Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #8 out of 72 facilities in Rhode Island, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among five facilities in Bristol County. However, the facility is experiencing a concerning trend, with issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 10 in 2024. Staffing is a strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 32%, which is better than the state average of 41%. Notably, there have been no fines against the facility, and it has more RN coverage than 87% of facilities in the state. While there are strengths, there are also weaknesses to consider. Recent inspections revealed that the facility failed to adequately assess the necessary resources for resident care and did not follow physician’s orders for specific resident treatments. Additionally, the facility did not complete required annual performance reviews for its nursing assistants, which could impact care quality. Overall, families should weigh these strengths and concerns when making their decision.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Rhode Island
- #8/72
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 32% turnover. Near Rhode Island's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Rhode Island facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 68 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Rhode Island nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (32%)
16 points below Rhode Island average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
14pts below Rhode Island avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Dec 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed relative to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision by staff to prevent acciden...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that are accurately documented in accordance with profess...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 1 resident reviewed with a physici...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to complete an annual performance review for every nurse aide (nursing assistant; NA), at least once every 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for ins...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to provide written information to the resident or resident representative that specifies the facility's bed-hold ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the assessment accura...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on surveyor observations, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure th...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require a feeding tube receive the appropriate treatment and services to preven...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that are accurately documented in accordance with profess...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0838
(Tag F0838)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents c...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 5 residents reviewed relative to skin integrity, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident is offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration for 1 of 1 residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Smoking Policies
(Tag F0926)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to establish policies, in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and local laws and re...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Rhode Island.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Rhode Island facilities.
- • 32% turnover. Below Rhode Island's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Rhode Island, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Staffed?
CMS rates Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 32%, compared to the Rhode Island average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation during 2022 to 2024. These included: 16 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation?
Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GENESIS HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 63 certified beds and approximately 51 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Warren, Rhode Island.
How Does Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Compare to Other Rhode Island Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island, Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (32%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Rhode Island. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Stick Around?
Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has a staff turnover rate of 32%, which is about average for Rhode Island nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Ever Fined?
Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Warren Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?
Warren Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.