the same machine. Staff, O then obtained an additional multiuse blood pressure cuff and obtained Resident ID #132's blood pressure and stated to the surveyor, the resident's blood pressure was low and was vomiting the prior day. Staff O then exited the room and wiped down the multiuse equipment with Micro Kill + wipes and then gave it back to the other RN Staff, B who placed it on his nurse medication cart. Record review of a cleaner called Micro-Kill + revealed the cleaner kills 13 infectious microorganisms listed in the table in up to 5 minutes. Further review of the Micro Kill + table failed to reveal Norovirus as one the microorganisms listed that the product kills. During a surveyor interview on 2/15/2023 at 9:18 AM with RN, Staff B and RN Staff, O, they acknowledged that the facility uses multiuse equipment and Resident ID #132 was on precautions for norovirus. Additionally, they acknowledge the multiuse equipment is cleaned with the Micro Kill + and all the isolation carts had Micro Kill + on them. Furthermore, they acknowledged Micro Kill + did not list Norovirus as a microorganism killed by the product. During a surveyor interview on 2/15/2023 at 9:26 AM with the Director of Nursing Services and IP they acknowledged the Micro Kill + wipes that were on all the isolation carts and nurses cart failed to kill the norovirus microorganism. During a surveyor observation on 2/16/2023 at 12:02 PM revealed Micro Kill + wipes on the isolation cart outside of Resident ID #132's room. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 with Staff O, she was unsure as to why the Micro Kill + wipes were on the resident isolation cart and removed them from the area. 2. Record review of a facility provided policy titled Isolation states in part, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to prevent the spread of infection within the facility through the use of isolation precautions .Transmission Based precautions- use the CDC [Center for Disease Control and Prevention] guidelines for Isolation Precautions to determine the infective materials, precautions needed, duration of precautions . According to the CDC document provided by the facility titled Key Infection Control Recommendations for the control of Norovirus Outbreak [Norovirus is a very contagious virus that causes vomiting and diarrhea] in Healthcare Settings states in part, .Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) if norovirus infection is suspected, adherence to PPE use according to Contact .Precautions is recommended for individuals entering the patient care area (i.e., gowns and gloves upon entry) . Surveyor observation upon entering the building on 2/13/2023 at approximately 7:50 AM revealed signage on the main door stating the facility was experiencing a gastrointestinal illness. Record review revealed a facility provided document titled, Gastrointestinal Illness Outbreak: Cumulative* Line List for RESIDENTS with a start date of the initial outbreak of 2/6/2023. Record review of contact precaution signs posted on rooms through the facility state in part, Stop .CONTACT PRECAUTIONS EVERYONE MUST: clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Put on gloves .put on gown .Clean and disinfect reusable equipment before use on another person. During a surveyor observation on 2/13/2023 at 8:58 AM of Resident ID #70's room revealed signage which states, PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Put on gloves .put on gown . Further observation revealed Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff H entering Resident ID #70's room without a gown or gloves on. During surveyor observation on 2/13/2023 at 9:40 AM revealed Resident ID #60's room had an isolation cart outside of the room with Micro Kill + wipes and contact precaution signage. Additionally, the resident was sitting out in common area of unit and was not redirected to return to his/her room. During a surveyor interview immediately following the above mentioned observation with Registered Nurse (RN) Staff D, she revealed that the resident is independent and noncompliant with care. Additionally, she revealed she received report the resident vomited overnight. During a surveyor observation on 2/13/2023 at 9:59 AM of Resident ID #238's room had an isolation cart outside of the room with Micro Kill + wipes and contact precaution signage. Additional observation revealed Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff I in Resident ID #238's room without a gown or gloves on. During a surveyor observation on 2/13/2023 at 10:36 AM of Resident ID #16's room that revealed signage which states, PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Put on gloves .put on gown .Two housekeepers Staff J and Staff K were observed taking down the privacy curtain and replacing it with a new one without a gown or gloves on. Further observation revealed Staff J dragging the soiled curtain on the floor down the hallway. During a surveyor interview on 2/13/2023 immediately following the above mentioned observation with Staff K, he acknowledged they did not wear the appropriate PPE in the resident's room. During an additional surveyor observation on 2/13/2023 at 12:16 PM revealed NA, Staff I entering Resident ID #238's room without a gown and gloves. Additionally, during this observation the facility Social Worker entered the room without wearing a gown and gloves. During a surveyor interview immediately following the above mentioned observation with NA, Staff I, she acknowledged the signage outside of the resident's room stated to wear a gown and gloves when entering. Additionally, she revealed she forgot to put on the proper PPE. During a surveyor observation on 2/13/2023 at 12:42 PM revealed NA, Staff L in Resident ID #60's room without gloves or gown on per the signage at the door. During a surveyor interview immediately following the above mentioned observation Staff L acknowledged that the signage on the door indicated the use of gloves and gowns when entering the room and that she did not wear the proper PPE. During a surveyor interview on 2/13/2023 at 2:13 PM with the Infection Preventionist (IP), she revealed her expectation is the staff to wear gloves gown and goggle for resident on precautions. During a surveyor observation on 2/14/2023 at 8:46 AM of Resident ID #16's room revealed signage which states, Stop .CONTACT PRECAUTIONS EVERYONE MUST: clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Put on gloves .put on gown . Staff H entered Resident ID #16's room without a gown or gloves on and failed to wash her hands prior to entering or exiting the room. During a surveyor observation on 2/14/2023 at 8:58 AM of Resident ID #6's room revealed signage which states in part, .PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: .Put on gloves .put on gown . Further surveyor observation revealed NA, Staff M entering Resident ID #6's room without a gown or gloves on. During a surveyor observation on 2/14/2023 at 8:50 AM of Resident ID #70's room revealed signage which states, Stop .CONTACT PRECAUTIONS EVERYONE MUST: clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. PROVIDERS AND STAFF MUST ALSO: Put on gloves .put on gown . NA, Staff H entering Resident ID #70's room without a gown or gloves on and failed to wash her hands prior to entering or exiting the room. During a surveyor interview on 2/14/2023 at 8:53 AM with Registered Nurse (RN) Staff N, she revealed the staff should wear a gown and gloves into each room on contact precautions. During a surveyor observation on 2/14/2023 at 11:25 AM of Resident ID #60, revealed the resident out in the common dining area. Additionally, the contact precaution signage was posted on the resident's door with an isolation cart. During a surveyor observation on 2/16/2023 at 8:08 AM of Resident ID #21's room revealed signage which states in part, Contact Precautions . During a surveyor observation on 2/16/2023 at 8:08 AM revealed Resident ID #21 was sitting in the common area next to another resident. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at 8:12 AM with RN, Staff D, she acknowledged Resident ID #21 was on precautions related to having loose stool. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at approximately 1:00 PM with the DNS, she was unable to provide evidence that the staff wore the appropriate PPE and performed hand hygiene per the facility policy and signage. 3. Review of a facility policy titled Testing (and Refusal) of Facility Staff and Residents and a facility provide document titled COVID-19 information for Nursing Homes dated 10/12/2022 revealed in part, Nursing home use empiric transmission based precautions (use of N95, goggles, gown and gloves) to mitigate COVID-19 transmission in order to rule out COVID-19 infection for symptomatic residents (symptoms include fever, diarrhea body aches, cough, head ache). Empiric transmission-based precautions and source control may be discontinued when residents test negative for COVID-19. During the facility entrance conference on 2/13/2023 at 8:12 AM with the Director of Nursing Services, she revealed that there was on positive case of COVID-19 in the facility. Record review revealed that on 2/10/2023: -Resident ID #70 had one episode of vomiting and diarrhea and was on contact precautions. -Resident ID #29 had two episodes of vomiting and was placed on the Norovirus Protocol [orders for labs and medication provided by the medical director]. -Resident ID #238 had four episodes of large loose stools between 7AM-10 AM and has been symptomatic since 2/8/2023. Additional record review failed to reveal evidence that the above mentioned residents were tested to rule out COVID-19 per the policy. Record review revealed that on 2/11/2023: -Resident ID #43 had two episodes of diarrhea and was on contact precautions. Additional record review failed to reveal evidence that the above mentioned resident was tested to rule out COVID-19 per the policy. Record review revealed that on 2/12/2023: -Resident ID #16 had one episode of vomiting and was placed on contact precautions. -Resident ID #138 had two loose stools and was started on the Norovirus Protocol. -Resident ID #4 had two episodes of loose stool. -Resident ID #47 had loose stools and vomiting. Additional record review failed to reveal evidence the above mentioned residents were tested to rule out COVID-19 per the policy. Record review revealed that on 2/13/2023: -Resident ID #60 had vomited twice and was on precautions. -Resident ID #33 had two episodes of vomiting, who is also the roommate to Resident ID #43, who was initially symptomatic on 2/11/2023. -Resident ID #65 was on contact precautions related to episodes of diarrhea. -Resident ID #136 had complaints of nausea and vomited small amounts of thick vomitus. Additional record review failed to reveal evidence the above mentioned residents were tested to rule out COVID-19 per the policy. Record review revealed that on 2/14/2023: -Resident ID #6 had two episodes of diarrhea, who is also the roommate to Resident ID #29, who was initially symptomatic on 2/10/2023. -Resident ID #132 had initial episode of vomiting, who is also the roommate to Resident ID #47, who was initially symptomatic on 2/12/2023. -Resident ID #2 reported nausea and vomiting. -Resident ID #37 had nausea and diarrhea with his/her hospice nurse. Additional record review failed to reveal evidence the above mentioned residents were tested to rule out COVID-19 per the policy. Record review revealed that on 2/15/2023: -Resident ID #2 stool sample had resulted positive for Norovirus. -Resident ID #137 progress note revealed s/he has the norovirus, who is also the roommate to Resident ID #138, who was initially symptomatic on 2/13/2023. -Resident ID #11 had one episode of vomiting. -Resident ID #2 roommate Resident ID #51 had episode of vomiting and was placed on precautions. -Resident ID #135 received Ondansetron (a medication used for nausea and vomiting) 4 milligrams on 2/15/2023 at 1:39 AM related to upset stomach. Additional record review failed to reveal evidence the above mentioned residents were tested to rule out COVID-19 per the policy. Record review revealed that on 2/16/2023: -Resident ID #21 had one large diarrhea. -Resident ID #39 had two episodes of diarrhea. Additional record review failed to reveal evidence the above mentioned residents were tested to rule out COVID-19 per the policy. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at approximately 1:00 PM with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), she was unable to provide evidence that residents with symptoms of COVID-19 were tested to rule out infection per their policy. Record review and surveyor observations on 2/16/2023 at approximately 12:00 PM revealed Resident ID #s 132 and 137 were receiving intravenous hydration following signs and symptoms of the norovirus. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at approximately 1:00 PM with the Director of Nursing Services, she acknowledged the outbreak initially started on 2/6/2023 and was still ongoing on 2/16/2023. Additionally, she was unable to provide evidence the facility provided effective infection control practices to prevent the spread of Norovirus.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, relative to individualizin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences, relative to individualizing the physical environment relative to the resident's bed, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed, Resident ID # 37. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2018 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease and chronic heart failure. Review of a care plan revealed an approach dated 7/29/2020, that stated in part, [Resident] has chronic issues with bilateral lower edema . During a surveyor interview on 2/13/2023 at 9:50 AM, with the resident s/he revealed that his/her right foot was in pain. Additionally, the surveyor observed that the resident's right foot was resting on the wood foot board and his/her toes and heel were purple in color. During a surveyor interview with Registered Nurse (RN), Staff A, she revealed that pain and discoloration of toes and heel was not the resident's baseline. During a surveyor observation on 2/14/2023 at 9:01 AM the resident was observed with his/her right foot resting on the wood foot board. The toes and heel on his/her right foot were blue in color. During a subsequent surveyor interview with the resident s/he revealed that s/he was experiencing pain to his/her right foot from his/her foot being on the foot board. During a surveyor observation on 2/14/2023 at 11:59 AM, the resident was observed with his/her right foot resting on the foot board. During a surveyor interview on 2/14/2023 at 12:06 PM, with RN, Staff B, he acknowledged the resident's right foot was against the foot board. He further acknowledged that the resident's foot was painful to touch and discolored. Following the above interview, Staff B removed the residents foot board. Review of a progress note dated 2/14/2023 at 2:54 PM, stated in part, .[Resident] has 4+ pitting edema [swelling due to excess fluid accumulation in the body tissues, deep indentation] to right lower leg and foot .Bottom of all toes of right foot with dark purple discolorations, tender to light touch .offered and given PO [by mouth] acetaminophen 650 mg [milligram] . During a surveyor interview on 2/15/2023 at 10:44 AM, with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), she acknowledged that the resident was in pain due to his/her foot resting on the foot board and revealed that the facility will pad the foot board for comfort and to accommodate the residents individualized needs.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 1 sample residents related to dialysis, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Record review for Resident ID #2 revealed s/he was re-admitted to the facility in October of 2022, with diagnoses to include, but not limited to, end stage renal disease (ESRD) (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life). This resident is currently receiving dialysis. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 1/27/2023 for a 960 ml (milliliters) fluid restriction over 24 hours. Record review of the resident's vitals for fluid documentation revealed the following dates where the resident exceeded the fluid restriction order: - 2/13/2023 - 1440 ml - 2/12/2023 - 1080 ml - 2/11/2023 - 1440 ml - 2/8/2023 - 1380 ml - 2/7/2023 - 1520 ml - 2/6/2023 - 1300 ml - 2/4/2023 - 1640 ml - 2/3/2023 - 1400 ml Record review of the progress notes from 2/3/2023 through 2/14/2023 failed to reveal evidence that the doctor was notified of the resident exceeding his/her fluid restriction on the above dates. During a surveyor interview on 2/15/2023 at approximately 1:20 PM with Registered Nurse, Staff B, he was unable to provide evidence that the doctor was notified of the resident exceeding his/her fluid restriction on the above dates. During a surveyor interview on 2/15/2023 at approximately 2:20 PM with the Director of Nursing Services she was unable to provide evidence that the doctor was notified of the resident exceeding his/her fluid restriction on the above dates.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 residents reviewed...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from significant medication errors for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for medication administration relative to Coumadin therapy, Resident ID #235. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in February of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, long term (current) use of anticoagulants (medicines that help prevent blood clots). Record review revealed the following physician's orders: - 2/7/2023 - resident is on coumadin therapy. Verify lab order is in place and coumadin order is followed. - 2/9/2023 - 2/13/2023 - warfarin (coumadin) tablet; 1 mg (milligrams); Amount to Administer: 1.5mg; Once A Day. - 2/13/2023 - 2/13/2023 - PT/INR (prothrombin time/international normalized ratio; test measures the time it takes for a clot to form in a blood sample) Record review of a progress note dated 2/13/2023 at 3:20 PM revealed, INR reported to (Name redacted) with new order to hold warfarin until 2/15/2023, then repeat INR on 2/15/2023 and follow up with provider with new results for dosage instructions. Record review failed to reveal evidence the resident's PT/INR results were reported to the provider to obtain a new order for coumadin therapy, resulting in the resident missing the 2/15/2023 dose of coumadin. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at 8:33 AM with Registered Nurse, Staff A, she was unable to provide evidence that the lab was reported to the provider, and a new order was put in place. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at 8:38 AM with the Director of Nurses, she acknowledged that the INR wasn't reported to the provider. Additionally, she acknowledged that an updated coumadin order was not obtained and that the resident missed his/her dose of Coumadin on 2/15/2023. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at 8:54 AM with the facility's contracted lab employee, she revealed the lab provided the INR results on 2/15/2023 at approximately 1:50 PM to the facility.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for assessing and diagnosing a resident with a psychiatric disorder...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for assessing and diagnosing a resident with a psychiatric disorder for use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for psychotropic medication use, Resident ID #21 Findings are as follows: According to the State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, Revised 10/21/2022 states in part, .the regulations and guidance are intended to ensure psychotropic medications are used only when the medication(s) is appropriate to treat a resident's specific, diagnosed, and documented condition . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2018 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition and major depressive disorder. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 2/12/2021, for Risperidone tablet 0.5 mg (milligram) oral, twice daily with diagnosis for use as schizoaffective disorder. Further review revealed an order dated 3/4/2022, for Risperidone 0.25 mg oral, once daily with diagnosis for use as schizoaffective disorder. Review of the resident's face sheet revealed diagnoses including, schizoaffective disorder dated 2/2021 and bipolar disorder dated 4/2022. Review of the resident's most recent psychiatric evaluation completed by Optum Behavioral Health on 9/10/2022 revealed pertinent psych diagnosis as major depressive disorder, dementia, and generalized anxiety disorder. Record review failed to reveal evidence of a physician assessment and diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at 8:46 AM with the Director of Nursing Services, the Assistant Director of Nursing and Registered Nurse, Staff A, they were unable to provide evidence that a physician diagnosed the resident with schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder and were unsure how the resident received the diagnoses.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for care and delivery of parentera...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for care and delivery of parenteral hydration for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for intravenous (IV) use, Resident ID #'s 137, 235 and 236. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #137 was admitted to the facility in January of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, urinary tract infection and Covid-19. Record review revealed a progress note dated 2/15/2023 that states in part, .STAT (immediately) D 5 ½ NS (dextrose mixed with normal saline) 60 ml/hr (milliliters per hour) . Review of the physician's orders revealed an order for, D 5 1/2 NS 60 ml/hr x 1 L Special Instructions: D/C (discontinue) order after .infusion . Surveyor observation on 2/16/2023 at 8:12 AM revealed the resident was receiving IV therapy. The IV bag was noted to be hung to gravity (when hanging an IV bag to gravity, the nurse must calculate the drops per minute to ensure the ordered infusion rate is being followed, by utilizing the IV drip rate formula to determine the drops for minute (gtts/min). The nurse then regulates the infusion rate by adjusting the clamp on the IV tubing and counting the gtts/min to ensure the prescribed amount of IV therapy is being infused to the patient). Additional observation of the 1000 mL IV bag, revealed approximately 300 mls of D 5 ½ normal saline and that the IV bag was labeled as hung at 3 PM on 2/15/2023, indicating it had been hung approximately 17 hours and prior to this observation and that the infusion should have been completed at approximately 7:30 AM if it was infusing at 60 ml/hr. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 immediately following the above observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff C, she acknowledged that the IV infusion should have been completed and revealed she was able to calculate the drip rate on an IV bag that was hung to gravity. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at 8:31 AM with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) she was unable to provide evidence that Resident ID #137 was receiving the ordered fluid as the facility did not appropriately calculate flow rate. 2. Review of a policy titled, Dressing Change - PICC Line (peripherally inserted central catheter) states in part, Procedure .5. Assess .the external length of the catheter. Record review revealed Resident ID #235 was admitted to the facility in February of 2023 with diagnoses of, but not limited to, pancreatic cancer and adult failure to thrive. During a surveyor observation on 2/15/2023 at approximately 1:45 PM of Registered Nurse (RN) Staff B, performing a PICC line dressing change he failed to measure the external length of the catheter, prior to or during the dressing change. During a surveyor interview directly following the above observation with Staff B he acknowledged that he did not measure the external length of the catheter as the policy states. During a surveyor interview on 2/16/2023 at 10:15 AM, with the DNS, she acknowledged that the nurse did not measure the external length of catheter and did not follow the policy. 3. Review of a policy titled, IV Care and Maintenance states in part, .Midline, PICC .Minimum intervals for flushing each lumen (whenever lumen is locked with no infusion currently running): 10 ML (milliliters) Saline every 8 hours + PRN (as needed). Record review revealed Resident ID #236 was admitted to the facility in January of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, peripheral vascular disease and infection of the skin. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 2/9/2023 that states, Discontinue PICC -- prepare for discharge signed off as not completed with a comment stating, done at podiatrist's office. Further review revealed an order that was discontinued on 2/9/2023 that stated, 0.9% Normal Saline 10mL flush: PICC Line. During a surveyor observation on 2/13/2023 at 10:47 AM, of the resident revealed a PICC line in place to his/her right arm. Review of a progress note dated 2/13/2023 at 12:54 PM, stated in part, .PICC line pulled out following [facility] policy and procedure, no bleeding from insertion site, pressure dressing applied to site secured with Kling and medical tape . Record review failed to reveal evidence of the PICC line being flushed or cared for per facility policy from 2/9/2023 until 2/13/2023 when removed. During a surveyor interview on 2/15/2023 at 10:42 AM with the DNS she was unable to provide evidence that the PICC line had been flushed per the facility policy from 2/9/2023 until 2/13/2023.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on surveyor observation and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food serv...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on surveyor observation and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that food is stored and distributed, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, relative to the main kitchen. Findings are as follows: During the initial tour of the main kitchen on 2/13/2023 at 8:10 AM revealed the following observations: - Server, Staff F's hairnet was not covering her bangs while she was serving breakfast. - A fan, with an accumulation of dust (on the blades and encasement), blowing in the direction of the food preparation area during breakfast. -9 stacked pans that were ready to be used had food matter and dried substance stuck to the inside of the pans. - An accumulation of dust and grease on the metal slats within the exhaust hood, located behind the stove. -The back of the oven blower had an accumulation of dust and grease. During a surveyor interview with the Food Service Director following the above observations, he acknowledged that Staff F not wearing her hair net appropriately, the dirty fan blowing in the direction of the food preparation, the 9 dirty pans ready for use, the accumulation of grease on the exhaust hood and the accumulation of dust and grease on the back of the oven blower.
Dec 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that services provided by the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 of 3 residents reviewed relative to med...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that services provided by the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 2 of 3 residents reviewed relative to medication administration, Resident ID #s 1 and 3. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314 states, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment, Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. 1.Record review revealed Resident ID #1 was readmitted to the facility in August of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, thrombophilia (abnormal blood clotting disorder) and long-term use of anticoagulants. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 8/24/2022 for Eliquis (apixaban) tablet [an anticoagulant medication]; 5 mg [milligrams]; amt [amount]; 1 tab [tablet] .Every 12 Hours; 08:00 AM, 08:00 PM. Record review of the November 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed Eliquis was administered late on the following dates and times: 11/2/2022 at 11:44 AM 11/4/2022 at 11:05 AM 11/5/2022 at 11:00 AM 11/7/2022 at 10:32 AM 11/9/2022 at 10:17 AM 11/10/2022 at 11:17 AM 11/11/2022 at 11:14 AM 11/12/2022 at 11:17 AM 11/14/2022 at 10:32 AM 11/16/2022 at 10:08 AM 11/17/2022 at 10:51 AM 11/18/2022 at 11:08 AM 11/19/2022 at 11:01 AM 11/20/2022 at 10:10 AM 11/21/2022 at 11:37 AM 11/22/2022 at 10:27 AM 11/23/2022 at 12:03 PM 11/24/2022 at 10:29 AM 11/25/2022 at 11:45 AM 11/26/2022 at 11:04 AM 11/28/2022 at 2:47 PM. Record review of the December 2022 MAR revealed Eliquis was administered late on the following dates and times: 12/1/2022 at 10:04 AM 12/2/2022 at 10:03 AM 12/3/2022 at 1:53 PM 12/4/2022 at 10:09 AM 12/5/2022 at 10:15 AM. During a surveyor interview on 12/6/2022 at 11:55 AM with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), she acknowledged that the Eliquis was not administered as ordered on the above-listed dates and times. 2. Record review revealed Resident ID #3 was admitted to the facility in September of 2022 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, COVID-19 acute respiratory disease. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 11/24/2022 to 11/29/2022 for Paxlovid (EUA) (nirmatralvir-ritonavir) tablets [an antiviral medication], dose pack; 150-100 mg; amt: 2 tabs (150-100); oral Special Instructions: x 5 days Twice A Day; 07:00 AM - 11:00 AM, 07:00 PM - 09:00 PM. Record review of the November 2022 MAR revealed Paxlovid was not administered on the following dates and times: 11/24/2022 at 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM 11/25/2022 at 7:00 AM - 11:00 AM. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the provider was notified of the resident missing 2 out of 10 Paxlovid doses. During a surveyor interview on 12/6/2022 at 11:55 AM with the DNS, she acknowledged that the Paxlovid was not administered as ordered on the above-listed dates and times. Additionally, she revealed that she would expect staff to notify the provider of the resident not receiving the medication as ordered.
Dec 2022 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents relative to transfers for 1 o...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents relative to transfers for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/2/2022 alleges that on Wednesday 11/23/2022 the family called the resident at 8 AM. The resident revealed something occurred the night prior while in the restroom and his/her right arm hurt. On 11/23/2022, the resident's right arm .lied like a dead fish on that bed all day . The resident was unable to lift it or move it that day. An X-ray was obtained at 7:30 PM and resulted on 11/24/2022, the residents .right arm was broken . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, unspecified fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing (spinal fracture), rheumatoid arthritis, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review revealed a Physical Therapy Treatment Encounter Note(s) dated 11/22/2022 which states in part, .patient will need to be hoyer lift until able to participate safely with functional transfers . Record review revealed a document titled Safe Patient Handling (SPH) Recommendations dated 11/22/2022 which states in part, .Patent requires hoyer lift to ensure safety with functional transfers . Record review of the residents ADL [Activities of Daily Living]: Transfer revealed on 11/22/2022 at 9:34 PM the resident was lifted manually with a 2-person physical assist, documented by Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff B. Record review of the progress notes revealed the following entries: -11/23/2022 at 9:31 AM .complained of pain 9/10 to right upper arm, [s/he] requested and received 5 mg of oxycodone [pain medication] PO [by mouth] prn [as needed] x [times] 1 at this now. -11/23/2022 at 2:57 PM Written order from .RNP [Registered Nurse Practitioner] .X-rays of right upper arm, r/o [rule out] fracture. -11/23/2022 10:50 PM Patient is alert and anxious. Complained of pain with administration of vital signs .X-ray of arm pending . -11/24/2022 7:30 AM Resident is alert and oriented. c/o [complaint of] right arm pain. -11/24/2022 8:53 AM X-ray results of right upper arm .Acute humeral neck fracture and greater tuberosity fractures with moderate displacement . During a surveyor interview on 12/2/2022 at 10:40 AM with Registered Nurse (RN), Staff A, revealed the resident had a history of pain in his/her left arm. Additionally, he revealed the resident was able to move his/her right arm prior to 11/23/2022 and that the right arm was his/her good arm. Furthermore, he revealed the resident was a 2 person assist to transfer with the use of a gait belt prior to 11/22/2022. On 11/22/2022 the resident was changed to a hoyer lift for all transfers. During a surveyor interview on 12/2/2022 at 1:36 PM with Staff B, she revealed that she documented the was resident lifted manually with a 2-person physical assist. She further explained that one NA would hooked the resident under one arm and the other NA would hooked the resident under the other arm and lifted the resident up to transfer. She acknowledged that she did not use a hoyer lift to transfer the resident. During surveyor interviews on 12/2/2022 at 11:24 AM and 1:57 PM with the Director of Nursing Services (DNS), she revealed she would expect staff to follow SPH recommendations for residents' transfers. She acknowledged that the resident's SPH recommendations to be transferred via hoyer lift were not followed on 11/22/2022. Additionally, she acknowledged the resident's x-ray revealed a a right acute humeral neck and greater tuberosity fracture following the transfer on 11/22/2022.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigate...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with an injury of unknown origin was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health dated 11/25/2022 alleges an X-Ray for the resident was obtained by the facility related to a complaint of right upper arm. The X-Ray resulted with an acute humeral neck and greater tuberosity fracture, with moderate displacement (right shoulder fracture). Record review of a document titled Nursing Facility 5-Day Investigation Report dated 11/29/2022 revealed in part, Resident has a history of falls at home prior to hospital admission and admission to the facility. There was no documentation that [his/her] Right humerus was x-rayed prior to the admission at the hospital. Resident didn't have any falls at the facility during [his/her] admission . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, unspecified fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing (spinal fracture), rheumatoid arthritis, and cognitive communication deficit. During a surveyor interview on 12/2/2022 at 10:40 AM with Registered Nurse (RN), Staff A, he acknowledged he worked on 11/22/2022 and 11/23/2022 with the resident. He revealed the resident had a history of pain in his/her left arm. Additionally, he revealed the resident was able to move his/her right arm prior to 11/23/2022 and that the right arm was his/her good arm. Furthermore, he revealed the resident was a 2 person assist to transfer with the use of a gait belt prior to 11/22/2022. On 11/22/2022 the resident was changed to a hoyer lift for all transfers. Record review revealed a Physical Therapy Treatment Encounter Note(s) dated 11/22/2022 which states in part, .patient will need to be hoyer lift until able to participate safely with functional transfers . Record review revealed a document titled Safe Patient Handling (SPH) Recommendations dated 11/22/2022 which states in part, .Patent requires hoyer lift to ensure safety with functional transfers . During a surveyor interview on 12/2/2022 at 1:36 PM with Nursing Assistant (NA), Staff B, she revealed that she worked on 11/22/2022 and documented the resident was lifted manually with a 2-person physical assist. She further explained that one NA would hooked the resident under one arm and the other NA would hooked the resident under the other arm and lifted the resident up to transfer. She indicated a hoyer lift was not utilized to transfer the resident on 11/22/2022. Record review failed to reveal evidence that a thorough investigation was completed related to this injury of unknown origin. During a surveyor interview on 12/2/2022 at 1:57 PM with the Director of Nursing Services, she was unable to provide evidence that the facility conducted a thorough investigation after the fracture of unknown origin was identified.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $32,483 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 24 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $32,483 in fines. Higher than 94% of Rhode Island facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (38/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 38/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Rhode Island, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Staffed?

CMS rates Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 47%, compared to the Rhode Island average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com?

State health inspectors documented 24 deficiencies at Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 22 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com?

Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by EDEN HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 72 residents (about 90% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Greenville, Rhode Island.

How Does Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Compare to Other Rhode Island Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island, Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com's overall rating (3 stars) is below the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (47%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Stick Around?

Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com has a staff turnover rate of 47%, which is about average for Rhode Island nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com Ever Fined?

Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com has been fined $32,483 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Rhode Island average of $33,404. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Stillwater Assisted Living And Skilled Nursing Com on Any Federal Watch List?

Stillwater Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing Com is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.